No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hi-Desert Medical Center D/P SNF

6601 White Feather Rd, Joshua Tree, CA 92252 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 92 certified beds · (760) 366-6437 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
63532 29 Palms Hwy · (760) 366-8491 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6448 Hallee Rd · (760) 366-3653 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
61877 29 Palms Hwy
Park
6171 Sunburst St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.7%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.0%9.8%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.1%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers10.5%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.7%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.7%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine78.6%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.2%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit32.0%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.992.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.891.571.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.10U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 6% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.1%CMS range 49.8–72.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 5.5–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay9.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 3.8–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.94
RN hours/ resident / day
0.82
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.76
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.82
RN hoursweekends
65.7%
Total nursing turnover
70.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 90.5 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-19)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision and implement elopement (when a resident leaves facility without staff's permission) preventions for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who was assessed as having a high elopement risk. This failure resulted in Resident 1 leaving the facility unsupervised, fell, and subsequently sustained a left hip fracture (broken).Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), undated, indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including sepsis (serious body-wide reaction to an infection that can damage organs) and dementia (condition that causes memory loss and trouble thinking, severe enough to affect daily life). A review of Resident 1's Elopement Risk Assessment [a tool to identify individuals likely to leave a facility unsupervised, reducing risk of injury], dated March 3, 2026, indicated, Resident 1 had dementia, wandering behaviors (when an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure services to increase range of motion (measurement of how far you can move a body part) or to prevent further decrease in range of motion were provided for three of three sampled residents (Resident 1, 2 and 3), when Resident 1, 2 and 3 were assessed for but not provided the services as ordered for the Functional Maintenance Program (FMP -formally the Restorative Nursing Assistance program or RNA- a program to aim to help residents in the long-term care to maintain the highest level of functioning like bed mobility, transfer walking, dressing etc.) after discharged from Physical Therapy and (PT- a branch of rehabilitative health that uses specially designed exercise to help residents regain or improve their physical abilities) and Occupational Therapy (OT-a branch of rehabilitative health that focuses on improving the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living such as bathing, toileting, eating, personal hygiene, etc.)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient number of nursing staff in accordance with its policy when the required number of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs) was not met for three consecutive days (April 10, 2026. through April 12, 2026). This failure had the potential to result in unmet resident's needs, such as psychosocial, physical needs, and safety concerns for 78 vulnerable residents. Findings: During an interview on April 13, 2026, at 10:25 AM, with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated, I usually don't call because sometimes it takes a long time for someone to come. During an interview on April 13, 2026, at 10:35 AM, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), the CNA 1 stated, We [the facility] usually work with not enough CNAs. During an interview on April 13, 2026, at 10:45 AM, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2), the CNA 2 stated, We have been working with short CNAs, but it is better today. During a telephone interview on April 13, 2026, at 10:50 AM, with the License Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), LVN 1 stated, We have been working with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure sufficient nursing staff was provided to meet the needs for 20 of 20 residents, who were ordered to receive restorative nursing services (a program to maintain or improve residents' physical function provided by a trained staff member such as a certified nurse assist or CNA) from February 1, 2026, through February 28, 2026. This failure resulted in missed restorative nursing services and had the potential to result in decline in residents' health and functional status.Findings: During an interview on March 17, 2026, at 9:10 AM, with the Wound Care Nurse (WCN), the WCN stated she is the only wound care nurse in the facility. The WCN further stated, due to staffing shortages, she would be reassigned from wound care duties to perform medication administration, limiting her ability to complete her assigned responsibilities. During a concurrent interview and record review on March 18, 2026, at 12:21 PM, with CNA1, the facility's RNA [restorative nurse assistant] Assignment Sheet, dated February 2026, was reviewed. The RNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure no expired medications were available for patients use for two of six medication carts (Cart 100 and Hallway Cart). This failure has the potential to affect all residents receiving beyond the use date (expired) medications, placing them at risk for ineffective therapy and medication errors, which could negatively