Ararat Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.70 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 28 beds and averages 24.1 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.46 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.91 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.66 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.70 to 0.85 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-12-19 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide immediate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR, an emergency lifesaving procedure, consisting of a combination of chest compressions, mouth-to-mouth, or mechanical breathing [a device used to help someone breathe], performed when the heart stops beating or beats ineffectively and/or to restore breathing), and call 911 (emergency services and/or emergency transfer to the general acute care hospital) for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 34), who had a full code status (when resident's heart stopped beating and/or the resident stopped breathing, the resident or his/her representative wished for all lifesaving procedures to be provided to keep the resident alive) by failing to: 1. Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 started CPR on [DATE] at around 11 AM when LVN 1 found Resident 34 unresponsive, in accordance with the facility's policies titled, Physician Orders For Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a written medical order that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to store, prepare, distribute and serve food for all the 24 residents in the facility receiving food from the kitchen in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, and the facility's policy and procedure titled, Food Storage, dated 11/1/2014. This deficient practice had the potential for the residents to acquire food-borne illnesses (a life threatening infection due to consuming contaminated food) from ingesting expired food. Findings: During an initial tour of the facility's kitchen on 1/20/2026 at 8:35 AM with the Dietary Manager (DM) there were undated and expired food items stored in the refrigerator: Undated uncooked celery stored in a box. Expired cabbage stored in a refrigerator with a label to use by 1/16/2026. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/20/2026 at 8: 35 with the Dietary Manager (DM) stated that all kitchen stored food is labeled and someone must have forgotten to label the celery. DM stated that the cabbage was not going to be used and that someone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure by failing to: 1.Ensure a humidifier bottle (a small bottle attached to the oxygen tubing that holds water to keep oxygen from drying out a person's nose and lungs) was changed for one of six sampled residents (Resident 26) reviewed for infection control that required oxygen therapy in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Oxygen administration. 2. Ensure the staff were using a gown while assisting the resident that was on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP- an infection control measures that involve wearing gowns and gloves for all high-contact activities with residents in nursing homes to stop the spread of multidrug-resistant organism [MDRO- is a type of bacteria that has developed resistance to multiple antibiotics, making infections difficult to treat and requiring enhanced infection prevention measures to reduce…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy and a homelike environment for two of two sampled residents (Resident 29 and Resident 39) by failing to report the missing to the maintenance supervisor to replace the missing horizontal window blind slats in Resident 29 and Resident 39's room. This deficient practice resulted in having a non-homelike environment and a violation of the residents' rights for privacy when the residents were exposed to the other people outside in the walkway and neighboring building near the facility. In addition, the loss of privacy had the potential to affect their psychosocial wellbeing of the residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 29's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 29 on 4/30/2024 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure (the heart is unable to pump blood around the body properly), diabetes mellitus (a disease that affects how the body uses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 39 and Resident 41) and their representatives, reviewed for resident's rights were offered an information regarding Advance Directives (AD a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) in accordance with facility policy titled Advance Directives and regulatory requirements. This deficient practice has the potential for care and services to not be performed during medical emergencies according to the residents and/or family wishes. 1. During a record review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR) dated 1/17/2026 indicated Resident 41 was admitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses of pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), history of malignant neoplasm of the prostate (cancerous tumor that can spread (metastasize) to other parts of the body).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure to provide the Medicare change status form: Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN, notice of liability) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) letters/forms to one of three sampled residents (Residents 45) within two (2) days of the last Medicare part A covered day. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 45 not to exercise the right to appeal and not be aware of possible charges for services rendered that were not covered after her last Medicare part A coverage day. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/23/2026 at 11:41 AM with the social service coordinator (SSC), the facility document notices provided to Resident 45: SNF-ABN date of notice 6/19/2025 and NOMNC dated 6/18/2025 was reviewed. The documents SNF-ABN and NOMNC was signed by Resident 45 on 6/18/2025. SSC stated, he was responsible in providing the notices to resident or responsible party. SSC stated, it is facility's policy to provide the notices to Resident 45…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 32) reviewed for pressure ulcer ( a skin breakdown due to prolonged unrelieved pressure and skin friction) receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers had recommended inflation/adjustment setting for the low air loss mattress (LAL - therapeutic mattress that uses blower and airflow to relieve pressure and keep the skin dry and prevent moisture build up). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident to be at risk of developing pressure ulcers. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record (AR) the AR indicated Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (total paralysis (no movement) of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), left knee and hand contracture (a stiffening/shortening at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 41's) with intravenous (IV- a catheter inserted with a needle into the vein) peripheral catheter (a thin tube inserted into a vein for therapeutic purposes such as administration of medications, fluids and/or blood products) on the left arm had dried up blood on the site covered with transparent dressing and was not changed in accordance to the facility's policy and procedure titled Peripheral Venous Catheter Insertion. This deficient practice can potentially cause infection on the on the IV site that can lead to severe infection. Findings: During a record review of Resident 41's admission Record (AR) dated 1/17/2026 indicated Resident 41 was admitted on [DATE], with the diagnoses of pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), History of malignant neoplasm of the prostate (cancerous tumor that can spread (metastasize) to other parts of the body).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0712 — isolated
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident evaluations including a written report of a physical examination was completed within 72 hours following admission and the initial comprehensive visit was not done by the Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant, and the Clinical Nurse Specialist for one of six sampled residents (Resident 17). This deficient practice had the potential to result in an undetected decline in medical, health or psychosocial condition and can lead to a delay in necessary care, treatment, and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record (AR) indicated Resident 17 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses of acute embolism and thrombosis of left femoral vein (sudden blood clots that block blood flow), pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs). During a review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 12/28/2025, the MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to remove a lidocaine patch (a medicated sticky patch placed on the skin to numb an area and relieve pain) at 9 PM and place a new patch at 9 AM to ensure the patch was on for 12 hours and off for 12 hours as ordered by the physician order for one of two sampled residents (Resident 10) reviewed for pharmacy services. This failure resulted in Resident 10 receiving lidocaine in excess duration as prescribed which had the potential to cause adverse effects (undesired effect) of medication that include increased systemic absorption (process by which medication moves from its site of administration into the bloodstream, allowing it to travel throughout the entire body), skin irritation, or medication toxicity (the medicine becomes harmful because there is too much of it in the body), that could lead to a decline in Resident 10's condition, harm or hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted Resident 10 on 12/4/2025 with diagnoses that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 4), reviewed for use of unnecessary medications, was monitored for complications of Apixaban (a blood thinner medication) such as bruising and bleeding as indicated in the resident's care plan and the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential for the resident not to receive immediate care or no care that can lead to a resident decline in well-being. for complication of Apixaban such as discolored urine, black tarry stools, sudden severe headache, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, muscle joint pain, lethargy, bruising, sudden changes in mental status, shortness of breath, nose bleeds. Findings: During a review of the admission Record (AR) indicated Resident 4 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (heart dysrhythmia), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of the Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$41,680 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $41,680 — penalty dated 2023-12-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 54 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA