No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Harvard Creek Post Acute

519 W. Badillo St., Covina, CA 91722 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (626) 915-5621 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (626) 915-5621 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Feb 2026
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
530 W Badillo St · (626) 858-5730 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
276 W College St · (626) 869-2474 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
114 N Azusa Ave · (626) 915-6619 · Call to confirm hours
Park
301 N 4th Ave · (626) 384-5340 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.3%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.7%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.9%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.4%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.1%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.8%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.8%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.6%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.0%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.8%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.892.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.651.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.23hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.1%CMS range 34.1–53.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.1–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.1–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.561.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
1.29
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.59
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 43.8 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.09 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.89 on weekdays — 3% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-13)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-20)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when facility nurses (in general) failed to monitor Resident 1's vital signs (objective, measurable, and essential physiological indicators, including temperature, pulse, respiration rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and often pain) after Resident 1 experienced a change in condition on 2/28/2026 at 6:21 PM.This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience a decline in health and wellbeing.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 2/20/2026 with diagnoses including pneumonia (infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 2/27/2026, the MDS indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement individualized and resident-centered care plans (CP) for two of two sampled residents (Residents 26 and 53).These deficient practices had the potential for Residents 26 and 53 to not receive appropriate care, treatment, and/or services related to their specific needs.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 26's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 26 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) and bronchitis (the air tubes in the lungs got swollen and made breathing hard). During a review of Resident 26's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/19/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 26 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 1/23/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 26 had moderately impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen handwashing sink was draining.This failure had the potential to result in overflow of wastewater and lead to contamination.Findings:During an observation on 2/10/2026 at 8:59 AM in the kitchen, the handwashing sink was half-full of soapy, dirty water. During an interview on 2/10/2026 at 9:00 AM with Dietary Supervisor (DS), DS stated the sink drains slow, it could be clogged. DS stated the sink should be draining smoothly otherwise it might overflow and contaminate surrounding kitchen area. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Policy: Plumbing Policy, updated 1/8/2026, the P&P indicated the facility's Environmental Services performs weekly checks of all kitchen sinks and drains, maintenance staff uses enzymatic solutions on monthly basis to prevent buildup, and staff is trained to report clogged or slow-draining sinks immediately.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain written informed consent for one of five sampled residents (Resident 53) for the use of psychotropic (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotion, and behavior) medication. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 53 not receiving adequate information regarding psychotropic medications necessary to make an informed health care decision. Findings: During a review of Resident 53's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including liver carcinoma (type of cancer), malignant neoplasm (group of diseases involving abnormal cell growth with the potential to invade or spread to other parts of the body) of the pancreas, and heart failure (condition when the heart is unable to pump sufficiently to maintain blood flow to meet the body's needs). During a review of Resident 53's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 10/9/2025, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the order for lorazepam (a medication used for anxiety- a feeling of fear, dread, or uneasiness) as needed (PRN) was limited to a 14-day duration for one of five sampled residents (Resident 5). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unnecessary or prolonged use of lorazepam that could lead to Resident 5 experiencing adverse effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects of a drug) related to medication therapy.Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 5 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood that affected the brain's normal functioning) and anxiety disorder. During a review of Resident 5's untitled (CP) for anti-anxiety medication revised on 1/25/2026, the CP goal indicated Resident 5 would be free from discomfort or adverse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete one of three sampled residents (Resident 41) quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool).This failure had the potential to result in not meeting the resident's care needs and/or identifying a change in the resident's physical and mental care needs.Findings:During a review of Resident 41's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 41 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to peripheral vascular disease (a decrease in blood flow to the limbs, primarily on the legs, causing cramps, pain, death of body tissue and amputation), diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition in which the body does not produce enough of the hormone insulin or becomes resistant to it leading to high blood sugar levels in the