No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Capistrano Beach Care Center

35410 Del Rey, Dana Point, CA 92624 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 93 certified beds · (949) 496-5786 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (949) 496-5786 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2023Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0568)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (81) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
655 Camino de los Mares · (949) 257-2315 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
665 Camino de los Mares · (949) 496-0123 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Ralphs0.6 mi
638 Camino de los Mares · (949) 496-8616 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2916 Via San Gorgonio · (949) 361-8264 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
35522 Camino Capistrano · (949) 496-2621

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.2%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.5%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.9%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.2%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.9%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.5%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.3%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.8%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.4%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.292.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.651.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 136 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.63U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.27hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.27hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 115 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.6%CMS range 49.8–62.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 8.2–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge73.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 4.7–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.351.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.33
RN hours/ resident / day
1.30
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.48
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
45.4%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 93 beds and averages 79.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.27 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

24
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-19)
25
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

81 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 71 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was accurate. * Resident 1's PICC line dressing and Stat Lock were documented as being changed on 5/22/26; however, they were last changed on 5/15/26. This failure contributed to delay in Resident 1's PICC line dressing and Stat-lock to be changed as ordered by the physician.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Charting and Documentation revised 7/2017 showed the medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. Further review of the P&P also showed treatments or services performed should be documented in the resident medical record. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 5/27/26. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's H&P examination dated 5/11/26, showed Resident 1 had the capacity to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were implemented for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). * Resident 1's PICC line dressing and StatLock were not changed as ordered by the physician. This failure placed Resident 1 at increased risk for developing a central line-associated bloodstream infection related to the PICC line.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Central Venous Catheter Care and Dressing Changes revised 3/2022 showed the purpose of the procedure is to prevent complications associated with intravenous therapy including catheter related infections that are associated with contaminated, loosened, soiled, or wet dressings. Further review of the P&P also showed to maintain a sterile dressing and to change it if it becomes damp, loosened, or visibly soiled. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 5/27/26. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed. 1. One of 14 kitchen employees did not perform hand hygiene during food preparation.2. The sanitizing test strips were not available to test the sanitizing solution and sanitizing solution log was incomplete.3. The residents' nutritional supplements were not stored appropriately.4. The hair restraints were not utilized by kitchen staff.5. The food stored in the nourishment refrigerator was not stored at the proper temperature.6. The employee's personal items were not stored appropriately.7. The expired food was not discarded and food was not dated.8. The food in the nourishment refrigerator was not dated.9. The food was not covered in the walk-in freezer.10. One of fourteen kitchen employees was observed eating in the kitchen.11. The food in the dry storage area was not stored appropriately.12. The ice packs intended for residents' personal use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their infection control program in accordance with the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to implement their infection control surveillance program for the months of January through November 2025. The facility conducted surveillance of resident infections based on whether the residents were prescribed antimicrobial medications. The facility failed to determine whether the residents who exhibited signs and symptoms of infection and were not prescribed antimicrobial medications met the facility's criteria for infection (utilizing McGeer's Criteria) and thus, failed to include these residents in the facility's infection control surveillance program. This failure posed the risk for not identifying the residents' infections and controlling the potential transmission of communicable diseases to other residents throughout the facility. * The facility failed to establish specific testing protocols and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the essential equipment was maintained in proper working condition. * The kitchen walk-in freezer had ice build-up which prevented the door from closing completely. * The walk-in refrigerator fan cover had black debris and brown residue resembling rust. * The floor tiles under the kitchen oven were not intact and clean. These failures had the potential for the equipment to not function the way it was intended.Findings: According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Chapter 4 Equipment, Utensils, and Linens, Section 4-501.11 Good Repair and Proper Adjustment, equipment shall be properly maintained. 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Procedure for Freezer Storage dated 2023 showed the freezer doors are to close tightly to prevent storage temperature fluctuations. Review of the facility's document titled Sanitation and Food Safety Checklist dated 6/16/25, completed by RD 1 showed there was ice build up on the freezer door and was not able to fully close. Review of the facility's document titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitation in the kitchen was maintained. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen was free from flies. This failure posed the risk for the pests to contaminate the residents' food.Findings: Review of the facility's Matrix showed 77 residents consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Review of the facility's P&P titled Miscellaneous Areas dated 2023 showed the flies are carriers of disease and are a constant enemy of high standards of sanitation in the Food and Nutrition Services Department. Review of the facility's P&P title Sanitation dated 2023 showed monthly a pest control company will inspect and service the Food and Nutrition Services department. Review of the facility's documents from a pest elimination company dated 6/18, 8/5, and 9/8/25, showed the pests treated/inspected for were for flies. On 9/29/25 at 0827 and 0910 hours, an observation was conducted during the initial kitchen tour. The door to the kitchen was adjacent to the back door of the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to inform and provide the written information regarding the rights to formulate the advance directives for three of 23 final sampled residents (Residents 20, 46, and 63). * The facility failed to provide documented evidence if the written information and assistance on how to formulate an advanced directive were provided Residents 20, 46, and 63 when the residents did not have an advance directive. This failure had the potential for the residents to not receive the treatment and services based on the residents' wishes. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Advance Directives revised on 9/2022 showed the following: - the residents have the right to formulate an advance directive, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment. Advance Directives are honored in accordance with state law and facility policy; - prior to or upon admission of a resident, the SSD or designee inquires of the resident,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the information on how to file a grievance was provided to one final sampled resident (Resident 16) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 48) who participated in the Resident Council meeting. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 16 and 48 was informed on how to file a grievance. This failure had the potential to cause the residents feeling hopeless and may negatively affect their emotional well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Investigating Grievances/Complaints dated 11/2010 showed the facility investigate all grievances and complaints filed with the facility. The investigation report form must be filed with the Administrator or designee and begin investigating grievances and complaints. Copies of all reports will be available to the resident or person acting on behalf of the resident. On 9/30/25 at 1029 hours, a Resident Council Meeting was conducted with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of six final sampled residents (Residents 46) reviewed for the unnecessary medications were free from the unnecessary medications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 46's was monitored for the side effects of paroxetine HCl (antidepressant medication). In addition, the facility failed to show documentation of the behavior monitoring for depression. These failures had the potential for the resident to not receive the necessary care due to the delay in the detection of adverse effects and determination of the effectiveness of the psychotropic medication.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic Medication Use dated 7/2022 showed the psychotropic medication management includes adequate monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences; residents receiving psychotropic medications are monitored for adverse consequences. Medical record review for Resident 46 was initiated on 11/17/25. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for the resident to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 4). * The facility failed to ensure the 72 hours monitoring following a change of condition for Resident 4 was completed. This failure posed the risk of the residents not receiving the appropriate care and potential for the delay in providing the necessary care to the residents.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised on 2/2021 showed the following:- our facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical or mental condition and status;- prior to notifying the physician or healthcare provider, the nurse will make detailed observations and gather relevant and pertinent information for the provider including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 71 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the resident remained free from accident hazards for one of 23 final sampled resident (Resident 2). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2 was supervised in Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]. In addition, Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] had no call system available to call the staff for assistance if needed. These failures had the potential to place the resident at risk for accidents and serious injury.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Bath, Shower/Tub revised 2/2018 showed to never leave the resident unattended in the tub or shower and to use the emergency call signal for assistance, if needed. Review of the facility's P&P titled Call System, Residents dated 9/2022 showed the residents are provided with a means to call the staff for assistance from his/her bed and from toileting/bathing facilities through a communication system that directly call a staff member or a centralized workstation. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document and P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the acceptable parameters of nutritional status were maintained for one of four final sampled residents (Resident 72) ) reviewed for nutrition status. * The facility failed to ensure the nutritional assessment was completed when Resident 72 weighed 174 pounds (lbs) on 4/8/25. In addition, the facility failed to monitor Resident 72's weight and implemented interventions to address Resident 72's severe weight loss. * The facility failed to conduct a nutritional assessment in a timely manner when Resident 72 weighed 160 lbs on 8/4/25. In addition, the facility failed to closely monitor Resident 72's weight. * The facility failed to ensure the nutritional assessment was completed when Resident 72 weight 155 lbs on 10/3/25. In addition, the facility failed to monitor Resident 72's weekly weights as ordered by the physician. These failures contributed to Resident 72's severe weight loss of 45 lbs/22.50% since admission on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for two of two final sampled residents (Residents 13 and 14) reviewed for oxygen therapy. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 13 received oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician's order. * The facility failed to ensure the oxygen tubing for Resident 14 was labeled with the date. These failures had the potential for the residents not to receive the appropriate respiratory care and may negatively impact the residents' medical conditions.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration revised 10/2010 showed under the preparation section, to verify there is a physician's order for this procedure and to review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Oxygen therapy is administered by way of an oxygen mask, nasal cannula, and/or nasal catheter. The nasal cannula is a tube that is placed approximately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to meet the resident's needs for three of three final sampled residents (Resident 2, 20, and 69) reviewed for the unnecessary medications. * The facility failed to ensure the insulin (medication to lower the blood sugar) injection administration sites were rotated for Residents 2 and 20. * The facility failed to ensure the Zosyn (antibiotic) IV medication was administered to Resident 69. These failures had the potential for the residents to not receive the necessary medications and could negatively affect the residents' well- being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Insulin Administration revised on 9/2014 showed the following: - to provide guidelines for the safe administration of insulin to residents with diabetes; - select an injection site. Insulin may be injected into the subcutaneous tissue of the upper arm and anterior or lateral areas of the thighs and abdomen. Avoid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (nonsampled resident, Resident 40) observed for medication administration was free from the significant medication errors. * LVN 5 did not check the resident's pulse rate prior to the administration of the metoprolol (a medication to lower blood pressure) to Resident 40. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's health and well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Oral Medications revised 10/2010 showed to verify that there is a physician's medication order for this procedure and perform any pre-administration assessments. On 10/1/25 at 0828 hours, a medication administration observation for Resident 40 was conducted with LVN 5. LVN 5 was observed checking Resident 40's blood pressure prior to the medication administration, then prepared Resident 40's medications including the metoprolol 12.5 mg one tablet. The metoprolol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medications/supplies in the medication room and medication cart were store properly. * The facility failed to ensure the expired Covid-19 Binax Now (a test to detect Covid-19) were removed from Medication Room A. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the oral medications were stored separately from the externally used medications. * The facility failed to ensure the expired bottles of the 0.9% normal saline solutions were removed from Medication Cart A. These failures had the potential for medication errors and the use of the expired medications/supplies which could negatively impact the residents' well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Storage in the Facility (undated) showed the outdated, contaminated or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled or without secure closures are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal, and reordered from the pharmacy, if a current order exists,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to employ a staff with the skills and abilities to effectively implement the departmental processes in accordance with standards of practice in the food services department. * The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager was competent in managing the day-to-day functions of the food services department. This failure had the potential to jeopardize the health and well-being of the 77 residents who received food prepared in the kitchen.Findings: Review of the facility's Matrix showed 77 residents consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Review of the facility's document titled Dietary Manager dated 6/25/24, the section for Position Summary showed the purpose of your job position is to organize, plan and supervise the dietary department functions in accordance with current applicable federal, state, and local standards that govern the facility and as directed by the Administrator and Dietitian. During the annual recertification survey from 9/29 to 10/1/25, 11/17, and 11/18/25, multiple issues were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 14 kitchen staff members (Cook 2) had the appropriate skill set necessary to safely perform the manual dishwashing. * The facility failed to ensure [NAME] 2 was competent to describe or demonstrate the manual dishwashing process. This failure had the potential for the residents' dishes to not be washed correctly which could lead to sanitation concerns.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled 3-Compartment Procedure for Manual Dishwashing dated 2023 showed the following:- The first compartment is for washing. Fill the first compartment with detergent per manufacturer's instructions and hot water (110 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit);- The second compartment is for rinsing. Fill the second compartment with clean, clear hot water (110 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit); and- The third compartment is for sanitizing. Fill the third compartment with Sani Tech solution (a cleaning solution) from the dispenser. Test the concentration with the appropriate test strip, which is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the menu to meet the resident's nutritional needs was followed for one of 77 residents (Resident 23). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 23 was provided with the high caloric pudding and whole milk on her lunch tray. This failure had the potential to not meet the resident's nutritional needs.Findings: Review of the facility's Matrix showed 77 residents consumed food prepared in the kitchen. On 9/29/25 at 1238 hours, during the dining observation, Resident 23's lunch meal ticket showed Resident 23 was on a controlled carbohydrate diet with pureed texture. The meal ticket indicated for Resident 23 to have a high caloric pudding and 8 fluid ounces of nectar - mildly thick whole milk. However, Resident 23's lunch tray did not contain the high caloric pudding and whole milk. An observation, interview and concurrent meal ticket review was conducted with the MDS Coordinator in the dining room. The MDS Coordinator verified Resident 23 was not provided with the high caloric pudding and whole…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food served was in accordance with the prescribed diet texture to one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 12). * The facility failed to provide Resident 12's diet was according to the physician's order. This failure posed a risk for the resident to not tolerate the food texture and choke.Findings: Medical record review of Resident 12 was initiated on 9/29/25. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included COPD and dysphagia. Review of Resident 12's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 9/15/25, for Regular Diet, Soft and Bite-Sized Level 6 texture, vegetarian, no salad entree and may give grilled cheese, allow regular bread and toast. Review of the facility's document titled 2023/2025 Diet Manual, the IDDSI (International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative) Level 6: Soft & Bite-Sized Diet showed to avoid all raw vegetables. On 9/29/25 at 1225 hours, during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was served a substitute meal entree that was equivalent to the nutritive value of the main meal entree for one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 12). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 12 received a substitute meal entree equivalent to the main meal entree of three ounce baked chicken. This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive a meal to meet the resident's needs.Findings: Medical record review of Resident 12 was initiated on 9/29/25. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 12's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 9/15/25, for Regular Diet, Soft and Bite-Sized Level 6 texture, vegetarian, no salad entree and may give grilled cheese, allow regular bread and toast. On 9/30/25 at 1227 hours, an observation of the lunch meal tray line and concurrent interview was conducted with [NAME] 1. [NAME] 1 was preparing a grilled cheese…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the adaptive equipment was used properly for one nonsampled resident (Resident 23). * The facility failed to ensure the plate guard was placed on Resident 23's plate during meals. This failure posed the risk for Resident 23 to not reach her maximum level of independence.Findings: On 9/29/25 at 1216 hours, during the dining observation, Resident 23 was observed having lunch in the dining room. Resident 23's plate guard was placed under the plate. Resident 23's meal ticket showed to have the plate guard as an adaptive equipment. Medical Record Review for Resident 23 was initiated on 9/29/25. Resident 23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 23's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 6/11/25, for the resident to have a plate guard for all meals to increase independence with self-feeding. On 9/30/25 at 1300 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure safe food handling of the food brought for the residents from the outside sources. * The facility failed to ensure the visitors who brought food for the residents from outside sources and employees who handled the outside food were educated on safe food handling. This failure poses the risk of food contamination which could lead to food borne illnesses to all 77 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Food Brought by Family and Visitors revised on 3/2022 showed the safe food handling practices are explained to family/visitors in a language and format they understand. On 9/30/25 at 0900 hours, an interview was conducted with LVN 6. LVN 6 was asked to explain the process when the visitors would bring food for the residents from the outside sources, LVN 6 stated they would check the diet order and tell the visitors the food must be labeled. When asked for how long the food brought in from the outside source could stay in the refrigerator, LVN 6 stated he was not sure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the refuse was stored in a sanitary manner. * The facility failed to ensure the two of two garbage dumpsters' lid and one of one recycling dumpster's lid were fully closed. * The facility failed to ensure the broken items/equipment were disposed of properly. These failures had the potential for pest contamination.Findings: According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Chapter 5 Water, Plumbing, and Waste, Section 5-501.113 Covering Receptacles showed outside garbage receptacles shall be kept covered with tight-fitting lids or covers. Review of the facility's P&P titled Miscellaneous Areas dated 2023 showed the garbage and trashcans must be inspected daily, no debris is on the ground or surrounding area, and that the lids are closed. The trash collection area is a potential feeding ground for vermin and rodents and must be kept clean. 1. On 9/29/25 at 1139 hours, an observation was conducted of the facility's outside recycling dumpster and two outside garbage dumpsters. The recycling dumpster was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment was complete. * The facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment addressed or included the active involvement of required individuals in developing the Facility Assessment, a plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct care staff, and a contingency plan for staffing needs. These failures had the potential to not meet the residents' care needs if the assessed population's needs and resources were not comprehensively identified and addressed.Findings: According to the CMS QSO-24-13-NH dated 6/18/24, with an implementation date of 8/8/24, CMS had issued a revised guidance for long-term care facility assessment requirement. The Facility Assessment should address and included the active involvement of the direct care staff in developing the Facility Assessment. Also included the staffing resources necessary to care for the residents, including the weekends; a plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct care staff member, and a contingency plan for staffing needs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the responsible party of one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) was informed in advance of the care that was going to be furnished and of the type of provider who would be furnishing the care to Resident 1. This failure posed the risk of Resident 1's responsible party not being able to make the informed decisions about Resident 1's care. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Informed Consent revised 3/25/24, showed the facility is to uphold the rights of the residents and their responsible party to participate in the planning and decision-making process concerning the resident's care and treatment. Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in Resident's Condition or Status revised 2/2021 showed a nurse or healthcare provider will inform the resident or responsible party of any changes to the resident's medical care or nursing treatments. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the quality care and services were provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 4's BP was monitored for hypotension. * The facility failed to ensure the results of the CBC test were promptly reported to Resident 4's physician. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 4's urine sample was collected in a timely manner. These failures had the potential for the residents to not receive the necessary care and services to maintain their highest physical well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titledProvision of Quality Care revised 12/19/22, showed based on the comprehensive assessments, the facility will ensure the residents receive the treatment and care by qualified persons in accordance with professional standards of practice, comprehensive person-centered care plans, and resident choices. The Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2 was administered Tamiflu (a medication used to treat the flu or can reduce the chance of getting the flu) as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Acute Condition Changes – Clinical Protocol revised March 2018 showed the physician will help identify individuals with a significant risk for having acute changes of condition during their stay. The nurse and physician will discuss and evaluate the situation. The physician will help identify and authorize appropriate treatments. The staff member will monitor and document the resident/ patient's progress and responses to treatment, and the physician will adjust treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement their P&P for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act when the facility failed to report an abuse allegation in a timely manner for one of two residents sampled for abuse (Resident1). * The facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported timely when Resident 1 stated the pillows were put on her face by Resident 2. This failure had the potential for the abuse allegation going unreported and uninvestigated. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigation revised 9/2022 showed all the allegations of abuse (including injuries of unknown origin, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when: * The food and beverages in the walk-in refrigerator were not discarded by the use-by date. * The appropriate hair restraints were not worn by four staff in the kitchen (The DSS, Cooks 1 and 2, and the Maintenance Supervisor). * One uncovered bucket of cleaning chemical was stored next to two containers of broth base and one container of oil. * The cooking utensils, cutting boards did not have cleanable surfaces. * One rubber spatula had white residue on the spatula and handle. * 12 baking sheets had black residue. * The trash can lid was on top of the handwashing sink * One dry goods bin with white granulated powder was unlabeled. * Two dry goods scoops, with powdery white residue, were on the food preperation counter * Two oven mitts were discolored and had frayed edges. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses for the residents receiving kitchen services. Findings: Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of six final sampled residents (Resident 7) reviewed for psychotropic use was informed of the indication for the use of psychotropic medications (medication affecting brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 7's informed consent was obtained when the indication for the use of risperidone (an antipsychotic medication used for mental illness that causes disturbed or unusual thinking) was changed to racing thought. This failure had the potential for Resident 7 to not be informed of the medication and potential effects of risperidone. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic Medication Use dated 7/2023 showed the residents, families, and/or representatives are involved in the medication management process. Residents (and/or representatives) have the right to decline treatment with psychotropic medications. Medical record review for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to assess one of 21 final sampled residents (Resident 74) for their self-administration of the medications. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' physiological well-being and could administer the medications inaccurately. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Administration of Medications revised February 2021 showed the residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. The IDT assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. Further review of the policy showed resident who are identified as being able to self-administer the medication are asked whether they wish to do so. The policy also showed any medications found at the bedside that are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the reasonable accommodations to meet the care needs for two of 21 final sampled residents (Residents 4 and 72). * The facility failed to ensure Residents 4 and 72's call lights were kept within the residents' reach. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' psychosocial well-being or result in a delay to provide care and services to the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Answering the Call Light revised 9/2022, showed the purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs. Ensure that the call light is accessible to the resident when in bed, from the toilet, from the shower or bathing facility and from the floor. 1. Medical Record review for Resident 4 was initiated on 9/19/24. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 4's MDS Quarterly assessment dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to address and follow through with the concerns brought up in the resident council meetings (a group of residents gathered to discuss interests and issues noted in facility). * The facility failed to complete the request for the OCTA Access forms for the residents. * The facility failed to thoroughly address regarding the concerns about the CNAs' mannerisms when answering the residents. These failures had the potential for the residents' identified issues to go uncorrected. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Council revised 2/2021 showed the facility supports the residents' rights to organize and participate in the resident council. A Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. The facility department related to any issues will be responsible for addressing the item(s) of concern. 1. Review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes showed the resident council…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 6. Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 9/17/24. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's Physician's Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) dated 7/28/24, showed Resident 2 did not have an advance directive. Review of Resident 2's Advanced Healthcare Directive Acknowledgement Form, undated, showed Resident 2 did not have an advance healthcare directive; however, there was no documentation to show the resident or the resident's representative was offered information regarding the formulation of an advance directive. On 9/20/24 at 1327 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review for Resident 2 was conducted with the SSD. The SSD verified the Advance Healthcare Directive Acknowledgement form for Resident 2 was incomplete and stated it should have been completed. The SSD verified the form did not show Resident 2 or the resident representative was offered information regarding the formulation of an advance directive. 7.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' medical records were safeguarded to protect their confidential health information for two nonsampled residents (Residents 56 and 59). This failure had the potential for the residents' personal and health information to be accessed from the unauthorized users. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy revised 10/2017 showed the facility will safeguard the personal privacy and confidentiality of all resident personal and medical records. Access to the resident personal and medical records will be limited to authorized staff and business associates. On 9/17/24 at 1642 hours, Nursing Station A was observed with three computer monitors turned on. One computer monitor showed the physician's orders for Resident 59. Another computer monitor showed the care tracker/dashboard for Resident 56. Both computer monitors showing residents' information were left unattended. On 9/17/24 at 1644 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representatives of the resident's transfer and reasons for the transfer to the acute care hospital in writing for one of three final sampled resident (Resident 2) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure posed the risk of the resident's representatives not being aware of their appeal rights. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Transfer or Discharge, Facility Initiated dated 10/2022 showed facility-initiated transfers and discharges, when necessary, must meet specific criteria and require resident/ representative notification and orientation, and documentation as specified in this policy. Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 9/20/24. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's H&P examination dated 1/5/24, showed Resident 2 had no capacity to understand and make decisions. Review of Resident 2's Orders Summary Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change MDS within 14 days after a significant change for one of two final sampled residents reviewed for hospice services (Resident 2). This failure resulted in a delay in a comprehensive reassessment of the resident's changing health status and plan of care, in the effort to attain the resident's highest level of well-being. Findings: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual dated October 2023, showed a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) must be completed within 14 days when a resident enrolls in a hospice program. Medical record review for Resident 2 was initiated on 9/17/24. Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report for active orders as of 7/29/24, showed a physician's order dated 7/29/24, for Resident 2 to be admitted to hospice services. Review of Resident 2's MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the plan of care was developed for three of 21 final sampled residents (Residents 13, 43, and 72). * The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident 13's fall incident on 7/27/24, and Resident 13's significant weight loss. * The facility failed to develop a plan of care to address the actual fall for Resident 43. * The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident 72's fall on 5/29/24. These failures had the potential risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to these residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised March 2022 showed the comprehensive, person-centered care plan describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being including services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide services to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of 21 final sampled residents (Resident 7). * The facility failed to follow the physician's order for Resident 7 for cervical collar at all times every shift. This failure posed the risk of adverse effects to Residents 7's well-being. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 7 was initiated on 09/18/24. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the MDS comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident's BIMS score of 12. Review of Resident 7's H&P examination dated 9/16/24, showed the resident had the capacity. The H&P examination also showed diagnoses including cervical fracture. Review of the Order Summary Report dated 9/18/24, showed a physician's order dated 6/15/24, for cervical collar at all times every shift. Review of Resident 7's Plan of Care showed a care plan problem initiated on 6/16/24, for Immobilizer- At…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's low air loss mattress was set appropriately according to the resident's weight for one of two final sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcer (Resident 13). This failure had the potential for Residents 13 not receiving the appropriate care and services to prevent the development of the pressure ulcers. Findings: On 9/18/24 at 0956 hours,and 9/19/24 at 1355 hours, Resident 13 was observed lying in bed on low air loss mattress. The low air loss mattress was observed being set to 250 pounds. Medical record review for Resident 13 was initiated on 9/18/24. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 13's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 12/7/23, for a low air loss mattress and to monitor the low air loss mattress for setting every shift. Review of Resident 13's Braden Scale For Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 8/21/24, showed Resident 13 was at a high risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of 21 final sampled residents (Residents 2 and 86) received the necessary care and services to prevent accident hazards. * The facility failed to thoroughly investigate and document Resident 2's cause of skin tear on the right buttock. * The facility failed to ensure the physician's order for Resident 86 to wear WanderGuard at all times was followed. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting revised 7/2017 showed all accidents or incidents involving residents, employees, visitors, vendors, etc., occurring on our premises shall be investigated and reported to the Administrator. The nurse supervisor/charge nurse and/or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the accident or incident. Medical record review for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure three of six final sampled residents reviewed for weight loss (Residents 4, 13, and 35) received the appropriate services needed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status. * The facility failed to implement interventions to maintain Resident 13's nutritional status when the resident experienced severe weight loss. The facility failed to notify Resident 13's physician and responsible party in timely manner and failed to ensure the IDT analyzed and implemented the necessary interventions to address Resident 13's severe weight loss. * Residents 4 and 35's weekly weights were not completed as ordered by the physicians. These failures had the potential to result in the lack of implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of the effectiveness of nutritional interventions and related outcomes and increase the potential for further weight loss and/or nutritional decline. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care for five of six final sampled resident (Residents 2, 4, 27, 72, and 442) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 12) reviewed for respiratory care and services. * The facility failed to ensure the physician's order for oxygen therapy was followed for Resident 442. In addition, the facility failed to clarify the physician's order when the order did not show how high the oxygen could be titrated for Resident 442. * Resident 12's oxygen concentrator was observed in the hallway, and the door was closed with compressing oxygen tubing. This failure posed the risk of Resident 12 not receiving her oxygen. * Resident 27 was not administered continuous oxygen as ordered by the physician. *The facility failed to ensure Resident 72's oxygen titration order included the parameter for the oxygen to be titrate up to. * The facility failed to ensure there was a physician's order for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three final sampled residents (Resident 62) reviewed for pain management had the pain medication orders to include clear indication for use as evidenced by: * Resident 62 had the orders for acetaminophen (analgesic) and hydrocodone-acetaminophen (opioid analgesic) with the same pain levels for use. This failure posed the risk of the resident's pain not being managed appropriately. Findings: Medical record review was initiated for Resident 62 on 9/17/24. Resident 62 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 62's admission MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 62 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 62's MAR for September 2024 showed an order dated 7/22/24, for acetaminophen for pain levels mild to severe (levels of 1-10, on a 0-10 pain scale, with 0=no pain and 10=worst pain) and order dated 6/15/24, for hydrocodone-acetaminophen for moderate to severe pain (levels of 4-10). On 9/20/24 at 1408 hours, concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medications were administered according to the facility's P&P for one nonsampled resident (Resident 59). This failure posed the risk of Resident 59's medications not being administered according to accepted practices. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications through an Enteral Tube revised 11/18 showed steps to administer G-tube medications included removing the plunger from the syringe prior to pouring the medications into the syringe barrel. Further steps include to flush the G-tube with water prior to administering medications and also in between administering medications. On 9/19/24 at 0820 hours, a concurrent medication administration observation for Resident 59 and interview was conducted with LVN 3. LVN 3 was observed using the syringe and plunger to push the first medication, then second medication into Resident 59's G-tube. LVN 3 failed to flush Resident 59's G-tube with 50 ml of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of five final sampled residents (Residents 2 and 7) reviewed for psychotropic medications (medication affecting brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 7's behavior manifestation and side effects were monitored accurately for the use of risperidone (an antipsychotic medication used for mental illness that causes disturbed or unusual thinking). * The facility failed to ensure the PRN order for lorazepam (antianxiety medication)was limited to 14 days for Resident 2. These failures posed the risk of unnecessary medications for these residents and negatively affects the residents' health and well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic Medication Use dated 7/2022 showed the drugs in the categories considered psychotropic medications are subject to prescribing, monitoring, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure daily nutritional and special dietary needs, and preferences were provided for one of 21 final sampled residents (Resident 62) and two nonsampled residents (Residents 592 and 593). * Resident 592's lunch tray did not include gluten free pasta. * Resident 593's lunch tray did not include double portions. * Resident 62 did not have Ensure (supplement) to his lunch tray as per the physician's orders. These failures posed the risk for the residents' foods and nutritional needs not being met. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's posted menu showed the lunch menu for 9/18/24, included chicken cacciatore with pasta, and broccoli and cauliflower with Italian green bean salad and cranberry crunch. a. Medical record review for Resident 592 was initiated on 9/18/24. Resident 592 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 592's Order Summary Report dated 9/18/24, showed a physician's order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and the facility document review, the facility failed to ensure one of three nonsampled residents (Resident 45) reviewed for arbitration, who had no mental capacity to understand the terms of the facility's binding arbitration agreement (an agreement that allows parties to resolve disputes and lawsuits privately rather than going to the court) did not sign the Arbitration Agreement. This failure posed the risk for the resident to not have a clear understanding of the arbitration process. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 45 was initiated on 9/20/24. Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 45's MDS - Section C dated 6/6/24, showed the resident's BIMS score was 6 which meant he had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Arbitration Agreement showed a notice: by signing this contract you are agreeing to have any issue of medical malpractice decided by neutral arbitration and you are giving up your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-20 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for two of two final sampled residents reviewed for hospice services (Residents 2 and 13). * The facility failed to ensure the hospice was notified regarding significant weight loss for Residents 2 and 13. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2 received the hospice nursing visits two times per week as per the plan of care. These failures posed the risk for delays in the communication between the hospice provider and the facility which may affect resident care. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Weight Assessment and Intervention dated May 2023 showed the resident weights are monitored for undesirable or unintended weight loss or gain. The P&P showed the suggested parameters: a). 1 months- 5% weight loss is significant, greater than 5% is severe; b). 3 month- 7.5% weight loss is significant; greater than 7.5% is severe; and, c). 