Corona Regional Medical Center D/P SNF
730 Magnolia Avenue, Corona, CA 92879 · For profit - Corporation · 61 certified beds · (951) 736-7200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (26) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 8.2% | 0.4% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 0.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 7.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on dietary observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when:1. Serving pans did not air dried before stacked and stored.2. Two Cooks with facial hair did not wear hair restraint while preparing meals.3. Dust found on the rack and above walk in freezer.4. Grime buildup found on several pieces of equipment.5. Several food items found in kitchen were not properly labeled.6. Expired beverages found in Annex Resident's refrigerator.These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination (bacteria are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another with harmful effect) and foodborne illnesses (are illnesses that results from ingesting contaminated foods) for 6 out of 60 sampled residents who received foods from the kitchen.1. On June 2, 2026, at 10:20 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview were conducted with [NAME] (CK) 1 in the kitchen at cook area. There was a rack stored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-05 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely maintenance of equipment when:1. Rust found on the rack in the kitchen.2. Five worn out cooking pans found in kitchen.These failures had the potential to cause cross contamination to a population 6 out of 60 sample residents who received food from the kitchen.1. According to the Federal Food Code 2022, the Food Code indicates, Food-contact surfaces and utensils are to be clean to sight and touch. Utensils and food contact surfaces of equipment are to have a smooth, easily cleanable surface and resistant to pitting, chipping, crazing, scratching, scoring and decomposition.On June 2, 2026, at 10:20 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview were conducted with the Director of Food Services (DFS) and [NAME] (CK) 1 in the kitchen at cook area. The rack stored clean kitchenware, pots and pans was observed had brown grime. The DFS referred the brown grime as rust. The CK 1 stated rust could contaminate the clean kitchenware, pots and pans. The DFS stated the rack needed to be replaced. 2. According to the Federal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for one of four residents (Resident 34) when nursing staff did not administer pantoprazole (used to treat stomach acid) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 34 not receiving the full benefit of the medication, leading to further health complications. Findings: A review of Resident 34's admission Record, dated June 3, 2026, indicated Resident 34 was initially admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD, or acid reflux), chronic respiratory failure, and gastrostomy (G-tube, a small flexible tube inserted through the belly directly into the stomach). A review of Resident 34's medical record indicated a physician's order for pantoprazole (used to treat acid reflux or prevent stomach bleed) oral packet 40 mg (milligram, unit of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment was provided, for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 60) when midodrine (medication used to treat low blood pressure) was not administered according to the physician's order. This failure had the potential for a delay in care and treatment and could have caused a decline in the resident's overall health condition. Findings:A review of Resident 60's admission Record, dated June 3, 2026, indicated Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included heart failure and hypertensive (high blood pressure) heart disease. A review of Resident 60's medical records indicated the following provider's orders: On February 12, 2026, midodrine (used to treat low blood pressure) tablet give 45 mg (milligram, unit of measurement) by mouth every 6 hours as needed for PRN (as needed) Blood Pressure SBP (systolic blood pressure, the top number in a blood pressure reading when the heart contracts [beats]) < (less…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when a visitor was observed in the room of Resident 8, who was on isolation for contact precaution for Candida Auris (C. Auris - a highly contagious and multidrug resistant fungus), not wearing personal protective equipment (PPE- specialized clothing or equipment worn to create a barrier between healthcare workers and potential sources of infection, like blood, body fluids, or other potentially infectious materials).This failure had the potential to spread Candida Auris to the community.Findings:On June 2, 2026, at 9:48 a.m., during an observation of Resident 8's room, there was a sign posted at the door indicating .Contact Precautions.Gloves and gown are Required.Use disposable equipment or dedicated equipment and leave it in the room.wash hands with soap and water or alcohol-based hand sanitizer.Visitors Must check with nurse before entering room.On June 2, 2026, at 12:38 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for two of three residents, Residents 1 and 2, when:Resident 1 did not have hand rolls in her left and right hands; andResident 2 did not have a left elbow splint.These failures had the potential to result in Residents 1 and 2 having skin impairments and further decline in range of motion.Findings:1.A review of Resident 1's electronic medical record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included respiratory failure (a serious condition that happens when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood).A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Assessment (MDS - an assessment tool) dated July 3, 2025, indicated the resident has functional limitations in range of motion to her left and right, upper and lower extremities.A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report dated March 11, 2026, indicated the following were ordered by the physician on March…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medications were administered within 60 minutes of their scheduled times for one resident, Resident 3.This failure had the potential to result in decreased effectiveness of Resident 3's medications.Findings:On March 11, 2026, at 11:18 a.m., during a medication pass (med pass) observation and interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 prepared the following medications for Resident 3:-ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) 500 mg for supplement;-benztropine mesylate (Cogentin) 0.5 mg for muscle spasm;-cranberry 250 mg for urinary tract infection prophylaxis;-esomeprazole 40 mg for gastrointestinal prophylaxis;-lactobacillus for supplement;-multivitamin and mineral 15 ml for supplement; and-quetiapine (Seroquel) 100 mg for generalized anxiety. During the same observation, LVN 1 administered these medications at 12:08 p.m., to Resident 3 via gastric tube (a soft, flexible tube inserted directly through the skin of the abdomen into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the patients' rights were protected, specifically the right to have their designated representative informed of significant events or changes, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), when the facility did not notify Resident 1's representative of the change in the prescription medication Tylenol #3 (acetaminophen-codeine, pain medication) to the prescription medication tramadol (pain medication).This failure prevented the residents' representative from participating in decisions related to the residents' care and well-being as authorized.Findings:On February 11, 2026, Resident 1's record was reviewed.Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (medical condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood) with hypoxia (low blood oxygen levels), tracheostomy (surgical opening in the neck to breath), gastrostomy (surgical opening into the stomach to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - standardized assessment tool used to evaluate clinical, functional, and psychosocial status of all residents) Assessment accurately reflected the residents' current status for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), when discrepancies were found in Resident 1's Quarterly Comprehensive MDS Assessment.This failure had the potential to lead to inappropriate care planning for Resident 1.Findings:On February 11, 2026, Resident 1's medical record was reviewed.Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (medical condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood) with hypoxia (low blood oxygen levels), tracheostomy (surgical opening in the neck to breath), dependence on respiratory ventilator (inability to breath independently requiring mechanical assistance to get air in and out of the lungs), hemiplegia (paralysis on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a non-pressure related skin impairment received appropriate treatment and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), when the CNA (certified nurse assistant) failed to identify and report a left abdominal fold skin tear to the wound care nurse, resulting in a delay in treatment and increased risk of infection.This failure had the potential to cause a negative outcome in Resident 1's physical health.Findings:On February 17, 2026, Resident 1's medical record was reviewed.Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (medical condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood) with hypoxia (low blood oxygen levels), tracheostomy (surgical opening in the neck to breath), dependence on respiratory ventilator (inability to breath independently requiring mechanical assistance to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 16 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT - a collaborative group of diverse healthcare professionals who work together to create and implement a unified, comprehensive care plan for a resident) notes accurately reflected the residents' current status for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), when discrepancies were found in Resident 1's IDT Notes.This failure had the potential to lead to improper care planning and inaccurate communication between disciplines.Findings:On February 11, 2026, Resident 1's medical record was reviewed.Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (medical condition where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood) with hypoxia (low blood oxygen levels), tracheostomy (surgical opening in the neck to breath), and dependence on respiratory ventilator (inability to breath independently requiring mechanical assistance to get air in and out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided meet professional standards of practice, for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 39), when the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) did not check the NGT (nasogastric tube - a flexible tube inserted through the nose and down the throat into the stomach) placement prior to medication administration. This failure had the potential for Resident 39 to develop aspiration pneumonia (a lung infection that occurs when food, liquid, or objects are inhaled into the lungs causing inflammation and fluid build-up). Findings: On May 21, 2025, at 11:23 a.m., a concurrent medication administration observation and interview was conducted with the LVN. The LVN was observed to prepare Resident 39's medications and checked the arm band to verify her identity. The LVN stopped the feeding, attached a 60 ml (milliliter - a unit of measurement) syringe into the NGT and tried to aspirate for gastric residual (stomach contents). There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 15 vials of Ativan (medication used to treat anxiety disorders) two (2) mg (milligram - a unit of measurement) was not stored beyond the manufacturer's recommended discard date during an inspection of the medication refrigerator in the medication storage room located in the main building. This failure had the potential for a resident to receive an expired and ineffective medication. Findings: On [DATE], at 2:12 p.m., a medication storage room inspection was conducted with the Nurse Manager (NM). One vial of Ativan 2 mg with an expiration date of [DATE], was found stored in the medication refrigerator in the medication storage room located in the main building. In a concurrent interview with the NM, she stated any expired medication should be removed from use to prevent a licensed nurse from administering to a resident. On [DATE], at 3:18 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. The DON stated the staff checked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were not stored in the refrigerator, readily available for use. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness to a vulnerable facility population. Findings: On May 19, 2025, at 7:15 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Director of Nutritional Services (DNS). Two fruit cups labeled with a use-by date of May 18, 2025, were observed in the refrigerator, readily available for use. One fruit cup with no label or date was also observed in the refrigerator, readily available for use. On May 19, 2025, at 7:15 a.m., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the DNS. The DNS stated all items stored in the refrigerator should have a use-by date. The DNS stated the one fruit cup with no label or date should not have been stored in the refrigerator, readily available for use. The DNS stated the two fruit cups should have been discarded on or before the expiration date (use-by date), and not stored in the refrigerator, readily available for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practice was implemented when the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) did not properly clean and disinfect shared glucometer (measures the amount of glucose [sugar] in the body) in accordance with the disposable wipe manufacturer's specified contact time (contact time/wet time - amount of time a disinfectant needs to stay visibly wet on a surface to effectively kill germs). This failure had the potential to expose the resident to cross-contamination and development of infection. Findings: On May 21, 2025, at 12:08 p.m., during a medication administration observation with the LVN, the LVN was observed using a shared glucometer. The LVN was observed to wipe the glucometer with a Sani cloth disposable wipe (used to clean, sanitize and disinfect hard, non-porous surfaces [does not allow liquid or air to pass through it])) then proceeded to check Resident 18's blood sugar. The LVN was observed to wipe the glucometer with a Sani cloth disposable wipe but did not follow the manufacturer's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions of turning and repositioning of dependent residents, for one of four residents (Resident 1), who had the potential for the development of a pressure injury/ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). This failure placed the resident at an increased risk for developing and/or worsening of pressure injuries. Findings: On April 2, 2024, at 10:17 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for a quality-of-care complaint. On April 2, 2024, Resident 1's medical record was reviewed. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute and chronic respiratory failure (unable to breath without difficulty) post tracheostomy (an artificial opening in the trachea to allow oxygen to the lungs), quadriplegia (inability to move all four extremities), and intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain). The physician History and Physical indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to comply with Federal regulations related to the oversight of food service operations when the facility did not have a full-time Registered Dietitian and/or a full-time Director of Food Services in accordance with California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 1265.4 The lack of a full-time, qualified supervision over Food and Nutrition services had the potential to result in inadequate supervision leading to food borne illness for seven residents who received food from the kitchen out of a facility census of 58. Findings: During the Federal re-certification survey from February 12, 2024 - February 15, 2024, it was noted that Food and Nutrition services provided meals not only to skilled nursing residents but also to a separately licensed, Behavioral unit. The skilled nursing facility's Director of Nutritional Services (DRD) and the Nutritional Services Manager (DSS) were working in 3 different facilities, Acute Hospital, Skilled Nursing facility (SNF) and Behavioral unit. Review of the organizational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were able to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services safely and effectively when: 1. The Director of Nutritional Services and the Nutritional Service Manager did not instruct food service workers to follow manufacturer guideline for monitor temperature on dish machine. 2. The cook used wrong scoop plated lunch meal on February 13, 2024, for four residents (Residents 2, 19, 30, and 54). (Cross reference 803) These failures had the potential for unsafe food practices which may lead to foodborne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food), and the potential to not meet the nutritional needs of the residents in a medically vulnerable population of seven out of 58 sample residents who received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. During a review of the Federal FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code 2022, Annex 3: Section 4-204.115 Warewashing Machines, Temperature Measuring Devices, the FDA Food Code indicated, The requirement for the presence of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional needs for four of five residents (Residents 2, 19, 30, and 54), was met for lunch, when the meal was not plated in accordance with menu guidance for lunch. This failure had the potential to result in under or over nutrition. When a resident receives foods that are not consistent with their physician ordered diet, it may result in further compromising the resident's medical status. Findings: During an observation of the lunch meal plating on February 13, 2024, at 11:53 a.m., the [NAME] (CK) used a green scoop, 2.5 ounce (oz.- a unit of measure), for broccoli and rice instead of a grey scoop, 4 oz. per the menu and diet orders. During an interview on February 13, 2024, at 2:30 p.m., with Nutritional Service Supervisor (DSS) and Director of Nutritional Services (DRD), were asked to explain the scoop colors and the size. They explained the green scoop is 2.5 oz. and the grey scoop is four oz. or equal to 1/2 cup. DSS and DRD explained that if the wrong scoop size was used to plate the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when : 1. The Prep sink did not have an air gap; 2. Nine cutting boards surface were heavily marred; 3. Three storage silver shelves in trayline area had rust; 4. Two microwaves in the kitchen were dirty; 5. Lacked temperature monitor for Prep table refrigerator; 6. Multiple areas in the kitchen were covered with dust; 7. The walk in refrigerator's gasket was wore out; 8. Unsanitary storage condition in walk in refrigerator; 9. Multiple areas in the kitchen's floor did not have smooth surface; 10. Trash were found in the multiple areas in the kitchen; 11. Build up grease and black/brown debris found on fire suppression unit above stove and fryer; 12. Cobweb found in dry storage room; and 13. Under the grill/stove range there was burn buildup material and black particles. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (stomach illness acquired from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly when trash was found on the ground surrounding the trash compactor, and the trash was piled up above the fill rim of the trash compactor. This failure had the potential to attract rodents and insects which could place residents at risk for cross contamination (the process by which bacteria are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object with harmful effect) and foodborne illness (illnesses cause from ingestion contaminated food). Findings: During an observation and interview of Foodservice Worker (FSW), on February 13, 2024, at 2:00 p.m., the FSW was observed taking trash to the trash compactor located in the parking lot at the back of the facility. Bags of trash were seen above the trash compactor fill line, and loose trash (gloves, glass bottles, paper) on the ground around the compactor. One clear, plastic trash bag was hanging over the side of the trash compactor with a yellow liquid in it. There was a strong odor around the compactor. The FSW stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan for the monitoring of resident's edema (a swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in body's tissues) for one of one resident reviewed (Resident 161). This failure resulted in Resident 161's edema not being assessed by licensed staff from February 10, 2024 to February 12, 2024, which increased the potential for Resident 161 not to receive the proper care and treatment timely. Findings: On February 12, 2024, at 11:31 a.m., Resident 161 was observed lying in bed with eyes open. Resident 161 did not perform eye tracking during a verbal command. Resident 161 was observed with a tracheostomy (an opening in the windpipe to allow air to fill the lungs) tube, a gastrostomy tube (a feeding tube used to deliver a formula through the stomach), and on a respirator (a life-support machine). Resident 161 was observed with swelling on both arms and feet. Resident 161's arms were positioned on his sides without support and his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the enteral formula (EF - a form of nutrition that is delivered into the stomach as a liquid) was labeled with the date and time for one of six residents (Resident 45) receiving enteral formula. This failure had the potential for Resident 45 to experience complications from the formula, such as nausea, diarrhea, or infection. Findings: On February 12, 2024, at 9:50 a.m., Resident 45 was observed in bed with enteral formula feeding being delivered via pump. The EF container was observed with a blank label (no date and time of when it was hung.) On February 12, 2024, at 11:03 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was conducted. RN 1 observed Resident 45's EF container and stated the formula should be labeled and dated with the time once opened. RN 1 stated there was no way to tell when the EF was hung. RN 1 stated the risk of not dating the EF was that the resident could get an upset stomach, have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control prevention when Registered Nurse (RN) 3 did not wear gloves while handling a gastrostomy tube (G-tube - a tube inserted into the stomach to provide nutrition) for one resident (Resident 38). This failure had the potential to expose the vulnerable resident to infection. Findings: On February 14, 2024, at 11:31 a.m., Resident 38 was observed in bed. Resident 38 had a G-tube for nutrition and was receiving her medications via G-tube. On February 14, 2024, at 11:31 a.m., during the medication administration observation, RN 3 was observed handling the G-tube of Resident 38 without gloves. On February 14, 2024, at 12:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with RN 3. RN 3 confirmed she did not wear gloves when handling Resident 38's G-tube. RN 3 stated she should have worn gloves while handling Resident 38's G-tube. On February 14, 2024, at 12:30 p.m., a concurrent interview with the clinical manager (CM) 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the responsible party's declination for the COVID-19 vaccine for one of three residents, (Resident 1). This failure denied Resident 1's responsible party, (RP) to exercise her rights on behalf of Resident 1. Findings: On February 1, 2024, at 9 a.m., a telephone interview was conducted with Resident 1 ' s family member (FM). The FM stated she was the translator for Resident 1's responsible party (RP). The FM stated that in December 2023, while visiting with Resident 1, a nurse came into the room and asked if they wanted Resident 1 to have the COVID vaccine. The FM stated that the RP told the nurse no vaccinations. The FM stated that she went to the nurses' station and informed the staff that they did not want Resident 1 to have any vaccines. The FM stated the next day the RP received a phone call from the facility staff stating that Resident 1 had no adverse events from the COVID vaccine. The FM stated that the RP was very upset that Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse, to the state survey agency, ombudsman, and local law enforcement, within two hours for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in the delay of investigation and implementation of corrective action for Resident 1. Findings: On February 1, 2024, at 9 a.m., a telephone interview was conducted with Resident 1's family member (FM). The FM stated that she was translating for the responsible party (RP). The FM stated that Resident 1 complained of pain in the back of his head approximately two weeks ago. The FM stated that Resident 1 made a fist and stated he was punched in the head. The FM was unaware if the facility staff knew about the allegation. On February 7, 2024, at 11:30 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility for a complaint investigation was initiated. A review of Resident 1's medical records indicated he was admitted on [DATE], from a local general acute care facility with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2004 |
| MILLER, ALAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/09/2004 |
| COLEMAN, JAMES | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/09/2004 |
| MACHOKA, ALLISTAIR | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/07/2025 |
| TIONGSON, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| FILTON, STEVE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/09/2004 |
| SIM, EDWARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/05/2022 |
| BRUNNER, GEORGE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/09/2004 |
| KLEIN, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2010 |
| LYVER, KATHARINE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| RAMAGANO, CHERYL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/09/2004 |
| UHS OF DELAWARE INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2004 |
| AKHAVAN, RAMIN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/07/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555390. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.