body), protein-calorie malnutrition (an insufficient intake of protein and calories leading to loss of muscle mass, strength and immune function).During a review of Resident 41's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident's (Resident 43), Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 12/24/2025 accurately documented the resident's dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidneys have failed) treatment. This failure had the potential to result in delay of treatment and inaccurate plan of care and interventions for Resident 43. Findings: During a review of Resident 43's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure (when the heart muscle can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen), End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD-irreversible kidney failure), and dependence on dialysis. During a review of Resident 43's Care Plan (CP) revised on 7/24/2025, the CP indicated Resident 43 needed hemodialysis related to ESRD. During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 43)'s care plan (CP) was revised to address 1,000 milliliters (ml- unit of measurement) fluid restriction. This failure had the potential to place Resident 43 at risk for fluid overload and other related complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 43's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure (when the heart muscle can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen), End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD-irreversible kidney failure), and dependence on dialysis ( procedure to remove wastes or toxins from the blood and adjust fluid and electrolyte imbalances). During a review of Resident 43's Care Plan (CP) revised on 7/24/2025, the CP indicated Resident 43 had dehydration or had the potential for fluid deficit related to ESRD, being on hemodialysis (HD- a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the suprapubic catheter (a soft tube inserted directly into the bladder through a small incision to drain urine into a bag) bag was not touching the floor for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in contamination of Resident 1's care equipment and placed the resident at risk of infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including encounter for urinary tract infection (UTI- infection that affects part of the urinary tract), encounter for fitting and adjustment of urinary device and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (lack of bladder control). During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 1/7/2026, the OSR indicated suprapubic catheter 22 (size of the catheter) French (a type of catheter) per 10 milliliters (ml, unit of measurement) attached to bedside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer continuous oxygen therapy (treatment that provides supplemental, or extra, oxygen) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 15) according to accepted standards of clinical practice and in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Oxygen Administration. This deficient practice placed Resident 15 at risk for shortness of breath and/or hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues) which could lead to serious complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 15 on 1/7/2026 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- a type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long term poor airflow) and dependence of supplemental oxygen. During a review of Resident 15's Physician Order (PO) dated 1/7/2026, the PO indicated for licensed staff to administer two (2) liters per minute (L/min) of oxygen via nasal cannula (tube which on one end splits into two prongs which are placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hemodialysis (HD - a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) device access dressing was removed as ordered by the physician for one of one sampled resident (Resident 43).This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 43 to develop complications related to HD device access.Findings:During a review of Resident 43's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 43 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD - irreversible kidney failure), dependence on renal hemodialysis, and congestive heart failure (CHF - a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently).During a review of Resident 43's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 7/20/2025, the OSR indicated Resident 43 had an order for hemodialysis on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays with extra…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 19) was properly identified during Resident 19's medication administration. This failure had the potential to result in medication errors from Resident 19 receiving incorrect medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 19's History & Physical (H&P) dated 4/25/2025, the H&P indicated the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 1/23/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 19 had intact cognition (ability to understand). During a Medication Administration observation on 2/12/2026 at 8:11 am in Resident 19's room, Resident 19 was lying in bed and did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow infection prevention procedures to prevent the transmission of infectious organisms for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to wear required personal protective equipment (PPE, equipment that protects people from injury or illness in hazardous environments) while providing care to Resident 1 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP, precautions that involve using a glove and gown during high-contact resident care activity for residents who are colonized or infected with multidrug-resistant organisms [MDRO, bacteria that is resistant to many types of antibiotics] and those at a higher risk of developing a MDRO, such as, residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices). This deficient practice had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection to Resident 1 and staff that could result in a widespread infection in the facility. Findings: During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), received appropriate treatment to prevent further decrease in Resident 1's range of motion (ROM, the full movement potential of a joint or body part) in Resident 1's left shoulder. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing pain and joint stiffness on Resident 1's left shouder due to a decrease in range of motion. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 11/29/2019 and readmitted Resident 1 on 6/10/2022 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body that can affect the arms, legs, and facial muscles) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to incorporate Assessments and Care Planning Goals and Objectives in the Care Plans that lead to the residents' highest obtainable level of independence for one of five residents (Resident 1). Resident 1's care plan did not include Resident 1's behavior of crawling on the floor. This failure result in no nursing interventions for Resident 1's behavior of crawling on the floor and placed Resident 1 at risk for not reaching Resident 1's highest obtainable level of independence. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 2/7/2025 with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (also called ischemic stroke, occurs as result of disrupted blood flow to the brain) and cognitive communication deficit (impaired attention, memory, perception, organization, language, and lack of coordination, symptoms and signs involving the musculoskeletal system). A review of Resident 1's fall risk care plan (CP), dated 2/7/2025, the CP indicated Resident 1 was at risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its Policy and Procedure, titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Resident 1 was not assessed for injury whenever staff (in general) found Resident 1 on floor crawling on the floor mats (a padded cushion placed on the floor next to the bed to help reduce injuries from a fall) as indicated in Resident 1's fall risk care plan. 2. Resident 1's care plan did not include Resident 1's behavior of crawling on the floor. 3. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not document Resident 1's wander guard trial in Resident 1's medical record. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for harm and injury. Cross reference F656, F842 Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 2/7/2025 with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (also called ischemic stroke, occurs as result of disrupted blood flow to the brain) and cognitive communication deficit (impaired attention, memory, perception, organization,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its Policy and Procedure titled, Charting and Documentation, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when: Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) did not document Resident 1's wander guard trial in Resident 1's medical record. This failure result in incomplete documentation for Resident 1 and placed Resident 1's inter disciplinary team at risk for miscommunication regarding the Resident 1's condition and response to care. Cross Reference: F689 and F656 Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 2/7/2025 with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (also called ischemic stroke, occurs as result of disrupted blood flow to the brain) and cognitive communication deficit (impaired attention, memory, perception, organization, language, and lack of coordination, symptoms and signs involving the musculoskeletal system). A review of Resident 1's fall risk care plan (CP), dated 2/7/2025, the CP indicated Resident 1 was at risk for falls…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's order to collect a stool sample for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential for a delay of care and services to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 3/25/2024, and recently admitted Resident 1 on 11/27/2024, with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious medical condition that occurs when the body does not have enough oxygen in its tissues), end stage renal disease (irreversible kidney failure), and dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment that removes waste and extra fluid from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 12/2/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 was understood by others and had the ability to usually understand others. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for three of three sampled residents (Residents 13, 17 and 35). These deficient practices had the potential for the residents not to receive necessary care or receive delayed services to meet the residents' needs that could result in a fall or injury. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 17's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 17 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints caused by gradual loss of cartilage), epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed causing seizures) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a chronic lung diseases causing difficulty in breathing). During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 9/6/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 17 had severely impaired cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its Policy and Procedure (P&P) on the use of side rails/bed rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars attached to the bed) for three of three sampled residents (Residents 21, 33 and 48) by failing to: a. (1). Ensure appropriate alternative interventions were attempted before the installation of side rails for Resident 21. (2). Assess Resident 21 for risk of entrapment (an event in which a resident is caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed rail) and obtained an informed consent to review the risks and benefits prior to installing bed rails. b. Ensure appropriate alternative interventions were attempted and did not meet the needs of Resident 33 before the installation of side rails. c. Ensure appropriate alternative interventions were attempted and did not meet the needs of Resident 48 before the installation of side rails. These failures placed Residents 21, 33 and 48 at risk for entrapment, injury or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food handling practices by failing to ensure food items were dated when it was first opened in one of two facility refrigerators. This deficient practice had the potential risk for food borne illnesses (infections caused by ingesting contaminated food or beverages) to the residents. Findings: During an observation and initial tour of the kitchen on 12/17/2024 at 9:24 am, together with the Lead [NAME] (LC), one unlabeled bag of tortilla and 2 pound (lbs.- unit of measurement) open bag of corn tortilla did not have a label or date when it was first opened, inside one facility refrigerator. The LC stated the bags of tortillas were not labeled nor dated when it was first opened. The LC stated the staff who opened the food item needed to label it with the date opened to keep track of how long the food item was opened. During an interview on 12/18/2024 at 12:01 pm with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated, all food items needed to have a label with date opened to determine the use by date and to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 21) was informed in advance, of the risks and benefits of a psychoactive medication (a drug that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness, or behavior). This failure violated the residents' right to make an informed decision regarding the use of a psychoactive medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 21's History & Physical (H&P) dated 6/12/2024, the H&P indicated the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 21's Order Summary Report (OSR-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) reflected an accurate assessment for one of one resident (Resident 51). This failure resulted in inaccurate reporting to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, a federal agency that administers the Medicare program and works with state governments to administer the Medicaid and health insurance portability standards) agency and had the potential for Resident 51 not to receive interventions to address the resident's specific care concerns. Findings: During a review of Resident 51's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included surgical aftercare (the treatment and care the patient received after surgery) following surgery on the digestive system (group of organs that work together to digest and absorb nutrients from food) and chronic kidney disease (progressive damage and loss of function of the kidneys).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize bilateral landing mats as ordered, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 13) who had a history of falls. This deficient practice had the potential to result in serious consequences that may accompany a fall for Resident 13. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (disease that affects the nerve cells in the brain that produces symptoms that include muscle rigidity, tremors, and changes in speech and gait) without dyskinesia (a movement disorder that involves involuntary muscle movements) and unspecified dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning). During a review of Resident 13's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 2/27/2022, the OSR indicated for staff to place bilateral floormat for fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 40) received two liters of oxygen as needed according to physician's order and monitor the resident's oxygen usage in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications associated with oxygen therapy for Resident 40. Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), respiratory failure (a condition caused by inadequate supply of oxygen and/or the inability to remove carbon dioxide from the lungs), and urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in the bladder/urinary tract). During a review of Resident 40's Order Summary Report (OSR) of Active Orders dated 7/15/2024, the OSR indicated Resident 40 had an order for two liters per minute (L/min) of oxygen via (through)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases for a resident on hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) with indwelling medical device placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, infection control measures used to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs] in healthcare settings) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 44). This failure had the potential to expose Resident 44 to infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated Resident 44 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD, irreversible kidney failure) hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement fall intervention to utilize bilateral landing mats for two of two sampled residents (Resident 15 and Resident 17) who had history of falls as indicated in residents care plan titled Fall Risk. These deficient practices had the potential to result in serious consequences like fractures (break in the bone) and bleeding that may accompany with falls. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 15's admission record indicated, the facility admitted Resident 15 on 11/14/2021 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (an age-related brain condition that affects movement resulting in lack of coordination and tremors) and unspecified dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning). During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 11/16/2023, the MDS indicated, Resident 15's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen therapy (treatment that provides supplemental oxygen) for three of three sampled residents (Residents 199, 149 and 8) according to standards of practice and with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Oxygen Therapy. a. Resident 199 did not receive two liters of oxygen as ordered by the physician. b. Resident 149 received continuous oxygen therapy without a physician's order. c. Resident 8 received continuous oxygen therapy without a physician's order. These deficient practices placed Residents 199, 149 and 8 at risk for shortness of breath and/or hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues) which can lead to serious complications. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 199's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 199 on 12/12/2023 with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- a type of obstructive lung disease characterized by long…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide bilateral handsocks (a type of glove that covers the hands) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 8) in accordance with the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 1's self-esteem (self-worth) and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 8's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (progressive loss of intellectual functioning, impairment of memory and thinking) and contracture (shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons and other tissue leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) of the left elbow. During a review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS- standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 10/20/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 8 had severely impaired cognition (ability to understand) and was totally dependent on staff with oral hygiene, toileting, shower,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light (an alerting device for staff to assist a resident in need) was within reach for one of one sampled resident (Resident 42). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 42 not receiving care and assistance in a timely manner. Findings: During a review of Resident 42's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 42 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included difficulty walking, muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass) and malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain cancer). During a review of Resident 42's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/9/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 42 had clear speech, had ability to express ideas and wants and had ability to understand others. The MDS indicated Resident 42 was cognitively intact (able to think and reason). The MDS indicated Resident 42 required substantial/maximal assistance (helper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to provide information of advance care planning (a process of communication between individuals and their healthcare agents to understand, reflect on, discuss, and plan for future healthcare decisions for a time when individuals are not able to make their own healthcare decisions.) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 42). This deficient practice had the potential for facility staff to provide treatment against the resident's will. Findings: During a review of Resident 42's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 42 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included difficulty walking, muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass) and malignant neoplasm of brain (brain cancer). During a review of Resident 42's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/9/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 42 had clear speech, had ability to express ideas and wants and had ability to understand others.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and home like environment for one of one sampled resident (Resident 42). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 42 not residing in a comfortable environment that could affect Resident 42's quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 42's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 42 on 10/2/2023, with diagnoses that included difficulty walking, muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass), and malignant neoplasm of brain (brain cancer). During a review of Resident 42's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/9/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 42 had clear speech, had ability to express ideas and wants and had ability to understand others. Resident 42 was cognitively intact (able to think, reasoning and organize). Resident 42 required substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort, helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized a person-centered plan of care (details why a person is receiving care, assessed health or care needs, medical history, personal details, expected and aimed outcomes, and what care and support will be delivered, how, when and by whom) with measurable objectives and interventions to meet the residents' needs for one of one sampled resident (Resident 5) as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 5 not to receive appropriate care, treatment and/or services. Finding: During a review of Resident 5's admission record, the admission record indicated, the facility readmitted Resident 5 on 11/26/2023 with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning) with mood disturbance and Alzheimer's Disease (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to revise a plan of care for one of one sampled resident (Resident 15), who sustained a fall from his bed on 9/25/2023 as indicated in the facility's policy Care Plans, Comprehensive. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 15 at risk for recurrent falls. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission record indicated, the facility admitted Resident 15 on 11/14/2021 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (an age-related brain condition that affects movement resulting in lack of coordination and tremors) and unspecified dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning). During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 11/16/2023, the MDS indicated, Resident 15's cognition for daily decision making was severely impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 15 required total dependence with eating, oral and toileting hygiene, shower, upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an effective communication method for one of one non-English speaking sampled resident (Resident 18). This failure had the potential for Resident 18 to not receive the necessary care and services due to the lack of effective communication aids. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 18 on 9/29/2023, with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease that occurs when the blood sugar is too high). During a review of Resident 18's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 11/20/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 18 had clear speech, usually understood others, and usually made self-understood. The MDS indicated Resident 18 was dependent (helper does all of the effort, resident does none of the effort to complete the activity) on staff for eating, personal hygiene,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assign a designated staff to coordinate with hospice care (end of life care) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 42). This failure had the potential for Resident 42 to not receive individualized compassionate care that could affect Resident 42's quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 42's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 42 on 10/2/2023, with diagnoses that included difficulty walking, muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass), and malignant neoplasm of brain (brain cancer). During a review of Resident 42's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/9/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 42 had clear speech, ability to express ideas and wants, and ability to understand others. Resident 42 was cognitively intact (able to think, reasoning and organize). Resident 42 required substantial/maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort, helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to set up Gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) feeding of Fibersource HN (nutritionally complete tube feeding formula) via pump (a machine used to infuse nutrition formula through G-Tube to the stomach) for one of four sampled residents with tube feeding (Resident 28). This failure had the potential to result in weight loss and malnutrition for Resident 28 and could affect Resident 28's health condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 28's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility readmitted Resident 28 on 12/15/2022, with diagnoses that included gastrointestinal hemorrhage (bleeding in digestive tract) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/31/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 28 had clear speech, usually understood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance evaluation for at least once every 12 months for one of two sampled Certified Nursing Assistants 3 (CNA 3). This failure had the potential for the facility to not be aware of CNA 3's competency skills and techniques and miss the opportunity to provide the necessary in-service education specific to CNA 3's performance which could negatively affect the provision of care to residents. Findings: During a review of CNA 3's personnel file and Employee Evaluation Report, the report indicated CNA 3 had a general performance evaluation on 3/7/2022. There was no evaluation report for 2023 in CNA 3's personnel file. During an interview on 12/21/2023 at 10:21 am with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD stated CNA 3's last performance evaluation was completed on 3/7/2022 and there was no performance evaluation completed for CNA 3 in 2023. DSD stated, CNA 3's annual performance evaluation should have been completed in 3/2023. DSD stated, performance evaluation should be done at least every 12 months for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon the pharmacist's monthly medication regimen review (MRR, a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences associated with medication) recommendation to obtain an informed consent for the use of Venlafaxine (medication used to treat depression, anxiety disorder and panic disorder) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 38) on psychotropic medication (medication that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 38 receiving an unnecessary medication and could prevent Resident 38 from maintaining the resident's highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 38 on 9/20/2023, with diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease in which there is a high level of sugar in the blood)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nasal cannula (NC, small flexible tube with two prongs that sit inside the nostrils to deliver supplemental oxygen) was labeled and dated, the tubing was not touching the floor, and the NC prongs were not touching the oxygen humidifier (device used to provide moistened oxygen) when not in use for one of three sampled residents (Resident 20) on oxygen therapy in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled, Oxygen Therapy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an increased risk of spread of infection to the residents, staff, and other visitors in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 199's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 199 on 12/12/2023, with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a chronic inflammatory lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). During a review of Resident 199's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/15/2023, the H&P indicated, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-02-13 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information on the Nurse Staffing Sheet (posted information that contains the facility's current resident census and total number and actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff) was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. This deficient practice had the potential to mislead the residents and visitors that may affect the quality of nursing care provided to the residents. Findings: During observations on 2/11/2026 at 9:27 am the Nurse Staffing Sheet was only posted on an enclosed bulletin board across from Nursing Station 2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/12/2026 at 1:10 pm with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the Nurse Staffing Sheet was posted on the bulletin board across from Nursing Station 2. The DSD stated there were no other postings within the facility which didn't allow it to be readily accessible to all residents and visitors. The DSD further stated posting the Nurse Staffing Sheet where it was accessible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet (sq. ft., unit of measurement) per resident area for eighteen (18) out of twenty-four (24) resident rooms (Rooms 101, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, and 122). This deficient practice had the potential to impact the ability to provide safe nursing care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During an interview with the facility's Administrator (ADM) on 2/10/2026 at 9:26 am, the ADM stated the facility would like to request a room waiver (a document recording the waiving of a right or claim) for Rooms 101, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, and 122. The ADM stated nothing was changed and the number of bed occupancy in the 18 rooms. During a review of the facility's letter to request for room waiver dated 2/10/2026, the room waiver request indicated there was ample room to accommodate wheelchairs (a chair fitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the 80 square feet (sq. ft., a unit area of measurement) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms requirement for 18 of 24 resident rooms (Rooms 101,103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119 and 122) in the facility. This failure had the potential to affect residents' privacy and result in the residents not having adequate space for nursing care and emergency services. Findings: During an observation on 12/17/2024 at 10:41 am in Station 1 and 2, Rooms 101,103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 110, 111, 112, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, and 119 had 2 beds inside. Rooms 108, 109 and 122 had 4 beds inside. The residents and staff were able to move wheelchairs, front wheel walkers and shower chairs in the rooms and provide care to the residents without difficulty and with enough space. During an interview on 12/18/2024 at 10:22 am with the facility's Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated the facility had 18 out of 24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the 80 square feet (sq. ft., a unit area of measurement) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms requirement for 18 of 24 resident rooms (Rooms 101, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119 and 122) in the facility. This failure had the potential to affect residents' privacy and result in the residents not having adequate space for nursing care and emergency services. Findings: During an interview on 12/19/2023 at 9:39 am with the administrator (ADM), the ADM stated the facility had 18 out of 24 resident rooms that did not meet the minimum requirement of 80 sq. ft. per resident in multiple resident rooms. The ADM submitted a room waiver for the 18 rooms. During an observation on 12/19/2023 at 2:14 pm in Station 1 and 2, rooms 101, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 110, 111, 112, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, and 119 had 2 beds inside. Rooms 108, 109 and 122 had 4 beds inside. The residents and staff were able to move wheelchairs in the rooms and provide care without difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BHATIA, SONAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER50%since 02/13/2019
CHRISTIAN, CANNYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 02/01/2019
PADAONG, NEVELINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+2.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 24%Other / private 12%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$435per resident / day
operating cost
$13,213per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$448per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055544. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next