No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sherwood Oaks Post Acute Care, LLC

130 Dana Street, Fort Bragg, CA 95437 · For profit - Partnership · 79 certified beds · (707) 964-6333 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (707) 964-6333 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 20252 actual-harm citations$87,802 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $87,802 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-06)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
510 Cypress St Ste D · (707) 964-5696 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
150 S Main St · (707) 961-1342 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
171 Boatyard Shopping Center
Park
E Laurel St · (707) 813-0899 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased38.9%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.0%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.1%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms27.4%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.5%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.3%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.0%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.5%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.5%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.9%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission6.5%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.1%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.072.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.731.571.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 101% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.9%CMS range 35.8–63.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 8.0–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified66.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.0–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.481.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.75
RN hours/ resident / day
0.21
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.73
RN hoursweekends
36.4%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 32.3 residents a day — about 41% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-06)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of thirteen sampled residents (Resident 16) received quality nursing care that was resident-centered, based on a comprehensive assessment, and in accordance with her goals of care, as indicated in her Nursing Care Plan (a document that contains essential information about a patient's condition, diagnosis, goals, interventions, and outcomes) when she experienced intermittent constipation (problem passing stool; associated with hardened feces [stool]; generally passing less than three stools per week) from 12/1/25 through 1/3/26, but nursing staff: 1. Did not treat her constipation with PRN (given as needed or requested) medication ordered by her physician; 2. Did not notify her physician when she was constipated despite receiving her regularly scheduled medication for constipation; and 3. Did not perform weekly nursing assessments (systematic, continuous collection of data to create a patient-centered care plan) after 8/31/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent one of two sampled residents (Resident 3) from an avoidable fall, when Resident 3, assessed as high risk for falls, was found on the floor by the bathroom after she had attempted to transfer and ambulate without one staff assistance and supervision to prevent falls. This failure resulted in Resident 3 sustaining a left femoral neck fracture (left hip fracture) that required surgical repair placing Resident 3 at risk for surgical complications including pain, infection, and decreased mobility. Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following intracranial bleed (bleeding in the brain), schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), heart failure (heart disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff possessed required competencies (a combination of skills, knowledge, abilities, and behaviors that an individual needs to perform a job successfully) and certifications (an official document awarded by a professional organization verifying an individual's specific knowledge/skills required for a job) when the acting Dietary Manager (Manager J) was not certified to function in that position and did not have documented competencies of a Dietary Manager located in their employee file.These failures potentially prevented dietary staff from providing nourishing, palatable, and well-balanced diets that meet the daily nutritional and special dietary needs of residents.During an interview on 3/03/2026 at 11 a.m., Manager J stated he had been the Dietary Manager for two years.During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/05/2026 at 2:30 p.m., Dietary Consultant K reviewed the prior Registered Dietitian's (RD Q) kitchen inspection documentation titled, Sanitation and Food Safety Checklist, subtitled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention measures were implemented for a census of 32 when: 1. Enhanced [NAME] Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs] in nursing homes) were not implemented for three of 15 sampled residents (Resident 4, Resident 29, and Resident 35) with an indwelling medical device. Resident 4 with a central venous catheter (long, flexible tube inserted into a large vein and threaded to the heart for long-term delivery of medication, fluids, blood products, or nutrition), Resident 29 with a urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder used to drain urine), and Resident 35 with a suprapubic catheter (SP, a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder through a small abdominal incision used to drain urine). Effective 4/01/24, the Centers for Medicare Services mandated EBP, requiring gowns and gloves for high-contact care activities for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ an Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN, a nurse who helps prevent and identify the spread of infectious disease in the healthcare environment) from early 10/2026 through 3/06/26, leading to Enhanced [NAME] Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs, bacteria and other germs resistant to three or more classes of antibiotics, making infections difficult to treat and highly contagious] in nursing homes) not being implemented for residents with indwelling medical devices including central venous catheters (long, flexible tube inserted into a large vein and threaded to the heart for long-term delivery of medication, fluids, blood products, or nutrition), urinary catheters (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder used to drain urine), and suprapubic catheters (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder through a small abdominal incision used to drain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-06 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three dryers' lint traps located in the laundry room were cleaned out after two uses per the facility's policy.This failure resulted in dryer lint traps accumulating lint, thereby presenting a potential fire risk and creating a hazardous environment for residents, staff, and visitors.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/06/26 at 10:48 a.m. with Laundry Staff C with the help of translator CNA D, in the laundry room, all three dryer lint trap screens were full and there were no logs to indicate how often the lint traps were being cleaned. Laundry Staff C stated she had already dried four loads of laundry in each dryer. Laundry Staff C stated she cleaned the dryer lint traps twice a day. Laundry Staff C stated she was just about to clean the lint out of the dryer lint traps and she would clean the lint traps one more time before leaving, which was around 3:30 - 4 p.m. Laundry Staff C stated the number of loads of clothes/linen she dried per day was based on the census. Laundry Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals safely for a census of 32 residents when a medication cart and a treatment cart were left unlocked and unattended in the facility's lounge room, accessible to residents. Additionally, a second medication cart was observed locked in a hallway outside residents' rooms, with its keys left unattended on top of the cart.These failures could have resulted in unauthorized access to medications by residents leading to accidental ingestion of medications, risk of injuries, contaminated medications, and theft or misuse of controlled substances by residents and staff.During an observation on 3/04/26 at 7:14 a.m., Licensed Nurse L (LN L) was seen preparing morning medications at medication cart #1, in a lounge area containing a total of two medication carts and a treatment cart. The Director of Nursing (DON) entered the room, unlocked medication cart #2, placed some medications inside, and walked out without locking cart #2 again. LN L then locked cart #1 and walked out of the room as well. All…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a manner to maintain nutritive value and palatability (food that has a pleasant, agreeable taste and is enjoyable to eat ) for four of thirteen sampled residents (Resident 4, Resident 35, Resident 5, and Resident 27), in a census of 34, when vegetables were cooked for approximately one hour and held on a steam table (box-like table where food is kept warm by steam or hot water circulating beneath) for approximately one additional hour.These failures caused Resident 4 and Resident 35 to feel unhappy, Resident 5 to decrease her food intake and potentially lose weight, Resident 27 to experience diarrhea, and potentially decreased the nutritive value and palatability of foods being served, thereby negatively impacting heath status and quality of life for residents. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/03/26 at 11:10 a.m., [NAME] H identified the food items located in the steam table as meat and vegetable lasagna prepared that day, green beans, mashed potatoes and gravy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-06 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility Quality Assurance Performance Improvement/Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAPI/QAA, a program that involves a systematic approach to quality assurance and performance improvement designed to identify areas of improvement and develop strategies to improve the quality of care provided to the residents) program failed to identify system-wide problems to correct quality deficiencies when:Since 10/26 through 3/06/26 (see Cross Reference F880 and F882), the facility had not employed an Infection Prevention Nurse (IPN), responsible for overseeing potential infection risks, safeguarding residents' health, and providing staff education on infection prevention measures,2. Enhanced [NAME] Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs] in nursing homes) were not implemented for three of 15 sampled residents (4, 29, and 35) who had indwelling medical devices (instruments placed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-06 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to comply with its Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI, the process that will guide the nursing home's efforts in assuring care and services are continually improved upon) program by not having the mandated Infection Preventionist (IP, a licensed nurse responsible for designing, implementing, and managing programs that prevent the spread of infections within health care facilities) preset at the recert quarterly meeting, thereby, not meeting the required membership for the program.This failure could have resulted in the facility's inability to identify critical infection control issues, develop appropriate corrective plans, implement those strategies and monitor their effectiveness, all of which had the potential to negatively impact resident health and overall outcomes.Findings:During an interview on 3/05/26 at 4 :50 p.m., the Administrator (Adm.) stated the facility did not have an IP.During an interview on 3/06/26 at 9:15 a.m., the Adm. stated there had not been an IP in the facility since 10/2025. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain signed consents for two of two sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 4), who were routinely administered psychotropic medications (also called antipsychotic medications used to treat mental health disorders), when:1. Resident 2's Seroquel (medication used to manage behavioral symptoms like agitation, aggression, or hallucinations [false perception of objects or events involving the senses]) dose went from 25 milligrams (mg) to 50 mg in the morning and 75 mg to 100 mg in the evening without Resident 2's consent, and;2. Resident 4 received trazodone (an anti-depressant used off-label for sleeplessness) to treat insomnia prior to her Responsible Party (RP, and individual designated to make certain decisions for a nursing home resident) giving written informed consent.These failures may have resulted in RPs receiving insufficient information regarding the significant risks associated with these antipsychotics, such as increased mortality among…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans for one of six sampled residents (Resident 4), who suffered insomnia (inability to sleep) and was being administered an antipsychotic medication (a medication to treat mental illness and used off-label for insomnia symptoms) which required closed monitoring.These findings had the potential to result in increased physical and psychological symptoms associated with insomnia, and inability to track or monitor possible harmful side effects of antipsychotics. A review of Resident 4's admission Record (facility demographic), dated 3/03/26, indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (a condition where blood supply to part of the brain is blocked or reduced), borderline personality disorder (characterized by long-term instability in emotions, behavior, relationships, and self-image), and circadian rhythm sleep disorder (sleep disruptions occurring when the internal body clock…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of six sampled residents (Resident 5) addressing weight refusals within seven days of a resident assessment indicating this issue.This failure could have resulted in the inability for staff to identify underlying reasons for weight refusals, offer alternatives, and mitigate health risks related to weight fluctuations. This oversight could have resulted in missed detection of nutritional decline for Resident 5, potentially leading to significant clinical complications. A review of Resident 5's admission Record (a facility demographic), dated 3/03/26, indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, severe protein-calorie malnutrition (a life-threatening deficiency of protein, carbohydrates, and fats resulting in severe muscle wasting, fat loss, or extreme fluid retention), anemia (when low red blood cell levels reduce oxygen transport to tissues, causing fatigue,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the side effects of a psychotropic medication (a medication that influences brain chemistry to help treat mental health conditions by affecting mood, thoughts, behaviors, and perceptions. These types of medications may be hazardous because they carry a significant risk of severe side effects) for one of six residents (Resident 4) despite recommendations from a pharmacist and a subsequent review by the facility physician.This finding had the potential to result in inability for staff to identify significant side effects of the medication which could have resulted in serious harm for Resident 4. A review of Resident 4's admission Record (a facility demographic) indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (condition where the blood supply to part of the brain is blocked or reduced), borderline personality disorder (characterized by long-term instability in emotions, behavior,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a clean and sanitary condition for a census of 31 residents when food debris and dried liquids were present on the floor in food preparation and dishwashing areas, and a dust-covered fan was blowing onto clean utensils.This failure increased the risk of food contamination, pest attraction, and food borne illnesses for the residents of the facility.During an observation of the kitchen on 2/05/26 at 10:29 a.m., dried liquids were noted on the floor in front of the refrigerator. The floor under the refrigerators and the stove and along the baseboards was visibly soiled with food crumbs and dried food debris. The debris extended along the wall-floor seam into multiple areas. In the dish room area of the kitchen, a fan with a buildup of dark-colored dust was blowing onto clean utensils and other clean dishes on the clean side of the dishwasher deck.During a concurrent observation and interview in the kitchen on 2/05/26 at 12:30 p.m. with the Dietary Manager, the surveyor showed him the food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from abuse when Resident 2 placed Resident 1's hand on her genital area without Resident 1's consent. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing emotional distress. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with multiple diagnoses including wedge compression fracture of lumbar vertebra (fracture of the spinal column, lower back, caused by the front of the vertebra collapsing), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and metabolic encephalopathy (brain does not function properly due to an imbalance in the body's metabolism). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 7/20/24, indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) score of 0 out of 15 that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Department a written report of the results of an abuse investigation within 5 working days of an incident that involved an abuse allegation of inappropriate touching for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure had the potential to delay the Department's investigation of abuse allegations which may have led to continued abuse. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with multiple diagnoses including wedge compression fracture of lumbar vertebra (fracture of the spinal column, lower back, caused by the front of the vertebra collapsing), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and metabolic encephalopathy (brain does not function properly due to an imbalance in the body's metabolism). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated assessment tool), Cognitive Patterns, dated 7/20/24, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse when Resident 1 hit with her fist Resident 2's thigh while they were seated close to each other. This failure caused pain and potential mental anguish to Resident 2. Findings: A review of Resident 1's medical records indicated the following: - The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated clinical assessment) dated 9/23/24 indicated Resident 1 had severe memory issues. - The MDS further indicated Resident 1 had delusions (misconceptions or beliefs that are firmly held, contrary to reality) and exhibited verbal behavior symptoms directed towards others such as threatening, screaming, and cursing at others; - Resident 1's order summary report for 12/2024 indicated she was receiving Quetiapine Fumarate (an antipsychotic - medications used to treat several kinds of mental health conditions to regulate your mood, behaviors and thoughts) 50 milligram (mg, unit of measure) tablet in the afternoon and 25 mg in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged resident abuse immediately when Resident 1 allegedly hit Resident 2 who was sitting near and opposite her. This failure reduced the faciltiy's potential to ensure resident safety. Findings: A review of facility Transmission Verification report sent 11/11/24 at 4:52 p.m. and received by the Department on 11/12/24 at 8:00 a.m., indicated an allegation of suspected dependent adult/elder abuse had been made related to a resident-to-resident altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 2. A review of the Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse (documenting a report of abuse or neglect of an elder or dependent adult) between Resident 1 and Resident 2, indicated the incident happened on 11/10/24, at 4:18 p.m. During a review of record and concurrent interview on 12/23/24 at 11:45 a.m., the facility's abuse prevention policy did not indicate a timeframe for reporting suspected abuse incidents. The DON stated they follow the flowchart of Mandated Reporter (attached in facility documents) posted on his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon interview and record review the facility failed to have a dedicated full time Director of Nursing. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for a multi-faceted role of Director of nursing, charge nurse and MDS (Minimum Data Set, a clinical assessment of the resident's functional capabilities and helps staff identify health problems) coordinator whereby the residents were not given the appropriate oversight by a dedicated Director of Nursing. Findings: During an interview on 2/15/24 at 11:05 a.m., Director of Nursing (DON) indicated he was currently the DON, MDS coordinator and floor nurse who administers medications among other duties. During an interview on 2/15/24 at 12:10 p.m., with Director of Staff Development (DSD), DSD indicated DON worked the medication cart passing medication or administering medications to residents every day, (Monday to Friday) DSD indicated the days she would come to work, she would pass medications for DON so he may focus on other duties. DSD indicated if there were issues with the licensed and unlicensed staff then the DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-24 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure they were electronically submitting Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, a system that facilitate the submission of staffing information) data as required every quarter when the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reporting system (CASPER, an assortment of real-time data that allows skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) the opportunity to pinpoint areas where changes in care and operations are necessary to improve performance) report indicated there was no information for the first quarter (Q1 1/2024 up to 3/2024). Findings: During an interview on 5/22/24 at 10:00 a.m., the Administrator Assistant (AA) stated she did not know how to submit report for PBJ. The AA stated another staff from their sister facility submits the facility's PBJ information to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, works in partnership with the entire health care community to improve quality, equity and outcomes in the health care system). During an interview on 5/22/24 at 3:04 p.m., the Administrator stated PBJ staffing information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and facility document review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI, a data driven and proactive approach to quality improvement. It combines two approaches - Quality Assurance (QA) and Performance Improvement (PI). QA is a process used to ensure services are meeting quality standards and assuring care reaches a certain level.) failed to identify quality deficiencies as evidenced by: 1) One sampled resident (Resident 12) self-administered and stored his medications in his room. 2) lack of management oversight that resulted in missing narcotics. There was no investigation or report made to the appropriate agencies until one of the surveyors discovered this deficient practice. 3) lack of protocol and facility's effort to monitor residents and obtain referral and treatment for residents (Resident 1) that were hard of hearing. 4. lack of facility's monitoring and tracking residents that were in need of oral care. 5. lack of monitoring to ensure DHPPD meet the minimum hours required for direct care staffing. 6. lack of Restorative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify three instances of abuse, when: 1) One unlicensed staff member withheld food for one resident (unidentified resident) due to the resident's behavior; 2) Staff neglected to change briefs soiled with urine and feces, resulting in skin breakdown (no specific resident was identified) and staff verbally abused a resident (Resident 19), who was one out of one sampled resident. These failures to identify abusive behavior from a staff member toward residents created an environment where residents' rights were violated, and the residents were fearful to report any abusive behaviors from the staff for fear of retaliation. Findings: During a telephone interview on 2/8/24 at 8:35 a.m., a Complainant indicated there were bad things going on between a staff person and the residents, but specifically something happened around 1/25/24, and it was bad. The Complainant indicated the resident involved wanted anonymity and no names were identified. The Complainant indicated, since the Administrator started working at the building in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record the facility failed to identify and report three instances of abuse when the Administrator had documented disciplinary actions (1/21/24, 1/22/24 and 2/6/24) for one unlicensed staff (Unlicensed Staff C) and did not notify the Department. These failures to report abusive behavior from unlicensed staff towards residents created an environment where residents' rights were violated, and the residents were fearful to report any negative behaviors from staff due to retaliation. Findings: During a telephone interview on 2/8/24 at 8:35 a.m., with a Complainant, the Complainant indicated there were bad things going on between a staff person and the residents, but specifically something happened around 1/25/24, and it was bad. The Complainant indicated the resident involved wanted anonymity and no names were identified. The Complainant indicated, since Administrator started working at the building in 2022, the residents and staff would not discuss concerns or issues. The Complainant indicated the residents were fearful the building would close if any complaints…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of Notice of Discharge or Transfer to the representative of the Office of the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a public advocate (official) is an official who is charged with representing the interests of the public by investigating and addressing complaints of maladministration or a violation of rights) for four Resident's: Residents 85, was discharged to home, and Residents 86, 87 and 88 were transferred to acute facilities. These failures had the potential for Residents (Resident 85, 86, 87 and 88) were not being provided an advocate who could inform them of their rights and options before being discharge to home or transferred to an acute care facility out of 36 sampled residents. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE] at 2:21 p.m., with Social Services Assistant (SSA), SSA reviewed, a resident who had been discharged and when reviewing the electronic medical record, the progress note did not indicate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. basic care plans (BCP, a plan that promotes continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff to increase resident safety) were completed timely for one out of four sampled residents (Resident 6). 2. the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a group of dedicated healthcare professionals who work together to provide you with the care you need) reviewed the physician's order and implement the BCP to meet the residents immediate care needs, initial goals, physician's orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services and Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) recommendations if applicable for four out of four sampled residents (Residents 6, 12, 27 and 31). 3. residents or their representative were provided a summary of the BCP for four out of four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure oral care was provided regularly and per plan of care for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 31). This failure led to Resident 31 having a thick whitish, yellowish tinged material on her tongue and could put Resident 31 at risk for dental caries, bad breath and infections. Findings: A review of Resident 31's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Hyperlipidemia (HLP, high cholesterol is an excess of lipids or fats in your blood), Essential Hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure) and Failure to Thrive (FTT, a decline in older adults that manifests as a downward spiral of health and ability). Her Minimum Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes) dated 3/25/24, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a mandatory tool used to screen and identify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a significant weight change was reported to the physician and the Registered Dietician (RD) for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 6), when: 1.Resident 6 lost 12.8 pounds (#, a measure of weight) or 7.6 percent (%, a relative value indicating hundredth parts of any quantity) between 4/2023 and 5/2023. 2.Resident 6 gained 17.8# or 11.5 % between 5/2023 and 8/2023. These significant weight changes, if not reported to the physician and RD, could put Resident 6 at risk for increased mortality and subsequent occurrence of adverse health outcomes. A review of Resident 6's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Parkinsonism (a term used to describe the collection of signs and movement symptoms associated with several conditions), Feeding Difficulties (behavioral conditions characterized by severe and persistent disturbance in eating behaviors) and Muscle Weakness. His…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure they were adequately staffed when: A.six out of six sampled residents (Residents 12, 13, 20, 24, 27 and 31) complained the facility was short staffed. B. for the month of 4/2024, the total direct care service hours patient per day (DHPPD, staffing requirement ) was not met for 24 out of 30 days on these dates: 4/1/24, 4/4/24, 4/6/24, 4/7/24, 4/9/24, 4/10/24, 4/11/24, 4/12/24, 4/13/24, 4/14/24, 4/16/24, 4/17/24, 4/118/24, 4/19/24, 4/20/24, 4/21/24, 4/23/24, 4/24/24, 4/25/24, 4/26/24, 4/27/24, 4/28/24, 4/29/24, 4/30/24 and the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) PPD was not met for 28 out of 30 days on these dates: 4/1/24, 4/2/24, 4/3/24, 4/4/24, 4/4/24, 4/5/24, 4/6/24, 4/7/24, 4/8/24, 4/10/24, 4/11/24, 4/12/24, 4/14/24, 4/15/24, 4/16/24, 4/17/24, 4/18/24, 4/19/24, 4/20/24, 4/21/24, 4/22/24, 4/23/24, 4/24/24, 4/25/24, 4/26/24, 4/27/24, 4/28/24, 4/29/24, 4/30/24. C. for the month of 5/2024, the total DHPPD was not met on 6 out of 20 days on these…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs when: 1.staff did not know what a Baseline Care Plan (BCP, should be developed within 24 hours of admission and contain the minimum health care information necessary to care for the residents) was, and its completion time frame. 