California Home For The Aged
6720 E. Kings Canyon, Fresno, CA 93727 · Non profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (559) 251-8414 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 5 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.6% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.4% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.8% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.12 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.33 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 315 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 198 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.2%CMS range 43.0–55.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 7.9–13.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 55.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 5.8–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.28 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 98.9 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2025-08-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was identified as being at risk for falls with a history of seven falls in the facility and the care planned intervention of a 1:1 (continuous observation and support provided by one qualified staff member to one resident) was not implemented and Resident fell on 7/18/25. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing a witnessed fall, from the bed onto the floor on 7/18/25. After the fall Resident 1 experienced pain, discoloration and tenderness to the left shoulder and was sent to the general acute care hospital (GACH) for evaluation. Resident 1 was diagnosed with a non-displaced (a break where the broken pieces of bone remain in their proper alignment and position) clavicle (collarbone) fracture (a break or discontinuity in a bone), and her left shoulder was bruised. As a result of Resident 1's injury she now needs assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication was addressed on the comprehensive care plan for 1 (Resident #5) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised 03/2022, indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The policy indicated, 1. The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #5 on 11/11/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses administered medications in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 received medications that were not prescribed for her on 8/20/24. This failure resulted in Resident 1 receiving medication not prescribed for her which had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for adverse drug effects (an injury resulting from medical intervention related to a drug that includes medication errors). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) (document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis), dated 09/4/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnosis included but are not limited to .TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) .HYPO-OSMOLALITY AND HYPONATREMIA (having low levels of electrolytes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a comfortable homelike environment for three of 15 sampled residents (Residents 1, 29 and 81) when the air vents (an opening which allows air to pass out of or into a room) in Resident 1, 29, and 81's rooms were covered with black and brown stains and had dust in between the slits of the vent. This failure resulted in Residents 1, 29, and 81 not being provided a comfortable, homelike environment and had the potential to cause the residents to experience illness from breathing in dust from the air vents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/25/24 at 10:26 am with Resident 1 and 29 in their room, the air vent above their door was observed to have black and brown stain marks over the exterior. Resident 1 stated her air vent looked dirty to her and she could not recall when the air vent last looked clean. Resident 1 stated she would have never had the air vent in her own home in the same condition as the one in her current room. Resident 1 stated she would like to see the air vent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans (CP - a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's needs) for four of 22 sampled residents (Residents 49, 80, 37 and 4) when: 1. Residents 49 and 80 did not have an individualized care plan developed and implemented for the use of side rails. This failure had the potential for Residents 49 and 80 to be injured while using the side rails. 2. Resident 37 had an order of ipratropium bromide (medication used for breathing) via hand-held nebulizer (small machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be easily inhaled through a connected mouthpiece or facemask) once a day for respiratory illness. This failure placed Resident 37 at a potential risk for not being educated on how to use a hand-held nebulizer for prescribed treatments. 3. Resident 37 was using low air loss mattress to prevent skin breakdown (when skin is deprived of blood flow the skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for four of 12 sampled residents (Residents 25, 52, 55 and 66) when: 1. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 signed the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR- legal record of drug administration to a patient at a facility by a health care professional) prior to administering Resident 25's medications. This failure resulted in inaccurate charting and placed Resident 25 at a risk to not receive the medications ordered. 2. RN 1 did not follow the medication administration direction when she applied a lidocaine patch (medication patch applied on top of the skin for relief of pain) to Resident 25's left upper arm. This failure had the potential to put Resident 25 at risk for skin irritation. 3. LVN 4 did not follow medication administration direction when she administered Resident 55's medication without food. This failure had the potential to put Resident 55 at risk for stomach upset which could result in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate did not exceed five percent or greater when: 1. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 did not administer metoprolol (medication used to treat high blood pressure and pulse). This failure resulted in Resident 25 not receiving her blood pressure medication as prescribed by the physician and had the potential for Resident 25 to have elevated or low blood pressure and pulse and serious medical condition. 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 did not follow direction on the medication label to administer with breakfast when she administered Resident 55's potassium chloride (medication used to treat hypokalemia [low potassium level]). This failure had the potential for Resident 55 to not receive the therapeutic effect of the medication which could lead to high or low potassium level and result in serious medical condition. These medication errors resulted in a calculated medication error of 7.69 percent. Findings: 1. During a concurrent medication pass observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles when two of two improper medication storage and labeling occured for: 1. Resident 5's hydromorphone (medication used to treat pain), hydrocodone-acetaminophen ( a narcotic medication used to treat pain) and lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety) were found repacked in smaller plastic bags with no labels and placed back in the plastic medication container from the pharmacy. These failures had the potential for Resident 5 to not receive the right medication which could lead to more serious medical conditions and had the potential for drug diversion (abuse of prescription drugs or their use for purposes ot intended by the prescriber). 2. Medication cart three had two boxes of omeperazole (medication used to treat heartburn) without received dates (a date when the medication had been opened ) and did not have expiration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with a well-balanced diet to meet their nutritional needs for: 1.Three of five sampled residents (Resident 44, Resident 74 and Resident 83) when the Residents had a physician order for a supplement that was discontinued, and the Residents continued to receive the supplement. 2.Two of the five sampled residents (Resident 75 and Resident 30) when the Residents did not have a physician order for a chopped diet. This failure resulted in Resident 44, Resident 74 and Resident 83 receiving a discontinued supplement and had the potential to result in Resident 75's and Resident 30's nutritional needs not being met. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/25/24 at12:00 p.m., with [NAME] 3 and the Food Service Worker (FSW) 1, in the kitchen during the lunch meal service (a process when food is put into a tray) Resident 74 was missing a juice nutrition supplement (a nutritional supplement designed to support…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of the seven sample residents (Resident 13 and Resident 21) small portion diet were not followed according to their alternate menu for lunch on March 25, 2024. The failure had the potential result to not meet the resident's caloric intake and contribute to weight loss, further compromising the medical status. Finding: During an observation on 3/25/24 at 12:00 p.m., in the kitchen during the lunch meal service, [NAME] 1 was observed using a #16 scoop (1/4 cup) of Spanish rice on Resident 13's and Resident 21's lunch tray. Review of the lunch tray ticket for Resident 13 and Resident 21 showed, they were on a small portion diet. During a concurrent interview and record review of the lunch menu on 3/25/24 at 12:33 p.m. after the lunch meal service was completed, with [NAME] 1 and Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), the Daily Spreadsheet dated March 25, 2024, was reviewed. The Daily Spread sheet indicated Spanish rice small portion scoop size was #12 scoop (1/3 cup). [NAME] 1 stated scoop size #16 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food was prepared in accordance with professional standard for food service safety when one of two sampled kitchen staff (Cook 2) did not have a beard restraint while preparing food. This failure had the potential for [NAME] 2's hair to fall into the food and caused contamination. Findings: During a concurrent observation on 3/26/24 at 9:10 a.m. with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), in the kitchen during food preparation, [NAME] 2 was observed slicing and measuring roast beef. [NAME] 2 was observed with a surgical mask that covered his mouth and nose only. It was observed that he had facial hair on the sides of his face that was without a beard restraint to cover his facial hair and beard. During an observation on 3/26/24 at 9:36 a.m. in the kitchen during food preparation, [NAME] 2 was observed putting roast beef into a food processor and chopped it. [NAME] 2 was observed putting roast beef with the juice from the roast beef into the food processor and blending it. [NAME] 2 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 24 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards when: 1. One of four residents (Resident 52) medical record did not reflect when change of the humidifier bottle (medical devices filled with water that increase the humidity in the oxygen being delivered) and amount of oxygen administered was not accurately documented. This failure placed Resident 52 at risk of the humidifier bottle not being changed timely, the water becoming stagnant (stale or foul), oxygen would not be humidified leading to dry, cracked and bleeding mucosal membranes (the moist outer layer that lines various cavities in the body) and receiving the incorrect amount of oxygen. 2. Four of eight sampled residents (Residents 29, 77, 81and 83) Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a medical order signed by both the patient and medical provider that specifies the types of medical treatment a patient wishes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement safe infection control measures for two of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 4) when: Resident 2's urinary catheter bag (a tube that is inserted into the bladder, allowing the urine to drain freely into an attached bag), and Resident 4's urinary tubing was observed lying on the floor. This failure had the potential to spread harmful bacteria (microorganisms that can be found on surfaces and in the body), infections to both Resident 2 and Resident 4. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 3/27/24, the AR indicated Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy (a condition in which the flow of urine is blocked. This causes the urine to back up and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure titled In-service Training to ensure Licensed Nurses (LNs), Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and ancillary (additional) support staff received and demonstrated competency to prevent and recognize resident abuse and the necessary skills and techniques necessary to care for residents with Dementia [a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorders, personality changes, and impaired reasoning] when: 1. 36 of 67 CNAs had not attended and completed the 2023 annual mandatory in-service training for Dementia Module 1 titled Caring for Persons with Dementia. 2. 47 of 67 CNAs had not attended and completed the 2023 annual mandatory in-service training for Dementia Module 4 titled More than Words. 3. 22 of 120 facility staff had not attended and completed the 2023 annual mandatory in-service training for Fall Prevention. 4. 50 of 120 facility staff had not attended and completed the 2023 annual mandatory in-service training for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for two of two sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 26) when Resident 2 and Resident 26's urinary catheter (tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra, to drain freely into a connected bag) bags were not placed in a dignity bag (a bag the catheter drainage bag into to shield the resident's urine from view) and were visible from the hall outside the resident's room. This failure violated Resident 2 and Resident 26's need for urinary catheterization to remain private to ensure their dignity and respect. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), dated 03/27/24, the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included Dementia (impaired thinking, remembering or reasoning), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (high levels of sugar in the blood), Anemia (lower than normal red blood cells), Neuromuscular Dysfunction (nerve and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status for one of five sampled residents (Resident 65) when Resident 65's functional limitation in range of motion was inaccurately coded on the MDS assessment. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 65's care needs not met. Findings: During a review of Resident 65's admission Record (document with resident demographic and medical diagnosis information), dated 3/28/24, indicated Resident 65 was admitted in the facility on 12/20/23, with diagnosis which included hemiplegia (severe or complete loss of strength and hemiparesis (mild loss of strength), muscle weakness and atherosclerotic heart disease (thickening or hardening of the arteries caused by a buildup of plaque [small, abnormal patch of tissue] in the inner lining of an artery). During a concurrent observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Level l Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR-The State is required to ensure that every person entering a Medicaid certified Nursing Facility [NF] receives a Level I screening and if necessary a Level II evaluation to ensure that their NF residence is appropriate and to identify what specialized services they may need) was completed for one of five sampled residents (Resident 27) when Resident 27 was diagnosed with major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), dementia (loss of of cognitive functioning-thinking, remembering and reasoning) and psychotic disorder (severe mental disorders that cause abnormal thinking and perceptions) and was started on psychotropic medications (medications used to treat mental health disorders) on 12/2/19. This failure had the potential for Resident 27 to not receive the necessary and appropriate psychiatric (relating to mental illness) level of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing services to ensure residents receive services to maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being when one of four nursing staff (Infection Preventionist-IP) did not receive a competency skills check after being hired. This failure had the potential to place residents' at risk of being exposed to the spread of infections. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/26/24, at 10:44 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the facility document titled, Licensed Nurse Competency, undated was reviewed. The DON stated, the IP completed her employment application on 11/30/23 and was hired and started her orientation on 12/18/23. The DON stated, the IP was responsible for the facility's infection prevention and control program and reports to the DON. The DON stated, she does not recall initiating and validating the IP's nurse competency. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services which ensured the administration of medications to meet residents needs for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 25) when Resident 25's metoprolol (medication used to treat high blood pressure) was not available for administration for 1 day (3/27/24). This failure had the potential for Resident 25's blood pressure to be uncontrolled and lead to serious medical condition such as a stroke (a loss of blood flow to part of the brain, which damages brain tissue). Findings: During a concurrent medication pass observation and interview on 3/27/24 at 7:15 a.m., at Station 2, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was preparing Resident 25's medications after checking blood pressure which was 150/85 (a normal blood pressure for adults is a systolic measurement of less than 120 milimeters of mercury (mmHg unit of measurement) and a diastolic reading under 80 mmHg) and pulse of 85. RN 1 did not administer Resident 25's metoprolol medication. RN 1 stated the medication was not available to give to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public when one of three medication rooms (Station 5) was observed with only one of four fluorescent lights was working. This failure had the potential for distribution of the wrong medications for residents and for staff to trip and fall. Findings: During a concurrent observation, interview and record review on 3/26/24, at 3:50 p.m. in Station 5 medication room with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5, the medication room was observed to be dark when we entered the room, there were four fluorescent lights in the ceiling and only one of the four fluorescent lights was working. LVN 5 stated she did not usually worked in Station 5 and was not aware if the lights had already been reported to maintenance department. LVN 5 stated all four fluorescent lights should all be working to be better to see medication labels better. LVN 5 stated, . it could cause tripping and fall . During an interview on 3/26/24, at 5:02 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 2,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an infection prevention and control program that included an antibiotic stewardship program that ensured residents who required antibiotics were prescribed the appropriate antibiotic, when the Infection Preventionist (IP) was unaware one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 67) who tested positive for extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL- enzymes produced by a variety of gram negative bacteria with an increased resistance [not easily killed by] to commonly used antibiotics) and the physician was not notified of the lab results, and the resident was treated with an antibiotic her infection was resistant to. This failure had the potential for Resident 67's infection to not be treated with the appropriate medication and placed Resident 67 at risk to become septic (an infection spread throughout the body) and experience worsening of the infection. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 4/19/22, at 2:39 p.m., with the IP, the facility's antibiotic stewardship program was reviewed. The IP stated, part…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of quality when: 1. The facility's pain assessment tool for cognitively impaired (when a person has trouble remembering, learning new things, concentrating, or making decisions that affect their everyday life) residents, Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (impairment of at least two brain functions, such as memory loss and judgment) (PAINAD), was not used for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 67). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 67's pain going unnoticed and untreated, which could delay healing time, disturb sleep and activity patterns, reduce function, and reduce quality of life. 2. One of four sampled licensed nurses (Registered Nurse [RN] 1) administered two medications crushed together in Resident 63's gastrostomy tube (G-tube- a tube surgically inserted through the abdominal wall that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) at the same time, against the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory (network of organs and tissues that help you breathe) care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for four of five sampled residents (Residents 25, 39, 52, and 55) when: 1. Resident 25 had a humidifier (a container with sterile water used to prevent dry airway when breathing oxygen) with an outdated label (3/9/22); 2. Resident 39 had a humidifier with an outdated label (4/7/22); 3. Resident 52 had a humidifier with an outdated label (4/10/22); 4. Resident 55's oxygen humidifier and tubing were not dated; and 5. A non-licensed staff member (Central Supply [CS]) routinely changed residents' oxygen humidifiers and tubing, against the facility's policy and procedure titled, Oxygen Concentrator. These failures resulted in a non-licensed staff to perform duties they were not supposed to perform and had the potential for contamination of oxygen equipment for Residents 25, 39, 52, 55 that could lead to illness, or even death. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 25's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-22 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 20 of 22 licensed nursing staff (LN) possessed the competencies required to provide for residents' needs, when annual competency evaluations were not documented as completed in 2021. This failure had the potential for staff to not possess the appropriate skills and competencies to assure residents' safety and provide appropriate care. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/21/22, at 2:25 p.m., with Accounts Payable (AP), employee files and staffing schedules were reviewed for compliance with staffing regulations. The AP validated orientation check off lists were kept in the employee files, but there were no recent annual competencies to be found in three of three sampled nursing staff files (Licensed Vocational Nurse [LVN] 7, LVN 8, and Registered Nurse [RN] 3. LVN 7's employee file indicated, LVN 7 started working at the facility on 2/10/2022. The orientation check off was completed and competencies were checked on abuse and reporting abuse. No other competency was in the file. LVN 8's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in accordance with professional standards, when: 1. The mechanical soft (chopped to make the food soft and easy to eat) salad located on the lunch assembly line was 56 degrees Fahrenheit (F- scale used to measure temperature) (acceptable temperature is below 41 degrees F) when measured with a food thermometer. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for complications from foodborne illness (sickness caused by bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). 2. Individually wrapped cookies and crackers were stored in three easily accessible snack bins. The individually wrapped cookies and crackers and the bins were not labeled with a use-by date. This failure had the potential for residents to consume foods that may have been compromised (quality and taste) and for residents to have a decrease in their nutritional intake. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/18/22, at 11:27 a.m., with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the tray line…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections when: 1. One of five sampled residents' (Resident 68) nasal cannula (device used to deliver oxygen that is placed in a resident's nose) was observed on the floor in Resident 68's room. This failure had the potential to result in transmission of organisms (germs) from the floor, onto the nasal cannula and to Resident 68. 2. Two of four Licensed Nurses (Licensed Vocation Nurse [LVN] 1 and LVN 3) failed to perform hand hygiene (hand washing using soap and water, and cleaning hands with waterless or alcohol-based hand sanitizer) prior to the administration of medications for three of 11 residents (Residents 69, 71 and 428). This failure had the potential to expose Residents 69, 71, and 428 to communicable diseases. Findings: 1. During an observation on 4/18/22, at 10:28 a.m., in Resident 68's room, a nasal cannula was attached to an oxygen concentrator (medical device…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-22 · tag F0888 — patternEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement and ensure their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Mandatory COVID-19 (communicable, respiratory disease that can cause severe illness in some people) Employee Vaccination Policy was followed, when the facility did not follow their process for granting non-medical exemptions, four of 19 staff members were inaccurately documented as having a non-medical exemption, and one nursing student was marked as having a non-medical exemption, without documentation of the exemption. This failure resulted in 93.8% (percent- unit of measurement) of staff being vaccinated for COVID-19, which placed residents at risk of being exposed and contracting COVID-19 from staff. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on [DATE], at 9:44 a.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the facility's COVID-19 staff Vaccination Status for Providers, updated [DATE], and proof of employee granted exemptions, were reviewed. The IP stated the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 73), when Resident 73 was admitted with hearing aids and the facility did not establish a care plan with interventions to address Resident 73's hearing needs. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 73 not having her hearing needs met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/18/22, at 3:19 p.m., with Resident 73, in Resident 73's room, Resident 73 was awake in her bed. Resident 73 had a hearing aid to her left ear and without a hearing aid to the right ear. Resident 73 stated her right hearing aid was missing. Resident 73 stated she kept her hearing aids in a pink box in her room. During a review of Resident 73's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (an evaluation used to identify resident care needs), dated 4/6/22, the MDS assessment indicated, Resident 73 was cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan with measurable objectives and timeframes for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 52), when Resident 52 required oxygen at night and a care plan was not developed to address Resident 52's respiratory needs. This failure had the potential for Resident 52's respiratory needs to be not met, which could lead to respiratory issues and/or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 52's admission Record (AR-a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 4/20/22, the AR indicated, admission Date 7/2/21 .Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-condition involving constriction of the airways and difficulty or discomfort in breathing) . During a review of Resident 52's Order Summary Report (OS), dated 7/9/21, the OS indicated, .Oxygen at 2L/min (liters per minute- unit of measurement) via nasal cannula (device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow to a person) at bedtime for shortness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of three sampled residents (Resident 55 and Resident 44) with an indwelling urinary catheter (a soft hollow tube which is passed into the bladder to drain urine, for persons who cannot empty their bladder) received appropriate care when: 1. Resident 55's indwelling urinary catheter had sediment (substances present in urine) trapped in the tubing and the physician was not notified; and 2. Resident 44's indwelling urinary catheter bag was partially folded and placed sideways in the catheter bag (bag used to cover the urinary catheter bag for privacy), preventing the free flow of urine. These failures placed Residents 55 and 44 at risk for urinary tract infections (infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder, or urethra). Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 55's admission Record (AR-a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 4/20/22, the AR indicated, admission Date 3/15/22 .Diagnosis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 25), that received dialysis (treatment that uses the blood stream to filter out wastes in the body for people whose kidneys are failing) treatments, received ongoing assessments, when the facility did not perform post (after) dialysis assessments (includes vital signs [clinical measurements including heart rate, temperature, respiration rate and blood pressure that indicate the state of a resident's essential body functions], access site [used for connecting to a machine that filters blood during treatment] assessment, and condition of resident) three out of five days (4/8/22, 4/11/22, 4/13/22). This failure resulted in incomplete assessments for Resident 25 and had the potential for the facility to not recognize dialysis related complications (low blood pressure, fluid overload, blood clots, muscle cramps, access site infection, and itchy skin) for Resident 25, that could lead to harm or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record (AR-a document that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an annual gradual dose reduction (GDR-tapering of a medication dosage to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or it can be discontinued) of antipsychotic medication (medication for the treatment of psychosis [involves a loss of contact with reality and can feature hallucinations and delusions]) in accordance with the facility policy and procedure titled Medication Monitoring Medication Management, dated 2007, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 70) when Resident 70 was prescribed and administered an antipsychotic medication and the previous effort to conduct a GDR was 2/20/21. There were no documented clinical contraindications (specific situation in which a drug, procedure, or surgery should not be used because it may be harmful to the person) related to the antipsychotic to not conduct the GDR. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 70 receiving unnecessary antipsychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's medication error rate did not exceed five percent, when two of 25 medication administration opportunities observed were not administered in accordance with facility policy and procedure (P&P) and standards of practice. This failure resulted in a medication error rate of 8% (percent- unit of measurement) and placed Resident 63 at risk for drug interaction and clumping of medications, which could result in plugging of the gastrostomy tube (G-tube- a tube surgically inserted through the abdominal wall that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) and prevent Resident 63 from getting the full therapeutic effect of all administered medications and nutrition. Findings: During a review of Resident 63's admission Record (AR-a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 4/21/22, the AR indicated, admission Date 7/18/18 .Diagnosis Information . Pneumonia (lung inflammation caused by bacterial or viral infection) .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow one of five sampled residents' (Resident 16) food preferences and dislikes, when Resident 16 received canned fruit instead of the preference for fresh fruit on her meal tray for lunch on 4/18/22. This failure had the potential to result in decreased food consumption for Resident 16. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/18/22, at 11:36 a.m., with Resident 16, in Resident 16's room, Resident 16 stated she received canned fruit and not fresh fruit. Resident 16's lunch tray was observed to have a container of canned chopped peaches. Residents 16's meal tray had a tray ticket that did not indicate likes or dislikes for fruit. During an interview on 4/19/22, at 9:29 a.m., with Resident 16, Resident 16 stated she received canned fruit on her meal tray. Resident 16 stated the canned fruit was not appealing. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/20/22, at 12:27 p.m., with Resident 16, in Resident 16's room, Resident 16 stated most of her meals came with fruit, but it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was offered the influenza (viral infection that attacks the respiratory system - your nose, throat and lungs) vaccine annually, when one of five sampled residents (Resident 64), was last offered the influenza vaccine in 2013, and no further education, offering, or declination (refusal) was obtained. This failure resulted in Resident 64 and/or their responsible parties (a person other than the resident, designated to make health care decisions on behalf of the resident), who had previously refused the vaccine, to not receive education and be offered the vaccine annually. Findings: During an interview on 4/19/22, at 9:03 a.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP stated, he had worked at facility since 2017 as a nurse and had been the facility's IP since February 2020. During a review of Resident 64's Influenza Immunization Informed Consent, dated 10/21/13, the Influenza Immunization Informed Consent indicated Resident 64 had not been offered nor declined the influenza vaccination since 2013.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| OFFICE OF STATEWIDE HEALTH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 11/20/2018 |
| BAGDASARIAN, MITCH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2022 |
| BRAA, MARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2022 |
| BZNOUNI, VAHAGN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2021 |
| DER SIMONIAN, VAROUJAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2021 |
| GRAYSON, LUCY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/11/2018 |
| HANNIGAN, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2021 |
| HOKOKIAN, EDWARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2023 |
| KRBOYAN, GARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2021 |
| MANGASARIAN, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/11/2018 |
| SAMPLE, GEORGIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2022 |
| SHAHBAZIAN, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 09/01/2023 |
| BACOPULOS, DENNIS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/01/2023 |
| ANDERSEN, TERRY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/29/2019 |
| BUWALDA, LORI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/14/2025 |
| GONZALES, MELANIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/23/2025 |
| HARRIS, CHARLENE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/18/2023 |
| HOPKINS, ANGELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| KAUR SARAN, BARINDER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/16/2025 |
| NOLEN, NICK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/08/2023 |
| PAYNE, TRISTAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/11/2022 |
| SIDHU, ASHA PRITPAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2007 |
| TELESMANIC, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2014 |
| TOOR, RAJWINDOR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 59 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055955. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.