Emanate Health Inter-Community Hospital- D/P SNF

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 376 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 25.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 139 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 25 beds and averages 18.5 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 3.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.48 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 4.09 to 3.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 15% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored under sanitary conditions by storing four one-gallon (liquid measurement) cartons of heavy cream in one of two walk-in refrigerators (Refrigerator 1) beyond the manufacturer's use-by date (the final date recommended by the maker for a consumer to use a product while it remains at peak quality, flavor, and texture) and as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food Supply and Storage Procedures.This deficient practice had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses (refers to illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) to the residents consuming the food prepared with heavy cream. Findings:During an initial kitchen tour observation on 5/26/2026 at 8:30 AM, Refrigerator 1 contained four one-gallon cartons of heavy cream labeled with a manufacturer's best-by date of 5/24/2026.During an interview on 5/28/2026 at 1:37 PM with the Executive Chef (EC), the EC stated food items stored beyond the manufacturer's use-by date should not be kept in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure room temperatures were between 71 degrees Fahrenheit ( F - temperature scale) to 81 F for two of two sampled residents (Resident 7 and Resident 30).This deficient practice resulted in Resident 30 feeling cold and the potential for discomfort to Resident 7 and Resident 30 due to the room's temperature.Findings:During a review of Resident 7's Inpatient Facesheet (IF, admission record), the IF indicated the facility admitted Resident 7 on 5/8/2026.During a review of Resident 7's History and Physical (H&P), date of admission 5/8/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 7 had diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive (condition characterized by poor appetite, loss of weight, increased fatigue and a progressive functional decline) with generalized weakness with poor oral intake, anemia (decrease in the total amount of red blood cells).During a review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 5/8/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 7 had severe deficit in cognition (ability to think…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dialysis emergency kit (a bag used to store emergency supplies) was kept at the bedside for one of one sampled resident (Resident 30), who was on dialysis (general term, a life-sustaining medical treatment that performs the essential functions of failing kidneys by filtering waste, toxins, and excess fluid from the blood) and as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Care of the Patient with an Arteriovenous Access.This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed emergency services and excessive bleeding to Resident 30 during an accidental pull out of the arteriovenous access catheter (a soft, flexible tube inserted into a large vein in the neck, chest, or groin serving as a temporary lifeline to draw and return blood during hemodialysis).Findings:During a review of Resident 30's Inpatient Facesheet (IF, admission record), the IF indicated the facility admitted Resident 30 on 5/19/2026.During a review of Resident 30's History and Physical (H&P), date of admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was not 5 percent or greater. Two medication errors were identified out of 25 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of eight percent. The facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders for two of seven sampled residents (Resident 17 and Resident 26) by failing to:A. Ensure Novolog (Insulin Aspart - a rapid-acting type of insulin [one of many hormones that helps the body turn food into energy]) was administered with meals in accordance with the physician's order to Resident 17. B. Ensure Coreg (Carvedilol - a medication used to lower blood pressure) was administered with meals in accordance with the physician's order to Resident 26. This deficient practice had the potential to result in ineffective treatment, adverse medication reactions (injuries resulting from medication use including physical and mental harm, or loss of function), fluctuations in blood glucose (a simple sugar and the body's primary source of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices by failing to:a. Ensure staff followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - extra measures, such as donning [putting on] a gown and gloves during high-contact care activities with residents who are at higher risk [have wounds] of having or spreading germs that are hard to treat) with Resident 27 during occupational therapy (OT - therapies used to increase independent function, and regain or build skills to perform every day activities).b. Ensure facility staff performed hand hygiene (HH) after patient care and prior to touching the curtains and blinds for Resident 30. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of microorganisms and cross contamination (the process by which microorganisms [microscopic living organisms that are too small to be seen with the human eye] are unintentionally transferred from one area/object to another with a harmful effect) possibly leading to nosocomial infections (an infection a resident acquires while receiving…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 11) had their urine collection bag fully covered. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 11 to feel embarrassed and feel a loss of dignity. Findings: During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the reason for visit was for aftercare following joint replacement. During a review of Resident 11's History and Physical (H&P) dated 4/11/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 11's chief complaint was aftercare following joint replacement and Resident 11 had a past medical history of colon (longest part of the large intestine [long tubed-shaped organ in the abdomen that completes the process of digestion [breakdown of food]) cancer (type of cancer that develops in the colon, which is the longest part of the large intestine), heart disease (problems with the heart's ability to pump blood properly) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 70) did not have more than three bed side rails while the bed was in the raised position. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 70 to feel trapped in Resident 70's bed. Findings: During a review of Resident 70's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and indicated the reason for visit was respiratory failure with hypoxia (when the lungs cannot provide the body with enough oxygen [colorless, odorless gas]) During a review of Resident 70's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/2/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 70 had multiple diagnoses including congestive heart failure (condition where the heart muscle weakens and can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs). During a review of Resident 70's current undated Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) provided by the facility, the MDS indicated Resident 70…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer/injury [PU/PI, localized injury to the skin and or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence as result of pressure or pressure in combination with shear (mechanical force that cause the skin to break off) and/or friction [movement of one surface of the skin against the others]) prevention interventions were implemented for one of two sampled residents (Resident 10) to minimize the risk of developing PIs. Additionally, the facility failed to treat Resident 10's existing moisture associated skin damage (MASD) by failing to: a. Ensure Resident 10's heels were not touching the mattress b. Ensure Resident 10 was turned every two hours c. Ensure the facility's protocol for MASD was implemented This deficient practice had the potential to result in the development of PIs to Resident 10 and result in further damage to Resident 10's skin, pain, discomfort, and an infection. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 10's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reassess the continued need for an indwelling urinary catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) and failed ensure a physician's order was obtained for the use of the device for 1 of five 5 sampled residents (Resident 121) upon admission from the intensive care unit (ICU, a special area in a hospital where patients receive very intensive care, including monitoring and treatment, for serious illnesses or injuries). Resident 121 remained with a urinary catheter for 2 days without a physician order indicating the medical necessity or indication in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Catheterization, Urinary, #C-110. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary invasive treatment and increased the risk for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs, germs enter the urinary tract through a urinary catheter and cause infection) to Resident 121. Findings: During…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to uphold its infection prevention and control program for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 119) by failing to inform Resident 119's family Resident 119 was on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, an approach to use Personal Protective Equipment [PPE, protective clothing or equipment, designed to protect the wearer from injury or the spread of infection or illness] to reduce transmission of multi-drug-resistant organism), the purpose of the precautions, and the appropriate times and procedures for donning (putting on) gowns. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the transmission of infectious microorganisms and increased the risk of infection for Resident 119. Findings: During a review of Resident 119's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 121 on 5/6/2025. During a review of Resident 119's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/6/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 119 had diagnoses including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA