Mayers Memorial Hospital
43563 Hwy 299 E, Fall River Mills, CA 96028 · Government - Hospital district · 99 certified beds · (530) 336-5511 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $62,258 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-20)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (64%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.27 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.13 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 69.0 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.07 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.26 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff had the knowledge and resources (cleaning supplies or cleaning materials), required to provide a safe and sanitary environment which promoted the prevention of the spread of infections when 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2) had C-Diff infections, (C-Diff, a highly contagious bacteria in the intestines that could cause severe diarrhea, inflammation of the colon, abdominal discomfort, lack of appetite, weight loss, isolation, extended hospital stays, and/or death) and resided in a locked memory care unit for dementia (an enclosed living space for residents with dementia, a disease that caused an inability to think, reason, or remember) and; 1. Licensed Nurses (LN) and Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) used cleansing wipes, with the brand name of, CaviWipes 1 to disinfect (cleaning with a chemical liquid that destroyed bacteria) on objects that were used for resident care on infected and non-infected residents as well…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure appropriate discharge (the safe release of a patient from a hospital, or medical facility when they are medically stable, able to manage self-care, or have arranged support) for one of two residents sampled (Resident 1) when:1. Resident 1 was transferred out of the skilled nursing facility (SNF - are places for people to live temporarily or permanently while they are getting rehabilitation and medical treatments after hospitalization for an illness or injury) to the acute care hospital (a healthcare facility where patients are treated for brief but severe episodes of illness or injury) due to a medical emergency and did not receive information regarding a 7-day bed hold form (a document that is signed by the resident or their representative which validates the resident's or their representative's agreement to the facility holding or reserving the resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 17 and 19) were treated with dignity and respect when the facility did not have portable oxygen tanks (can be taken anywhere) available and the residents had no choice but to use oxygen concentrators (a large, noisy, and not portable machine that requires electricity).This failure resulted in preventing Resident 2 and 7 from going anywhere there was not an electrical outlet, such outdoors, to appointments and out on pass with their family. This caused Resident 2 and 7 to feel embarrassed, confined, angry and anxious, which resulted in mental aguish and loss of dignity. During a record review of Facility's Resident Rights, undated, the resident's rights indicated, The resident has the right.(11) To be treated with consideration, respect and full recognition of dignity and individuality.A review of Resident 17's medical record indicated that Resident 17 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment when 6 out of 8 resident bathrooms observed were found to have unsanitary conditions around the toilets and floors.This was unsightly with the potential to cause health issues due to bacteria and cause the residents psychological stress and depression.During a review of the facility’s, “Resident [NAME] of Rights”, undated, the [NAME] of Rights indicated, (e ) The facility shall be clean, sanitary, and in good repair at all times.” During an observation and interview on 8/5/25 at 3:30 pm, while in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] with Family Member (FM) H. FM H stated, “Have you looked at the bathroom? It is disgusting.” Resident restroom [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have a gap around the toilet base and the linoleum where the caulking (a waterproof filler or sealant used to seal cracks or gaps to prevent buildup and water damage), was torn and missing, grime had collected in the gap resulting in discolored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to meet this requirement when three of five sampled residents (Residents 3, 5, and 29) with dementia (a brain problem that affects memory and behavior), received antipsychotic medications (drugs that regulate or control thinking and behaviors) without an adequate indication for use (target symptom or behavior) when: 1. Specific, measurable, behaviors that are not subjective;2. Non-pharmacologic (non- drug) interventions were tried to address residents' behaviors prior to administering antipsychotic agents, and;3. A physician's response to the pharmacist's recommendations for use of these medications was not done. These failures had the potential for unwanted and adverse medication side effects including; motor and sensory instability (unreliable thinking and ability to move), dizziness, drowsiness, increased risk of falls and fractures, and death caused by heart problems. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents with Dementia Antipsychotic Medication indicated: 1a.: The physician in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were maintained for a census of 69 when the controlled drug (medication that may be abused or cause addiction) record form was not filled out and signed accurately. This failure could result in diversion of the residents' unused controlled medications.During an inspection of the controlled medication bin located in the medication room on 8/4/25 at 1:22 p.m., the controlled medication bin was observed to be locked and sealed with a numbered zip tie, 9973377, which was different than the recorded tag number, 9973375, on the controlled count sheet.During an interview on 8/4/25 at 1:25 p.m. with Charged Nurse (CN) A, CN A confirmed that the number stated on the numbered zip tie was not the same as the number recorded and signed by her on the controlled count sheet. CN A acknowledged it was a mistake.During an interview on 8/4/25 at 1:32 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated, I see the potential that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This regulation was not met when pharmacy recommendations were not followed or responded to by the Physician, Director of Nursing or nursing staff for three of six sampled residents (Residents 3 ,5, and 29), for periods of up to six months (120 days).This had the potential for residents to remain on unnecessary medication and potentially exposing them to unnecessary unwanted and adverse side effects of those medications, which included falls, confusion and death by heart related problems. Findings: Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents with Dementia Antipsychotic Medication, dated 6/18/24, indicated, Whenever there is a change in the resident's medical condition or medical status, the consultant pharmacy, at the bequest of the facility, will review the resident's current medications. The consultant pharmacist will then recommend to the physician any specific dose reductions, additions/changes, and or discontinuations, based on need, labs, and the current dose. The physician will review the dosage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication rate did not exceed 5% for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 40 and 4).1. For Resident 40, a licensed nurse was unable to administer Resident's 40's doxycycline, a medication to treat and prevent infections, with the rest of resident's morning medications when doxycycline was not available to be administered per Physician Orders.2. For Resident 4, a licensed nurse did not administer Resident 4's omeprazole, a medication to treat certain conditions where there is too much acid in the stomach, as ordered by the physician.As a result, 2 errors were identified out of 31 opportunities for error during the observation of medication administration; the facility medication error was 6.45%.1. During an observation of medication administration on 8/5/25 at 7:05 a.m., Licensed Nurse (LN) B was observed to prepare and administer Resident 40's morning medications which did not include Resident 40's doxycycline. During an interview on 8/5/25 at 7:10 a.m. with LN B, LN B stated, doxycycline was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored correctly, when:1. An expired 3 ml (milliliter, unit of measure) insulin lispro pen, medication used to treat high blood sugar levels, was found in the medication cart. 2. An expired 5 ml multidose vials of Tuberculin purified protein derivative testing agent, a solution used in a skin test to diagnose latent lung infection, was found in the medication room B's refrigerator. These failures had the potential for medication error, misuse, or administering expired and ineffective medications to the residents.1. During an inspection of medication cart Hall #2 with Licensed Nurse (LN) A on 8/4/25 at 1:19 p.m., an expired insulin lispro pen was found with an expiration date of 7/22/25 on the label. During an interview on 8/4/25 at 1:20 p.m. with LN A , LN A acknowledged that the insulin pen was expired and needed to be removed from the refrigerator. LN A stated, “expired medications will have reduced efficacy.” During a review of insulin lispro’s Provider Information (PI), last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were followed when a blood pressure monitor (device used to measure blood pressure) was not disinfected according to manufacturer's instructions after being used during medication pass observation. This failure had the potential to transmit blood-borne pathogens or bodily fluids between residents.During a medication pass observation with Licensed Nurse (LN) A on 8/5/25 at 8:30 a.m., LN A used a blood pressure monitor to measure Resident 40's blood pressure inside the resident's room. The blood pressure monitor was then taken out of resident room's and placed on the medication cart without being cleaned and disinfected.During a medication pass observation with LN A on 8/5/25 at 7:28 a.m., LN A used the same blood pressure monitor to measure Resident 13's blood pressure inside the resident's room. The blood pressure monitor was then taken out of resident's room and placed on the medication cart without being cleaned and disinfected.During a medication pass…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, facility policy review and video surveillance review, the facility failed to ensure that the pharmacist was responsible for establishing a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled medications (medications that have a high potential for abuse and addiction) in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation, and to ensure that these drugs were handled and administered in a safe and secure manner. This failure allowed narcotic medications to be diverted (stolen or misused) without detection, compromising the facility's ability to ensure the safe and effective use of medications. Residents were placed at potential risk of unrelieved pain, undertreatment, and harm from diverted medications. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substance Storage, Receiving, Tracking and Documenting dated 6/25/09, indicated, Receiving and tracking of controlled substances is done in a consistent manner to prevent and detect diversion. An interview with the Director of Nurses (DON) and Director of Safety and Security…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care planned fall prevention interventions (a set of proactive measures designed to minimize the risk of falls in individuals) for 2 of 4 residents sampled for falls who had been identified as high risk for falls (Resident 1 and 2) when: 1. Resident 1's care planned intervention for staff to follow Resident 1 to his room and assist him with toileting or lying down was not followed. 2. Resident 2's care planned intervention to ensure that Resident 2 was wearing non-skid socks or footwear was not followed. These failures resulted in avoidable falls with broken hips for both Resident 1 and 2 which and rehospitalizations for surgical repairs. This had the potential to negatively impact the residents' physical and emotional well-being and subject them to further falls with injuries. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, FALLS-SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) dated 5/22/23, indicated that a fall is an unplanned descent to the floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent physical and verbal abuse for two of six sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 4) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A was rough with Resident 3 and CNA H cursed and threw personal care items toward Resident 4. These failures violated Resident's 3 and 4's right to be free from abuse and caused Resident 4 to fear CNA H. These failures and had the potential to subject residents to physical harm, mistreatment and negatively impact their emotional and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of the facility ' s policy and procedure titled, Abuse, Resident dated 3/2/2023 indicated that the facility, .ensure that each patient has the right to be free from abuse (verbal, sexual, physical and mental) and The facility prohibits mistreatment . Review of admission records for Resident 3 indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory and ability to make sound decisions), chronic pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation of an allegation of staff to resident abuse was conducted for one of six sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure had the potential to put all residents of the facility at risk for staff to resident abuse. Findings: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Resident dated 3/2/2023 indicated that, 5. a) The facility will investigate all suspected incidents .i) Obtain written statements by all persons involved while facts are fresh in their minds. Review of a facility policy titled, Guidelines for Conducting Investigation Accidents/Incidents dated 10/8/2019, indicated that, 1. The Licensed Nurse on duty at the time an accident or incident occurs will .a. i. Conduct staff/resident interviews. Review of Resident 3 ' s Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS an assessment tool) dated 1/30/25, reflected that Resident 3 scored 3 out of 15 possible points on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment of memory and decision-making skills), which indicated severely impaired cognition. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident 4 was monitored specifically for any problems resulting from the abuse he experienced when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) H was rough with Resident 4 and threw personal care items at him on 1/10/25, when they did not complete change in condition charting (documentation done just after an unexpected incident occurs that had a negative effect on a resident to communicate the resident's condition to other healthcare providers), and alert charting (ongoing documentation of monitoring for 72 hours after an accident, injury, or incident to reassess if any problems occurred over time resulting from the accident, injury, incident), was initiated late. These failures had the potential for staff to not be fully informed and intervene if Resident 4's mental and medical status declined which could result in delays in care and a decline in Resident 4's physical and emotional well-being. Findings: Review of a facility policy titled, Charting and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure their abuse reporting policy was followed for six of 14 residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, and Resident 6) sampled for abuse when: 1. Resident 1 had an altercation with Resident 6 and the follow-up investigation was not sent to California Department of Health (CDPH) as per facility policy. 2. Resident 4 was accused of an altercation with Resident 3 and Resident 5 and the follow-up investigation was not sent to the CDPH as per facility policy. 3. Resident 2's family member (FM) was accused of verbally abusing Resident 2 and the facility did not report the alleged abuse to the CDPH withing 24 hours per facility policy. This failure had the potential to subject residents to mistreatment, neglect or abuse. Findings: 1.A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Abuse, Resident revised 3/2/23, indicated Results of investigation are reported to, with documentation of dates and times, as appropriate .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent verbal abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Registered Nurse (RN) A yelled and cursed at Resident 1 and told Resident 1 to not use her call light. This mistreatment caused Resident 1 distress and feelings that her needs were not met and had the potential to affect all residents under the care of RN A and negatively impact their quality of life and emotional well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Abuse, Resident dated 3/23/2023, indicated that the facility .ensure that each patient has the right to be free from abuse (verbal, sexual, physical and mental) and The facility prohibits mistreatment . Review of admission records for Resident 1, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), Age related cognitive decline (difficulty thinking and making…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure five of seven sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) were free from verbal abuse when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 verbally abused Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5's sense of security, increased loss of dignity, and humiliation and emotional, and psychological well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (memory loss), anxiety (fear of the unknown), Spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal canal in the lower part of your back), and high blood pressure. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized resident assessment) dated 3/27/24, indicated, Resident 1 was cognitively intact (able to think and reason). During an interview on 5/24/24, at 9:30 a.m., with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated, I have a hard time sitting up due to pain. CNA 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), sampled for unsafe wandering (a random, aimless or repetitive search for an exit that is non-goal-directed), and elopement (a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without the facility's knowledge and supervision) was assessed and monitored for unsafe wandering and elopement. Resident 1 and Resident 2 eloped from the facility and had no wander/elopement risk assessments at the time of their elopements. These failures resulted in Resident 1 eloping from the facility from an unknown exit at an unknown time and being found in the facility ' s parking lot by a staff member who happened to go out to the parking lot. And Resident 2 eloping from the facility and being found by law enforcement at a gas station four-tenths of a mile away, in the middle of the night. Findings: A review of the facility ' s policy titled, Elopement Policy, dated 5/8/24, indicated that the facility must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the required daily Registered Nursing (RN) hours for Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) staffing information submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Failing to meet the required hours the facility did not ensure an adequate level of staff is working at a given time, potentially leading to inadequate care of residents and adverse clinical outcomes. FINDINGS During a concurrent record review and interview on 05/09/24 at 12:33 PM, the Quality Manager (QM) confirmed the required RN coverage was not met for 20 days of the first Federal Quarter of 2024 (The first Federal Fiscal Quarter begins October 1st of the prior year, in this case, October 1st, 2023). The QM stated, It is all here and matches the PBJ report on these dates. We did not have an RN present on the schedule. We do have them in other roles and we encourage them to clock in when they are giving resident care. Referring to the XML template (computer staffing sheet) the QM stated, It is the 7 group (designation) only which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed report abuse allegations on 4/8/24 and unknown date for Resident 10 and reported late for Resident 50 and 278 when: 1. One of three sampled residents (Resident 10) was verbally and physically abused. 2. Two of three sampled residents (Resident 50 and 278) were reported late. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Resident, dated 7/15/2022, included the following statement, For all intents and purposes, the word patient(s) refers to all customers receiving health care services in our facilities, including inpatients, outpatients, residents, and clients, the P&P indicated, each patient has the right to be free from abuse (verbal, sexual, physical and mental) including corporal punishment and isolation. Patients must not be subjected to any of the above by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other patients, consultants, volunteers, and other agencies that service the patient, family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the Care Plans for two of four sampled residents (Residents 27 and 128) when information about their risk for elopement (leaving the facility without staff's knowledge) and exit alarm devices was not included in their Care Plans. This failure had the potential to put the residents at risk for accidents related to elopement. Refer to F 689. Findings: A review of Resident 27's clinical record indicated they were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 27's diagnoses included anoxic (lack of oxygen) brain damage and a prior heart attack. Resident 27's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was three, which indicated severe cognitive (intellectual) impairment. A review of Resident 27's physician's orders for May 2024 showed a verbal order entered on 12/9/23 for, Wander guard (a device that emitted an audible alarm when the resident approached an exit) applied to left ankle for safety Change Q (every) 90 days every shift for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to make sure the environment was free of all accident hazards for two of four sampled residents (Residents 27 and 128) when they had orders for Wanderguard ® (a device worn on the body that caused an alarm to sound at exit doors) placement, with no follow-up or monitoring. This failure had the potential to put the residents at risk for accidents related to elopement (leaving the facility without staff's knowledge). Refer to F 657. Findings: A review of Resident 27's clinical record indicated they were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 27's diagnoses included anoxic (lack of oxygen) brain damage and a prior heart attack. Resident 27's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was three, which indicated severe cognitive (intellectual) impairment. A review of Resident 27's physician's orders for May 2024 showed a verbal order entered on 12/9/23 for, Wander guard applied to left ankle for safety Change Q (every) 90 days every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents sampled for abuse (Resident 10) was free from physical and verbal abuse, when confidential informant (CI1) witnessed the Director of Nursing (DON) yelling at and shaking Resident 10's wheelchair. This failure resulted in physical and verbal abuse to Resident 10 and had the potential for a decline in Resident 10's psychosocial wellbeing and isolation. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Resident, dated 7/15/2022, included the following statement, For all intents and purposes, the word patient(s) refers to all customers receiving health care services in our facilities, including inpatients, outpatients, residents, and clients, the P&P indicated, each patient has the right to be free from abuse (verbal, sexual, physical and mental) including corporal punishment and isolation. Patients must not be subjected to any of the above by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional food safety and sanitation practices were in place when: 1. the interior of the microwave oven was not clean; 2. two expired food items were available for use; 3. one food item was not labeled with a use-by date; 4. one canned item had a dent on its seam. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness for a facility with a census of 79 residents who consumed food prepared in the facility. Findings: A review of The Food Code of the United States Public Health Service, and Food and Drug Administration, dated 2022, indicated the following: 4-602.13 Nonfood-Contact Surfaces. The presence of food debris or dirt on nonfood contact surfaces may provide a suitable environment for the growth of microorganisms (germs) which employees may inadvertently transfer to food. And, The label on packages intended for consumer sale must contain a combination of a sell-by date and use-by instructions which makes it clear that the product must be consumed within the number of days determined to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The following reflects the findings of the California Department of Public Health during an abbreviated standard survey for one facility reported incident. Facility Reported Incident: 867595 The inspection was limited to the specific facility reported incident investigated and does not represent the findings of a full inspection of the facility. Representing the Department: 22705, Health Facilities Evaluator Nurse A deficiency was issued at F 557 for facility reported incident 867595. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to treat one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with dignity and respect, when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A left Resident 1 alone in the dining room, unattended with the lights turned off, after dinner. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling rushed and had the potential to result in a decline in psychosocial well being. Findings: The California Department of Public Health received a report from the facility on 10/27/23, which indicated CNA A left Resident 1 in the dining room, unattended with the lights turned off.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. Six dry storage bins had white and yellow-colored dried sticky substances on the lids and bottom of bins. 2. Five of the kitchen drawers had sawdust particles on the inside corners, six kitchen drawers had yellowish sticky food particles on the inside of the drawers which stored cooking utensils. 3. The kitchen microwave had yellowish food splatter on the inside including the top and both sides. 4. There was a wet dirty blue cloth stored under the cook preparation (prep) sink with visible black colored dirt and grime on the bottom of cabinet and covering the pipes. 5. The cooking utensils had dried food particles. 6. The oven had dried grease and dried food particles on the inside door, around the edges of the oven door, and on top of the oven. 7. Chipped paint on all of the white shelves in the three-door reach in refrigerators were not easily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident grievances and complaints were promptly reviewed, investigated, resolved, and documented for 1 of 26 sampled residents. (Resident 75) This had the potential for quality of care issues and neglect to continue for all residents in the facility, which could lead to negative clinical outcomes. Findings: A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Nursing Homes Residents' Rights, indicated to file a complaint or grievance, You may talk with the Resident Council in your nursing home, you may talk with a staff person you trust, or the facility administrator and talk with the long-term care Ombudsman. A review of the facility's policy dated [DATE] titled, Reporting Concerns, indicated Long Term Care will maintain records in a Concern/Grievance log, and all original documentation will be kept in the Performance Improvement Office, and studied for continuous quality improvement. During a follow up interview on [DATE] at 2:05…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of three sampled residents, (Resident 5 and Resident 182) were free from abuse and neglect when: 1. Resident 5 was verbally abused by her roommate, Resident 7. 2. A Licensed Nurse LN (A) was verbally rude, disrespectful, and did not provide care when requested for Resident 182. This failure caused Resident 7 and Resident 182 increased anxiety, loss of dignity, and humiliation. Findings: A review of the facility's policy revised and approved 3/2/23 titled, Abuse, Resident, indicated verbal abuse is defined as any use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to patients/residents or their families, or within hearing distance, regardless of age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples include but are not limited to threats of harm, saying things to frighten a resident. Mental abuse includes, but is not limited to, humiliation, harassment, threats of punishment or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility staff recognized and reported allegations of abuse for two of two sampled residents (Residents 5 and 7) within two-hours, when resident 7 was verbally abusive and threatened resident 5 on 04/25/23 at 2:38 am, and this was not reported until 05/04/23 at 2:40 pm, 15 days later. This failure had the potential to delay the identification, and implementation of appropriate corrective actions, and placed other facility residents at risk for potential abuse. Findings: During a review of the facility's Competency Course for Education titled, Safeguarding Resident Rights in Nursing Facilities, dated 2022, the Competency Course indicated, You have the ethical and legal responsibility to protect the rights of the people your organization takes care of. A safe environment includes the right for people to be free from abuse and neglect. Every person working in a healthcare organization is responsible for protecting the people in their care from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan for two of two sampled residents (Resident 5 and 7) was revised and updated to reflect an abuse allegation. This failure had the potential for resident's individual care needs to go unrecognized, and a risk for a decline in residents physical, mental, and psychological status. Findings: During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans-SNF dated 06/03/21, the P&P indicated, Licensed staff promptly alerts the physician to any changes that suggest a need to alter the plan of care. Changes in the resident's condition that require a change in the plan of care shall be documented in the resident's clinical record. Licensed staff will review resident care plan with weekly nursing update. Resident 5's record was reviewed. Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, chronic pain, anxiety, shortness of breath, and diabetes. The most recent Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 4 of 26 sampled residents (Residents 75, 77, 181 and 182), received assistance with activities of daily living to attain or maintain their independence when: 1. Routine grooming activities were not completed for Resident 182. 2. Routine and scheduled showers and toileting were not completed for Residents 75, 77, 181 and 182. These failures had the potential to result in residents feeling depressed with poor self-esteem, and had the potential to contribute to skin breakdown, infection, and negatively impact their ability to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being. Findings: A review of a facility policy titled, Quality of Life-Dignity revised August 2009, indicated residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times. Treated with dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem or self-worth. Resident shall be groomed as they wish to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 26 sampled resident's environment was free from accident hazards when the facility equipment was stored in the resident's bedroom and the resident's assistive devices were moved out of her reach. (Resident 182) This failure had the potential to increase Resident 182's risk for fall and injuries and violated her right to have a homelike bedroom environment. Findings: A review of the facility's undated policy titled, Nursing Homes Residents' Rights indicated resident right categories include the following: quality care, quality of life, and living accommodations. Resident 182 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for diagnoses that included vascular dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), history of falling, anxiety, diabetes, chronic pain, and heart disease. During an observation on 5/3/23 at 9:30 am, Resident 182's room was full…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure competent nursing staff when: 1. The facility staff did not understand the different types of resident abuse and the abuse policy process or to whom they should report abuse to. 2. The facility staff did not know how to implement the facility's resident grievance process. 3. The facility staff did not know that translation services were available for residents who did not speak English. 4. Facility staff did not know the process for reporting missed resident showers. This failure to ensure competent staff for facility's abuse process resulted in alleged abuse not being reported to California Department of Public Health (CDPH), the Ombudsman (resident advocacy group) and the Police, and had the potential for grievances to go unresolved and for residents who did not speak English to not have their needs met. Findings: A review of a policy revised and approved [DATE], titled Abuse, Resident, indicated verbal abuse is defined as any use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify the specific needs of and develop individualized plans of care for three of four sampled residents with dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning) in order to promote a high quality of life. (Residents 77, 181 and 182). This has the potential for residents with dementia to have ongoing fear, anxiety, behaviors and injuries due to the facility not recognizing and analyzing interventions tailored to their specific needs and prevent those with dementia from attaining or maintaining their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: According to the Alzheimer's Foundation of America, November 2016, article accessed at: https://www.alzfdn.org/AboutDementia/definition.html), titled, About Dementia, dementia is a general term to describe a group of symptoms related to loss of memory, judgment, language, complex motor skills, and other intellectual function,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-05 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff had appropriate competencies to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services when two quaternary sanitizer (Quat, a solution used to sanitize kitchen work surfaces) buckets had not been changed for day shift, and when tested were not at the required concentration level for effectiveness for sanitizing surfaces in the kitchen. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food) to all residents. Findings: During a record review of the facility's policy dated 4/1/2004 titled, Law and Regulatory Affairs indicated the Oasis Multi-Quat sanitizer is registered with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a food contact surface sanitizer. The product can be used at an active ingredient concentration equal or between 150 and 400 ppm, (parts per million, a unit of measure) on food contact surfaces. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/3/23 at 12:46 pm, the Dietary Manager (DM) checked the Quat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$62,258 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $62,258 — penalty dated 2023-12-20
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-14 for 55 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-17 for 16 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAYERS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 10/02/1969 |
| LAKEY, TRAVIS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/23/2009 |
| HARRIS, RYAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| OVERTON, THERESA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/05/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056416. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.