Rosecrans Care Center
1140 West Rosecrans Avenue, Gardena, CA 90247 · For profit - Corporation · 106 certified beds · (310) 323-3194 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.2% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.37 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.59 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 98 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.1%CMS range 42.5–65.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 8.3–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 36.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 83.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 77.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 6.0–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.56 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 106.3 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly -0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.19 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), was free from injury, by failing to provide two or more staff supervision when providing care with activities of daily living (eating, dressing, getting into or out of a bed or chair, taking a bath or shower, and using the toilet) as indicated in Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 1/1/2024. The MDS indicated two or more persons will assist Resident 1 with mobility (rolling from left to right, sit to lying, lying to sitting position and with transfer from bed to chair, chair to bed and with tub/ shower transfer), toileting hygiene, shower, and personal hygiene. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a right upper arm fracture (broken bone) which required hospitalization at a general acute care hospital (GACH) for evaluation and treatment. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was originally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Supervise and monitor residents at risk for wandering and elopement (when a resident leaves the facility without the knowledge of the staff), for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). 2. Ensure the entrance and exit doors of the facility were monitored to prevent Resident 1 from leaving the facility unattended. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an injury for Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The face sheet indicated Resident 1 had diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease (a hardening of your arteries from plaque building up gradually incident the arteries), repeated falls, hyperosmolality and hypernatremia (a cause of decrease in body water, an electrolyte problem), type 2 diabetes Mellitus (abnormal blood sugar), pressure ulcer (a sore to the skin and tissue below the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plans were:1. Updated quarterly for three of seven sampled residents (Resident 4, 5, and 25)2. Revised for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 87)These failures had the potential to result in Residents 4, 5, 25, and 87 not receiving the specific and timely care related to their illnesses and diagnoses.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 4's diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and dementia (loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning). During a review of Resident 4's care plan titled, At risk for impaired skin integrity as evidence by easy skin bruising/skin discoloration, skin tears/abrasions including pressure skin injury due to Braden scale score: 18 – at risk, dated 10/22/2025, the care plan indicated the goals were last revised on 10/22/2025.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date food items in the pantry, refrigerator and freezer, and did not securely store prepared raw fish in flat tray.These deficient practices had the potential to cause food-borne illness for all residents.Findings:During an observation on 6/2/2026 at 9:00 a.m. in pantry number one in the kitchen, a box of 100 tea bags and a box containing Nestle rich chocolate individualized bags did not have a use by date.During an observation on 6/2/2026 at 9:30 a.m. in freezer number one in the kitchen, one package of frozen chocolate chip cookies did not have a use by date.During an interview on 6/2/2026 at 9:35 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated the two boxed items in the pantry and the frozen package of cookies in the freezer did not have a use by date. The DS stated labeling dried and frozen packages with a use by date was essential to ensure food was stored safely and to prevent contamination, spoilage, and foodborne illness.During an observation on 6/4/2026 at 11:11 a.m. in the kitchen, four flat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) was notified when Resident 2 had redness and exudate (a fluid that leaks out onto skin surface in response to inflammation, injury, or infection) at the insertion site of the perma-catheter (a long, flexible tube inserted into a large vein and threaded near the heart).This deficient practice had the potential to delay medical evaluation and treatment.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnosis included stage three pressure ulcer (full thickness loss of skin. Dead and black tissue may be visible), diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and end stage renal disease (the final, permanent stage when the kidneys can no longer filter wase and fluid s from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([PASRR] - a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) was accurate for one of five sampled residents (Resident 107).This deficient practice had the potential to result in an inaccurate identification of specialized mental health service needs.Findings:During a review of Resident 107's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia (a severe, chronic mental health condition where a patient experiences a loss of touch with reality), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 107's History and Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered language and communication care plan for one of five sampled residents (Resident 45).This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 45 having a communication barrier with staff.Findings:During a review of Resident 45's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior), and chronic kidney disease stage 5 (kidneys have lost almost all of their ability to filter waste, extra water, and toxins from the blood).During a review of Resident 45's History and Physical (H&P) dated 6/2/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 45 had the mental capacity to understand but lacked the capacity to make medical decisions.During a review of Resident 45's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) had the correct low air loss mattress (LALM, a specialized mattress support surface used to prevent and treat pressure ulcer (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) setting.