affect residents' health and safety.Findings: During a concurrent medication cart inspection and interview on March 18, 2026, at 7:44 AM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1), the medication cart (Cart 100) was observed as follows: Omeprazole (medication that use to reduce stomach acid) 20 milligrams (mg-unit of dosing medication) with the expiration date of January 2026 (expired 46 days). Docusate Sodium (medication to prevent constipation) 5 mg with the expiration date of October 31, 2025 (expired 138 days) LVN 1 stated that she was unaware the medications were expired and reported that carts are checked by pharmacist monthly. LVN 1 further stated that there should be no expired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure administration maintained an effective oversight of facility operations for 90 of 90 residents who are residing in the facility. This failure resulted in inadequate oversight of facility operations, with the potential to negatively affect residents care needs.Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on March 18, 2026, at 8:53 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated she was unable to give the current facility assessment report (report that determines what resources are necessary to care for the facility's residents competently and outline an education and competency plan for staff) because it was attempted on October 25, 2025 but was never completed. The DON further stated it was the Administration (Admin)'s responsibility to complete the facility assessment. The DON was unable to state when the facility assessment was due or last completed. During a concurrent interview and record review on March 19, 2026, at 2:29 PM, with the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the governing body (GB - a group of people responsible for the overall direction and management of an organization) provided effective oversight of the facility. This failure resulted in lack of oversight of facility operation, leading to unaddressed systemic issues that could negatively affect residents' care.Findings: During a review of the facility documents titled, Governing Board Meeting Minutes, dated January 26, 2026, through March 16, 2026, the Governing Board Meeting Minutes indicated quality care outcomes and identified safety concerns discussed at Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI-a data driven program to review and improve facility's performance) meetings. There was no mention of staffing concerns or performance improvement progress with wound care treatment compliance, updated care plan (an individualize plan that is created based on each resident's need), unlabeled oxygen tubing, or follow ups with pharmacy recommendations. During an interview on March 19, 2026, at 2:48 PM, with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the facility assessment (a review of the facility resources that are necessary to care for its residents) annually for 90 of 90 residents who are residing in the facility. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate identification and allocation of resources necessary to meet resident care needs.Findings: During an interview on March 17, 2026, at 9:49 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the current Administrator (Admin) for the facility is the [name of facility (hospital)] Chief Executive Officer. During a concurrent interview and record review on March 18, 2026, at 8:53 AM, with the DON, the DON stated she was unable to give the current facility assessment report because it was incomplete. The DON further stated it was the Admin's responsibility to complete the facility assessment, but she assisted with the responsibility for the day-to-day operations of the facility, including administrative responsibilities such as ensuring departments (nursing, dietary, and rehabilitation) are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective system wide infection control program for the prevention and control of disease for six of seven sampled residents (Resident 25, 92, 90, 66, 30, and 4) when: 1. For five residents (Resident 25, 92, 90, 66 and 30), the nursing staff did not change the oxygen tubing (a thin, flexible tube that delivers oxygen to a patient) according to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). 2. For one resident (Resident 4), the isolation precaution (infection control methods that involve wearing appropriate cover to protect staff and residents from spreading germs or infection) sign was not posted in front of resident's room. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk of developing a respiratory infection (caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi, or parasite) and increase in cross-contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one person to another), which could negatively affect residents' health and delayed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled residents (Resident 8 and Resident 10) received necessary pressure injury (PI-injury to skin and underlying tissues that develop because of prolonged pressure, shear, or friction) treatment when the facility staff did not provide daily wound treatment. This failure had the potential to contribute to worsening of residents' wound or skin condition that could negatively affect residents' health status from delayed wound healing. Findings: 1. During a record review of Resident 8's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), undated, the admission Record indicated, Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, hypertension (high blood pressure), and cerebral palsy (a group of permanent neurological disorders appearing in infancy or early childhood that affect movement, muscle tone, and posture). During a concurrent observation and interview on March 16, 2026,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility staff reviewed and updated care plan (an individualize plan that is create based on each resident's need) and interdisciplinary team (IDT-a meeting where different professionals come together to discuss a patient's care need) regarding pressure injury (PI-injury to skin and underlying tissues that develop because of prolonged pressure, shear, or friction) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 8). This failure had the potential to contribute to worsening of Resident 8's wounds or skin condition from not reviewing intervention and evaluating the effectiveness of the treatment plan.Findings: During a record review of Resident 8's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), undated, the admission Record indicated, Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, hypertension (high blood pressure, a chronic condition where the force of blood against artery walls is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that oxygen therapy was administered in accordance with physician's order for three of six residents (Resident 92, Resident 90 and Resident 30) while receiving oxygen. This failure had the potential for placing Resident 30, Resident 92 and Resident 25 at risk for inappropriate treatment and altered oxygen saturation (how well oxygen is being delivered to the body) levels.