Glenhaven Healthcare
212 West Chevy Chase Drive, Glendale, CA 91204 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 52 certified beds · (818) 240-6720 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0604), cited Aug 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $18,070 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-28)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.2% | 7.3% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.7% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 13.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 5.09 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.51 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.1%CMS range 28.8–53.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.4–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.3%CMS range 5.7–14.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.33 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 43.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.95 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-28 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a diagnosis of dementia (the loss of cognitive process) with combative behavior (aggressiveness/eagerness to fight) was free from physical restraints (any manual method, physical or mechanical device/equipment or material that limits a resident's freedom of movement and cannot be removed by the resident) for purposes of discipline or convenience, by failing to: 1. Protect Resident 1 from physical injury on 8/20/2024, when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 restrained Resident 1's right and left arms by crossing Resident 1's arms across the chest and above the head and pull/drag the resident from the resident's room to the Nursing Station when Resident 1 exhibited episodes of mood swings [a sudden or intense change in a person's emotional state]. 2. Implement Resident 1's care plan interventions on Dementia, and Communication Problem related to Language Barrier [a difficulty for people communicating because they speak different languages] by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to implement proper food sanitation and infection control practices as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure titled Hand Hygiene and Personal Hygiene for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 6,10 and 29) and 41 residents served meals from the kitchen by failing to ensure: 1.Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA1) involved in food handling and resident care performed proper hand washing techniques prior to and after dispensing meal trays to the residents (Residents 6,10 and 29). 2. The [NAME] (Cook 1) covered his beard while preparing food in the kitchen food preparation area for 41 residents that were served meals from the kitchen. These deficient practices had the potential for the residents to develop a result in food born illness (an illness when a microorganism, such as bacteria, fungi, or a virus, enters a person's body and causes harm) and result in a widespread infection in the facility. Findings: 1a. During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to document accurately in the resident's medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices and facilities policy and procedure for three (3) of three sampled ( Resident 1, 33 and 45) residents by failing to: 1.For Resident 1's medical record did not document Zoloft ( a medication used to treat depression- a feeling of severe sadness and hopelessness) in the CAR consent (Client Authorization Request - a form completed by the licensed staff and the physician before administration of psychotropic medications). The consent form did not indicate the name of the medication the resident or responsible party was informed about the risk and benefits and side effect of medication. 2. For Resident 33, Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) 1 failed to accurately document in the weekly assessments on Restorative Nursing Weekly Summary as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure titled Standards for RNA Program. The RNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed provide a safe, sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for four of four sampled Residents ( Resident 2,8,27, and 39) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Scope of Infection Control Program, by failing to ensure: 1.Resident 2's and 8's humidification bottle (bottled of water that adds moisture to the oxygen flow to reduce dryness and irritation during oxygen therapy) was observed without date, and residents name. 2.Resident 27's nasal cannula (NC-a flexible tube with two prongs that rest in the nostrils to deliver supplemental oxygen) was observed without a label or date the last time it was changed (NC are changed every seven days). 3.Resident 39's NC was observed on the floor. These deficient practices had the potential for these equipment's to harbor pathogens (bacteria and viruses that cause disease) that could result in infections to Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure for 1 out of 8 residents (Resident 2) who was observed wearing a soiled gown. This deficient practice had violated Resident 2's rights and the potential to result in the resident's feeling decreased self - worth, dignity that could lead to psychosocial declined. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission record (AR) indicated Resident 2 was admitted to facility on 7/8/2025, with a diagnosis of diabetes ( high blood sugar) , dementia( decline in memory, thinking and behavior) and heart failure( heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body's needs). During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical ( H&P) dated 8/23/2025, indicated Resident does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set ( MDS - Comprehensive screening tool) dated 10/29/2025, indicated the resident has moderately impaired cognition ( needing frequent redirection or reminder with inconsistent short-term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the resident's need to ensure that the call lights (a device used by residents to signal his or her needs for assistance) was within reach for one of four sampled Resident (Resident 39) who required assistance from staff with activities of daily living and care. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 39 not able to call when needed assistance with activities of daily living or could not call in an event of an emergency that could lead to a fall and or injury. Findings: During review of Resident 39's admission Record indicated Resident 39 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic heart failure (the heart has trouble pumping blood through the body), anemia (not having enough healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen to the body's tissues), osteoarthritis (a joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time), and bilateral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and obtain an Advanced Directive (a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) or properly fill out an acknowledgement of advanced directive form for two (2) of 13 sampled residents (Resident 9 and 53) in accordance with facility policy titled Advance Directives and regulatory requirements. This deficient practice has the potential for Residents 9 and 53 not to receive care and services according to the residents wishes especially during medical emergencies. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] , and was readmitted on [DATE] , with a diagnosis of end stage renal disease( kidneys no longer work well enough to keep the person alive on their own) and dependance for Hemodialysis ( HD- a machine that cleans their blood because their kidneys no longer work). During a review of Resident 9's History and Physical (H&P)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary assistance with good grooming and personal hygiene during routine nursing care to one (1) of four sampled residents (Resident 27) with unshaved facial hair. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact Resident 27's self-image, quality of life, self-esteem (overall sense of personal worth), that can lead to feelings of helplessness and diminished self-worth. Findings: During review of Resident 27's admission Record indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic heart failure (the heart has trouble pumping blood through the body), acute respiratory failure (lungs cannot effectively exchange gases, oxygen and carbon dioxide from the blood), and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 12/22/2025, Resident 27 sometimes able to make self-understood (ability making concrete request) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for one of one sampled resident (Resident 52) who received the incorrect tube feeding (a liquid form of food when unable to eat or drink by mouth) formula. Resident 52 received Jevity 1.5 calorie (a type of tube feeding/nutritional formula) instead of Jevity 1.2 calorie that was ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 52 to receive added calories that could lead to unplanned weight gain and/or not achieve the goal to received adequate nutrients to maintain the ideal weight. Findings: During a review of Resident 52's admission Record indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastrostomy (GT-a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems). During a review of the History and Physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide continuous supplemental oxygen therapy as ordered by the physician for one of two sampled residents (Resident 39) who was ordered to receive oxygen at 2-4 liters per minute (a unit volume flow rate) continuously via nasal cannula (NC-a flexible tube with two prongs that rest in the nostrils to deliver supplemental oxygen). Resident 39's NC was on the floor and not connected to the resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 39's lack of oxygenation and lead to respiratory decompensation (when respiratory system fails to meet the body's oxygen needs, requiring immediate intervention like oxygen) shortness of breath (SOB) and respiratory distress, that could negatively affect the resident. Findings: During review of Resident 39's admission Record indicated Resident 39 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic heart failure (the heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent and immediately report and/or no later than two hours the alleged allegation of abuse (an action that intetionally cause harm to another person) that involves verbal and physical abuse altercation of two of two sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) on 6/5/2025 before 10 AM when Resident 2 kicked Resident 3 ' s wheelchair and both residents had a verbal altercation. Resident 2 with history of abusive behavior hit License Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 on the cheek on 6/2/2025 around 9 PM (prior medication pass) and was not supervised and monitored for his abusive behavior to prevent recurrent abuse as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 hitting Resident 1 on the cheek while in the activity room on 6/5/2025 around 2:30 PM (four and a half hours after the first alleged abuse incident) during an altercation. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bedside curtains for one (1) of two sampled residents (Resident 2) was fully closed, when Resident 2 tested positive for influenza (a severe lung infection) and required to be on droplet precaution (a set of infection control measures used to prevent the spread of respiratory infections from a patient to others) in accordance to public health guidelines on influenza outbreak taking place in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to result in wide spread influenza infectiion spreading to other residents and staffs in the facility. Findings: During an observation on 1/28/25 at 2:15pm in Room A, the curtain for Resident 2 was partially open, two other beds were occupied with other residents, a certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 3) was observed wearing simple face mask in the room. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and interventions to prevent pressure injury (PI-damage to an area of the skin caused by constant pressure on the area for a long time) for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to turn, reposition and to off-offload (release pressure) from an area of the body every two hours while in bed, keep clean and dry after a bowel movement or wetness from urine due to incontinence (unwanted passage of urine or stool that you can ' t control). These deficient practices resulted in: 1. Resident 1 developed a facility-acquired Stage 2 (partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow open sore or wound) PI on sacrococcyx (tailbone) area on 10/15/24, and proceeded to Stage 3 (Full-thickness loss of skin. Dead and black tissue may be visible) with drainage on 10/22/24. 2. A sacrococcyx PI reopened on 12/18/24 after MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage) developed on 12/8/24, and on 12/26/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose garbage and refuse (food waste, scraps) properly by not covering one of one metal dumpsters (large trash container designed to be emptied into a truck) due to overflowing trash bags filled with garbage, and leaving additional trash bags, boxes, and an old mattress on the ground by the garbage area. This deficient practice had a potential to attract birds, flies, insects, pest, rodents, and possibly spread infection to residents and staffs in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/18/2024 at 10:55 AM with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) in the facility's garbage area, one metal dumpster was observed with the lid open due to overflowing trash bags filled with garbage, and additional trash bags, boxes, and an old mattress on the ground by the garbage area next to the bin. The MS stated, the housekeeping supervisor was responsible of making sure the trash bin was empty, and the garbage area was clean. The MS stated, we were also responsible in making sure this area was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 9, and 45) by failing to ensure residents call light (a device used by residents to signal his or her needs for assistance) was within reach. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 1, 9, and 45 not able to call the facility staff to ask for help or assistance. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 9 on 1/23/2024 with diagnoses that included dementia (a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) and blindness of left eye. During a review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning tool), dated 8/9/2024, indicated Resident 9 had severely impaired memory and cognition (ability to think and reason). The MDS indicated Resident 9 was dependent with oral hygiene, shower/bathe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview and record review the facility did not follow policy and procedure for Food Storage Principle, on food storage, and in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to: 1. Discard 15 ham sandwiches in a steel pan in the refrigerator with an expired used by date of 11/14/2024. 2. Label and date an open plastic bag with two hotdog buns in the refrigerator. 3. Discard six breaded fish in an open plastic bag in the freezer with an expired used by date of 11/10/2024. 4. Label and date a pitcher of prune juice in the refrigerator. These deficient practices had the potential to result in food contamination, growth of microorganisms (disease causing organism) that could cause foodborne illness (food poisoning or food illness due to pathogens (harmful organism that cause illness such as bacteria, viruses, or parasites) and toxins that contaminate food and negatively affect the health of the residents who consumed it. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/18/2024 at 8:30 AM with the Dietary Service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility 's policy and procedure on infection control to prevent the spread of infection for 3 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 101, Resident 5, and Resident 39) by failing ensure Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 6 practice proper hand hygiene and wear gloves or gowns in Resident 5's contact precaution (a set of measures to prevent the spread of infectious agents through direct or indirect contact with individuals or an environment) room. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of infection (a process when a microorganism, such as bacteria, fungi, or a virus, enters a person's body and causes harm). Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 5 on 3/5/2021 and readmitted her on 10/4/2024 with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), muscle weakness, and metabolic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure certified nurse assistant (CNA) 3 was seated when assisting one of eight sampled Residents (Resident 2) during mealtime. This deficient practice had the potential to result in feelings of decreased self-esteem and self-worth for Residents 2. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 2 on 5/18/2016 and readmitted her on 9/10/2024 with diagnoses that included dementia (a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities) and hemiplegia (a condition that causes partial or complete paralysis on one side of the body). During a review of Resident 2's Initial History and Physical, dated 9/13/2024, indicated Resident 2 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 9/14/2024, indicated Resident 2 was dependent with eating, oral hygiene, shower/bathe self, toilet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) and Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a medical order form that tell medical staff what to do if you have a medical emergency and are unable to speak for yourself) was accessible in residents medical records (physical paper chart) for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 41). Resident 41's paper chart did not have a copy of the Advance Directive Acknowledgement and the original POLST. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 41's medical treatment, provisions, to be delayed and/or not be carried out, according to the Resident 41's and/or Responsible Party's request during an emergency, which can negatively affect Resident 41's quality of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 41 ' s admission Record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for two of two sampled residents (Residents 4 and 23) when: 1. Resident 4, who was a high risk for fall, was observed in bed reaching for his drinks by the bedside table, without a floor mat as per plan of care to prevent injury from fall. 2. Resident 23, who was a high risk for fall, and had a fall incident on 11/18/2024 in Room B (RB-not Resident 23's room) witnessed by a Resident in Room B (RRB), was not frequently monitored, or supervised as per plan of care. These deficient practices had the potential for to cause major injury from a fall and negatively affect Residents 4's and 23's quality of life. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 4 ' s admission record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included psychosis (symptoms that cause a person to lose touch with reality, or have a break in their thoughts and perceptions),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to attempt to use appropriate alternative interventions before the installation of bilateral ¼ siderails (quarter bars that are attached to the side of the bed to help with safety and comfort) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 31). This failure had the potential for Resident 31 to be at risk for entrapment (when a resident can get caught by the head, neck, chest, or other body parts in tight spaces around the siderail) and physical injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 31 ' s admission Record, the facility admitted Resident 31 on 6/22/2023 and readmitted Resident 31 on 12/28/2023 with diagnoses that included hypertensive heart (heart problems that occur because of high blood pressure over time) and chronic kidney disease (kidney damage over time) with heart failure (heart cannot pump enough blood to meet the body ' s needs) and muscle weakness (the muscle does not have enough strength to move normally). During a review of Resident 31 ' s History and Physical (H&P, a comprehensive physician ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical records in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Documentation Guidelines, for two of four sampled residents (Resident 14 and Resident 50) by failing to: 1. Ensure the Infection Preventionist document wound care treatment as provided to Resident 14 on 9/5/24. The IP stated she was covering for the treatment nurse and forgot to document it in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). 2. Document Resident 50 ' s discharge disposition (the location to which the resident was transferred to) in the resident ' s discharge record. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively impact the delivery of services to Resident 14 and had resulted in Resident 50 ' s discharge record to be inaccurate. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 14 ' s admission record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 14 on 12/22/2021 and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment care and services, in accordance with professional standards of practice, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by: 1. Failing to honor Resident 1 ' s request to transfer to the acute hospital on 9/6/26 due to a change in condition for more than 4 hours. 2. Failing to assess, recognize, intervene, after Resident 1 had a change of condition on 9/6/24. 3. Failing to document Resident 1 ' s condition in the facility forms titled SBAR (Situation, Background, Action, Respond). These deficient practices had the potential to delay in the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 1 and negatively affect Resident 1 ' s psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (admission record), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/30/2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that LVN (Licensed Vocational Nurse)1 who was from a Nursing Registry [a business or agency that provides nursing staff to hospitals], demonstrated the necessary competency to provide adequate care for one of three sampled residents, (Resident 1). This deficiency had the potential to negatively impact Resident 1's psychosocial well-being and delay the delivery of critical care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (admission record), the Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/30/2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own which develops when the lungs can't get enough oxygen into the blood), and generalized anxiety disorder( a mental disorder that causes people to experience excessive, uncontrollable, and irrational worry that interfered with their daily living). During a review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation practices in the kitchen when one of two dietary staff, Dietary Staff (DS) did not perform hand hygiene (a way of cleaning the hands, which can prevent the spread of germs) and/or change gloves in between preparing sandwiches for 40 residents, and also touching the coffee machine, and the menu, sheet during tray line (a system of food preparation, used in hospitals, in which trays move along an assembly line) observation for lunch. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a harmful bacteria cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (caused by consuming contaminated foods or beverages) that could negatively affect residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During a food preparation observation in the kitchen on 11/28/2023 at 11:50 PM, the DS touched the surface of the coffee machine and then touched the lunch menu sheet without performing hand hygiene…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy and dignity to 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 25) when Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 6) did not cover the Resident 25's naked body and did not close door while transporting Resident 25 from bedside commode to bed. This deficient practice had the potential for others to see Resident 25's naked body which may cause psychosocial harm to the resident. Findings: During an observation on 11/27/2023, observed CNA 6, use a mechanical lift to transport Resident 25 from the bedside commode to Resident 25's bed. Resident 25's naked body was exposed resulting in the potential for visitors to see Resident 25's naked body. The bathroom and bed are in Resident 25's room. The door was open to the hallway where persons were walking during the transfer. During an interview on 11/30/23 at 9:10 AM, with CNA 6, CNA 6 stated, I do not close the door to the room because I am inside the room. During an interview on 11/30/23 at 9:23 AM, with Charge Nurse (16-another identifier?) stated, When a resident is moved…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain an informed consent from the responsible party for one of two sampled residents (Resident 28) who was prescribed Lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety [a mental disorder that result in having the fear of the unknown]); Zyprexa (a medication used to treat psychotic conditions such as schizophrenia [a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behave] and bipolar disorder [mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration], Depakene (medication used to treat seizure disorders [burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells that causes temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements] that stabilizes mood, and Clozapine (a medication to treat medication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia). This failure violated Resident 28's rights to be informed about the side effects (undesired effect of medication) and when choosing the type of care or treatment to be received, make decisions on alternative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess, reflective of the resident's status at the time of the assessment for one of four residents (Resident 41). The Social Service Designee (SSD) did not assess Resident 41's communication needs due to the resident being asleep during the assessment and documented Resident 41 was not interview able. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 41 did not receive the communication tools needed to communicate needs which had the potential for the resident not to receive the care and services needed to maintain the highest well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 41's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), urinary tract infection (An infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder, or urethra) and chronic heart failure (A chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR - a federally required screening for mental health; PASARR Level I identifies suspected mental illness, intellectual/developmental disability, or related condition; Level II screening determines if the individual would benefit from specialized mental health services) Level II evaluation for two of two sampled residents (Resident 22 and 3). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 22 and Resident 3 not to receive necessary mental health services which can negatively affect their quality of life. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 22s facesheet indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should ) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person- centered care plan addressing resident specific interventions for one of four sampled residents (Resident 16). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of care and services related to the residents' health conditions and needs. Findings: A review of Resident 16's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis that affects one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and epilepsy (A disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures). A review of Resident 16's comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 10/7/2023, indicated the resident had severely impaired cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) skills for daily decision-making. The MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for one of four sampled residents (Resident 29) to indicate diet modifications. These deficient practices had the potential to result in Resident 29 not receiving the proper diet. Findings: A review of Resident 29's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), encephalopathy (A broad term for any brain disease that alters brain function or structure), and diabetes (A group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood). A review of Resident 29's comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 9/1/2023, indicated the resident had severely impaired cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) skills for daily decision-making. The MDS indicated the resident was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain good personal hygiene and activities of daily living (ADL) by ensuring the call light (an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a patient when in need) was within reach for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 38 and Resident 18) who needed assistance with ADLs as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure, titled Answering the Call Light and the resident's care plan. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 38 and 18 not to receive needed assistance to achieve their highest potential and wellbeing. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 38s admission record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized muscle weakness, generalized anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), abnormalities of gait and mobility (weakness of the hip and lower extremity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide an assistive device, such as a call light (an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a resident when in need) within reach for two of two sampled residents (Resident 38 and Resident 18) who were at high risk for fall. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 38 and 18 not to be assisted when needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) or in an event of emergency and result in accidents and injury. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 38s admission record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included generalized muscle weakness, generalized anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), abnormalities of gait and mobility (weakness of the hip and lower extremity muscles), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-an inflammatory lung disease that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services to one of four residents sampled (Resident 41). The Social Service Designee (SSD) failed to accurately assess and arrange Resident 41's communication needs through the resident's primary method of communication or in a language that the resident understood. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident 41 had the potential not to receive the care and services especially during an emergency needed to maintain or achieve the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 41's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), urinary tract infection (An infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder, or urethra) and chronic heart failure (A chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). A review of Resident 41's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet (sq. ft., a unit of measurement) per resident in the room with multiple residents in the bedrooms for 12 of 16 rooms. Resident Rooms 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 15 measured less than 80 sq. ft per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to have insufficient space for staffs and residents that can impact the ability to provide safe nursing care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s Client Accommodation Analysis (CAA, a form used to identify the room sizes and number of beds in a room) form, dated 1/6/2026, the CAA form indicated 12 resident bedrooms did not measure 80 sq. ft per resident as listed below: room [ROOM NUMBER] - 155.6 sq ft with two (2) beds and two (2) occupied beds room [ROOM NUMBER] - 292 sq ft with four (4) beds and four (4) occupied beds room [ROOM NUMBER] - 155.6 sq ft with two (2) beds and two (2)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident ' s bedrooms measured at least 80 square feet (sq ft, a unit of measurement) per resident in multiple bedrooms for 12 of 16 rooms. Resident Rooms 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, and 15 measured less than 80 sq. ft per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to impact the ability to provide safe nursing care and privacy to the residents. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s Client Accommodation Analysis (CAA, a form used to identify the room sizes and number of beds in a room) form, dated 11/21/2024, the CAA form indicated 12 resident ' s bedrooms did not measure 80 sq. ft per resident as listed below: Rooms Required Square Footage Square Footage Number of Beds Number of Residents 2 160 155.68 2 2 3 320 292 4 4 4 160 155.68 2 2 5 320 292 4 4 7 320 292 4 4 8 320 286.1 4 4 9 320 292 4 4 10 320 289.5 4 4 11 320 292 4 4 12 320 289.5 4 4 14 320 286.1 4 4 15 320 292 4 4 During an interview on 11/21/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 12 of 16 residents' bedrooms (Rooms 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14 and 15) met the required 80 square feet (sq. ft. a unit of measurement) per resident area as indicated in the federal regulation or the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). The rooms were occupied by residents and consisted of six resident beds in each room, a total of 38 residents occupied the 12 rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the health and safety of the residents in the room due to inadequate space for resident care, mobility, and privacy of the resident. Findings: During an observation from 11/30/23 09:31 AM , the residents residing in the Rooms 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14 and 15 were observed with sufficient space for the residents to move freely inside the rooms during the care delivery and daily activities. During an observation on 11/30/23 at 10:09 PM, of Rooms 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14 and 15, each room was occupied by the residents and had resident beds, side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$18,070 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $18,070 — penalty dated 2024-08-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KARP, BENJAMIN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 50% | since 06/30/2023 |
| KARP, MATTHEW | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 02/20/2026 |
| GUEVARRA, MARYDES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/26/2025 |
| KARAKASHIAN, GARO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| CARAVAN OPERATIONS CORP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/20/2012 |
| BAK, ABRAHAM | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/13/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $305K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555605. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.