Serenethos Care Center, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 94% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 36 beds and averages 31.9 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility documents, and staff interviews, the facility failed to comply with federal regulations related to the oversight of food service operations when the facility did not have a full-time dietitian and the requirements were not met as specified in established standards (California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 1265.4) for food service managers which required, employment of a full-time dietetic supervisor when the dietitian was not full time. Multiple issues were observed including the Food and Nutrition Services Department did not have a system in place to ensure the appropriate texture of food was prepared and served; the Food and Nutrition Supervisory staff did not ensure food safety and sanitation; and the Food and Nutrition Supervisory staff did not ensure staff were competent in performing necessary tasks to ensure food safety including ensuring the correct strength of sanitizer used to sanitize food-contact surfaces, and calibrating thermometers. In addition, when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-12-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff demonstrated appropriate competencies and skillsets necessary to care for residents' needs when physician prescribed food texture was not verified before serving food to residents, and when Certified Nursing Aide 3 (CNA 3) did not have the knowledge to identify the appropriate food texture in accordance with the diet order before serving food to a resident. These failures had the potential for one resident (Resident 34) out of a facility census of 35, to aspirate (to breath in or inhale foreign objects into the lungs. Aspiration can happen during choking but can also be silent, meaning there is no outward sign) and/or choke (severe difficulty breathing because of constricted or obstructed throat or lack of air) on food which could have resulted in death, when he was served a Regular texture diet (a diet that includes all textures of food including hard, tough, chewy, fibrous, stringy, dry, crispy, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2022-12-16 · tag F0800 — isolated
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to provide a resident (Resident 34) a special dietary need as well as ensure Food and Nutrition Services had a system in place for preparing and serving the correct diet texture according to the physician's order when a regular texture diet (a diet that includes all textures of food including hard, tough, chewy, fibrous, stringy, dry, crispy, and crunchy; and intended for people without chewing and swallowing issues) was prepared for a resident (Resident 34) with prescribed modified texture Full Liquid diet (a diet made with fluids and foods that are normally liquid and/or turn to liquid when they are at room temperature). This failure had the potential for one resident (Resident 34) who had documented diagnoses showing swallowing difficulty, out of a facility census of 35, to aspirate (to breathe in or inhale foreign objects into the lungs. Aspiration can happen during choking but can also be silent, meaning there is no outward sign)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that when it hired a part-time registered dietitian, the person designated to serve as the director of food and nutrition services met both the federal and/or state educational qualifications for the position. This failure had the potential for lack of competency and skill set necessary to carry out all the functions of the food services. Findings: During an interview on 6/17/25 at 10:01 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM), DM stated she was not the dietary supervisor for the facility. DM stated she covers for the sister facility, another building, but recently was orienting a new dietary supervisor who was on his way to the facility. During an interview on 6/17/25 at 10:24 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), DS stated he was the DS. DS stated he worked at the facility as the Dietary Supervisor and Maintenance Director. DS stated his duties included checking the refrigerators and making sure supply of food items are done. DS provided a food handler certification. During an interview on 6/19/25 at 10:56 a.m. with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessment for one of one sampled residents (Resident 1) was completed and coded accurately. This failure to accurately code Resident 1's PASRR assessments placed Resident 1 at risk to not receive care and services appropriate to his needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 6/19/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 has a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD, a mental condition with a persistently depressed mood and long-term loss of pleasure or interest in life, often with other symptoms such as disturbed sleep, feelings of guilt or inadequacy, and suicidal thoughts) and an eating disorder. During a review of the facility's provided letter titled Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) from Clinical Assurance Division, PASRR Section, Unable to complete PASRR II, dated 2/23/23, indicated Resident 1 had a positive PASRR I and PASRR II was not completed as Resident 1 was isolated as a health or safety precaution.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed 5% for one out of four sampled residents (Resident 23) when nursing staff administered 4% lidocaine patch to Resident 23's knees on two separate days, instead of to the back as prescribed by the physician. These failures resulted in two medication errors being identified out of 27 opportunities during an observation of medication administration leading to a medication error rate of 7.41%. These deficient practices had the potential to result Resident 23 not having pain relief. Findings: During review of Resident 23's admission Record, dated 6/19/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 23 was admitted in September 2021 with a diagnosis of heart failure (when the heart does not pump as well as it should) and osteoarthritis (a breakdown of cartilage in joints, leading to pain and stiffness) with current pathological fracture (break) of the vertebrae (spine.) During a medication pass observation on 6/17/25 at 11:49 a.m., with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the observations and interviews conducted, it was concluded that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident. This conclusion was drawn due to the discovery of expired medications found in the medication storage areas. Expired medications can no longer be considered viable or safe to administer, and thus will not meet the needs of the residents who require effective and safe pharmaceutical care. Findings: During an observation on 5/7/24, several expired medications were found in the medication cart at 01:40 PM. The following expired medications were stored at room temperature and identified: *Insulin Lispro 100unit/ml for Resident 8 with an open date of 4/2/24 *Novolog pen 100unit/ml for Resident 8 with an opened date of 4/3/24 *Novolog 100unit/ml for Resident 17 with an opened date of 4/2/24 Based on stability studies insulin that had been opened and stored at room temperature can be stored up to 30 days. The above indicated that the open date exceeded 30 days. During an observation on 5/7/24 at 02:05 PM, revealed that there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and a review of records, it was found that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. During the medication pass, eight medication errors were observed out of twenty five opportunities for five of six residents, resulting in an error rate of 32%. Findings: A review on 5/7/24 of the facility policy titled Medication Administration General Guidelines. The policy indicates that during a medication pass, residents should be identified before administering medication using at least two distinct identifiers. These identifiers may include the resident's ID band, checking the photo attached to the medical record, or verifying the resident's ID with another nursing care center staff member. It is important to note that resident room numbers or physical locations should not be used as identifiers. In summary, the policy requires healthcare providers to confirm each resident's identity using two unique methods before administering medication, ensuring that the proper individuals receive their prescribed medications. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe and sanitary manner when: 1. A trash can in the dishwashing area was left uncovered. 2. The microwave was not clean. 3. Two packs of unopened corn Tortilla and one pack of opened Tortilla with a few left in the plastic bag, had expired. 4. A half full bag of premium golden light brown sugar with no received date and still in its paper sack. 5. A half full bag of salt still in its paper sack. These failures had the potential to result in contamination of food causing food borne illness for 30 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a facility census of 31. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/24 at 9:20 a.m. with Registered Dietician (RD), in the dishwashing area of the kitchen close to the back door, there was an uncovered gray round trash can that was almost filled up with trash. No staff was observed in the vicinity using the trash can. RD confirmed the trash was supposed to be covered with a lid. According to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document reviews it was found that the facilities' Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) program was ineffective. Despite its purpose to proactively identify and prevent medication administration errors, it fell short. This was evident during a medication pass observation conducted during the survey, which revealed a concerning 32% medication error rate (See F759). Findings: During observations, interviews, and document reviews conducted on 5/7/24, regarding medication administration practices at a nursing home facility. The following is a summary of medication errors that were identified: The facility's policy requires healthcare providers to identify residents using at least two distinct identifiers before administering medications. However, LVN 1 did not follow this protocol for three residents, relying solely on memory for identification. Additionally, the policy mandates offering water or an acceptable liquid with oral medications, but LVN 1 failed to do so for Resident 30, leading to difficulties in swallowing the medications.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff followed the infection prevention and control policy and procedure (P&P) to prevent spread of infection for two of four sampled residents (Resident 30 and Resident 8) when: 1) The nebulization mask (a medical device used to deliver medication in the form of mist, which is inhaled into the lungs) of Resident 30 was not dated or labelled and left exposed in the bedside table drawer touching other personal items and the drawer surface with brownish dusty material. 2)The nebulization mask and CPAP mask (continuous positive airway pressure machine is used in the treatment of sleep apnea. This device delivers continuous pressurized air through tubing into a mask that is worn while sleeping) for Resident 8 was not dated or labelled and left exposed at the bedside table without protective covering, touching high touch surface area. These deficient practices had the potential to transmit infectious microorganisms and increase the risk of infection for residents. Findings: 1. During a record review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to maintain the dish machine in safe operating condition when the temperature did not reach 120° (degrees) Fahrenheit (F). This failure had the potential for food preparation and food service utensils placed in the dish machine to not become fully cleaned and sanitized before being used. Findings: During an observation on 5/7/24 at 8:50 a.m. with [NAME] 1, [NAME] 1 loaded items into the dish machine and ran the machine. The dish machine was put through the wash and rinse cycle continuously two times and the wash and rinse cycle indicated 100° F on the temperature dial. [NAME] 1 stated it was 100° F, not reaching 120° F. [NAME] 1 ran the dish machine again through the wash and rinse cycle and in the last cycle, it indicated 115° F on the dial. [NAME] 1 stated it was supposed to reach 120° F. During an observation on 5/8/24 at 9:40 a.m., Dietary Supervisor (DS) ran the dish machine three times. The thermometer indicated 118° F. DS stated it was should have reached a minimum of 120° F. During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-10 · tag F0912 — pattern
  Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 80 square foot of space per resident for 8 residents who occupied 4 multi-bed bedrooms. This condition had the potential to result in lack of sufficient space for the provision of care both routine and emergency and for residents to have their personal belongings at bedside. Findings: During an observation on 5/7/24 at 2:00 p.m., the following rooms and corresponding square footage (sq. ft) per bed were identified: Room Activity Room Size Floor Area Capacity 1 Resident room [ROOM NUMBER].17x11.17 sq.ft 158.28 sq.ft 2 beds 5 Resident room [ROOM NUMBER].17x11.17 sq.ft 158.28 sq.ft 2 beds 6 Resident room [ROOM NUMBER].17x11.17 sq.ft 158.28 sq.ft 2 beds 12 Resident room [ROOM NUMBER].17x11.17 sq.ft 158.28 sq.ft 2 beds During random observations of care and services from 5/6/24 to 5/9/24, there was sufficient space for the provision of care for the residents in rooms 1, 5, 6, and 12. There was no heavy equipment kept in the rooms that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $600K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA