No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Gardena Convalescent Center

14819 S. Vermont, Gardena, CA 90247 · For profit - Corporation · 74 certified beds · (310) 532-9460 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (310) 532-9460 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Jan 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1045 W Redondo Beach Blvd
Pharmacy
1045 W Redondo Beach Blvd Ste 140 · (310) 532-0222 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
14823 S Vermont Ave · (310) 327-9111 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1239 W Rosecrans Ave · (424) 329-3057 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
14527 S Vermont Ave · (310) 323-8486

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.6%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.9%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.5%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.6%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.4%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.2%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control2.1%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.0%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.7%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.4%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.8%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.632.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.041.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.29hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.1%CMS range 46.9–67.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.8–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge77.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting92.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge81.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.9–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.401.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.39
RN hours/ resident / day
1.28
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.49
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.17
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
25.4%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 59.7 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-13)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a pain care plan for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 not receiving specific care interventions related to Resident 1's pain.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Unilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of the left hip (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), left hip artificial joint, and anxiety disorder (a mental health condition defined by intense, excessive, and persistent worry or fear about everyday situations).During a review of Resident 1's physician order, dated 5/18/2026, the physician order indicated to administer Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (a pain medication) 10-325 milligram (mg, a unit of measurement) one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for moderate to severe pain.During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1.Ensure 36 out of 36 narcotic destruction log sheets were signed by the Director of Nursing (DON) and the facility's pharmacist consultant. This deficient practice had the potential to result in narcotic diversion (the illegal transfer of prescription drugs, specifically controlled substances like opioids, from their intended, legal purpose to an unauthorized person or for illegal use).Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review, on 3/11/2026 at 10:32 a.m., with the DON, the DON stated there were 34 individual residents-controlled drug record that she did not sign on 1/30/2026 during drug destruction with RPH. The DON stated all discontinued narcotics were kept in a locked drawer inside of her office. The DON stated if a narcotic was discontinued, a licensed nurse would come to her office, and both (DON and license nurse) would count the remaining medications. The DON stated she would do a monthly narcotic destruction with the pharmacy consultant. The DON stated she and the pharmacy consultant would count…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Label with an opened date and remove expired ipratropium with albuterol (a combination medication used to treat and prevent shortness of breath) inhalation solution for three of three sampled residents (Resident 16, Resident 20, and Resident 72) in Medication cart 1. This deficient practice had the potential to result in prolonged use and loss of strength of the expired inhalation solution and can lead to ineffective treatment of respiratory symptoms for Resident 16, 20 and 72.Findings:During a review of Resident 16's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 16 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 16's diagnoses included pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), and congestive heart failure ([CHF] - a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to:1. Ensure food items stored in the kitchen walk in refrigerator were maintained in a safe and sanitary manner by allowing expired hot dog buns and corn tortillas to remain stored and available for use. This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents being served expired food products.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/10/2026 at 8:40 a.m. with the [NAME] in the kitchen walk in refrigerator observed was an opened bag of [NAME] brand corn tortillas 80 count with an expiration date of 12/21/2025 and 5 bags of [NAME] Deli 16 count hot dog buns with 3 with expiration dates of 1/31/2026 and 2 with expiration dates 2/2/2026. The [NAME] stated the hot dog buns and tortillas should not be in the refrigerated stored with other food they should be thrown out. During an Interview on 3/10/26 at 11:09 a.m. with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), the DSS stated having the expired food could expose residents to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1. Ensure the call light (a device used by a resident to signal his or her need for assistance from a staff) was within reach for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 39).This failure had the potential for increased risk of falls, delayed response to emergencies, and unmet basic needs for Resident 39. Findings:During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 39 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 39's diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), and congestive heart failure ([CHF] - a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling).During a review of Resident 39's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/30/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 39 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1.Ensure personal information of residents was protected by not throwing the protected information (PHI - any health information that can be used to identify specific individual which must remain confidential to prevent harmful consequences) in the trash can without shredding.This failure had the potential to violate residents rights and privacy.During an observation on 3/12/2026 at 1:45 p.m. observed meal tickets in the trash by the dishwashing machine area. The meal tickets contained resident names, room numbers and diet types, texture level, liquid consistency level and likes and dislikes.During an interview on 3/12/2026 at 1:50 p.m. with the Dietary Aide (DA) the DA stated the meal cards have patient information names, diet type, and room number and I should not have been thrown in the trash they should have been shredded or given to the supervisor.During an interview on 3/12/2026 at 1:50 p.m. with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS) the DSS stated I have staff put the meal tickets on the side and I take…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the quarterly (every 3 months) Minimum Data Set Assessment ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 2) was completed within the required timeframe. This deficient practice could potentially affect the care services of Resident 2.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 4's diagnoses included congestive heart failure ([CHF] - a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate and rhythm), and hypertension ([HTN] - high blood pressure).During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/11/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 2 lacks the capacity to make medical decisions.During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/11/2026 at 12:57 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) was completed accurately for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice resulted in incorrect data being transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and had the potential to negatively affect the plan of care and delivery of care and services for Resident 2.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 4's diagnoses included congestive heart failure ([CHF] - a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate and rhythm), and hypertension ([HTN] - high blood pressure).During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/11/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 2 lacks the capacity to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of one sampled resident (Resident 3) by failing to: 1. Obtain a medical order clearance for tooth extraction (removal of a tooth) for Resident 3 as recommended by the dentist. This deficient practice had the potential to put Resident 3 at risk for oral infection, pain, and weight loss.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 3's diagnoses included pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), and Diabetes Mellitus ([DM] - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/21/2026, the H&P indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 36), assessed as being at risk for elopement (leaving the facility without permission) wore a ROAM Alert device (an electronic safety device worn by a resident that triggers an alarm if the resident attempts to exit the building) ordered by the physician to notify staff of potential elopement. This failure had the potential to allow a resident to leave the facility unsupervised and without staff awareness, placing the resident at risk of harm or injury.During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (face sheet), the face sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 36 on 7/31/2023 with diagnoses including homelessness, syncope and collapse (a temporary loss of consciousness caused by a sudden decrease in blood flow to the brain resulting in fainting) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 39) who has a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ([PICC] - a thin flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm above the right side of the heart, used to give intravenous fluids, blood transfusions, and medications) was placed on Enhanced Barrier Precaution ([EBP] - an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities). This failure had the potential to increase the risk of infection and cross-contamination (the transfer of bacteria, viruses, microorganisms, or other harmful substances from one surface to another through improper or unsanitary equipment, procedures, or products) among residents and staff.Findings:During a review of Resident 39's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (Resident 1), was provided with a safe and hazard-free environment while providing care. This deficient practice had the potential to cause severe injuries to Resident 1 including hospitalization and death.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/9/2025 at 12:30 p.m. with Resident 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1's right upper cheek was observed slightly swollen and purple in color and the right elbow had a dime size abrasion (scratch). Resident 1 was unable to move right upper and lower extremity. Resident 1's speech was slurred but Resident was able to communicate with simple words. Resident 1 stated she fell in the facility while the nurse was in the room and was sent to the hospital. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) had the specific competencies, and skill sets necessary to care for one of four residents (Resident 1), by failing to report Resident 1's alleged fall incident. This deficient practice resulted in a delay in Resident 1's treatment/evaluation. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and last readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included nondisplaced fracture of the left tibial spine (a break that has not shifted or separated at the top of the tibia bone in the lower leg near the knee), traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness (a serious condition where blood pools between the brain and its outer protective layer (the dura) after a head injury, potentially causing pressure on the brain), and end stage renal disease ([ESRD], is the final, permanent stage of chronic kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) glucose (the process of measuring the amount of sugar in a patient ' s blood) was checked after returning to the facility after being out on pass. This deficient practice of not checking the blood sugar after returning to the facility had the potential for Resident 1 exacerbate (a worsening of a medical condition that increases symptoms and may require hospitalization) his diabetes (a chronic condition characterized by high blood sugar levels). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 ' s diagnoses included fall (an unplanned descent to the floor with or without injury to the patient), diabetes mellitus ([DM]- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] -a chronic lung disease causing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) had a care plan for non-compliance (when a patient don't follow the rules, regulations, or advice that ' s been set in place) when out on pass ([OOP] a patient is temporarily allowed to leave the facility for a specified period of time, with the expectation of returning). This deficient practice of not developing a care plan (a document that summarizes a person ' s health needs, current treatments, and desired outcomes) for Resident 1 ' s non-compliance had the potential to place the resident at risk for injury and not be continuously monitored for diabetes mellitus([DM] - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 ' s diagnoses included fall (an unplanned descent to the floor with or without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident1) had a plan in place after being identified as a high risk for falls (a patient has a significantly increased likelihood of experiencing a fall due to various factors like poor balance, muscle weakness, which could potentially cause physical harm if they do fall) for continuous supervision and monitoring while out on pass ([OOP] a patient is temporarily allowed to leave the facility for a specified period of time, with the expectation of returning). This deficient practice of not having a plan in place for continuous supervision and monitoring had the potential risk for Resident 1 to fall while out on pass. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 ' s diagnoses included fall (an unplanned descent to the floor with or without injury to the patient), diabetes mellitus ([DM]- a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespread
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1.Ensure four of six sampled residents' (Residents 15, 30, 37, and 38) Medication Regimen Review ([MRR]- a review of medications to identify problems/errors) was completed monthly. This deficient practice placed Residents 15, 30, 37, and 38 at risk of not having medication irregularities identified. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 15's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/20/2011 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), muscle weakness, and end stage renal disease (irreversible kidney failure). During a review of Resident 15's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/19/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 15 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 12/2/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 15's cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized person-centered care plan (a document that summarizes a person's health condition, care needs, and current treatments) with measurable objectives, timeframe, and interventions to meet the residents needs for two of two sampled residents (Residents 58 and 167) by failing to: 1. Ensure a care plan for out on pass was develop for Resident 58. 2. Ensure a care plan with interventions for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ([PICC] - a thin flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm above the right side of the heart, used to give intravenous fluids, blood transfusions, and medications) line was develop for Resident 167. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of care and services for Residents 58 and 167. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 58's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0555 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure resident was involved in decision making and notified in change of physician for one of one sampled resident (Resident 52). This failure had violated Resident 52's resident rights to choose her own physician. Findings: During a review of Resident 52's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated, Resident 52's diagnoses included left hip osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), hypertension ([HTN] - high blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (a condition where there are high levels of fats, or lipids, in the blood). During a review of Resident 52's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/21/2024, the H&P indicated, Resident 52 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 52's Minimum Data Set…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Implement the facility's policy and procedures on reporting an unusual occurrence when Resident 58 left the facility and did not return. This deficient practice had the potential to result in serious harm, injuries and death. Findings: During a review of Resident 58's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 58 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection), schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and acute kidney failure (a sudden loss of kidney function that prevents the kidneys from filtering waste and regulating electrolytes and fluids in the body). During a review of Resident 58's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/4/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 58 had the capacity to understand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to: 1. Report to California Department of Public Health (CDPH) of resident leaving and not returning to the facility on [DATE] for one of two sampled residents (Resident 58). This deficient practice resulted in the delay of investigation by the CDPH. Findings: During a review of Resident 58's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 58 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection), schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and acute kidney failure (a sudden loss of kidney function that prevents the kidneys from filtering waste and regulating electrolytes and fluids in the body). During a review of Resident 58's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/4/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 58 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a smoking safety assessment was completed for one of 6 sampled residents (Resident 48). 2. Ensure an assessment was completed before going out on pass for one of 2 sampled residents (Resident 58). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a safety hazard for Resident 48 and serious harm for Resident 58. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 48's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 48 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included epilepsy (seizures), schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), nicotine dependence (a chronic disease that causes people to compulsively use nicotine) and encephalopathy (a brain disorder that affects brain function or structure). During a review of Resident 48's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) was completed accurately for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 36). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the plan of care and delivery of care and services for Resident 36. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated, Resident 36's diagnoses included pressure ulcer/injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) of sacral region (large, triangle-shaped bone in the lower spine that forms part of the pelvis), sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] - a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing). During a review of Resident 36's History and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Submit a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 21) which included an existing psychiatric diagnosis. This deficient practice resulted in a delay of Resident 21 receiving a PASSR II evaluation for mental health needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record (Face sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 21 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows and manic highs) heart disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), and muscle weakness. During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a Level 2 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) evaluation was obtained for one of six sampled residents (Resident 48). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inappropriate placement and unidentified specialized services for Resident 48. Findings: During a review of Resident 48's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 48 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included epilepsy (seizures), schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), nicotine dependence (a chronic disease that causes people to compulsively use nicotine) and encephalopathy (a brain disorder that affects brain function or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure physician orders were carried out for one of 6 sampled residents (Resident 31). 2. Provide services which meet professional standards of quality regarding smoking safety for one of 6 sampled residents (Resident 48). This deficient practice had the potential to result in skin breakdown for Resident 31 and a smoking accident for Resident 48. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 31's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 31 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spinal column that occurs over time, putting pressure on the spinal cord and nerves), chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood properly), acute kidney failure (a sudden loss of kidney function that occurs when the kidneys are no longer able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, by failing to: 1. Assess and monitor one of 6 sampled residents smoking safety (Resident 48). This deficient practice had the potential to result in serious harm due to smoking without supervision. 2. Ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 49) had their pain management referral processed timely. This deficient practice resulted in a delay in assessing, monitoring (Resident 48) and care to manage the pain of Resident 49. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 48's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 48 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included epilepsy (seizures), schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), nicotine dependence (a chronic disease that causes people to compulsively use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the low air loss mattress ([LALM] - a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure ulcer/injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) was set and maintained at the correct setting for one of two sampled residents (Resident 36). This deficient practice placed Resident 36 at risk for worsening of pressure ulcer/injury and further skin breakdown. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated, Resident 36's diagnoses included pressure ulcer/injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) of sacral region (large, triangle-shaped bone in the lower spine that forms part of the pelvis), sepsis (a life-threatening blood infection),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 37) received Restorative Nurse Assistant ([RNA]- a healthcare worker who helps residents improve and maintain function in physical abilities) services timely and five days a week as ordered. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 37 having a decline in function or development of contractures (a stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion). Findings: During a review of Resident 37's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), malnutrition (an imbalance of essential nutrients in the body), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 37's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/23/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 37 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure whether supervision was required during smoke breaks and ensure the environment was free from a fire hazard for one of 6 sampled residents (Resident 48). This deficient practice had the potential to result in an accidental fire in the facility and lead to residents' injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 48's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 48 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included epilepsy (seizures), schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), nicotine dependence (a chronic disease that causes people to compulsively use nicotine) and encephalopathy (a brain disorder that affects brain function or structure). During a review of Resident 48's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 1/10/2025, indicated Resident 48…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure dental services were provided for one of 6 sampled residents (Resident 110). This deficient practice had the potential to result in tooth decay, gum disease, bad breath and cavities. Findings: During a review of Resident 110's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 110 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dependence on oxygen, thrombocytopenia, anemia and benign prostatic hyperplasia. During a review of Resident 110's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), the MDS indicated Resident 110 cognitive skills were intact. The MDS indicated Resident 58 required substantial to maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves) such as toileting needs, showering and upper/lower body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure a resident who received hemodialysis ([HD] - a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) treatment received care in accordance with standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident 166) by failing to: 2. Ensure Resident 166's dialysis emergency kit (E-KIT - supplies to help meet the needs of a dialysis resident in the event of an emergency) was readily available at the bedside, in case of excessive bleeding from the dialysis site. This deficient practice had the potential to result in staff inability to manage and control the bleeding from Resident 166's dialysis site in the event of an emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 166's admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission Record indicated 166 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure it was free of a medication error rate of five percent (5%) or greater, as evidenced by the identification of two out of 28 medication opportunities (observations during medication administration) for error, to yield a cumulative error rate of 7.14% for one of two sampled residents (Resident 167) observed during the medication administration facility task by failing to: 2. Administer Resident 167's Calcium Carbonate with Vitamin D (vitamin supplement, a mineral that builds and maintain strong bones and teeth, and for important physical functions such as muscle control and blood circulation) as prescribed by the physician and to monitor pulse rate (measurement of the heart rate, or the number of tines the heart beats per minute) prior to administration of Metoprolol Tartrate (medication used to treat high blood pressure) as ordered by the physician. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harm to Resident 167 by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Label with an opened date one vial (a small container, usually made of glass or plastic used to store liquids) 5 millimeter ([ml] - unit of measurement) of influenza vaccine (a vaccine that protects against the influenza virus) found from the facility's medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER] refrigerator. This deficient practice had the potential for harm to residents due to potential loss of strength of the influenza vaccine. 2. Remove two vials of unopened expired insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) from the facility's medication storage room [ROOM NUMBER] refrigerator for two of two sampled residents (Residents 14 and 15). This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of Resident 14 and 15 receiving expired insulin that could be ineffective in treating their blood sugar. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure dental services were provided for one of 6 sampled residents (Resident 6). This deficient practice had the potential to result in tooth decay, gum disease, bad breath and cavities. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's face sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the face sheet indicated Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms, usually due to a spinal cord injury), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and insomnia (trouble falling asleep or staying asleep). During a review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Provide one out of six sampled residents (Resident 37) with a therapeutic diet at lunch time as ordered. This deficient practice put Resident 37 at risk for further weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 37's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), malnutrition (an imbalance of essential nutrients in the body), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 37's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/23/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 37 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 11/6/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 37 has moderate cognitive (ability to think and understand) impairment. Resident 37 was dependent on staff with dressing, bathing, and toileting. Resident 37…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, and managed pain in a timely manner, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the quality of life of the affected resident. Findings: A review of Resident 3's Face Sheet dated 4/4/2024, indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including cellulitis of left lower limb (wound infection), phantom limb syndrome with pain (sensation patients experience after removal of limb, and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 3's, History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/22/2023, indicated Resident 3 did not have the capacity to understand and make own decisions. A review of Resident 3's MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 3 was able to understand and be understood by others. The MDS indicated Resident 3 required set up for eating, oral hygiene, and substantial assistance for toileting. Resident 3 was dependent for shower/bath, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, activities of daily living, for three of four residents (Residents 1, 3 and 4), were attended to, promptly. This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents developing skin breakdown and other needs not met. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included difficulty walking, muscle weakness, and hypertensive chronic kidney disease (high blood pressure caused by damage to the kidneys). During a review of Resident 1 ' s history and physical (H&P) dated 1/1/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the mental capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a review of Resident 1 ' s minimum data set ([MDS] a standardized care assessment and care screening tool), dated 1/30/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1 ' s cognitive skills (thought process) was moderately impaired and could understand and be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its Infection policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to report a Coronavirus disease ([Covid-19] a highly contagious illness caused by a virus that could easily spread from person to person) outbreak to the California Department of Public Health District Office (CDPH DO). This failure had the potential to result in the spread of Covid-19 cases in the facility and placed residents, staff and the community at risk for contracting the Covid 19 virus. Findings During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, and diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar). During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P) dated 8/24/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 3 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dignity bag (a bag used for privacy to cover and hold the urine collection bag so that it is not visible) was used to cover the urine collection bag for one of two residents (Resident 9). This deficient practice had the potential to cause embarrassment and affect Resident 9's self-worth and dignity. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record, dated 7/18/2023, the admission record indicated Resident 9 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, affecting all four limbs), anxiety disorder (a group of mental disorders characterized by significant feelings of fear), major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that once brought joy), and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set (MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure residents' call lighs devices were placed within the resident's reach for three out of four sampled residents (Residents 13, 51, 122). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay or an inability for the residents to obtain necessary care and services as needed. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, dated 7/18/2023, the admission record indicated Resident 13 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included failure to thrive (a state of decline and may be caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments; manifestations include weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity), hepatic encephalopathy (loss of brain function occurs when the liver is unable to remove toxins from the blood), end stage renal disease (ESRD - a stage where the kidneys can no longer support the body's needs for waste removal and fluid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Follow menu as written for nine residents on renal and regular diets. 2. Follow menu one of nine residents (Resident 54) by putting crunchy fish instead of baked fish plate. This deficiency had the potential for resident to receive the wrong carb and caloric intake when not following the menu, resulting meal dissatisfaction, decreased nutritional intake and weight loss and potentially alter the nutritional value of meals for residents. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 54's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 54 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 54's diagnoses included acute kidney failure (occurs when your kidneys suddenly become unable to filter waste products from your blood), gout (a type of inflammatory arthritis that causes pain and swelling in your joints). During a review of Resident 54's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/7/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure food preparation operations were conducted under sanitary conditions in the facility's kitchen for 54 of 62 residents by. 1. Failing to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during the preparation of meals. 2. Failing to ensure hairnets, gloves, and masks were worn while in the kitchen and during the preparation of meals. 3. Failing to ensure the kitchen was free of standing water on the kitchen equipment and the floor. 4. Failing to ensure there were no unopened foods or foods stored on the floor in the dry storage area. 5. Failing to ensure clean utensils were used to serve and prepare food. These deficient practices had the potential to put residents at risk by spreading illness, contaminating food, and causing the growth of microorganisms that could lead to food-borne illnesses (food poisoning). Findings: During the initial kitchen tour observation on 1/9/2024 at 8:56 a.m., observed the following: 1. Standing water on top of the juice machine and on the floor next to the juice machine.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures for two of two sampled residents (Resident 41, Resident 51) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 51's indwelling catheter (a tube that allows urine to drain from the bladder into a bag that is usually attached to the thigh) drainage bag was not touching the floor. 