Folsom Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 245 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 196 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 85.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.87 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Medication storage rooms were kept secure when the automatic closing mechanism failed and the door was unlocked and accessible;2. Two of two medication storage room refrigerators were not monitored according to facility policy and procedure (P&P), and temperatures were not accurately documented;3. Emergency medications were not stored according to manufacturer specifications;4. Medication brought by family for Resident 69 was not labeled in accordance with facility P&P; and5. Medication carts were not kept locked and secure when unattended by nursing staff. These failures had the potential for diversion of medications, residents exposed to medications with unsafe or reduced potency, and incorrect or unsafe administration of medication from the absence of labeling on the container.Findings: 1. During a medication pass (med pass) observation on [DATE] at 8:22 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3), LN 3 was observed preparing two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were followed when: Nursing staff did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while handling hazardous medication (medications that can cause serious effects including cancer, organ toxicity, fertility problems, genetic damage, and birth defects if not handled appropriately). Pain medication was not administered in accordance with the physician's order.An unclear PRN (as need) psychotropic medication order for Resident 11 was not clarified for indication for use prior to administration. These failures had the potential to result in worsening resident health conditions and unwanted exposure to hazardous medications leading to health complications. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 4/21/26 at 7:50 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), LN 2 was observed preparing four medications for Resident 63 including mycophenolate mofetil (a medication to suppress the immune system) 500 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement), two tablets. The pharmacy label…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four out of five sampled employee personnel records included annual performance evaluations (formal, written, mandated processes typically occurring annually and during probationary periods to assess skill, knowledge, and work habits).This failure had the potential to result in poorly trained and managed employees, decreased quality of care provided, and safety risks for a vulnerable population.Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/23/26 at 8:53 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) and the Administrator (Adm), the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) personnel records reviewed did not have a completed Annual Performance Evaluations (APE). The Adm stated the APE's had not been completed in a while. The Adm indicated the performance evaluations have not been on the facility's radar and the employee performance evaluations were not completed as required. The Adm stated the performance evaluations were used to ensure the staff perform up to current laws and regulations and maintain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: Nursing staff disposed of medication that was prepared but not administered in accordance with facility policy and procedure;Medications for destruction were disposed of in a manner that limited potential for diversionEmergency medications (E-kit) were replaced timely for a census of 84;Two of 2 randomly selected medication cart controlled drug sign-in/sign-out sheets (a sheet used to reconcile inventory of controlled medications in the medication cart by the outgoing and incoming nurse during a shift change) were signed by the outgoing and incoming nursing shift. These failures resulted in the facility not having accurate accountability of controlled medications and potential for abuse or misuse of these medications, the potential for emergency medications to be unavailable when needed, and the potential for not meeting the residents' therapeutic needs or worsening of their medical conditions.1. During a medication pass (med pass) observation on 4/21/26 at 8 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), LN 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 7.69% error rate when three medication errors out of 39 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for three of nine Residents (Residents 73, 84, and 103). This failure resulted in medications not given in accordance with the prescriber's order and potential to affect the residents' clinical conditions. 1. During a medication pass (med pass) observation on 4/21/26 at 8:22 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3), LN 3 was observed preparing two medications for Resident 103 including aspirin (a medication to prevent blood clots) EC (enteric coated, a special delayed release coating to prevent stomach irritation) 81 milligrams (mg, a unit of measurement), 1 tablet. A review of Resident 103's physician's orders indicated an order for aspirin delayed release 81 mg, give one tablet by mouth two times a day for VTE (venous thromboembolism, dangerous blood clots that form in the veins) prophylaxis (prevention) for 30 days, dated 4/16/26. LN 3 looked in the medication cart and stated the aspirin was not available for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to implement infection control and prevention practices when:1. Laundry Staff 1 (LS 1) reused a gown after handling soiled linens;2. Incentive spirometers (IS, a handheld device designed to encourage deep breathing) were not labeled for 3 out of 22 sampled residents (Resident 21, Resident 56, Resident 101). These failures increased the potential for the spread of infections among vulnerable residents.Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/23/26 commencing at 9:36 a.m. with LS 1 in the laundry room, LS 1 was observed putting on gown and gloves and sorting soiled linens in separate bins, then LS 1 removed the gown [rolled into a ball] and placed it on the top of the shelf. LS 1 removed washed clothes from two washers and placed them in the dryers. LS 1 walked back to the shelf, took a previously used gown, put it on, put on a new pair of gloves, loaded soiled linens into two washers, and started the washing cycles. LS 1 stated that she reused the same gown throughout her eight (8) hour shift. LS 1 agreed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained prior to the administration of as needed (PRN) lorazepam (a psychotropic medication to treat anxiety) for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 3). This failure increased the potential for Resident 3's Responsible Party (RP) to not be informed of the risks and benefits of the medication and possible alternatives.A review of Resident 3's medical record indicated he was admitted to the facility in October 2025 with diagnoses which included dementia, Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), depression, and anxiety. A review of Resident 3's medical record indicated the following physician's orders for lorazepam:- Lorazepam 0.5 milligram (mg, a unit of measurement): Give 0.5 mg by mouth in the afternoon for anxiety manifested by restlessness related to anxiety disorder, dated 4/22/26- Lorazepam 0.5 mg: Give one tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety manifested by restlessness related to anxiety disorder for 14 days,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement a care plan intervention for the use of eyeglasses for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 8), when Resident 8's glasses were not applied.This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 8's communication needs and quality of life.Findings:A review of Resident 8's admission record indicated she was admitted in Fall 2021 with diagnoses which included a history of bed confinement status (inability to leave the bed due to illness, injury, or severe frailty), bilateral cataracts (where the natural, clear lens inside your eye becomes cloudy or foggy), and Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities).During a review of Resident 8's Care Plan Report (CPR), dated [DATE], the CPR indicated, The resident has impaired visual function, with interventions that included environmental factors and use of glasses for visual support.During a review of Resident 8's Valuable List (VL),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 80), when wheelchair footrests were found in Resident 80's room walking pathway. This failure had the potential risk to result in accidents or injuries of Resident 80. Findings:A review of Resident 80's admission record indicated she was admitted in Spring 2026 with diagnoses which included history of falling, muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility (difficulty walking and moving around), lack of coordination, and osteoporosis (disease that makes bones weak, thin, and brittle, causing them to break easily).A review of Resident 80's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated [DATE], the MDS indicated that Resident 80 had decision-making capacity, at risk for falls, and required a wheelchair, walker, and staff assistance for mobility.A review of Resident 80's Care Plan Report (CPR), dated [DATE], the CPR indicated Resident 80…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 8) remained free from unnecessary medication, when Resident 8 was prescribed and administered with antibiotics (ABX, medications that treat bacterial infections) for prophylactic (preventative medical measure or medication designed to stop a disease, infection, or health condition before it occurs) for a urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in the bladder/urinary tract).This failure had the potential for antibiotic resistance and infection.Findings:A review of Resident 8's admission record indicated she was admitted in Fall 2021 with diagnoses which included history of bed confinement status (inability to leave the bed due to illness, injury, or severe frailty), pressure ulcer (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence), and Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities).A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $915K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA