No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Vista Pacifica Center

3674 Pacific Avenue, Jurupa Valley, CA 92509 · For profit - Corporation · 108 certified beds · (951) 682-4833 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Call the home — (951) 682-4833 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2026
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5593 Ave Juan Bautista
Pharmacy
THC1.0 mi
5584 Mission Blvd · (951) 384-5633 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3698 Pacific Ave · (909) 212-1623 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3767 Pacific Ave · (951) 630-4188

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.0%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.0%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.9%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.3%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.0%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.1%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.3%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.0%10.2%21.2%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table96.6%12.0%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.0%93.2%79.4%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.582.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.941.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.25
RN hours/ resident / day
0.74
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.05
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
25.6%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 107.4 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.19 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-05)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2022-04-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident, for one of seven residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 1), when Resident 2 struck Resident 1 a second time following an earlier physical altercation. The facility failed to ensure Resident 2 was adequately separated from Resident 1 following the initial incident to prevent further incidents. This failure resulted in Resident 1 being subjected to second physical assault and had the potential to negatively affect the resident's physical, emotional, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: On June 2, 2026, at 11:41 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 stated, on May 25, 2026, Resident 2 struck him in the back of the head while they were in the TV room. Resident 1 stated he ran away to avoid further confrontation and staff intervened. Resident 1 stated that approximately 30 minutes later, Resident 2 struck him again on the side of the head while he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-05 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were able to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services safely and effectively when: 1. Two Dietary staff were unable to demonstrate the correct concentration for the red bucket sanitizer solution. 2. One Dietary staff did not wear gloves while sanitizing the food preparation table. 3. Four Dietary Staff could not demonstrate the proper procedure for testing dish sanitization. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food) to the residents in the facility. Findings: 1. On April 29, 2025, at 1:12 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview were conducted with the [NAME] (CK). The CK was observed demonstrating how to prepare the bleach sanitizer solution for the red bucket. The CK placed water in the red bucket, and stated the ratio was approximately two quarts of water to one tablespoon of bleach. The CK pointed inside the red bucket and stated it contained two quarts. The red bucket was observed halfway…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when three cutting boards with deep indentations were found in the kitchen. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness (stomach illness acquired from ingesting contaminated food) among the residents in the facility. Findings: On May 5, 2025, at 2:01 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with the Director of Dietary Services (DDS) in the kitchen. Three cutting boards (brown, green and red color measuring at 24 inches [(a unit measurement of length)] in width and 18 inches in length) were observed with deep indentations and rough surfaces. The DDS stated, the cutting boards had indentations and should have had smooth surfaces to prevent microorganisms (germs) from growing in the grooves, which could lead to foodborne ilness among residents. A review of the U.S FDA Food Code 2022, Section 4-501.12 Cutting Surfaces, indicated, .Cutting surfaces such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe accident-free environment when the facility did not offer a smoking apron during smoking break for one of two residents (Resident 10). This failure had increased the potential for the resident to experience accidents and injury while smoking. Findings: A review of Resident 10's admission Record indicated, Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder), legal blindness, acquired absence of upper limb below elbow. A review of Resident 10's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated April 9, 2025, indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status (a short, structured test used to assess cognitive status) score of 4 (cognitively impaired). A review of Resident 10's SMOKING ASSESSMENT, dated April 28, 2025, indicated, .SAFETY .RESIDENT NEED FOR ADAPTIVE EQUIPMENT .Smoking apron .Team Decision .Safe to smoke with supervision .Uses smoking apron . A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as prescribed and used appropriately to meet the needs of the resident when: 1. One injectable antipsychotic medication (used to manage schizophrenia symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, paranoia, and/or altered sense of reality) was not administered every 28 days as prescribed by the physician and per manufacturer's prescribing information. 2. One Oral Emergency Ekit did not have an accurate expiration date on the outside of the kit. These failures had the potential for residents to receive ineffective or excessive medication therapy. Findings: 1. On May 1, 2025, Resident 46's medical record was reviewed, and the following was noted: Resident 46 was a [AGE] year-old, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (thought disorder that includes hallucination, delusion, paranoia, and altered sense of reality). There were physician orders for Invega…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of one medication in accordance with manufacturer's specifications by not protecting it from light. This failure had the potential for one resident to receive ineffective medication therapy. Findings: On April 30, 2025, at 10:25 a.m., during an inspection of the Medication Cart A located in Southside Nursing Station, it was noted there were four ipratropium/albuterol (medication used to open airways in lungs to help breathing) 0.5/3 mg (milligram - unit of measurement) unit dose inhalation solution vials, which belonged to Resident 47, stored outside the original manufacturer's foil pouch. During a concurrent interview and review of the manufacturer's storage instruction, LVN 11 acknowledged the unit dose vials should have remained in the foil pouch to protect from light. The manufacturer of ipratropium/albuterol 0.5/3 mg indicated, Protect from light. Unit-dose vials should remain stored in the protective foil pouch at all times. Once removed from the foil pouch, the individual vials…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's food preference was honored for one of three residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident 22). This failure had the potential to result in the resident refusing meals and experiencing decreased nutritional intake. Findings: During an interview on April 29, 2025, at 9:55 a.m., with Resident 22, Resident 22 stated, she had informed the dietitian of her food preference for cottage cheese but had only been receiving fruit cups. A review of Resident 22's admission Record, dated May 5, 2025, indicated Resident 22 was admitted on [DATE]. A review of Resident 22's History and Physical, dated March 23, 2025, the indicated Resident 22 was admitted with a diagnoses which included unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition (a form of undernutrition caused by a deficiency in both protein and total caloric intake) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar) without complications. A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment when the Laundry Aide (LA) did not clean the lint trap in the dryer resulting in the lint accumulation. This failure had the potential to result in a fire hazard, putting residents at risk. Findings: On May 1, 2025, at 9 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview in the laundry room, the Laundry Aide (LA) stated, she cleaned the dryer lint trap every two hours. Dryer # 3 lint trap was checked and observed to have a thick layer of lint covering the entire trap. A review of the facility document titled, Laundry Lint Cleaning Log, undated, indicated the following: .Lint must be cleaned every two hours . Further review of the Laundry Lint Cleaning Log, dated May 1, 2025, indicated: - 7:30 a.m. - signed with initials; - 9 :30 a.m. - signed with initials; - 11:30 a.m. - signed with initials; and - 1:30 p.m. - signed with initials. An additional review of the log indicated that it had been signed ahead of the scheduled times. On May 1, 2025, at 9:18 a.m., during a concurrent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-04-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) to notify Resident 1's representative (conservator) following an incident involving contraband ( a metal fork) found in the resident's room. This failure had the potential to exclude the resident's representative from being involved in the care planning and decision-making regarding resident's safety and psychosocial status. Findings: A review of Resident 1's medical records, titled, Resident Information, dated, April 8, 2025, at 9:38 p.m., indicated, resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of unspecified Schizophrenia (a mental health disorder that affects thoughts, feelings and behaviors, characterized by a disconnection from reality, including delusions, hallucinations). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) indicated, Resident 1 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (cognitive assessment) score of 09 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment). A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-04-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan and implement appropriate interventions for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) after the resident was found with contraband (a metal fork) under his mattress. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to retain or collect additional contraband without staff knowledge, placing the resident and others at risk for harm. Findings: A review of Resident 1's medical records, titled, Resident Information, dated, April 8, 2025, at 9:38 p.m., indicated, resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of unspecified Schizophrenia (a mental health disorder that affects thoughts, feelings and behaviors, characterized by a disconnection from reality, including delusions, hallucinations). Further review indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status ({BIMS}-cognitive assessment) score of 09 out of 15 (moderate cognitive impairment). A review of Resident 1's progress notes, dated April 2, 2025, at 8:50 a.m., by Program…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility failed to ensure the resident was treated with dignity and respect for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Mental Health Worker (MHW 1) did not assist the resident after he fell from his wheelchair and failed to provide support when the resident dropped his cigarette. This failure resulted in Resident 1 becoming angry and agitated with staff member. Findings: A review of Resident 1's record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition with symptoms of schizophrenia [thoughts or experiences that seem out of touch with reality, disorganized speech or behavior] and a mood disorder [intense and persistent changes in mood, energy, and behavior]) and osteoarthritis (tissues in the joint break down over time) of knee. A review of Resident 1's Progress Notes, dated February 15, 2025, indicated, .Incident Note .Approximately at 1950 (7:50 p.m.), res (Resident 1) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report the neglect for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within 2-hours. Resident 1 was denied a cigarette and left without assistance back into his wheelchair by Mental Health Worker (MHW) 1. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 to remain at risk of further harm and emotional distress. Findings: On February 27, 2025, at 10:50 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Administrator (Admin), who stated, he was the facility's abuse coordinator and that staff were expected to report all witnessed or suspected abuse or neglect within two hours to CDPH and other agencies. A review of Resident 1's record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition with symptoms of schizophrenia [thoughts or experiences that seem out of touch with reality, disorganized speech or behavior] and a mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement ongoing infection surveillance monitoring for suspected scabies (a highly contagious skin condition caused by mites that burrow into the skin), for six of six residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6). This deficient practice had the potential for a delay in the care and treatment and possible spread of infection throughout the facility. Findings: On September 4, 2024, at 10:50 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to investigate infection control issues. On September 4, 2024, at 11:14 a m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 was observed to be sitting up in bed with legs exposed. Resident 1's lower extremities were observed to be red with rash alll over. In a concurrent interview, Resident 1 stated he had scabies for a month, and the facility was just treating him now. Resident 1 stated the physician saw him on September 1, 2024, and told him he had scabies. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP - professional who ensures healthcare workers and patients are doing all the things they should to prevent infections) completed the required specialized training for the IP certification program. This failure resulted in the Infection Control and Prevention Program of the facility not having the benefit of a fully qualified and competent IP having the potential to negatively affect the quality of care provided to all the residents. Findings: On September 4, 2024, at 10:50 a.m. an unannounced visit was made to the facility. On September 4, 2024, at 1:10 p.m., an interview with the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) was conducted. The designated IP stated she did not have IP certification at this time. On September 4, 2024, at 2:52 p.m., an interview with Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. The DON stated the designated IP was not certified. The DON stated the designated IP did not have to be certified to be in the position if in the process of certification. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of three residents sampled (Resident A) did not receive candy infused with cannabis (dried leaves and flowering tops of the Cannabis sativa or Cannabis indica plant which contains active chemicals that cause drug-like effects all through the body) while at facility. This failure had the potential to cause untoward effects of the cannabis to Resident A's overall health and mental condition. Findings: On August 13, 2024, at 11:00 a.m., an unannounced investigation was conducted at the facility for a complaint of resident abuse and quality of care. On August 13, 2024, at 1:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with Program Counselor (PC) 1. PC 1 stated staff donate candy to the facility on a regular basis, the counseling program would collect the candies, and would give out the candy as a reward to the residents. PC 1 stated some canabis infused candies which contained THC (the substance primarily responsible for the effects of marijuana on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices in preventing the transmission of the coronavirus infection (COVID-19 - illness caused by a virus that can be transmitted from person to person) were implemented in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure and Center for Disease Control (CDC) guideline, when the residents and Healthcare Personnels (HCP/staff) were not tested for COVID-19 timely. This failure resulted in a delay in the identification of residents and HCP who were COVID-19 positive, thereby delayed the implementation of infection control measures to prevent further transmission of COVID-19 in the facility. Findings: On January 2, 2024, at 9:18 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted for a Focused Infection Control survey and investigation of a Facility Reported Incident. On January 2, 2024, a review of the facility's document titled, (name of facility) - Resident and Employee COVID-19 Tracking (Employees Tested Positive), indicated the HCP were positive for COVID-19 on the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse by a resident (Resident A) towards another resident (Resident B) was reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) immediately, or not later than two hours after the allegation was made. This failure had the potential to result in a delay of the implementation of appropriate actions, provisions, and protections to the residents and placed the residents at risk for further abuse. Findings: On July 27, 2023, at 9:30 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of abuse. On July 27, 2023, at 10:58 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). She stated she received report in the morning of July 14, 2023, that Resident A and Resident B were involved in an altercation that occurred on July 13, 2023, at around 5 p.m. She stated Resident B spit at Resident A's face and shoved him when Resident A told him to stop spitting on the floor. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. 38 insulated plate covers, seven insulated plate bases, and three full sheet metal pans were stacked and stored wet found in the readily to use storage areas; 2. Two various size of cooking pans had dry and heavy black substance buildups on the cooking surfaces and readily available for use; 3. The ice machine was not clean and sanitized properly per the manufacturer's recommendations; 4. The sanitizer concentration was not at the correct range for the manual ware washing in the three-compartment sink; 5. The kitchen did not have the correct manufacturer's instruction to have correct concentration for the sanitizer solution in the red bucket (red buckets are used as a standard of practice to contain sanitizer solution); and 6. The interior of the microwave was found dirty with dry whitish liquid spill and food debris on the side panel. These failures had the potential to cause food-borne illness in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. The facility's policy and procedure on Advance Directive (AD - a written instruction such as a living will, relating to the provision of treatment and services when the individual is unable to make decisions) was followed, for 16 of 26 residents reviewed for AD (Residents 1, 23, 36, 42, 51, 53, 54, 57, 65, 67, 70, 75, 76, 83, 86, and 106) when there was no documentation whether the resident chose to complete or decline to formulate an AD when it was offered; and 2. Information regarding formulating an AD was provided to the resident representative (RR), for one of 26 residents reviewed for AD (Resident 16), who did not have the capacity to understand or make a decision for himself. These failures had the potential for the residents to not exercise their right to complete or not complete an AD. Findings: 1. On April 19, 2022, through April 22, 2022, Residents 1, 23, 36, 42, 51, 53, 54, 57, 65, 67, 70, 75, 76, 83, 86, and 106 records were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was being followed for the therapeutic diet (a diet that is usually a modification of a regular diet. It is modified or tailored to fit the nutrition needs of a particular person. It could be a part of the treatment of a medical condition and normally prescribed by a physician) for lunch on April 18, 2022, and lunch on April 19, 2022, when: 1. Eight residents (Residents 6, 31, 34, 54, 56, 61, and 66) who were on NAS (no added salt) diet received salt packets with their meals; and 2. Four residents (Residents 39, 69, 75, and 104) who were on fortified (enhanced food addition to increase calories and/or protein) diet received regular mashed potatoes with their meals. These failures had the potential to result in compromising the medical and nutrition status of those 11 residents. Findings: 1. During a dining observation of the lunch meal on April 18, 2022, at 12:05 p.m., Resident 6 was observed to have a diet card which indicated NAS, regular texture diet with large portion on his lunch meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control precautions to prevent cross-contamination (transfer of bacteria or other contaminants from one surface to another), when one facility staff was observed wearing long artificial fingernails while preparing medications for the residents. This failure increased the risk of cross-contamination which could result in the development and transmission of infections to a vulnerable population of 106 residents in the facility. Findings: On April 21, 2022, at 8:36 a.m., medication administration observation was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1. LVN 1 was observed wearing long artificial fingernails (approximately one inch) while preparing the residents' medications. LVN 1 was observed separating a stack of multiple plastic medication cups. LVN 1's long artificial fingernails were observed to touch the inner part of the plastic medication cups. LVN 1 was observed to hand the medication cup to the resident and the resident drank the medication from the medication cup. On April…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address the use of anticoagulant (medication to prevent blood clots) medication, for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 58). This failure had the potential for Resident 58 to be at risk of bleeding or adverse reactions from the medication and to not be managed and provide immediate appropriate treatment and interventions. Findings: On April 18, 2022, at 9:39 a.m., during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 58 was interviewed. Resident 58 stated he was on a blood thinner medication. On April 18, 2022, Resident 58's record was reviewed. Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hypertension (elevated blood pressure). The Order Summary Report, dated April 21, 2022, included a physician's order, dated February 16, 2022, which indicated, .Xarelto (medication to prevent blood clots) Tablet Give 20 mg (milligram - a unit of measurement) by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the correct amount of eye drop medication was administered according to the physician's order, for one of six residents (Resident 103) observed during medication administration observation. This failure resulted in Resident 103 to not receive the prescribed amount of the eye drop medication and had the potential for complications such as loss of vision and blindness. Findings: On April 21, 2022, at 8:36 a.m., medication administration observation was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1. LVN 1 was observed to prepare Resident 103's Brimonidine eye drop medication (medication to treat eye disorder) and handed the bottle of eye drop medication to Resident 103. Resident 103 was observed to administer and instill one drop of the eye medication into each eye. The medication solution was observed to drop on Resident 103's eye lashes, instead of into the inner lower eyelid. There was no instructions or teaching given to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate foot care and treatment was provided, for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 65), when the facility did not provide diabetic shoes with plastic inserts as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 65 to develop complications on the feet related to diabetes mellitus (DM - abnormal blood sugar). Findings: On April 19, 2022, at 10:54 a.m., during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 65 was observed wearing slippers. Resident 65 declined to be interviewed. On April 19, 2022, Resident 65's record was reviewed. Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus. The Order Summary Report, included a physician's order, dated December 14, 2021, which indicated, .Provide Diabetic shoes with plastic Inserts r/t (related to) Type 2 DM . There was no documented evidence Resident 65 received the diabetic shoes the physician ordered. On April 21,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required supervision during smoke break were monitored closely, for one of 97 residents (Resident 16) observed for smoking. This failure had the potential to place Resident 16 at risk for injuries and accidents related to smoking. Findings: On April 18, 2022, at 11:45 a.m., Resident 16 was observed at the patio during smoke break. Resident 16 was observed sitting in his wheelchair smoking a cigarette without wearing a smoking apron. Resident 16 was blind and had left upper limb and left lower limb amputations (surgical removal of the limb). In a concurrent interview with Resident 16, resident responded with incoherent speech. While Resident 16 was smoking his cigarette with his right hand, the cigarette ashes fell on his right side and onto the floor, nearly missing his body and clothing. In addition, Resident 16 was not aware the cigarette ashes had fallen. On April 18, 2022, beginning at 4:19 p.m. to 4:25 p.m., Resident 16 was observed at the patio during smoke break. Resident 16 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-22 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the depakene level (laboratory test done to check the depakene [medication to treat impulse disorder] level in the blood) were completed as ordered by the physician, for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident 46). This failure had the potential for Resident 46 to not be monitored for the therapeutic level of the depakene medication needed to effectively address his impulse disorder. Findings: On April 20, 2022, Resident 46's record was reviewed. Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a mental disorder). The document titled, Order Summary Report, included the following physician orders: - .Depakene Solution (Valproate Sodium) Give 500 mg (milligrams - unit of measurement) by mouth three times a day for mood swings related to Schizophrenia ., dated September 26, 2021; and - .Fasting Free Valproic Acid .one time a day every 1 (one) month(s) starting on the 2nd .for depakote use ., dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-22 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's food preference was honored, for one of residents observed during meal observation (Resident 6). This failure had the potential for Resident 6's food intake be affected and could result in weight loss. Findings: On April 18, 2022, at 11:57 a.m., during lunch observation in the dining room, Resident 6 was observed being served with the following food items: - Shredded beef with rice; - Mixed vegetables; - Four oz. (ounce - unit of measurement) of milk; - Four oz. of juice; and - One slice of cake. Resident 6's diet card indicated, No: Milk to drink. In a concurrent interview with Resident 6, he stated he did not drink milk and he did not like it. Resident 6 was observed to not drink the milk. On April 19, 2022, at 12:09 p.m., during lunch observation in the dining room, Resident 6 was observed being served with the following food items: - Breaded chicken cutlet; - Mashed potatoes with gravy; - Mixed vegetables; -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with professional standards of practice when medications were not administered immediately after they were prepared and were not documented as given immediately after they were administered, for nine of nine residents observed during medication pass (Residents 26, 64, 48, 61, 72, 42, 60, 27, and 32). These failures had the potential to result in medication errors. Findings: On January 23, 2020, at 8:35 a.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was interviewed. LVN 1 stated she was done with medication administration scheduled for 9 a.m. LVN 1 stated for medication administration scheduled at 9 a.m., she would start pre-pouring the medications (process of preparing medications in advance and storing them until they were administered to the resident/s) by 7:20 a.m. for all the residents who were scheduled to receive medications at 9 a.m. LVN 1 stated she would start pre-pouring the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. On January 24, 2020, the record for Resident 32 was reviewed. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hypertension and hypothyroidism (low level of thyroid hormone in the blood). The document titled, Order Review Report, for January 2020, included a physician's order, dated July 31, 2018, which indicated, Lopressor (a medication to lower blood pressure) Tablet Give 25 mg by mouth two times a day .Hold if SBP < 100 HR < 60 . The MAR, for December 2019, indicated lopressor was administered to Resident 32 on December 8, 9, and 28, 2019 (three times), when Resident 32 had SBP readings below 100. The MAR, for January 2020, indicated lopressor was administered to Resident 32 on January 1, 3, 4, 15, and 17, 2020 (five times), when Resident 32 had SBP readings below 100. On January 24, 2020, at 1:31 p.m., LVN 2 was interviewed. LVN 2 stated Resident 32's BP should be taken before administering the BP medication to make sure the BP medication parameters on the physician's order or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu for low fat low cholesterol diet was followed, for 12 of 12 residents who were on low fat low cholesterol diet. This failure had the potential for the residents to not receive the appropriate diet which could compromise their nutritional status and may lead to medical complications. Findings: On January 23, 2020, the facility document titled, DAILY MENU GUIDE, was reviewed. The menu indicated, .Low Chol (cholesterol) Low Fat .jelly . On January 23, 2020, between 11:40 a.m. to 12:25 p.m., and between 12:40 p.m. and 1:15 p.m., a tray line observation was conducted with the Dietary Staff (DS). The residents who were on low fat low cholesterol diet were observed to receive margarine instead of jelly. Jelly was observed to not be available during the tray line service. On January 23, 2020, at 1:15 p.m., the Director of Dietary Services (DDS) and the DS were interviewed. The DDS and the DS confirmed there was no jelly available for the residents who were on low fat low cholesterol diet during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 05A264. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next