Sierra Vista
3455 East Highland Ave, Highland, CA 92346 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 116 certified beds · (909) 862-6454 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 0.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.1% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 0.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.3% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 0.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 115.8 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.51 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity and respect when a Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) verbally abused one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by calling Resident 1 a derogatory term and inappropriately discussed details of Resident 1's personal sex life with fellow staff members. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling humiliated, dehumanized, embarrassed and to experience emotional distress.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a serious mental disorder characterized by distortions in thinking, perception, emotions, sense of self and behavior), history of traumatic brain injury (past traumatic brain injury) , and congestive heart failure (a condition in which the heart cannot pump blood effectively enough to meet the body's needs).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. The sink in the cook area which food service workers use to get tap water for residents, did not have an air gap (a vertical space between the end of a pipe and the top of a nearby sink that prevents the backflow of contaminated water). 2. The storage shelves in the walk-in refrigerator had a fuzzy white material and grime build-up. 3. Dust was found in several areas in the kitchen and equipment. 4. Chipped off/peeling paint found in janitor room and dry storage room. 5. Two frying pans were found with part of their black interior coating scraped off. 6. Two plastic scraping spatulas were found to have damage on their tips. 7. Five discrete brown dots/ spots grime were observed spread out on the ceiling above the holding cabinet. 8. The ice machine was found to have black substance inside the ice storage bin. 9. The microwave in the break room was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly when three dumpsters on the side of facility outside of the hallway that leads to the facility's kitchen were filled beyond the brim with trash, and the lids of all three dumpsters were not closed properly. This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents and comprise the health and safety of 116 residents who reside in the facility.Findings: During an observation on February 23, 2026, at 7:55 AM, on the side of the facility outside of the hallway that leads to the facility kitchen, all three dumpsters were filled above the brim with trash bags and the lids of the dumpsters were unable to fully close. During a concurrent observation and interview on February 23, 2026, at 8:38 AM with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) outside by the dumpsters, CDM advised the state of the dumpsters is Horrible. CDM advised the lids are supposed to be able to close (and if they don't) they bring rodents and flies. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to respond to and act upon the grievances and recommendations of the Resident Council (a group of residents that acts as a formal body to improve quality of life, discuss concerns, and make recommendations to facility's administrator to improve the quality of daily living and care in the facility) regarding dietary services for seven sampled residents (Residents 12, 34, 45, 55, 60, 88, and 113) when the Resident Council requested to increase the frequency of snacks from once daily to three times daily and provide a greater variety of snacks, including more nutritious options, to address resident hunger; however, the facility failed to provide a written response or implement these requested changes. This failure had the potential to cause unmet nutritional needs, increased feelings of hunger and discomfort, decreased quality of life, and diminished the residents' dignity by not addressing resident voiced concerns regarding dietary services.Findings: A combined Resident Council meeting (separate Resident Council meetings were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' privacy and confidentiality by failing to secure personal information from public view for 45 sampled residents (Residents 1 to 45) when a whiteboard containing the full names and room numbers of all residents on Unit 1 was posted in a back room of the nursing station but remained clearly visible to unauthorized individuals and other residents walking in the common hallway. This failure had the potential to cause psychosocial harm by compromising the residents' dignity and their right to exercise control over their personal environment, creating an institutionalized atmosphere that devalues resident individuality and can lead to feelings of embarrassment, vulnerability, and a loss of self-worth.Findings: During an observation and interview on Unit 1 at Nursing Station 1, conducted with a Registered Nurse (RN 1) and the Director of Nursing (DON) on February 25, 2026, from 8:19 AM to 9:23 AM, a door with a nameplate indicating Chart Room was propped open. When walking through the Chart Room,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide comprehensive pharmaceutical services by failing to ensure a medication error-free system and by lacking proper accountability, reconciliation, and witness documentation for the disposal of controlled substances, for 71 residents on Unit 2 (Residents 1 to 71) when:1. Resident 4 was administered two times the dose (400 mg-milligrams, a unit of measurement) of clozapine (an atypical antipsychotic medication used to treat schizoaffective disorder-a chronic mental health condition that is essentially a combination of two different types of illnesses: schizophrenia (which affects how a person perceives reality) and a mood disorder (which affects how a person feels), instead of the