2. Ensure hand hygiene was performed after touching soiled items while performing wound care on Resident 41. These deficient practices resulted in contamination of the resident's care equipment and placed the residents at risk for infection and had the potential to spread infection that could delay the healing process and cause further complications for Resident 41. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 51's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to, acute chronic systolic heart failure (the heart does not pump efficiently or contract the way…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to honor resident's right to visit family members outside of the facility for one of one sampled resident (Resident 6). This deficient practice caused Resident 6 to miss time with his family during the Christmas holiday and had the potential to negatively impact his psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, dated 11/22/2023, the admission record indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included fracture (a break in the bone) of the occiput (back of the head), atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that can cause poor blood flow, leading to blood clots, heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not provide adequate blood flow to meet the body's needs) or stroke), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - age-associated prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty), epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that proper care and treatment services for oxygen (O2) were provided for two of two sampled residents (Resident 122 & 222). This deficient practice had the potential to cause inadequate oxygen therapy and respiratory distress for all residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 222's admission Record (Face Sheet), dated 1/2/2024, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 222 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including Heart failure (the heart does not pump efficiently or contract the way it should between heartbeats), Hypertensive emergency (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (high levels of sugar in the blood), Acute Kidney Failure (when your kidneys suddenly become unable to filter waste products from your blood), Arteriosclerosis of Aorta (when fat and calcium has built up in the inside wall of a large blood vessel called the aorta), Acute Respiratory Failure with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food served was palatable and attractive as voiced by one out of one sampled resident (Resident 46). This deficient practice had the potential to impact the residents' nutritional status and not meet the residents' desires to be served food they felt was palatable and attractive. Findings: During a review of Resident 46's admission records indicated Resident 46's was originally admitted to the facility 4/27/2023 and re-admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Transient ischemic attack [TIA] (a temporary blockage of blood flow to the brain), Vertebral Artery (arteries in the neck supply blood to the brain and spine), Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis ([Hemiplegia- refers to paralysis on one side of the body after a stroke] Hemiparesis [ weakness on one side of the body]), Hypertension ( when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high), Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (a noncancerous enlargement of the Prostate gland), Hyperlipidemia (too…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document the resident's approved out on pass (OOP) order to visit family for the Christmas holiday for one of one sampled resident (Resident 6). This deficient practice caused Resident 6 to miss spending time with his family during the Christmas holiday and had the potential to negatively impact Resident 6's psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, dated 11/22/2023, the admission record indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included fracture (a break in the bone) of the occiput (back of the head), atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that can cause poor blood flow, leading to blood clots, heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not provide adequate blood flow to meet the body's needs) or stroke), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH - age-associated prostate gland enlargement that can cause urination difficulty),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement abuse prohibition and prevention program policy and procedure by not reporting an allegation of physical abuse for one of three sampled resident (Resident 1) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), after Resident 2 slapped Resident 1 on the face on 12/10/2023. This deficient practice had the potential for the underreporting of abuse incidents, and delay in investigation a physical abuse allegation, placing Resident 1 at risk for further abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), cardiomyopathy (enlargement of heart), and chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prohibition and prevention program policy by failing to submit the results of the investigation of an allegation of physical abuse to the state agency (California Department of Public Health [CDPH]) within 5 working days of the incident for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice delayed the CDPH investigation of the allegation of physical abuse, potentially placing Resident 1 at risk for further abuse and violation of resident rights. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should), cardiomyopathy (enlargement of heart), and chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BARRY & ESTHER WEISS LIVING TRUST U/T/D OCTOBER 15, 1984Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF10%since 08/15/2008
GAVRIELLE FRIED EXEMPT TRUST UNDER THE GAVRIELLE FRIED FAMILY 2008 GRAOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF23%since 08/15/2008
MARVIN FRIED EXEMPT TRUST UNDER THE GAVRIELLE FRIED FAMILY 2008 GRAOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF23%since 08/15/2008
SHIMSON WEISS EXEMPT TRUST UNDER THE SHIMSON WEISS FAMILY 2008 GRANTOROrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF23%since 08/15/2008
AUSTRIA, HEIDIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/13/2016
HOVHANNISYAN, ARMENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2014
WEISS, JONAHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/16/2012
WEISS, REBECCAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2003
WEISS, ESTHERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/14/2004
WEISS, BARRYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/14/2004
CLEAR ADVANTAGE CONSULTING, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2018
COLLEGE HEALTH ENTERPRISES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2003
HANSEN HUNTER LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
LTC INVESTORS G, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2006

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$156K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 14%Other / private 9%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $156K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$435per resident / day
operating cost
$13,218per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$437per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056019. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next