6 months- 10% weight loss is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to ensure the equipment was maintained in the safe operating condition when: * The facility's freezer compartments had ice buildup for two of two medication refrigerators. * One of one ice machines had black tape, a non-cleanable surface, and brownish-red residue inside. These failures had the potential to affect the resident's health and well-being. Findings: 1. On 9/18/24 at 1025 hours, a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with RN 1. Station 2 medication refrigerator inspection showed ice buildup. RN 1 verified the freezer compartment for the medication refrigerator in Station 2 had ice buildup. On 9/18/24 at 1110 hours, a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with RN 2. Station 1 medication refrigerator inspection showed ice buildup. RN 2 verified the freezer compartment for the medication refrigerator in Station 1 had ice buildup. 2. On 9/20/24 at 0827 hours, a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the Maintenance Supervisor and Corporate Dietary Supervisor. During an inspection of the ice machine, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of pests in one resident's room, and the kitchen. * A fly was observed in Resident 10's room and on their uncovered cup of milk and on the opening of their bedside insulated water mug. * A fly was observed in the kitchen on multiple occasions over two days, by the coffee machine, puree food preparation and tray line areas. These failures had the potential for transmission of foodborne illness to the residents. Findings: 1. On 9/17/24 at 1504 hours, during a kitchen observation, a fly was observed flying around by the coffee makers, then the stove area. On 9/18/24 at 1003 hours, during the puree food preparation observation, a fly was observed flying around the kitchen by the preparation and tray line area. On 9/18/24 at 1157 hours, a tray line observation in the kitchen was conducted. During the facility's lunch tray line, a fly was observed on a covered loaf of bread. The Corporate Dietary Supervisor verified the observation of fly. 2. On 9/17/24 at 1245 hours, Resident 10 was observed lying in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the medications were administered as ordered for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1). * Resident 1's evening medications were not administered on the admission day because they were not delivered by the pharmacy. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised 4/2019 showed the medications are to be administered in accordance with the prescriber's orders and within the required time frame. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 3/18/24. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's H&P examination dated 3/11/24, showed Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make medical decisions. Resident 1 had active medical problems, including hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and an infection in the bone of his right big toe.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the RD and IDT evaluations and interventions related to weight loss were conducted timely for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for a delay in providing care and interventions and continued weight loss for the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Weight Assessment and Intervention revised March 2022 showed any weight change of 5% or more since last weight assessment is retaken the next day for conformation, if the weight is verified, nursing will immediately notify the dietitian in writing, and the suggested parameters for evaluating significant of unplanned or undesired weight loss/gain will be based on the following criteria: a. 1 (one) month - 5% weight loss is significant; greater than 5% is severe. b. 3 (three) months - 7.5 % weight loss is significant; greater than 7.5% is severe. c. 6 (six) months - 10% weight loss is significant; greater than 10% is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) did not receive the unnecessary medication when the licensed nurse failed to enter or implement the physician's order correctly. This failure had the potential for the resident to experience adverse effects and negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 2/13/24. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's MAR for December 2023 showed Resident 1 received the following medications: - ethambutol HCl 100 mg 10 tablets by mouth one time a day every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 0900 hours for MAC infection on 12/15, 12/18, 12/20, 12/22, 12/25, 12/27, and 12/29/23. - ethambutol HCl 400 mg 2.5 tablets by mouth in the evening for MAC infection with dinner at 1800 hours on 12/23, /12/24, 12/25, 12/26, 12/27, 12/28, and 12/29/23. Review of Resident 1's MAR for January 2024 showed Resident 1 received the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Intakes: CA00882864 Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's meals were served at the desired temperatures for two of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2). This failure had the potential for the undesirable food temperatures to result in decreased oral meal intake and undesirable weight loss for the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Resident Council Minutes dated 10/19/23, showed the residents complained of the temperatures of the hot food were not hot. On 2/13/24 at 0857 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated the hot food on their meal trays were often cold, and Resident 1 often needed to ask the staff to reheat her food. On 2/13/24 at 0930 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 2. Resident 2 stated the hot food items on their meal tray were not hot enough, and sometimes lukewarm at best. On 2/14/24 at 0945 hours, an interview was conducted with the DSS. The DSS stated the facility was aware of the residents' complaint of food not being hot enough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure five of six meal tray carts used for meal distribution to the residents were maintained in the proper functioning order. This failure had the potential for undesirable food temperatures and unsafe food temperatures. Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Resident Council Minutes dated 10/19/23, showed the residents complained of temperature of hot food was not hot. On 2/13/24 at 0857 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated the hot food on their meal trays were often cold, and Resident 1 often needed to ask the staff to reheat her food. On 2/13/24 at 0930 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 2. Resident 2 stated the hot food items on their meal tray were not hot enough, and sometimes lukewarm at best. On 2/14/24 at 0945 hours, an interview was conducted with the DSS. The DSS stated the facility have seven meal tray carts used to store and deliver the meal trays to the residents. The DSS stated one meal tray cart was currently out of use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from sexual abuse. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for psychological and emotional harm. * On 12/15/23, Resident 2 was observed with his hands down on Resident 1's pants and making a jerking motion. Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment and did not have the capacity to consent. Resident 1 was not consistently monitored for 72 hours after the incident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation Prevention Program revised 4/2021 showed the residents have the rights to be free from abuse. Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse and Neglect – Clinical Protocol revised 3/2018 showed sexual abuse is defined as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. The P&P also showed the staff and physician will monitor the individuals who have been abused to address any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) to maintain their highest physical well-being. Resident 1 was admitted from the acute care hospital with status post bilateral foot surgery. * The facility failed to provide the wound treatment to Resident 1's bilateral feet and failed to apply the wound VAC to his right first toe amputation on 8/5/23. * The facility failed to obtain Resident 1's laboratory blood test on 8/7/23, as per the physician's order. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health and well-being. Findings: Medical record review was initiated for Resident 1 on 8/16/23. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], from the acute care hospital. Review of Resident 1's History and Physical examination dated 8/1/23, showed Resident 1 was admitted to theacute care hospital with bilateral foot wounds, sepsis, and acute kidney injury. Resident 1 underwent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document and P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the CDM was competent to manage the day to day operations of the food service department as evidenced by: 1. The CDM failed to provide food in a manner that was in accordance with current food safety guidelines. 2. The CDM failed to ensure recipes were followed and correct portion sizes were served. 3. The CDM failed to ensure therapeutic diets were followed. 4. The CDM failed to ensure foods were prepared to conserve nutritive value. 5. The CDM failed to ensure mechanically altered diets were served food consistent with the prescribed texture. 6. The CDM failed to follow and document the residents' food preferences. These failures posed the risk of food borne illness for all residents who received food from the kitchen, resident's nutritional needs to not be met, aspiration risk for those residents on a mechanically altered diet, and residents' food preferences not honored. Findings: Review of the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) form 672 titled Census and Conditions of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed. * The facility failed to ensure the recipes were followed. * The facility failed to ensure the therapeutic diets were followed. * The facility failed to ensure the correct portion sizes were followed. These failures had the potential for resident's nutritional needs not to be met which could further compromise their medical status. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility dated 12/6/21, showed 77 of 80 residents in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Menus dated 10/2017 showed menus meet the nutritional needs of the residents in accordance with the recommended dietary allowances of the Food and Nutrition Board. a. Review of the facility's recipe titled Peanut Butter Pie showed the following ingredients for the filling: cream cheese, powdered sugar, skim milk, peanut butter, vanilla extract, and cream half & half, whipped. On 12/7/21 at 0900 hours, an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the expired foods were discarded. * The facility failed to ensure proper thawing of frozen food in the refrigerator. * The facility failed to ensure a cooling log was in place. * The facility failed to ensure proper covering, labeling, and dating of foods in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the proper storage of produce. * The facility failed to ensure the proper use of the sanitizing solution in the sanitizing sink. * The facility failed to ensure proper backflow prevention of two of three air gaps. * The facility failed to ensure proper sanitary condition of the hood over the stove. * The facility failed to ensure proper sanitary condition of the drain sink under the tray line table. * The facility failed to ensure replacement of missing kitchen floor tile and grout. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to safeguard one of the 18 final sampled residents (Resident 74)'s personal belonging from loss or theft. * Resident 74's irreplaceable personal pictures were lost when he was moved to another room in the facility. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 74 was initiated on [DATE]. Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 0813 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 74. Resident 74 stated he used to have a bulletin board by his bedside with the pictures of his family and friends posted on it. Resident 74 stated one of the pictures was of his wife who had died. Resident 74 stated all of his pictures which were precious to him got lost when he was transferred to another room. Resident 74 stated he had told the facility staff about it but no one could find them. During an interview with the SSD on [DATE] at 1314 hours, the SSD stated she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop and implement the comprehensive person-centered care plans for three of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 29, 74, and 425). * The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 425's smoking. * The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 29's use of antidepressant medication. * The facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident 74's religious food preferences. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the care needed for the residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered revised on 12/2016 showed it is the policy of the facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards for one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 425). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 425 was assessed for safe smoking. This failure posed the risk of fire and injury to the residents and staff in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Smoking Policy - Residents revised 7/2017 showed the residents will be informed of the facility smoking policy and evaluated on admission to determine if the resident is a smoker or non-smoker. If the resident is a smoker, they will be evaluated the ability to smoke safely with or without supervision. The residents without independent smoking privileges may not keep any smoking materials except when they are under direct supervision of staff. Medical record review for Resident 425 was initiated on 12/7/21. Resident 425 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Order Summary Report showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident when: * The facility failed to ensure Resident 6's lorazepam (anti-anxiety medication) was accurately reconciled. Five tablets for lorazepam had been removed from Resident 6's medication bubble pack after it had been discontinued on 11/24/21. The number of tablets of lorazepam removed showing on the Antibiotic or Controlled Drug Record did not match the number of tablets in the electronic MAR as administered to Resident 6. This failure had the possibility of diversion of controlled medications. * The facility failed to ensure the oral medications emergency kit was replaced in a timely manner. In addition, the coumadin tablet removed from the emergency kit was not documented in the emergency kit medication log. These failures had the potential for to contribute to a decreased availability of medications in an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the safe medication storage was observed in three of seven medication carts (Medication Cart 4, Treatment Cart 2, and IV Cart 1). * An expired bottle of vitamin E was stored in Medication Cart 4. * An expired acetic acid solution was stored in Treatment Cart 2. * Two bags of expired IV fluids were stored in IV Cart 1. These failures had the potential for the residents to be exposed to the expired medications. Findings: According to the facility's P&P titled Storage of Medications, discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. 1. On 12/08/21 at 1420 hours, during the inspection of Medication Cart 4 with LVN 5, a bottle of vitamin E with an expiration date of 9/21/21, was observed in the first drawer. LVN 5 verified the findings and stated the expired bottle of vitamin E should have been disposed. 2. On 12/08/21 at 1534 hours, during the inspection of Treatment Cart 2 with LVN 2, an opened bottle of 0.25% Acetic acid irrigation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure the nutritive value of minced/moist and pureed vegetables were conserved when minced/moist and pureed vegetables were prepared with additional liquid and held in a hot oven for more than an hour and a half prior to meal service. This failure placed four residents who received a minced/moist diet and seven residents who received a puree diet at risk for compromised nutritional status. Findings: The nutritional value of food, in particular vegetables, which are heated multiple times compromises both the palatability and nutritional value of food (Nutrition.gov). Review of the facility's recipe titled Capri Blend Veg undated showed for minced/moist diets, to mince regular portions, making sure all particles are no more than 4 millimeters x 4 millimeters (1/8 inch) long with no separate thin liquid prior to service. For puree diets, the recipe showed to place prepared servings into a blender or processor. Process until fine. For every five portions needed, add ¼ cup thickener, process until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident 18) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 58) received food prepared in a form to meet their individual dietary needs. This failure placed Resident 18 and Resident 58 at risk for aspiration (accidental breathing in of food or fluid into the lungs). Findings: Review of the facility document titled Week 3 Monday Cycle 4 2021 showed mechanical soft diets should have received a finely chopped salad. 1. During the lunch meal service observation on 12/6/21 at 1238 hours, Resident 58 was in the dining room for the lunch meal. Review of Resident 58's lunch meal ticket showed the diet was a regular diet with mechanical soft consistency. Resident 58's lunch meal consisted of ground meat, pasta, garlic bread and a regular tossed salad. When asked, LVN 2 verified Resident 58's salad should be finely chopped and removed the salad from the meal tray. 2. On 12/6/21 at 1330 hours, a lunch meal service observation was conducted with sampled Resident 18. Review of Resident 18's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility document review, the facility failed to honor religious food preferences for one sampled resident (Resident 74). This failure posed the risk of Resident 74's religious and nutritional needs not to be met. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Resident Food Preferences dated July 2017 showed individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team. The Food Services Department will offer a variety of foods at each scheduled meal, as well as access to nourishing snacks throughout the day and night. Medical record review for Resident 74 was initiated on 12/6/21. Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility document titled Week 3, Cycle 4 2021, Therapeutic Spreadsheets did not include a Vegetarian diet. Review of the Physician's orders dated 12/8/21, showed Resident 74's diet was a regular diet, pureed/level 4 texture, Nectar Mildly thick consistency. Review of the Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure the policy regarding food brought to the facility for the residents by the family or visitors was followed. This failure posed the risk for potential unsafe food handling practices. Findings: According to the facility's P&P titled Food Brought by Family/Visitors dated October 2017 showed all personnel involved in preparing, handling, serving or assisting the resident with meals or snacks will be trained in safe food handling practices. On 12/7/21 at 1447 hours, an interview was conducted with the LVN 2. LVN 2 was familiar with the facility procedure for food brought to the facility for the residents by the family or visitors. However, LVN 2 stated she could not remember if she had received any safe food handling training. On 12/7/21 at 1459 hours, an interview was conducted with the CNA 2. CNA 2 stated she had not received training on safe food handling practices regarding food brought to the facility for the residents by the family or visitors. 