Downey Community Health Center
8425 Iowa Street, Downey, CA 90241 · For profit - Partnership · 198 certified beds · (562) 862-6506 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 28.7% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.2% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.3% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 5.76 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.65 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 103 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 29.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 251 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.3%CMS range 30.8–45.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 7.0–12.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 29.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 28.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 5.3–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 198 beds and averages 172.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.83 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
71 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 61 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff was aware of what the facility used visual identifiers (icons placed by resident to identify special needs or accommodations) meant that were posted in resident rooms.This deficient practice had the potential to result in staff not providing the appropriate care for the residents.Findings:During a review of the facility's Lesson Plan titled Visual Identifier, undated, the Lesson Plan indicated the course content covered what visual identifiers were used in the facility. The visual identifier of a 5- fingers sign meant more than 2-persons assistance during transfer. The evaluation for the Lesson Plan included a question that asked the participants what the 5- fingers visual identifier meant in the facility.During an interview on 8/27/2025 at 10:10am with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2, CNA 2 was asked if she knew what the visual identifier with 5-fingers on a red hand posted up at the head of a resident's bed meant. CNA 2 stated she was not sure if she had ever seen that sign before and did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) by documenting Resident 1 received Restorative Nurse Aide (RNA- a Certified Nursing Assistant with specialized training in restorative care to help residents regain physical and cognitive functions and maintain independence) services when they did not. This deficient practice had the potential to affect future care provided to the resident due to inaccurate documentation practices.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to lack of calcium and Vitamin D) and rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic progressive disease-causing inflammation in the joints and resulting in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a two-person assist was used when using the Hoyer Lift (a mechanical device used to lift and/or transfer a person) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1 falling from the Hoyer Lift.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition where your brain's ability to function properly is impaired by a chemical imbalance in your body), vascular dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities caused by an impaired blood supply to the brain), and cerebral infarction (also known as a stroke, where a loss of blood flow to a part of the brain occurs). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 5/29/2025, the MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-10 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist Nurse (IPN) completed ten hours of continuing education in the field of Infection Prevention and Control on an annual basis. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the IPN being unaware and be unable to educate the facility's staff of updated information regarding Infection Prevention and Control. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/8/2025 at 10:18 a.m., with the IPN, the IPN's Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Court Certification, dated 11/14/2023, was reviewed. The IPN stated he completed his certification to become the facility's IPN on 11/14/2023 but did not complete any documented continuing education in the filed of Infection Prevention and Control since then. The IPN stated he was responsible for completing at least ten hours of continuing education in Infection Control on an annual basis to keep up to date with all guidelines and protocols. The IIPN stated without the completion of continuing education, he may not be educating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-10 · tag F0943 — widespreadGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the training provided to all facility staff, specifically related to abuse reporting, was consistent with federal reporting guidelines. This failure had the potential to affect all facility residents due to late reporting of abuse, and delayed investigations by the State Agency. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 4/10/2025 at 11:27 a.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the facility's lesson plan titled Abuse Definition, Prevention, Reporting, and Investigation, dated 3/30/2025 to 4/6/2025, was reviewed. The DSD stated the lesson plan indicated allegations of abuse were to be reported to the State Agency within 24 hours, unless the allegation involved injury. The DSD stated he was not sure what the federal requirements were for reporting abuse. The DSD stated this lesson plan was approved by the Director of Nursing (DON) prior to being taught to facility staff. The DSD stated timely reporting of allegations of abuse was to ensure the safety of the facility's residents, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Kitchen staff wore a hair covering in the food service or preparation areas of the kitchen. 2. All food items in the storeroom were labeled and dated. These deficient practices had the potential to result in improper food safety practice and could lead to food contamination, and possible food borne illness in residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/7/2025 at 8:35 a.m., in the kitchen, with Dishwasher 1, observed Dishwasher 1 without the required hair covering while working in the dishwashing area, near the food preparation station. Dishwasher 1 stated he did not realize that his hair netting had fallen, and he believed his hair was still covered. During an interview on 4/7/2025 at 8:45 a.m., in the kitchen, with Dietary Supervisor (DS 1), DS 1 stated a hair covering not properly secured could result in hair falling into the food, clean dishes, or food preparation area, and increased risk of food contamination. 2. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-10 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 142) fully understood the Arbitration Agreement (an agreement between the facility and the resident where they would resolve any disputes through a neutral person rather than going to court) in a language Resident 142 understood. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 142 not fully understanding what entering a binding Arbitration Agreement meant. Findings: During a review of Resident 142's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 142 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that caused a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). The admission Record indicated Resident 142's primary language was Spanish. During a review of Resident 142's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 2/17/2025, the MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 100). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in meeting the residents' needs for assistance and could lead to falls and accidents. Findings: During an observation on 4/8/2025 at 8:46 a.m., in Resident 100's room, Resident 100 was awake and lying on her bed. The call light cord was observed hanging around the left-upper side rail with the touch pad touching the floor. During an observation on 4/8/2025 at 2:10 p.m., in Resident 100's room, Resident 100 was awake and lying on her bed. The call light touch pad was touching the floor. During a review of Resident 100's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 100 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness, dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and history of falling.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the physician and the resident's representative (RR 1) of a change in condition (COC) of skin tears (separation of the skin) and bleeding on both forearms for one of four sampled residents (Resident 89). This deficient practice resulted in a delay in medical assessment and treatment for Resident 89 and placed the resident at risk of harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 89's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), cerebrovascular accident ([CVA]- stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), major depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), diabetes mellitus ([DM]- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and hypertension ([HTN]- high blood pressure). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident physical abuse to the State Agency within two (2) hours, for two of four sampled residents (Resident 44 and Resident 42). This failure resulted in delayed notification to the State Agency and increased the potential for additional resident-to-resident abuse incidents to occur. Cross reference F-tag F943. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 44 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 44's admitting diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), paranoid schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), and psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality). During a review of Resident 44's History and Physical (H&P), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 61 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents' (Resident 129) assessment entry on the Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a resident assessment tool) was accurate and included the depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) diagnosis. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 129's plan of care and delivery of necessary care and services related to depression. Findings: During a review of Resident 129's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 129 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included psychosis (a state where a person loses touch with reality by experiencing things that are not real), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought). During a review of Resident 129's MDS, dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan (a document that outlines a resident's care needs, diagnosis, and treatment goals) for Pregabalin (medication to treat nerve pain by calming overactive nerves in the body was developed and implemented for one of four sampled residents (Resident 479). This deficient practice placed Resident 479 at risk for delayed monitoring and implementing interventions. Findings: During a review of Resident 479's admission Record [(Face Sheet) front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident], the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 479 on 3/25/2025, with diagnoses including arthritis (a condition that causes inflammation and pain in the joints), muscle weakness (a reduced ability to contract or exert force with muscle), polyneuropathy (the simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body) and acute pulmonary edema (a medical emergency characterized by a rapid buildup of fluid in the lungs, making it difficult to breath). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the person-centered care plan (document that helps nurses and other team care members organize aspect of resident care) for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 328) who was on dual (two) antiplatelet medication (medication to prevent blood clots from forming). This deficient practice had the potential to result in confusion between licensed nurses regarding Resident 328's appropriate use of dual antiplatelet medication and navigation of Resident 328's plan of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 328's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 328 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) affecting the right dominant side following a cerebral infarct (also known as stroke, a loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) and nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two of four sampled residents (Residents 112, and 75) by failing to keep the residents' fingernails clean and neat. This failure had the potential to result in negative impact on Residents 112 and 75's quality of life and self-esteem, and had the potential for development of infection. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/7/2025 at 9:47 a.m., with Resident 112, in Resident 112's room, observed Resident 112's fingernails long with black substance underneath. Resident 112 stated her fingernails looked long and that she would like to have her fingernails cut and cleaned. During a review of Resident 112's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus ([DM]- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate and complete documentation on the Controlled Record for two of two sampled residents (Residents 155 and 178). This deficient practice resulted in the inaccurate count of medications left in the medications bubble packs (a card used to store medications for the resident) and had the potential to result in an additional dose administered, for drug diversion (the act of health care providers stealing prescription medicine for their own use), and/or the potential for medication error to occur. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 178's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 178 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included radiculopathy (also known as pinched nerve where the nerve root in the spine is compressed or irritated), cervicalgia (neck pain), and low back pain. During a review of Resident 178's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/9/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 178…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor Resident 479 for signs of being over medicated while on Pregabalin (medication to treat nerve pain by calming overactive nerves in the body) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 479). This deficient practice placed Resident 479 at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings: During an observation on 4/7/2025 at 10:21 a.m. in Resident 479's room, Resident 479 was observed lying in bed with eyes closed. During an observation on 4/7/2025 at 11:53 a.m., in Resident 479's room, Resident 479 was observed lying in bed with eyes closed. During an observation on 4/9/2025 at 10:00 a.m., in Resident 479's room, Resident 479 was observed lying in bed with eyes closed. During an observation on 4/10/2025 at 11:18 a.m. in Resident 479's room, Resident 479 was observed lying in bed with eyes closed. During a review of Resident 479's admission Record [(Face Sheet) front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident], the admission Record indicated the facility admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled resident (Resident 230) was free from significant medication error (one which causes the resident discomfort or jeopardizes his or her health and safety) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 230 received glipizide (lowers blood sugar) 30 minutes before breakfast. 2. Ensure licensed nurses followed the physician's orders. These deficient practices placed Resident 230 at a higher risk to experience extremely lower blood sugar levels. Findings: During a review of Resident 230's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 230 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus ([DM] a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and long-term use of insulin (a hormone that helps regulate blood sugar levels). During a review of Resident 230's History and Physical (H&P) dated 4/3/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 230 had the capacity to understand and make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove outside food from the bedside after two hours for one out of seven residents (Resident 79) in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Foods brought by family or visitors. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses (food poisoning) for Resident 79, with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever. It could lead to other serious medical complications (a medical problem that occurred during a disease) and hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 79's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 79 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by imbalances in the body's chemistry, like electrolyte or blood chemical problems, due to other health issues) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD, a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical records were maintained in accordance with accepted professional standards and accurately complete the Advance Directives Acknowledgement ([ADA]- a form gives you the right to give instructions about your own health care) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 132). This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate and incomplete medical records and had the potential to result in confusion in the resident's care and services. This also placed Resident 132 at risk of not receiving necessary care or not receiving care based on the resident's wishes due to inaccurate and incomplete information. Findings: During a review of Resident 132's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 132 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), gastrostomy (a surgical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a touch pad (button activated by light touch) call light for one out of eight residents (Resident 86). This deficient practice had the potential to cause a delay or an inability in Resident 86 obtaining necessary care and services. Findings: During an observation on 4/9/2025 at 2:19 p.m., in Resident 86's room, the call light was observed near Resident 86's left hand. Resident 86 unsuccessfully attempted to press the call light button. During a review of Resident 86's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 86 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of left body hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness) of the right dominant side. During a review of Resident 86's History and Physical (H&P) dated 11/30/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 86 did not have the capacity to understand and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) did not continue to have access to one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) after an allegation of physical abuse. This deficient practice resulted in CNA 1 still being assigned to the care of Resident 1 ' s roommates after Resident 1 ' s allegation of abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included low back pain, muscle weakness (when muscles did not have the strength they normally do), and diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a resident assessment tool), dated 1/8/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 ' s cognition (process of thinking) was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required supervision with eating; partial assistance (helper did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to document records completely for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Resident 1 had concerns with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 during care on 3/15/2025. 2. The facility failed to document a change of condition when Resident 1 had an allegation of abuse on 3/17/2025. These deficient practices had the potential to result in a lack of or a delay in communication between the staff and could interrupt provision of care/intervention to Resident 1. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included low back pain, muscle weakness (when muscles did not have the strength they normally do), and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 1/8/2025, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for one of the 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to ensure the physician order to check Resident 1 ' s blood sugar (BS) levels were implemented on 2/28/2025, 3/1/2025 and 3/2/2025. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) and/or hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) episodes, and potential for complications and hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis including diabetes (DM-high blood sugar), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure) and anxiety disorder (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 2/24/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the mental capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a review of residents 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS – a federally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was readmitted to the facility after Resident 1 was transferred and treated at the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 remaining at the GACH for two additional days after Resident 1 was deemed appropriate for discharge back to the facility but was denied readmission by the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of right hemiplegia (a condition caused by a brain injury, that results in a varying degree of weakness, stiffness, and lack of control in one side of the body) and chronic kidney (disease gradual loss of kidney function. Kidneys are unable to filter wastes and excess fluids from blood). A review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/26/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its infection prevention and control measures by failing to ensure clear signage was posted for two of five sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 5) who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions ([EBP] use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms ([MDROs] bacteria or other microorganism resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics)). This deficient practice had the potential to result in staff and visitors entering the room without the proper personal protective equipment ([PPE] specialized clothing or equipment such as gloves and gown, worn to minimize exposure to serious illness) and increasing the risk of transmitting disease-causing organisms leading to illness. Findings: During a review of Resident 4 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan intervention of bilateral floor mats. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 3 being injured if she fell. Findings: During an observation on 4/24/2024 at 9:16 a.m. in Resident 3's room, there was no fall mat on the right side of the bed. The fall mat on the left side of the bed was closest to the roommate's bed. During an interview on 4/24/2024 at 12:00 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN1), RN1 stated fall mats are placed to minimize injury by providing a cushion. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/24/2024 at 12:16 pm with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN1), LVN1 showed RES3 had a doctor's order for fall mats on both sides of the bed while in bed. LVN1 states the fall mats were ordered to catch the resident if she slides off the bed. If the resident falls without the mat in place she can hit her head and need to go to the hospital. During a review of Resident 3's change of condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not implement infection practices as outlined in the facility's infection control program when the facility did not perform the following: 1. Implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions ([EBP]-the use of gown and gloves for specific care activities that involve a high chance of the spread of infection), as mandated, to limit the spread of infections. 2. Ensure the Treatment Nurse wore proper personal protective equipment ([PPE] -a barrier precaution which includes use of gloves, gown, mask, face shield, shoe covers, head covers, respirators, etc. when you anticipate contact with blood or body fluids or other communicable toxins or agents) during Resident 88's wound treatment. 3. Ensure certified staff used PPE when providing wound treatment for Resident 129. 4. Follow their own policy and procedures (P&Ps) titled, Hand Washing/Hand Hygiene, dated 1/2023, to ensure licensed nurses wash or sanitized hands before and after taking the blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure medications brought from home (Home Medications) were reviewed by the pharmacist for two of two residents (Resident 65 and Resident 113) prior to administering Home Medications stored inside of two of four medication carts inspected (Medication Cart 2 located on Station 3 and Medication Cart 3 on Station 1) respectively. 