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 to develop pressure ulcers. Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnoses included stage three pressure ulcer (full thickness loss of skin. Dead and black tissue may be visible), diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and end stage renal disease (the final, permanent stage when the kidneys can no longer filter waste and fluids from the blood to sustain life).During a review of Resident 2's History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven residents (Resident 70) had an identification (ID) band on their wrist or ankle.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 70 not being properly identified for medical care and procedures.Findings:During a review of Resident 70's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (any disease, damage, or malfunction that affects the brain's structure or function), dementia (loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning), and muscle weakness.During a review of Resident 70's History & Physical (H&P), dated 6/24/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 70 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions.During a review of Resident 70's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 3/31/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 70's cognition (ability to think and process) was severely impaired. The MDS indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide transportation to a dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) clinic for one of five residents (Resident 17).This deficient practice had the potential to result in dangerous buildup of toxins in the body and fluid overload (the body retains too much sodium and water).Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD, the final most severe stage of chronic kidney disease), anxiety disorder (excessive fear or worry in everyday situations), and dependence on renal dialysis.During a review of Resident 17's History & Physical (H&P) dated 5/4/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 17 had fluctuating capacity to understand and make decisions and was able to make decisions for daily activities. During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Social Services Director (SSD) planned for transportation to dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) for one of five residents (Resident 17).This deficient practice resulted in Resident 17 missing one dialysis treatment.Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD, the final most severe stage of chronic kidney disease), anxiety disorder (excessive fear or worry in everyday situations), and dependence on renal dialysis.During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool), dated 5/10/2026, the MDS indicated Resident 17 was able to express ideas and wants and was able to understand others. The MDS indicated Resident 17's cognition (ability to think and process) was . The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed pharmacist conducted a monthly Medication Regimen Review (MMR) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 10).This failure had the potential to result in Resident 10 receiving unnecessary medication and could lead to adverse side effects.Findings:During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 50 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 10's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and psychotic disorder (mental health condition where a person strongly believes things that are not true, even when there is clear evidence showing otherwise) with delusions (false beliefs).During a review of Resident 10's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/21/2026, the H&P indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the cultural and ethnic needs of food choices were identified for one of five sampled residents (Resident 107).This deficient practice placed Resident 107 at risk for being dissatisfied with meals.Findings:During a review of Resident 107's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 107 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia (a severe, chronic mental health condition where a patient experiences a loss of touch with reality), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).During a review of Resident 107's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/19/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 107 did not have the capacity to make medical decisions.During a review of Resident 107's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 4/17/2026, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist attended the February 2026 and May 2026 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI, a data driven proactive approach to improvement used to ensure services are meeting quality standards) meetings.This failure resulted in the facility not meeting the minimum required members for the monthly committee meeting.Findings:During a record review of the Monthly QAPI Meeting attendance sheets dated 2/20/2026 and 5/22/2026, the QAPI Meeting attendance sheets indicated there was no signature for the infection preventionist (IP).During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/5/2026 at 11:06 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM) and the Director of Nursing (DON), in the DON's office, the QAPI meeting attendance sheets for the 2/20/2026 and 5/22/2026 meetings were reviewed. The attendance sheets indicated there was no signature for the IP. The ADM stated the IP did not attend the meetings on 2/20/2026 and 5/22/2026. The ADM stated the minimum staff in attendance for QAPI meetings were the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the perma-catheter (a long, flexible tube inserted into a large vein and threaded near the heart) was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2).This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 2 to develop an infection.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnoses included stage three pressure ulcer (full thickness loss of skin. Dead and black tissue may be visible), diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and end stage renal disease (the final, permanent stage when the kidneys can no longer filter wase and fluid s from the blood to sustain life).During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/19/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 2 did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a residents' responsible party (RP) of a change in condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3).This deficient practice had the potential to violate Resident 3's RP's rights to be informed of changes to the plan of care.Findings:During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 3's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), pressure ulcer of the sacral region (directly over tailbone), Stage Four (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing).During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/14/2026, the H&P indicated Resident 3 was non-verbal and did not have the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document behavioral interventions as indicated on the care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) following an altercation with Resident 2.This failure had the potential to result in continued behavioral escalation and increased risk of physical harm to other residents.Findings:During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/10/2025 with diagnoses including anemia (low blood cells in body) and schizoaffective disorder (mental health disorder affecting how a person thinks and acts).During a record review of Resident 1's progress note dated 2/28/2026, the progress note indicated Resident 1 was transferred out for 5150 (a law code that allows a person in a mental health crisis to be taken to a hospital or mental health facility against their will) for danger to others.During a record review of Resident 2's admission Record, (Face sheet), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/14/2026 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to:1. Ensure one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) unwitnessed injury to the left eye was reported to California Department of Public Health (CDPH).This deficient practice of not reporting to CDPH within 24 hours of an unwitnessed injury resulted in discoloration (a localized area of altered skin color that indicates underlying tissue damage) to the left eye. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses metabolic encephalopathy (an acute or chronic alteration in brain function), epilepsy (a chronic neurological disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and muscle weakness (a reduction in the ability to generate normal force in muscles, often presenting as impaired physical mobility, fatigue, or decreased functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Refrigerators and Freezers which indicated to monitor and record the refrigerator and freezer temperatures daily, for 3 of 3 refrigerators and 2 of 2 freezers.This failure had the potential to cause food spoilage (the deterioration of food due to various factors, resulting in an undesirable change in its appearance, taste, texture, or nutritional value) and lead to foodborne illnesses (any illness caused by consuming foods or beverages contaminated with harmful bacteria, viruses and parasites or their toxins [poisonous substances produced by organisms like bacteria that harm the body]).Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 01/05/2026 at 11 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the kitchen, the refrigerator and freezer temperature logs dated 2026, were reviewed.The refrigerator temperature logs for the following days were blank and did not indicate monitoring was completed:On 1/1/2026 and 1/2/2026 for Produce and Breads, Milk and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its infection prevention and control measures for one of two shower rooms (east shower room), by failing to ensure the shower floor and wall were clean and disinfected from fecal matter (the solid waste passed out of the body of a human through the bowel). This failure had the potential to spread bacteria and germs that could lead to infection for facility residents. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 01/05/2026 at 11:39 a.m., with the housekeeper (HK 1), in the east shower room, dry brown fecal matter was observed on the wall of the 2nd shower stall, and a small drop of brown feces was observed on the floor. HK 1 stated failure to clean and disinfect the walls and floors may increase the risk of residents getting sick.During a review of the facility's Job Description titled, Housekeeper, dated 09/2025, the Job Description indicated the primary purpose of this position is to perform the day-to-day activities of housekeeping as directed by the housekeeping supervisor to assure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy during care for three of eight residents (Residents 2, 3, and 4) when certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) 1, CNA 2, and CNA 3 did not fully close the privacy curtains while providing care. This failure had the potential to affect the dignity and self-worth of Residents 2, 3, and 4. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 8/15/2025 with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, lymphedema (tissue swelling caused by an accumulation of protein-rich fluid that's usually drained through the body's lymphatic system), and morbid obesity (severely overweight). During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/1/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 2 had the capacity to make decisions. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 8/19/2025, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-21 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), at least 30 days prior to the resident's discharge plan on 7/19/2025, as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Transfer and Discharge Notice.This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 not being aware of the discharge plans and had the potential to affect the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility (deviations from the typical manner of walking) and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat.) During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 6/26/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the mental capacity to understand and make medical decisions. During a review of Residents 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Residents 2), was not trapped in Resident 1's room on 7/15/2025 at 4:00 a.m. This failure had the potential to cause resident to resident altercation and resident injuries, leading to hospitalization.1). During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility (deviations from the typical manner of walking,) and Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heartbeat.)During a review of Resident 1's H&P dated 6/26/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the mental capacity to understand and make medical decisions.During a review of Resident 1's MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition. The MDS indicated Resident 1 required supervision or touching assistance with ADLs such as dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, transfer and mobility.During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding and bruising related to the use of aspirin (a medication used to prevent blood clots) and Eliquis (a medication used to prevent blood clots) between 4/1/25 and 4/24/25 in one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident 82). The deficient practice of failing to monitor for signs and symptoms of bleeding during aspirin and Eliquis therapy increased the risk that Resident 82 could have experienced adverse effects (unwanted and dangerous side effects of medication) such as bleeding and bruising leading to medical complications requiring hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 82's admission Record (a record containing diagnostic and demographic resident information), dated 4/24/25, indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side (paralysis and muscle weakness in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Label one opened vial of latanoprost (a medication used to treat eye conditions) eye drops with an open date affecting Resident 16 in one of two inspected medication carts (East Medication Cart). 2. Store lorazepam oral solution (a medication used to treat mental illness) in the refrigerator per the manufacturer's requirements affecting resident 410 in one of two inspected medication carts (East Medication Cart). 3. Store gabapentin oral solution (a medication used to treat nerve pain) in the refrigerator per the manufacturer's requirements affecting resident 410 in one of two inspected medication carts (East Medication Cart). 4. Label one open fluticasone/salmeterol inhaler (a medication used to treat breathing problems) with an open date affecting Resident 411 in one of two inspected medication carts (East Medication Cart). 5. Label one open Lantus insulin pen (a medication used to treat high blood sugar) with an open date affecting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sample residents (Resident 30) had an intravenous (IV- a thin flexible tube inserted into the vein used to draw blood and give treatments) catheter with the date of insertion on it. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 30's IV site to go unchanged which could lead to an infection. Findings: During an observation on 11/22/2025 at 11:00 a.m. Resident 30 was observed lying in bed with an IV catheter inserted to the left wrist with no date on the outer dressing of the IV. Resident 30 was receiving IV fluids through the IV catheter inserted to the left wrist. During a review of Resident 30's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 30 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (a condition where the kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 82) had their oxygen saturation level (O2 sat- a measurement of how much oxygen the blood is carrying as a percentage) checked every shift as ordered. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 82 to be receiving too much or too little oxygen and could lead to difficulty in breathing. Findings: During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 11:13 a.m., Resident 82 was observed in bed and had a nasal cannula (a device that delivers extra oxygen through a tube into your nose) on with oxygen at 2 liters per minute (lpm- flow of oxygen per minute). During a review of Resident 82's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 82 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on supplemental oxygen (a medical treatment that provides extra oxygen to a person), cardiomegaly, and myocardial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to manage a resident ' s pain (Resident 1) after the resident complained of pain to the licensed nurse. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing unrelieved pain and had the potential to interfere with activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 10/10/2024, with diagnoses including polyneuropathy (disease or dysfunction of one or more nerves, typically causing numbness or weakness in the hands and feet), repeated falls, and diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 1/13/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had the ability to express ideas and wants and the ability to understand others. The MDS also indicated Resident 1 had no impairment in the upper extremities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound dressings for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1) were labeled with the nurse's initials, time, and date. This failure had the potential to result in wound dressings not being changed, resulting in wound infections and delayed wound healing. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated Resident 1's diagnoses included stage 4 pressure ulcer (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone) of the sacral (lower back) region, quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms due to severe physical disability or frailty), and diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS – a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Enhanced Standard Precautions ([ESP] a framework for reducing multi drug-resistant organism [MDRO] transmission by using gowns and gloves while caring for residents at high risk for MDRO transmission, at the point of care during specific activities, by contmainating health care workers' hands, clothes and the environment), which indicated to don (put on) PPE within room, before engaging in activity (resident care), if splash is anticipated, for two of eight sampled residents (Residents 6 and 7), who had physician ' s orders for wound care. This deficient practice had the potential to result in transmission of a disease-causing organisms, affecting the other residents in the facility, and the potential for the affected residents ' delay in wound healing process. Findings: 1). During a review of Resident 6 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 6 was originally admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure clean linens were not placed near the facility's washing machines where dirty and soiled clothing was stored. This deficient practice placed clean linens at risk for bacteria (small single-celled organisms that cause infection) and had the potential for cross contamination and spread of infection throughout the facility. Findings: During an observation on 4/18/2024 at 12:15 p.m. in the facility's laundry room, there were 11 linen carts filled with clean linen and placed alongside of three washing machines with dirty linen washing inside. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/18/2024 at 12:20 p.m. in the laundry room with the Housekeeping Supervisor (HS), the HS the 11 linen carts placed by soiled linen were clean and will be distributed to the residents throughout the facility. The HS stated having the clean linen close to the washing machines with soiled linen will put residents at risk infection and could spread throughout the facility. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/18/2024 at 12:45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff promoted dignity while assisting one of two residents (Resident 56) during meals by standing over the resident and not maintaining face to face eye contact. This deficient practice had the potential to result in feelings of decreased self-esteem and self-worth for Resident 56. Findings: During a review of Resident 56's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 56's diagnoses included epilepsy (a chronic disorder of the brain characterized by recurrent brief episodes of involuntary movement that may involve a part of the body or the entire body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease that causes blocked airflow from the lungs), schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder with symptoms of hallucinations or delusions and mood disorder like depression) and major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that causes a persistently low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure resident and/or responsible party (RP) was informed in advance, of the risks and benefits of psychoactive medication (a drug that changes brain function and results in altercations in perception, mood, consciousness, or behavior) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 56). This deficient practice violated the residents' right to make an informed decision regarding the use of psychoactive medications. Findings: During a review of Resident 56's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 56's diagnoses included epilepsy (a chronic disorder of the brain characterized by recurrent brief episodes of involuntary movement that may involve a part of the body or the entire body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] a lung disease that causes blocked airflow from the lungs), schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder with symptoms of hallucinations or delusions and mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 6) was provided a safe, clean and homelike environment by failing to provide a room that did not have soiled or peeling paint on the bedroom walls. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 6 to be exposed to dirt, harsh chemicals, infection and accidents. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 6's diagnoses included Type 2 diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar), heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs), and anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities). During a review of Resident 6's history and physical (H&P), dated 10/3/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 6 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set ([MDS] assessment and care screening tool) assessment regarding the pneumococcal vaccine (a biological preparation that prevents the most common and severe forms of pneumonia [lung infection]) was conducted for one of five sampled residents (Resident 75). This deficient practice had the potential to result inaccurate care and services for Resident 75 due to inappropriate MDS care screening and tool assessment practices. Findings: A review of Resident 75's admission Record, indicated Resident 75 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 75's diagnoses included end stage renal disease ([ESRD] a condition in which the kidneys no longer function normally), diabetes mellitus type 2 ([DM] a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and heart failure (the heart is unable to pump blood around the body properly). A review of Resident 75's History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and re-submit the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review ([PASRR] a tool to determine if the person had, or was suspected of having a mental illness, intellectual disability [a term used when a person has certain limitations in cognitive functioning and skills, including communication, social and self-care skills], or related condition) level one (I) screening and refer one of eight sampled residents (Resident 22) who had a new diagnosis of psychosis (collection of symptoms that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality) to the appropriate state-designated authority for a PASRR level two (II) evaluation and determination. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 22 not receiving appropriate treatment recommendations for psychosis. Findings: A review of Resident 22's admission record, indicated, Resident 22 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to initiate a care plan for Restorative Nursing Assistant ([RNA] assist the patient in performing tasks that restore or maintain physical function as directed by the established care plan) services for one out of four (4) residents' (Resident 74). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services. During a review of Resident 74's admission record (face sheet), the admission record indicated Resident 74 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included ataxia (poor muscle control that causes clumsy movements), muscle weakness (decreased strength in the muscles), repeated falls (more than two falls in a six-month period), and cardiomegaly (an enlarged heart). During a review of Resident 74's Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment and care screening tool), dated 1/17/2024, indicated the resident was assessed to be cognitively intact and required supervision with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of four Residents (Resident 43) had a revised care plan to implement an order for a back brace (a device designed to limit the motion of the spine) for support. This deficient practice placed Resident 43 at risk, for providing back support, and had the potential to cause immobility, unsteady gait, and increased back pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 43's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 43 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included low back pain (pain between the lower edge of the ribs and the buttock), muscle spasm (a muscle cramp is an uncontrollable and painful of a muscle), and myalgia(soreness and aches in the muscles that can range from mild to severe). During a review of Resident 43's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/22/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 43 could understand and make their own medical decisions. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oral hygiene (cleaning the mouth and tongue) for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 92). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 92 having poor oral hygiene with the presence of thick yellowish particles on the mouth and tongue that could lead to an oral infection. Findings: A review of Resident 92's admission record, indicated Resident 92 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 92's diagnoses included cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to loss of oxygen to the area) with hemiplegia (weakness) and hemiparesis (inability to move on one side of the body), hypertension ([HTN] high blood pressure), and diabetes mellitus ([DM] a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). A review of Resident 92's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/17/2024, indicated Resident 92 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one of three residents (Resident 3) her preferred activity to stay in the dining recreation area to participate in group activity. This deficient practice had the potential to decrease Resident 3's social interaction, sense of belongings, depression, and emotional health. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 3's diagnoses included cerebral infarction (damage to tissues in the brain due to loss of oxygen to the area) with hemiplegia (weakness) and hemiparesis (inability to move on one side of the body), diabetes mellitus ([DM] a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and epilepsy (a brain condition that causes recurring seizures). During a review of Resident 3's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/11/2024, the H&P indicated, Resident 3 did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of nine sampled residents (Resident 22), with a limited range of motion, was provided with a left hand roll (a device that prevents fingers from curling up tightly) as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to result in further decline in range of motion and worsening of contracture (decrease in passive range of motion at a joint) for Resident 22. Findings: A review of Resident 22's admission record indicated Resident 22 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease in which the tissues in the joint break down over time), contractures, and dementia (loss of cognitive functioning, thinking, remembering, and reasoning). A review of Resident 22's care plan titled, Resident at risk for pain due to use or application of hand roll to affected extremity, dated 6/15/2021, indicated Resident 22's goal was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received hemodialysis ([HD] process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body) received treatment in accordance with standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident 75) by failing to: 1. Ensure the HD emergency kit (E-Kit) was always available at bedside for safety measures for HD complications. 2. Communicate to Resident 75's physician regarding the recommendation of dialysis treatment center staff to limit fluid restriction to 32 ounces ([oz] measures volume) per day. These deficient practices had the potential to result in staff inability to manage bleeding from Resident 75's dialysis access site in the event of emergency and risk for fluid overload, swelling, shortness of breath and discomfort. Findings: A review of Resident 75's admission Record, indicated Resident 75 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 75's diagnoses included end…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two medications were labeled with medication open dates for two of two sampled residents (Resident 13 and 77) and to follow manufacturer's guidelines when foil was opened for budesonide inhalation suspension (medication to help with breathing) for Resident 77. This failure had the potential to result in the loss of medication potency and for residents to receive ineffective medication dosages. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with the diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ([COPD] disease that effects the lungs) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. During a review of Resident 13's Order Summary report dated [DATE], the order summary report indicated Resident 13 was on Spiriva hand inhaler (medication used to help with breathing), one inhalation orally one time a day. During a review of Resident 77's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of four Residents (Resident 43) had a back brace ordered by the physician to alleviant (relieve) back pain. This deficient practice did not provide Resident 43 with a back brace to help alleviate back pain and had the potential to place Resident 43 of having increased back pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 43's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 43 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included low back pain (pain between the lower edge of the ribs and the buttock), muscle spasm (a muscle cramp is an uncontrollable and painful of a muscle), and myalgia(soreness and achiness in the muscles that can range from mild to severe). During a review of Resident 43's History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/22/2023, the H&P indicated, the Resident 43 can understand and make their own medical decisions. During a review of Resident 43's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of five sampled residents (Resident 75) was offered the pneumococcal vaccine ([PNA] a vaccine that prevents the most common and severe forms of pneumonia [ infection of the lung]). This deficient practice placed Resident 75 at higher risk of acquiring pneumonia. Findings: A review of Resident 75's admission Record, indicated Resident 75 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 75's diagnoses included end stage renal disease ([ESRD] a condition in which the kidneys no longer function normally), diabetes mellitus type 2 ([DM] a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), and heart failure (the heart is unable to pump blood around the body properly). A review of Resident 75's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/6/2023, indicated Resident 75 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 75's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] an assessment and care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Administrative Manual titled, Elder/ Dependent Abuse, which indicated to report any allegations of abuse or that results in serious bodily injury, to the State Survey agency, immediately but not later than two hours, for one of three residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 sustained a baseball size (a regulation baseball is 9 to 9.25 inches in circumference) bruise (discolored skin) on her right upper forearm. Resident 1 sustained right upper arm bone fracture (broken bone). This deficient practice delayed the investigation by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included quadriplegia, contracture of right hand, and aphasia (inability to communicate). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/23/2023, the H&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-30 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — patternProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of four sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4) who had long rough edges toenails, received foot care and treatment. This deficient practiced placed Residents 2, 3 and 4 at risk for infection of the toenails, pain, and injury. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including parkinsonism (brain conditions which causes slowed movements, stiffness, and tremors), diabetes ([DM] high blood sugar), and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized care assessment and care screening tool), dated 11/19/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 2 required substantial/ maximal assistance (staff lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provided more than half of the effort) to total dependence on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) such as dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its infection prevention and control policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure staff properly donned (put on) a facemask (protective covering to help prevent spreading of germs and diseases) while in the facility and in resident care areas. This failure had the potential for the spread of transmissible diseases amongst staff, residents, and visitors. Findings: During observations on 1/30/2024 at around 10:09 a.m., the following were observed: 1.Certified Nurse Assistance (CNA) 1 exited room [ROOM NUMBER] and walked down the hallway with her surgical mask down to her chin. 2.CNA 2 was exited room [ROOM NUMBER] and walked to the nurse station without a mask. 3.Activity Director (AD) was standing next to a resident in the activity room wearing a surgical mask on her chin. 4.Restorative Nurse Assistance (RNA) assisted a resident in her wheelchair wearing a mask down to her chin During an interview on 1/30/2024 at 1:10 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P/P) titled Enteral (passing through the intestine, either naturally via the mouth and throat, or through an artificial opening) Feedings-Safety Precautions which indicated to elevate the head of a resident's bed (HOB) at least 30° during tube feeding (gastrostomy [GT] when a tube is inserted through the stomach to administer food and medication) for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in aspiration (when a person swallowed something and it entered the lungs instead of the stomach), difficulty breathing and death. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission record dated 9/20/2023, the admission record indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), dependence on supplemental oxygen,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P/P) titled Lab and Diagnostic Test Results-Clinical Protocol, which indicated the physician will order diagnostic and laboratory tests based on each resident's condition and nurses will identify the urgency of communicating with the physician based on the request, the seriousness of an abnormal result or the resident's current condition, for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 1 to bruise and bleed. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including anemia (not enough healthy red blood cells in the body), hypertension (high blood pressure), and Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that causes a gradual decline in memory, language loss, and impaired judgment). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Maintain accountability of 14 doses of controlled substances (narcotics, medications with a high potential for abuse) located the in the emergency kit (e-kit), affecting all 99 residents within the facility. 2. Ensure emergency narcotics were available in the event narcotic medications are ordered by a physician for severe pain, possible seizure (burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells) or acute coronary syndrome (range of conditions related to sudden, reduced blood flow to the heart) for all 99 of the residents. 3. Notify local authorities and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) regarding 14 missing doses of controlled substances, affecting all 99 residents within the facility. 4. Securely store nine medication cards (a bubble pack from the dispensing pharmacy labeled with the resident's information that contains the individual doses of the medication) containing unused controlled substances as required by the facility's policy and procedure for eight out of 12 sampled residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure residents in Rooms 6, 7, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29 had at least 80 square feet ([sqft]- a unit of measure) of living space. This deficient practice had the potential to result in residents not being able to move around freely or store personal items. This also had the potential for staff having difficulty providing care due to a lack of space. Findings: During an observation on 4/22/2025 at 10:51 a.m., Toom 26 was noted to contain four beds. During a review of the Client Accommodation Analysis, dated 4/22/2025, the analysis indicated the facility had the following room measurements: Room # # of beds Floor square footage 6 1 90 7 4 270 14 2 150 15 2 150 16 2 150 18 2 150 19 2 150 20 2 150 21 2 150 22 2 150 23 2 150 24 2 150 25 2 150 26 4 285 27 2 150 28 2 150 29 2 150 During a review of the Room Variance Waiver request letter, dated 4/23/2025, the letter indicated Rooms 6, 7, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29 fall short of the minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 17 out of 41 (Rooms 7, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 27, 28, and 29) residents' bedrooms measures at least 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in a multi-resident rooms and 100 sq. ft in a single resident room. room [ROOM NUMBER] measured less than 100 sq. ft. per single resident room. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for insufficient space and could have the potential to lead to inadequate nursing care for the residents. Findings: During a facility tour on 4/18/2024 at 9:06 AM, rooms 6 ,7, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26 27, 28, and 29 were observed and measured with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) less than 80 sq. feet for multi-resident rooms and less than 100 sq. feet for a single resident room. During an interview on 4/19/2024 at 11:19 AM with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated resident care has not been affected due to the room sizes being out of compliance. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAUTISTA, CIPRIANO | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 45% | since 03/01/2017 |
| BRION, ALGER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 03/01/2017 |
| HENDELES, ELIYAHU | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 03/01/2017 |
| ROSEN, JOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 5% | since 03/01/2017 |
| BAMBOAT, VIVIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/19/2015 |
| BAUTISTA, CHRISTIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2023 |
| BRINLEY, BRITTANY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| FIGUERROA, ZENNIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/16/2025 |
| GELVEZON, CRIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/17/2018 |
| LEANO, LADY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/11/1995 |
| MUNOZ, HILARIO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/21/2025 |
| SATOW, KYLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SOLANO, STEPHANY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/26/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $771K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055072. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.