Granada Hills Convalescent
16123 Chatsworth Ave, Granada Hills, CA 91344 · For profit - Corporation · 48 certified beds · (818) 891-1745 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (14% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,018 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-02)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.8% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.1% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.6% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 12.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.11 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.83 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.93 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.2%CMS range 49.4–65.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.5–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 65.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 71.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.1%CMS range 3.4–10.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 38.0 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.28 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.23 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 14% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment to prevent an accident for one of three sampled residents (Resident 27) by transferring Resident 27 without two staff when using a lift machine. On 6/12/2023, at 6:20 p.m. Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) transferred by herself Resident 27 using a Hoyer lift (a brand name for a mobile floor lift system [assistant device] that rolls on wheels [metal frame] and is intended to help lift, suspend with a sling, and transfer residents with mobility problems to transfer from and to bed. During two-person operation, one person engages the unit's controls while the other person handles and guides the individual being transferred). As a result, Resident 27 fell and sustained a head injury and a scalp laceration (cut) requiring a transfer to the General Acute Care Hospital 1 (GACH 1), where Resident 27 received six staples to the scalp laceration. Findings: A review of Resident 27's admission Record indicated the facility admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity including the right to be free from physical restraints (any manual method, physical or mechanical device, material or equipment that is attached or adjacent to the resident's body that he or she cannot easily remove that restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body) for two of two sampled residents (Residents 6 and 19) reviewed for physical restraints care area by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 6's use of restraint bed placed against the wall had a physician's order, informed consent (voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered), and restraint assessment. 2. Resident 19's use of restraint bed placed against the wall had a physician's order, informed consent, restraint assessment, and a person-centered care plan. The deficient practices had the potential to result in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a personalized document that outlines a person's health needs, the goals for their care, and the specific steps to achieve them) for three of four sampled residents (Residents 43,19, and 3) reviewed for care plans by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 43 had a care plan for medication self-administration. 2. Resident 19 had care plan on the use of restraint (is any action, device, or medication that limits a resident's ability to move freely or control their own body, and which they cannot easily remove themselves) bed placed against the wall. 3. Resident 3 had a care plan for diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) with a person-centered measurable goal. The deficient practices had the potential for residents not to receive necessary care and treatments. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 43's admission Record (AR),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility's licensed nursing staff failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of five residents (Resident 7) investigated for unnecessary medications by failing to follow the hold parameters for losartan (a medication used to treat high blood pressure), and midodrine (a medication is used to treat low blood pressure) as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications such as dizziness, syncope (fainting) and possible hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (or Facesheet, the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/15/2019, and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included end stage renal failure (ESRD, irreversible kidney failure) and hypertensive heart disease (a condition caused by chronic high blood pressure that leads to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free of accident hazards for four of four sampled residents (Residents 43, 23, 39, and 6) reviewed for accidents by failing to ensure: 1. Residents 23, 39, and 6's fall mats (a cushioned mat that reduces the risk of injury from a fall) did not have a furniture or equipment on top of them. 2. Resident 43 did not have any medications left at the bedside. These deficient practices increase the risk of accidents such as injuries associated to resident slips, trips, and falls by hitting the hard surface of the equipment or furniture that is on top of the fall mat and accidental ingestion of harmful chemicals. 3. The residents` environment was maintained free of accident hazards when a bottle of Advil (also known as ibuprofen, a medication commonly used to reduce fever and pain) containing medication was left unattended in the activity room and accessible to multiple residents. This deficient practice had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for one of five residents (Resident 7) investigated for unnecessary medications by failing to follow the hold parameters for losartan (a medication used to treat high blood pressure), and midodrine (a medication is used to treat low blood pressure) as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications such as dizziness, syncope (fainting) and possible hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (or Facesheet, the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/15/2019, and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included end stage renal failure (ESRD, irreversible kidney failure) and hypertensive heart disease (a condition caused by chronic high blood pressure that leads to heart failure [a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-18 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff were routinely trained and evaluated for competency skills when [NAME] (CK) 1 was unable to prepare pureed baked fresh zucchini and pureed garlic bread in a consistency that passed all the established testing guidelines including spoon-tilt test (a test used to determine the stickiness of the food and the ability of the food to hold together) for residents on puree diet (foods that are smooth with pudding like consistency)/International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI-a framework for categorizing food textures and drink thickness) level four (4). This deficient practice resulted in an improper puree consistency which was too watery and did not pass the spoon-tilt test, which had the potential to place the residents at risk for aspiration (when something other than air gets into your airways). Cross-reference F805 Findings: During a review of the facility's menu spreadsheet (a sheet containing kind and amount of food each diet would receive), dated 11/17/2025, Monday, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare foods in a form designed to meet individual needs when puree baked fresh zucchini and puree garlic bread was too watery and did not pass the spoon tilt test (a test used to determine the stickiness of the food and the ability of the food to hold together) for residents on puree diet (foods that are smooth with pudding like consistency)/International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI-a framework for categorizing food textures and drink thickness) level four (4). This deficient practice had the potential to result in decreased food and nutrient intake to seven (7) of seven (7) residents on puree diet, resulting in aspiration (when something other than air gets into your airways) and choking. Findings: During a review of the facility's menu spreadsheet (a sheet containing kind and amount of food each diet would receive), dated 11/17/2025, Monday, the spreadsheet indicated residents on puree diet would include the following foods in the tray: - Pureed wheat spaghetti 1/2 of a cup - Pureed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep the call light (an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a patient when in need) within reach of one of one sampled resident (Resident 39) reviewed under accommodation. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 39 unable to summon a health care worker for help as needed. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/11/2025 with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection) of left ankle and foot, lack of coordination, and acquired absence of left toes. During a review of Resident 39's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/12/2025, the H&P indicated the resident did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 39's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 11/17/2025, the MDS indicated the resident usually had the ability to make self understood and understand others and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a functioning wall clock for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 10). This deficient practice has the potential to placed Resident 10 at risk for disorientation and compromised the facility's obligation to provide a homelike and supportive environment. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/5/2025, with diagnosis including heart failure (when the heart muscle is too stiff or too weak to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), depression (loss of interest or low mood), hyperlipidemia (high levels of fats in blood), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 08/12/2025, the MDS indicated the resident with adequate hearing and vision, with the ability to usually make self-understood and the ability to usually understand others.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of nine sampled residents (Residents 6) who participated in the Resident Council meeting, was aware of the facility's grievance policy and procedures. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for unresolved dissatisfaction and undermines the facility's obligation to maintain a transparent and responsive care environment. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/30/2019, with diagnosis including diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hypothyroidism (when thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone, which slows down the body's metabolism), psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality), peripheral neuropathy (disease or dysfunction of one or more nerves, typically causing numbness or weakness in the hands and feet) hyperlipidemia (high levels of fats in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of bladder received services and assistance to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI, an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 39) reviewed for UTI by failing to ensure Residents 39's urinal bottle (portable container for collecting urine) was labeled with the name or room number of the residents. The deficient practices had the potential for cross-contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object or place to another), development of UTI, and potential switching of urinal bottle with other residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/11/2025, with diagnoses including osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection) of left ankle and foot, type two diabetes mellitus (DM2- a disorder characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids (liquids, such as medication or nutrition, that are administered to the body by bypassing the digestive system) were administered consistent with professional standards of practice to one of one sampled resident (Resident 39) reviewed for hydration by failing to: 1. Label the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, a long, thin tube inserted into a vein in the arm that travels up to a large vein near the heart) line with the date of last dressing change. 2. Change the loose and soiled PICC line dressing. 3. Obtain an order for PICC line dressing changes. The deficient practices had the potential for complications associated with intravenous therapy and catheter-related infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 39's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/11/2025, with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis (an infection of the bone) of left ankle and foot, type two (2) diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) was provided treatment in accordance with standards of practice by failing to ensure that the dialysis center recorded a resident's pre and post dialysis weights (the weight before and after fluid is removed during the dialysis treatment) on 11/17/2025 for one of one sampled resident (Resident 7) receiving dialysis treatment. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 7 to have unidentified complications after dialysis treatment such as abnormal vital signs (pulse rate, temperature, respiration rate, and blood pressure). Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (or Facesheet, the front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/15/2019, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices when Resident 10 was observed removing clean linens from a covered clean unattended linen cart located in facility hallway. This deficient practice had the potential to contribute to contamination (making something dirty) of clean linens increasing the risk of infection transmission to residents. Findings: During a review Resident 10's admission Record, the admission record indicate the facility admitted Resident 10 on 8/25/2023, with diagnoses including but not limited to depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), allergic rhinitis (allergy symptoms in your nose like sneezing, runny nose), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 8/12/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 10's cognition (process of thinking) was impaired. The MDS indicated Resident 10 required minimal assistance from staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY d. During a review of Resident 15's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 4/2/2024, with diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder (decreased mental function due to a medical disease other than a psychiatric illness) and age-related osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to lack of calcium and Vitamin D). During a review of Resident 15's History and Physical (H&P), dated 4/3/2024, the H&P indicated the resident had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 15's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 7/7/2024, the MDS indicated the resident had the ability to makes self-understood and understand others and the resident mostly required substantial to maximal assistance on mobility and activities of daily living (ADLs, are essential and routine tasks that most young, healthy individuals can perform without assistance). During an observation on 10/1/2024, at 9:18 a.m., observed Resident 15 lying in bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards for four of four sampled residents (Residents 11, 144, 33, and 28) investigated during review of insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose [a type of sugar] in the blood) care area by failing to ensure licensed nurses rotate (a method to ensure repeated injections are not administered in the same area) subcutaneous (beneath the skin) insulin administration sites. The deficient practice had the potential for adverse effect (unwanted, unintended result) of same site subcutaneous administration of insulin such as lipodystrophy (abnormal distribution of fat) and cutaneous amyloidosis (is a condition in which clumps of abnormal proteins called amyloids build up in the skin). Cross Reference F760 Findings: a. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/12/2024, with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2, a chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free of accident hazards for two of six sampled residents (Residents 15, 44, 31, 6, and 12) investigated under accidents by failing to ensure 1. Resident 15, 44, 31, and 36's fall mat (a floor mat designed to reduce the risk of injury from fall by providing a soft-landing surface) did not have medical equipment or furniture on top of the mat. This deficient practice lessened the effectiveness of the fall mat to prevent falls with injury by placing a heavy equipment and furniture on top of the fall mat, decreasing its effectiveness to lessen the impact of a fall due to permanent dented mat surface and placed the residents at risk for injury if they were to hit the equipment or furniture during a fall. 2. Failing to ensure the portable air conditioning (AC) appliance exhaust panel or sleeve inside Resident 12's window was secured properly and did not fall on top the resident's bed. This deficient practice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors (means the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order, manufacturer's specifications, and accepted professional standards) for four of four sampled residents (Residents 11, 144, 33, and 28) investigated during review of insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose [a type of sugar] in the blood) care area by failing to ensure licensed nurses rotate (a method to ensure repeated injections are not administered in the same area) subcutaneous (beneath the skin) insulin administration sites. The deficient practices had the potential for adverse effect (unwanted, unintended result) of same site subcutaneous administration of insulin such as lipodystrophy (abnormal distribution of fat) and cutaneous amyloidosis (is a condition in which clumps of abnormal proteins called amyloids build up in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections by failing to ensure: 1. Resident 15's nasal cannula oxygen tubing (a thin, flexible tube that delivers oxygen to a patient through two prongs that fit into the nostrils) was labeled with the date it was last changed for one of two sampled residents investigated under respiratory care. 2. Resident 32's nasal cannula oxygen tubing was off the floor and the nebulizer tubing (a tube that connects the compressor of a nebulizer to the medication cup) was labeled with the date it was last changed for one of two residents investigated under respiratory care. 3. The facility discarded two opened enteral feeding kit (a tube that delivers nutrition or hydration into the stomach or small intestine of a patient who is unable to eat or drink…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the pad call light (a device with sensitive touch surface ideal for patients who may have difficulty using standard call cord to signal need for assistance from a professional staff) was within reach for one (1) out of 37 sampled residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident not being able to call for facility staff assistance and delay of care and services that can negatively affect resident's comfort and well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/9/2024 with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia (a general term for a condition with loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and mild protein-calorie nutrition (a type of undernutrition when a person does not consume enough protein…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving enteral feeding (also known as tube feeding, a method of supplying nutrients directly into the gastrointestinal [the body's system for processing liquids and foods] tract) received appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 27) by failing to ensure the enteral feeding tube tip attached to a Y adapter (a three-way connector in which two ends are adjacent to the tubing) was covered with a cap when not in use. The deficient practice had the potential to contaminate the enteral feeding system. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/6/2021, and readmitted the resident on 11/25/2022, with diagnoses including gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD, is a chronic digestive disorder that occurs when stomach contents flow back into the esophagus) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 27's History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who need respiratory care are provided care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of two sampled residents (Resident 32) investigated under respiratory care by failing to ensure: 1. A physician's order was obtained for Resident 32's use of bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP, a noninvasive machine that helps people breathe). 2. The BIPAP mask and tubing were kept off the floor. These deficient practices had a potential for Resident 32 to develop respiratory complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 32's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/25/2022, and readmitted the resident on 9/22/2024, with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (a condition where the lungs have trouble removing carbon dioxide from the blood, causing a buildup of carbon dioxide in the blood), pleural effusion (a condition where too much fluid builds up in the space between the lungs and chest wall), and dependence on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately and safely provide or obtain pharmaceutical services to one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 36) investigated during medication administration task. The facility failed to flush the medications in between administration via gastrostomy tube (G-tube - a medical device that is inserted through the abdomen into the stomach to provide nutrition, fluids, and medications to patients who are unable to consume food or liquids by mouth). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 36 at risk of health complications such as drug interaction and delay in the provision of care. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/9/2024 and was readmitted into the facility on 4/17/2024 with diagnoses that included dementia (a general term for a condition with loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), gastrostomy status, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for one of two sampled residents (Resident 27) investigated under anticoagulants (a substance that is used to prevent and treat blood clots in blood vessels and the heart) by failing to ensure there was adequate monitoring on the use of an anticoagulant-Apixaban. The deficient practice had the potential to predispose the resident on the adverse effect (a harmful or abnormal result) of anticoagulant use such as bleeding. Findings: During a review of Resident 27's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/6/2021, and readmitted the resident on 11/25/2022, with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (a heart condition that causes an irregular heartbeat, often faster than normal), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD, a chronic digestive disorder that occurs when stomach contents flow back into the esophagus), and long-term use of anticoagulants. During a review of Resident 27's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/2/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to discard nine (9) boxes of BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self-Test ( a rapid antigen point-of-care test that can be used to diagnose an active COVID-19 [an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) used on staff and residents with expiration date of 1/18/2024 stored in the facility's Medication Room observed during medication storage and labeling facility task. The deficient practice increased the risk of the resident being misdiagnosed with COVID-19 that leads to delay in the care and treatment. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/3/2024, at 9:40 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), inside the Medication Room, 9 boxes of BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Self-Test with expiration date of 1/18/2024 was observed. LVN 1 stated they used those self-test kits to test staff and residents for COVID-19. LVN 1 stated expired medications and test kits should be disposed of after its expiration date to prevent adverse effects (a harmful or abnormal result) of drugs and false diagnosis to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the order for Restorative Nursing Assistance (RNA - a type of program in long term care facilities intended to restore lost abilities or maintain potentially deteriorating functions for residents) program was entered accurately in the electronic health record (EHR) for one (1) out of 1 sampled resident (Resident 36) during an investigation under the position/mobility care area. This deficient practice had the potential for incomplete and inaccurate medical documentation and cause a delay in provision of necessary care and services Resident 36 needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/9/2024 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a general term for a condition with loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), gastrostomy status,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program regarding Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19, a viral infection that is highly contagious and easily transmits from person to person, causing respiratory problems and may cause death) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), by failing to ensure Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) perform hand hygiene (hand washing with soap and water and use of alcohol-based hand sanitizer) before and after providing care to Resident 1 and after touching unclean surfaces. RN 1 also did not wear gloves during the blood pressure monitoring procedure on Resident 1. These deficient practices placed other residents and staff at risk for exposure and contracting COVID-19. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/28/2018. Resident 1 ' s diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis that affected one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move one side of the body) on the left side, heart failure (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review facility failed to maintain privacy of confidential information when Certified Nursing Assistant 3 (CNA 3) left an electronic health record (EHR- a digital version of a patient's paper chart) open , unattended, and out of view for one of one resident sampled (Resident 25). This deficient practice violated Resident 25's right to privacy and confidentiality of their medical records. Findings: A review of Resident 25's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/21/2020 and readmitted the resident on 10/7/2020 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (), essential (primary) hypertension (the blood is pumping with more force than normal through your arteries [blood vessels that distribute oxygen-rich blood to your entire body]), and unspecified dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning to an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). A review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement resident-centered care plans for two of 14 sampled residents (Resident 25 and Resident 87) by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 25 had a care plan addressing the use of Cefdinir (an antibiotic [medicines that treat or prevent bacterial infections] medication). 2. Ensure Resident 87 had a care plan addressing the use of a cervical collar (C-collar, a medical device used to restrict movement whenever spinal motion restriction is indicated). These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for not receiving the necessary services and treatment to meet their medical, physical, mental and psychosocial needs. Findings: a. A review of Resident 87's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 9/1/2023 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including intraspinal (being within the spine) abscess (buildup of pus) and granuloma (a cluster of white blood cells and other tissues) and cervical (neck) region…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for a resident who has a gastrostomy tube (GT- a tube inserted through the abdomen and into the stomach used to deliver nutrition or medication)) by failing to verify the route of administration for a supplement, pro-stat (a ready-to-drink concentrated liquid protein medical food) prior to administration for one of one sample resident (Resident 27). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 27 receiving the medication orally causing the resident to aspirate. Findings: A review of Resident 27's admission Records indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/6/2021 and readmitted the resident on 11/25/2022 with diagnosis that included unspecified dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning to an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), essential (primary) hypertension (the blood is pumping with more force than normal through your arteries [blood vessels that distribute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure on labeling and storage of drugs and biologicals by: 1. Failing to label two Aplisol (a sterile aqueous solution of a purified protein fraction for intradermal [done within the layers of skin] administration as an aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis [disease caused by germs that are spread from person to person through the air]) multi-dose (multiple doses) vials with an open date for one of one medication storage reviewed. 2. Failing to label MiraLAX (a brand-name, over-the-counter product that is typically used to treat short-term constipation) with an open date during medication pass observation for one of one sampled resident (Resident 27). These deficient practices increased the risk that the facility's residents could have received medication that had become ineffective or toxic due to improper storage or labeling resulting in a negative impact to their health and well-being. Findings: a. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control practices for one of one sampled resident (Resident 138), by failing to label Resident 138's oxygen tubing and humidifier with a placement (the action of putting something in a particular place) date. This deficient practice had the potential for staff to not timely change oxygen tubing and humifidier, placing the resident at risk for respiratory infection. Findings: A review of Resident 138's admission Records indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/14/2023 with diagnosis that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems) with acute exacerbation (the process of making something that is already bad even worse), dependence on supplemental oxygen, and depression (a constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest, which stops you doing your normal activities). A review of Resident 138's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 9/20/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-11-18 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC, a government-mandated form given to a patient when the facility believes their Medicare coverage for skilled services is ending) two days before the termination of services for two of three sampled residents (Residents 9 and 17) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. This deficient practice had the potential to result in responsible parties not being able to exercise their right to file an appeal. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 9's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/18/2018, and readmitted the resident on 7/11/2025, with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease (the buildup of fats, cholesterol and other substances in and on the artery walls), seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD, is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' bedrooms meet the requirement of 80 square feet (a unit of measure) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 19 of 21 rooms (Rooms 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22). This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide safe nursing care, privacy for the residents, and limit the residents' ability to maneuver personal care devices. Findings: During a general observation tour of the facility on 11/17/2025 at 8:58 a.m., observed residents in multiple resident bedrooms. The residents had adequate space to move about freely inside the rooms and nursing staff had enough space to safely provide care to these residents, with space for the beds, side tables, dressers, and resident care equipment. During an interview on 11/18/2025 at 9:17 a.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated room [ROOM NUMBER] has 4 beds with 4 residents. RN 1 stated space is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 19 of 21 resident rooms (Rooms 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 17) met the square footage requirement of 80 square feet (sq. ft., a unit of measurement) per resident in multiple resident rooms. The room size for these rooms had the potential to have inadequate space for resident care and mobility. Findings: During the recertification survey from 10/1/2024 to 10/3/2024, it was observed that the residents residing in the rooms with an application for variance had sufficient amount of space for residents to move freely inside the rooms. There was adequate room for the operation and use of wheelchairs, walkers, or canes. The room variance did not affect the care and services provided by nursing staff for the residents. On 10/1/2024, the Administrator submitted the application for the Room Variance Waiver for 19 resident rooms. The room variance letter indicated that these rooms did not meet the 80 square feet per resident requirement per federal regulation. The room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-10-02 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms meet the requirement of 80 square feet (a unit of measure) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 19 of 21 rooms (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22). This had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide safe nursing care and privacy for the residents. Findings: During a general observation tour of the facility, on 9/30/2023 at 9:10 a.m., observed residents in multiple resident bedrooms. The residents had adequate space to move about freely inside the rooms and nursing staff had enough space to safely provide care to these residents, with space for the beds, side tables, dressers, and resident care equipment. During an interview on 9/30/2023 at 9:12 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant 5, (CNA 5) stated room [ROOM NUMBER] has two beds with two residents. CNA 5 stated there were no issues with the size of the rooms and they are able to safely provide care to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,018 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARCONET, KIMBERLY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 06/01/2003 |
| MICHAIL, REYADH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2011 |
| VILLAREAL, LAURA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/06/2013 |
| WASDEN, STACY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/23/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $388K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056168. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.