Valley Vista Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 54.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that four out of five sampled residents (Residents 2, 10, 19 and 49) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (affecting brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when: 1. For Resident 10, the facility did not implement resident specific non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs, behavioral treatments that do not involve medications) for the use of clonazepam (medication used to treat anxiety), mirtazapine (medication used to treat depression), risperidone (antipsychotic medication that balances certain chemicals in the brain to help a person feel calmer and think clearly), buspirone (medication used to treat anxiety) and sertraline (medication used to treat depression).2. For Resident 49, the facility did not implement resident specific NPIs for the use of duloxetine (medication used to treat depression), lamotrigine (medication used to treat mood disorders), trazodone (medication used to treat depression) and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmacy services in accordance with accepted standards of practice when:1. Random controlled medication (medications with a high abuse potential) use audit for five of six sampled residents (Residents 3, 7, 25, 40 and 55) showed that medications were signed out of the controlled drug record (CDR, count sheet used to track controlled medications), but were not documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate they were administered to the residents. This failure had the potential for diversion (unlawful distribution or use), mismanagement of controlled medications, and the potential to not meet the needs of the residents in the facility. 2. Medications were not available for two of five sampled residents (Residents 2 and 42) when they were scheduled to be administered. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to experience high blood pressure and Resident 42 to experience heartburn and pain.3. Two diabetes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate did not exceed five percent or greater, when observation of 42 opportunities during medication administration resulted in five errors. The calculated medication error rate was 11.9%.This failure resulted in1. Placing Resident 29 at risk of not breaking down and absorbing nutrients from food when Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 crushed and administered pancrelipase (digestive enzymes used to break down food during digestion) Delayed Release (DR, designed to release medication slowly over a period).Placing Resident 29 at risk of inadequate pain relief when LN 1 crushed and administered gabapentin (medication used for pain).2. Placing Resident 42 at risk of high blood pressure when LN 31 did not administer hydralazine (a medication used to treat high blood pressure).3. Placing Resident 2 at risk for heartburn, indigestion and upset stomach when LN 32 did not administer calcium carbonate (medication used to decrease acid in the stomach).Placing Resident 2 at risk for inadequate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify and develop an effective quality assessment and performance improvement plan (QAPI- a data driven proactive approach to improvement used to ensure services are meeting quality standards) in the following areas related to:1) cross reference F 755- Pharmacy services- the facility failed to ensure the control drug record (CDR) matches the medication administration record (MAR) of controlled drugs of the residents for five out of six residents reviewed. 2) cross reference F 677- ADL care provided for dependent residents- the facility failed to provide nail care assistance for two out of 17 residents reviewed.These failures had the potential to affect the resident's health and condition. On 9/11/25 at 3:45 P.M., a QAPI meeting with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator (ADM) was conducted.The ADM stated fingernail trimming and the controlled drug record not matching the medication administration record was new to us. The DON stated it was important to identify issues affecting the residents in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control standards of practice when an air vent blew out dust balls during meals in the dining room. This deficient practice had the potential to contaminate residents' food and affect the residents' respiratory status.Findings:During the dining room meal observation on 9/8/25 at 11:30 AM, there were 15 residents seated around eight separate tables. The air conditioner was on and a round air vent in the ceiling was directly above a table with residents. The air vent blew out three dust balls and the Activity Director (AD) swept up the dust balls from the floor. The air vent was observed with gray dust above a table with residents. At 11:51 A.M. a staff member brought the meal cart which was also near the air vent with gray dust. Staff proceeded with passing out meal trays with the cart wide open and the round dusty air vent blew air from the ceiling. Another observation in the dining room was conducted on 9/9/25 at 7:36 A.M. The air conditioner was on and the air vent still had gray dust.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an alternative call light system to one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 68). This failure had the potential for Resident 68 to experience a delay in care. Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder that worsens over time) and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 68's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/29/25, Resident 68 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) of 9 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. On 9/8/25 at 8:24 A.M., an observation was conducted. Resident 68 was observed laying in bed and stated, I'm ready to get up.I'm waiting to eat breakfast, I can't use my hands. Resident 68…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to provide a written notice and duration of bed hold for one of three residents (Resident 65) reviewed for bed hold notice. This failure had the potential for the resident and/or resident's representative to not have information regarding bed hold rights. Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter waste products from the blood). A review of the progress notes dated, 6/25/25 indicated, Resident 65 was transferred to the acute hospital due to wounds on his buttocks.A review of Resident 65's medical record indicated, there was no documentation to confirm Resident 65 was notified of the bed hold when Resident 65 was transferred to the acute hospital.A review of Resident 65's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool) dated, 6/7/25 indicated, Resident 65's brief interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed for 2 of 17 residents (Residents 2 and 19) reviewed for baseline care plans. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 and Resident 19 to not receive appropriate care. Findings:1) Per the facility's admission Record , Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Schizoaffective Disorder(a mental illness that could affect thoughts, mood and behavior) and Major Depressive Disorder.A review of Resident 2's minimum data set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool) dated, 7/22/25 indicated, Resident 2's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 which indicated Resident 2's cognition (thought process) was intact.A review of Resident 2's order summary report indicated, Resident 2 was on the following psychotropic medications (drugs that affect mental processes and behaviors): Fluoxetine 20 mg 1 capsule by mouth daily for depression; Lorazepam 0.5 mg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 17 residents (Resident 10 and Resident 49), who needed to carry out activities of daily living (ADL- self-care activities such as grooming, bathing, and toileting), received assistance with nail care (cleaning, trimming and/or filing of nails). As a result of this deficient practice, residents' fingernails were long and had the potential for skin injury and infection. Findings:1. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (an impairment of brain function, such as memory loss and judgment) and chronic pain according to the facility's admission Record. During an interview and observation on 9/8/25 at 8:09 A.M., Resident 10 was in her room sitting at the edge of bed with breakfast tray calling out, Hello, hello, hello. Resident 10's fingernails were observed to be long and with gray debris under the nails. Resident 10's right forefinger nail was observed to be jagged. Resident 10 stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure intake and output (I & O- the measurement of the fluids that enter the body and the fluids that leave the body) was documented and monitored for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 68). This failure placed Resident 68 at risk for edema (swelling), retaining fluid in the lungs or dehydration (loss of body fluids).Findings: According to the admission Record, Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Congestive Heart Failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently) and Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder that worsens over time). During a review of Resident 68's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 8/29/25, Resident 68 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) of 9 which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $948K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA