No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Memorial Hospital Of Gardena D/P SNF

1145 W. Redondo Beach, Gardena, CA 90247 · Non profit - Corporation · 69 certified beds · (310) 532-4200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (310) 532-4200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 actual-harm citation$12,831 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $12,831 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-09)
  • nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1141 W Redondo Beach Blvd · (310) 527-5554 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1344 W Redondo Beach Blvd · (310) 353-5726 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Vons0.1 mi
1260 W Redondo Beach Blvd · (310) 767-7920 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Marine Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
15709 S Normandie Ave · (310) 997-4515

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased47.6%10.2%15.4%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.2%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.0%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers27.4%4.3%4.7%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.4%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.7%12.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication15.4%1.5%1.4%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.03U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.03 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

2.70
RN hours/ resident / day
3.09
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.26
Aide hours/ resident / day
9.05
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
2.34
RN hoursweekends
57.1%
Total nursing turnover
75.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 69 beds and averages 64.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 9.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.26 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 8.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 9.37 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.85 to 2.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-10)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents who were admitted to the facility with intact skin did not develop a pressure ulcer ([PU], injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin or bony prominences) for three of three sampled residents (Residents 163, 40, and 38). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 163's did not develop a Stage III PU (Full thickness tissue loss) to the right buttocks after the admission to the facility. 2. Ensure the nursing staff monitored Resident 163 skin condition to identify development of a PU to the right buttock at the earlier stage to prevent development of a Stage III PU. 3. Ensure the nursing staff implemented Resident 163's care plan titled Skin Integrity by ensuring the resident will not have a skin breakdown. 4. Ensure nursing staff turned and repositioned Resident 40 every two hours to prevent a deep tissue pressure injury ([DTPI] a serious form of pressure injuries defined as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to:Ensure food items in walk-in refrigerator 1 were labeled and unexpired. Ensure the walk-in freezer 2 had an internal thermometer (used to check the refrigerator's inside temperature).Ensure the walk-in refrigerator 3 had an internal temperature that was within range (acceptable is 41 degrees F or lower) .This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents developing a foodborne illness (food poisoning). Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview, on 4/7/2026 at 8:48 a.m., with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), an unopened cheese danish was observed unlabeled and undated, and a pack of opened hot dog buns had an expiration date of 4/4/2026 in the walk-in refrigerator 1. The DSS stated all food items should have been labeled and dated. The DSS stated all expired items should had been discarded. The DSS stated the risk of not discarding expired items and not labeling and dating food items could result in foodborne illnesses due to being possibly spoiled. During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool) was completed accurately for one of 17 sampled residents (Resident 22).This deficient practice resulted in incorrect data being transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and had the potential to negatively affect the plan of care and delivery of care and services for Resident 22.Findings:During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own) with placement of tracheostomy (an opening created at the front of the neck so a tube can be inserted into the windpipe [trachea] to help you breathe), quadriplegia (loss of movement and/or sensation, to some degree, of the legs), and sepsis (a life threatening blood infection).During a review of Resident 22's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 screening (a federally required preliminary screening for individuals seeking admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility) was conducted and resubmitted for one of two sampled residents (Resident 5), who had diagnoses of mental illness (abnormal behavior or disturbing feelings, thoughts, or actions that interfere with every day functioning) and was receiving psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior).This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 5 not appropriately evaluated and not provided the necessary specialized services for mental illness.Findings:During a review of Resident 5's untitled document (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the document indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 5's diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the low air loss mattresses (special mattress for skin management) settings for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 7), were correct basing on the resident's weight.This deficient practice resulted in inaccurate settings and placed the resident at risk for further skin breakdown.Findings:During a review of Resident 7's untitled document (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the document indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 7's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure (a sudden, life-threatening emergency where the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or fail to remove carbon dioxide), hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your blood) and hypercapnia (a medical condition where there is too much carbon dioxide in your blood).During a review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the normal saline ([NS] - sterile solution of sodium chloride) intravenous (IV - into or connected to vein), 500 cubic centimeter ([cc] metric unit of volume) solutions, used to keep-vein-open (a continuous, very slow-rate IV infusions to prevent blood clots, drug precipitates, or obstructions from forming within an IV catheter), were not used longer than 24 hours, for two of two sampled residents (Residents 3 and 37) as indicated in its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, IV Therapy Administration.This deficient practice had the potential to placed Resident Residents 3 and 37 at risk for infection and IV therapy complications.Findings:A. During a review of Resident 3's untitled document (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the document indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 3's diagnoses included respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 9) was free of unnecessary psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) by failing to monitor resident's behavior and implement non-pharmacological interventions (intervention that does not primarily use medicine) prior to initiation of psychotropic medication.This failure had the potential to place Resident 9 at risk for avoidable harm from unwanted adverse effects (a harmful and undesired effect resulting from a medication) related to psychotropic medication use.Findings:During a review of Resident 9's untitled document (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the document indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 9's diagnoses included respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own) with placement of tracheostomy (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove Resident 25's one vial of expired Lispro (type of fast acting insulin [a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication]) insulin from medication cart 5.This deficient practice placed Resident 25 at increase risk to receive expired insulin that could be ineffective in treating the resident's high blood sugar levels.Findings:During a review of Resident 25's untitled document (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident) the document indicated, Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 25's diagnoses included Diabetes Mellitus ([DM] - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), and end stage renal disease ([ESRD] - irreversible kidney failure).During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a contingency plan (a pre-defined set of actions to be taken if an original plan fails or an unexpected event occurs) for staffing was developed and included in the Facility Assessment (a process for evaluating a facility's resident population and identifying the resources needed to provide care and services).This deficient practice had the potential for the facility to ineffectively respond during unexpected circumstances and negatively impact resident care.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/8/2026 at 4:34 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the Facility Assessment, dated 2/2026, was reviewed. The DON stated the Facility Assessment should be revised when there are changes in the general staffing plan, a new leadership or in the operation of the facility and was responsible in updating the Facility Assessment. The DON stated the Facility Assessment contains the operation of what the facility staff do on a day to day, but not on an emergency. The DON stated the revised Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to:Ensure the Certified Nurse Assistant 1 (CNA 1) had a disposable gown on when performing direct- resident care to Resident 64, as indicated in its policy and procedures (P&P), titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control steps used in nursing homes to prevent the spread of germ-resistant bacteria) for Subacute Unit, which indicated to don (put on) gown and gloves prior to high contact care activity (hands-on tasks performed by healthcare staff involving direct contact with residents and/or immediate environment, often resulting in the transfer of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to staff clothing and hands). This deficient practice had the potential to result in cross contamination (process by which bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one object or person to another, with harmful effect) of organisms from residents to staff or staff to residents.Findings: During a review of Resident 64's untitled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 27 sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 32) received care in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) by failing to: 1. Implement turning interventions for Resident 5. 2. Provide wound care as ordered by the physician for Resident 32. These deficient practice had the potential for the resident to acquire new pressure ulcers and/or worsen current pressure ulcers. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record, indicated Resident 5's was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 5's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/18/2024, H&P indicated Resident 5's diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident ([CVA] a medical emergency that occurs when blood flow to the brain is suddenly cut off) and hypertension (high blood pressure.) During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure food items were labeled with received and used dates in the dry storage area and two refrigerators. 2. Ensure expired foods were not stored in the kitchen and accessible to be used in food preparation in accordance with food service safety. These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk for developing a foodborne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/15/2024 at 11:43 a.m. at entrance of the kitchen observed shelves with plastic containers containing single serve lemon juice bags, 1 container with single serve ranch dressing bags, 1 container with single serve Italian dressing bags, 1 container with single serve grape jelly, 1 container single serve pack syrups, 1 container with single serve ketchup bags and 1 contain with single serve mayonnaise bags. Outside the plastic containers were not label with receiving or used by dated. The Kitchen Supervisor (KS) stated, I do not know the expiration date of these products. The KS stated the expiration date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures for four out of 27 sampled residents by failing to: 1. Sanitizing their hands between changing gloves, washing hands after cleaning the wound, and applying a clean dressing for Resident 32. 2. Sanitize hands and change gloves after cleaning the colostomy stoma (an opening in the abdomen that allows stool to pass through instead of the anus) and before putting on the new colostomy bag for Resident 38 and after cleaning the wound and before applying the treatment and dressing for Resident 38 and Resident 46. 3. Keep the urinary catheter bag off the floor for Resident 64. These failures had the potential to spread infections and illnesses amongst residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on 2/15/2025 at 3:20 p.m. in Resident's 32 room, with Treatment Nurse (TN) 2. TN 2 when inside Resident's 32 room with wound care supplies. TN 2 wash hands and applied clean gloves and removed soiled dressing from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 4), was properly assessed for dry and crusty (rough or thickened texture) skin on his left palm. This deficient practice resulted in lack of or delay in care for Resident 4 and potential risk for skin breakdown. Findings: During an observation on 2/15/2024 at 8:25 a.m. in Resident's 4 room. Resident 4 was laying on the bed and unable to verbally communicate. Resident 4's left hand was closed with very dry skin white in color and rough. During a review of Resident 4's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included cerebral vascular accident (CVA-stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), tracheostomy (allows air to pass into the windpipe to help with breathing.), and coronary artery disease (a condition where the arteries that supply blood to the heart become narrowed or blocked.) During a review of Resident 4's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to: 1.Implement turning interventions in accordance with the facility's policies and procedures (P/P) for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 5.) This deficient practice resulted in delayed turning for Resident 3 which resulted in a blister on left trochanter (hip joint) and two blisters on left thigh. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record, indicated Resident 5's was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including cerebrovascular accident ([CVA] a medical emergency that occurs when blood flow to the brain is suddenly cut off) and hypertension (high blood pressure.) During a review of Resident 5's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/18/2024, H&P indicated Resident 5's diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident ([CVA] a medical emergency that occurs when blood flow to the brain is suddenly cut off) and hypertension (high blood pressure.) During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure that the facility staffed sufficient Certified Nurse Assistant (CNAs) to administer and provide nursing services in a timely manner for one out of 27 sampled residents (Resident 5) The deficient practice resulted in delayed care for Resident 5. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record, indicated Resident 5's was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 5's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/18/2024, H&P indicated Resident 5's diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident ([CVA] a medical emergency that occurs when blood flow to the brain is suddenly cut off) and hypertension (high blood pressure.) During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 10/12/24, the MDS indicated Resident 5's was able to understand and be understood by others. The MDS indicated Resident 5's required supervision with eating,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to: 1. Provide one of 27 sampled residents (Resident 38) a special call light system to use. This failure caused Resident 38 to feel frustrated and helpless. Findings During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, dated 1/3/2025, the admission Record indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition when there is not enough oxygen in the tissues in the body). During a review of Resident 38's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/24/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 38 had diagnoses of quadriplegia (a paralysis that affects all a person's limbs), multiple pressure sores present on admission (injury to skin caused by prolonged pressure to the skin), and tracheostomy (a procedure to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by creating a hole at the front of the neck). The H&P indicated Resident 38 was awake, alert, and interactive, but compromised in communication due to his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b. During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), renal failure (one or both kidneys no longer function well on their own), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). During a review of Resident 36's Minimum Data set ([MDS] a standardized care screening and assessment tool), dated 11/12/2023, the MDS indicated, Resident 36's cognition (ability to learn reason, remember, understand, and make decisions) skills Resident 36 was oriented to year, month, year, and could recall questions that were previously asked. The MDS indicated, Resident 36's oral and dental status did not have mouth discomfort or difficulty with chewing. During an observation and interview on 2/8/2023 at 9:40 a.m. with Resident 36, in resident room, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to; 1. Ensure the physician was promptly notified when one of one sampled resident (Resident 163), had a change of condition (a change in resident's normal, physical, mental, or behavioral state). Resident developed full-thickness skin loss potentially extending into the subcutaneous tissue layer (stage 3 pressure ulcer) on the right buttock. A physician notification was made on 2/8/2024 (1 day after the initial identification of the pressure ulcer). This deficient practice had the potential for a delay in care and intervention of Resident 163's Stage 3 pressure ulcer Findings: During a review of Resident 163's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 163 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body), tracheostomy (an opening created at the front of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1.Ensure the comprehensive Minimum Data Set ([MDS] resident assessment and care screening tool) assessment for one of fifteen sampled residents (Resident 51) was completed within the required timeframe. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 51 not receiving proper care and treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 51's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), hypoxia (not enough oxygen), and hypercapnia (when you have too much carbon dioxide in your blood). During a review of Resident 51's MDS assessment, dated 8/21/2023, the MDS assessment, indicated Resident 51's had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 which indicated Resident 51's cognitive skills for daily decision making was moderately impaired. During a concurrent interview and record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide accurate information in the Minimum Data Set ([MDS] resident assessment and care screening tool) assessment for two of fifteen sampled residents (Resident 10 and Resident 36). This deficient practice had the potential to result inaccurate care and services for the residents due to inappropriate MDS care screening and assessment tool practices. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 10's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), Diabetes (a serious condition where your blood glucose level is to high), and congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). During a review of Resident 10's MDS entry assessment, dated 8/24/2023, the MDS assessment under A1000 (Race/Ethnicity) indicated, Resident 10 was Black or African American.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Revise tube feeding (a way to give medications or liquid food through a small tube placed into the stomach) care plans for two out of five sampled Residents (Resident 40, and 18). These deficient practices had the potential for repeat occurrences for not revising residents care plans. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled body movements due to abnormal electrical activity in the brain), and diabetes mellitus (a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel). During a review of Resident 40's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/18/2023, the H&P indicated, Resident 40 unable to review systems due mental condition. During a review of Resident 40's Minimum Data set ([MDS] a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to: 1. Provide an ongoing activity program to meet the needs and interests for one of 5 sampled residents (Residents 40) to ensure residents maintained their highest physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This failure had the potential of not enhancing Resident 40's quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled body movements due to abnormal electrical activity in the brain), and diabetes mellitus (a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel). During a review of Resident 40's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/18/2023, the H&P indicated, Resident 40 unable to review systems due mental condition. During a review of Resident 40's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received dialysis (process of removing waste products and excess fluids from the body) received treatment in accordance with standard of practice for one of one sampled resident (Resident 164) by failing to implement the physician's order for fluid restriction accurately. This deficient practice placed Resident 164 at risk for fluid overload, swelling, shortness of breath and discomfort. Findings: During a review of Resident 164's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated, the facility originally admitted Resident 164 on 12/19/2023 and was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including respiratory failure (a condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), tracheostomy (an opening created at the front of the neck so a tube can be inserted into the windpipe [trachea] to help you breathe), gastrostomy (a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach to provide nutrition and medication), and end stage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the treatment nurse was competent in wound site identification. This failure had the potential for a resident receiving treatment at the wrong site. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/8/24 at 12:05 p.m. with LVN 2, Resident 38's Photographic Documentation, dated 2/1/24 was reviewed. The Photographic Documentation indicated Resident 38 had a wound in the left glutei fold. The actual picture indicated the wound was on the left buttock. LVN 2 agreed the wound was not in the left gluteal fold. LVN 2 stated he continued to write what the previous nurse wrote. LVN 2 could not verbalize what he would document the site as. LVN 2 stated he was trained in wound care by the facility over a two week orientation. LVN 2 stated he had no prior nursing experience before being hired as a treatment nurse. LVN 2 stated he became a nurse in February 2023 and was hired by the facility in June 2023. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/9/24 at 8:20 a.m. with LVN 2, LVN2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure expired medications were removed from the medication cart for 1 out of 5 sampled Residents (Resident 40). This failure resulted in Resident 40 receiving expired medications. Findings: During an observation on 2/7/24 at 4:19 p.m. at the 7th floor Team 2 medication cart, a packet of expired Atorvastatin (medication that lowers cholesterol) was noted. The packet had an expiration date of 1/31/24. Six pills were removed from the packet for 2/1/24 to 2/6/24. During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled body movements due to abnormal electrical activity in the brain), and diabetes mellitus (a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel). During a review of Resident 40's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure potassium levels were checked prior to administering a potassium supplements. This failure had the potential to result in the resident having a high potassium level, which can be life threatening. Findings: During an observation of medication pass on 2/8/24 at 11:06 a.m., LVN 1 failed to check the potassium level before giving Effer K (a medication that increases the potassium level). During an interview on 2/8/24 at 11:06 a.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated, you need to check the potassium level before giving the dose. If the level is greater than 5 and you give the dose the patient can be hyperkalemic (condition of having a high potassium level) and you need to call the doctor. A high potassium level can make the heart go fast. It can hurt your heart. During an interview on 2/8/24 at 12:39 p.m., with LVN 2, LVN 2 stated, before giving a dose of potassium you should check the potassium level to ensure it's not above five. If you give the dose without checking the potassium level and the level is above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure all medication carts were secured after a nurse left the keys on the side of the medication cart. This failure had the potential to result in an unauthorized person obtaining the keys and taking medication from the cart. Findings: During an observation on 2/7/24 at 2:55 p.m. at the Team 1 medication cart, a key with a blue wrist cord was noted on the side of the cart. During an interview on 2/7/24 at 2:55 p.m. with LVN 5, LVN 5 stated the key is for the medication cart. LVN 5 stated the key was left on the cart in an attempt to prevent losing them. LVN 5 stated if someone gets the key they can open the medication cart. That person can then take drugs from the cart and overdose. LVN 5 states she was trained to keep the keys in a secure place. LVN 5 states the location where the keys were observed is not a secure place. During an interview on 2/7/24 at 3:02 p.m. with LVN 6, LVN 6 stated the medication cart key should be kept on your body. If someone gets access to the key they can open the cart and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b. During a review of Resident 36 admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), renal failure (one or both kidneys no longer function well on their own), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). During a review of Resident 36 Minimum Data set ([MDS] a standardized care screening and assessment tool), dated 11/12/2023, the MDS indicated, Resident 36's cognition (ability to learn reason, remember, understand, and make decisions) skills Resident 36 was oriented to year, month, year, and could recall questions that were previously asked. The MDS indicated, Resident 36's oral and dental status did not address Resident 36 had mouth discomfort or difficulty with chewing due to missing and broken teeth. During an observation and interview on 2/8/2023 at 9:40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the inside compartment of the ice machine was to be maintained in a sanitary manner for nine out of 59 residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an outbreak of foodborne illness that could affect all or most of the residents who reside in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/6/2024 at 9:45 a.m. with Dietary Service Supervisor 1 (DSS 1) in the kitchen, found inside compartment of the ice machine was dirty. DSS 1 used a clean paper towel to swipe the inside compartment of the ice machine, produced black residue with hard water deposits. DSS 1 stated it was their engineering department who was responsible for the maintenance of the ice machine every month. DSS 1 stated the ice machine compartment was dirty and not safe for consumption. During a review of Ice Machine Cleaning Schedule 2024, the Ice Machine Cleaning Schedule indicated the ice machine was last cleaned on 1/12/2024. During an interview on 2/6/2024 at 11:50 a.m. with Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Accurately document fluids (the amount of liquid going into the body) that were infused intravenously ([IV]a method of putting fluids, including drugs, into the bloodstream) into the body for one out of five sampled Residents (Resident 40). This deficient practice had the potential to result in confusion in the care and services rendered to Residents and inaccurate information could be entered into the resident's clinical record. Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own), seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled body movements due to abnormal electrical activity in the brain), and diabetes mellitus (a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel). During a review of Resident 40's History and Physical (H&P), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance ([QAA] develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement ([QAPI] takes a systematic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes while involving residents and families, and all nursing home caregivers in practical and creative problem solving) committee failed to: 1. Identify facility dental services and care issues for one of one sampled residents (Resident 36). The failure to fulfill and fully implement an active QAPI process had the potential to result in resident harm by not having a system in place to identify significant resident safety issues, develop a plan to correct identified issues, and implement the plan or monitor the results of the facility plan. Findings: During a review of Resident 36 admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$12,831 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $12,831 — penalty dated 2024-02-09
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-12 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AVANTI HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/17/2011
AVANTI HOSPITAL HOLDINGS I LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/17/2011
AVANTI HOSPITALS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/17/2011
DEERFIELD PRIVATE DESIGN FUND IV, LPOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/28/2019
DFP OPCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/28/2019
HEALTHPLUS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/13/2006
HOLLISTER HEALTH HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/28/2019
JPM PROPERTY HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/28/2019
NLO PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/28/2019
PIPELINE HEALTH SYSTEM HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/28/2019
PIPELINE HEALTH SYSTEM, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/28/2019
PIPELINE HOSPITAL HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/28/2019
BELL, MARKIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/28/2019
EDWARDS, IRVIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2008
MACPHERSON, JAMESIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/31/2008
METCALFE, ROBERTIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/26/2020
GARDENA HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/29/1999

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555441. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next