No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hemet Valley Healthcare Center

371 North Weston Pl, Hemet, CA 92543 · For profit - Corporation · 113 certified beds · (951) 766-1199 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Apr 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$51,489 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (23) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $51,489 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-25)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
391 N San Jacinto St · (951) 260-0279 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
422 N San Jacinto St · (951) 305-5500 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1470 E Florida Ave · (951) 766-8819 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Acacia Park Hemet California · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection7.5%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained7.4%0.4%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication45.7%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.9%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.0%10.2%21.2%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.8%12.0%17.1%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

2.70
RN hours/ resident / day
4.33
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
10.96
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
2.26
RN hoursweekends
51.2%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 113 beds and averages 18.3 residents a day — about 16% occupied, or roughly 95 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 10.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 9.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 11.54 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.88 to 2.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-21)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-31)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were observed, and the facility policies and procedures related to infection control were implemented when: 1. The facility did not report to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH- state agency responsible for public health in California, enforcing some of the laws affecting healthcare facilities) of a COVID 19 (coronavirus - a contagious respiratory infection) outbreak when the facility had one COVID-19 positive staff and four COVID-19 positive residents on February 5, 2025. This failure resulted in the state agency being unaware of the presence of a COVID-19 outbreak in the facility and had the potential of delayed implementation of infection control measures to address COVID-19; and 2. The facility did not implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - a strategy recommending the use of gown and gloves during provision of high-contact resident care activities (dressing, bathing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of three sampled residents (Resident A): 1. Proper positioning of a female resident with lower extremity (legs and feet) contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints) was implemented during urine sample collection with the use of a straight catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the urethra [where urine passes out of the body]). Resident A's hip and leg/thigh were lifted up six inches from the mattress for urine collection. In addition, the licensed nurse continued to collect a urine sample from Resident A despite hearing an abnormal sound from Resident A's hip area. This failure resulted in Resident A to sustain a left hip fracture (broken bone) and was subsequently transferred to the acute hospital for surgical procedure; and 2. Resident A's bluish discoloration to the left eyelid was assessed, monitored, evaluated, and referred to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the shower gurney's (a mobile, waterproof device designed to transport and bathe individuals who cannot sit upright safely) wheel brakes, used to transfer one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), were locking properly to secure positioning during resident transfer and bathing.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure.A review of Resident 1's care plan titled Potential for Falls, dated June 4, 2022, indicated the resident has potential for falls related to sensory deficit, and poor endurance related to contractures of both lower extremities.A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), dated April 12, 2025, indicated the resident has no discernible consciousness and is dependent (Assistance of 2 or more helpers is required for the resident to complete the activity) with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety and sanitation were observed in the kitchen when: 1. Nine one-gallon containers of barbeque (BBQ) sauce were undated;2. One box of rice pilaf was found to be undated;3. Multiple prepared food items in refrigerator 3 were found to be uncovered and opened to air.These failures had the potential to result in the spread of foodborne illness to the residents who consumed meals from the facility kitchen. Findings:On November 17, 2025, at 10:30 a.m., the initial kitchen inspection was conducted with the Director of Food and Nutrition (DFN). The following were found stored on the shelf in the dry storage area:- Nine one-gallon container of BBQ sauce had no expiration date; and- One box of rice pilaf had no expiration date. Multiple prepared food items were not covered and were open to air located inside refrigerator 3.On November 17, 2025, at 11:10 a.m., a concurrent interview was conducted with the DFN. The DFN stated there were no expiration dates located on the BBQ containers or the rice pilaf box.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medical food and dressing change supplies were not stored in the medication storage areas, and readily available for use.This failure had the potential for residents to receive ineffective medical food supplements and medical supplies.Findings:On November 20, 2025, at 1:12 p.m., a medication storage inspection was conducted with the Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS). The following expired items were found stored and readily available for use:a. Two sterile central line (a long, thin tube [catheter] inserted into a large vein in the neck, chest, or groin, with its tip ending in or near the heart) dressing change trays containing one each of the following outdated components:- Medium Aloe Vinyl Examination gloves with expiration date of 5/28/2025 (May 28, 2025) (4/30/2025 [April 30, 2025] - date on the insert);- Stabilization PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter- a type of central line) Statlock (brand of suture free medical stabilization device) with an expiration date of 08/28/2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan (a detailed written document that outlines a resident's healthcare needs, goals, and treatment strategies) was developed, for four of four residents (Residents 2, 14, 16, and 17) , when the residents had COVID -19 (coronavirus - a contagious respiratory infection) infection. This failure had the potential for the staff not to be aware of the appropriate interventions needed to be implemented to address the resident's changes in health condition. Findings: On February 20, 2025, at 09:05 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint regarding infection control and nursing services. On February 20, 2025, at 12:43 p.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) was interviewed. The IP stated the facility had a Covid outbreak on the evening shift of February 5, 2025. The IP stated Residents 2, 14, 16, and 17, were positive for COVID-19 on February 5, 2025. On February 20, 2025, at 3:30 p.m., Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment, for one of 21 residents (Resident 4), when Resident 4 was placed in the activity room when the resident was re-admitted back to the facility for five days. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the resident's emotional and social well-being. Findings: On February 20, 2025, at 09:05 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint regarding infection control. On February 20, 2025, Resident 4's record was reviewed. Resident 4 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute - on chronic respiratory failure (condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body), hydrocephalus (abnormal accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid in the brain), psychosis (a mental disorder where there is a severe loss of contact with reality), and tracheostomy (a hole surgically created…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-31 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit staffing information based on payroll data to the Federal (Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services- CMS) database for the second Fiscal Quarter (FQ) of the year. This failure had the potential to result in inaccuracy of numbers of Direct Care Staff needed to provide care to residents. This failure also prevented the provision of complete and accurate direct care staffing information to the public. Findings: A review of the CMS PBJ (pay roll based journal) Staffing Data Report CASPER (Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Report) FY (fiscal year) Quarter 2 (January 1- March 31) indicated, .Failed to submit Data for the Quarter . During an interview on with the Director of Nursing Services (DON) on July 30, 2024, at 2:30 p.m., the DON stated the Infection Preventionist (IP) was also was responsible for submitting the report to CMS. However, during the said reporting period, the facility was having several issues with staffing and she and the IP were still transitioning in their roles, hence the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Information regarding formulation of Advanced Directive (AD- a written document that indicates a resident's medical wishes) was provided to the Residents' Representatives (RR), for two of 14 residents reviewed for AD (Residents 18 and 7); and 2. Resident 11's AD was not readily available in the resident's medical record. These failures had the potential for the resident/resident representative's current wishes for medical care not to be honored. Findings: 1. On July 29, 2024, Resident 18's record was reviewed. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 18's Resident Representative (RR- makes decisions for the resident due to the resident not having mental capacity to make medical decisions) was his family member (FM). Resident 18's History and Physical, dated July 10, 2024, indicated a history of alcohol and cocaine use, post assault, stroke, status post craniotomy (opening in the skull to access the brain for surgery),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication (Residents 17 and 18) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when: 1. For Resident 17, the facility did not have the prescriber-documented rationale for extended use of the as-needed (PRN) lorazepam (a psychotropic medication for anxiety) beyond 14 days; 2. For Resident 18, the facility did not monitor the effectiveness of the antipsychotic (quetiapine - medication to treat mental illness). These failures had the potential to result in unnecessary use of medications. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on July 31, 2024 at 2:50 p.m., with staff pharmacist (RPH) 1 and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 17's electronic medical record was reviewed. The record indicated a physician's order, dated June 27, 2024, for lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg - unit of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety requirements for food storage and sanitary food preparation were followed in the kitchen when: 1. Multiple items in the walk-in refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage area were not labeled and/or left open to air; 2. Multiple kitchen equipment and areas in the kitchen were not clean; 3. Cooking pans were stacked wet with puddle of water at the bootom of each pot; and 4. Freezers 2 and 3 had ice buildup on the floors. This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk for foodborne illness or to receive an incorrect food or outdated food items. Findings: On July 28, 2024, at 9:50 a.m. an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the weekend Dietary Aide (DA), Dietary Supervisor (DS) , and the Deputy Regional Director (DRD). The following were observed: - In walk in refrigerator 4 (four), 4 bags of red grapes and 8 heads of green leafy lettuce stored in plastic containers without a lid, open to air. Dietary Aide 1 (DA1) stated the food should never be stored open to air.'' -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices when: 1. One out of four licensed nurses used her finger to check the water temperature before use for diluting medications and flushing the feeding tube (a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition and medications directly to the stomach or small intestine) for Resident 2; 2. Two out of four nurses did not perform hand hygiene before administering eye drops to Residents 2 and 5; and 3. One suction canister was found not labeled or dated. These failures had the potential to spread infections between residents and staff. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on July 30, 2024 at 9:34 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was observed putting on a pair of gloves and preparing nine medications, including feeding tube medications and eye drops, for Resident 2 outside the resident's room. Wearing the same gloves, LVN 1 entered the room and filled up the water pitcher at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 11 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of 18 residents, the facility failed to ensure interventions were placed to address Resident 4's frequent shower refusals . This failure had a potential to result in a delay in the care and treatment of Resident 4's skin conditions and to develop new skin conditions. Findings: On July 29, 2024, at 2:33 p.m., Resident 4's record was reviewed. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure (not enough oxygen in the blood) and diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugars). The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated May 5, 2024, indicated Resident 4 had a BIMS score of zero, indicating severely cognitive function. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), included physician's orders for Nystatin (an antifungal- medication to prevent fungal growth) powder to the following areas: - Inflamed skin under left axillary (armpit) area; - Inflamed skin under left breast; - Inflamed skin under right breast; - Inflamed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop policies and procedures for the monthly drug regimen review. This failure had the potential for delayed identification of harmful drug interactions, side effects, and inadequate monitoring that could negatively impact residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: On July 31, 2024 at 11:30 a.m., during a concurrent interview and record review with the Director of Pharmacy (DOP), the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) were reviewed. There was no documented evidence the facility had developed and implemented written policies and procedures for monthly drug regimen reviews by a pharmacist. On July 31, 2024 at 1:26 p.m., during an interview with the DOP, the DOP stated there was no current policy addressing monthly drug regimen review.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 9.68% when three medication errors occurred out of 31 opportunities during medication administration, for two out of four residents (Residents 2 and 5). This failure resulted in medications not given according to the prescriber's orders and/or manufacturer's specifications and had the potential for residents to not receive the full therapeutic effects of medications. Findings: 1a. During a medication pass observation on July 30, 2024 at 9:34 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was observed preparing and administering nine medications to Resident 2. The medications included tobramycin (to treat eye infections) 0.3% eye drops. During an observation on July 30, 2024 at 10:03 a.m. in Resident 2's room, LVN 1 administered one drop of tobramycin into Resident 2's left eye and then one drop into the right eye. During a review of Resident 2's electronic medical record, the record indicated a physician's order dated June 3, 2024 for tobramycin sulfate 0.3% eye drops, to be administered as one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment was provided, when two (2) air vents above Resident 17 and 107's beds were found to be stained with dark colored dust particles. This failure had the potential to cause and/or worsen medical conditions of the residents who have respiratory conditions which could lead to respiratory distress. Findings: On July 30, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing DON) and the Deputy Regional Director (DRD) confirmed that there was staining and dark colored dust particles coming for the air vents above bed of 409A and 410A and that these particles could cause harm to the residents. On July 30, 2024 Resident 17 record was reviewed. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure (not enough oxygen in the blood). On July 30, 2024 Resident 170 record was reviewed. Resident 170 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of three sampled residents (Resident A), an injury of unknown origin was reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) immediately, or not later than two hours, when Resident A was found to have a bluish discoloration on the side of the eye. This failure had the potential to result in a delay of the implementation of appropriate action and the provision of protection for Resident A and placed other residents at risk for further abuse. Findings: On March 28, 2024, at 3:10 p.m., an announced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a facility reported incident regarding injury of unknown origin. On March 28, 2024, at 3:18 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). She stated Resident A's family notified the staff that they had noticed bruising on Resident A's left eyelid which the family member thought occurred when she was showered by the staff on December 25, 2023. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety requirements for food storage and preparation were followed when: 1. Multiple food items stored in the walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer were not labeled with the name of the food item, the date open, prepared date or use-by date; 2. Open food items stored in the dry storage area were not labeled with the name of the food item, the opened date, or use-by date; 3. The kitchen can opener had an accumulation of a thick brown substance on and around the blade; and 4. One dented can in the dry storage area was readily available for use. These failures had the potential to place the residents of the facility at risk for foodborne illness, or to receive an incorrect food, or outdated food items. Findings: On June 20, 2022, beginning at 9:25 a.m., during the kitchen tour with the Director of Food and Nutrition Service (DFNS) in the skilled nursing facility, the following items were observed stored in the walk-in refrigerator: - 22 Styrofoam cups of fresh salad, were not labeled with the name…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure a clean environment for the residents and visitors was provided when one dumpster was observed without a lid and the lids of two dumpsters were not securely closed. This failure had the potential to attract pests, insects, and vermin which could create an unsanitary environment for vulnerable residents residing in the facility. Findings: On June 23, 2022, at 10:35 a.m., three dumpsters were observed outside the facility. One dumpster was observed without a lid and contained garbage trash. The lides of two dumpsters (one with garbage trash and one with cardboard boxes) were observed to be wide open (not securely closed). On June 23, 2022, at 10:38 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated one dumpster was missing a cover lid and the two dumpsters lids were wide open. He stated the dumpster lids should have been completely closed. The facility's policy and procedure titled, Medical Waste Management Plan, dated June 23, 2022, was reviewed. The policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure; 1. The residents and/or resident's representative (RR) was provided a written information regarding formulating an Advance Directive (AD - a written instruction such as a living will, relating to the provision of treatment and services when the individual is unable to make decisions), for four of 13 residents reviewed for AD (Resident 1, 29, 238 and 240); and 2. A follow up with the resident was conducted regarding obtaining a copy of the resident's AD, for one of 13 residents reviewed (Resident 10). These failures had the potential to result in not determining and/or following the residents' wishes related to the provision of medical treatment and health care services when the residents become unable to make decisions for themselves. Findings: On June 20, 2022, Residents 1, 10, 29, 238, and 240's record review were reviewed. 1a. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included cellulitis (skin infection). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical supplies were dated, and expired medical supplies were removed from storage and not readily available for use. These failures increased the potential for the residents in an already vulnerable state to receive expired medical supplies with less accuracy and effectiveness. Findings: On [DATE], beginning at 9:53 a.m., during the medication storage area inspection in the sub-acute unit was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, the following medical supplies were observed to be undated and expired, and were readily available for use: 1. Two Accu-Chek Inform II control solutions (used to calibrate the Accu-Chek Inform II machine [machine that measures the sugar in the blood]) were found with no label indicating when it was opened or used by date; 2. Two Accu-Chek Inform II control solutions were found with a used by date of [DATE]; In a concurrent interview with RN 1, she stated the Accu-Check solution should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-27 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to provide food and nutrition services according to professional standard of food service safety for 19 of 19 sampled residents, when the fresh salad and the fruit cocktail served to all residents were not covered. This failure had the potential for food contamination and foodborne illnesses. Findings: On June 20, 2022, at 12:16 p.m., during lunch meal observation in the skilled nursing facility. Registered Nurse (RN) 2 was observed checking all the residents' tray to verify the diet orders. The fresh salad in the styrofoam cups and fruit cocktail placed in the small cups were observed not covered on all the meal trays. The meal trays were served to the 19 residents. In a concurrent interview with RN 2, she stated the fresh salad and the fruit cocktail should have been covered. On June 20, 2022, at 12:42 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 87, she stated there were times she had received food not covered, like salad or desert. On June 22, 2022, at 1:36 p.m., an interview was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control measures were implemented when multiple facility staff did not wear the proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment - mask, gown, gloves, face shield or goggles) while providing care or working inside the PUI Unit (Person Under Investigation - a resident suspected of having or exposed to COVID-19 [coronavirus-an illness caused by a virus that can spread from person to person]), when: 1. One facility staff was observed wearing N95 mask (a mask to filter airborne particles) over a surgical mask while cleaning inside the resident's room in the PUI unit, located in the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF); and 2. Facility staff in the Sub Acute Unit (SA) were observed not wearing a face shield or goggles while providing direct patient care to the PUI residents. In addition, one facility staff was observed wearing an N95 mask over a long facial hair. These failures had the potential to result in the transmission of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$51,489 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $51,489 — penalty dated 2025-02-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PHYSICIAN FOR HEALTHY HOSPITALS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST44%since 09/15/2010
WILLIAM E THOMAS PROFIT SHARING PLAN AND TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 04/23/2013
THOMAS, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER6%since 04/23/2013
COLLINS, JOHNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/23/2016
MCLAUGHLIN, DANIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/23/2016
AGARWAL, ASHOKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/15/2010
CHAUDHURI, KALIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/15/2010
GUPTA, NEELAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/13/2010
GUPTA, RAKESHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/15/2010
HUGHES, LARRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/13/2010
KOLLI, HEMCHANDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/15/2010
NAKKA, SREENIVASAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/15/2010
PUROHIT, GIRDHARIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/15/2010
RASTOGI, ANILIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/15/2010
TIWARI, BHOODEVIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/15/2010
TIWARI, RATANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/15/2001
WHITE, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/15/2010

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555623. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next