We Care Skilled Nursing Facility

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 174 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 28 beds and averages 26.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan and meet the needs of three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 9 and 14) when: 1. The facility did not develop a care plan to address Resident 1's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, a tube used to deliver medications and other treatments directly to the large central veins near the heart) care. 2. The facility did not develop a care plan to address Resident 9's weight loss of 2.4lbs (pounds) in one week due to very low food and fluid intake. 3. The facility did not develop a care plan to address Resident 14's hearing loss. These failures had the potential to result in Residents 1, 9, and 14 not receiving appropriate care, monitoring, and treatment. Findings: 1. During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record', printed on 2/27/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnosis of cellulitis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication rate was five (5) percent or less when three medication errors were observed out of 25 opportunities (medication error rate was calculated as followed: three divided by 25 then multiplied by 100, which was equal to 12 percent) when: 1.Resident 71 did not receive snack/food with Metformin (an oral medication to control blood glucose in the blood) tablet. 2.Licensed Nurse did not instruct Resident 12 to press inner canthus (inner corner of the eye where the upper and lower eyelids meet) after administering eye drops. 3.Licensed Nurse did not check Resident 5's Vital Signs (measurements of the body's most basic functions, including heart rate, pulse, temperature, respirations) before, during, and/or after nebulizer treatment. These failures placed Resident 71, Resident 12, and Resident 5 at risk for ineffective/compromised effects of above-mentioned medications. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 71's physician order dated 1/21/25, indicated to give one tablet of Metformin HCl) 850 milligrams…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety when: -Frozen meats inside the refrigerator were thawed on top of ready-to-drink fresh milk. -Multiple kitchen staff used the wrong test strip to check sanitizer concentration for the three-compartment sink and dishwasher. -Frozen chicken was thawed on the food preparation counter before cooking. -Two kitchen staff did not wear hair cover during food preparation. These failures had the potential to result in cross-contamination and food-borne illnesses. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 2/24/25 at 10:22 a.m. with Dietary Manager (DM), inside the reach-in refrigerator, the following were observed: a) A pan overflowing with chicken and turkey, thawing on top of multiple gallons of fresh milk. DM stated there was not enough space in the refrigerator, so the staff had to somehow squeeze the meats in. b) DM tested the three-compartment sink sanitizer concentration by submerging two inches of the test strip in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of four sampled residents (Resident 14), reviewed for communication deficit, received proper treatment to maintain hearing ability when hearing loss was not addressed by ht facility. This failure had the potential to result in the delayed access to hearing services. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident was initially admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, difficulty walking and end stage renal disease (ESRD, the final stage of long-term kidney disease when the kidneys are no longer sufficiently able to remove waste products and excess water to support the body's needs). During a review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Assessment (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) dated 9/18/24, the MDS indicated Resident 14 had adequate hearing. During a review of another MDS dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 14 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infection for one of one sampled resident (Resident 70), when staff did not follow-up on Resident 70's complaint of painful urination. This failure had the potential to result in delayed treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 70's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 70 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition where the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter waste products and excess fluid from the blood), muscle weakness, and diabetes mellitus (a chronic/long-term disease in which the body cannot regulate the amount of sugar in the blood). During review of Resident 70's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool used to direct resident care) dated 12/27/24, the MDS indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a scoring system to determine the resident's cognitive status in regard to attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and assist in maintaining a sufficient food and fluid intake and for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 9), when Resident 9 was not offered sufficient fluid intake and weight loss was not addressed to maintain proper hydration and health. This failure had the potential to result dehydration (dangerous loss of body fluid causes by illness or inadequate fluid intake) and further decline in Resident 9's health condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record', printed on 2/27/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility in February 2025 with multiple diagnoses including urinary tract infection (an infection of the urinary tract, which includes the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and urethra) and Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination. Symptoms usually begin gradually and worsen over time. As the disease progresses, people may have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, a long, thin, flexible tube that is placed into a small vein in the upper arm and moved forward until it is in a larger vein near the heart) received appropriate care and services consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders when Resident 1's PICC line dressing was not changed and monitored for complications. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 to develop complications such as infection and dislodgement (PICC line catheter displacement). Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record', printed on 2/27/25, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in December 2024 with diagnosis of cellulitis (bacterial skin infection) of right and left lower limbs. During a record review of Resident 1's Order Summary, dated 2/27/25, the order summary indicated Resident 1 had an order to change the PICC line dressing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, for two of 15 sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 14), the facility failed to ensure; 1. An irregularity in Resident 14's medication regimen was identified by Consultant Pharmacist (CP) when fleet enema (laxative in the relief of occasional constipation, contains high levels of phosphates and sodium) was included in the bowel regimen despite Resident 14's constant refusal of phosphate binder. This failure had the potential to result in adverse events that included kidney injury. 2. Recommendation about Resident 3's medication regimen was not followed-through.This failure had the potential to result in increased risk of medication side effects. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident was initially admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, difficulty walking and end stage renal disease (ESRD, the final stage of long-term kidney disease when the kidneys are no longer sufficiently able to remove waste products and excess water to support the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 71) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to ensure Resident 71 received apixaban (anticoagulant medication that has black box warning) with adequate monitoring for adverse effects. This failure had the potential to result in undetected adverse effects from the medication. Definition: Black Box Warning (BBW) is the strongest warning that the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) requires, and signifies that medical studies indicate that the drug carries a significant risk of serious or even life-threatening adverse effects. Findings: During a review of Resident 71's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 71 was admitted to the facility in January 2025 with diagnoses that included heart failure and atrial fibrillation (common heart rhythm disorder where the upper chambers of the heart [atria] beat irregularly and rapidly) and difficulty walking. During a review of Resident 71's Order Summary Report dated 2/27/25, the Order Summary Report indicated an order for apixaban oral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
  Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the food preference and therapeutic diet as ordered by the physician for one out of 20 sampled residents (Resident 10). These failures had the potential to result in Resident 10 feeling disrespected and placed Resident 10 at risk for choking. Findings: During a review of Resident 10's admission Record, printed 2/27/25, the record indicated Resident 10 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with a diagnoses of low back pain and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, refers to a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems. It includes emphysema and chronic bronchitis.) During a record review of Resident 10's undated Breakfast Meal Ticket, the meal ticket indicated Resident 10's diet was controlled carbohydrates (a diet that is designed to manage blood sugar levels) diet with mechanical soft texture (consist of soft, easily chewed and swallowed foods). The meal ticket also indicated Dislikes: Cereal, ravioli, cranberry juice, sausage . and Beverages: 2 milks.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA