The Reutlinger Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 298 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 178 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 45.5 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.14 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.30 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-01 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one of four sampled Residents (Resident 1) adequate notice of Medicare Non-Coverage. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's right to an appeal process.During record review of Resident 1's admission record, printed on 5/21/26, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE].During record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care), dated 4/14/26, indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used to assess mental status) score was 15 out of 15, which indicated Resident 1's cognition was intact. During record review of Resident 1's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC), dated 4/11/2026, Resident 1's name was incorrectly spelled and indicated, Medicare Coverage of your current skilled nursing services will end on 4/13/2026. The NOMNC indicated Refused to sign on the 'signature of patient or representative' line and under that line was a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled Residents (Resident 1) had complete and accurate documentation recorded in the electronic health record regarding the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) document. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's right to an appeal process. During record review of Resident 1's admission record, printed on 5/21/26, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE].During record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care) dated 4/14/26, indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used to assess mental status) score was 15 out of 15, and indicated Resident 1's cognition was intact.During record review of Resident 1's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) dated 4/11/2026, Resident 1's name was incorrectly spelled and indicated Medicare Coverage of your current skilled nursing services will end on 4/13/2026. The record indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1) in a timely manner when Resident 1's left middle fingernail came off on 3/6/26, and no staff knew what had caused it. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk of continued injury, as the lack of timely reporting could delay the investigation and the implementation of necessary protective measures. A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (FS, a summary document in a resident's medical record that contains key identifying and administrative information), printed on 4/2/26, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN), subtitled admission History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/26/26, indicated Resident 1 to have diagnoses of Stroke (blood flow to part of the brain stops and causes problems with movement, speaking, or thinking) with left side hemiplegia (paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on one side of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident 1 to assess and maintain psychosocial well-being.This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident's safety, psychosocial well-being and quality of life. During a record review of admission record, printed on 1/13/26, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE].During a record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment used to guide care), dated 9/23/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment used to assess mental status) score was 3 out of 15, which indicated Resident 1's cognition was severely impaired.During an interview on 1/13/26, at 1:02 p.m., Director of Nursing (DON) stated there was no care plan initiated after verbal abuse was observed by Resident 1's Family Representative (FR) 1 on 10/04/2025. DON stated because abuse was not committed by staff or another Resident, a care plan was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the Facility Assessment Tool (a document with facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during day-to-day operations), prior to accepting one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) at the facility. Facility did not ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was available to care for Resident 1, who required continuous Antibiotic Intravenous Therapy (IV ATB- administration of antibiotic medications directly into the bloodstream through a vein to treat infection) for a period of three weeks. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to experience discomfort, frustration; an unplanned, and an avoidable discharge back to the hospital after three (3) days of being at the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (a document with resident ' s basic personal information) printed on 2/12/25, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-11-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete annual performance review and maintain competency/skills records for 17 of 17 sampled Licensed Nurses (LN's). A licensed nurse is a healthcare professional who has met requirements by state board of nursing to practice nursing skills within defined scope. This failure placed residents residing at the facility at risk to receive care from incompetent LN's. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review with Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 11/20/24, at 12:17 p.m., an untitled, undated facility's document with facility's active employee names, date of hire, job title, employee ID was reviewed. The document indicated facility had 17 LN's including: nine (9) active Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) and eight (8) active Registered Nurses (RNs). The DSD then provided a binder containing wound competency checklist completed for all LNs on 7/11/24. The DSD stated she was able to locate LN's competency checks completed for skin and wound care only. During a review of facility's undated document titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Drug Regimen Reviews (DRR- review of all medications the residents were using in order to optimize therapy, identify any potential drug reactions, ineffective drug therapy or duplicate drug therapy) by the Consultant Pharmacist (CP, a pharmacist with specialized training to review safety aspects of medication use) were acted upon on a monthly basis for two of four sampled residents (Residents 4 and Resident 34). This failure had the potential to result in not addressing medication safety irregularities in a timely manner and/or help optimize the drug therapy for Resident 4 and Resident 34. Findings: During a review of the facility's document titled, Drug Regimen Review (DRR) binder, the DRR binder did not include the CP's monthly recommendations for June through October 2024. During an interview on 11/21/24, at 8:09 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated she did not have the DRR for the months of June through October 2024 because she did not receive them from the CP. During a phone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store drugs for one out of 12 sampled Residents (Resident 18). These failures had the potential for Resident 18 to take expired, less effective and discontinued medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's admission Record, printed 11/20/24, indicated, Resident 18 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with multiple diagnosis which included, Pneumonitis (swelling and irritation of lung tissue) due to inhalation of food and vomit, and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (a long-term disease in which the body cannot regulate the amount of sugar in the blood) with diabetic chronic kidney disease (when diabetes damages the kidneys, causing them to filter waste less effectively). During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/19/24, at 12:23 p.m., with Registered Nurse (RN) 2, Medication Cart A was observed. The medication cart had Residents 18's Lantus (a long-acting insulin that helps control blood sugar levels in people with diabetes 100 unit/ml (milliliter) inject 25 units Sub-Q (subcutaneous -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — pattern
  Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to intervene for one of the sampled residents (Resident 34), when his dentures were not fitting properly for over a month. This failure resulted in Resident 34 feeling frustrated, awful, and placed him at risk for unintended weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record (a document used to communicate basic information about a resident) printed on 11/20/24, the record indicated Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. A review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment used to plan care), dated 11/8/24, indicated, Resident 34 was able to understand others and was able to make himself understood. During a review of Resident 34's Order summary report, dated 3/30/24, the order indicated to perform dental exam and treatment as indicated. A review of Resident 34's Nutrition/Hydration care plan, revised on 11/8/24, indicated Resident 34 was at high risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the therapeutic diet ordered by the physician were followed for two of four sampled residents (Resident 7 and Resident 35) during a dining observation when: 1. Resident 35, who was on mechanical soft diet (a texture-modified diet that consists of foods that are easy to chew and swallow) with ground meats received a piece of meat, not in bite size as indicated on the meal ticket. 2. Resident 7, who was on a mechanical soft diet received a regular texture of snap peas vegetable. This failure had the potential for Resident 7 and Resident 35 to choke and/or aspirate (inhalation of a foreign object into the airway or lungs). Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 35's admission Record (AR) (a document used to communicate basic information about a resident), dated 11/18/24, AR indicated Resident 35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a concurrent observation and interview in Resident 35's room on 11/18/24, at 12:07 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $459K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA