No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Village Healthcare Center

2400 West Acacia Avenue, Hemet, CA 92545 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 54 certified beds · (951) 766-5116 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (951) 766-5116 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$20,046 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,046 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-23)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2573 W Florida Ave · (951) 658-7284 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3349 W Florida Ave · (951) 766-5100 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2825 W Florida Ave · (951) 228-4880 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2350 W Latham Ave · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.0%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.8%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.4%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.9%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.8%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control10.2%10.2%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.3%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.8%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.3%11.2%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
25.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.62U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.33hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.7%CMS range 47.6–69.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.8–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge25.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge20.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge25.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.3%CMS range 4.2–14.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
1.47
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.40
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
40.3%
Total nursing turnover
0.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 40.2 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.40 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.17 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.78 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-13)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive systemic approach, to ensure effective monitoring and systems to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, for two of three sampled residents (Resident 17 and 28), when: 1.The facility's Registered Dietitian (RD) failed to: a. Follow the facility's policy titled, Nutritional Assessment, to assess Resident 17's nutritional status; and monitor the effectiveness of nutritional interventions for Resident 17; and b. Follow the facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, to identify an unplanned severe weight loss in a timely manner for Resident 17. These failures resulted in Resident 17 to experience a severe weight loss of seven (7) pounds (lbs - unit of measurement) (6.3%) in three (3) weeks, and 10 pounds (8.8%) in 1 month which placed the resident at risk for further decline in health. 2. The facility's Registered Dietitian failed to follow the facility's policy titled, Nutrition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-01-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional care and services were provided, for one of three residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 22), when: 1. Weekly weights monitoring were not completed as ordered by the physician; and 2. There was no assessment and interventions initiated to address Resident 22's continued poor food intake and weight loss. In addition, there was no follow up assessment conducted by the Registered Dietitian (RD) to address Resident 22's poor food intake and weight loss. These failures resulted in Resident 22 to have a weight loss of 16.1 pounds (lbs.)/10% (percent) from December 16, 2021 to January 12, 2022 (27 days), which could subsesquently cause further decline in the health status of Resident 22. Findings: On January 10, 2022, at 1:01 p.m., Resident 22 was observed lying in bed. Resident 22's lunch meal was observed on top of the bedside table, untouched. In a concurrent interview with Resident 22, she stated ,I did not eat my…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for resident's discharge plans, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident A).This failure had potential for the staff not to be aware of discharge plans for Resident A.Findings:On January 30, 2026, at 9:15 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate resident discharge.On January 30, 2026, at 12:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident A. Resident A stated she would like to be discharged to her home but is aware she is not ready and prefers to stay longer in the facility to work with the physical therapist. On January 30, 2026, Resident A's record was reviewed. Resident A's admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included aftercare for below knee amputation (removal of a limb).A review of Resident A's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated January 12, 2026, indicated a BIMS (Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen were observed, when: 1. Dust was found in multiple areas of the kitchen and on several kitchen equipment; 2. Grime buildup was found on the bottom of the cold storage shelves and on the walk in Refrigerator's (Ref) # (number) 1 inner door; and 3. Multiple residents' food items were stored in the nurses' station refrigerator undated and out of date. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for food-borne diseases (illness that result from ingestion of contaminated food) that can cause sickness and/or death. Findings: 1. On June 9, 2025, at 9:05 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the Food Server Director (FSD) in the kitchen area. The FSD confirmed Ref #4's fan surface was dusty. On June 9, 2025, at 9:07 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the FSD in the kitchen area. The FSD confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of the residents' wishes regarding their care were maintained, for four of six residents reviewed for Advance Directives (AD - a written instruction relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated) (Residents 3, 13, 93 , and 26) , when: 1. Resident 3, 13, and 93's ADs were not readily available in their charts; and 2. For Resident 26, there was no documented evidence information was provided to the resident regarding AD formulation. These failures had the potential for the resident's decisions regarding their healthcare and treatment to not be honored. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 3's record indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), mild protein calorie malnutrition, and depression. Resident 3's History and Physical Examination, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 3 did not have the capacity to understand and make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper labeling and storage of medical supplies and medication conformed to national standards and the facility policy and procedure when: 1. During medication administration observation, Resident 95's furosemide (medication used to help the body get rid of extra fluid and salt) bubble pack label did not include the blood pressure holding parameters (instructions for when the medication should not be given). This failure had the potential for the medication to be administered outside of holding parameters. 2. During medication storage inspection, the following were observed: a. Three bottles of iron tablets, with expiration dates of April 2025, were stored in the medication cabinet readily available for use; b. One opened container of Metamucil (used to treat constipation), labeled for a discharged resident and with an expiration date of November 2024, was stored in the medication cabinet readily available for use; and c. One open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Food and Nutrition Services associates were trained and competent to carry out the functions of the department safely and effectively when: 1. Food Service (FS) staff did not use three separate steps (wash, rinse and sanitize) to clean and sanitize work surfaces and soiled equipment, according to the facility's policy and procedure; and 2. FS staff did not follow the manufacturer's guidelines for the length of time required for dipping the test strip into the sanitizer (sanitizing solution used for sanitizing food contact surfaces) when testing the concentration of the sanitizer. These failures had the potential for food utensils and dishes to be improperly sanitized, and may result in food-borne illnesses in the vulnerable resident population. Findings: 1. On June 10, 2025, at 2:11 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with FS 1, FS 1 was observed cleaning a dirty meal cart. FS 1 stated she used a blue bucket with soap and water solution to clean the work surfaces of the kitchen or soiled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Food and Nutrition Services staff followed the Cook's spreadsheet when: 1. For Residents 14 and Resident 25, the appropriate dessert was not served during lunch on June 9, 2025; and 2. For Residents 14, 18, and 25, the pot roast meat was not served with gravy during lunch on June 9, 2025. These failures had the potential for residents on oral diets to not receive the adequate nutrition which can further compromise their medical status. Findings: 1. On June 9, 2025, at 12:33 p.m., a concurrent observation of the lunch meal trays of Residents 14 and 25 was conducted with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) in the dining room. The food trays were observed to each contain a cup of cherry crisp. In a concurrent interview, the DSD stated Residents 14 and 25 received a cherry crisp each as dessert. The DSD further stated both Residents 14 and 25 were on CCHO (controlled carbohydrate- less sugar) diet because they were diabetics (with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate food texture was provided, for nine of nine residents reviewed (Residents 14, 142, 2, 3, 93, 20, 241, 18, and 17), when: 1. Residents on mechanical soft diet did not receive ground pork and chopped vegetables according to the cook's spreadsheet during lunch on June 9, 2025; and 2. Residents on mechanical soft diet were served with potatoes skin during lunch on June 9, 2025. These failures had the potential for the residents to choke on the food. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's menu spreadsheet for lunch on June 9, 2025, indicated residents on mechanical soft diet were to receive ground pork and chopped vegetables as the main entrée. On June 9, 2025, at 12:18 p.m., during meal tray distribution observation, the pot roast meat was observed to have whole coarse strands of meat which measured approximately one inch in size. There was no ground meat for the pot roast in the trayline. The vegetables were observed to have large chunks similar to vegetables intended for residents on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention and control practices were implemented, when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was observed removing one tablet of Metoprolol (a blood pressure medication) from the medicine cup using bare forefinger, during medication administration observation. In addition, LVN 1 was observed not disinfecting the blood pressure (BP) apparatus before and after resident use. These failures had the potential to spread infection among the vulnerable residents of the facility. Findings: On June 12, 2025, at 9:16 a.m., a medication administration observation was conducted with LVN 1. The following were observed: - LVN 1 poured Resident 94's medications, including one tablet Metoprolol 25 mg (milligram- unit of measurement) into one medicine cup on top of the medication cart (med cart). LVN 1 stated the medication was not to be administered if Resident 94's systolic (upper number) blood pressure was less than 110 mmHg (millimeters mercury- unit of measurement for pressure). LVN 1 stated Resident 94's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper maintenance of essential equipment, when water was found dripping from the condenser unit (removes heat from the refrigerator and cooling it down to a liquid state) of Refrigerator (Ref) #3 . This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for food-borne diseases (illness that result from ingestion of contaminated food) that can cause sickness and/or death. Findings: On June 9, 2025, at 10:10 a.m., during the initial kitchen tour, an observation of Ref #3 was conducted. Inside Ref#3, the condenser unit was located at the top back wall of Ref#3. Water was observed dripping down from the condenser unit into a 1/8 6-inch deep metal pan, which was below the condenser unit and resting on the top shelf of the refrigerator. The metal pan was full to the brim with water, with water overflowing and dripping onto some food items on the lower shelves. In a concurrent interview with the Food Server Director (FSD), the FSD stated the water leak came from the condenser unit, and maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, when: 1. Stacks of dirty pots, pans, and dishes in the three-sections sink area, several with food on them and more dirty dishes noted on a metal shelf across from the three-section sink, one filled with an egg like mixture. 2. Food particles, crumbs, a cookie, broken eggshells, a plastic bowl, and various wrappers were under the stoves and ovens. This failure had the potential to attract further rodents in the kitchen who could transmit disease to 43 of 44 medically compromised residents by contaminating food and food contact surfaces. Findings: On January 27, 2025, at 9:45 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint regarding dietary services. On January 27, 2025, at 11:30 a.m., an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the Dietary Supervisor (DS). The DS stated the kitchen crew cleans the kitchen three times a day, after each meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure three (Resident D, E, and F) of 13 residents (Residents D, E, and F), received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet each resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, when: 1. Resident D did not receive antibiotic (used to treat infection) medication as ordered by the physician. In addition, the topical treatments for Resident D's moisture associated skin damage (MASD - skin inflammation that occurs when the skin is exposed to moisture for a long time); 2. Resident E's neurocheck (a series of tests to check the brain, spinal cord, and nerve function) was not conducted according to the physician's order after the resident fell; and 3. Resident F was not administered medication to address constipation according to the physician's order. These failures have the potential to result in a delay in the care and treatment for Resident D, E, and F, and could have affect their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure accurate skin assessments and wound care treatment were provided to promote the healing and prevention of new pressure injuries from developing, for three of 13 residents (Residents A, B, and C). These failures have the potential to result in delayed wound healing. Findings: On January 27, 2025, at 9:45 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate quality of care and treatment complaints. On January 28, 2025, at 2 p.m. an interview was conducted with the Treatment Nurse (TN). The TN stated if a resident develops a pressure ulcer/injury (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence), the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) are usually the first ones to notice and would report their findings of the wound to her. The TN stated she would conduct the following procedures when a resident was identified with a pressure ulcer/injury: - Evaluate the resident's skin; -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse, for one of three residents (Resident G), was reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH - State Agency) immediately or within two hours after the facility was made aware of the alleged abuse. This failure resulted in a delayed investigation by CDPH and had the potential to expose the resident to further abuse. Findings: On January 27, 2025, at 9:45 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of abuse. On January 28, 2025, at 10 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP stated an allegation of abuse was discussed during a stand up meeting on January 24, 2025, that Resident G reported to the licensed nurse at around 9 p.m., on January 23, 2025, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) pushed her. The IP stated the facility decided not to report to CDPH Resident G's allegation of abuse as it was decided as a false allegation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation of an allegation of physical abuse was conducted, for one of three residents (Resident G), after the facility was made aware of the allegation of abuse. This failure had the potential to result in further abuse for Resident G, which could affect the resident's emotional and psychosocial well-being. Findings: On January 27, 2025, at 9:45 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of abuse. On January 28, 2025, at 10 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP). The IP stated an allegation of abuse was discussed during a stand up meeting on January 24, 2025, that Resident G reported to the licensed nurse at around 9 p.m., on January 23, 2025, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) pushed her. On January 28, 2025, at 4:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Medical records (DOMR). The DOMR stated stand-up meetings with all department heads…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure, for four of six residents reviewed (Residents A, B, C, and D), wound management to treat pressure ulcers (localized area of skin and tissue damage caused by prolonged pressure on the skin) was provided according to the plan of care, when: 1. For Resident A, there was no comprehensive assessment (indicating measurement, color, tissue appearance, presence of drainage, odor, appearance of surrounding tissue) of the re-opened sacral wound; 2. For Resident B, there was no comprehensive assessment of the wound on the bilateral buttocks upon admission. In addition, there was no weekly re-evaluation of the bilateral buttocks wound the week of September 18 to 20, 2024; 3. For Resident C, there was no treatment provided to the left buttock pressure ulcer. In addition, there was no comprehensive assessment of the left buttocks wound upon admission; and 4. For Resident D, there was no comprehensive assessment of the left buttocks pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained from the resident or resident representative for the use of psychotropic (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) medications, for four of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 12, 15, 17, and 19),when the facility's informed consent forms were not properly completed and signed by the resident or resident representative and the physician who obtained the informed consent. This failure resulted in the resident and/or resident's representative to not be informed of the risk and benefits of the proposed care and treatment regarding the use of the psychotropic medications. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, indicated Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of depression (a mental health disorder). During a review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated May 3, 2024, indicated a BIMs (Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Three of five emergency kits (e-kit; a kit/box containing medications and supplies for immediate use during a medical emergency) were not replaced timely after being opened. This failure had the potential for emergency medication to be unavailable when needed. 2. Controlled substance medications (medication with a high potential for abuse and addiction) were accurately accounted for on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the Drug Control Receipt Record/Disposition Form (count sheet - an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications), for two of four residents reviewed (Residents 17 and 19). This failure had the potential to not have an accurate accountability of controlled medications and the potential for abuse or misuse of these medications. In addition, both failures had the potential for not meeting the residents' therapeutic (related to healing of a disease) needs or worsening of their medical conditions. Findings: 1. On May 20, 2024, at 9:46 a.m., during an inspection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the temperature in the medication refrigerator was monitored twice daily, according to the facility's protocol. This failure had the potential for the medications stored in the medication refrigerator to not be stored in a proper temperature to maintain its efficacy and/or full therapeutic effects in which can lead to unsafe administration of medications to residents. Findings: On May 20, 2024, at 9:46 a.m., during a concurrent interview and inspection of the facility's medication room with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, the medication refrigerator was observed to have contained vaccines, insulin products, a refrigerated emergency kit (medications for use in the emergency), and other refrigerated medications. RN 1 stated the medication refrigerator temperatures were expected to be checked and documented on the Temperature Log by the licensed nurse twice daily at each shift. A review of the medication refrigerator temperature logs from September 2023 to May 2024, indicated they were incomplete and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food service employees were able to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services safely and effectively when: 1. Prep [NAME] did not document the cooling process for tuna salad made on May 20, 2024; 2. Prep [NAME] and [NAME] 2 were unable to demonstrate the cooling process for tuna salad; 3. [NAME] 2 did not know how to calibrate thermometer; 4. Dishwasher 2 did not know how long kitchenware need to immerse into sanitizer; 5. Dishwasher 1 and Dishwasher 2 did not follow manufacturer guideline instruction time length for dipping test strip in sanitizer to check the concentration of sanitizer; 6. [NAME] 1 prepared grainy broccoli for two Residents (Resident 135 and 281) who had physician prescribed pureed diet texture (the food texture should be smooth for residents who have difficulty chewing and/ or swallowing ability) during lunch on May 21, 2024. (Cross referred F 805). These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness for 37 out of 37 sampled residents who received foods from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices were implemented when: 1. Prep [NAME] did not monitor the cooling process for tuna salad prepared on May 20, 2024; (Cross reference 802) 2. Dishwasher 1 did not cover his mustache; 3. Can opener base had residue buildup; 4. Rusted shelves were found in the kitchen; 5. Dust was found in the kitchen; 6. Trash were found on the walk-in freezer floor; 7. The ice machine's deflector (a piece of plastic cover inside ice bin to prevent harvested ice from filling up in the front of the storage bin) had residue buildup; 8. [NAME] shelves' plastic coating in refrigerator number (#) 4 was worn off; 9. The vent above the stove was covered with grease and dust; 10. Opened food items exposed to air in the walk-in freezer; 11. There was condensation on the ventilation above the dish machine; 12. Two microwaves in the dining room had residue buildup. These failures had the potential to increase the risk of cross-contamination and exposure to microorganisms that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan (specific interventions to provide effective and person-centered care to meet the resident's needs) was initiated for the use of apixaban (medication that helps prevent blood clots), for two of five residents (Residents 8 and 12). This failure had the potential to result in the delay in treatment and care for Residents 8 and 12. Findings: On May 22, 2024, Resident 8's record was reviewed. Resident 8 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis which included atrial fibrillation (a condition which causes the heart to beat faster than normal). A review of the Resident 8's Order Summary, dated April 29, 2024, indicated, .Eliquis (another name for apixaban) Oral Tablet 5 mg (milligram- unit of measurement) Give 5 mg by mouth two times a day for AFIB (atrial fibrillation). On May 22, 2024, Resident 12's record was reviewed. Resident 12 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis which included acute embolism (a sudden blocking of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities during the monthly medication regimen review (MRR), for one of five sampled residents (Resident 19), when: 1. Zoloft (another name for sertraline [a psychotropic medication for depression]) was administered without adequate behavioral and manufacturer's specified monitoring documented during use; and 2. Escitalopram (a psychotropic medication for depression) was administered without adequate behavioral monitoring documented during use. These failures had the potential for the medication to not be optimized for best possible health outcome, and had the potential for unnecessary or prolonged use of the medication which could lead to adverse effects and unidentified risks associated with the use of psychotropic medications that included but not limited to sedation, respiratory depression, constipation, anxiety, agitation, and memory loss. Findings: During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of four residents (Residents 8 and 12) who were receiving Eliquis (another name for apixaban [medication to prevent clots]) were free from unnecessary medications when the nursing staff did not monitor for signs and symptoms of side effects related to the use Eliquis. This failure had the potential for the side effects of Eliquis (such as bleeding, excessive bruising, and others) medication to be undetected or unrecognized for timely intervention. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, dated May 22, 2024, it indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat). A review of Resident 8's physician's orders indicated the following: - April 29, 2024 - .Eliquis Oral Tablet 5 milligram (mg, unit of measurement) Give 5 mg by mouth two times a day for AFIB (atrial fibrillation) .; and - May 12, 2024- .Eliquis .Monitor for s/sx (signs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for one of five sampled residents (Resident 19) was free from unnecessary psychotropic (affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when: 1. Resident 19 was receiving Zoloft (another name for sertraline [a psychotropic medication for depression - mood disorder]) and was administered without adequate behavioral and manufacturer specified monitoring documented; 2. Resident 19 was receiving Escitalopram (medication for depression) and was administered without adequate behavioral monitoring documented; and 3. Resident 19 was receiving PRN (as-needed) Xanax (another name for alprazolam (medication for anxiety [feeling of restlessness) and was administered without prescriber-documented rationale and specified duration for extended use beyond 14 days. These failures had the potential to result in unnecessary use of medications for Resident 19, which increased the potential for medication interactions, adverse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rates are below 5 percent, for two of ten residents (Residents 131 & 138), observed during medication administration. These failures resulted in medication error rate of 19.23 percent in which resulted in medications not to be given according to the physician orders. In addition, these failures had the potential for the residents to not receive the full therapeutic (relating to the healing of disease) effects of the medications. Findings: 1. On May 21, 2024, at 8:58 a.m., during a medication pass observation with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 was observed to have prepared and administered four medications to Resident 138. The medications included one aspirin (used to prevent blood clots) enteric-coated (EC [tablet designed to pass through the stomach and get absorbed into the bloodstream by the small intestine]) tablet, one sennosides (another name for Geri-Kot [used for constipation]) tablet, and one Trelegy Ellipta (used for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate food texture was provided, for two of two residents (Resident 135 and 281) who had a physician-prescribed pureed diet (food that has been grounded, pressed and/or strained to a soft smooth consistency like pudding). This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk of aspiration (accidentally inhaling food or liquid into the lungs), choking, and decreased meal intake. Findings: (Cross referred 802) On May 21, 2024, at 11:39 a.m., a concurrent noon prep pureed meal observation and interview was conducted with [NAME] (CK) 1. CK 1 placed five scoops of broccoli in the mixer and gradually added 2.5 cups milk to make pureed broccoli. End product of pureed broccoli was observed to have some fiber. On May 21, 2024, at 1:23 p.m., a test tray (to evaluate the quality of a meal during a meal service and identify any areas for improvement) of pureed foods was conducted with the Food Service Director (CDM). One teaspoon of the pureed broccoli was tasted and the pureed broccoli had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the diet order was followed according to the physician's order, for two out of nine sampled residents (Residents 12 and 15) when: 1. Resident 12, did not receive large portions on May 21,2024 lunch meal tray according to the diet ordered by the physician; and 2. Resident 15, did not receive fortified food items (food items enriched with high calories to help gain weight) on May 21, 2024 lunch meal tray according to the diet ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential to result in not improving Resident 12 and 15's weight, further compromising Resident 12 and 15's nutritional and medical overall condition. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility provided document titled, Diet Type Report (which consist residents' name and physician diet ordered), dated May 20, 2024, indicated, Resident 12 is on large portions. A review of the Resident 12's Physician Diet Order, dated May 9, 2024, indicated, .Large portions . A review of Resident 12's Meal Tray Ticket (menu based on the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not implement and maintain infection control procedures when the licensed nurse did not disinfect a shared stethoscope between each resident use. This failure had the potential to spread infection that could risk the health and well - being of 2 of 37 medically compromised residents (Residents 138 and 181). Finding: On May 21, 2024, at 9:01 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) was observed using a stethoscope and checked Resident 181's blood pressure without cleaning the stethoscope in between residents. On May 21, 2024, at 9:37 a.m. an interview was conducted with LVN 1 regarding the process for cleaning a shared stethoscope between resident. LVN 1 stated I know I didn't clean it. LVN 1 added, It (stethoscope) should be cleaned each time before and after use. A review of Resident 181's admission Record, (summary of patient information), dated May 21, 2024, indicated Resdient 181 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment was provided for three of the six residents (Residents 2, 4 and 5) as evidenced by the following: 1. For Residents 4 and 5, intravenous (IV - given through the veins) medication was not administered in accordance with the physician order. This failure had the potential to result in infection not resolving and could lead to hospitalization; and 2. For Residents 2 and 4, wound treatment was not provided as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential to result in delayed wound healing for the resident's skin condition to achieve their highest practicable level of physical and mental well-being. Findings: On March 7, 2024, at 10:04 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint for quality-of-care issue. 1a. On March 7, 2024, a review of Resident 4's admission record, indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included osteomyelitis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to do a dressing change on a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC-is a thin flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm and used to give intravenous fluids and other drugs) as ordered by the physician, for one of six sample residents (Resident 4). This failure increased the potential for Resident 4 to acquire an infection to the area where the catheter was placed which can spread to the resident's blood and other parts of the body. Findings: On March 7, 2024, at 10:04 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint for quality-of-care issue. On March 7, 2024, a review of Resident 4's admission record, indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 4's diagnosis included osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone caused by infection, generally in legs, arm or spine) of right ankle and foot, Type 2 diabetes (condition in which body has trouble controlling blood sugar),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0620 — isolated
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for one (Resident 1) of three residents, the facility failed to admit Resident 1 to the facility when a bed was not made readily available for an arranged admission on [DATE]. The facility's failure to make a bed readily available for a pre-arranged admission resulted in a denial of Resident 1's entry and admission on [DATE]. Findings: On August 9, 2023, at 9:30 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate an issue regarding Admission, Transfer and Discharge Rights. On August 9, 2023, at 9:30 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator (ADM) were interviewed. The DON indicated that Resident 1was denied admission into the facility on July 20, 2023, when he showed up positive for COVID -19 infection on a spot testing conducted upon arrival to the facility. The DON indicated they do not have a bed available to quarantine (isolation precaution purposes) the resident to prevent spread of infection. DON was unable to provide for documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The food service department had no system for ambient food (food that can be safely stored at room temperature in a sealed container, for example, canned tuna fish) cooling down process; 2. Improper labeling for thawing meat; and 3. A tray of diced chicken was found in the walk-in refrigerator, and was passed the used-by-date and not discarded. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable population of 20 out of total census of 21 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During the kitchen initial tour on January 10, 2022, at 11:24 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Kitchen Supervisor/Cook (KS). The KS stated the temperature of the tuna salad was not monitored before storing it in the refrigerator. He added they did not record any temperature for the cooling down process of any ambient food that they made and there was no cooling log…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-01-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean environment for the residents and visitors when one garbage disposal bin located outside by the kitchen was overflowing and was not securely closed with the dumpster lid. This failure had the potential for an unsafe environment for the residents and visitors due to possible pest infestation and spread of diseases in the facility. Findings: During the kitchen initial tour observation on January 10, 2022, at 10:35 a.m., one dumpster located outside nearby facility kitchen was observed not securely closed by the lid, and the bags of trash were overflowing on top of the dumpster. A concurrent interview with the Food Service Director (FSD), she confirmed the dumpster was not securely closed with lid. The FSD stated the facility only had one dumpster for the trash and the trash pick up date was every Monday. She agreed it was not acceptable and the dumpster lid should be close tightly to prevent rodent infestation. During a follow up interview with the FSD on January 11, 2022, at 3:30 p.m., she stated the food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-01-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and rcord review, the facility failed to ensure range of motion (ROM) exercises were provided according to the physician's orders, for three of four residents reviewed for limited ROM (Residents 2, 8, and 12). This failure had the potential to result in a decline in the residents' ROM and could affect the residents' activities of daily living for Resident 2, 8, and 12. Findings: 1. On January 10, 2022, at 11:40 a.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 2. Resident 2 was observed lying in bed, alert, and conversant. In a concurrent interview with Resident 2, she stated she did not receive any restorative therapy since last week. On January 11, 2022, Resident 2's record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included generalized muscle weakness and intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke - bleeding into the brain tissue) with hemiplegia (weakness of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (paralysis of one side of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed during the lunch meal on January 10, 2022, when the menu item, zucchini, was substituted by the yellow squash without notifying the Food Service Director or facility Registered Dietitian (RD). This failure had potential to compromise residents' intake when the planned menu was not followed. There were 20 out of 21 residents received meals from the kitchen. Findings: During lunch meal service observation on January 11, 2022, at 11:30 a.m., a tray of cooked yellow squashes was observed on the trayline (a system of food preparation in which food trays move along an assembly line). A concurrent review of facility document, titled Menu-Daily Spreadsheet: Tuesday-Day 24, dated 2021, it indicated seasoned zucchini should be served. A concurrent interview with the [NAME] (Cook 2), he stated he used the yellow squashes to substitute the zucchinis because there were not enough zucchinis in the refrigerator. He stated he did not notify the Food Service Director (FSD) for the substitution. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control measures were implemented when multiple facility staff did not wear proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment - mask, gown, gloves, face shield or goggles) when surgical mask was placed on top of the N95 mask (a mask to filter airborne particles) while providing care to the residents inside the PUI Unit (Person Under Investigation - a resident suspected of having or exposed to COVID-19 [coronavirus-an illness caused by a virus that can spread from person to person]). This failures had the potential to result in the transmission of infection to an already vulnerable population of residents in the facility. Findings: On January 10, 2022, at 12:45 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1. CNA 1 was observed to place a surgical mask over the N95 respirator mask before entering room [ROOM NUMBER] (PUI unit). CNA 1 was observed to assist Resident 7 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure information regarding formulating an Advance Directive (AD - written instruction related to the provision of health care when the resident is no longer able to make decisions) was provided to the resident, for one of nine residents reviewed for AD (Resident 20). This failure had the potential for Resident 20, to not be able to exercise their rights to formulate an Advance Directive. Findings: On January 11, 2022, Resident 20's record was reviewed. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The History and Physical, dated September 16, 2021, indicated Resident 20 was mentally capable of understanding. There was no documented evidence the facility provided information to Resident 20 regarding the right to formulate an advance directive since admission on [DATE]. On January 12, 2022, at 2:24 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. The DON stated the Advance Directive should be offered to Resident 20 upon admission and during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,046 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $20,046 — penalty dated 2024-05-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FREEDOM GROUP-CALIFORNIA LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST18%since 12/06/1986
HEMET RETIREMENT PROPERTIES WEST, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 12/06/1986
NELSON EDWARD MURPHY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/06/1986
R.J. WADE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, LLPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 12/06/1986
ROSKAMP 2010 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST23%since 12/06/1986
STRINGER FAMILY PARTNERSHIPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST12%since 12/06/1986
FRANCESE, CELIAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 03/17/2026
MANGIARACINA, EMILYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
ROSKAMP, CHERYLIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL6%since 12/06/1986
ROSKAMP, STEVENIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2022
DEBBAN, SUSANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 12/06/1986
KUBICKA, CHARLESIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/06/1986
MURPHY, TIMOTHYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST7%since 12/06/1986
ROSKAMP, ROBERTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST18%since 12/06/1986
STRINGER, THOMASIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST17%since 12/06/1986
WADE, RICHARDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 12/06/1986
VERGARA, DANAIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/15/2019
FREEDOM MANAGEMENT CO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2025
GHASB, ELIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2026
SCHULTZ, CALEBIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2025
DICKMAN WESTON GROUPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$321K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 21%Medicare 5%Other / private 73%

This home reported $321K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$735per resident / day
operating cost
$22,330per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$274per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555463. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next