No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Healthcare Centre Of Fresno

1665 M Street, Fresno, CA 93721 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 155 certified beds · (559) 268-5361 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (559) 268-5361 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0603) — cited Jul 20243 actual-harm citations$88,049 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Jul 2024
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $88,049 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-03)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2505 Merced St · (866) 707-6664 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walmart0.4 mi
5111 E Cesar Chavez Blvd · (559) 252-1872 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7-Eleven<0.1 mi
1408 E North Ave · (559) 981-2467 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2400 Fresno St · (559) 621-2900 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2305 Stanislaus St

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.5%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.4%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.5%9.8%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.9%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.4%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.3%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.6%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.852.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.471.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

33.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF33.1%CMS range 20.8–47.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 6.7–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge64.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting87.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge82.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.0–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.661.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.86
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.49
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.81
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.44
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 155 beds and averages 140.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-08)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when facility had knowledge of Resident 1's preference to sit outside, had a history of falls, and required assistance with personal care. Facility staff did not provide supervision while Resident 1 was outside and were unaware Resident 1 left the facility's premises on 10/1/24 unsupervised. These failures resulted in Resident wandering unsafely in the streets around the facility and suffering an avoidable auto versus pedestrian accident. Resident 1 sustained injuries which included injury to the right femur shaft fracture (break in the thigh bone between the hip and knee), closed inferior pubic rami fractures (break in one of the bones in part of the pelvis), traumatic pneumothorax (air leaks from the lung and fills the space between the lung and chest wall), closed fracture of multiple ribs, right phalanx fracture (a break…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when on 7/12/24 Resident 1 removed the window screw, opened the window, and jumped from the facility's second story. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 noted a change in Resident 1's demeanor and heard Resident 1 stating she is done and did not report to licensed staff. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a fracture (broken bone) of multiple ribs on the right side, laceration (bleeding or tearing) of the liver, fracture of the right femur (bone of the thigh articulating at the hip and the knee), and right pneumothorax (when air builds up in the space between the chest wall and lung and puts pressure on the lung causing it to collapse). Findings: During an interview on 7/12/24 at 8:45 a.m., with the administrator (ADM). The ADM stated Resident 1 had opened the window in her room located on the second floor and jumped off to the ground…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 fell out of bed during provision of care by Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) without assistance from another staff member in accordance with the Comprehensive Assessment and needs of the resident. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having an avoidable fall, sustaining injuries of a Fractured Occipital Condyle (break at the base where skull meets spine), laceration (cut) to her nose, bruising, swelling to her left eye and experienced pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 11/29/23, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, Dementia (loss of cognitive functioning, thinking remembering, and reasoning), Muscle Weakness, Difficulty in Walking and Other Specified Disorders of Bone Density and Structure (disease of the bone).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Individual Narcotic Record (INR) for Controlled Drugs (medications that are highly regulated by the government because of the significant risk of abuse and dependence they pose) were maintained accurately for five of six sampled residents (Resident 26, Resident 74, Resident 139, Resident 158 and Resident 159) when:1. The Licensed Nurse (LN)s transferred controlled medications for Resident 26 and Resident 158 from one medication cart to another, and the INR was not accurately completed by two required witnesses as indicated on the INR. This failure had the potential for Resident 26 and Resident 158 controlled medications to be diverted (illegal transfer or use of prescription medication) and Resident 26 and Resident 158's pain not to be met.2. Resident 74, Resident 139 and Resident 159 were administered controlled medications, and the INR was not signed by the LNs for each of the