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 92 face sheet (clinical record with demographic information), undated, the face sheet indicated, Resident 92 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis that included Bilateral (both) Humerus (arm bone) Fracture (broken). During an observation on March 16, 2026, at 12:08 PM, in Resident 92's room, Resident 92 is in bed sitting with oxygen (O2) at 2 liters per minute (L/min-unit of flow rate) via nasal cannula (tube that contains two open prongs intended to deliver oxygen into the nose). During a concurrent interview and record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act on recommendations made by the pharmacist for one of two sampled residents. (Resident 2). This failure had the potential for unnecessary medication to cause harm to Resident 2. Findings: During a record review of Resident 2's admission Record (contains demographic and medical information), undated, the admission Record indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hypertension (high blood pressure, a chronic condition where the force of blood against artery walls is consistently too high), and dementia ( a general term for a decline in mental ability-such as memory, thinking, or behavior-severe enough to interfere with daily life). During a record review of Resident 2's physician's order, dated on July 17, 2025, the physician's orders indicated, seroquel (medication-treat mood and behavioral disorder) 25 mg (milligram- unit of measurement) = 1 tab (tablet), Oral (by mouth) BID (twice a day), start date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders for one of 23 sampled residents (Resident 67), when Resident 67 received an antibiotic (medication that treats bacterial infections) intravenous (IV - administered through the vein) at an incorrect rate. This failure resulted in medication error and had the potential to result in ineffective treatment and adverse clinical outcomes such as antibiotic resistance (a condition that bacteria have evolved and difficult to kill).Findings: During a record review of Resident 67's admission History & [and] Physical (H&P-document by a physician to evaluate resident's health status), dated September 10, 2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including heart failure (heart cannot pump well enough to meet the body's needs), quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs-both arms and legs), and recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate and monitor the use of illegal substances (drug or chemical that the government has made against the law to have, use, or sell) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 tested positive for marijuana (most common name of the cannabis plant, widely used either for its mind-altering effect or for medical purposes). This failure had the potential to pose a safety hazard to Resident 1 and other residents in the facility.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's face sheet (which contains demographic and medical information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included paraplegia (paralysis of the lower half of the body), and multiple sclerosis (a condition where the body mistakenly attacks the nerves, making it harder for the brain to send messages to the rest of the body). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (facility assessment tool), dated January 12, 2026,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and 3) from verbal abuse (suing negative words and language that cause harm) from Registered Nurse (RN 1). This failure had the potential to contribute to Resident 1 and 3 distrust in the healthcare team which could negatively affect Resident 1 and 3 participating in their care that could lead to actual harm and worsen their condition.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated July 15, 2025, the H&P indicated that Resident 1 was admitted with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (a disease that causes breakdown of the protective covering of nerves which can cause numbness, weakness, pain, trouble walking, weakness, vision changes, fatigue, mood changes and other symptoms). During a review of Resident 1's Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS - test used in nursing homes and hospitals to measure a person's memory and thinking skills where a score of 13 to 15 is considered normal), dated January 24, 2026, the BIMS indicated that his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within 24 hours for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure prevented the appropriate state agencies from ensuring that the facility was taking the necessary actions to protect Resident 1 and other residents from actual or potential harm.Findings: During of a review of the facility's Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse (SOC 341, in California, it is a confidential form used to report suspected abuse or neglect of seniors or dependent adults. Mandated reporters must submit this form to local authorities within two working days of witnessing or suspecting harm), dated January 21, 2026, the SOC 341 indicated the allegation of Psychological/Mental (mind, emotion, and behavior) abuse toward Resident 1 was identified on January 13, 2026, and was reported to the Ombudsman (a state-certified advocate dedicated to protecting the rights, safety, and quality of life of the residents) and the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) on January 21, 2026 (8 days after the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received enteral nutrition (tube feeding - a delivery of liquid nutrition directly into the stomach through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG - a feeding tube that is place through the stomach used for a person who cannot eat or swallow safely)) according to the physician's order, when Resident 1 did not receive the calculated amount of feeding for approximately two days. This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 1's nutritional status placing him at risk for weight loss, dehydration, and decline in condition.