2. staff did not know what a Trauma Informed Care (TIC, an approach care that acknowledges the complete picture of a resident's life situation, past and present, to provide effective health care services with a healing orientation and prevent retraumatization) was. These failures could put residents at risk for unsafe, inadequate, and ineffective care. During an interview on 5/22/24 at 8:25 a.m., the Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated she was not aware of what BCP was and stated she did not know the timeframe for completing a BCP. However, the DSD stated if a care plan (CP, a form that summarizes a person's health conditions and current treatments for their care) was not completed timely it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-24 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. staffing information was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors, when the nursing staffing information was kept in a binder behind the counter at the nursing station 2. staffing information was accurate and current. 3. staffing information was complete and was not missing information when the nursing home patient per day (NHPPD, the actual nursing hours performed by direct caregivers per patient day) was left blank. These failures resulted in the nurse staffing information being inaccessible to residents and visitors at any given time and the facility not meeting the NHPPD staffing requirement (cross reference F725). Findings: During an observation on 5/20/24 at 4:00 p.m., there was no visible staffing information posted in the building or at the nursing station. During a concurrent observation, interview, and staffing information, dated 5/21/24, record review on 5/21/24 at 11:15 a.m., Licensed Staff D verified there was no visible staffing information posted in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure for one out of eight sampled residents (Resident 12): 1. all his medications were secured in a locked storage area with limited access to authorized personnel consistent with state or federal requirements and professional standards of practice. This failure resulted in unsecured and unsafe storage of all the medications of Resident 12 which was a huge safety risk not only to Resident 12 but also to the other residents at the facility. 2. the facility followed their procedures for ensuring his safety when he was self-administering his medications. This failure put Resident 12 at risk for accessing and ingesting medications that could cause clinically significant adverse consequences, worsening of his symptoms which could also result to serious harm or death. Findings: A review of Resident 12's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Hyperlipidemia (HLP, high…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with food that was palatable (Palatability may influence food choice as it is proportional to the pleasure someone experiences when eating a particular food. It depends on the sensory properties of the food such as taste, smell, texture, sound, and sight). This failure had the potential to result in nutritional problems if the residents declined to eat the food served by the facility. Findings: During an interview on 5/20/24, at 2:54 p.m., with Resident 12, he stated the food was bad and canned vegetable food that was being served were mushy. He stated the food served had no taste, sometimes served cold. He stated sometimes he did not eat the food provided by the facility. During an interview on 5/20/24, at 3:44 p.m., with Resident 27, he stated the food was not great but did not elaborate what his concerns were with the food served by the facility. During an interview on 5/20/24, time not specified, with Resident 7, she stated she was not getting fresh food. She stated food served was mostly frozen, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that: 1. clean linens were transported from the laundry room to the clean storage areas of the facility by methods that promoted cleanliness and protection from dust and soil, when the linen cart used for the transport was not covered. 2. staff perform hand hygiene (HH, a term used to cover both hand washing using soap and water, and cleaning hands with waterless or alcohol-based hand sanitizers (an alcohol-containing preparation (liquid, gel or foam) designed for application to the hands to inactivate microorganisms and/or temporarily suppress their growth) was being done by staff prior to assisting residents with their meal and staff were offering to the residents HH before and after meals for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 6, 24, and 27) 3. urinals (a vessel for receiving urine) with collection of urine were not hung on resident's walker for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 12), and was not left at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate the Level II Preadmission Screening (PASARR) after a positive result for Level I PASARR) for one (1) of eight (8) residents, Resident 17. This failure resulted in a delay of MD's evaluation for mental illness and a delay of care and services needed for Resident 17. Findings: Level II PASARR is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in a nursing home for long term care. A record review of Resident 17 titled admission record indicated she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with mental illness (MI). A record review of Resident 17's evaluation titled Level I PASARR dated 08/10/21 was positive indicated a Level II PASARR mental health evaluation from Department of Health Services was required. A review of the regulatory health and safety code § 483.20(e)(1) Incorporating the recommendations from the PASARR level II determination and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 12): 1.was using his continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, a breathing therapy device that delivers air to a mask worn over the nose) every night at bedtime and staff was assisting him on putting on his CPAP mask. 2.staff obtained a physician order for the setting of his CPAP machine. 3.staff put on a no smoking signage in his room since he was using a CPAP. These failures could lead to daytime Fatigue (lack of energy), high Blood Pressure, low oxygen levels, increased Blood Sugar, elevated heart rate, headaches, and mood changes. Findings: A review of Resident 12's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Hyperlipidemia (HLP, high cholesterol is an excess of lipids or fats in your blood), Essential Hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure) and Muscle Weakness. His Minimum Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 1) 1.in gaining access to hearing services by obtaining an audiologist (a specialist in the treatment of hearing disorders) referral. 2. making an appointment to see an audiologist. 3 .Resident 1's hearing aids (HA, a small electronic devices that amplify sound, help improve hearing and speech comprehension in people with hearing loss) were checked for functionality. These failures led to Resident 1's having difficulty in hearing spoken words. These failures put Resident 1 at risk for miscommunication, frustration and difficulty understanding spoken words. Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Hyperlipidemia (HLP, high cholesterol is an excess of lipids or fats in your blood), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM, disease caused by a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one out of four sampled residents, Resident 23, received Range of Motion (ROM- means the extent or limit to which a part of the body can be moved around a joint or a fixed point; the totality of movement a joint is capable of doing. Range of motion of a joint is gauged during passive ROM (assisted) PROM or active ROM (independent) AROM) exercises as ordered by her physician and according to her comprehensive care plan. This failure had the potential to result in the development of new contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) or worsening of contractures to her left and right ankles that could affect her health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 23's admission Record, dated 5/23/24, indicated that her principal diagnosis was Multiple Sclerosis (a chronic degenerative, often episodic disease of the central nervous system marked by patchy destruction of the myelin that surrounds and insulates nerve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to employ a Certified Dietary Manager with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, when there was no designated full time Director of Food and Nutrition Services onsite, as required, when the facility's Registered Dietitian was not employed on a full-time basis. This failure had the potential to result in food borne illnesses when no oversight was provided to the dietary staff during food preparation and could affect the health and safety of all residents of the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/14/23, at 2:15 p.m., with Dietary Staff A, the dietary manager was not in the facility. Dietary Staff A stated Dietary Staff B was the dietary manager, and if there were issues in the kitchen, he would contact her by phone. During an interview on 9/14/23, at 2:40 p.m., with CNA C (Certified Nursing Assistant C), she stated she had not seen this dietary manager (Dietary Staff B) in the building. CNA C stated, This is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-20 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Registered Dietician (RD) provided comprehensive oversight of the dietary services. Failure to ensure comprehensive oversight by the RD might have resulted in: 1. menus were not followed. Refer to F 803; 2. facility did not follow physician prescribed therapeutic diets. Refer to F 808; and 3. the facility did not store and prepare food in accordance with professional standard. Refer to F 812. This failure also had the potential for systematic failures of nutrition service and impaired quality of life for all 35 residents in the facility and had the potential to cause widespread food-borne illness in a vulnerable population with complex medical conditions. Findings: During multiple observations, interviews, and record reviews, from 5/16/22 - 5/20/22, at various times through out the day, nutritional services were provided in a manor that did not meet the 2017 Food Code standards. During an interview with the RD, on 5/20/22, at 10:16 a.m., the RD stated she had been contracted to provide RD services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. eggs were purchased for resident consumption that were not pasteurized, 2. food was stored past the facility's use by date, 3. food was stored in open packaging, 4. fruits and vegetables stored for use had mold spots, had turned brown, and had gotten soft and squishy, 5. food containers were removed from their external packaging and stored without documentation to show the products expiration date, 6. prepared food was stored and ready for use past the facility's policy, 7. food preparation areas were not cleaned or sanitized between uses, 8. staff did not perform hand hygiene after removing their gloves, 9. the solution used to sanitize kitchen surfaces was not at an acceptable concentration per the manufacturer's guidelines 79 times out of 79 opportunities, 10. the internal components of the ice machine were not drained, cleaned, and sanitized as needed or according to the manufacturer's specifications, 11. the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and services to ensure resident's abilities to perform Activities of Daily Living did not decline when Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) services (RNAs perform range of motion exercises and strengthening exercises) were not provided as ordered for four Residents (Resident 4, Resident 84, Resident 28 and Resident 23). This failure had the potential to result in decline of resident's Activities of Daily Living (ADL)(The ability to be able to eat, wash, shower, brush teeth, walk, transfer to a toilet or wheelchair independently or with minimal assistance.), and contractures (A condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). Findings: 1. During an observation and interview on 5/17/22, at 8:34 a.m., Resident 4 was observed seated in his wheelchair at his bedside. He stated he had not had and Physical Therapy (PT) or RNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enough staff to meet the needs of residents, when Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) services were discontinued and used RNA staff as a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). This failure had the potential to result in resident falls, skin breakdown, and residents decline of resident's Activities of Daily Living (ADL)(The ability to be able to eat, wash, shower, brush teeth, walk, transfer to a toilet or wheelchair independently or with minimal assistance.), and contractures (A condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). Findings: (Reference F676) 1. During an observation on 5/16/22, at 11:05 a.m., the white board in Nurse Station 1 indicated Licensed Nurse P, Unlicensed Staff Q, Unlicensed Staff R, and Unlicensed Staff S on duty. During an interview on 5/16/22, at 12:36 p.m., Resident 4 stated staffing was really short. He stated the short staffing had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed when; 1. 3 out of 3 recipes were not followed for the lunch meal served on 5/19/22, 2. All Residents were given 2 slices from a 5 inch personal pizza rather than 2 slices from a twelve inch pizza for the dinner meal served on 5/16/22, 3. The wheat roll was omitted from the lunch meal served on 5/16/22, a substitution was not offered, 4. 1 resident on a pureed diet (Resident 8) received the wrong dessert item for 1 lunch meal served on 5/19/22. These failures resulted in altered nutritional content of the menu and put vulnerable residents at risk for imbalanced nutrition, weight loss and worsening of medical conditions. Findings: 1a. During a review of the facility document titled, Good For Your Health Menus, dated 5/16/22-5/23/22, the menu indicated what was expected for lunch on 5/19/22. The menu indicated Szechuan pork, fried rice, stir fry vegetables, confetti coleslaw, and tapioca pudding would be served.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-20 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician prescribed therapeutic diets when: 1. Mechanical Soft (MS) texture was not followed during the 5/19/22 lunch meal, which increased the risk for choking for residents with chewing or swallowing difficulty; 2. High protein diets were not followed, which had the potential for worsening nutritional status of residents that needed protein dense meals. Failure to follow physician ordered diets had the potential to compromise the medical status for all 23 residents with a therapeutic diet. Findings: 1. During an observation, on 5/19/22, at 12:10 p.m., in the kitchen, Dietary G removed 8-10 scoopfuls of pork and put them into a food processor. Dietary G pulsed the food processor 4 short pulses and 2 long pulses. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 5/19/22, at 12:25 p.m., with the DM and Dietary G, Dietary G stated the pork in the food processor was used for residents on a mechanical soft diet. Dietary G stated the small, chopped up pork pieces were appropriate for residents on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-05-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an active and engaged Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee. This failure had the potential to not proactively identify resident care issues and develop a sustainable plan to address the concerns. Findings: During an interview and record review, with the Administrator, on 5/20/22 at 12:31 p.m., she stated she had started as the Administrator in April 2022, and had met once with the Quality Assurance Performance Assurance Committee. She could not provide a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Plan, approved by the QAPI Committee or Governing board for 2022. She stated she had prioritized to work on Dietary Remodeling Issues and Staffing. The Administrator stated she had not fully developed the QAPI process at this time. A review of the QAPI minutes indicated the committee met in April, but had not fully developed any Performance Improvement Projects to address Falls Prevention, Staffing shortages, Suspension of the Restorative Nursing Assistant program, Pharmacy Recommendations, or Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-20 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge plan for one of one sampled residents (Resident 26) when 1) the facility did not discuss Resident 26's facility-initiated discharge plan with the resident's daughter or obtained the daughter's agreement to care for Resident 26, and 2) the facility-initiated discharge plan to discharge Resident 26 to a location that was not determined by the choice or the best interests of Resident 26. This failure resulted in Resident 26 feeling very upset and had to go through an appeal process. Findings: The intake information sheet dated 4/28/22 indicated that the Department (the California Department of Public Health) received an anonymous complaint on 4/28/22 regarding a involuntarily discharge of a resident. The complaint information included that the resident had gone through an appeal process with the Office of Administrative Hearing and Appeals. The resident was granted to be remained in the facility due to the facility did not provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$87,802 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $78,832 — penalty dated 2026-03-06
  • $8,970 — penalty dated 2025-02-12
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-04 for 32 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-08 for 25 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SHERWOOD OAKS POST ACUTE CARE, LLC.Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 02/21/2022
DICKMAN WESTON GROUPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
HANSEN HUNTER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/21/2022
BALDWIN, RONALDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/18/2022
NG, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/21/2022
XIE, QINGIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/18/2022
SERENETHOS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/21/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 16%Other / private 2%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$390per resident / day
operating cost
$11,861per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$356per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056483. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next