residents according to the facility's policy and procedure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards and ensure for five of eight sampled residents (Resident 18, Resident 86, Resident 92, Resident 119 and Resident 131) were free from significant medication errors, when Resident 86, Resident 119 and Resident 131's insulin (insulin lispro/ insulin aspart: fast-acting with a quick onset of 5-15 minutes injectable medication that lowers blood glucose (BG- sugar)) and Resident 18 and Resident 92's insulin (regular insulin: short-acting with a slower onset of 30-60 minutes injectable medication) were administered more than an hour before meal.This failure had the potential to result in hypoglycemic (condition where sugar levels in the blood drop too low) episodes for Resident 18, Resident 86, Resident 92, Resident 119 and Resident 131 which could lead to confusion, dizziness, blurred vision, seizures, and loss of consciousness.Findings:During an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 on 5/7/26 at 12:25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment for two of nine sampled residents (Resident 11 and Resident 69) when:1. Resident 11's bedside table had the plastic strip pulled away from the edge of the table with jagged rough edges on the bedside table.2. Resident 69's overhead bed light did not have a string attached that allowed Resident 69 to turn the light on and off.These failures had the potential to create a non-homelike environment for Resident 11 and Resident 69 and placed Resident 11 and Resident 69 at risk of injury and harm.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/5/2026 at 9:52 a.m. with Resident 11 in Resident 11's room, Resident 11 was observed dressed, standing by her wheelchair. Resident 11 stated she had been at the facility since February 2026 due to having a stroke (cerebral infarction - damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area). Resident's bedside table observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of 13 sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 125) when:1. License Nurses (LN)s did not develop a detailed and person-centered care plan for Resident 5's pain. 2. LNs did not develop a care plan for Resident 125 indicating family preferences to not having the bedside table within reach due to safety concerns.These failures created the risk of inadequate care, potentially compromising Resident 5 and Resident125's safety and negatively affecting the overall quality of care and services provided.Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/5/25 at 3:50 p.m. with Resident 5 in Resident 5's room, Resident 5 was sitting in his wheelchair looking out the window. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safe storage, supervision, and control of smoking materials for one of five sampled residents (Resident 37) when Resident 37 had a box of cigarettes with cigarettes inside placed on top of Resident 37's nightstand, accessible without staff knowledge or supervision.This failure had the potential to result in significant safety hazards, including unsupervised smoking, burn injuries, accidental fires, flash fires if smoking materials were used near oxygen equipment, and access to cigarettes by other residents.During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/5/2026 at 9:59 a.m. with Resident 37 in Resident 37's room, Resident 37 was observed lying in bed with a box of cigarettes with cigarettes inside, placed on top of Resident 37's nightstand. Resident 37 stated staff was unaware that the cigarette box was in his room.During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/7/2026 at 1:17 p.m. with Resident 37 in Resident 37's room,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received food that was palatable, attractive and appetizing for three of five sampled residents (resident 43, resident 126, and resident 130) when the facility ran out of polenta (coarsely ground cornmeal (yellow or white) that is boiled in water or broth until it becomes a thick, creamy porridge), during the lunch meal service and it was replaced with mashed potatoes. The temperature of the potatoes had not been taken, and the potatoes had a water-like consistency with water visibly pooling in the corner of the pan. The potatoes were placed on the tray line and served to residents. This failure had the potential for resident choking, weight loss, and malnutrition due to residents not eating unpalatable mashed potatoes.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/7/25 at 12:06 p.m. with the [NAME] (CK), in the facility's kitchen, a square metal pan of potatoes was placed on the tray line (an assembly line…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate residents' preferences and allergies and to follow the meal ticket (list of food dislikes, allergies, and texture of food), for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 69), when Resident 69 was allergic to orange juice and was served orange juice for her lunch time meal. This failure had the potential for undesired side effects including weight loss, rash, hives, and anaphylaxis shock (a severe, rapidly progressing, and potentially life-threatening systemic allergic reaction that affects multiple body systems simultaneously, such as the skin, breathing, and blood pressure).Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/7/26 at 11:00 a.m. with Resident 69 in Resident 69's room, a container of orange juice was sitting on Resident 69's bedside table. Resident 69 stated she was allergic to orange juice and had to put the orange juice to the side. Resident 69 stated, . the kitchen is aware of my allergy, I do not want…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for two of nine sampled residents (Resident 6 and Resident 83), when Resident 6 and Resident 83's copy of the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST - a medical order signed by both the patient and medical provider that specifies the types of medical treatment a patient wishes to receive toward the end of life) were incomplete.This failure had the potential for Resident 6 and Resident 83's decisions regarding lifesaving treatment options and end of life wishes to not be honored.