Emmanuel Care Center - Travis
1244 Travis Blvd, Fairfield, CA 94533 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (209) 406-6610 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Staffing
CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 8) when:Resident 1's blood pressure medication was administered without parameters (specific thresholds set by a doctor indicating when to administer or hold medications);Resident 3's hazardous medication (medication that can cause serious health problems requiring special handling to protect healthcare workers, residents, and the environment) was not handled safely during administration;Resident 8's vital signs (measurements of the body's most basic functions) were not taken before administration of blood pressure (BP) medications;Resident 8's blood pressure medication was administered outside the physician-ordered hold parameters;Resident 8's evening medications were not administered as ordered; and,Resident 8's elbow splint was not applied as ordered by the physician.These failures resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 8 receiving antihypertensive medication outside physician's hold parameters…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate hydration and nutrition was provided for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 4) when:Resident 1's fluid restriction (FR- limiting daily intake of all liquids often due to kidney or heart conditions) order was not followed; andResident 4's weight refusals were not documented. These failures increased the potential for Resident 1 to experience fluid overload and for Resident 4 to have significant weight changes. 1.A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD- irreversible kidney failure), dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney (s) have failed), attention to gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a system to ensure the safe and secure disposal and reconciliation for controlled substances (medications with a high potential for abuse and addiction) in accordance with federal and state regulations when:1. The consultant pharmacist was not present on site to witness the disposal of controlled substances for the month of [DATE].2. Controlled substance medications were not accurately accounted for on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an accountability record) for one of two randomly selected residents (Resident 4).These failures resulted in an increased risk for controlled substance medication loss, misuse, and potential harm to residents.1. During an interview and record review on [DATE] at 8:40 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON described the facility's process for controlled substance destruction. She stated that when a resident's-controlled substance medications are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with industry standards when:Food was labeled inconsistently,The can opener tip was chipped but still in use, and The blue cutting board was deeply gouged. These failures had the potential of leading to cross contamination of the 6 residents eating facility prepared meals. 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 12/2/25 at 8:50 a.m. in the dry storage area, containers of bulk food items were stored in large plastic containers. One such container held long grain rice that lacked a received date or an opened date, but indicated a use by date of 5/22/35. Another container which held barley, also lacked a received date or an opened date, but indicated a use-by date of 12-6-35. During a concurrent interview of the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), the DSS concurred that the dates were close to 10 years away and believed they may coincide with the manufacturer's storage guidance but was unable to show the packaging to confirm this.Review of the Dry Goods Storage Guide hanging in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health was provided for one of 8 sampled residents (Resident 8) when podiatry services (services focused on diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of conditions affecting the foot, ankle, and lower leg) were not provided for Resident 8 as ordered by the physician.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 8's decreased overall quality of life and well-being, and the potential for Resident 8 to experience discomfort.Findings:During a review of Resident 8's admission records, the records indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular disease (conditions that affect the blood vessels and blood flow to the brain), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen use was documented consistently for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 3).This failure had the potential to not accurately assess Resident 3's need and response to oxygen therapy. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) following cerebral infarction (brain stroke- loss of blood flow to a part of the brain) affecting right dominant side, and gastrostomy status (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems).A review of Resident 3's physician order dated 10/8/25 indicated an order for oxygen at 2 liters (L- unit of measurement) per minute via nasal cannula (a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) as needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate pain management for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 4) when Resident 4's pain level per pain scale assessment (a numerical system used to gauge a resident's pain intensity, where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst possible pain) did not correlate with pain medication provided. This failure had the potential for Resident 4's pain to not be treated effectively. A review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with multiple diagnoses including chronic venous insufficiency (valves in the leg veins are weak causing blood to pool in the legs), spinal stenosis in the lumbar region (narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower back that compressed nerves causing pain, weakness, or numbness in the legs and buttocks), and osteoarthritis (cartilage in joints is worn down causing bones to rub against each other causing pain and stiffness) of the left knee, ankle, and foot. A review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated assessment tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy recommendation was implemented for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 1) when the site of the insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) injection was not documented.This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to receive insulin injections on the same site and for Resident 1 to develop thickened skin affecting insulin absorption. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD- irreversible kidney failure), dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney (s) have failed), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM- disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).A review of Resident 1's physician orders indicated Humalog injection as per sliding scale (a rapid-acting insulin is adjusted based on the current blood sugar level)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 3) was free of a significant medication error when staff did not flush the resident's gastrostomy tube (aka G-tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition and medications directly to the stomach) as ordered by the physician and in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure. This failure resulted in the potential for tube clogging, which may disrupt the delivery of medication and nutrition, increasing the risk for complications such as dehydration, undernourishment and harm to the resident. During a medication observation on 12/3/25 at 8:52 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) 4 was observed preparing seven medication preparations for Resident 3 including four oral tablets, two liquid medications and one liquid nutritional supplement. LN 4 crushed each medication tablet, placed the contents in separate medication cups and diluted them. Then, she prepared the liquid formulations into separate medication cups. Afterwards she brought the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a prepared medication was not returned to the medication cart for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 8).This practice resulted in prepared, unsealed, unlabeled medication being available for use, creating a risk for medication error and the potential for resident harm.During a medication pass observation with Licensed Nurse (LN 1) on 12/2/25 at 1:10 p.m., at the medication cart, LN 1 retrieved Resident 8's dose of hydralazine 50 mg (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) from a sealed, pharmacy-supplied blister pack. She popped the tablet into a medication cup, placed it in a plastic bag to crush it, then returned the crushed medication to the cup and mixed it with applesauce.LN 1 entered Resident 8's room and explained the medication was for hypertension (high blood pressure). The resident refused the medication despite several offers.On 12/2/25 at 1:21 p.m., LN 1 returned to the medication cart and stated that the resident refused [the medication]. She then labeled the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care between the hospice team (care designed to provide supportive care for physical, psychological, spiritual, and emotional needs to a terminally ill resident) and the facility for one of 8 sampled residents (Resident 6), when the resident's clinical records did not include hospice documents. This failure placed Resident 6 at risk for not receiving services necessary to promote comfort and quality of life. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 6 in early 2025 with multiple diagnoses which included end stage heart failure (a condition when the heart becomes weaker and it's too weak to pump blood through the body effectively causing severe fatigue and shortness of breath). A review of Resident 6's clinical records contained a physician order dated 3/19/2025, which indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the hospice services. A review of Resident 6's electronic records and a Hospice Binder located at the nursing station was conducted on 12/3/25 at 12:15 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure performance improvement projects (PIP) were developed when high risk or problem-prone areas in the facility were not identified for a census of 8.This failure decreased the facility's potential to correct systemic issues that can affect residents' health and safety.Findings:During an interview on 12/4/25 at 4:24 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated that during the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI, a systematic approach to improving the quality of care and resident life in healthcare settings) meetings, the QAPI members present and discussed the most pressing issues within the facility. The ADM stated the QAPI team identified high risk and problem-prone areas including kitchen management during their monthly meetings. The ADM acknowledged that no PIPs were conducted to address the identified issues and stated, we could have picked a lot of projects to do the PIP. The ADM further stated that the QAPI team should have created a PIP based on the issues discussed during the QAPI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE MESA, WILLY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| DEMESA, PRAXEDES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 88% | since 01/01/2025 |
| DEMESA, WILLIAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| DIZON, GILDA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| GALLARDE, MONITA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| LINAYAO, OLIVIA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2025 |
| BAUTISTA, RICARDO | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| DHUGGA, GURPREET | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| CAMPANALE SISTERS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/02/2006 |
| MURRAY, EDNA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/02/2006 |
| ZIMMERMAN, RICHARD | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/02/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555938. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.