Hazel Hawkins Memorial Hospital D/P SNF
911 Sunset Drive, Hollister, CA 95023 · Government - Hospital district · 119 certified beds · (831) 637-5711 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (13% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (28) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.9% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 19.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.3% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.9% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.81 | 2.25 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.50 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 209 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 112 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.5%CMS range 49.6–60.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 7.0–12.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.3–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 90.0 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.31 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.10 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.66 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.58 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.89 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 13% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement individualized, resident-centered care plans for 24 of 36 residents (Residents 84, 22, 28, 97, 98, 9, 60, 2, 5, 10, 50, 54, 58, 83, 91, 80, 34, 33, 41, 75, 64, 20, 66, and 6) who used bed rails or side rails (adjustable rigid bars attached to the side of a bed).These failures had the potential of unmet care needs for Residents 84, 22, 28, 97, 98, 9, 60, 2, 5, 10, 50, 54, 58, 83, 91, 80, 34, 33, 41, 75, 64, 20, 66, and 6's use of bed rails. Findings: 1. During an observation on 9/15/2025 at 10:42 a.m., inside Resident 84's room, Resident 84 was on bed with two bed rails installed and in an upright position. During a concurrent observation and interview with registered nurse A (RN A) on 9/17/2025 at 1:20 p.m., inside Resident 84's room, Resident 84's bed had two upper bed rails in an upright position. RN A confirmed the above observation and stated Resident 84 used the upper bed rails to assist her with mobility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a manner which conserved flavor and nutritive value when: 1. Lunch was ready at 9:30 a.m. and was held at hot temperature for hours prior to meal service.2. The correct texture and recipe were not followed for pureed diet. These deficient practices had the potential to result in loss of nutrients and to decrease the food intake of residents and could negatively impact their nutritional status. Findings: 1.During a kitchen observation of the North Side on 9/17/25 at 9:27 a.m. with Dietary Supervisor (DS) and Dietary [NAME] (DC), DC stated she finished preparing pureed food at 9:10 a.m. DC also stated the main lunch dish, Beef Stroganoff, was cooked from scratch and was ready by 9:15 a.m. DS stated, Lunch is usually prepared early. DC showed the metal containers covered in aluminum foil containing food for lunch stored in an oven. DC opened two metal containers and showed white pureed food and beef stroganoff. DC stated the white pureed food was cauliflower. DS stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented when:1. Registered nurse A (RN A) did not remove dirty gloves, perform hand hygiene (the act of cleaning hands with soap and water or an alcohol-based hand sanitizer to remove germs and prevent the spread of infections) and don (put on) a new pair of gloves before doing Resident 65's finger stick test (method of drawing drops of blood, most commonly used by people with high blood sugar to check their levels), and RN A did not perform hand hygiene after she picked the glove that fell on the floor and before putting on clean gloves prior to medication preparation;2. Registered nurse E (RN E) did not perform hand hygiene prior to medication administration;3. Certified nursing assistant C (CNA C) and licensed vocational nurse D (LVN D) did not perform hand hygiene in between assisting and feeding residents; and,4. Certified nursing assistant F (CNA F) did not change dirty gloves after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 34) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) when the physician did not document the reason a gradual dose reduction (GDR, stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if conditions can be managed by a lower dose or if the medication can be discontinued altogether) was contraindicated. This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary or prolonged use of the psychotropic medication, which could increase the resident's risk of experiencing side effects (undesirable effects from the medication).Findings:Review of Resident 34's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and atrial fibrillation (AFib, an irregular heart rhythm).Review of Resident 34's physician orders indicated she had orders for Seroquel 25 milligrams (mg, unit of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 34) when Resident 34's MDS assessment did not reflect the use of antipsychotic medication (used to treat psychosis and other mental health disorders). This failure resulted in an inaccurate MDS assessment, which had the potential to affect the resident's care.Findings:Review of Resident 34's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and atrial fibrillation (AFib, an irregular heart rhythm).Review of Resident 34's physician orders indicated she had orders for Seroquel 25 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) two times a day for agitation, delusion, and paranoia, dated 9/13/25. Review of Resident 34's previous physician orders indicated she had orders for Seroquel starting in 11/2024.Review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 7/24/25 indicated the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan to include instructions on the care of bed rails or side rails (adjustable rigid bars attached to the side of a bed) use for one (Resident 99) of 36 residents (residents with bed rails or side rails). This failure resulted in the installation and use of Resident 99's bed rails without a plan of care. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 99's serious injury.Findings:Review of Resident 99's clinical record titled, admission Record, dated 9/18/2025, indicated Resident 99 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-displaced fracture (broken bone) of lesser trochanter of left femur (a small, cone-shaped bony bump on the inside, back part of the upper thigh bone [femur], near the neck of the bone joins the shaft), epilepsy (a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent, unprovoked seizures), and hyponatremia (a condition where the sodium level in the blood is too…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper use of side or bed rails (adjustable rigid bars attached to the side of a bed) for four (Residents 97, 99, 100, and 3) of 36 residents (residents who used bed or side rails) when:1.The physician's orders and informed consents (a process in which patients are given important information, including possible risks and benefits, about a medical procedure or treatment) were not obtained prior to use of bed or side rails for Resident 97 and Resident 99; and,2.Resident 100 and Resident 3 used side rails without a clinically appropriate indication.These failures had the potential to place Residents 97, 99, 100, and 3 at risk of entrapment and serious injury. Findings: 1a. During an observation on 9/15/2025 at 10:58 a.m., inside Resident 97's room, Resident 97 was in bed with four bed rails installed and the two upper bed rails were in an upright position. During a review of Resident 97's clinical records, there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate accountability of medications and controlled substance (drug or other substance that can be easily abused and are under strict government control) for three of 13 randomly selected residents (Residents 56, 78 and 34) when: 1. Resident 56's Azithromycin (used to treat certain bacterial infections in many different parts of the body) antibiotic was not accounted for and reconciled accurately;2. Resident 78's Sulfamethoxazole -Trimethoprim (Cotrimazole, an antibiotic medication used to treat certain infections that are caused by bacteria) was not accounted for and reconciled accurately; and3. Resident 34's controlled medication was signed out of the Controlled Drug Administration Record (CDAR, an inventory or count sheet) without recording the time the medication was given and did not document in the medication administration record (MAR) as administered. These failures resulted in inaccurate accountability of medications and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacist's medication regimen review (MRR) recommendations for one of 22 residents (Resident 34) were followed-up and acted upon. This failure had the potential for the resident to suffer unnecessary adverse side effects that could negatively impact her physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings:Review of Resident 34's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities) and atrial fibrillation (AFib, an irregular heart rhythm).Review of Resident 34's physician orders indicated she had orders for gabapentin (medication used to prevent seizures or nerve pain) 100 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) in the morning and gabapentin 200 mg at bedtime for neuropathic pain, dated 3/2/25.Review of Resident 34's Consultation Report, dated 5/21/25 indicated the pharmacist recommended, Please evaluate these medications [Loratadine, Sertraline, Quetiapine, Gabapentin] as possibly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-19 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and document review, the facility failed to review and/or revise their policy and procedure in compliance with federal regulations and with accepted professional standards when the facility did not revise or update their side rail policy and procedure annually. This failure had the potential to compromise residents' health and safety.Findings:Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Side Rail, indicated the last review and revision was 3/2018.During a concurrent interview with the director of staff development (DSD) and document review on 9/18/2025 at 10:09 a.m., the DSD reviewed the Side Rail policy and procedure and confirmed the last time it was reviewed was in 2018. The DSD stated they reviewed their policy and procedures yearly.During a concurrent interview with the interim director of nursing (IDON) and document review on 9/19/2025 at 1:38 p.m., the IDON reviewed the Side Rail policy and procedure and confirmed it was revised in 2018. IDON stated they have a Patient Care Policy Committee, and they meet annually to review or revise their policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 18 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to pain management for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 did not receive the right dosage of oxycodone (a controlled drug used to treat moderate to severe pain) to manage severe pain to right hip. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 1's well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record titled, admission Record, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced subtrochanteric fracture of right femur (a severe injury to the thigh bone where the fractured ends is out of alignment), aftercare following joint replacement surgery (a procedure in which a surgeon removes a damaged joint and replaces it with new, artificial part), polyneuropathy (multiple nerve damage), presence of right artificial hip, and need assistance with personal care. Review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0700 — widespreadTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an observation on 3/11/24 at 11:27 AM, Resident 69 was observed in bed, with the two upper siderails in the raised position. Review of Resident 69's face sheet indicated Resident 69 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 69's physician order, dated 4/19/23, indicated Resident 69 had an order for bilateral (both sides) upper side rails to be up when in bed for bed mobility. A review of Resident 69's clinical records indicated no documentation that the facility attempted alternatives, explained risks and benefits, obtained informed consent for use of side rails or assessed for risk of entrapment prior to using the bedside rails upon admission to facility. During an observation on 3/11/24 at 10:20 AM, Resident 16 was seen lying in bed, with the two upper siderails and two lower siderails in the raised position. Review of Resident 16's face sheet indicated they were admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 16's physician order, dated 7/4/23, indicated Resident 16 had an order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement, comprehensive, resident-centered, care plans for five out of twenty sampled residents, (Residents 51, 42, 47, 43 and 82), when the activity care plans of Residents 51, 42, 47, 43 and 82, were not comprehensive and resident-centered. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not receiving the interventions necessary to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 51's face sheet (a document that gives resident's information at a quick glance) indicated, Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), unspecified chronic kidney disease (longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure) and essential primary hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure that's not the result of a medical condition). During an observation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sanitary practices of both kitchens and their foods were stored under sanitary conditions when: 1. A wilted head of lettuce, green onion, and cut salad were stored in a refrigerator; 2. No air gap (space between the top of the drain overflow and the discharge pipe or hose to prevent back flow of contaminated water) for a dishwasher, ice machine, 3-way sink (commercial and manual dishwashing sink), and food preparation sink in kitchen; 3. The egg salad stored in a refrigerator was measured at 44.5 degrees Fahrenheit (a unit of measurement of temperature) These failures had the potential to result in food borne illnesses among residents in the facility. Findings: 1.During an initial kitchen 1 observation and interview with facility's certified dietary manager L (CDM L) on 3/11/24 at 10:00 a.m., a wilted, brown colored head of lettuce, yellow and black colored wilted bunch of green onion leaves, and wilted cut salad in a plastic bag were in a refrigerator in kitchen 1. CDM L acknowledged these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer 2 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 6 and 35) to the appropriate agency for a level two PASRR (pre-admission screening and resident review, a federal requirement to help ensure individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) evaluation when 1.Resident 6's PASRR Level one was positive, and 2.Resident 35 was diagnosed with schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly) and psychosis (a severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality) not due to a substance or known physiological condition after admission. This failure had the potential to put the residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and services. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 6's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including psychotic disorder (a collection of symptoms that affect the mind,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) from possibly getting worse for one out of six residents (Resident 238) investigated with pressure ulcer, when staff did not document whether they turned and repositioned Resident 238 every two hours, from 6/23/23 to 6/27/23. This failure resulted in the lack of documentation for whether Resident 238 was turned and repositioned. Findings: Review of Resident 238's face sheet (a document that gives resident's information at a quick glance) indicated, Resident 238 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture (a complete or partial break in a bone) of unspecified part of neck of right femur (thigh bone), subsequent encounter for closed fracture (bone is broken but the skin is intact) with routine healing, unspecified heart failure (a chronic condition in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for oxygen (a component of air essential to living organisms) rate administration for 1 of 3 sampled resident (Resident 48). This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 48's health and well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 48's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 48 readmitted to facility on 3/6/2023. Review of Resident's admission diagnoses including systemic inflammatory response syndrome (a condition in which there is inflammation [a normal part of the body's response to injury or infection] throughout the whole body), anemia (a condition in which the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells to provide oxygen to body tissues), and chronic kidney disease (a gradual loss of kidney function over the time). Review of Resident 148's physician orders ,dated 3/7/2024, indicated, Oxygen at 2 LPM (LPM: liters per minute, oxygen measured in liters per minute) via nasal cannula (NC, a medical device to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a medication error rate of 5.88% when two medication errors occurred out of 34 opportunities during the medication administration for two of 12 residents (Residents 30 and 31). Both residents did not receive their medications as ordered. The failures resulted in medications not given according to the physician's orders and had the potential for them not receiving the full therapeutic effects of the medications. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation with Registered Nurse (RN) A on 3/11/24 at 11:49 a.m., she was observed giving two medications to Resident 30 including a bottle of Systane Lubricant Eye drops. At the bedside, RN A instilled one drop of Systane eye solution into each of the resident's eyes. A review of Resident 30's physician's order, dated 10/9/22, indicated for Refresh Tears Solution (Carboxymethylcelulose Sodium) [active ingredient, a type of lubricant], to instill 1 drop in both eyes three times daily for dry eyes. During a concurrent interview and record review with RN A on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled and stored appropriately when insulin (medication to lower blood sugar) pens were not labeled with an expiration date when stored at room temperature; expired medications were identified in two of two medication carts, and in two of two medication rooms; and the temperature was not being monitored and maintained twice daily for two out of two medication refrigerators as per facility policy and procedures (P&P). This failure had the potential for the insulin to be administered past the 28-day expiration date; expired medications given to the residents; and loss of drug potency due to unmonitored temperatures. Findings: 1. During a visit to the Northside Medication Room with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) D on 3/11/24 at 9:21 a.m., the medication refrigerator was identified. A quick review of the contents inside reflected it contained several refrigerated medications including two boxes of flu vaccine and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to accommodate food dislikes for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 58). This failure had the potential for decreased meal intake and negative effects on health and well-being for Resident 58. Findings: During lunch observation in the facility's south building's dining room on 3/11/2024 at 12:23 p.m., cut pieces of carrots along with other food items were on Resident 58'slunch plate. Review of Resident 58's lunch tray card, dated 3/11/2024, indicated under dislikes No: Carrots, Cauliflower. Review of facility's lunch menu for 3/11/2024 indicated carrots lyonnaise along with other food items. During a concurrent interview, and record review of Resident 58's lunch tray card with certified nursing assistant K (CNA K), on 3/11/2024 at 12:30 p.m., CNA K acknowledged carrots under dislikes for Resident 58. CNA K stated dietary staff should not have provided carrots to Resident 58 as indicated under food dislikes for Resident 58. During an interview with facility's certified dietary manger L (CDM L)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control practice to prevent the spread of infection when: 1. A nasal cannula (NC: a medical device to provide supplemental oxygen to residents) tubing was on the floor, and dated 3/3; 2. A Foley catheter (F/C: a semi-flexible plastic tube, one end inserted into the bladder [body organ that stores urine] and the other end is attached to a bag that collects urine) drain bag's cover touched the floor; 3. Nursing staff failed to disinfect the shared blood pressure (BP) cuff (the device used to measure BP) before and after use for Resident 82. These failures had the potential for the spread of infections and communicable diseases among residents. Findings: 1.During an observation on 3/11/2024 at 10:38 a.m., NC tubing, that was dated 3/3, and was attached to a room air concentrator (RAC: a medical device that take in air from the room and filter out nitrogen to provides higher amounts of oxygen) lay on the floor next to nightstand when it was not in use in Resident 54's room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the minimum requirement to provide 3.5 Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD, it is the total number of actual direct care service hours performed by direct caregivers per patient day divided by the average patient census) for eight days for the month of August to meet the resident's needs for one of two residents (Residents 1). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 1 and other residents ' care and wellbeing. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (DM, high blood sugar), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (one-sided weakness and paralysis), and depression (a mood disorder that interferes with daily life). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 8/02/23, the MDS indicated he had a brief interview of mental status (BIMS, a structured cognitive test) score of 15 (cognitively intact).