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 1:20 p.m. with Resident 6 in Resident 6's room, Resident 6 was observed dressed and lying in bed. Resident 6 stated she did not know how long she was in the facility or why she was there. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR - a summary of information…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for four of 14 sampled residents (Resident 58, Resident 17, Resident 31, and Resident 59) when:1. Resident 58's foley catheter drainage tubing (a tube that is inserted into the urinary bladder to collect urine into a bag) was touching the floor and Resident 58's urine drainage bag (a bag that collects urine from a urinary catheter) was on the floor.2. The connector end of the feeding bag tubing for Resident 17 was left open to air and did not have a tube cover cap.3. The appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was not worn during care for Resident 31 who was on contact precaution.4. Resident 59's Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC line, tube inserted into a vein for medications, fluids, or nutrition to be delivered over weeks or months) dressing change was not completed within 7 days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 14 residents (Resident 69 and Resident 93) had the ability to call for staff assistance through the call system (a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area) when:1. Resident 69's call system was not working.2. Resident 93 was unable to reach her call button to access the call system while in their bed. These failures had the potential for Resident 69 and Resident 93 to not receive assistance or help from staff when needed and put Resident 69 and Resident 93 at risk of injury, harm and not having their needs met.Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/5/2026 at 9:14 a.m. with Resident 69 in Resident 69's room, Resident 69 was observed dressed, lying in bed. Resident 69 stated she had been at the facility since January 2026 due to a bad fall. Resident 69 stated her right arm was weak and she was unable to move her right leg. Resident 69…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to document changes in resident health status according to professional standards of practice and the facility's policy and procedure titled Licensed Nurse Weekly Progress Notes, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility nursing staff did not accurately assess, document and monitor Resident 1's skin changes that included multiple bruising to bilateral (both) upper thighs, knees, buttocks and right ankle. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for further injury, potential for falls, increased pain and further skin breakdown. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for Parkinsons Disease (disorder that causes nerve…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice and follow the policy and procedure titled, Referrals to Outside Services, Resident Rights and NP04 Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning for two of five sampled residents (Residents 2 and Resident 3) when: 1. Licensed Nurse (LN) did not develop a care plan when Resident 2 refused all showers from 1/26/26-2/19/26.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2 developing wounds and infections.2. Social Service department did not provide Resident 3 with transportation to his urology [a specialized branch of medicine that focus on diseases of the male and female urinary tract (the body's drainage system for removing waste and extra fluid, acting as a filter to produce, transport, store, and release urine)] appointment to assess removing his urinary catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) for discharge and Resident 3 missed his appointment.This failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary services for activities of daily living to maintain personal and oral hygiene for three of four sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3), when the facility staff did not provide oral care or grooming to Resident 1, Resident 2 and Resident 3 daily. These failures resulted in Resident 1, Resident 2 and Resident 3 to feel unclean and placed residents at risk for loss of dignity and potential tooth decay, oral, respiratory and skin infections.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for hemiplegia (weakness or complete loss of movement in the arm, leg, and sometimes face on that side) affecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedures Medication Storage, Disposal of Medications and Medication Related Supplies and have a secure medication destruction bin (MDB- a bin for unused medications that are set to be destroyed) for two of two medication rooms (Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] and Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]), when the medication destruction bins' lids were not sealed. This failure had the potential for drug diversion (when healthcare providers obtain or use prescription medicines illegally) and overall unsafe medication practices. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/8/25 at 10:58 a.m., with the Nurse Supervisor (NS) 2 in the second-floor medication room, the medication room had a MDB with a lid that was loose and crooked. The MDB lid was not sealed. The NS 2 stated the lid was not secure to the bin and staff could have taken medications out of it. The NS 2 stated narcotics (highly addictive drug used for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store drugs in a safe manner for two of two medication rooms (Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] and Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]), when seven pills (Five in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER] and two in Medication room [ROOM NUMBER]) were found on the floor without packaging or labels. This failure had the potential for drug diversion (when healthcare providers obtain or use prescription medicines illegally) and overall unsafe medication practices. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/8/25 at 10:58 a.m., with the Nurse Supervisor (NS) 2 in the second-floor medication room, the medication room had five different (shapes and colors) unidentifiable pills on the floor. The NS 2 stated there should not have been pills on the floor. The NS 2 stated the pills were unidentifiable (impossible to recognize) and could be any medication the facility provided, even a narcotic (highly addictive drug used for treating pain). The NS 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the meal served on 1/7/25 reflected the menu items for 49 of 54 residents on the first floor (Resident 122, 73, 66, 34, 109, 88, 110, 69, 7, 84, 79, 3, 31, 96, 70, 61, 130, 131, 126, 37, 59, 105, 72, 111, 113, 108, 114, 64, 103, 65, 6, 8, 24, 39, 13, 60, 92, 23, 133, 20, 14, 15, 112, 86, 119, 48, 78, 101, 42) when residents received an alternate food for lunch on 1/7/25 due to the kitchen ran out of spinach bake. The facility failed to ensure the food served to the majority of residents on the first floor reflected the menu items served to other residents. The facility did not ensure sufficient food was cooked to serve the main menu items to all residents. This failure resulted in Residents 122, 73, 66, 34, 109, 88, 110, 69, 7, 84, 79, 3, 31, 96, 70, 61, 130, 131, 126, 37, 59, 105, 72, 111, 113, 108, 114, 64, 103, 65, 6, 8, 24, 39, 13, 60, 92, 23, 133, 20, 14, 15, 112, 86, 119, 48, 78, 101, 42 not receiving the same food distributed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-10 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide meals at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community or in accordance with resident requests, preferences for 141 of 141 sampled residents, when the lunch meal on 1/7/25 was served 30 to 45 minutes after the scheduled mealtime and the dinner meal on 1/10/25 was served 50 minutes after the scheduled mealtime. These failures had the potential to trigger resident feelings of anger and frustration which could diminish a resident's ability to eat resulting in a resident not meeting hydration and nutritional needs which could lead to unexpected weight loss or delay the timely recovery of clinical illness or injury. Findings: During an interview on 1/6/25 at 10:17 a.m. with Resident 3 on the 1st Floor, Resident 3 stated the meals were served late and wished meals would be served on time. Resident 3 stated lunch is typically served around 2:00 p.m., dinner served late around 7:30 p.m. During a record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP-a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's needs) for two of 12 sampled residents (Residents 94 and 63) when: 1. Licensed nurses (LNs) did not implement CP for Resident 94's foley catheter (a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into your bladder to drain urine) to monitor signs and symptoms of infectious disease process. This failure had the potential for Resident 94 to develop an infection and placed an increased risk on Resident 94's health and safety. 2. Resident 63 did not have a comprehensive care plan for his diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after witnessing or experiencing a terrifying event). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 63 to not received the care needed for his PTSD which could result in serious mental health. Findings: 1. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure (P&P) to ensure the Care Plans (CP) were reviewed and revised for five of 23 sampled residents (Resident 45, 67, 74, 76, and 392) when: 1. The CP for Resident 45 was not reviewed and revised after Resident 45 had a fall and was sent to the acute care hospital. This failure placed Resident 45 at an increased risk for additional falls. 2. Resident 67's care plan was not updated and revised when his pressure ulcer (a wound which develops as a result of prolonged pressure to one area) progressed to a stage III (a deep skin wound where the full thickness of the skin is damaged, exposing the fatty layer underneath, but not reaching the muscle or bone) wound. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 67 to not receive the wound care needed. 3. Resident 74's care plan was not updated and revised for significant weight loss of above five percent in 30 days. This failure had the potential for Resident 74's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of quality were met in accordance with the comprehensive care plan and facility policies and procedures for four of nine sampled residents (Residents 74, 67, 55 and 392) when: 1. Resident 67's change of condition and Nutritional Assessment for a facility acquired pressure ulcer (a wound which develops as a result of prolonged pressure to one area), Stage 2 pressure ulcer to right thigh and Stage 3 pressure ulcer to left buttock were not assessed. This failure had the potential for Resident 67's wounds to worsen which could result in more serious health condition. 2. Resident 74's change of condition for significant weight loss above five percent in one month was not developed and Interdisciplinary team (IDT-group of people with different areas of expertise working together to achieve a common goal) note was not completed. This failure had the potential to put Resident 74 at risk for further weight loss. 3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature when 5 of 32 sampled residents (Resident 3, 67, 74, 96 and 112) complained of the food being served cold, undercooked and without flavor. This failure had the potential for Residents 3, 67, 74, 96 and 112 not eating their meal and placed their nutritional status at risk which could potentially lead to weight loss. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/6/25 at 8:47 a.m. with Resident 74, in Resident 74's room, Resident 74 was sitting on her walker seat in her room, alert and oriented and understood the questions clearly. Resident was clean and well groomed. Resident 74 stated she had been at the facility since June of last year. Resident 74 stated she could not tolerate the food at the facility. Resident 74 stated the food was undercooked and cold. Resident 74 stated her stomach was weak and anything could come up just looking at the food. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public when: 1. Five of 23 residents' rooms on the first floor were observed with non functioning vertical blinds (window coverings made of long, vertical slats that are attached to a headrail and can be opened and closed by sliding along a track). These failures had the potential of violating residents rights to their privacy. 2. A hole measuring approximately 2.5 X 2.5 inches on the wall with exposed wiring. This failure had the potential to place residents and other staff in an unsafe environment which had the potential to lead to electrocutions and pest infestation. 3. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s ceiling light fixture did not have light bulb and Resident 55's overhead light had missing light bulb not providing adequate lighting to meet the needs of Resident 55. This failure resulted in Resident 55's room having decreased visibility resulting in eye straining, and had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for two of three sampled residents (Residents 69 and 191) when Residents 69 and Resident 191's urinary catheter (flexible tube inserted into bladder to drain urine) bag were uncovered and visible to other residents and visitors to see and not in accordance with facility's policy and procedure. This failure resulted in the violation of Residents 69 and 191's right to privacy and dignity. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/6/25 at 7:50 a.m. in Resident 69's room, Resident 69 was lying in bed and observed with contractures (stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion) of right arms and left legs. Resident 69 had a urinary bag connected to urostomy (surgical opening in the abdomen to allow urine to drain from the body) and placed on top of Resident 69's bed. Resident 69's urinary catheter bag was uncovered and placed on top of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the right to self-administer medication for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 92), when Resident 92 had not been assessed for her ability to keep her albuterol (a medication which makes it easier to breathe) inhaler at bedside and self-administer it as needed. This failure violated Resident 92's right to self-administer her own medication and had the potential to cause her to experience breathing difficulties as a result of not having her inhaler nearby. Findings: During a review of resident 92's admission Record (AR- a document which provides resident contact details, a brief medical history level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 1/9/25, the AR indicated, Resident 92 was her own responsible party (person designated to make decisions regarding treatment) and was admitted with asthma (lung disease which makes breathing difficult as a result of swelling in the airway), and shortness of breath (the feeling of not being able to breathe normally or deeply enough). During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change of Condition Assessment (an assessment which captures a major decline or improvement in a resident's condition) in the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessment for one of five sampled residents (Resident 67) when Resident 67 developed a facility acquired Stage 3 pressure ulcer (a wound which develops as a result of prolonged pressure to one area) to left buttock and did not have a significant change of condition assessment in accordance with facility's policy and procedure. This failure placed Resident 67 at risk for further decline in health including worsening of her wounds. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/6/25 at 10:45 a.m. with Resident 67, in Resident 67's room. Resident 67 was observed lying in bed watching television, clean and well groomed. Resident 67 was alert and oriented and understood questions clearly. Resident 67 stated she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Level l Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- The State is required to ensure that every person entering a Medicaid certified Nursing Facility [NF] receives a admission level screening and if necessary a level ll evaluation to ensure that their NF residence is appropriate and to identify what specialized services they may need) was completed accurately for one of six sampled residents (Resident 17) when Resident 17 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] and an updated PASRR was not completed. This failure had the potential for Resident 17 not to receive the necessary and appropriate psychiatric treatment and evaluation in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record [AR], dated 1/9/25, the AR indicated, Resident 17 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Depressive disorder (mental health condition that involves a persistent low mood and loss of interest in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete personal hygiene and follow the policy and procedure (P&P) Grooming Care of the Fingernails and Toenails for one of one sampled residents (Resident 94), when staff did not cut Resident 94's fingernails on his contractured (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, or nearby tissues that limits the range of movement of a joint or body part) right and left hands. This failure resulted in Resident 94 to have