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (FS- a document containing patient demographics) the FS indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Patient 1's History and Physical (H&P- a document containing demographic information), dated January 15, 2026, at 5:18 PM, the H&P indicated, Patient 1 was admitted to the facility with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, Record Review and observation, the facility failed to follow policy and procedure to provide services in a timely manner to 1 out of 4 residents to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish and emotional distress.This failure had the potential to compromise the residents' health, safety, psychosocial wellbeing and overall quality of care, when the resident was left soiled, and their activities of daily living were not met in a timely manner. Based on interviews, Record Review and observation, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure to provide services in a timely manner to 1 out of 4 residents to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish and emotional distress.This failure had the potential to compromise the residents' health, safety, psychosocial wellbeing and overall quality of care, when the resident was left soiled, and their activities of daily living were not met in a timely manner.FINDINGS:During a record review of Resident's 1's admission record (general Demographics),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed in response to safety concerns with suspected abuse for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1) when the facility reported the suspected abuse to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) on August 20, 2025, or five (5) days after the suspected abuse incident. This failure had the potential to result in a delay of an investigation to determine abuse which could continue or become more severe, other vulnerable Residents to be put at risk for abuse, worsen long-term psychological and physical effects, delay timely access to medical, psychological, and other services for healing for Resident 1.Findings: During a review of the facility's SOC 341 (California form used by specific people, called mandated reporters, to report suspected abuse or neglect of elders and dependent adults), dated August 20, 2025, at 1:00 PM, the SOC 341 indicated that Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN2) reported on Friday (August 15, 2025, at 1:00 PM), (Visitor) friend of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for resident abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's care plan (an individualize treatment plan) was not updated or revised and enhanced monitoring was not implemented. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 having psychosocial (affecting person's feelings, emotions, relationships, and sense of well-being) harm to residents such as fear, anxiety and loss of trust in staff.Findings: An unannounced visit was conducted to the facility on August 5, 2025, for an investigation of a facility reported incident of abuse. During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (FS- a document containing patient demographics), the FS indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P - a document containing demographic information), dated January 8, 2025, indicated Resident 1 has a history of depression (feeling sad, hopeless…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for resident documentation of care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2's care plan (an individualize treatment plan) was not updated with description of changes in Resident 2's condition and behaviors. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 2 deterioration, emotional distress and an increase in the risk of injury to self, other residents, and staff.Findings: An unannounced visit was conducted to the facility on August 6, 2025, for an investigation of a facility reported incident of resident abuse. A review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (FS- a document containing patient demographics), the FS indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P - a document containing demographic information), dated March 2, 2025, indicated, Resident 1 has a history of depression (feeling sad, hopeless for long period),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-center care plan (a document that outlines a patient's care, including their diagnosis, treatment goals, and nursing orders) that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs for four of five sampled residents (Resident 24, 61, 67, and 50). This failure had the potential to result in person-centered care not being provided which may lead to negative physical, mental, and psychosocial impact upon the resident's function, mood, and cognition. Findings: 1. During an observation on December 4, 2024, at 9:20 AM, on the sub-acute unit (a specialized unit where the resident breathes with the help of a medical device and need close monitoring, rehabilitation, nursing and respiratory care), Resident 24 was observed lying in bed, supine (lying on the back, face up) with eyes closed; on ventilator (a medical device that helps with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff administered medication as ordered for 23 residents of 41 sampled residents (Residents 2, 4, 8, 9, 20, 28, 41, 42, 45, 49, 53, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 64, 65, 71, 74, 147 and 295) when: 1.) The nursing staff did not give medications to 22 residents (Residents 2, 4, 8, 9, 20, 28, 41, 42, 45, 49, 53, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 64, 65, 71, 74 and 295) on December 1, 2024, as ordered and did not notify a responsible physician or a pharmacist for not giving the medications. 2.) The nursing staff did not administer Resident 147's medication by mouth as ordered and did not verify with a physician for using a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG-a feeding tube surgically inserted directly to the stomach wall to use for food and medication) tube for medication administration. These failures had resulted in unsafe medication administration and could cause adverse health outcomes from the inconsistency of medication dosage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure family or emergency contact person were notified appropriately of resident transfer for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 1) when there was no documented evidence that Resident 1's family was notified before Resident 1 was transferred to the acute care hospital for suprapubic catheter (a surgically created tube that drains urine from the bladder when other methods are not possible) exchange. This failure resulted in no communication between Resident 1's family and the healthcare team and had the potential to interfere with Resident 1's family ability to follow and participate in Resident 1's transfer process and care. Finding: During a review of resident 1's Emergency department Physician note, dated September 30, 2024, the Emergency Department Physician note indicated, resident is [AGE] year-old male with history of quadriplegia (a condition that causes a person to lose all or most motor function in their arms, hands, trunk, legs, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure Passive Range of Motion (PROM - the movement of a joint from staff or therapist with no effort from the resident) services were provided for two of five sampled residents (Resident 61 and 67) when there was no documented evidence that the Range of Motion (ROM-extent or limit to which joint can be moved around) was completed as ordered. This failure has the potential to result in further decline in physical, mental, and/or psychosocial aspects of the resident's ability to maintain and improve range of motion and mobility. Findings: 1. During an observation on December 3, 2024, at 2:03 PM, on the sub-acute unit (a specialized unit where the resident breathes with the help of a medical device and need close monitoring, rehabilitation, nursing, and respiratory care), Resident 61 was observed lying in bed, supine (lying on the back, face up) with eyes closed and the head of bed elevated. Feeding pump was infusing. Resident 61 was noted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner to provide care and services for two of three residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). This failure has the potential to jeopardize the health and safety of clinically compromised Residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when their requests for assistance with activities of daily living were not responded to promptly. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on August 29, 2024, at 1:50 PM. Resident 1 was found seated in a wheelchair in his room, it was noted that Resident 1 relied solely on the wheelchair for mobility. Resident 1 stated, It takes a long time, sometimes up to two hours for staff to answer the calls for help. During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. A review of history and physical (H&P – a formal assessment of a patient ' s health that includes an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate controlled medication (medications that can cause physical and mental dependence) verification process for a universe of 17 residents when the controlled medication verification was not accurately completed with two (2) licensed nurses for seven (7) of 20 days from August 1, 2024, through August 20, 2024. This failure had the potential in delaying the recognition of any discrepancy to the controlled medication which can negatively affect residents ' health from misuse of medication or diversion (medication illegally going to someone without a prescription) of medication to unauthorized people. Findings: During a review of the facility ' s control drug count record for 17 residents, dated August 1, 2024, through August 20, 2024, the record indicated, missing one license nurse signature on the following days and shift (work hours): On August 1, 2024: AM shift (work shift that starts at 7:00 AM and ends at 7:00 PM) On August 4, 2024: AM shift. On August 6, 2024: PM shift (work shift that starts at 7:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-26 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the controlled medication (medications that can cause physical and mental dependence) was kept securely within the facility for one resident (Resident 1) when License Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) took Resident 1 ' s acetaminophen and hydrocodone (Norco—one of controlled medications that combine two types of medications together for pain control) from the medication cart without permission. This failure had resulted in diversion (medication illegally going to someone without a prescription) of controlled medication, which had the potential formisuse of drugs and stealing of Resident 1 ' s medication that could put Resident 1 at risk for inadequate relief of pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 Face Sheet (contain resident demographic), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of unspecified focal traumatic brain injury (brain injury that is caused by an outside force). A review of Resident 1 ' s Orders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) Schedule II medication narcotic (medication which is controlled by law due to the potential for misuse/abuse), to be unlawfully diverted (medication illegally going to someone without a prescription) from the facility The facility failed to ensure strict controls for persons authorized to access controlled substances in preventing the diversion of medication, leading to potential misuse and theft of the medications for clinically compromised Residents (Residents 1 and 2) health and safety. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (general demographics), the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis to include Acute Respiratory Failure, (the inability of the respiratory system to meet the oxygenation, ventilation, or metabolic requirements of the patient) Anoxic Brain Damage ( caused by a complete lack of oxygen to the brain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to request permission, to remove a Resident ' s beard from the Responsible Person (RP, ensures the residents wishes are carried out and enforced) for one of three residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in the nursing staff not respecting Resident 1's right to have the RP exercise his wishes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic and medical information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: Alzheimer Disease (brain disorder that causes memory loss, thinking skills and changes in behavior). The face sheet indicated Resident 1 ' s wife is the responsible party. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1, the Brief Interview for Mental Status dated December 19, 2023, indicated a total score of 00 indicating severe cognitive impairment. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1, the Nurses admission Note, dated December 12, 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-08 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Supervisor (DS - plans and supervises employees in the food and nutrition services at a health care facility) was qualified and hired full-time (working 35 or more hours a week). This failure had the potential to harm 80 residents by not monitoring or managing food services to promote, maintain or restore the residents' health. Findings: During an interview on December 4, 2023, at 10:21 AM, with the Kitchen Crew Lead (KCL), the KCL stated there was a Dietary Supervisor that was recently hired and he comes a few times a week. During an interview on December 5, 2023, at 9:55 AM, with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD stated the DS was currently enrolled in a certified dietary manager (CDM- nationally recognized certification indicating the individual is qualified to manage menus, food purchasing, food preparation, and apply nutrition principles) certification program and the regional dietitian was overseeing the facility kitchen. The RD further stated he did not oversee the sanitation practices or food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food ingredients were stored to conserve nutritive value (vitamins and minerals in food), flavor, and appearance when bulk food (food items offered in large quantities) storage was not labeled with the name of the product and initial date of storage. These failures had the potential to harm 80 highly vulnerable residents by not providing food with the full nutritive value, or food palatability (taste and/or flavor of the food). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on December 4, 2023, at 10:21 AM, with the Kitchen Crew Lead (KCL), in the kitchen, two plastic bulk food containers, one contained brown flour and the second contained white flour, were inspected. It was unlabeled and undated. The KCL stated the brown flour was wheat flour and the white flour was regular flour. The KCL stated the containers were expected to be labeled with the product name and date to prevent residents from receiving old foods. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled, Receiving and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain professional standards for food service safety when: 1. There were crumbs and dust buildup on the right side of the staff refrigerator in the kitchen. 2. Food spill stains and crumbs were found in six of six food warming drawers. 3. There were trash, crumbs, and dirt buildup under the nourishment station (an area designed for storage for food and beverages) in the resident dining room area. 4. A total of four open rodent snap traps (a trap that snaps shut when the bait or trigger is disturbed) were found in the kitchen, under the metal racks for storing clean cooking supplies and nourishment station in the resident dining room area. These failures had the potential to attract pests and expose 80 highly susceptible residents who received food from the kitchen to foodborne illness (illness caused by ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) due to cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful substances or disease-causing microorganisms to food). Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed follow their own policy and procedure, and the standards of care for medication administration and reporting to physician for one of three residents reviewed for omitted (absent) medications (Resident 438) when: 1. Resident 438 had an order to receive routine Albuterol (respiratory medication) for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD - is a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). The Albuterol was ordered on October 26, 2023, at 11:52 AM and did not receive the medication until October 27, 2023, at 1:00 AM. Documentation indicated the licensed nurses and RTs did not notify the physician of the omitted medication. 2. Resident 438 had an order to receive routine Umeclidinium (respiratory medication) for COPD. Resident 438 did not receive the Umeclidinium from the time it was ordered on November 21, 2023, to the time it was discontinued on November 27, 2023. Documentation indicated the licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for one of three residents reviewed for rehabilitative and restorative care (Resident 6) when an individualized care plan for functional maintenance program was not initiated for Resident 6. This failure had the potential for inadequate treatment and management of the resident's medical conditions and had a potential to not meet the residents' personal goals, choices and preferences that could negatively impact Residents 6. Findings: During an observation on December 6, 2023, at 9:06 AM, in Resident 6's room, Resident 6 was lying on his back, with his head tilted to the right side. The head of the bed was slightly elevated. During a review of Resident 6's clinical record, the face sheet indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of osteomyelitis (bone infection). A review of Resident 6's History and Physical, dated November 20, 2023, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan (a summary of a resident's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) was revised for one of five residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 32), when Resident 32's nutrition care plan was not revised or updated from June 15, 2023, to December 6, 2023, and visual function care plan was not revised or updated since March 23, 2023. Resident 32 went from 139.5 pounds in May 2023 to 129.4 pounds in December 2023. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 32 to continue to lose weight and negatively affect her nutrition status. Findings: During an observation on December 4, 2023, at 12:40 PM through 12:48 PM, Resident 32 was sitting upright in bed, eyes closed, and appeared to be sleeping with lunch in front of her. The bowl containing chili was full, 75% of Resident 32's corn bread remained on the plate, the milk container was full, salad was untouched, and 90% of the dessert remained. No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish a safe resident smoking practice for one of two residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 439) when Resident 439's smoking assessment was not completed accurately. This failure had the potential for Resident 439's safety needs to be unmet, which could place him at risk for accidents and life-threatening injuries. Findings: A review of an undated facility document titled Current Smokers List, submitted by the facility on December 4, 2023, was conducted. It indicated Resident 439 was a current smoker. During an observation on December 6, 2023, at 1:00 PM, Resident 439 was sitting in his wheelchair by the designated smoking area. He was smoking cigarettes. There was no staff observed supervising him. During a review of Resident 439's clinical record, the face sheet (contains demographic information) indicated Resident 439 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of high blood sugar and generalized weakness. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure for enteral nutrition (a form of nutrition delivered to the digestive system in the form of a liquid usually through a feeding tube) for one of five residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident 81), when Resident 81's enteral nutrition feeding container was not dated. This failure had the potential for the enteral nutrition container and tubing set to exceed the manufacturer's prescribed hang-time (amount of time a feeding is safe to use after opening), and for Resident 81 to not receive the prescribed amount of nutritional calories resulting in weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 81's clinical record, the face sheet indicated Resident 81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included anoxic brain injury (caused by a complete lack of oxygen to the brain, which results in death of brain cells), cardiac arrest (the abrupt loss of heart function), hemorrhage into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During a review of Resident 588's clinical record, the face sheet indicated Resident 588 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (long lasting health condition that affects how the body turns food into energy). During a review of Resident 588's POLST, dated on December 1, 2023, under Section D of Information and Signatures, it indicated the Advanced Directive information was not documented. The POLST items indicating if the Advance Directive was available or not, or if the education was provided with the patient and legal representative were left blank and incomplete. During a concurrent interview and record review, on December 5, 2023, at 2:30 PM, with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 reviewed Resident 588's POLST and stated it was not filled out completely. LVN 1 acknowledged that all parts of the form should be documented in its entirety. During a concurrent interview and record review, on December 7, 2023, at 3:55 PM, with Nurse Supervisor (RN) 1, RN 1 reviewed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable, homelike environment, when the facility's main dining room was not maintained at the appropriate temperature on August 24, 2023. This failure had the potential to affect the health and wellness of 74 residents residing in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on August 24, 2023, at 11:50 AM, with Resident 1, in the Main Dining room, Resident 1 was covered on her shoulders with a blanket. Resident 1 stated It's too cold in here. I put work orders for this about a month ago, but nothing ever happened, it's been cold in here for a while. During a concurrent observation and interview, on August 24, 2023, at 11:50 AM, with Resident 2, in the Main Dining room, Resident 2 was covered on her shoulders with a blanket. Resident 2 stated the room was too cold. During a concurrent observation and interview, on August 24, 2023, at 11:50 AM, with Resident 3, in the Main Dining room, Resident 3 was covered on her shoulders with a blanket. Resident 3 stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on, interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) from abuse. This failure has the potential to place Resident 1 health, safety, and well-being at risk and increasing chances of psychosocial harm. Findings: During resident 1 admission Record (general Demographics) the document indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility June 24, 1994, with a diagnosis of C1-C4 fx (is a bone fracture of the vertebra C1 to C4), Quadriplegia (is a symptom of paralysis that affects all a person's limbs and body from the neck down) During an interview on July 26, 2023, at 11:30 AM with resident 1, he stated he has had multiple problems with CNA 1 (Certified Nursing Assistant) since 2013. States he asked CNA 1 to turn him gently and she was rough with him, states he repeatedly asked her to stop being rough and finally he I had to yell at her and curse her out because she would not stop. I then asked her to please move my arm from underneath me and she did it roughly, that I finally had to yell at her to stop and I did curse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SMITH, SHARILEEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2024
BURKETT, JOSHUAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/20/2024
FAULIS, KARENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/22/2016
MACK, KRISTINAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/21/2015
PAGANO, ANGELOIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2024
MOHAMMADI, MEELADIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/18/2026
SUTARIA, SAUMYAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/19/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555443. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next