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and safe temperature level for two of three sampled residents (Resident 59, and Resident 384 ) and in hallway temperature was not maintained in the range of 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit. This failure had the potential for the residents to have an uncomfortable environment. Findings: 1. During an interview on 6/20/22 at 9:45 a.m., Resident 59 stated, I feel cold all the time, I use extra blankets, and hat. Vent is blowing cold air all the times, I informed a staff about the cold room last week. During an observation on 6/20/22 at 3:03 p.m., thermostat indicated 69 degrees Fahrenheit in hallway near Nurse's Station. During a follow up observation on 6/21/22 at 8:51a.m., thermostat indicated 70 degrees Fahrenheit in hallway near nurse's station. During a review of Resident 59's clinical record indicated she was admitted with diagnoses that include anemia (condition in which blood lacks adequate healthy red blood cells) unspecified osteoarthritis (Condition which can affect any joint in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices when: 1. Pans were stacked and stored wet; 2. There were undated, unlabeled, and outdated food items in the reach-in refrigerator and dry storage area; and 3. Colanders were stacked and stored wet. These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and food-borne illness to 83 of 85 residents who received their food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 6/20/22 at 9:10 a.m., with [NAME] 1 (Cook 1) six metal pans of various sizes were observed stacked on the counter next to the stove. The pans were upright and stacked inside of one another. All of six pans were wet on the inside and outside surfaces of the metal containers. [NAME] 1 stated he had washed the metal pans after breakfast in the three-compartment sink. [NAME] 1 confirmed the pans were wet and he stated the pans should not be stacked and stored wet and should be air-dried. Review of the facility's Food Service and Nutrition Department procedure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) for two of 20 sampled residents (Residents 31 and 8). Failure to accurately assess the residents had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to develop and implement resident-centered care plans and interventions. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 31's Change of Condition Evaluation, dated 3/7/2022, indicated Resident 31 had an unwitnessed fall and was found sitting on the floor. Resident 31's MDS dated [DATE] was reviewed. Section J1800 asked the question, Has the resident had any falls since admission/entry or reentry or the prior assessment, whichever is more recent? The person who completed the MDS coded 0, which indicated Resident 31 did not have any falls during the specified time frame. During an interview and concurrent record review with the Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN) on 6/22/2022 at 11:15 a.m., the MDSN reviewed Resident 31's medical record and confirmed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 14) when nursing staff did not apply Resident 14's left hand brace as ordered. This failure had the potential to affect the resident's care, health and well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 14's clinical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and had the diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a condition characterized by memory loss), osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease) of hand, and pain in left hand. Review of Resident 14's physician order, dated 8/25/20, indicated apply brace to left hand, ON in Am [morning] and OFF in PM [evening]. May remove during hygiene and activities of daily living (ADL) care. Check for skin redness or irritation every shift. Review of Resident 14's care plan for 'chronic pain' indicated, Interventions: apply brace to left hand, ON in Am and OFF in PM. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three out of 12 sampled residents (Residents 5, 31, and 46) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) when: 1. Resident 5 received lorazepam (brand name: Ativan; an anti-anxiety medication) without adequate indication for use, and without a gradual dose reduction (GDR, a tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued) since April 2020 (more than 2 years ago); and trazodone (medication for depression) without a GDR since August 2018 (almost for 4 years ago); 2. Resident 31 received sertraline (brand name: Zoloft; medication for depression) since April 2021 without an attempted GDR; and 3. Resident 46 received sertraline since March 2019 (more than 3 years ago) without evidence of an attempted GDR. The failure resulted in unnecessary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure food served was palatable and attractive. These deficient practices had the potential to impact the residents' nutritional status and not meet the residents' desire to be served food they felt was palatable and attractive. Findings: During an interview with Resident 60 on 6/20/2022 at 10:42 a.m., Resident 60 stated the food in the facility had no seasoning. Review of the facility menu for 6/21/2022 lunch indicated chicken parmesan breast, parslied fettuccini, seasoned cauliflower, garlic breadstick, and fruit cocktail with whipped topping. A test tray of regular and dysphagia 1 (pureed) diet was conducted on 6/21/2022 at 12:45 p.m. During the test tray, in the presence of certified dietary manager B (CDM B), the regular chicken and the regular/dysphagia 1 broccoli (replaced cauliflower) tasted bland. The regular broccoli appeared pale, overcooked and the texture was mushy. CDM B agreed the regular chicken and the regular/dysphagia 1 broccoli tasted bland. CDM B agreed the regular broccoli was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE LACRUZ, ANGELINA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/16/2016 |
| HERNANDEZ, JERRIANNE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/01/2016 |
| HURTADO, ARIEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/16/2016 |
| SANCHEZ, JOSEFA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/01/2014 |
| UNDERWOOD, KENNETH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/01/2000 |
| ROBINSON, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 02/19/2001 |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055462. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.