physician-ordered 200 mg dose. This failure had the potential to cause serious adverse outcomes, including severe respiratory depression, seizures, or significant hypotension, due to the administration of double the prescribed amount of a high-risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in an organized and safe manner for 45 sampled residents (Residents 1 to 45) when the Unit 1 medication storage room contained injectables, oral over-the-counter medications, liquid medications, tablets, sublingual medications, rectally applied medications, breathing treatments, eye drops and test kits that were intermingled and disorganized. This failure had the potential to cause significant medication errors, as the intermingling of products with different routes of administration increases the risk of nurses selecting and administering the wrong medication to a resident.Findings: During a medication storage observation and interview on Unit 1 at Nursing Station 1, conducted with a Registered Nurse (RN 1) and the Director of Nursing (DON) on February 25, 2026, from 8:19 AM to 9:23 AM, there were three cabinets in the medication room where medications were stored. On the shelves of each cabinet, medications were stored haphazardly; intermingled together on each shelf were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that snacks provided to residents (Residents 1 through 35) met their specific clinical and therapeutic needs for 35 residents receiving controlled carbohydrate diets (a consistent, set amount of carbohydrates at each meal and snack to stabilize blood sugar levels) when the facility failed to follow physician-ordered controlled carbohydrate diets by providing a uniform bedtime snack to the entire resident population without offering therapeutic alternatives. This failure had the potential to cause significant fluctuations in blood sugar levels, specifically acute hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) from excessive carbohydrate intake or nighttime hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) if the provided snack did not meet the resident's specific stabilization needs.Findings: A review of the facility provided Diet Type Report, dated February 23, 2026, indicated Residents 1 to 35 had a current physician's order for a controlled carbohydrate diet.A review of a sign posted to a window outside the Dietary Supervisor's office indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food services employees safely and effectively carried out the functions of food and nutrition services when:1. Cooks did not follow standard of practice Cleaning and sanitizing food contact surfaces by using three separate steps (wash, rinse and sanitize) to clean and sanitize work surfaces.2. Multiple food services employees did not follow manufacturer's guideline time length dipping the test strip into sanitizer (sanitizing solution used for sanitizing food contact surfaces) for testing the concentration of the sanitizer.3. Multiple food services employees did not know the concentration range of sanitizer (a solution used to reduce the number of germs on food contact surfaces to acceptable levels).4. Diet Aide 1 did not know the Dish machine sanitizing concentration.5. [NAME] 2 did not know how to calibrate thermometer. 6. [NAME] 2 unable to demonstrate cooling process for Tuna Salad. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Controlled Carbohydrate Diet (a meal plan for diabetic residents) lunch dessert was provided for 34 of 34 sampled residents who are on a Controlled Carbohydrate Diet (CC) when the 34 sampled residents received a regular dessert for lunch on February 23, 2026. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' nutritional status and further compromising residents' medical status.Findings: During an observation on February 23, 2026, at 11:04 AM in the kitchen, Dietary Aide 3 (DA 3) was observed preparing dessert for the lunch service for the residents. DA 3 used a spatula to slice two of two sheet pans of cake into even portions. DA 3 then applied frosting to all slices of cake on both sheet pans and used a spatula to separate each cake slice portion and distribute them onto dessert plates. No additional or differing size chocolate cakes were prepared for lunch. During an observation on February 23, 2026, at 12:01 PM in the dining room, all residents, including residents who were on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and orderly medication storage room for 45 residents (Residents 1 through 45) when:1. A tub containing various used personal care products-some labeled with resident names and others unlabeled-was stored in a cabinet alongside resident medications.2. A bag of discontinued prescription topical medications awaiting disposal was stored on the bottom shelf of a medication cabinet next to discarded items, disinfectant spray, and trash. This failure had the potential to cause cross-contamination and the transmission of infectious agents for 45 residents who reside in Unit 1 of the facility.Findings: 1. During a medication storage observation and interview on Unit 1 at Nursing Station 1, conducted with a Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) and the Director of Nursing (DON) on February 25, 2026, from 8:19 AM to 9:23 AM, there were three cabinets in the medication room where medications were stored. In the third cabinet on the third shelf, a tub of personal care products was stored (10 different colognes,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper maintenance of essential equipment when: 1. The handwashing sink did not consistently maintained water temperatures in accordance with the standard of practice. This failure had the potential for inadequate water temperature which may result in ineffective handwashing putting residents at risk for food borne illness. 2. The Veggie reach-in freezer had ice condensation buildup. This failure had the potential to cause poor quality of food served to a population of 116 out of 116 sample residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a review of FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code 2025, Section 5-202.12., the FDA Food Code indicated, A handwashing sink shall be equipped to provide water at a temperature of at least 85 degrees Fahrenheit ( F - a unit of measurement) through a mixing valve or combination faucet. An inadequate flow or temperature of water may lead to poor handwashing practices by food employees. A mixing valve or combination faucet is needed to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two resident's communal shower rooms (blue and green shower rooms) located on unit 1 were maintained in good repair and in a safe and sanitary condition, when the blue and green shower rooms were both observed to have cracked and stained tile surfaces. This failure had the potential to expose all 45 residents on unit 1 who utilize these shared showers to potential harm, contamination and transmission of healthcare-associated infections.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on February 25, 2026, at 9:01 AM with Infection Preventionist (IP), in the green and blue shower rooms, it was observed multiple cracked and stained tiles. The IP stated, I see there are multiple cracked and stained tiles within both shower rooms. The IP further stated, shower surfaces should be intact and cleanable to prevent infection control issues.During a concurrent observation and interview on February 25, 2026, at 9:42 AM with Maintenance Supervisor (MS), in the green and blue shower rooms, it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans (an individualized plan based on assessment that identifies needs, sets goals, and outlines interventions for the medical care of a resident) for two of 35 sampled residents (Resident 14 and 34) when:1. For Resident 14, who had a documented history of falls, the facility did not create a fall risk care plan to address fall risk factors, individualized interventions, and preventive strategies.2. For Resident 34, who was identified as a smoker, the facility did not create a care plan that addressed smoking supervision, safety precautions, and risk mitigation. These failures had the potential to place Residents 14 and 34 at risk for injury, burns, fire hazards, and recurrent falls with injury.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 14's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record, indicated, Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed physician's orders for one of five sampled residents (Resident 19) investigated for nutrition, when the facility did not have documented weights of Resident 19 in the frequency as ordered by the physician. This failure resulted in Resident 19 not being monitored as ordered by the physician for changes in weight and placed the resident at risk for undetected significant weight loss or gain.Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record (contains medical and demographic information), the admission Record, indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by intense paranoia, delusions, and auditory hallucinations), and vitamin D deficiency.During an interview on February 24, 2026, at 8:45 AM, with Resident 19, Resident 19 stated he had lost 60 pounds since he was admitted to the facility.During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's rights to be free from physical restraint (a manual method, physical or mechanical device or material that restricts the resident's freedom of movement or normal access to his/her body), for one of one resident (Resident 1), were followed when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) placed his arm over Resident 1's shoulders, restricting his movement, on June 8, 2025. This failure had the potential for Resident 1to be at risk for physical and psychological harm (the unpleasant emotional or psychological symptoms that individuals experience when they feel overwhelmed, impacting their quality of life). Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [NAME] 3, 2025, with diagnoses which included schizophrenia unspecified (a chronic mental illness characterized by significant disturbances in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. A toaster was stored in the dry storage, and it had an accumulation of food residue. 2. On the floor under the industrial mixer, there was black grime, food crumbs, and paint splashes. 3. The shelf under the cook's preparation area that was storing clean pans had crusted food and debris. 4. In the Unit 2 kitchen area where food is served to the residents, the refrigerator door handle had crusted food and smudges. Under the steam table, there was a storage compartment that had black grime and food debris. These failures had the potential to result in accumulating pathogenic microorganisms (germs or infectious agents that can cause disease) and to attract insects or rodents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on December 9, 2024, at 8:10 AM, in the kitchen's dry storage room, an unused toaster with crusted debris and crumbs was observed on a shelf rack. The Dietary Supervisor (DS) stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) for two of 71 residents (Resident 22 and 85) when: 1. For Resident 22, 11 tablets of Clozapine (medication used to treat severely ill patients with serious mental illness that have difficulty distinguishing what is real and what is not) 50 mg (milligrams- unit of measurement) were found with an expiration date of August 9, 2024 (expired 124 days) and were available for resident use when stored in Unit 2's medication cart (Cart 2). 2. For Resident 85, five tablets of Vitamin B6 (a vitamin used to treat movement disorder) 100 mg were found with an expiration date of December 3, 2024 (expired 8 days) and were available for resident use when stored in Unit 2's medication cart (Cart 1). These failures had the potential for the medications to lose their potency over time, making them less effective and to adversely affect the health and safety of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure secure storage of medications when one of two medication rooms (Unit 2's medication room) and two of three medication carts (Medication Cart 1 and 2 in Unit 2's medication room - carts used by licensed nurses and Psych technicians [PT] to hold medications for all residents) were found unlocked and unattended by a licensed nurse and PT. This failure had the potential for medications to be accessed and dispersed by an unauthorized person, in a vulnerable population of 71 residents. Findings: During an observation on December 10, 2024, at 4:40 PM, PT 1 was inside Unit 2's medication room, using medication cart 1 and 2. Psych Tech left the nurses station and went across the hall to a locked closet to assist a resident. PT 1 left Unit 2's medication room, medication cart 1, and medication cart 2 unlocked and unattended. During a concurrent observation and interview on December 10, 2024, at 4:45 PM, with PT 1, PT 1 walked towards the opened Unit 2's medication room door and went inside. When PT 1 was asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to prepare food in a form designed to meet the need of one resident (Resident 28) when Resident 28's lunch on Monday, December 9, 2024, had visible chunks of food. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 28 choking during the meal. Findings: During an observation on December 9, 2024, at 12:24 AM, in Unit 2's dining room, Resident 28's tray consisted of chicken potpie and carrots with notable lumps present. Resident 28's diet ticket stated dysphagia puree. (food texture that is smooth). During an interview on December 10, 2024, at 11:40 AM with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the kitchen, the DS stated that Resident 28's diet order is dysphagia puree. The DS further stated the meal should have had a smooth texture with no lumps. During an interview on December 11, 2024, at 8:15 AM with the Registered Dietician, the RD stated that Resident 28's diet order is dysphagia puree and that the order should have been followed. The RD further stated the expectation for a dysphagia puree diet is to have no lumps…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition when the refrigerator had corrosion on the walls and expanding foam visible from behind the refrigerator wall. This failure had the potential to result in unsafe temperature control for safety foods and the accumulation of bacterial growth (germs that can cause illness). Findings: During an observation on December 9, 2024, at 8:18 AM, in the kitchen, corrosion on the bottom walls of the walk-in refrigerator was observed. There was a yellow expanding foam visible from behind the posterior refrigerator wall. The Dietary Supervisor (DS) stated the foam was from the previous maintenance repair, and it should not have been visible. The DS further stated there should not be corrosion on the walls. During an interview on December 11, 2024, at 8:15 AM, with the Registered Dietician (RD), the RD stated the fridge should not have had corrosion on the walls and visible expanding foam from repair. During a concurrent interview and record review on December 11, 2024, at 10:20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish) for one resident (Resident 1), when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) threw water on Resident 1's face and kicked his right leg. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for physical and psychological harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), it indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia (a mental disorder that affects a person's thoughts, feelings, and behavior). A review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set, and assessment tool), dated November 14, 2024, indicated Resident 1 had cognitive function with a score of 15/15 on the BIMS assessment (Brief Interview for Mental Status) which indicated Resident 1 is likely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) with significant weight loss (10% of his body weigh) was weighed weekly which put Residents 1's nutritional status at risk. This failure resulted in Resident 1's significant weight loss going unmonitored which put this resident at risk for medical complications related to further weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which includes: schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect your thoughts, mood, and behavior), hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), and Crohn's disease (inflammation of the bowels). During a review of Resident 1's Monthly Weights and Vitals Summary Record indicated the following: 1. January 9, 2023, indicated a weight of 168 pounds (unit of measure, lbs.), 2. April 3, 2023, indicated a weight of 166 lbs., 3.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. Three plastic pitchers and three lids were stored wet. It was placed on a rack where clean and dried cookware and serviceware (containers, bowls, plates, trays, cups, utensils) were stored. 2. An unlabeled large plastic container with red liquid was found inside the fridge. 3. The kitchen floors were observed with build-up of dirt, sticky residue, and crumbs. Behind the stove, the floors had buildup of crumbs and one food thermometer. 4. The metal shelf, above the stove, had grease build-up. 5. There was no thermometer inside the Resident Refrigerator, and the Resident Refrigerator Temperature Log was empty. These failures had the potential to lead to growth of microorganisms (bacteria, virus, fungi) and foodborne illness for 116 highly susceptible residents who receives facility prepared meals. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), on March 7, 2023, at 8:10 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights were respected for two of five residents (Residents 59 and 18) reviewed for unnecessary medications (any medications which are in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indications for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued) when: 1. For Resident 18, the informed consent (document signed by resident or representative to give permission for a proposed psychotropic medication [medications that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior] and possible risks and benefits expected) were not obtained for Resident 18's order of Ativan (anti-anxiety medication), Temazepam (hypnotic medication- induce sleep) and Trazodone (anti-depressant medication). 2. For Resident 59, the informed consent was not obtained for Resident 59's order of Invega (anti-psychotic medication).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the rights of one resident (Resident 43) reviewed for physical restraints (any manual method, physical or mechanical device/equipment or material that limits a resident's freedom of movement and cannot be removed by the resident in the same manner as it was applied by staff) when Resident 43's physician's order for restraint was not discontinued in accordance with the facility's policy. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 43 to be restraint unnecessarily and without a new physician's order. Findings: During an observation on March 7, 2023, at 9:51 AM, Resident 43 was lying in bed, facing right side. Resident 43 refused to be interviewed. During a review of Resident 43's clinical record, the admission Record (contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (mental disorder in which people interpret reality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change of Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS- a computerized assessment instrument) was completed for one of four residents (Resident 8) reviewed for nutrition after severe weight loss and decline in personal hygiene to reflect current resident's status, care, and services was identified . This failure had the potential to delay identification and implementation of Resident 8's care and support needs, which could result on his care plan not being updated and revised to reflect his current status. Findings: A review of Resident 8's admission Record (a document that contains demographic and clinical data), indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (mental illness that can affect your thoughts, mood, and behavior) and hypertension (blood pressure that is higher than normal). During a concurrent interview and record review, on March 10, 2023, at 9:21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- a computerized assessment instrument) Assessments were completed accurately to reflect the resident's status, care, and services for one of seven residents (Resident 56) reviewed for skin conditions. This failure had the potential to cause inaccuracy in identifying Resident 56's care and support needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 56's admission Record (a document that contains demographic and clinical data), it indicated Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a severe long-term mental health condition) and atopic dermatitis (areas of skin to become itchy, dry, cracked, sore and red). A concurrent interview and review of Resident 56's clinical record was conducted with the Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDS Nurse) and the Director of Nursing (DON) on March 10, 2023, at 8:55 AM. The MDS Nurse and the DON reviewed Resident 56's Body Check assessment, conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the post fall protocol was implemented in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure for one of four residents (Resident 18) reviewed for falls, when Resident 18's care plans (action plan that outline the type of care and treatment a resident need) was not updated, and the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a group of healthcare professionals from different disciplines working towards a common goal for a resident) did not conduct a review after Resident 18 had a fall. This failure have the potential for Resident 18 to be at risk of further falls which could increase Resident 18's risk of injuries. Findings: During an observation, on March 7, 2023, at 9:23 AM, outside of Resident 18's room, Resident 18 was walking on the hallway, wearing street clothes, talking to a staff. During a review of Resident 18's admission Record (clinical record with demographic information), it indicated, Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed safe infection control practices when: 1. A Dietary Aide did not perform hand hygiene before serving lunch on March 7, 2023. 2. The Dietary Supervisor (DS) was wearing acrylic nails, longer than the tip of the fingers, while breakfast on March 8, 2023. 3. Resident 23's used towels and linens, with live lice crawling, were not placed in bags. These failures had the potential to result in cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful bacteria) causing a preventable infection to 116 highly vulnerable residents whose health conditions are already compromised. Findings: 1. During an observation, in Wing 2's dining room, on March 7, 2023, at 12:43 PM, Dietary Aide (DA 1) entered the dining area and applied a pair of gloves. DA 1 did not wash his hands on the sink, which was located at the left side of the steam table (used to keep the food hot). DA 1 proceeded to serve food from the food pans (rectangular pans used for food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was being implemented when: 1. There was one live cockroach crawling out from the janitor's closet, close to the Wing 1 dining room. 2. There was one live cockroach found in wing 2 Men's shower room. Findings: 1. During an observation, on March 9, 2023, at 2:27 PM, near the Wing 1 dining room, a cockroach came out underneath the Janitor's closet, and crawled towards the Wing 1 dining room. Resident 41 stepped on the roach before it could reach the dining room. During a subsequent observation, on March 9, 2023, at 2:30 PM, Resident 41 stepped on the cockroach twice while he was in line waiting for an activity. During a concurrent observation and interview, with the Activity Director (AD), on March 9, 2023, at 2:33 PM, the AD verified the cockroach was on the floor, near the Wing 1 dining room. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview, with the Pest Control Technician (PCT), March 10, 2023, at 10:45 AM, in the Wing 2 Men's shower room, there was a live cockroach…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in CA
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 05A027. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.