Marycrest Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 91 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 45.8 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.15 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.34 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for 43 of 44 medically compromised and vulnerable residents who received food from the kitchen: Ensure food items were labelled with opened and use by dates.Ensure dented cans were separated from useable stock and placed in specified labeled area. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (a transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another or one object to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (an illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, and other toxins). Findings: 1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/6/2026 at 8:38 a.m., with Cook (CK) 1 in the kitchen, there were food items with no open or use-by date as follows: Opened and used caesar dressing without opened date or used by date. Cajun seasoning with opened date of 4/21/2025, missing used by date. Low sodium soy sauce with opened date of 9/29/2025, missing used by date. CK 1 stated dietary staff are responsible for labeling all food items with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had an alternative system of notification of lunch menu substitutions when an overhead page was not heard by three of three sampled residents. (Resident 4, Resident 23 and Resident 24). This deficient practice had the potential for residents to not be notified and substitutions and preferences to not be honored. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/6/2026 at 11:55 a.m. with [NAME] 1 (CK1) in the kitchen, the food prepared for lunch was observed. CK1 stated the lunch dessert cranberry crunch square was substituted with raspberry parfait and the lunch vegetable broccoli was substituted with sauteed spinach. CK1 stated per facility policy, residents must be notified when substitutions to the menu are made. During an interview on 1/7/2026 at 3:00 p.m. with Resident 4, Resident 4 stated she was not notified of the vegetable or dessert change for the lunch menu on 1/6/2026. Resident 4 stated she would like to be notified when changes to the menu are made so that she can…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure therapeutic menu (meal plan that controls the intake of certain foods or nutrients) portion sizes were followed for 43 of 44 medically compromised and vulnerable residents who received food from the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for not having nutritional needs met and potential weight gain. Findings: During an observation on 1/6/2026 at 11:55 a.m. in the kitchen, [NAME] (CK) 1 was observed scooping polenta onto resident's plates using one half cup scoop size. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/6/2026 at 12:20 p.m. with [NAME] (CK) 1, the therapeutic menu spreadsheet dated 1/6/2026 was reviewed. The therapeutic menu spreadsheet indicated polenta to be served with a one third cup scoop size for a regular sized diet. CK 1 stated one third cup scoop size should have been used for residents on regular portion diet. CK 1 stated serving larger portions of food places residents at risk for unintended weight gain. During an interview on 1/8/2026…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:1. Submit and transmit the Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) within the regulatory timeframe to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Service (CMS) for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 3).This deficient practice had the potential to result in billing error and inaccurate data on resident care needs.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 3's diagnoses included left femur fracture (break in the thigh bone), osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage) of both hips, and osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to lack of calcium and Vitamin D).During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/8/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 3 can make needs known but could not make medical decisions.During a review Resident 3's MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) assessment was completed accurately for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 14) by failing to:1. Ensure Resident 14's Plavix (classified as antiplatelet agent drug used to prevent blood clots) was not encoded as anticoagulant (blood thinner) medication.This failure resulted in incorrect data being transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and had the potential to negatively affect the plan of care and delivery of care and services for Resident 14.Findings:During a review of Resident 14's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 14 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 14's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for two of 12 sampled residents (Residents 5 and 14) by failing to:Address Resident 5's diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbance in thought).Address Resident 14's allergy to aspirin (drug used to reduce pain, fever, and prevent blood clot).This deficient practice had the potential to result in a lack of meeting necessary care and addressing medical needs for Resident 5 and Resident 14.Findings: A. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 5 on 8/2/2017 and was readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection), peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a slow progressive narrowing of the blood flow to the arms and legs), metabolic encephalopathy(a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood), atrial fibrillation (AFib…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident (Resident 7)'s mouth was rinsed after administration of prescribed inhaler Arnuity Ellipta [an inhaler used as a maintenance medication for asthma (a condition that causes the respiratory airways to swell up, shrink, and fill with mucus)].This failure had the potential to result in Resident 7's developing irritation of the mouth, discomfort, and an increased risk of infection of the mouth and throat due to medication remaining in the mouth after inhaler use.Findings:During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 7 on 5/14/2024 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), morbid obesity (serious disease that involves excess body fat that increases risk of health problems), obstructive sleep apnea (a sleep disorder when breathing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:1. Document the medical appointment for one of one sampled resident (Resident 14).This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 14 of not receiving appropriate care and delay in communication among staff due to incomplete medical records.Findings:During a review of Resident 14's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 14 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 14's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and atherosclerotic heart disease (buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in and on the artery walls).During a review of Resident 14's History and Physical (H&P), dated 6/9/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 14 can make needs known but could not make medical decisions.During a review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain and notify the dietary supervisor of the temperature being out of range in one of the walk-in refrigerators during the month of February. This deficient practice had the potential for food spoilage and can cause foodborne pathogens in the residents. Findings: During a review of the Refrigerator Temperature Log, dated February 2025, it indicated the walk-in refrigerator located towards the back of the kitchen for February 2025 had the following temperatures recorded: 44 Fahrenheit ( F- measurement of temperature) on 2/6 at 5:00 a.m. 42 F on 2/8 at 5:30 a.m. 45 F on 2/10 at 5:30 a.m. 45 F on 2/11 at 5:40 a.m. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/16/2025 at 9:30 a.m. with Kitchen Aide (KA), the Refrigerator Temperature Log for February 2025 was reviewed. KA stated that the individual who arrives the earliest, usually around 5:30 a.m. would check the temperatures of the refrigerator and freezer and record it on the temperature log. KA stated they check it when they first come in because the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) was completed accurately for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 18) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 18's Depakote (an anticonvulsant used to treat seizure disorder and other psychiatric conditions) medication was encoded as anticonvulsant and reflected in the MDS assessment under Section N (N0415 High-Risk Drug Classes) medication. This deficient practice resulted in incorrect data transmitted to Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) related to inappropriate MDS care screening and assessment tool practices. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated, Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated, Resident 18's diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $641K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA