Delano District Skilled Nursing Facility
1509 Tokay Street, Delano, CA 93215 · Non profit - Corporation · 141 certified beds · (661) 720-2100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $17,966 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-29)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.7% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.2% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.06 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.48 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
31.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 106 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 31.1%CMS range 22.6–40.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.2–14.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 30.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 23.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.8%CMS range 5.6–14.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.24 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 141 beds and averages 127.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.78 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.45 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
67 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide physical assistance and/or use of transfer device during ambulation (walking) to ensure safety for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR), who was assisting Resident 1 while walking, did not provide a hand support to Resident 1 due to DOR was holding a cellphone on her left hand and holding a wheelchair on her right hand. This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling, sustaining a right shoulder tendon (connective tissue that connects the muscle to the bone) tear, suffering from severe pain, and going to the general acute care hospital. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) Communication and Progress Note (SBAR), dated 5/15/24 at 1:40 p.m., the SBAR indicated, Patient [Resident 1]was being ambulated with the use of FWW [Front-Wheeled Walker] under rehab [rehabilitation] supervision while reaching back to her wheelchair to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 experienced repeated seizures (sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings, and consciousness) and the Registered Nurse (RN 1) failed to identify the seizure activity, call the physician promptly, send Resident 1 out to a higher level of care promptly and ensure qualified staff monitored the resident when the resident was experiencing seizures. These failures resulted in a delay in receiving prompt medical attention and resulted in an overall decline in Resident 1 ' s physical condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR) dated 11/22/23, the AR indicated, diagnoses including Unspecified convulsions (sudden, violent, irregular movement of a limb or of the body, caused by involuntary contraction of muscles and associated especially with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses were monitoring an antidepressant's (medication used to treat depression [persistent feeling of sadness]) adverse reactions (undesired harmful effect from a medication) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 having adverse reactions to Paxil (antidepressant).Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 4/8/26, the AR indicated, DIAGNOSIS. MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER (persistent, intense feeling of sadness).During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/2/26 at 2:10 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR) dated 4/2/26, was reviewed. The OSR indicated, Paxil Oral Tablet 20 MG (milligrams - unit of mass) . one time a day for Depression m/b (manifested by) verbalization of sadness. The OSR indicated, there was no physician order to monitor Paxil's adverse reactions on Resident 1. DON stated Resident 1 had been on Paxil since 8/6/25 and there had been no monitoring of Paxil's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:Supervise one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after Resident 1 attempted to commit suicide (when a person intentionally harms themselves with the goal of ending their life, and they die as a result). This failure resulted in Resident 1's second suicide attempt.Follow their policy and procedure for Suicide Prevention Guidelines, to monitor one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after Resident 1 attempted to commit suicide. This had the potential for Resident 1 to successfully kill herself and/or harm herself.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission RECORD (AR), dated 3/25/26, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (a chronic mental health condition which causes people to lose touch with reality, such as hearing voices or holding false beliefs, while also experiencing intense mood swings) bipolar type (a mental health condition characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-24 · tag F0943 — isolatedGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled staff (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA]) 1, completed annual abuse training. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for abuse.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's IDT (Interdisciplinary Team- group of professionals from different disciplines who work together toward common, patient-centered goals) Notes dated 3/16/26, the IDT indicated, Responsible party.reported.(Resident 1) complained that a nurse (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] 1) from the NOC (night) shift was rude and mean.During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/17/26 at 1:55 p.m. with Human Resource Assistant (HRA), CNA 1's abuse training dated 2/7/23 was reviewed. The abuse training indicated CNA 1 last received training on 2/7/23 (more than three years prior) HRA was unable to provide more recent abuse training for CNA 1.During an interview on 3/17/26 at 2:05 p.m. with Administrator, Administrator stated that abuse training should have been completed annually.During an interview on 4/8/26 at 3:05 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the follow-up investigation report was completed within five working days for an allegation of abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in an incomplete abuse investigation.Findings:During a review of the S (situation) B (background) A (appearance) R (review and report) communication form and progress note (SBAR-used to report change of condition to the physician) dated 2/21/26 at 6:54 p.m., the SBAR indicated, CNA (certified nursing assistant) reported verbal abuse from Daughter.Per CNA, overheard argument from resident's room during meal pass.this noted on 2/21/26 at 5:30 p.m.During an interview on 3/5/26 at 11:38 a.m. with Administrator, Administrator stated the Director of Nursing (DON) was responsible for completing the five-day report.During an interview on 3/5/26 at 11:51 a.m. (nine working days after the incident) with DON, DON stated the five-day report was not completed and should have been.During a review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Care Plan (CP), was implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when wellness checks were not completed. This failure had the potential for staff to be unaware of Resident 1 experiencing an alteration in her well-being.Findings:During a review of the S (situation) B (background) A (appearance) R (review and report) communication form and progress note (SBAR-used to report change of condition to the physician) dated 2/21/26 at 6:54 p.m., the SBAR indicated, CNA (certified nursing assistant) reported verbal abuse from Daughter.Per CNA, overheard argument from resident's room during meal pass.During a review of Resident 1's CP dated 2/23/26, the CP indicated, Alteration in well-being related to.verbal altercation between (Resident 1) and her daughter.Interventions.Social Service Designee to conduct wellness check x (times) 72 hours.During a concurrent interview and record review, on 3/5/26 at 11:35 a.m. with Social Service Director (SSD), Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed. SSD was unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0774 — isolatedHelp the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of three sampled staff (Facility Staff [FS] 1, FS 2, and Activity Director [AD]), were competent to utilize the facility transport vehicle. This failure had the potential for residents to not be transported safely and for injuries to occur.Findings: During an interview on 12/18/25 at 12:10 p.m. with FS 1, FS 1 stated he provided transport to residents in the past, using the facility transport vehicle, when leadership (not identified) ask him to. During a review of the facility employee files (EF), not dated, the EF indicated FS 2 also used the facility transport vehicle to transport residents. During an interview on 12/18/25 at 2:05 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated the facility provided transport to residents to and from appointments as well as to go on outings for activities. During an interview on 12/18/25, at 2:32 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD stated FS 1, FS 2, and staff in activities use the facility van to transport residents to appointments and/or to go on outings.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse Prevention Program, when references were not checked prior to hire, orientation and abuse training were not provided for one of one sampled staff (certified nursing assistant [CNA 1]). These failures had the potential to place facility's residents at risk for abuse.Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 1/15/26 at 10:45 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), CNA 1's employee file was reviewed. DON stated CNA 1 was from an agency, DON was unable to provide a hire date for CNA 1. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 1/15/26 at 12:32 p.m. with Director of Staff Development (DSD), CNA 1's employee file was reviewed. DSD stated the staffing agency ensured CNA 1 had all the training that was required. DSD stated the staffing agency performed all background checks and reference checks. DSD confirmed the facility does not provide training or reference checks for the agency staff. DSD stated she did not have an exact date of hire, but CNA 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) call light was placed within reach. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's unmet care needs.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview, on 1/6/26 at 1:55 p.m. with Resident 1, in resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. Resident 1 stated, They (certified nursing assistant [CNA]) do not give me my call light.During an observation on 1/6/26 at 2:36 p.m. outside of Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was heard yelling, CNA I don't have a call button. Resident 1 continued to call out for a CNA until 2:43 p.m.During a concurrent observation and interview, on 1/6/26 at 2:43 p.m. with CNA 4, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying in bed with the head of bed elevated. Resident 1's call button was looped to the bed rail but was hanging behind the top right-hand side of the mattress. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 could not reach the call light. CNA 1 stated the call light should be in easy reach for the residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported and investigated timely for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in a delay in reporting and Resident 1 not to be protected from further abuse.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set, (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 10/28/25, the MDS indicated, Resident 1' s BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status- standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the mental processes that allow individuals to think, learn, and remember) score was 15 (13 to 15 points indicates the resident has cognitive intactness).During a review of Resident 1's SBAR (situation, background, appearance, and review) Communication Form, (SBAR) dated 12/21/25, the SBAR indicated, Attention brought by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) that resident sustained a skin tear (an acute, traumatic wound where the top layers of skin separate from the underlying tissue due to friction, shearing, or blunt force) while changing her and doing ADLs (Activities of Daily Living - basic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) wound was treated by a licensed nurse. This failure had the potential for allergic reaction (an immune system [a complex network of cells tissues and organs that defend against bacteria] overreaction to a harmless substance, causing symptoms ranging from mild to severe, and life-threatening) and/or infection (occurs when harmful bacteria enter the body, multiply, and trigger an immune response) for Resident 1.Findings:During an interview on 1/6/26 at 3:30 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, CNA 2 stated during care Resident 1 got a skin tear (an acute, traumatic wound where the top layers of skin separate from the underlying tissue due to friction, shearing, or blunt force) and CNA 3 went to the treatment nurse and got a triple antibiotic ointment (a combination of three medications used to treat or prevent infections in minor cuts and scrapes, to promote faster healing by stopping bacterial growth) and a pad to clean the skin tear and a band aid. CNA 3 cleaned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 55 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Complete reference checks for two of three sampled employees (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA 1 and CNA 2) prior to employment and;2. Complete the background check for CNA 1.These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk for abuse.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/12/25 at 12:20 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON) and Human Resource Assistant (HRA), CNA 1's employee file was reviewed. CNA 1's employee file indicated CNA 1 was hired 3/25/25. There were no reference checks done or exclusion (office of inspector general) background check completed prior to employment. DON and HRA stated per policy the reference checks and background check should have been completed prior to employment.During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/12/25 at 12:20 p.m. with DON and HRA, CNA 2's employee file was reviewed. CNA 2's employee file indicated CNA 2 was hired 1/9/23. There was no reference checks done prior to employment. DON and HRA stated per policy the reference checks should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled employees, (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA 1] and CNA 2), had the required criminal background checks prior to their date of hire. This failure had the potential to expose the residents to staff with criminal backgrounds and exposing residents to risks for abuse.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review, on 11/20/25 at 1:22 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), CNA 1 and CNA 2's employee files were reviewed. DON stated CNA 1's date of hire was 10/6/25, and CNA 2's date of hire was 8/19/24. CNA 1 and CNA 2's criminal background checks were reviewed. DON confirmed no dates were documented on CNA 1 and CNA 2's criminal background checks.During an interview on 11/20/25 at 1:51 p.m. with Human Resources (HR), HR stated criminal checks were completed before hire date. HR stated she takes screen grabs (picture of computer screen) of criminal background checks; HR confirmed no dates were captured on the screen grabs. HR stated she was unable to provide evidence that criminal background…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-14 · tag F0628 — widespreadProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:1. Provide discharge notice before discharging one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to include the reasons for discharge. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 being discharged inappropriately and not prepared for his discharge.2. Send a copy of the notice of discharge to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (Ombudsman-an elderly advocacy agency) for 12 of 13 residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 9, Resident 10, Resident 11 and Resident 12). This failure had the potential to prevent the Ombudsman from assisting and advocating for Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 9, Resident 10, Resident 11 and Resident 12 during their discharge process.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), printed 11/14/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was [AGE] years old was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective discharge plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was discharged home without home health services (where health care professionals provide health care services to the resident at his home) as ordered by the physician and failed to document a post-discharge plan of care in Resident 1's discharge summary. These failures had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for not achieving his health care goals and preventable hospital and/or skilled nursing facility readmission.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 11/14/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was [AGE] years old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and unsteadiness on feet. The AR indicated Resident 1's Responsible Party (RP-the person who makes medical decisions on behalf of the resident) was Family Member (FM) 1.During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). This failure had the potential for abuse to continue and had the potential for other residents to be abused.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission RECORD (AR), dated 8/5/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was a [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by excessive and persistent worry, fear, and nervousness that can significantly interfere with daily life), muscle weakness, legal blindness, history of falling, and need for assistance with personal care. During a review of Resident 1's ED (Emergency Department) Physician Notes (EDPN), dated 7/14/25, the EDPN indicated Resident 1 arrived at the acute hospital emergency department stating, Needed to get out of truck and that they [unknown] were crossing the road,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure for five of 72 sampled residents (Resident 47, Resident 86, Resident 96, Resident 105, Resident 92) call lights were answered promptly. This failure had the potential to result in residents' unmet needs. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/4/25 at 9:30 a.m. in Resident 47's room, Resident 47's call light was on. Resident 47 stated she needed some help from her Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) because she had a dirty brief. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/4/25 at 9:31 a.m. in the hallway outside of Resident 47's room, a light was on above Resident 47's door indicating her call light was on. CNA 4 was observed walking past the call light and going in and out of rooms on the opposite side of the hallway. CNA 4 stated she was new to the facility and was not sure which CNA was assigned to Resident 47's side of the hallway. During an observation on 2/4/25 at 9:35 a.m., CNA 4 entered Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of three of 27 sampled residents (Resident 93, Resident 128, and Resident 96) when: 1. Staff did not follow Resident 93's physician order to remove a Lidocaine patch (a pain medication applied directly to the skin) from Resident 93's back after 12 hours of application. This failure resulted in Resident 93 having Lidocaine applied for a period longer than prescribed. 2. Staff administered a Nifedipine Extended Release tablet (a medication to treat high blood pressure especially formulated to slowly release the drug into the bloodstream over an extended period and to be administered whole) crushed into a powder to Resident 128. This failure resulted in Resident 128 receiving Nifedipine at a higher dose than prescribed. 3. Staff failed to ensure Morphine and Methadone (controlled drugs with a high potential for abuse and addiction) prescribed for Resident 96 were properly accounted for. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards for food service safety and sanitary kitchen conditions when: 1. Dented canned products were retained in dry storage for use. 2. Dry food storage container lid was not closed and secured per safe storage and guidelines. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (illness caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) for at-risk vulnerable residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/3/25 at 8:59 a.m. with Dietary Manager (DM), in the dry food storage room (DFSR), multiple dented 50-ounce tomato soup cans were stored. DM stated the dented tomato soup cans shouldn't be in here, and needed to be removed. DM stated there were nine out of 12 tomato soup cans dented. DM stated the dented tomato soup cans posed a food safety risk. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/3/25 at 2:16 p.m. with DM, the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, SANITATION AND INFECTION CONTROL SUBJECT: CANNED AND DRY GOODS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices when: 1. Three of three sampled personal laundry cart covers were soiled and discolored. This failure had the potential for contaminating clean linen and spread of infection to residents. 2. One of three sampled clean linen closets had a dark discolored floor with debris. This failure had the potential for contaminating clean linen and spread of infection to residents. 3. Two of two Registered Nurses (RN 1 and RN 3) failed to clean and disinfect glucometers (medical devices used to measure the amount of glucose[sugar] in the blood) according to facility policy and manufacturer's guidelines. after resident use. This failure had the potential to expose residents to bloodborne pathogens (microorganisms [bacteria or virus] in the blood that can cause life threatening disease). Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/4/25 at 1:58 p.m. in the laundry room with Housekeeping and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nine of nine employees' (Plant and Maintenance [PM], Housekeeper [HSK] 1, Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] 1, CNA 2, Registered Nurse [RN] 2, Licensed Vocational Nurse [LVN] 1, Nursing Assistant [NA] 1, NA 2, and NA 3) Covid 19 (infectious respiratory illness) vaccination status were tracked and recorded. This failure had the potential to spread Covid-19 to residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During a review of the facility's Employee Covid-19 Vaccination Log, (undated), the Employee Covid-19 Vaccination Log indicated, the following employees had no record of Covid-19 vaccination status: a) PM, hired on 7/16/24. b) HSK 1, hired on 11/14/24. c) CNA 1, hired on 8/12/24. d) CNA 2, hired on 8/15/24. e) RN 2, hired on 11/7/24. f) LVN 1, hired on 10/10/24. g) NA 1, hired on 1/2/25. h) NA 2, hired on 12/31/24. i) NA 3, hired on 1/2/25. During an interview on 2/5/25 at 9:05 a.m. with Infection Preventionist Nurse (IPN), IPN stated, The recently hired staff who have no Covid-19 vaccine immunization record were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment tool that measures the health of nursing home residents) was accurate for one of one sampled resident (Resident 139). This failure resulted in an inaccurate medical record regarding Resident 139's discharge location. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/6/25 at 1:29 p.m. with MDS Coordinator (MDSC), Resident 139's MDS was reviewed. The MDS indicated, Resident 139 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 12/20/24. MDS Section A2105 indicated Resident 139 was discharged to a short-term general hospital for acute care. MDSC stated Resident 139 was discharged to a short-term general hospital based on the MDS. MDSC stated the MDS was completed by the Social Services Director on 12/31/24. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/6/25 at 1:32 p.m. with MDSC, Resident 139's Nurse's Notes, (NN) dated 12/20/24 were reviewed. The NN indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fluids were accessible at the bedside for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 47). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 47 not having sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/4/25 at 10:33 a.m. in Resident 47's room, the bedside table containing a water pitcher and cup was located next to the window across from the bed and not within Resident 47's reach. No straw was observed on the bedside table. Resident 47 stated she could drink water by herself if a straw was available. Resident 47 stated she had been having diarrhea. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/4/25 at 10:49 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 3, Resident 47's bedside table containing her water pitcher and cup was observed to be located next to the window across from the bed. RN 3 stated the bedside table should be within Resident 47's reach. RN 3 stated Resident 47 was at risk for dehydration, especially since she was having diarrhea.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor two of two sampled residents (Resident 18 and Resident 41) oxygen saturations (how much oxygen is in the blood). This failure had the potential for Resident 18 and Resident 41 to not receive oxygen as ordered and become hypoxic (low levels of oxygen in the blood that can cause headache, difficult breathing, confusion and increased rate of breathing). Findings: During an observation on 2/3/25 at 9:14 a.m. in Resident 18's room, Resident 18 was laying in bed with eyes closed. Resident 18 was not wearing oxygen. During an observation on 2/4/25 at 8:40 a.m. in Resident 18's room, Resident 18 was laying in bed with eyes closed. Resident 18 was not wearing oxygen. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/5/25 at 9:19 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 2, Resident 18's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 2/5/25 was reviewed. The OSR indicated, O2 [oxygen] INHALATION [breathing in] AT 2 LPM [liters per minute] VIA [by] NASAL CANNULA [flexible tube with two prongs that are inserted into the nostrils to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) 1 had current cardiopulmonary certification (CPR-healthcare provider demonstrated training in life-saving intervention competency when loss of pulse and/or breathing in a medical emergency) as indicated in the facility's job description titled, Registered Nurse (RN) for one of 15 sampled RN's (RN) 1. This failure resulted in RN 1's CPR certification employment requirement not being met and had the potential for adverse vulnerable resident outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE] at 2:42 p.m. with Human Resource Manager (HRM), RN 1's employee file was reviewed. The employee file indicated RN 1's date of hire was [DATE]. HRM stated RN 1 did not have current CPR certification to meet RN employment requirement. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 3:19 p.m. with RN 1, RN 1 was working in the facility's East wing. RN 1 stated she did not have a current CPR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 18) was provided adaptive equipment (specialized tools, devices and modifications designed to assist individuals with disabilities or functional limitations with eating) during meals. This failure had the potential to result in nutritional decline. Findings: During a review of Resident 18's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 2/5/25, the OSR indicated, Pt [Patient] to have build [sic] up foam utensils with all meals, with an order date of 11/3/23. During a review of Resident 18's Care Plan (CP), (undated), the CP indicated, Resident at risk for Nutritional Decline Due to.Need Adaptive Equipment r/t [related to] lack of coordination.Resident to use utensils with soft build-up handles (brown). During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/5/25 at 12:27 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 2 in Resident 18's room, Resident 18 was eating lunch with regular utensils. RN 2 stated Resident 18 was using regular utensils and would have to check to see if adaptive equipment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident shower rooms in a clean and sanitary condition for five of five sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, and Resident 5). This failure had the potential for spread of infection and/or negative health outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/16/24 at 11:20 a.m. with Facility Director (FD) the following was observed: a. In the East Wing Shower Room (EWR), there was blackish spotted discoloration noted to the grout (paste-like material used to fill in gaps between tiles) in the second and third shower stall. The grout to the toilet in the EWR was brown, black, and yellow in discoloration with the grout noted to be missing and/or cracked. Moving further into the EWR where there was a storage of resident shower chairs and shower gurneys was black spotted discoloration to the ceiling and floor tile that was markedly discolored with dirt/grim (a built-up combination of dirt, dust, and grease). The EWR had two blue green shower chairs that had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) with dignity and respect. This failure had the potential for emotional distress for Resident 1. Findings: During an interview on 11/18/24 at 9:51 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated on 11/9/24, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 observed Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA) 1 placed her hand over Resident 1's mouth as she was screaming to quiet Resident 1 down. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) under the section BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status – an assessment of cognition [mental processes including perception, memory, and thought]), dated 10/24/24, the BIMS indicated, Resident 1 had a score of 9 (cognition moderately impaired). During an interview on 11/18/24 at 11:09 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated she could not recall the incident occurred on 11/9/24. During an interview on 11/18/24 at 12:15 p.m. with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure on Abuse Prevention Program for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for further abuse to occur. Findings: During an interview on 11/18/24 at 9:51 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated on 11/9/24, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 observed Restorative Nurse Assistant (RNA) 1 placed her hand over Resident 1's mouth in an attempt to stop Resident 1 from screaming. During an interview on 11/18/24 at 12:15 p.m. with CNA 1, CNA 1 stated on 11/9/24 at approximately 10 a.m. she observed Resident 1 in her wheelchair coming out of her room and screaming, Help me. CNA 1 stated she then saw RNA 1 placed her hand over Resident 1's mouth to stop her from screaming. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 was screaming help me through RNA 1's hand. CNA 1 stated she reported this allegation of abuse immediately to her supervisor. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/18/24 at 12:50 p.m. with DON, security camera footage for 11/9/24 in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) on safety for residents when tools were found on the floor unattended. This failure had the potential to result in injury for residents, staff, and visitors. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/27/24 at 2:06 p.m. with Administrator in the hallway by the Director of Nursing (DON) office, there were nine one-inch screws on the floor. Administrator verified the findings. During an observation on 9/27/24 at 2:06 p.m. in an office, by the door, there was screwdriver and repair parts on the floor. The office door was left open. During an interview on 9/27/24 at 2:20 p.m. with the Maintenance Assistant (MA), the MA stated he left the tools and repair parts unattended. He stated it was not safe to leave tools on the floor. He stated he was supposed to clean up before he left his work area. During an interview on 9/27/24 at 2:26 p.m. with Administrator, Administrator stated, The door was not closed. A resident could reach out (the tools). During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) who are high risk for falls were near the nurse's station according to the plan of care. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 and Resident 3 falling repeatedly and sustaining injury. Findings: During an observation on 9/18/24 at 9:54 a.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1's bed is by the window. There were two rooms, one supply room down the hallway, and around the corner between Resident 1's room and the nurse's station. During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), dated 3/13/24, the CP indicated, Resident [1] with actual unwitnessed fall on 3/13/24. Interventions: Keep resident [1] close to [nursing] station for closer monitoring. The CP dated 6/18/24 indicated, Resident with actual fall on 6/18/24. Interventions: Keep resident close to station for closer monitoring. During a review of Resident 1's SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) Communication and Progress Note (SBAR), dated 9/15/24 at 12:16…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the state agency for five of eight sampled Residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5) when: A. Resident 1 reported to staff multiple incidents of physical altercation with Resident 2. B. Resident 3 reported to staff multiple incidents of sexual allegations against Resident 4. C. Staff witnessed Resident 4 being sexually inappropriate with Resident 5. These failures had the potential for delayed investigation and put all residents at risk for further abuse. Findings: A. During an interview on 9/12/24 at 2:51 p.m. with Social Services Assistant (SSA), SSA stated on 8/19/24, Resident 1 informed the staff he had a physical altercation with Resident 2. SSA stated her and Social Services Director (SSD) checked the facility security cameras and found no evidence Resident 1 and Resident 2 had a physical altercation. SSA stated the allegation of physical abuse between Resident 1 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-18 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain dental services for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 6 and Resident 7). This failure had the potential to result in progressive oral health decline, oral pain, infection, and weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 6 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) under the section BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status – an assessment of cognition [mental processes including perception, memory, and thought]), dated 8/21/24, the BIMS indicated, Resident 6 had a score of 15 (cognitively intact). During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/12/24 at 11:18 a.m. with Resident 6 in his room, Resident 6 was observed to have multiple discolored dark brown to yellowed stained teeth specifically to his lower mouth. Some of the teeth appeared broken exposing the inner aspects of the tooth. Resident 6 ' s lower gums appeared red in color and swollen. Resident 6 stated he cannot get anyone to get him an appointment with the dentist. Resident 6 stated he talked to the social services (not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of four sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4) complaints were processed according to their policy and procedure. This failure had the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of the residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) under the section BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status - an assessment of cognition [mental processes including perception, memory, and thought]), dated 7/10/24, the BIMS indicated, Resident 2 had a score of 15 (cognitively intact). During an interview on 8/28/24 at 10:53 a.