long fingernails that were growing into his hand with the potential to cause pain and infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 94's admission Record (AR) the AR indicated, Resident 94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included paraplegia (the inability to voluntarily move the lower parts of the body), contracture of the left and right hand (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, or nearby tissues that limits the range of movement of a joint or body part) and muscle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care and follow the policy and procedure (P&P) Grooming Care of the Fingernails and Toenails for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 40), when staff did not cut Resident 40's toenails. This failure resulted in Resident 40 having thick and long toenails and placed resident 40 at risk for an infection and pain when ambulating. Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (AR), dated 1/10/25, the AR indicated, Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength) and unspecified dementia (the loss of brain functioning, such as, thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). During a review of Resident 40's Minimum Data Set (MDS -a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], Resident 40's MDS assessment indicated, Resident 40's Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven sampled residents (Resident 92) was provided food that accommodated her allergies and preferences, when Resident 92 had a listed dislike and allergy for lactose (sugar present in milk) products and was served milk on 1/7/25. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 92 to experience distress and an allergic reaction if she drank the milk. Findings: During a review of resident 92's admission Record (AR- a document which provides resident contact details, a brief medical history level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 1/9/25, the AR indicated, Resident 92 had an allergy to lactose and was admitted with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD- a condition where stomach contents flow back up into the throat), asthma (lung disease which makes breathing difficult as a result of swelling in the airway), and shortness of breath (the feeling of not being able to breathe normally or deeply enough). During a review of Resident 92's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a mechanical soft diet (a diet that involves only foods that are physically soft with the goal of reducing or eliminating the need to chew the food) according to the physician order for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 83) when, Resident 83 did not receive mechanical soft diet per physician's order and was served whole kernel corn with her meal. This failure placed resident 83 at risk for choking and aspiration (when food, liquid, or other material enters a person's airway and eventually the lungs by accident). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/6/25 at 8:24 a.m. with Resident 83 in Resident 83's room, Resident 83 was observed lying in bed wearing a gown. Resident 83 stated she had been at the facility for three years. Resident 83 stated the food served was always cold and tasted bad. Resident 83 stated she had no teeth, and the facility gave her food she could not chew. Resident 83 stated she was on a mechanical soft diet, but the facility did not always chop her food.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records in accordance with facility's policy and procedure (P&P) and professional standards of practices for one of five sampled residents (Resident 137) when the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done at the end-of life) was not accurate and complete. Sections C for POLST form which included -artificially administered nutrition, physician signature, physician license, physician phone number, and date was incomplete. This failure had the potential for Resident 137's decisions regarding treatment options and end-of-life wishes to not be honored. Findings: During a review of Resident 137's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of two sampled residents (Resident 55) when Resident 55's oxygen nasal cannula (O2 NC- tube that directs oxygen into the nose) tubing and nebulizer mask (a mask used to inhale liquid medication in the form of a mist to treat lung conditions) were laying on the residents nightstand not in a protective bag. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 55's O2 NC tubing and nebulizer mask getting bacteria and potentially resulting in a respiratory infection (an illness that inflames the respiratory system, which includes the throat, nose, airways, and lungs). Findings: During a review of Residents 55's admission Records (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an admission diagnosis which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD a condition of the airways and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which met professional standards of quality for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 1) when, Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN)s did not administer oxygen (O2- a colorless, odorless and tasteless gas essential for life) per physician's order for Resident 1 and physician ordered parameters for O2 administration were not followed. LVNs did not document the administration of O2 treatment for Resident 1 in Treatment Administration Record (TAR). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to receive inadequate amount of O2 which could affect her health and well-being. Finding: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) (a document containing demographic information), undated, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (body has trouble controlling blood sugar) Adult Failure to Thrive, Shortness of Breath, Hypoxemia (absence of enough oxygen in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-31 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — pattern
    Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free form involuntary seclusion not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 closed the door to Resident 1 and Resident 2's room while the needs of both residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) were not met. This failure resulted in isolation for Resident 1 and Resident 2 and their basic care needs were unmet. Resident 1 expressed feeling sad, unheard and angry when she did not receive the assistance to leave her room to a quiet area of choice and was instead left in her room with Resident 2, while Resident 2 was yelling with closed door. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/31/24 at 9:16 a.m. with Resident 1, in Resident 1's room. Resident 1 was observed crying while recalling events that transpired on 7/13/24. Resident 1 stated on the night of 7/13/24, Resident 2 was experiencing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe environment for 28 of 134 residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 9, Resident 10, Resident 11, Resident 12, Resident 13, Resident 14, Resident 15, Resident 16, Resident 17, Resident 18, Resident 19, Resident 20, Resident 21, Resident 22, Resident 23, Resident 24, Resident 25, Resident 26, Resident 27 and Resident 28) when 15 resident rooms were observed to have loose window screws that were used to secure the windows in place from opening more than three inches (unit of measure) on the second and third floors of the facility. This failure placed residents in an unsafe environment which could potentially lead to an avoidable resident injury. Findings: During an interview on 7/12/24 at 8:45 a .m., with the administrator (ADM). The ADM stated that Resident 1 had opened the window in her room located on the second floor and jumped off to the ground on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep the facility free of pests for 181 out of 181 residents, when on 7/9/2024 the dish washing station was observed with roaches crawling in the sink with dirty dishes, numerous roaches crawling up the walls and dishwasher. The floor to the dish washing room had roaches crawling into the dish racks located near the sink on the floor where dirty dishes were placed to go into the dishwasher. The clean dish area had roaches crawling around the counter and wall. The dishwasher itself had roaches swimming in the water inside. The walls of the dishwashing area had roaches nesting in the corners. This failure resulted in an unsanitary work environment where food was prepared and had the potential to cause harm to 181(the census during the survey) residents due to cross contamination and transmission of infections from cockroaches' infestation that could place residents at risk for food borne…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide needed care according to professional standards of practice for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 did not receive pain medication according to physician ' s order for three days. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate pain management for Resident 1. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/11/24 at 9:31 a.m. with Resident 1 in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was observed lying in bed guarding her abdomen with hands and complaining of abdominal pain. Resident 1 stated she did not want to talk at the moment regarding alleged incident and continued to complain of abdominal pain. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice when one of nine sampled residents (Resident 1) had dry, cracked peeling skin to his left foot and there was no documented weekly skin assessment that included documentation of Resident 1's feet appearance by the licensed nurses since 9/9/23. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's left foot treatment status and progress to worsen. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Records, dated 2/20/17, the admission Records indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (a condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), adult failure to thrive, and chronic venous hypertension with ulcer to left lower extremity (increase in blood pressure causes ulcers). During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary, dated 9/1/23, the Order Summary indicated, .Left Lower Extremity Edema [fluid trapped in the body's tissues] with Drainage: cleanse entire lower leg with normal saline, pat dry with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to serve palatable food for 2 of 2 sampled test trays. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 122 of 122 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings included: A review of the facility's planned menu for the week of 10/02/2023 through 10/08/2023, revealed the following meals were planned: - 10/03/2023 Lunch: chicken with rosemary sauce, boiled red potatoes, seasoned peas, cornbread, and ice cream. - 10/04/2023 Lunch: beef cubes with mushrooms, egg noodles, seasoned spinach, tossed green salad, and spiced applesauce cake. During an interview on 10/02/2023 at 9:25 AM, Resident #73 stated the food was terrible and the alternative menu consisted of three other items residents could choose from, but those were also bad. A review of Resident #73's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/04/2023, revealed Resident #73 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #31) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) were treated with dignity during mealtimes. Specifically, facility staff placed a meal tray in front of Resident #31, left the room, and continued to deliver trays to other residents before returning to feed Resident #31. In addition, Resident #31's roommates were served and consumed their meals before Resident #31 received their meal tray. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled, Dining Program, revised 01/01/2012, revealed Purpose To ensure that the Facility serves meals in a timely manner, provides residents with adequate supervision and/or assistance during meal times, and maintains adequate nutrition and hydration of residents. A review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised 01/01/2012, revealed, Employees are to treat all residents with kindness, respect and dignity and honor the exercise of residents' rights. A review of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident # 31) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) had a care plan that addressed the level of assistance the resident required for ADLs. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, revised in November 2018, revealed, Purpose To ensure that a comprehensive person centered care plan is developed for each resident. Policy It is the policy of this Facility to provide person-centered, comprehensive and interdisciplinary care that reflects best practice standards for meeting health, safety, psychosocial, behavioral, and environmental needs of residents in order to obtain or maintain the highest physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The policy further specified, IV. Comprehensive Care Plan a. Within 7 days from the completion of the comprehensive MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessment, the comprehensive care plan will be developed. All goals objectives, interventions,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #62) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for smoking did not use an electronic cigarette device (e-cigarette; vape product) in their room. In addition, staff failed to ensure Resident #62's Smoking and Safety assessment reflected the resident's use of vape products, despite staff's knowledge the resident vaped. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Smoking by Residents, revised in January 2017, revealed, Purpose To provide a safe environment for residents, staff, and visitors. Policy It is the policy of this facility to accommodate residents who desire to smoke by taking reasonable precautions, providing a safe environment for them, and protecting the non-smoking residents. Smoking whether it is traditional tobacco or herbs (does not include marijuana or its derivatives) smoked in cigarettes, pipes, cigars or electronic cigarettes are governed by this policy. Procedure Definitions: A. Smoking is the inhalation of the smoke of burning tobacco or other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed a physician's order for water flushes for 1 (Resident #102) of 1 resident in the facility with a gastrostomy tube (a surgically placed device used to administer supplemental feeding, hydration, or medication directly to the stomach). Specifically, Resident #102 was ordered to receive a 200 milliliters (mL) water flush every four hours (q4h), but during 2 of 4 observations, the resident only received 150 mL q4h. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Tube Feeding/ TPN [total parental nutrition], revised on 06/01/2014, revealed, Purpose: To ensure that the Facility meets the nutritional guidelines and resident's nutritional requirements per physician orders. A review of Resident #102's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 10/25/2022. Per the admission Record, Resident #102 had a medical history that included diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids) following cerebral infarction (stroke),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to serve meals according to the planned menu. Specifically, planned menu items were not provided to all residents who received food from the kitchen for 2 of the 6 meals observed during the recertification survey. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Menus, revised on 04/01/2014, revealed, The Dietary Manager will develop menus in collaboration with the Dietitian. Menus are to be designed in consideration of resident preferences, Dietary Department resources, and seasonal availability of foods. Daily menus will include planning for three meals and an evening snack. Selective menu plans are based on weekly cycles. Menus should be adjusted seasonally and allow for specialty food items, typically served during holidays. The policy further indicated, Food served should adhere to the written menu. A review of the facility's planned menu for the week of 10/02/2023 through 10/08/2023, revealed the following meals were planned: - 10/02/2023 Lunch: homestyle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$88,049 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $12,256 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
  • $70,500 — penalty dated 2024-07-12
  • $5,293 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-11 for 47 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FRESNO BM, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 02/01/2018
KATZ FRESNO HEALTHCARE PARTNERSHIPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 02/01/2018
BERKOWITZ FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2009
NAROD, MAXIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2009
ROCKPORT ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/21/2025
GALLEY, CHADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/05/2024
MALLEY, ROMANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/10/2010
RECHNITZ, SHLOMOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2009
ERETZ FRESNO SKILLED NURSING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/30/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.2M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 10%Other / private 34%

This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$336per resident / day
operating cost
$10,218per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$266per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055626. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next