12/7/21 at 1501 hours, an interview was conducted with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 7) was complete. * Resident 7's POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment is a medical order that helps give people control over their care during a medical emergency) form was blank, but was signed and dated by the physician. This had the potential for the resident's emergency care needs not being met because his medical information was incomplete. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 7 was initiated on 12/6/2021. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the H&P examination dated 8/26/21, showed Resident 7 was able to make his own medical decisions. Review of Resident 7's POLST dated 8/15/21, showed it was signed and dated by the physician, but the information was not filled in. On 12/6/21 at 1246 hours, RN 1 confirmed the POLST was missing the resident's wishes regarding his medical treatment in the case of an emergency. RN 1 stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to follow the infection control practices for three of 18 final sampled residents (Residents 52, 56, and 578): * LVN 4 failed to perform hand hygiene during the medication administration for Resident 56. * Resident 52's indwelling urinary catheter drainage tubing was observed dragging on the ground under the wheelchair. * Resident 578's wheelchair was dirty and had brown stains on the seat. These failures had the potential to cause growth and the spread of microorganisms. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene revised August 2019 showed all personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situation - after contact with resident's intact skin, after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 18 final sampled residents (Resident 7) was offered the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine. This failure had the potential for the resident not being fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 7 was initiated on 12/9/21. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 12/09/21 at 1355 hours, concurrent interview and medical record review was conducted with the facility's IP. Resident 7's Immunization Record showed Resident 7 received one dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine on 8/14/21. When asked about Resident 7's second dose of the vaccine, the IP verified there was no documentation to show Resident 7 was offered the second dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for one of 23 final sampled residents (Resident 5). * Resident 5's medical record had conflicting documented information as to whether Resident 5 had formulated an advance directive for health care. This failure had the potential for not meeting Resident 5's requests specific to his healthcare.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 5 was initiated on 11/17/25. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 5's Advanced Healthcare Directive Acknowledgement Form dated 9/8/25, showed Resident 5 had not formulated an advanced directive. Review of Resident 5's POLST dated 9/8/25, showed Resident 5's advance directive was not available. On 11/17/25 at 1449 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review was conducted with the SSD. The SSD verified Resident 5's Advanced Healthcare Directive Acknowledgement Form dated 9/8/25, showed Resident 5 had not formulated an advanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive plan of care to reflect the individual care needs for one of six sampled residents (Resident 4). * The facility failed to develop a care plan when Resident 4 had an episode of dislodged nephrostomy tube. This failure had the potential for the residents to not receive the appropriate, consistent, and individualized care. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised 3/2022 showed a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Medical record review for Resident 4 was initiated on 9/3/25. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 4's MDS assessment dated [DATE], showed the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-01-16 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the quarterly trust fund statements to one of two residents reviewed for personal funds (Resident 5). This failure had the potential for loss and misuse of Resident 5's personal funds. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Management of Residents' Personal Funds revised 3/2021 showed should the facility be appointed the resident's representative payee, and directly receive monthly benefits to which the resident is entitled, such funds are managed in accordance with established policies and federal/state requirements. On 1/2/25 at 0833 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 5. Resident 5 stated she did not remember receiving her quarterly trust fund statement from the BOM. Resident 5 stated she had not received any statements from the facility or the BOM in years. Resident 5 further stated she probably received her statement when she got admitted in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-20 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS assessment was accurate for two of 21 final sampled residents (Residents 2 and 71). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 71's gender was coded accurately. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 2's hospice services and weight loss was coded accurately. These failures placed the residents at risk for lack of continuity of care. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 71 was initiated on 9/20/24. Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 71's H&P examination dated 7/12/24, showed Resident 71 was male. Review of Resident 71's MDS dated 1/25, 2/1 and 2/13/24, showed Resident 71's gender was coded female. On 9/20/24 at 1039 hours, a concurrent interview and medical record review for Resident 71 was conducted with the MDS coordinator. The MDS coordinator verified above findings and stated Resident 71 was a male and the MDS for Resident 71's gender was not coded accurately on 1/25, 2/1 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to dispose and store trash in a sanitary manner. This failure posed a threat for pest contamination. Findings: According to the US Food Code 2013, 5-501.113, Covering Receptacles, receptacle units for refuse shall be kept covered with tight fitting lids after they are filled. On 9/20/24 at 0827 hours, an observation of the facility's trash dumpsters and recycling bin was conducted with the Maintenance Supervisor. The following was observed: - One of one recycling bin was observed with flattened cardboard boxes piled above the rim of the bin, preventing the lids from closing properly. - Two of two trash dumpsters were observed with black trash bags preventing the lids from closing properly. The Maintenance Supervisor stated the trash and recycle bin lids should be closed fully, and not propped up, to prevent pests from getting into the bins.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-07-22 · tag F0573 — pattern
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the requested medical and billing records for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to violate the resident's rights. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Release of Information revised 11/2009showed all information contained in the resident's medical record is confidential and may only be released by the written consent of the resident or his/her legal representative, consistent with state laws and regulations. The resident may initiate a request to release such information contained in his/her records and charts to anyone he/she wishes. Such requests will be honored only upon the receipt of a written, signed, and dated request from the resident or representative. A resident may have access to his or her records within 48 hours of the resident's written or oral request. Closed medical record for Resident 1 was initiated on 7/22/24. Resident 1 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-07-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment was provided for the residents. * The facility failed to ensure the broken shower bench in Shower Room C was removed. This failure had the potential to affect the safety of the residents in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Maintenance Service revised December 2009 showed the maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment. The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining the buildings, grounds, and equipment in a safe and operable manner at all times. On 7/1/24 at 0949 hours, an observation was conducted in Shower Room C. A broken shower bench was found in the shower room. The chair had a hanging metal at one end and the legs of the shower bench were not even. On 7/1/24 at 1007 hours, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 observed, touched, and moved the shower bench in Shower Room C. CNA 1 verified the shower bench in Shower Room C was broken. CNA 1 stated it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CBH OPS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 06/30/2023
MELLITI, RUSHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER25%since 06/30/2023
PEASE, NATHANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER25%since 06/30/2023
FRANKEL, MOISHEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER25%since 06/30/2023
LEVY, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER25%since 06/30/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$367K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 62%Medicare 17%Other / private 21%

This home reported $367K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$395per resident / day
operating cost
$12,016per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$409per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055585. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next