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated there were issues with the Registry Nurses (RNN - licensed nurses who receives compensation from a third party to work at a nursing facility as needed) (not identified) not passing the medications on time during the night shifts. During a review of Resident 3's MDS- under the section BIMS, dated 7/8/24, the BIMS indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 was competent to pass medications to one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for adverse health outcomes. Findings: During an interview on 8/28/24 at 11:02 a.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated approximately one week ago (not sure of the exact date), she noticed at the beginning of her shift (morning) that Resident 1 ' s tube feeding (an open system used for nutrition provided to a resident via a tube inserted through the stomach) bag had an abnormal color and appeared to have medication floating in it. LVN 1 stated LVN 2 had worked the prior shift (night shift) before she came in and noticed the issue with Resident 1 ' s tube feeding bag. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) under the section BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status - an assessment of cognition [mental processes including perception, memory, and thought]), dated 8/2/24, the BIMS indicated, Resident 1 had a score of 13 (cognitively intact). During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their fall intervention for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have serious injury or harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission RECORD (AR), dated 8/5/24, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosis including Hemiplegia (inability to move one side of the body), hemiparesis (one sided muscle weakness), cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain), aphasia (difficulty reading, speaking, understanding and writing due to damage of the brain), muscle weakness, history of falls. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) under the section BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status – an assessment of cognition [mental processes including perception, memory, and thought], dated 7/1/24, the BIMS indicated, Resident 1 was not able to be assessed due to being rarely/never understood. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure titled, Enteral Therapy/Tube Feeding, to ensure two of five sampled residents' (Resident 1 and Resident 5) tube feeding (tube attached to the stomach used to pass through nutrition, hydration, and medication) bags were labeled with dates and time. This failure had a potential to result in Resident 1 and Resident 5 consuming contaminated feeding formula from old tube feeding bags and result in adverse health outcomes. Findings: During an observation on 7/19/2024 at 9:45 a.m. in Resident 1's room, there were two tube feeding bags hanging on a pole which were not labeled with time and date. During a review of Resident 1's admission Records (AR), dated 4/23/2024, the AR indicated, Resident 1 had a diagnosis of encounter for attention to gastrostomy (G-Tube-tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach for nutrition, hydration, and medication). During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN), dated 7/14/2024, the PN indicated Resident 1 is on Jevity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a comfortable and safe temperature for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for harm due to heat related issues and/or for residents to be uncomfortable. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/27/24 at 11:55 a.m. with Facility Director (FD), in Resident 1's room, Resident 1's room had a temperature of 84.4 degrees (°) Fahrenheit (F). FD verified Resident 1's room was 84.4°F. During an interview on 6/27/24 at 12:31 p.m. with Administrator, Administrator stated room temperatures are to be between 71°F and 81°F. During a review of Resident 1's admission RECORD (AR), dated 5/17/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 had the following medical diagnosis: a. Epilepsy (abnormal electrical brain activity also known as a seizure). b. Aphasia (a language disorder that affects how you communicate). c. Hemiplegia (one-sided muscle paralysis [inability to move] or weakness). d. Encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain). e. Dysphagia (difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P&P) on abuse for one of three residents (Resident 1) when: a. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not immediately report an allegation of abuse to facility management. b. CNA 1 was not removed from working with residents immediately after an allegation of abuse. These failures resulted in a potential delay in investigation, had the potential for abuse to continue and had the potential for other residents to be abused. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) under the section BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status – an assessment of cognition [mental processes including perception, memory, and thought], dated 3/1/24, the BIMS indicated, Resident 1 had a score of 14 (Cognitively intact). During an interview on 6/20/24 at 11:27 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated he had an altercation with CNA 1, in which CNA 1 allegedly punched him. Resident 1 could not recall the date the alleged abuse occurred. During an interview on 6/20/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program for two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure had the potential for negative consequences such as insect bites (both poisonous and non-poisonous) and spreading of pest to resident areas (outdoors and indoors). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool) under the section Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS – an assessment tool for cognition [the gaining of knowledge and understanding]), dated 1/18/24, the BIMS indicated, Resident 1 had a score of 15 (cognitively intact). During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/29/24 at 2:12 p.m. with Resident 1, in the north side resident patio area, Resident 1 stated she comes out to the resident patio every day for about one to two hours. Resident 1 stated yesterday (5/28/24) she was sitting in a patio chair and there was a possible black widow spider (a very poisonous spider with an appearance of a black body with an hourglass shaped red mark.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with dignity and respect when Resident 1 was moved to the dining room to sleep for one night. This failure had the potential to result in psychological harm and Resident 1 experiencing fearfulness. Findings: During an interview on 2/29/24 at 5:04 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated, Yes, we had a resident [Resident 1] in the dining room last night [2/28/24]. It was late last night, we had a late admission that ended up testing positive for COVID after showing symptoms upon arrival to the facility. RN 1 stated the facility does not have any other rooms available (for the new admission), so Resident 1 ended up sleeping in the dining room. During an interview on 2/29/24 at 5:13 p.m. with the Administrator, the Administrator stated, This is not our normal process, we have never had to have a resident sleep in the dining room. During an interview on 2/29/24 at 5:15 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, The family was called last night and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-06 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat four of seven sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 7) with dignity and respect. This failure had the potential for negative consequences up to and including psychological harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) under Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS – an assessment tool for cognition), dated 12/11/23, the BIMS indicated, Resident 2 had a score of 15 out of 15 (cognition is intact). During an interview on 12/11/23 at 1:30 p.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated approximately three Sundays ago he had a concern for his friend Resident 1 ' s health. Resident 2 stated Resident 1 was having multiple uncontrolled seizures (sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings, and consciousness). Resident 2 stated he told Registered Nurse (RN) 1 about Resident 1 not looking good and she (RN 1) told him,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 62 sampled resident's (Resident 334 and Resident 25) change in condition notification was not provided when: 1. Resident 334's Responsible party (RP) was not notified for a change in medical treatment plan. This failure resulted in the Resident 334's RP to be unable to participate in the plan of care. 2. Resident 25's Physician (MD) was not notified for refusal of medications. This failure had the potential to result in increased psychological behaviors, memory impairment, swelling, and blood pressure. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/9/24 at 10:25 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5, in Resident 334's room, Resident 334's right and left feet great toes nails were thick and overgrown past the nail bed. LVN 5 stated, Resident 334 needed podiatry [treatment and care of the foot] care. LVN 5 stated, Resident 334's right and left great toenails were about 1/2 inch [unit of measurement] thick and the right great toe tip had a reddened area. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 62 residents (Resident 80), received an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment used as a care-planning tool) Section B 1000 Vision (uses numerical scale 0-4, a score of 0 indicates Adequate-sees fine details and regular print in newspaper/books, score of 1 indicates Impaired-sees large print but not regular print in newspaper, score of 2 indicates Moderately Impaired-limited vision, not able to see newspaper headlines but can identify objects, score of 3 indicates Highly Impaired-object identification in question, but eyes appear to follow objects, and a score of 4, indicates Severely Impaired-no vision or sees only light, colors or shapes; eyes do not appear to follow objects) assessment by a MDS trained Social Services Assistant (SSA). This failure had the potential to negatively impact Patient 80's safety, psychosocial, and care needs. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/10/24 at 2:55 p.m. with SSA, Resident 80's MDS Section B 1000 Vision, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete and coordinate the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR-federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not incorrectly placed in nursing homes or long-term care facilities, determines the appropriate setting for the individual, and recommends any specialized services and/or rehabilitative services the individual needs) process for one of 62 sampled residents (Resident 25). This failure had the potential for Resident 25 to not receive necessary services to meet mental and psychosocial needs. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/10/24 at 11:41 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 25's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Screening, dated 8/9/23 was reviewed. The PASRR indicated, Does the individual have a serious diagnosed mental disorder such as Depressive Disorder (a mental illness that can cause depressed mood), Anxiety Disorder (worry and fear about everyday situations), Panic Disorder (anxiety disorder characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 62 residents (Resident 133) had a baseline care plan (includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs) developed which guided his dialysis catheter site (dialysis catheter - a tube inserted into a vein to carry blood to dialysis machine used to filter blood) care. This failure had the potential to place Resident 133 at risk for skin and blood borne infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 133's admission Record (AR) dated [DATE], the AR indicated, Resident 133 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:38 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated Resident 133 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged due to his death on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 133's History and Physical (H&P) dated [DATE], the H&P indicated, Diagnosis' included: Type 2 DM (diabetes mellitus-high blood sugar), End…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 62 residents (Resident 80 and Resident 95) had a comprehensive care plan (includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs) developed and implemented which addressed: 1. Resident 80's visual impairment needs. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Patient 80's safety, psycosocial, and care needs. 2. Resident 95's Foley catheter (FC- a device that drains urine from the bladder into a collection bag). This failure had the potential for Resident 95 to develop an infection and have care needs not met. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/10/24 at 2:55 p.m. with SSA, Resident 80's MDS Section B 1000 Vision (uses numerical scale 0-4, a score of 0 indicates Adequate-sees fine details and regular print in newspaper/books, score of 1 indicates Impaired-sees large print but not regular print in newspaper, score of 2 indicates Moderately Impaired-limited vision, not able to see newspaper headlines…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for four of 62 sampled residents (Resident 5, Resident 69, Resident 83 and Resident 21) when: 1. CNA 5 served meals without ensuring Resident 5 and Resident 69 had performed hand hygiene. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 5 and Resident 69's health. 2. Housekeeping was not wearing a protective gown while handling unclean residents linen. This failure had the potential to spread infection to residents and staff. 3. Transmission-based precautions (TBP) were not followed for Resident 83. This failure had the potential to result in the transmission of infection and communicable diseases to residents, staff and visitors. 4. The enteral feeding bag (method of supplying nutrients directly into the stomach by use of a feeding tube) label was not labelled consistent with Resident 21's physician's order (PO). This failure had the potential to result in weight loss, dehydration, and malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition, caused by not having enough to eat).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Low Air Loss (LAL) mattress was set according to weight for one of 62 sampled residents (Resident 21). This failure had the potential to result in a new or worsening pressure injury. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/10/24 at 8:16 a.m. in Resident 21's room, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, Resident 21's LAL mattress was set to over 320 pounds (lbs-unit of weight measurement). LVN 3 stated the LAL mattress was not set correctly. LVN 3 stated if it is too firm, it can cause a pressure injury. During a review of Resident 21's Weights and Vitals Summary (WVS), dated 1/10/24, the WVS indicated, 12/09/2023.150.9 Lbs. During an interview on 1/10/24 at 11:57 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated the LAL for Resident 21 should have been set to the correct weight, or else he can get a decubitus ulcer (pressure injury) or it could get worse. DON stated Resident 21 recently had a new stage 2 (partial thickness loss of top layers of skin, presenting as a shallow open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was identified as high risk for falls was free from fall hazards for one of 62 sampled residents (Resident 21). This failure had the potential to result in a fall with injury. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/8/24 at 12:15 p.m. in the hall outside of Resident 21's room, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, Resident 21 was being repositioned in bed. When staff left the room they left the bed in the highest position. CNA 1 stated the bed should not have been left that high for any Resident. During an interview on 1/10/24 at 11:55 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, the bed should not have been left up in high position. The bed should have been lowered after the CNAs were done providing care. DON stated Resident 21 could have fallen and gotten injured. During a review of Resident 21's Fall Risk Assessment, (FRA) dated 12/19/23, the FRA indicated, Score: 15 Category: High Risk. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the controlled substance (highly addictive drug or chemical regulated to prevent abuse) count was being completed before and after each shift for three of four sampled medication carts (East Wing (C2), East Wing (C 2-3), and [NAME] Wing). This failure had the potential to result in loss or diversion (concept involving the transfer of any legally prescribed controlled substance from the individual for whom it was prescribed to another person for any illicit use) of controlled substances. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/9/24 at 11:09 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, East Wing C2's Shift Verification of Controlled Substances (SVCS), dated December 2023 and January 2024 were reviewed. The SVCS forms had missing signatures on multiple dates for different shifts in December 2023 and January 2024. LVN 2 stated there were blanks in the record. During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/9/24 at 11:15 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, [NAME] Wing Shift Verification of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Storage, when medications were improperly stored for one of two sampled medication carts (North Medication Cart).This failure had the potential to result in contamination of medications and adverse outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/10/24 at 10:35 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4, on North Wing's Medication Cart, a jar of Vicks VapoRub Cough Suppressant [reduce intensity] Topical [applied to the skin] Analgesic [pain relieving] Ointment was stored next to a roll of prepackaged medications intended for oral consumption. LVN 4 stated the VapoRub should have been stored on the treatment cart or in a container separate from the oral medications. During an interview on 1/10/24 at 12:11 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated internal and external medications should be stored separately in the medication carts. During a review of the facility P&P titled, Medication Storage, dated 2018, the P&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. To implement infection surveillance measures that meet infection prevention standards. 2. Follow transmission-based precautions for one of eight residents sampled (Resident 1). 3. Review infection control policy and procedures (P&P) annually. These failures had the potential to contribute to increased Covid-19 cases, and adverse health outcomes for vulnerable residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/3/24, at 8:09 a.m. with Receptionist, the facility front entrance did not have an observed process for Covid-19 symptoms screening upon entry into the facility. Receptionist stated the facility does not screen for Covid-19 symptoms for everyone entering the facility. During an interview on 1/3/23, at 8:42 a.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated the current process for persons entering the facility as visitors and staff is to wear an N-95 mask (a mask that has high filtration for the respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect three of four sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3) from being inappropriately touched by Resident 4. This failure had the potential to place these residents at risk for further abuse and feeling unprotected in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's facility chart the CHARTING – Alleged Perpetrator (CAP), dated 9/24/23, the CAP indicated, Resident 4 on 9/23/23 inappropriately touched Resident 1's breast and lifted the blouse of Resident 2 on separate times of the day. Under the section titled other pertinent information, the facility indicated the interventions to be put into place for Resident 4 were to monitor Resident 4 closely while socializing with other residents and to monitor Resident 4's whereabouts and monitor closely while awake and out of his room. During a review of Resident 4's BIMS [Brief Interview Mental Status – an assessment tool for memory and orientation], dated 9/13/23, the BIMS indicated, Resident 4 had a score of 14 (a score of 14 indicates a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-06 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Transfer or Discharge for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1's inappropriate discharge and violation of resident's rights. Findings: During an interview on 10/10/23 at 9:32 a.m. with Complainant, Complainant stated the facility sent Resident 1 to the acute hospital for treatment on 10/6/23. Complainant stated the acute hospital informed him Resident 1 was ready to be discharged back to the facility on [DATE] but the facility refused to take Resident 1 back. Complainant stated the acute hospital had to place Resident 1 at another skilled nursing facility. Complainant stated he went to the facility and spoke with the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) who informed him Resident 1 did not meet the criteria to be in their facility and the facility was not a hotel. During an interview on 10/10/23 at 11:15 a.m. with Medical Biller (MB), MB stated Resident 1 was on a bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
ased on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement their intervention for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to ensure she was kept away from Resident 3 who scratched her left forearm during an altercation. This failure resulted in Resident 3 continuing to enter Resident 1's room without consent, Resident 1 being struck again by Resident 3 after the initial physical altercation, resulted in another resident (Resident 2) having his room entered by Resident 3 without consent and had the potential for other residents to be affected. Findings: During an interview 9/12/23 at 10:56 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated on 9/3/23, Resident 3 entered Resident 1's room. Facility staff (not identified) heard screaming from the room and observed Resident 1 and Resident 3 tugging a marker from each other. After facility separated Resident 1 and Resident 3, Resident 1 stated Resident 3 had grabbed and clawed her left forearm. Nursing (not identified) noticed Resident 1 had fresh scratch marks to her left forearm. DON stated Resident 3 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Air mattress (designed to prevent pressure injury from occurring) used were set at the appropriate therapeutic setting for two of nine sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3). 2. Turning and repositioning was performed for two of nine sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3). These failures had the potential for worsening of pressure injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue that usually occur over a bony prominence as a result of usually long-term pressure, or pressure in combination with shear or friction) and/or development of new pressure injury. Findings: 1a. During an observation on 9/11/23 at 10:22 a.m. in Resident 2's room, Resident 2 was on air mattress with the setting set to approximately 287 pounds (lbs.). During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/11/23 at 10:52 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), in Resident 2's room, LVN 1 observed the setting on Resident 2's air mattress. LVN 1 stated Resident 2 weighed 165.8 lbs. as of 9/10/23. LVN 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure on General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 gave the wrong medication to the Family Member (FM) who took Resident 1 out on pass (temporary out of the facility). This failure resulted in Resident 1 taking her medication two hours late and had the potential for Resident 1 having adverse health outcomes. Findings: During an interview on 8/23/23 at 3 p.m. with FM, FM stated she took her Resident 1 out on pass. FM stated when she got home, she looked at the package of the medications given to her by LVN 1 and noticed that it (medication) was not Resident 1's medication. FM stated her mother did not take her due medication at 5 p.m. and (Resident 1) took her medications two hours late on that day (at 7 p.m., two hours later, on 8/12/23). During an interview on 8/24/23 at 1:15 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated Resident 1 was sent home with incorrect medication. DON stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Follow the physician's order to provide foot care and/or refer to Podiatry (the study, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders of the foot, and ankle) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had long, thick, and curled toenails. 2. Develop a plan of care for foot care for Resident 1. 3. Implement plan of care of skin assessment for Resident 1. These failures resulted in Resident 1 having skin breakdown on her toes and potential for skin infection and discomfort. Findings: 1. During an interview on 8/23/23 at 3 p.m. with Family Member (FM), FM stated her mother's (Resident 1) toenails were long and were not trimmed. FM stated she had reported it (long toenails) to Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 several times who stated she would tell her supervisor. During an interview on 8/24/23 at 10:30 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated since admission she had not had her toenails trimmed. Resident 1 stated her daughter (FM) has told the staff (CNA 1) to trim her toenails. Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision and assistance to one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 who required assistance with toilet use was left in the restroom. This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling and had the potential for injury. Findings: During an interview on 8/23/23 at 3 p.m. with Family Member (FM), FM stated her mother (Resident 1) had a fall in the facility in the restroom and hit her head. FM stated her mother (Resident 1) was not taken to the hospital and they (staff) just gave her Tylenol (medication for mild pain). During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/24/23 at 11:39 a.m. with Charge Nurse (CN), CN stated Resident 1 had a fall in the facility. Resident 1 ' s SBAR (Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation-change in condition report) dated 8/4/23 was reviewed. CN reviewed the SBAR. Resident 1's SBAR indicated, CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant 2) on orientation was passing out nourishment when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Pre-made food items were labeled with use-by-date and discarded when expired. 2. Perishable foods were labeled and dated. 3. Food brought in from outside the facility was dated. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (sickness resulting from contaminated food) to the residents residing in the facility. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/3/22, at 9:20 AM, with Dietary Aide (DA), in the walk-in refrigerator, the following was noted: Two small cups of pre-made mixed fruits labeled F on plastic wrap, dated 12/27. Four small cups of pre-made mixed fruits labeled F on plastic wrap, dated 12/28. Three small cups of pre-made mixed fruits labeled F on plastic wrap, dated 12/29. DA stated, the date on the mixed fruits indicated the date of preparation. The DA stated, the mixed fruit should have been discarded three days following the labeled date. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/3/22, at 9:40 AM, with DA, in the ice-cream freezer, two cups…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four medication carts was locked when left unattended by licensed nurse. This failure had the potential for residents and staff to have access to medications inside the medication cart with the potential to cause adverse outcomes. Findings: During an observation, on 1/5/22, at 11:30 AM, in the East Wing of the facility by the nurses station, the medication cart was observed unlocked and unattended by a licensed nurse. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 1/5/22, at 11:32 AM, with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 verified the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. RN 1 stated, Oh no, the med cart should always be locked at all times. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, General Dose Preparation and Medication Administration, dated 1/20/18, the P&P indicated, Facility should ensure that medication carts are always locked when out of sight or unattended.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident requested advance directive (AD-legal document for decisions about end-of-life care) was executed for one of 50 sampled residents (Resident 27). This failure had the potential for Resident 27's end-of-life decisions to not be honored. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's Advance Directive Acknowledgement (ADA) form, dated 8/16/19, the ADA indicated, I want to execute an Advance Directive. There was no executed AD found in Resident 27's clinical record. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 1/5/22, at 9:05 AM, with Social Services Director (SSD), SSD verified Resident 27 requested an AD to be executed and Resident 27 had been deemed to have capacity to make decisions for his care by his primary care provider. SSD was unable to locate an executed AD in Resident 27's clinical record. SSD stated the process for executing an AD is for the ombudsman (an official appointed to advocate for the residents in nursing homes) to be notified, a packet is sent to the facility from the ombudsman's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 50 sampled residents (Resident 49). This failure had the potential for unmet care needs. Findings: During an interview on 1/4/22, at 9:34 AM, with Resident 49, Resident 49 stated, he had diarrhea (loose stool) for more than one episode. Resident 49 stated diarrhea went on the floor when he got up to the bathroom. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 1/5/22, at 2:12 PM, with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 49's Order [physician] Details (OD), dated 7/29/21, were reviewed. The OD indicated, Senna (loosens stools and increases bowel movement, treats and prevents constipation) Tablet 8.6 MG (milligrams-unit of measure), give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for constipation hold if loose stool. DON verified the information. Resident 49's Bowel and Bladder Elimination (BBE) form, dated 12/7/21 through 1/5/22, was reviewed with DON. The BBE indicated Resident 49 had loose (stools)/diarrhea on: 12/8/21 at 11:53 PM. 12/10/21 at 1:05 PM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician's orders were followed for one of 50 sampled residents (Resident 49). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 49 to have diarrhea (loose stool). Findings: During an interview on 1/4/22, at 9:34 AM, with Resident 49, Resident 49 stated, he had diarrhea for more than one episode. Resident 49 stated diarrhea went on the floor when he got up to the bathroom. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 1/5/22, at 2:12 PM, with Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 49's Order [physician] Details (OD), dated 7/29/21, were reviewed. The OD indicated, Senna (loosens stools and increases bowel movement, treats and prevents constipation) Tablet 8.6 MG (milligrams-unit of measure), give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for constipation hold if loose stool. DON verified the information. Resident 49's Bowel and Bladder Elimination (BBE) form, dated 12/7/21 through 1/5/22, was reviewed with DON. The BBE indicated Resident 49 had loose (stools)/diarrhea on: 12/8/21 at 11:53 PM. 12/10/21 at 1:05 PM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control and prevention for two of 50 sampled residents (Resident 53 and Resident 6) when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE-items such as gowns, gloves, and masks used to prevent the spread of infection) while passing meal trays. 2. Housekeeper (HSK) did not wear appropriate PPE while cleaning resident room. 3. Charge Nurse/Treatment Nurse (CN/TN) did not follow infection control protocols while doing wound care treatment. Findings: 1. During an observation on 1/3/22, at 11:34 AM, in Resident 53's room, in the Yellow Zone (quarantined area of facility), CNA 2 entered room to set up Resident 53's lunch tray without wearing a gown. CNA 2 placed the lunch tray on the bedside table, placed a clothing protector (bib) on Resident 53, adjusted the foot pedals on Resident 53's wheelchair, and moved the wheelchair closer to the bedside table. During an interview on 1/3/22, at 12 PM, with CNA 2, CNA 2 stated, she does not wear a gown…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$17,966 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $9,318 — penalty dated 2024-05-29
- $8,648 — penalty dated 2024-01-03
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CALZO, JANICE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 11/02/2020 |
| GAVINA, ILEANA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/18/2022 |
| BARKER, BRADFORD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 02/27/2014 |
| CHAVEZ, RICARDO | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/16/2017 |
| FLORES, TRISHA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 12/28/2020 |
| LUGO, ROSA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 12/28/2020 |
| SOTO, SYLVIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 12/08/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555479. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.