St Anthony Care Center
553 Smalley Avenue, Hayward, CA 94541 · For profit - Partnership · 30 certified beds · (510) 733-3877 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (21) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $51,355 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-12)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 5 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.2% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 1.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 1.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 51.6% | 93.2% | 79.4% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 98% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.1%CMS range 35.4–61.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 6.7–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 3.3–14.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.19 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 25.4 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an accurate medication list that included both prescription and over-the-counter medications at the time of discharge to one out of three (Resident 1) reviewed residents. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving prescribed wound care treatment for six days post discharge. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 5/22/25, the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in March 2025 with multiple diagnoses, including pressure ulcer of sacral region (lower back), Stage 3 (also known as a bedsore, a wound that affects the top two layers of skin), hypertension (high blood pressure), and pain in left nnee. The document indicated Resident 1 was discharged from the facility on 5/16/25. During a phone interview on 5/22/25 at 2:00 p.m. with Family Member 1 (FM1), FM1 stated when she picked up Resident 1 from the facility on 5/16/25, she did not receive any verbal instructions about wound care. FM1 stated she received handwritten discharge instructions and there was nothing on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure supplies stored in the medication storage room were appropriate for use when hypodermic needles (devices intended to inject fluids into, or withdraw fluids from, parts of the body below the surface of the skin) were expired. These failures had the potential for residents to receive expired, ineffective, and contaminated medications and treatments. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE], at 12:35 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON) in the medication storage room, fourteen 18-gauge (measurement of a needle) hypodermic needles were observed in a box. The box and the individual packaged needles had listed expiration dates of [DATE]. The DON stated the needles should have been discarded so they could no longer be used. During an interview on [DATE], at 9:45 a.m., the DON stated the use of expired medical supplies might result in a loss of effectiveness. The DON also stated expired items such as needles…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe, sanitary storage and distribution of foods when 1. dates of opened food packages were not labeled. 2. temperatures of prepared foods were not logged that were served to residents for dinners on 10/7/24 and 10//14. These failures had the potential to place all residents getting meals from the kitchen to be at risk for foodborne illness potentially leading to hospitalization or death. Findings: 1. During an observation on 10/21/24, at 10:05 a.m., in the dry storage room, opened bottles of Liquid Seasoning, Tabasco sauce and Tapatio sauce were not labeled with dates they were opened. A bag of opened, shredded coconut was labeled with an open date of 1/9/24. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/21/24, at 10:10 a.m., with the Registered Dietician (RD), in the dry storage room, the RD stated staff were supposed to write the dates when items were opened and were not doing so. RD stated it was unknown when the items were opened and how long they were stored after opening. RD stated there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. follow proper handwashing/hand hygiene protocol. 2. replace a full sharps container (a puncture resistant container used to safely dispose of sharp medical objects like needles and lancets). The deficient practice had the potential for spread of infection. Findings: 1. During an observation on 10/22/24, at 9:17 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) was preparing medications for Resident 27 in the hallway. LVN 1 applied hand sanitizer to both hands, prepared the medications, touched the handles of the medication cart, locked the medication cart, and touched her eye-glasses. LVN 1 then picked up the prepared medications, went inside Resident 27's room, and handed Resident 27 his medications for administration. After touching various surfaces and a personal object, LVN 1 failed to wash or sanitize her hands prior to providing direct care to the resident. During a review of Resident 27's face sheet, printed 10/28/24, the face sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation, food handling, and food storage practices when: 1. Refrigerator 1 had two bags of iceberg lettuce that were discolored, wilted, and did not have received-by or used-by dates. 2. During tray line (serving and plating of food) service: - Pureed (a procedure to change the texture of solid food so that it is smooth with no lumps and has a texture like pudding) fish and pureed rice were watery and did not stay formed when scooped on the plate. - Scooped food on four resident plates were left uncovered after these plates were placed inside the open food cart. 3. Dietary staff switched from one kitchen task to the next without performing handwashing. 4. Dietary staff's hair was not fully secured with the hairnet. These failures had the potential to result in food contamination and resident foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. During the concurrent initial observation and interview on 11/13/23, at 9:50 a.m., in the kitchen, with the Registered Dietitian (RD) and Dietary Supervisor (DS),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted respect and dignity for four of 15 sampled residents (Resident 18, Resident 22, Resident 8, and Resident 12) when: 1. For Resident 18, Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) remained standing while feeding the resident her meal. 2. For Resident 22, CNA 2 remained standing while feeding the resident her meal. 3. For Resident 8, Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) did not provide privacy during eye drop administration. 4. For Resident 12, LVN 1 did not provide privacy during medication administration via Gastrostomy tube (GT, a medical device used to provide nutrition and medication to the stomach for people who are unable to swallow thru the mouth). These deficient practices had the potential to result in diminished individual dignity and a loss of self-esteem. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 18's admission Record, printed 11/15/23, indicated Resident 18 was admitted in 2021 with diagnoses of failure to thrive (decline in health and ability to live) and dysphagia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 26) with limited range of motion (ROM, a joint or body part with limited range of motion cannot move through its normal range of motion, also known as contractures), the facility failed to apply the ankle foot orthosis [AFO, boot(s) or external supportive devices used on lower legs/feet to stabilize the joints to prevent contractures] to Resident 26's left foot as ordered by the physician. This failure resulted in Resident 26's unmet care needs and had the potential to result in worsening of left foot contracture. Findings: A review of Resident 26's admission Record, printed 11/15/23, indicated resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (memory loss), contracture of left ankle, hemiplegia (unable to move one side of the body due to damage to the parts of the brain responsible for movement), and hemiparesis (muscle weakness on one side of the body). A review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the prevention of complications of enteral feedings for one of one sample selected resident who has a feeding tube at the facility (Resident 12) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 administered the medication and water via gastrostomy tube (GT-a tube inserted through the abdomen that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) without first checking stomach residual (amount of fluid remaining in the stomach). This failure resulted in Resident 12 vomiting after receiving the medication and water via GT, and a potential for Resident 12 to aspirate (breathe in food or liquid into the airway). Findings: A review of Resident 12's admission Record, indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including brain injury. During a concurrent interview and observation on 11/14/23, at 9:00 a.m., with LVN 1, in Resident 12's room, LVN 1 started to administer medication and water flush via GT without checking the stomach residual, and Resident 12 started vomiting immediately after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prevention of infection for one of 15 sample selected residents (Resident 12), when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not disinfect the blood pressure device between resident use. This failure had the potential of transmitting infection between the residents who are residing at the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 12's admission Record, indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including brain injury. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/14/23, at 9:00 a.m., with LVN 1, in Resident 12's room, LVN 1 removed the blood pressure device from the medication cart and without disinfecting the device, checked Resident 12's blood pressure and put the device back inside the medication cart. LVN 1 confirmed and stated she should have disinfected the blood pressure device between residents' use for infection prevention and she forgot to do that. A review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Cleaning and Disinfecting of Resident-Care items…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that enhanced the dignity of two (Residents 5 and 16) of 11 sampled residents when two staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant 1 and Certified Nursing Assistant 5) stood and leaned over the residents during feeding assistance with two meals. This failure had the potential for Residents 5 and 16 to feel embarrassed and disrespected. Findings: A review of Resident 5's admission Record, undated, indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of dementia (a chronic progressive disease marked by memory loss, personality changes and impaired reasoning). A review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to guide care) dated 9/12/2021, indicated Resident 5 was rarely able to be understood, and sometimes understood others. The MDS indicated Resident 5 required total assistance from one person for eating. During a meal observation on 11/30/2021 at 12:30 p.m., in Resident 5's room,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 11 citations
- Potential for harm · E2021-12-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, home-like environment for: 1. One of 11 sampled residents (Resident 17), when Resident 17's bed moved whenever Resident 17 stood up or sat down on the bed. Resident 17's room had a light fixture with a non-functioning bulb, the floor on one side of his bed was not cleaned, and there was a pile of empty garbage bags on the floor near the head of his bed. 2. Residents who used the shower room, when the shower room floor had an unlabeled hairbrush, with hair in the bristles, and a shelf in the shower room had the following items: a face mask, used gloves, four empty bottles of lotion, one bottle of conditioner, and an empty box of disposable razors. These failures resulted in: 1. Resident 17 feeling unsafe when transferring in or out of bed due to bed movement on the floor, having difficulty reading from inadequate lighting, and feeling staff did not care enough about him to adequately clean and tidy his room. 2. Residents who used the shower potentially having emotional distress from an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure one of (Resident 179) of 11 sampled residents received four medications as ordered by the physician. 2. Ensure expired medications were not available for resident use when one expired intravenous antibiotic (ertapenem) and one expired influenza vaccine were stored in the medication room refrigerator. These failures had the potential for: 1. Resident 179 to not receive medications as needed for therapeutic effect, or adverse effects if medications were administered too closely together. 2. A residents to receive expired, less effective medications. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 179's admission Record, undated, indicated an admission date of 11/29/2021 with diagnoses of heart failure (heart is unable to pump enough blood for the body's needs) and dementia (a brain disorder that affects the ability to remember, think clearly, communicate, and perform daily activities). A review of Resident 179's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated November 2021, indicated Resident 179 had the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and implement infection control measures for six of 11 residents (3, 5, 10, 19, 21, and 23) when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) did not perform hand hygiene (wash hands with soap and water or use an alcohol-based hand rub) between consecutive meal tray deliveries and set-up of meals for Residents 19, 21, and 5. 2. The blood pressure cuff was not sanitized between the consecutive use of Residents 10, 3, and 23. These failures had the potential to transmit infectious organisms and increase the risk of infection for residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on 12/01/21, at 12:20 p.m , CNA 1 carried a lunch tray into Resident 19's room. Resident 19 sat in a chair with an adjacent table. CNA 1 placed the lunch tray on the table, a cloth napkin on Resident 19's chest, took the covers off the food and drinks, and arranged the silverware on the tray. Without performing hand hygiene, CNA 1 exited Resident 19's room and walked to the tray cart, took a tray off the cart, and carried the tray into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide fingernail trimming and/or facial hair removal for three of 11 sampled residents (Residents 9, 19 and 5) who were unable to perform personal grooming. These failures resulted in Residents 9, 19, and 5 appearing ungroomed, and had the potential for a reasonable person to feel a diminished sense of self-esteem; the ragged nails also had the potential to cause injury from scratches or skin tears. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 19's admission Record, undated, indicated Resident 19 was admitted in June 2021 with a diagnosis of dementia (a brain disorder that affects the ability to remember, think clearly, communicate, and perform daily activities and that may cause changes in mood and personality). A review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to guide care) dated 10/29/2021, indicated Resident 19 was sometimes able to be understood, and sometimes understood others. The MDS indicated Resident 19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist's medication regimen review (MRR) was promptly acted upon for one (Residents 5) of 11 sampled residents. This failure had the potential for delayed treatment and increased risk of adverse side effects for Residents 5. Findings: A review of Resident 5's admission Record undated, indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of dementia (a brain disorder that affects the ability to remember, think clearly, communicate, and perform daily activities). A review of the facility's Consultant Pharmacist (CP) Medication Regimen Review (MRR) dated 10/29/2021, indicated This resident has been taking Risperdal 0.5 mg since 5/18/2021. The recommendation indicated please evaluate the current dose and consider a dose reduction. During an interview and concurrent record review on 12/2/2021 at 11:05 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 5's MRR dated 10/26/2021, was reviewed. The DON stated she had been so busy she had totally missed sending the pharmacist's MRR recommendations to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-12-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 23) of 11 sampled residents was free of significant medication errors when Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) did not follow the medication instructions to shake the Dilantin suspension (a liquid preparation of medication used to prevent seizures) before administration. This failure had the potential to result in uneven distribution of medication in the liquid and prevent administration of the ordered dose necessary to maintain Resident 23's therapeutic drug level (the concentration of medication in the blood stream necessary to prevent seizures). Findings: A review of Resident 23's admission Record, undated, indicated Resident 23 was admitted to the facility in May 2021 with a diagnosis of epilepsy (a neurological disorder marked by sudden recurrent episodes of sensory disturbance, loss of consciousness, or convulsions, associated with abnormal electrical activity in the brain). A review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool used to guide care) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to sanitize the ice machine's ice bin at the time of installation. This failure had the potential to result in resident food borne illness from contaminated ice. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/30/21, at 12:35 p.m., with Maintenance 1 (MTN 1), an ice machine was located on a patio against the exterior wall of the facility, near the sliding glass door of the activity room. The inside of the ice machine cabinet had a reddish-brown substance on the back and side walls above the ice bin. The reddish-brown substance was removed from the walls by a paper towel. MTN 1 stated the ice from the ice machine was used in the residents' drinking water. MTN 1 stated the ice machine was three weeks old; the facility had not previously had an ice machine. MTN 1 stated the ice machine needed to be cleaned regularly to prevent contamination of the drinking water, but he had not cleaned the machine yet. MTN 1 stated he would check for the manufacturer's recommendations on how to correctly clean the ice…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility had five residents' rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 2, 4, 5 and 8) with multiple beds that provided less than 80 square feet (sq. ft) per resident who occupied these rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space for delivery of care to each of the residents in each room, or for storage of the residents' belongings. Findings: During an observation on 10/21/24, at 10:00 a.m., the following rooms and corresponding square footage per bed were identified: Room Activity Room size Floor area 1 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER].8 x 20.3 sq. ft 297 sq. ft (74.3 per bed) 2 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER] x 21.3 sq. ft 297.5 sq. ft (74.3 per bed) 4 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER].2 x 10.4 sq. ft 146.4 sq. ft (73.2 per bed) 5 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER].2 x 9.8 sq. ft 137 sq. ft (68.5 per bed) 8 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER].4 x 17.11 sq. ft 364.3 sq. ft (72.86 per bed) During random observations of care and services from 10/21/24 to 10/24/24, there was sufficient space for the provision of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility had five residents (Rt)'s rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 2, 4, 5 and 8) with multiple beds that provided less than 80 square feet (sq. ft) per resident who occupied these rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space for delivery of care to each of the residents in each room, or for storage of the residents' belongings. Findings: During an observation on 11/13/23, at 10:00 a.m., the following rooms and corresponding square footage per bed were identified: Room Activity Room size Floor area 1 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER].8 x 20.3 sq. ft 297 sq. ft (74.3 per bed) 2 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER] x 21.3 sq. ft 297.5 sq. ft (74.3 per bed) 4 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER].2 x 10.4 sq. ft 146.4 sq. ft (73.2 per bed) 5 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER].2 x 9.8 sq. ft 137 sq. ft (68.5 per bed) 8 Rt room [ROOM NUMBER].4 x 17.11 sq. ft 364.3 sq. ft (72.86 per bed) During random observations of care and services from 11/13/23 to 11/16/23, there was sufficient space for the provision…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2021-12-03 · tag F0911 — patternEnsure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility had one resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]), that accommodated more than four residents. This failure had the potential to result in insufficient space to provide care to each of the five residents, and inadequate space to store their personal belongings. Findings: During observation of resident care in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 12/1/21 at 9:50 a.m., the staff had sufficient room to move around the residents' area as they provided care and changed linens. Privacy was always maintained during each procedure that the staff performed. Storage area for the personal belongings of each of the five residents was adequate, clean, and in good repair. The five residents did not have any complaints. There were no safety issues. Recommend granting room waiver.
- No harm found · Bcited before2021-12-03 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 17 of 17 residents in the following multiple resident bedrooms (Rooms 1, 2, 4, 5, 8) with at least 80 square feet per resident. This failure had the potential to result in a lack of sufficient space for the provision of care by facility staff and for the lack of sufficient space for residents to have personal belongings at the bedside. After observation and interview, there was adequate space for residents and staff to move about without obstruction. Recommend granting waiver. Findings: During an observation on 12/2/21 at 9:10 a.m., the following resident rooms and corresponding square footage (sq ft) were identified: Room # # of residents Total Sq Ft Sq ft/resident room [ROOM NUMBER] 4 residents 297 sq ft 74.37 sq ft/bed room [ROOM NUMBER] 4 residents 297 sq ft 74.37 sq ft/bed room [ROOM NUMBER] 2 residents 146.3 sq ft 73.19 sq ft/bed room [ROOM NUMBER] 2 residents 136.9 sq ft 72.86 sq ft/bed room [ROOM NUMBER] 5 residents 364.3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$51,355 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $51,355 — penalty dated 2024-01-12
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST ANTHONY SERENETHOS SNF LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 03/01/2015 |
| BALDWIN, RONALD | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2015 |
| XIE, QING | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2015 |
| NG, ANDREW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2018 |
| DICKMAN WESTON GROUP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2015 |
| HANSEN HUNTER LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055809. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.