No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Granite Hills Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LLC

1340 E Madison Ave, El Cajon, CA 92021 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (619) 447-1020 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (619) 447-1020 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Mar 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$14,015 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $14,015 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-04)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1319 E Main St · (619) 447-6001 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.4 mi
215 N 2nd St · (619) 401-0761 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1435 E Main St · (619) 440-1423 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1291 E Main St · (619) 905-0584 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.5%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.1%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.0%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.7%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.8%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.1%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.0%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.2%12.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.4%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.3%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.2%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.8%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.592.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.841.571.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 127 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.29hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.5%CMS range 47.1–65.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 8.0–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge69.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.1–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.171.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.57
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.06
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 90.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-01-30)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2021-06-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

56 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent accidents for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) who has left sided hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided weakness) when the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan that addressed Resident 1's physical limitation and failed to ensure the staff implemented appropriate interventions when certified nursing assistant (CNA 1) left the bedside table positioned on the resident's left-side, rendering necessary items inaccessible and requiring Resident 1 to reach across the body which posed a risk of Resident 1 falling off the bed. These failures resulted in Resident 1 sustaining an unwitnessed fall on 12/6/2025. Resident 1 went to the hospital and was admitted for a forehead laceration and femoral neck fracture (fractured hip).Findings:On 12/30/2025 at 1:00 P.M., an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted for an abbreviated survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for one of three residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents. Resident 1, who was known to have a history of suicidal attempt (the act of intentionally causing one ' s death), was left unattended during a mealtime, and swallowed part of a metal fork. As a result, Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital to remove the metal fork from her body. Findings: Resident 1 ' s clinical admission record was reviewed on 4/3/24. Per Resident 1 ' s admission record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility ' s secured unit (a specially designed space for residents to have resources they require to live safely) on 2/12/24. Per the same admission record, Resident 1 ' s diagnoses included personal history of suicidal behavior. A review of Resident 1's hospital clinical record prior to being admitted to the facility was conducted. According to Resident 1 ' s ED (Emergency Department) Note, dated 10/27/23, Resident 1 swallowed the temple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from significant medication errors when Resident 1 received two medications (solatol- used to treat heart rhythm problems and apixaban- a blood thinner that reduces blood clotting), which were intended for another resident. This failure resulted in the potential to affect Resident 1's health and well-being and placed other residents at risk for medication errors.Findings:During a record review, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (a stroke), and epilepsy (a seizure disorder). During a record review, the MDS (Minimum Data Set- an assessment tool) dated 5/19/25 indicated Resident 1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool to measure cognition) of 14, which indicated intact cognition. During a record review, the admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four medication carts and narcotic storage boxes was locked, secured, and inaccessible to unauthorized staff, residents and visitors.This failure had the potential for visitors, residents, and unauthorized staff to access medications and narcotics stored in the medication carts.Findings:On 7/2/25 at 10:21 A.M., an observation was conducted in the west station hallway. A medication cart was in front of a resident room. The cart was unattended and was unlocked with the key observed inserted into one of the cart's drawers. On 7/2/25 at 10:28 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2. LN 2 was observed walking out of a resident's room and opened the top drawer of the medication cart. LN 2 removed the keys from the cart drawer and placed the keys in her pocket. LN 2 stated she left the medication cart unlocked and the keys were in the narcotic storage box. LN 2 stated, I thought I was only going to be in the room for a few seconds. LN 2 stated she should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin within 24 hours for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1's injury of unknown origin to not be reported to the state licensing/certification office, delayed the abuse investigation, and placed residents at risk for abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record on 3/13/25, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness and dementia (a condition which causes memory loss, language, and problem-solving skills). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a care planning and assessment tool), dated 1/2/25 indicated Resident 1 's cognition (ability to think, understand and make daily decisions) was 7, which suggested severe cognitive impairment. On 3/13/25 at 12:36 P.M., an interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1. LN 1 stated on 3/9/25 around 11 A.M . she observed Resident 1 .having an altercation with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, intervention, and record review, the facility failed to follow safe food practices when: 1. The ceiling above the kitchen tray line area had peeling and bubbling paint; and, 2. Two staff members entered the kitchen without donning (to put on) hair coverings. This failure had the potential for unsanitary products to fall into resident food or onto kitchen equipment. Findings: 1. An observation was conducted of the ceiling within in the kitchen, over the food tray line area on 1/28/25 at 9:20 A.M. The ceiling had an approximately 5 inch by 5 inch area of peeling paint. Pieces of peeling paint were hanging downwards. North on the ceiling, from the peeling paint area was a large section of bubbling paint estimated at 5 inches by 10 inches in size. An interview and record review was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 1/28/25 at 9:55 A.M. regarding the kitchen ceiling. The CDM stated the bubbling paint could start to peel and the peeling paint could flake off and fall down into resident food, which could cause harm. The CDM stated she believed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide and promote a homelike atmosphere for four of 15 resident rooms (11, 19, 21, 22), within the secured unit (a specialized care unit which is locked and limits residents with memory loss and/or mental health issues from exiting the unit without supervision), when reviewed for Resident Rights. This failure had the potential for residents to feel disrespected and undervalued. Findings: 1. An observation was conducted of the secured unit, room [ROOM NUMBER] on 1/27/25 at 3:03 P.M. The room sink was in the middle of the main room. The sink's faucet was covered on both sides and underneath with lime green calcification. An observation and interview regarding room [ROOM NUMBER] was conducted with the Director of Maintenance (DM) on 1/28/25 at 2:34 P.M. The DM stated he started at the facility in July 2024 and had never performed an inspection of the resident rooms on the secured unit. The DM viewed the sink faucet and stated, That's nasty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms from environmental hazards for six of 15 rooms (12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 21), reviewed for accidents. In addition, the facility failed to provide two-person lifting assistance while transferring one of one resident (Resident 29 ) from a wheelchair to bed using a mechanical lifting device (a hydraulic devices with a sling used for transfers) with one staff, (Two staff always required for mechanical lifts). These failures had the potential for residents to sustain injuries from hazards identified in their rooms and from mechanical lifts or transfers. Findings: 1. An observation was conducted of room [ROOM NUMBER] on the secured unit (a specialized care unit which is locked and limits residents with memory loss or mental health issues from exiting the unit without supervision) on 1/27/25 at 4:02 P.M. A cable wire was protruding from the wall next to the closet area. Plastic cord covers on the wall were brittle and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-30 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI-plan developed by the QAA committee to improve conditions in the facility) failed to identify deficient practices prior to to their recertification survey when: 1) The facility did not provide education to staff related to the management of residents with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental condition that's caused by an extreme event - either being part of it or witnessing it) and, 2) Did not identify and correct environmental hazards which could have caused injury. These failures had the potential to negatively affect residents' health and quality of life. Findings. Cross reference : F-584, F-689, and F699. 1) A joint interview on 1/30/2025 at 2:27 P.M., with the Administrator (ADM) and the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. The DON stated there was no education provided to staff regarding PTSD and triggers associated. The DON stated the importance of QAA committee was identifying the trends and to maintain residents health condition, prevent possible decline and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess, document, and transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS-a clinical assessment tool), information to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS-A federal agency that oversees health insurance) regarding a vision assessment for one of eight residents (Resident 3), reviewed for Resident Assessment. As a result, CMS was uninformed of Resident 3's impaired vision. Cross reference (F-685) Findings: Resident 3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (a progressive brain disorder that causes nerve cells in the brain to deteriorate, leading to body movement problems), per the facility's admission Record. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 3 on 1/27/25 at 12:52 P.M. in his room. Resident 3 was earlier heard telling staff if did not want his lunch tray and to take it away. Resident 3 was observed dressed, lying in bed. Resident 3 stated he did not want his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan to manage combative behavior for one of three residents (Resident 84) reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living- eating, dressing, showering, grooming and toileting). As a result, there was potential for the resident to not receive individualized care. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebral infarction (a stroke), and anxiety disorder. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 12/16/24 indicated Resident 84 had a BIMS (a tool that measures cognition) of 3 and was cognitively impaired. On 1/28/25 at 4:02 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) 13 and 14 in Resident 84's room. CNA 13 was attempting to give Resident 84 a shave while CNA 14 was standing on Resident 84's left side. CNA 14's hand was placed on Resident 84's left arm. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address a residents' visual impairment in a timely manner for one of two residents (Resident 3), reviewed for Quality of Care. As a result, Resident 3 experience weight loss due to being unable to see his food. Cross Reference (F-641 and F-692) Findings: Resident 3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (a progressive brain disorder that causes nerve cells in the brain to deteriorate, leading to body movement problems), per the facility's admission Record. An observation was conducted of Resident 3 on 1/27/24 at 9:58 A.M., in his room. Resident 3 had a covered, untouched breakfast tray sitting on his bedside table. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 3 on 1/27/25 at 12:52 P.M. in his room. Resident 3 was heard telling staff if did not want his lunch tray and to take it away. An unidentified staff returned Resident 3's lunch tray to the food cart. Resident 3 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 44 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to investigate and analyze the root cause for recent weight loss for one of one resident (Resident 3) reviewed for nutrition. This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to experience additional weight loss. (Cross Reference F-641, F-685, F-842) Findings: Resident 3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (a progressive brain disorder that causes nerve cells in the brain to deteriorate, leading to body movement problems), per the facility's admission Record. An observation was conducted of Resident 3 on 1/27/25 at 9:58 A.M., in his room. Resident 3 had a covered, untouched breakfast tray sitting on his bedside table. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 3 on 1/27/25 at 12:52 P.M. in his room. Resident 3 was heard telling staff if did not want his lunch tray and to take it away. An unidentified staff returned Resident 3's lunch tray to the food cart. Resident 3 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify triggers related to PTSD ( post-traumatic stress disorder- difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event ) for two of two residents (Resident 27 and 35) reviewed for trauma-informed care. This failure had the potential to result in re-traumatization (the reactivation of trauma symptoms via thoughts, memories, or feelings related to the past traumatic experience) that could lead to severe psychosocial harm and affect the resident's quality of life. Findings: 1.) A record review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, and schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that affects thought, mood and behavior). An interview on 1/27/25 at 10:50 A.M., with Resident 27 was conducted . Resident 27 stated the staff here did not know how to handle his PTSD. Resident 27 stated, his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor behaviors and side effects of a psychotropic medication (a drug to control thoughts and behaviors) for one of five residents (Resident 11) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for receiving unnecessary medication and having unrecognized adverse reactions. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Tourette's Disorder (a disorder that causes people to make sudden and repeated twitches, movements, or sounds) and dementia. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) Resident 11 had a BIMS (a tool to assess cognition) of 8, which indicated cognitive impairment. On 1/27/25 at 8:46 A.M., an observation was conducted in Resident 11's room. Resident 11 was in bed and repeatedly stated, [NAME]! [NAME]! [NAME]! Resident 11 was observed with an open wound between the upper lip and nose. Resident 11 did not respond to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure one of three treatment carts (East Station) and one of three medication carts (East Station), when reviewed for Pharmacy Services. This failure had the potential for residents, staff, and visitors to have access to unauthorized medications and wound supplies. Findings: An observation was conducted on 1/30/25 at 7:15 A.M., in East Station area near the nurse's station. A treatment cart was up against the wall between the nurse's station and the exit door to the secured unit (a specialized care unit which is locked and limits residents with memory loss or mental health issues from exiting the unit without supervision), and was unlocked. In the top drawer of the treatment cart were prescriptions creams and ointments. The second drawer contained scissors and wound dressing material. No staff were present in the area. An observation was conducted on 1/30/25 at 7:16 A.M., in the East Station area across from the treatment cart. A medication cart was pushed up against the exterior nurse's station and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately document: 1. Food intake percentages (how much a resident consumes for each meal) for one of one resident (Resident 3), reviewed for nutrition; and 2. Care given to one of three residents (Resident 84) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL'S). As a result, resident records were inaccurate and did not give a clear picture of the resident's current status to other care providers. Cross Reference (F-692) Findings: 1. Resident 3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (a progressive brain disorder that causes nerve cells in the brain to deteriorate, leading to body movement problems), per the facility's admission Record. An observation was conducted of Resident 3 on 1/27/24 at 9:58 A.M., in his room. Resident 3 had a covered, untouched breakfast tray sitting on his bedside table. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 3 on 1/27/25 at 12:52 P.M. in his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure for fall prevention program for two of three sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3) who had incidents of repeated falls. This failure placed Residents 2 and 3 at risk for further falls and injuries. Findings: 1) According to the admission Record, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included history of falling, lack of coordination, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. A review of the facility's Incidents By Incident Type log indicated Resident 2 had unwitnessed falls on 11/1/24 and 12/3/24. On 12/27/24 at 9:55 A.M., Resident 2 was observed in bed. There was a small cut on the left side of Resident 2's forehead. Resident 2's call light was observed plugged into the wall and was missing the cord and button. On 12/27/24 at 10:04 A.M., a concurrent interview and observation was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1. CNA 1 stated she was the assigned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were honored for 1 of 3 sample residents (1) when the Medical Record Department (MRD) could not provide evidence that Resident 1's representative received copies of the medical record requested in a timely manner. As a result, there was a delay in reviewing Resident 1's medical record. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia, per the admission Record. On 10/2/24 at 2:20 P.M., an unannounced onsite visit at the facility was conducted for an complaint investigation related to a medical record request. On 10/2/24 at 3 P.M., an interview was conducted with the Medical Record Director (MRD). The MRD stated she did not have a log of the names of the residents or representatives who requested access to medical records. The MRD further stated their process was for the resident or representative to complete the request form. The MRD then asked the corporation via e-mail for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-24 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate discharge protocols for one of one resident (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not being able to return to the facility which he considered his home and not being able to appeal the discharge. Finding: During a review of the admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of End Stage Renal Disease (irreversible kidney failure). During a review of the Bed Hold Agreement dated September 10, 2024. The Bed Hold agreement indicated that the facility will hold Resident 1 ' s bed for up to seven (7) days if the resident is transferred to a general acute care hospital The document indicated that Resident 1 was being transferred to [name] Hospital. During a review of the facility census, it indicated Resident 1 had a bedhold for September 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16. Per the same facility census, on September 17, 18, 19 it indicated Resident 1 was no longer on the census and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to provide a medication as ordered by the physician to one (Resident 1) of three sampled residents. This failure had the potential to elevate Resident 1 ' s ammonia levels. Resident 1 ' s record was reviewed. Per Resident 1's admission Record, Resident 1 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 ' s diagnosis included cirrhosis of the liver (scarring that prevents the liver from working properly) and hepatic encephalopathy (loss of brain function when the liver does not work properly). During a record review of Resident 1 ' s admission orders dated 8/30/24, Resident 1 was admitted with a physician's order for lactulose (a medication used to prevent and treat hepatic encephalopathy) 30 grams by mouth three times a day. During a record review of Resident 1 ' s Medication Administration Record (MAR) for August 2024, the Licensed Nurse (LN) had not initialed or signed (recorded administration) lactulose medication was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that cooks followed recipes when preparing meals. This deficient practice had the potential to impact the residents' nutritional status and not meet the residents' desires to be served food they felt was palatable and attractive. Findings: Between 6/24/24 and 6/25/24, nine alert, oriented residents were interviewed. Five complained of bad food ; bland food ; horrible, especially lunch ; not great, too small ; and losing weight due to bad food all day . On 6/24/24 at 1 P.M. an observation and interview were held with Diet Assistant (DA) 1. Raw chicken in bags were observed on top of ice-filled cooking sheets. DA 1 stated she was going to prepare the chicken for dinner. The chicken will go in the oven around 2:30 P.M., cook for 30-45 minutes and then go to the steam table. On 6/24/24 at 1:15 P.M. an interview was held with the Food Services Director (FSD). The FSD stated that putting the chicken in the oven as DA 1 planned, at 2:30, was too soon, and would affect the palatability, making the chicken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan for one of two residents (Resident 1) reviewed for elopement (leaving the facility without permission). This failure had the potential to put Resident 1 at risk for further elopements and injury. Findings: On 7/18/24, an unannounced visit was made to the facility following a facility reported incident of a resident's elopement from the secured unit. According to the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include paranoid schizophrenia (a mental disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly) and bipolar disorder (a mental condition that causes extreme mood swings). On 7/18/24 at 10:26 A.M., an observation was conducted in the secured unit. Resident 1's bedroom was observed with a sliding glass door leading to the outside patio. On 7/18/24 at 10:50 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate for 1 of 2 sampled residents to meet the standard of practice, when Resident 1 had a blood draw performed (a procedure in which a needle is used to take blood from a vein, usually for laboratory testing). As a result, Resident 1's medical record could not accurately reflect the care provided. This lack of documentation poses a potential risk to Resident 1's health, as it hinders the ability to track and monitor the effectiveness of the care provided. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included End Stage Renal Failure (kidneys can no longer support the body's needs) and renal dialysis (a type of treatment that helps the body remove extra fluid and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to), per the admission Record. On 3/28/24 at 3 P.M., Resident 1 stated he woke up and saw the phlebotomist (a trained professional who draws blood) draw…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention was followed when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 was inside the isolation room without appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE-equipment worn to minimize exposure to infectious agents). As a result, there was a potential for cross-contamination (physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria or viruses from one person, object or place to another). Findings: On 3/11/24 at 2:45 P.M., during the initial tour of the unit, signage indicating droplet precautions and PPE precautions was posted by the doors of rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. Personal Protective Equipment: N-95 masks, gowns, and gloves were also hung on the door for staff use. On 3/11/24 at 3 P.M., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door was observed opened, and CNA 2 was inside the isolation room without wearing proper PPE. CNA 2 was standing by the resident's bed near the handrail and talking to the resident. CNA 2 finished the conversation with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a fall. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a fractured clavicle (a bone of the shoulder that joins the breastbone and the shoulder blade). Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet indicated diagnoses of dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), abnormalities of gait and mobility (change in ability to walk), presence of left artificial hip joint (hip replacement), fracture of femur (a break in the long bone of the leg), fall on same level (a fall not more than the height of the person), lack of coordination (unsteadiness). A review of Resident 1's care plan dated 9/7/23 indicated an intervention of Adequate glare-free light and Be sure resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it. A review of Resident 1's care plan dated 12/14/23 indicated High backed reclining wheelchair. A review of Resident 1's care plan dated 12/25/23 indicated Room closer to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a proper discharge process for 1 of 2 sampled residents (1) when there was no documented evidence that the staff reviewed the personal property inventory and compared the medication list to the discharge medications. As a result, Resident 1's belongings and medications could not be accounted for. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on 7/12/23, per the facility's Face Sheet. A review of Resident 1's medical record was conducted. Per the Progress Notes, dated 7/12/23, Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 documented Resident 1 was discharged to an independent living with home health services. Resident 1 left the facility with all personal belongings and the remaining medications. Per the Resident Inventory Form, there were no signatures from Resident 1 and the staff under the sections Certification and Receipts to acknowledge all personal belongings were taken home by Resident 1. Per the Discharge Evaluation, there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop person-centered care plans for one resident (Resident 1) when care plans were not developed for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter (soft, plastic or rubber tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain the urine) and the presence of a pressure ulcer (a bedsore). This failure could potentially affect the resident in the care areas that were not care planned. These included proper attention and assessment of infection for the use of an indwelling catheter and monitoring of interventions which addressed Resident 1 ' s pressure ulcer. Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (thickening or hardening of the arteries) according to the facility ' s admission Record. During a review of Resident 1 ' s physician orders dated 4/4/22, the physician orders indicated, Insert Foley Catheter and attach to urine bag. During a review of Resident 1 ' s skin evaluation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five resident ' s (Resident 8) food dislike was honored. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 8 to experience an unplanned lose weight. Findings: A review of Resident 8 ' s undated admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder. A review of Resident 8 ' s Minimum Data Sheet (MDS- an assessment tool), dated 4/4/22, indicated that Resident 2 had a BIM (Brief Interview of Mental Status – used to screen and identify the mental condition of a resident) score of 10, and per the scoring table, a score of 8-12 indicated moderate cognitive (mental) impairment. A meal observation and interview of licensed nurse (LN) 1 was on conducted on 5/19/22 at 12:54 P.M. LN 1 opened the meal cart and checked the residents ' meal trays. LN 1 checked Resident 8 ' s meal and tray-card and handed the meal tray to a certified nursing assistant (CNA) to deliver the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility to provide results of an abuse investigation within five days of the incident for one of one resident (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse. This failure had the potential to result in a delay in the facility ' s investigation of abuse allegation, and a delay in determining the occurrence of abuse. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Dementia ((a condition characterized by loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities) according to Resident 1 ' s admission record. During an interview on 7/31/23, at 9:10 A.M., with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), the ADON stated Resident 1 was wheelchair bound and had a history of entering different rooms. The ADON stated on 7/17/23, Resident 1 had an altercation with the roommate (Resident 2). The ADON further stated staff heard the commotion from Resident 1 ' s room and separated Resident 1 from Resident 2. An interview was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-06-17 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and dietetic services record reviews, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective dietetic service oversight for food and nutrition services in accordance with the regulation and facility policies when: 1. One of two sampled residents (Resident 71) had a severe weight loss of 12.79 % in six months and was not adequately or timely assessed by the RD, 2. Kitchen staff were not sufficiently trained for competency in food safety and sanitation tasks, and 3. Kitchen sanitation inspections were not performed on a regular basis in accordance with facility protocols and standards of practice. These failures in dietetic services oversight placed 94 residents at risk for compromised nutrition status. Cross reference 692, 802, 812, and 813 Findings: During the annual recertification survey from 6/14/21-6/17/21, multiple issues and concerns regarding dietetic services were unmet and identified including: Regular timely nutrition assessments and monitoring of a resident with significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-06-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food and nutrition services staff maintained current competency in dietetic task operations to safely carry out the kitchen functions in a sanitary manner according to facility policies and standards of practice when: 1. The A.M. [NAME] (CK 1) could not correctly demonstrate how to test the sanitizer concentration; 2. A Dietary Aide (DA 1) did not take the temperatures or properly store the milk served on lunch trayline; 3. The P.M. [NAME] (CK 2) did not know the correct process to cool down cooked foods. These failures had the potential to result in contamination of food, leading to widespread food borne illness for 94 residents who consume food from the kitchen. Cross Reference F 812 Findings 1. On 6/14/21 at 9:30 A.M., an interview was conducted with CK 1 and the DSS. CK 1 stated he typically checked the sanitizer in the red bucket every morning when he worked. CK 1 demonstrated how he tested the sanitizer strength in a red bucket solution. CK 1 took a test strip from a test strip…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-06-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure safe and sanitary conditions were met according to facility policy and standards of practice within the Food and Nutrition Services department when: 1. Walk-in freezer was overstocked with ice accumulation on the ceiling and cases of foods; 2. A kitchen drawer that stored loose plastic lids to rubber bowls and cups, was covered in black dirt, brown stains, and food crumbs; 3. A nurse's unit refrigerator with resident food had a temperature of 50 degrees F for two days and was dirty with brown and orange stains inside the door shelves and freezer space. These deficient practices had the potential to put residents at risk to foodborne illnesses. Cross reference 801, 802, and 813 Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour observation and concurrent interview with the DSS, on 6/14/21 at 8:30 AM, the walk-in freezer ceiling had several areas of ice build-up. The freezer had approximately 1-2 inches of ice accumulation build-up on the ceiling and on top of three cases of food. The DSS stated she was unaware…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide showers for 28 of 32 dependent residents (Residents 15, 19, 21, 27, 36, 37, 38, 40, 41, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 63, 64, 65, 72, 75, 87, 93) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL, bathing, dressing and grooming) in the secured unit (requiring supervision). This failure had the potential for increased skin infections and a decrease in personal hygiene and socialization. Findings: 1. Resident 87 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), per the facility Face Sheet. On 6/14/21 at 8:39 A.M., Resident 87 was observed sitting on the side of his bed wearing a blue Charger's football jersey, with colored stains going down the front of his jersey. On 6/14/21, Resident 87's clinical record was reviewed: The MDS (a clinical assessment), dated 5/10/21, listed a BIMS score (a cognitive assessment) of 4, (score 0-7 indicates severely impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control prevention practices were followed appropriately, when: 1. Recommended COVID-19 (a contagious virus) personal protective equipment (PPE), which included the use of gowns, gloves, face shield, and N95 mask (higher level of face mask) were not worn by staff who entered the room of residents located in the yellow zone (unknown COVID-19 status for residents who were newly admitted or re-admitted to the facility), 2. Residents who smoked and were roomed in the yellow zone passed through the green zone (residents who have no exposure to COVID-19) to the smoking area; and, 3. An oxygen humidifier was resting on the floor of Resident 61's room. These failures had the potential for cross contamination of pathogens Findings: 1. On 6/14/21 at 9:35 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with LN 1 in the yellow zone. LN 1 went into a residents room without putting on a gown and provided care to a resident. LN 1 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop individualized person-centered care plans for three of 19 resident's, (Resident 63, 93, 82) reviewed for care plans when: 1. Resident 63's urinary catheter (a flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder into an external bag) preferences were not documented, 2. Resident 93's dementia (memory loss) was not identified; and, 3. Resident 83's skin condition of psoriasis (a skin disorder), was not addressed. In addition, a physician's order related to tube feeding was not followed for one of four residents (Resident 29) reviewed for medication administration. These failures had the potential for individualized care to not be consistently applied and for Resident 29 to have an alteration in nutritional status. Findings: 1. Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include hepatic failure (liver failure) per the facility's Face Sheet. On 6/14/21 at 10:16 A.M., an observation and interview with Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a person-centered care plan for four of 19 sampled residents (71, 345). These failures had the potential to negatively impact resident's quality of care. Findings: 1. Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (a disease that affects the brain, spinal cord and nerves), per the facility's Face Sheet. A record review was conducted: Resident 71's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated a weight loss of 5% or more between January and April of 2021. The weight log for Resident 71 had 12.79% weight loss in six months (December 2020 - May 2021). Resident 71's care plan, dated 10/14/20, indicated a risk for weight loss. There were no revisions or updates noted on the care plan to reflect actual weight loss. On 6/17/21 at 11:53 A.M., a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the DON. The DON stated Resident 71's care plan should have been updated and it was important to revise…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive and effective systematic approach was implemented to monitor and maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of two sampled residents (Resident 71). Resident 71 experienced a 12.79 percent weight loss in six months that was not addressed by the facility according to facility policy and standards of practice. As a result, Resident 71 had a severe unplanned weight loss. Cross reference F801 Findings: Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (a chronic disease that affects normal immune system function), per the facility's Face Sheet. An observation and concurrent interview was conducted with Resident 71 on 6/14/21 at 10:45 A.M. Resident 71 was lying in bed awake and stated, I didn't eat the breakfast because I don't really like the food here .I like yogurt and the strawberry health shakes they give me but that's it. A review of Resident 71's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was in place, prior to the administration of oxygen for one of two residents (Resident 61), reviewed for oxygen therapy. This failure had the potential for Resident 61 to develop oxygen toxicity (lung damage from too much oxygen being supplied). Findings: Resident 61 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included encephalopathy (a disease of the brain) per the facility's Face Sheet. On 6/14/21 9:54 A.M., an observation was conducted inside Resident 61's room. Resident 61 was sitting up in bed, with a nasal cannula (clean plastic tubing that delivers oxygen to the nose) in his nares (nose). The oxygen condenser (a medical device that delivers oxygen) was set at three liters of oxygen per minute (lpm). On 6/15/21 at 1:36 P.M., Resident 61 was observed in bed with his eyes closed, receiving oxygen at three lpm. On 6/15/21 a clinical record review was conducted for Resident 61: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain medication to one of one residents reviewed for pain (Resident 146). As a result, Resident 146 had uncontrolled pain. Findings: Resident 146 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included pain, per the facility's Face Sheet. On 6/15/21 at 10:04 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 146. Resident 146 stated she had to wait a few times for pain medication in the morning. Resident 146 stated she was told by staff, they ran out of the medication during the night. Resident 146 stated she needed it first thing upon waking up in the morning, since she had not received any medication overnight. Resident 146 stated she woke up around 5 A.M., and her pain level became uncontrolled if she did not receive medication soon after waking. A record review was conducted. Per the physician's orders, dated 6/2/21, Resident 146 was prescribed a pain medication every six hours as needed. The CDR was reviewed, for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a controlled substance medication (a controlled drug for pain with high abuse potential), was accounted for, for one of four residents reviewed for medication storage (Resident 29). This failure had the potential for the resident to receive more medication than ordered, and for staff diversion (theft). Findings: On 6/17/21 at 3 P.M., an observation of the east unit medication cart was conducted with LN 2. A random controlled medication card was removed for accuracy review. The medication card was labeled for Resident 29. The medication card label indicated Oxycodone/APAP (a pain medication) one tablet every six hours as needed for pain. Resident 29's CDR (a document to initial each dose of a controlled drug each time the medication was administered to the resident) and the MAR were reviewed for the timeframe of 6/1/21 through 6/15/21. The CDR had six doses that were signed out, but the MAR had not been documented on to indicate the medication was given. On 6/17/21 at 3:10 P.M., an interview was conducted with LN 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. The facility's medication error rate was 15.63%. Out of a total of 32 opportunities, five medication errors were observed during the medication administration process for three of three randomly observed residents (84, 34). As a result, the facility could not ensure medications were correctly administered to all residents. Findings: 1. On 6/16/21 at 8:40 A.M., an observation of medication administration was conducted with LN 1. LN 1 prepared and administered medication to Resident 84, including Carafate (an antacid) and Reglan (a medication to prevent vomiting). The oral medications were administered together. Upon completion of the medication administration, Resident 84 requested her morning dose of insulin. LN 1 stated Resident 84 did not get any insulin in the morning. Resident 84 stated she usually got insulin with her breakfast. Upon request, a record review was conducted of Resident 84's MAR with LN 1. Insulin was ordered for morning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-17 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary practices were implemented for residents' food brought in from the outside according to the facility policy. Failure to ensure safe storage and reheating procedures for residents' food from the outside has the potential to expose 94 residents to foodborne contamination in the facility. Findings: On 6/15/21 at 3:14 P.M., an observation and interview was conducted with LN 8 about resident food brought in from the outside. LN 8 stated resident food brought in from the outside should be labeled with the resident's name and date, then stored in the nurse's station refrigerator for 24 hours. The nurse's station refrigerator thermometer indicated 50 degrees F and had four cartons of Medplus (a high protein drink) and a bowl of applesauce dated 6/15/21. LN 8 stated the nurse's station refrigerator temperature at 50 degrees F was okay to store food safely. On 6/15/21 at 4:00 P.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 17 about resident food brought from the outside. CNA 17 stated resident food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-17 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), program failed to identify, implement, and evaluate systematic measures to ensure effective oversight, which were identified in the Federal recertification survey, dated 6/14/21 through 6/17/21, related to: 1. Weight loss and nutritional service (F-692) and; 2. Pharmacy services (F-755). As a result, the facility was noncompliant with deficiencies cited during the survey, which had the potential to affect the health and safety of the residents. Findings: On 06/17/21 at 4:22 P.M., an interview was conducted with the ADM, DON, and DSD regarding the facility's QA (Quality Assurance) committee. The ADM stated all department heads, attended the monthly QA meetings. The ADM stated their QAPI committee over the past year focused on staffing, COVID-19, bowel and bladder incontinence, pressure ulcers, and the reduction of behaviors both short term and long term. 1. The ADM stated the RD was in the building one day a week, and attended the monthly QA meetings. The ADM stated weights were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely personal care for three of 19 residents (16, 40 and 51), reviewed for dignity issues. This failure had the potential to cause psychosocial harm for the residents. Findings: 1. Resident 16 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include end stage renal disease (ESRD-irreversible kidney failure) and dependence on renal dialysis (artificial process of removing waste products and extra fluid from the body), per the facility's Face Sheet. Per the record review of Resident 16's most recent MDS (an assessment tool) assessment, dated 5/3/19, the resident scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (assessment of the ability to think and reason) which indicated the resident was cognitively intact (has ability, to think, reason and remember). Resident 16's MDS also indicated he required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, toilet use and hygiene. Resident 16's care plan, titled Bowel and Bladder, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan which specifically addressed a language barrier for one of two residents reviewed for communication (28). This failure had the potential for Resident 28 's needs to not be met. Findings: According to the facility's Face Sheet, Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of aphasia (a partial loss of the ability to speak). In Section A of Resident 28's MDS (a comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional capabilities), Resident 28's identified preferred language was language X, (not English). On 8/5/19 at 8:19 A.M., an observation of Resident 28 was conducted. Resident 28 was alone in her room. No communication board (board with symbols or pictures used to communicate with residents who do not speak English) was present at bedside or in Resident 28's drawer. On 8/5/19 at 8:20 A.M., an interview with LN 1 was conducted. LN 1 stated Resident 28 spoke and understood language Y (not English).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to communicate with one of two sampled residents (28) in her preferred language. This failure had the potential for Resident 28 to not have her needs met. Findings: Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of history aphasia (a partial loss of the ability to speak) per the facility's face sheet. In Section A of Resident 28's MDS, (a comprehensive assessment of a resident's functional capabilities), Resident 28's identified preferred language is language X (not English). On 8/5/19 at 8:19 A.M., an observation of Resident 28 was conducted. Resident 28 was alone in her room. No communication board (board with symbols or pictures used to communicate with residents who do not speak English) was present at bedside or in Resident 28's drawer. On 8/5/19 at 8:20 A.M., an interview with LN 1 was conducted. LN 1 stated he could not really communicate with Resident 28. LN 1 stated Resident 28 speaks language Y. LN 1 stated he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to identify the needs of one of two residents reviewed for pain management (52). This failure had the potential for Resident 52's pain to go unrecognized and untreated. Findings: Per the facility Face Sheet, Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of Alzheimer's disease (a disease affecting memory and function). On 8/5/19 at 8:38 A.M., an observation of Resident 52 was conducted. Resident 52 was observed to be moved to the hallway via wheelchair by CNA 3. CNA 3 then left the area. Resident 52 called out, but no staff responded. On 8/5/19 at 9:10 A.M., an observation of CNA 3 and Resident 52 was conducted. Resident 52 was observed to be touching her right arm and saying, I have pain. CNA 3 stated, I will take you to the activity, but did not acknowledge the complaint of pain. On 8/5/19 at 9:15 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with CNA 3. CNA 3 stated she would report Resident 52's pain to the LN. CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff assessed the residents' dialysis (artificial process of removing waste products and extra fluid from the body) graft (access site) for the bruit (sound associated with blood flow through the shunt) or thrill (a sensation felt over the graft indicating blood flow) presence or absence for one of one resident's (16) reviewed for dialysis care. This failure could result in complications related to dialysis treatment and infection. Findings: Resident 16 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include end stage renal disease (ESRD-irreversible kidney failure) and dependence on renal dialysis, per the facility's Face Sheet. On 8/5/19, a record review was conducted. Resident 16's MDS (an assessment tool), dated 5/3/19, indicated a BIMS (an assessment of the ability to think and reason) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact (has ability, to think, reason and remember). On 3/8/19, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to provide care in a timely manner for four of 19 sampled residents (252,16, 40 and 51). These failures had the potential to result in resident's needs not being met in a timely manner, and to result in physical and/or psychosocial harm. Findings: 1. Resident 252 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's Face Sheet. On 8/5/19, a record review was conducted. According to Resident 252's Resident admission Assessment, dated 7/21/19, the resident was aware of self, place and time. On 8/5/19 at 10:02 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 252. Resident 252 stated she would wait 30 to 60 minutes, especially on evening and night shift, for the call light to be answered. Resident 252 stated she considered that long of a wait unacceptable. 2. Resident 16 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's Face Sheet. On 8/5/19, a record review was conducted. Resident 16's BIMS (assessment of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure concerns related to the lack of behavior monitoring for the use of an antipsychotic medication, was identified during the medication regimen review for one of five residents (29). This failure had the potential for Resident 29 to be placed on psychoactive medication unnecessarily. Findings: Per the facility's face sheet, Resident 29 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include generalized psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality). According to the History and Physical, dated 7/11/19, the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 29's minimum data set assessment (assessment tool), dated 5/9/19, the resident had a BIMS (assessment of cognitive status) of 14 on a scale of 0-15 (13-15 score indicated intact cognitive response). A review of Resident 29's physician orders indicated the following: - Clozaril (an anti-psychotic medication) 350 mg at bedtime and to monitor for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (29) was free from unnecessary use of psychoactive medications when: 1. An inappropriate target behavior was monitored for the use of an antipsychotic medication. 2. Behavior monitoring for the use of an antipsychotic, anti-anxiety, and a mood stabilizer medications was not consistently performed and documented. 3. A hypnotic medication was ordered and administrated without clear indications for its use. These failures had a potential for Resident 29 to experience unnecessary side effects from the psychoactive medications. Findings: 1. Per the facility's face sheet, Resident 29 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include generalized psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality). According to the History and Physical, dated 7/11/19, the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 29's minimum data set assessment (assessment tool), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional needs of the residents when portion sizes were not followed during the lunch meal on 8/7/19. This failure had the potential for residents to not receive adequate nutrition, further compromising their medical status. Findings: A record review of the menu spreadsheet provided by the facility for use on lunch, 8/7/19, titled Summer Menus, Week 1 Wednesday, showed Broccoli with garlic, 1/2 cup serving for all diets. On 8/7/19 at 11:56 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted in the kitchen. The trayline began serving lunch trays at 12:00 P.M. The broccoli with garlic had a serving utensil, or scoop, set in it for serving portions. The scoop was a #12, indicating 1/3 cup. Two trays were served the broccoli with garlic using the #12 scoop. Per CK 1, the menu spreadsheet listed a #12 scoop for the broccoli with garlic. The DSS then referred to the menu spreadsheet, and stated, It says #8 scoop. We used the wrong size. The scoop was replaced with the correct one. On 8/7/19 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to deliver food at appetizing temperatures. As a result, residents were at risk of foodborne illness and unplanned weight loss. Findings: On 8/6/19 at 10:10 A.M., a confidential interview was conducted. Three of the five residents present stated the hot foods arrived cold. CR 3 stated, I've gotten all three meals too cold. On 8/7/19, starting at 12:00 P.M., during a lunch meal observation a test tray was requested on the last cart delivered (west nursing station). The temperatures at the start of the meal service were as follows: Tahitian Chicken: 180 degrees F (Fahrenheit, a measurement of heat) Classic Rice: 180 degrees F Broccoli with Garlic: 170 degrees F Chocolate Pudding: 35 degrees F Milk: 38 degrees F Water: 40 degrees F During the observation, the cart for the west nursing station was delivered at 12:59 P.M., and the test tray was removed after the last resident received their tray at 1:20 P.M. The test tray temperatures were checked in the presence of the Admin. The temperature of the food on the tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner. As a result, residents were at risk of foodborne illness. Findings: On 8/8/19 at 2 P.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted at the east nursing station. A refrigerator, designated for residents, was opened. Per the DSS, the refrigerator was only to be used for patient food. The refrigerator contained: Chobani yogurt, expiration date 7/10/19 Red Bull (a caffeinated beverage) Three plastic containers of fruit cocktail, dated 8/5/19 Two sandwiches, unlabeled and undated Styrofoam plate with cut fruit, plastic wrapped, unlabeled and undated 4 oz. milk in a plastic cup, unlabeled and undated One plastic container of applesauce, unlabeled and undated One used, dirty plastic spoon One covered plate of facility food, unlabeled and undated On 8/8/19 at 2:44 P.M., an interview was conducted with the DSS. Per the DSS, all foods should have been labeled and dated. The DSS stated the refrigerator had some foods which must have been brought from outside the facility, since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep accurate medical records for two of 19 sampled residents (50, 298). This failure had the potential for: 1. Resident 50 to have improper psychiatric treatment based on incorrect information included in her psychiatric evaluation. 2. Resident 298 to have incorrect treatment based on disorganized documentation in the medical record. Findings: 1. Per the facility Face Sheet, Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 8/5/19 at 10:25 A.M., Resident 50 was observed pacing the hallway and occasionally making hissing noises with her mouth. Resident 50 did not speak while pacing in the hallway. On 8/7/19 at 11:37 A.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 5. CNA 5 stated she has cared for Resident 50 for over a year. CNA 5 stated Resident 50 cannot talk. CNA 5 stated Resident 50 uses a hissing sound to communicate. On 8/8/19 at 8:13 A.M., an interview was conducted with CNA 4. CNA 4 stated she took care of Resident 50 often. CNA 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$14,015 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $14,015 — penalty dated 2026-02-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BLONDER, DAVIDIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/15/2012
CORPORATE INTERFACE SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/15/2012
BENSON, JIMIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
RECHNITZ, SHLOMOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/15/2012
SAVELKOUL, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/21/2025
ERETZ GRANITE HILLS PROPERTIES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/29/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 16%Other / private 10%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$417per resident / day
operating cost
$12,676per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$372per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555878. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next