2. Accurately account for and document the administration of eight out of 12 doses of Lorazepam, a controlled medication (has a high potential for abuse) affecting Resident 36 on Station 2, Medication Cart 2. These deficient practices increased the risk for unsafe medication administration, potential for diversion, medication errors due to lack of documentation, possibly resulting in serious health complications that could lead to hospitalization or death. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 65's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure lorazepam (a medication used to treat mental illness) was used for a medical condition as diagnosed and documented in the resident's clinical record between 3/25/2024 and 4/2/2024, for one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident 36). 2. Define resident-specific target behaviors regarding the use of lorazepam for one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident 36). 3. Monitor lorazepam for adverse effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) and effectiveness between 3/35/2025 and 4/2/2024, for one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident 36). 4. Quantify episodes of constant fidgeting, per the physician's order related to the use of lorazepam (a medication used to treat anxiety, excessive worry and feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness) between 3/21/2024 and 4/2/2024, for one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5 percent (%) during medication pass for four of five sampled residents (Residents 10, Resident 16, Resident 53, and Resident 621) observed during medication administration by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 621's physician orders for hydroxychloroquine and potassium chloride extended release (ER) were administered in accordance with manufacturer's specification, the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Medication Administration-General Guidelines, dated 5/2016, and/or the form titled, Medications Not To Be Crushed, list dated 7/2015 (Cross Ref F-tag F760). 2. Ensure Resident 621's physician order for aspirin was administered as prescribed on 4/2/2024. 3. Ensure Resident 10 was administered Metformin (a medication used to treat diabetes, a chronic [long-term] condition, in which a high level of glucose [sugar] is present in the bloodstream), within 60 minutes of the scheduled time as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food by methods that conserved texture and appearance for 23 of 23 residents receiving a pureed diet (a regular diet that has been designed for residents who have difficulty chewing and or swallowing). The texture of the pureed diet was lumpy and not smooth with large pieces of pasta present requiring chewing before swallowing. This deficient practice had the potential to result in meal dissatisfaction, decreased food intake, risk for unplanned weight loss, and placed al 23 residents receiving a pureed diet at risk for choking. Findings: During an initial facility tour on 4/1/2024 at 8:30 AM, complaints about the flavor of the food was identified. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/2/2024 at 11:30 AM, with [NAME] 1, in the kitchen, [NAME] 1 was observed taking the temperatures of the lunch meal items on the steam table. [NAME] 1 stated the lunch on 4/2/2024 included lasagna, Italian green beans, and garlic bread. [NAME] 1 stated a portion of the regular lasagna was taken and pureed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and preparation practices in the kitchen when: 1. Six plastic bags of packed lunch with meat sandwiches for residents were stored in the refrigerator with use by dates of 3/27/2024, 3/30/2024, and 3/31/2024, exceeding the storage period for previously prepared sandwiches. There was one medium size container of tomato sauce with a use by date of 3/26/2024, and one medium size container of cooked green beans with a use by date of 3/28/2024, stored in the walk-in refrigerator exceeding use by date mark. There were four ham and cheese sandwiches stored in walk in refrigerator with no date. One container of a liquid egg carton with an open date of 3/27/2024 and manufactures instruction to use within 3 days stored in the walk-in refrigerator exceeding manufactures use by date. One large bowl of previously prepared whipped cream stored in the walk-in refrigerator uncovered and open to the refrigerator environment. Ready to eat deli meats including ham and roasted turkey were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep a resident informed and did not ensure a resident exercised his right to choose for one out of eight sampled residents (Resident 74) by failing to: 1. Ensure licensed nursing staff informed Resident 74 of the medications being administered prior to administration. 2. Ensure Resident 74 was given an opportunity to participate during medication administration. These deficient practices violated Resident 74's rights. Findings: During a review of Resident 74's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 74 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF, a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood adequately) and chronic kidney disease (CKD, a gradual loss of kidney function). During a review of Resident 74's History and Physical (H&P) dated 2/10/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 74 had fluctuating capacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respect and dignity was provided for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 134) by not ensuring Resident 134 was served meals with disposable plastic utensils and not informing Resident 134 of the reason she received the disposable plastic utensils. This deficient practice violated Resident 134's right to be treated with respect and dignity and had the potential to negatively impact Resident 134's psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 134's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 134 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fibromyalgia (a chronic disorder characterized by widespread pain and other symptoms such as fatigue and muscle stiffness) and depression (a common and serious medical illness that negatively affects how a person feels, the way they think and act, causes feelings of sadness and/or a loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respect a residents' right to personal privacy for one out of eight sampled residents (Resident 90) by failing to ensure the facility's case manager did not open Resident 90's mail. This deficient practice violated Resident 90's right to privacy and had the potential to cause psychosocial harm to Resident 90. Findings: During a review of Resident 90's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 90 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, group of chronic lung diseases that block airflow and make it harder to breathe air out of the lungs) and congestive heart failure (CHF, a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). During a review of Resident 90's History and Physical (H&P) dated 3/6/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 90 did the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement an individualized person-centered care plan (document helps nurses and other team care members organize aspect of resident care) with measurable objectives, timeframes, and interventions to meet the residents' needs addressing one out of eight sampled residents (Resident 134) suicidal ideations (Intrusive thoughts and a preoccupation with death and dying). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 134. Findings: During a review of Resident 134's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 134 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fibromyalgia (a chronic disorder characterized by widespread pain and other symptoms such as fatigue and muscle stiffness) and depression (a common and serious medical illness that negatively affects how a person feels, the way they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain appropriate grooming and personal hygiene for two of 12 sampled residents (Residents 88 and 222) by failing to keep the residents' nails clean and neat. This failure had the potential to result in negative impact on the residents' quality of life and self-esteem and had the potential for development of infection. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 88's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 88 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to cellulitis of the left lower limb (skin infection that spreads rapidly), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood), and cerebral infarction (also known as a stroke; refers to damage to the tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area). During a review of Resident 88's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and identify the potential hazard and resident's risk factors for falls for one of three sampled residents (Resident 36), by failing to complete a Post-Fall Assessment and conduct an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of healthcare professionals with various areas of expertise who work together towards the goals of the residents) meeting after Resident 36 had an unwitnessed fall. This failure had the potential for Resident 36's cause of fall to be undetermined and increased the potential for reoccurrence of future falls and injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 36 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to cerebral infarction (also known as a stroke, refers to damage to the tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area), metabolic encephalopathy (problem in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 621) were free from significant medication errors when Resident 621 received Potassium Chloride ER ([ER- Extended Release] a medication used to prevent or treat low potassium levels in the body) crushed and administered as a mixture with other medications, which was not in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications, and the facility's Policy & Procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines, dated 5/2016 and/or as indicated on the form titled, Medications Not To Be Crushed, list dated 7/2015. These failures resulted in Resident 621 receiving non-crushable Potassium Chloride ER with other medications as crushed and administered as a mixture with the potential to result in drug incompatibilities, adverse reactions leading to changes in potassium levels, irritation, or ulceration to the gastrointestinal ([GI] organ system in human body that includes mouth, throat, esophagus,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure tortillas served during lunch time were served in accordance with a physician order for mechanical soft diet (a type of texture-modified diet for people who have difficulty chewing and swallowing) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 81). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 81 being unable to properly chew the tortilla that could result in Resident 81 choking. Findings: During a review of Resident 81's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 81 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (problem in the brain caused by chemical imbalances in the blood), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition that results in too much sugar circulating in the blood), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease characterized by long-term poor airflow). During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the need for modifications to the call light system for one out of eight sampled residents (Resident 124), who had difficulty activating the call light. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in obtaining necessary care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 124's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 124 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe) and blindness to one eye. During a review of Resident 124's History and Physical (H&P) dated 3/1/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 124 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 124's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 3/13/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 124's cognitive (mental action or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) were free from avoidable falls. As a result, this failure had the potential to cause a fracture (a complete or partial break of a bone) or head injury for Resident 2 and Resident 3. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, dated 2/5/2024, the admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an admitting diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma (chronic, progressive, and irreversible optic nerve damage with loss of peripheral and central visual field loss which leads to blindness) of both eyes, muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle mass), abnormalities of gait and mobility (does not walk or move normally), and generalized muscle weakness. The admission record further indicated Resident 2 had a history of falling, and a history of a traumatic fracture. During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and 4) who had a physicians' orders to receive two liters of oxygen (O2) by a nasal cannula ([NC] a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen) instead of three liters of O2, per minute. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1 and r 4 receiving more oxygen than required amount of oxygen which can negatively impact their health. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including coronal virus ([COVID-19] a respiratory infection that causes difficulty breathing), allergic rhinitis (a disorder caused by allergy-causing substance, such as pollen, dust, and pet hair) and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's history and physical (H&P) dated 7/24/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) clinical record was maintained in accordance with accepted professional standard and practice, by not documenting activities of daily living (ADL) sheet correctly by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) This deficient practice can result in a lack of or a delay in communication between the staff and can interrupt provision of care/intervention to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included muscle weakness (full effort doesn't produce a normal muscle contraction or movement), other intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region (is defined as the wear and tear of lumbar intervertebral disc), and other symptoms and signs involving the musculoskeletal system(different musculoskeletal disorders, such as autoimmune disorders) During a review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-01 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a copy of medical records in a timely manner upon request from an authorized representative for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice violated the rights of Resident 1's representative to obtain copy of the resident ' s medical records. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included dementia (confusion or mild cognitive [though process] impairment), muscle weakness (commonly due to lack of exercise, aging, muscle injury), and hypertension ([HTN], high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P) dated 6/12/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had fluctuating capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized care assessment and care screening tool), dated 6/13/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-03-01 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — widespreadProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Staff had active/current Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) cards (a credential to perform a medical procedure by repeated chest compressions, to restore blood circulation, heart function and breathing of a person who has suffered a life-threatening emergency) on file. This deficient practice had the potential of delayed provision of emergency care for 184 residents residing in the facility and for current 124 residents whose wishes were to have full treatment in a life-threatening situation. Findings: During an interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) on [DATE] at 8:04 a.m., the DSD stated that he was responsible for hiring, scheduling, training, and making sure all the staff in the facility can fulfil their duties by reminding staff of their annual physical checkups, tuberculosis (TB) test, skills competency, license or certificate renewals including CPR cards that expire every two years. During a concurrent interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses' records of Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ([CPR] a medical procedure involving repeated compression of a patient's chest, performed in an attempt to restore the blood circulation, and breathing of a person who has suffered cardiac arrest.) certification and skill sets necessary to care for residents in the facility were current or active. This deficient practice had the potential for 126 residents out of 184 residents in the facility whose wishes to have a full code (full support which includes cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) status, if the patient has no heartbeat and/or is not breathing) during a life-threatening situation, not to get quality CPR. Findings: During an interview on [DATE] at 8:22 a.m. with the Director Staff Developer (DSD), DSD stated he was responsible for hiring employees, education of staff on policies and monitoring their performance, skills, and records; need to perform their job well. DSD stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-03-01 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Dietary Aide (DA) 1 covered an open wound on the right wrist while working in the kitchen. This failure had the potential to result in transmitting possible infectious diseases to a resident population of 176 residents who were served food. 2. Ensure DA 1 was competent with testing the concentration of the sanitizer to ensure it was effective in sanitizing food contact surfaces. This failure had the potential to result in ineffectively sanitizing the food contact surfaces and dishes. Ineffective sanitizing of food contact surfaces and counters had the potential to result in food borne illness in a resident population of 176 residents who were served food. Findings: a. During a kitchen observation on 2/24/2022 at 9:30 a.m., DA 1 was observed washing dishes wearing gloves but noted to have an open wound on the right wrist, measuring approximately three (3) centimeter [(cm) unit of measurement) in length and 3cm in width, wound bed with 30 % (percentage) epithelialization (light pink with a shiny…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage practices in the kitchen when: 1a. Foods were placed directly on the floor. 1b. Foods were not labeled with opened-on dates, nor received-on dates and food was left opened and uncovered in the storage bin. 1c. Foods were stored in bins, the refrigerator, and freezer without removing them from original packaging. Failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation practices when: 2a. Dietary staff did not check all the food temperatures prior to service of the meal. 2b. [NAME] 1 and Dietary Aide (DA) 2 did not wash their hands after changing their gloves during tray line and food handling. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to food borne illness for 176 of 184 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1a. During a concurrent kitchen observation and interview with the Dietary Staff Supervisor (DSS) on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-03-01 · tag F0888 — widespreadEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: a. Actual copies of staff COVID-19 (a highly contagious infection) vaccination (treatment with a vaccine [medication that provides protection against disease]) cards were kept on file. b. Their COVID-19 vaccine policy addressed a process by which staff may request an exemption (medical or religious or clinical contraindications from the vaccine) from vaccination requirements (required documentation for staff who request exemption). This deficiency had the potential to increase the risk of spreading COVID-19 to residents in the facility. Findings: a. During a concurrent interview with the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP) and record review of the facility staff vaccination list on 2/24/2022 at 9:19 a.m., IP confirmed that the data on the vaccination list were from visual confirmations of the staff's COVID vaccination status. IP stated the facility did not keep copies of all of staffs' COVID vaccination records. During the continued interview with the IP and record review of Office Staff (Office 1) and Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly address 6 of 10 sampled residents' (Resident 100, 392, 388, 383, 95 and 67) wishes regarding end-of-life care (support and medical care given during the time surrounding residents death) as evidenced by: a. The facility failed to ensure Resident 95's advanced directives (legal documents that allow you to spell out your decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time) were in the physical chart. b. The facility failed to update Resident 100, 392, 388, 383's medical records to show documentation that advance directives were discussed and written information was provided to the residents and/or responsible parties. c. The facility failed to ensure Resident 67's Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment ([POLST] written medical order from a licensed practitioner that gives residents with serious illnesses more control over their own care by specifying the types of medical treatment they want to receive during serious illness) was provided to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the failed to provide services that met professional standards for four sampled residents (173, 59, 142, and 11) by ensuring: a. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 failed to perform weekly skin assessments and follow-up with the physician regarding a wound for one of six sampled residents (Resident 173). b. Nursing staff failed to implement the physician's written orders to monitor orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure) for three of five residents sampled (Residents 59, 142, and 11). These deficient practices resulted in the resident's physician not being informed of Resident 173's wound status, which could potentially lead to delay in care and decreased wound healing, and the potential to place Residents 142, 11, and 59 at risk of falls leading to injury. a. A review of Resident 173's admission Record (Face sheet), dated 2/25/22, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 173's diagnoses included heart failure (condition in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 8 of 37 sampled residents (Residents 100, 386, 387, 139, 12, 388, 380, and 387) were provided care and services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene by failing to: a. Ensure Residents 100, 386, and 387 nails were clean and neat. b. Ensure Residents 12, 139, 388, 380, and 387 were provided their scheduled showers. These deficient practices had the potential to result in a negative impact on the residents' quality of life and self-esteem. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 100's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 100's diagnoses included sepsis (a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused in response to infection), urinary tract infection ([UTI] bacteria that infects any part of your urinary system which can include kidneys, ureters, bladder and urethra), type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment was free from potential accidental hazards by not maintaining and repairing the laminated wood flooring in Station 1. This deficient practice had the potential to cause injury for 184 residents, staff and visitors when ambulating (walking), or when utilizing wheelchairs, walkers, shower chair or gurneys for mobility. Findings: During an initial tour of the facility on 2/22/2022 at 10:00 a.m., the hallway floor at Station 1 was observed to have laminated wood flooring. Three laminated wood floor planks in between Rooms 101 to 107 was noted to have damaged edges, which were chipped, flaking and peeling creating an uneven, rough floor. During an observation on 2/25/2022 at 8:00 a.m., noted at least one plank of laminated wood floor at the hallway near the entryway to room [ROOM NUMBER] to have raised corners approximately an eighth of an inch high creating sharp edges and an uneven floor. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-01 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Follow physician orders for one of eight residents (Resident 156) with an indwelling urinary catheter (used to drain urine from your bladder into a bag outside the body). 2. Ensure physician orders were received for one of one residents (Resident 156) using oxygen. These deficient practices had the potential for health complications associated with lack of guidance from the physician, delay in assessment, delay of necessary services and treatment, poor continuity of care and follow-up on the resident's status. Findings: a. A review of Resident 156's admission Records indicated Resident 156 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 156's diagnoses included urinary tract infection ([UTI] an infection in any part of urinary system [kidneys, ureters, bladder and urethra]), diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), major depressive disorder (persistent and intense feelings of sadness for extended periods), pneumonia (an infection of one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-01 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — patternEnsure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff received and demonstrated competency skills checks related to caring for the facility residents diagnosed with dementia (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment). This deficient practice had the potential for staff not providing quality care tailored to dementia residents, due to lack of knowledge. Findings: During an interview on 2/25/2022 at 8:22 a.m., with the Director Staff Developer (DSD), DSD stated he was responsible for the education of staff on policies, and monitoring the performance skills and records, so staff can perform their jobs well. DSD further stated that he did the dementia training upon hire and yearly thereafter, DSD said that the schedule for training is usually quarterly (every three months) to meet the staff training/education requirements. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/25/2022 at 8:30 a.m. with the DSD, DSD stated that Certified Nurse Assistant 2's (CNA 2's) personnel file did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain adequate water pressure for six of 32 sampled residents (Residents 11, 20, 60, 61, 88, and 131). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate hand washing and increase the risk of spreading bacteria and infections due to the low water pressure. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/23/2022 at 3:40 p.m. with Maintenance Supervisor (MS), in Resident 60, 88, and Resident 131's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) and Resident 11, 20, and Resident 61's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) the sink water had a low-pressure flow for both hot and cold water in room [ROOM NUMBER] and low-pressure flow for cold water in room [ROOM NUMBER]. MS stated, The water pressure is not right, and it is not supposed to be this way, somebody must have messed with it and shut the water off, I don't know, I will go fix it right now. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure four of seven sampled residents (Residents 90, 101,105, and 156) were treated with respect to promote dignity by failing to serve Residents 101 and 105 meals at the same time as their roommates. This deficient practice had the potential to cause psychosocial harm or decline to the residents, and violated the residents' right to be treated with dignity. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 101's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 101's diagnoses included hemiplegia (severe weakness on one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and contractures (shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) on both ankles, knees, and hands. During a review of Resident 101's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized assessment and care planning tool)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations for resident needs and preferences for thirteen (13) of twenty-two (22) sampled residents (Residents 55, 62, 70, 65, 77, 167, 378, 12, 137, 139, 388, 380, and 387) by failing to: 1. Ensure Residents 55, 62, 70, 65, 77, 167, and 378 have their call lights within reach. 2. Ensure Residents 12, 137, 139, 388, 380, and 387 were provided their scheduled showers. These deficient practices had the potential to result in delayed provision of quality care and negatively impact the psychosocial well-being of residents. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 55's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including post COVID-19 (previous infection of Coronavirus), cough (expel air from the lungs with a sudden sharp sound), and fatigue (extreme tiredness due to mental or physical effort or illness). During a review of Resident 55's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-01 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment (a detailed assessment and care planning process due to or after a significant change in health status assessment [SCSA] for the minimum data set ([MDS] standardized assessment and care screening tool) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 637). This deficient practice had the potential to result in any new concerns or needs in Resident 637's health status not being addressed or monitored. Findings: During a record review of Resident 637's admission Record (face sheet) printed 2/11/2022, the face sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 637 on 7/27/2021. Resident 637's diagnoses included COVID-19 (a highly contagious infection), pneumonia (infection of the lungs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] lung problem making it difficult to breath), gastroesophageal reflux disease (stomach acid goes back into the tube that connects the stomach to the mouth), paranoid schizophrenia (a mental disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: a. Resident 67 assessment was reviewed, updated, and changed to reflect the significant change identified by Interdisciplinary team ([IDT] a group of experts from several different fields working together towards a common goal for a resident) conducted. b. Resident 101's Braden assessment (an assessment tool for predicting the risk of pressure ulcer [injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin, that often develop on skin that covers bony areas of the body, such as the heels, ankles, hips and tailbone] based on the total scores given in the categories sensory perception, moisture, activity, mobility, nutrition, and friction and shear) and pain assessment was updated and reviewed after a change of condition. c. Resident 173's weekly wound assessment was completed to monitor progress of the wound. These deficient practices had the potential to result in delay in the necessary medical care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized person-centered plan of care with measurable objectives, timeframe, and interventions to meet the residents' needs for two of six sampled residents (Residents 36 and 149) by failing to: 1. Develop an individualized/person-centered care plan with goals and interventions to address Resident 36's use of side rails (barrier attached to the side of a bed). 2. Develop an individualized/person-centered care plan with goals and interventions to address Resident 149's risk for elopement (resident aware that he/she is not permitted to leave but does so with intent) tendencies. These deficient practices had the potential to result in a delay of nursing care, interventions, and services for Resident 36 and 149. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 36's admission Record information, the admission record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included acute gastritis (inflammation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update one of two sampled resident's (Resident 637) care plans after a significant change in status assessment (SCSA) for the minimum data set ([MDS] standardized assessment and care screening tool) was completed on 2/4/2022. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a poor execution of relevant nursing care plans for Resident 637 that could decrease the resident's physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a record review of the Resident 637's admission record (face sheet) printed 2/11/2022, the face sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 637 on 7/27/2021. Resident 637's diagnoses included COVID-19 (highly contagious infection), pneumonia (infection of the lungs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung problem making it difficult to breath), gastroesophageal reflux disease (stomach acid goes back into the tube that connects the stomach to the mouth), paranoid schizophrenia (a mental disorder causing the resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the failed to provide services that met professional standards of care for four of four sampled residents (173, 59, 142, and 11) when: a. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 3) failed to perform the weekly skin assessments and follow-up with physician regarding wound for one out six sampled residents (Resident 173). b. Nursing staff failed to implement the physician's written orders to monitor orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure [low blood pressure is when the heart is unable to pump enough blood] when you stand up from a sitting or lying position) for three of four sampled residents (Residents 59, 142, and 11). These deficient practices resulted in the physician not being aware of Resident 173's wound status, which could potentially lead to delay in care and decreased wound healing and the potential to place Residents 142, 11, and 59 at risk of falling and leading to injury. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 173's admission record, dated 2/25/2022, the record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was evaluated by the facility's Registered Dietician (RD) timely to manage a facility acquired pressure ulcer (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) for one of 2 sampled residents (Resident 101). This deficient practice had the potential to delay provision of necessary care and services that could help in wound healing or prevent the pressure ulcer from getting worse. Findings: During a review of Resident 101's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 101 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis [inability to move] on one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and contracture on both ankles, knees, and hands. A review of Resident 101's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a resident assessment and care-screening tool, dated 08/25/2021, indicated Resident 101's cognition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-01 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one residents (Resident 479) was positioned correctly for enteral feeding ([tube feeding] a way of delivering nutrition directly to the stomach through a plastic tube) when Resident 479's head was not elevated at least 30 degrees while the tube feeding was running. The deficiency had the potential to result in Resident 479's aspiration (when food, saliva, liquids, or vomit is breathed into airways leading to the lungs instead of going into the stomach) that can lead to pneumonia (infection of the lungs) or even death. Findings: During a review of Resident 479's discharge summary from the acute care facility, dated 2/21/2022, the discharge summary indicated Resident 479's diagnoses included respiratory failure (serious condition in which blood does not have enough oxygen), recent COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory infection) pneumonia, dementia (loss of cognitive function-- thinking, remembering, and reasoning-- to such extent that interferes with daily life), dysphagia (difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-01 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain an order for the use of oxygen therapy in accordance with professional standards for one of one sampled resident (Resident 156). This deficient practice had the potential for health complications associated with lack of guidance from the physician, delay in assessment, treatment plan and poor continuity of care and follow-up on the resident's status. Findings: A review of Resident 156's admission Records indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 156's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), major depressive disorder (persistent and intense feelings of sadness for extended periods), pneumonia (an infection of one or both of the lungs caused by bacteria, viruses, or fungi), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), and asthma (a respiratory condition marked by spasms in the bronchi of the lungs,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications brought into the facility from home, were accounted for and stored for safekeeping for one of one resident (Resident 478). These deficient practices placed Resident 478 at risk to receive medication that had not been reviewed by the physician, verified and accounted for due to improper storage, possibly leading to health complications resulting in hospitalization or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 478's admission Record (face sheet), the face sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 478's diagnoses included diabetes type 2 (abnormal blood sugar), hypertension ([HTN] condition present when blood flows through the blood vessels with a force greater than normal), hyperlipemia ([HLD] a condition that causes the levels of certain bad fats, or lipids, to be too high in the blood), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hemiplegia (total or partial paralysis [inability to move] of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a face shield (personal protective equipment used for protection of the eyes, nose, mouth from splashes, sprays, and spatter of body fluids) was discarded appropriately. This deficient practice had the potential to place staff and residents at risk for cross-contamination. Findings: During an observation on 2/24/22 at 11:37 a.m., one face shield was observed on top of the desk at Nursing Station 1 unattended. During an interview on 2/24/22 at 11:45 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated personal protective equipment (PPE) was not to be stored or reused because there was enough PPE provided by the facility. The DON stated if staff go on break, they are to discard the PPE, including the face shield and obtain a new one. The DON stated the face shield should not be sitting at the nursing station and was unsure whether it was clean or not, but stated it was already exposed and could be contaminated. During an interview on 2/25/22 at 9:59 a.m. with Infection Preventionist Nurse ([IP] nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-01 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program ([ASP] a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events [unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects which may impair a resident's ability to function at their highest possible level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being) related to antibiotic use including, but not limited to developing resistance to infections], associated with antibiotic use) for two of three sampled residents (Resident 140 and 147). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to receive an inappropriate antibiotic and develop antibiotic resistance (when infection causing bacteria develop the ability to defeat the antibiotic designed to kill them). Findings: a. During a review of Resident 140's admission Record, the admission information indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses not limited to urinary tract infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in safe operating condition with wires not being exposed for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 381). This deficient practice had the potential for a fire due to exposed wires, placing Resident 381 at risk for burns. Findings: During a review of Resident 381's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 381 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system, which includes kidneys, bladder, ureters, and urethra), atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm that occurs when the electrical signals to the two upper chambers of the heart fire rapidly at the same time), and essential (primary) hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure that is often due to obesity, family history, and an unhealthy diet). During a review of Resident 381's Nursing admission Screening/History (NASH), a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DILLER FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2010 |
| FRANKEL FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2010 |
| LEAH ROSENBAUM FAMILY 2008 GRANTOR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/15/2008 |
| LTC INVESTORS D-BW, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2010 |
| LTC INVESTORS D-HJ LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2010 |
| WDW JOINT VENTURE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/24/1980 |
| ROSENBAUM, LEAH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 08/15/2008 |
| ROSENBERG, SHERYL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/05/2012 |
| WEISS, BARRY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 09/18/2013 |
| COBERLY, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 08/01/2008 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555128. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.