George L Mee Memorial Hospital D/P SNF
300 Canal Street, King City, CA 93930 · Non profit - Corporation · 48 certified beds · (831) 385-6000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (30) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.3% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 27.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.9% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 7.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.55 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.79 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 39.8 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.16 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.72 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.32 to 0.75 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
30 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide and served food at an appropriate temperature.This failure placed the 40 residents eating at the facility at risk of poor food intake further compromising their nutritional status.Findings:During an interview with Resident 5 on 1/20/2026 at 10:54 a.m., Resident 5 stated he always received his morning breakfast cold.During an interview with Resident 23, the resident council (an organized group of people living in a residential facility-such as a nursing home, assisted living, or public housing-who meet regularly to discuss concerns, plan, activities, and advocate for improvements to their quality of life) president on 1/20/2026 at 11:44 a.m., Resident 23 stated, 97% of the food served to them were cold.During a concurrent observation of the resident council meeting on 1/21/2026 at 11:00 a.m., inside the facility's social dining room, there were 10 resident council members and the resident council president, Resident 23 were present at the meeting. When residents at that meeting were asked if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when:1.The kitchen dry storage room temperature was not checked in the afternoon from 1/1 to 1/15/2026 and no logged temperature check from 1/16/2026 - 1/20/2026, as indicated in their dry storage temperature log;2. The box of lemons stored in the walk-in refrigerator had one lemon covered with whitish substance mixed with other lemons;3.The staff personal purse was stored in the clean plate storage rack;4.The black storage rack for plastic cups, clean plates and metal food containers had some dust like substances and food crumbs; and5.Food service worker K (FSW K) kept on touching her eyeglasses while mixing the batter of an apple sauce bar without changing gloves and performing hand hygiene.These failures had the potential to cause food contamination and spread food-borne illness to all 40 residents who received food from the kitchen.Findings:1.During the initial kitchen observation on 1/20/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three out of four residents (Residents 25, 9, and 1) were free from chemical restraints (the use of medications such as psychotropic medications [drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors, example is antipsychotics, antidepressants, anti-anxiety, hypnotics] not for therapeutic reasons, but to restrict a person's freedom of movement or control their behavior) when:1.Resident 25 continued to receive quetiapine (brand name is Seroquel - an antipsychotic [AP] medication used to treat schizophrenia [a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought], bipolar disorder [sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs] , and major depressive disorder [a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest], improving mood, thought, and behavior) without adequate indications for its use and there was no scheduled Abnormal Involuntary Movement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessment for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident 9 and Resident 5) when:1.Resident 9's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] did not reflect her actual pressure injuries (PI - localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence)at the time of assessment; and2.Resident 5's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] did not reflect the actual pressure injuries he was admitted with.These failures resulted in inaccurate MDS assessments submitted to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS - a federal agency that provides coverage to more than 160 million through Medicare, Medicaid.works in partnership with the entire health care community to improve quality, equity and outcomes in the health care system) and had the potential to affect Resident 9 and Resident 5's care.Findings:1.Review of Resident 9's face sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to meet the professional standards of practice for seven of 12 sampled residents (Residents 22, 9, 34, 2, 3, 4, 35 and 21) when:1.Resident 22 had no care plan developed for used of apixaban (brand name: Eliquis, an anticoagulant drug known as blood thinners, prevent or reduce the formation of harmful blood clots in blood vessels);2.Resident 9 had no care plans developed for used of quetiapine (brand name is Seroquel - an antipsychotic medication used to treat schizophrenia [a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought], bipolar disorder [sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs] , and major depressive disorder [a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest], improving mood, thought, and behavior) and trazodone (an antidepressant medication, used to treat depression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their Leave of Absence (LOA) policy and procedures (PnP) for two of 45 residents (Resident 20 and 45) when licensed nurses (LN) did not complete and document Resident 20 and 45's mental, physical, and functional assessments prior to leaving and upon returning to the facility.This failure could potentially compromise Resident 20 and 45's safety and well-being.Findings:Review of Resident 45's face sheet indicated Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcoholic cirrhosis (the permanent scarring of the liver, where healthy tissue is replaced by scar tissue, making it hard for the liver to function properly, leading to potential liver failure), alcohol dependence (also known as alcoholism, is the most serious form of drinking problem and describes a strong, often uncontrollable desire to drink), ascites of liver (abnormal buildup of fluid in the abdominal (belly) cavity, causing swelling, discomfort, and rapid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper labeling and storage of medications was followed according to the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) and/or manufacturer's specifications when: 1. One vials of tuberculin purified protein (Aplisol- a sterile aqueous solution of purified protein fraction for intradermal administration used in the diagnoses of tuberculosis) with expired date of [DATE]; 2. One vial of Admelog (insulin -lispro-a fast-acting mealtime insulin that helps to control blood sugar was expired on [DATE]; 3. A bottle of Latanoprost 0.005% (used to treat glaucoma [a condition in which increased pressure in the eye can lead to gradual loss of vision]) eye drop was open and undated. 4. A bottle of latanoprost 0.005% was identified inside a box unopened with seal and on the box label refrigerate until open. 5. Medication cart CC was left unlocked during medication administration; and 6. Controlled medication disposition was left in the med cart. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure resident's foods brought from home were stored in a safe and sanitary manner, when one refrigerator with built in freezer designated for residents have perishable food (likely to spoil, decay or become unsafe to consume) that were not dated and discarded. This failure had the potential for the contamination of residents' food.Findings:During an observation and concurrent interview with licensed vocational nurse B (LVN B) on 1/27/2026 at 4:00 p.m., inside the locked room in the skilled nursing facility where the residents' refrigerator with built in freezer was located. LVN B stated residents' food brought from home should be labeled with resident's name, open date or date it was brought in, and she also stated, if the food was opened, it should be discarded after 72 hours. Inside the freezer, there were: 10 total homemade tamales stored in zip lock bags, two in each zip lock bags, they were placed on a plastic container with resident's room number and dated 1/4/2026; and one homemade tamale…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices when:1. Resident room with enhanced barrier precaution (EBP - infection control measures that involve using gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities, in addition to standard precautions) signage did not have isolation cart;2. Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN) did not follow the proper sequence of wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and touches LVN face area with clean gloves, did not clean the overbed table (an adjustable table designed to roll over a bed and provide a flat and stable surface) without placing a barrier first (such as a clean paper towel) before placing then glucometer (a portable device used to measure the concentration of glucose in the blood) and insulin syringe (a sterile , single -use device for injecting insulin);3. LVN did not clean the overbed table in the isolation room and did not place a barrier before placing the cup of medication in the table;4.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and administer pneumococcal vaccine (PV, immunization against bacteria that causes pneumonia [a lung infection]) for three of five sampled residents (Resident 3, 5,and 20,) requiring PV vaccines, and Resident 5's missing Flu vaccine (an annual seasonal flu vaccine is the best way to help reduce the risk of getting flu and any of its potentially serious complications) in accordance with the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations. This failure had the potential to compromise the resident's health.Findings:1.During a concurrent interview and record review with the Quality Nurse Coordinator (QNC) on 1/29/26 at 4:58 p.m., the QNC reviewed Resident 3's admission and immunization records. The QNC confirmed Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE] and that Resident 3 had a history of getting the pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23, a vaccine that can prevent pneumococcal disease) on 11/22/2013. The QNC confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 20 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's rights to confidentiality of protected health information (PHI, any information in the medical record that can be used to identify an individual and that was created, used, or disclosed in the course of providing a health care service such as diagnosis or treatment) for two of 12 residents' (Residents 3, and 40) clinical records, when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) F computer screen was left open and unattended in the hallway near residents 3 and 40's room during medication pass. These failures had the potential to result in unauthorized access to the resident's health information.Findings 1a. During a medication administration observation on 1/22/26, at 11: 28 a.m., the Med cart CC containing an open laptop computer was left unattended in the hallway outside of Resident 40's room. The laptop computer was on, and the screen displayed residents' information and medication records when LVN F left to check the blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident receiving dialysis (removal of waste and excess fluid from the body) treatment received care consistent with professional standards for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 7) when the nursing facility/dialysis unit communication reports (NF/DUCR) were incomplete. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 7's dialysis care not being properly communicated and could put Resident 7 at risk for complications.Findings: Review of Resident 7's clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (kidney failure, kidney's no longer functioning on a permanent basis), hypertension (high blood pressure), Anemia in chronic kidney disease, Aortic stenosis (narrowing of the aortic valve opening),Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD - a progressive incurable lung disease-primarily caused by smoking- that causes inflammation, destroyed air sacs, and restricted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the controlled substance (drugs with high potential for abuse or addiction) medications were fully accounted for on the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) to indicate they were given for one out of four residents (Residents 29) showed that medications were signed out of the Control Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications). This failure had the potential for access to medications and supplies by unauthorized persons such as residents and visitors.Findings: During the review of the CDRs for one (1) random resident receiving PRN (meaning as needed) medications was requested for review during the survey. A review of Resident 29's eMAR indicated to give Acetaminophen -Codeine (used to treat severe pain) Oral tablet 300 MG -30 MG (milligram, unit of dose of measurement) by mouth three times daily as needed for severe pain with start date of 10/1/25. During a concurrent interview and record review with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) D on 1/21/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-28 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food and nutrition services staff carried out the functions of food and nutrition service competently according to facility policy and standards of practice when: 1. Two kitchen staff were unable to properly test the dish machine sanitizer solution concentration. 2. Kitchen staff did not correctly verbalize the cool down process for cooked foods. 3. Kitchen staff did not wash melons prior to cutting. These failures had the potential to expose residents to bacterial contamination, that can result in food borne illnesses for all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent kitchen observation and interview on 6/24/24 at 10:41 a.m. with Dietary Aide- Dishwasher (DSW) E demonstrated how to test the concentration of the sanitation solution for the dish machine. After DSW E washed multiple loads of dishes through the dish machine, DSW E dipped a test strip (used to detect the concentration of chemical sanitizing solution) in the dish machine solution tank. DSW E then compared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety and sanitation methods were followed according to standards of practice and facility policy when: 1. The ice machine had visible pink slime and tan colored residue on the ice making parts. 2. Two drainage pipes did not have air gaps. 3. Three floor sink drains were visibly dirty with dark black and brown stains, crumbs, and food debris. 4. Expired sliced cheese, sliced pears, and cranberry juice were found in the reach-in and walk-in refrigerators. 5. [NAME] bell peppers had grayish and black spots resembling mold in the walk-in refrigerator. 6. Metal shelves on a dish drying rack and inside the walk-in refrigerator were rust. 7. A reach-in freezer door gasket was dirty with black and brown sticky grime and residue. 8. Serving scoops with food debris stuck in the scoop were stored with clean scoops. 9. Cutting boards were deeply worn with multiple cuts and tan stains in the center. These failures had the potential to expose residents to contaminants that could cause foodborne illness.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for an advance directives (AD, a written instruction for healthcare when the individual is incapacitated) and for completion of physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST, a document that specifies the medical treatments the resident wants to receive during serious illness) form for 7 of 8 sampled residents (Residents 9, 22, 24, 26, 31, 32, and 184). These failures have the potential for delivery of medical services against residents' wishes. Findings: Review of Resident 9's face sheet (FS, a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 9's POLST form, dated 7/14/2016, indicated section D for AD's all three options were left blank, therefore not completed. Review of Resident 22's FS indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 22's clinical record indicated, there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, resident-centered care plans for six out of thirteen sampled residents (Residents 15, 8, 3, 5, 1, and 29), when the activity care plans of Residents 15, 8, 3, 5, 1, and 29, were not comprehensive and resident-centered. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not receiving the interventions necessary to maintain their highest level of well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 15's clinical records (history of someone's health) indicated, Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD, when the kidneys have mild to moderate damage and are less able to filter waste and fluid out of the blood), dementia (loss of memory) with behavioral problem, and hypertension (high blood pressure). During an observation of Resident 15 on 6/24/24 at 12:40 p.m., Resident 15 sat reclined in her wheelchair with her head slightly elevated.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure approved menus were followed and emergency menus were developed to properly feed residents in an emergency. These failures had the potential for the facility to not meeting Residents' nutritional needs. Findings: 1. During an interview on 6/24/24 at 10:00 AM in the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM), a copy of the facility's therapeutic menu spreadsheet was requested but the DM stated they did not use a therapeutic menu spreadsheet. The DM stated the Cooks use a daily production tally sheet with the serving size amounts for each food item and total number of diet meals to make on it. A review of the facility's Regular menu titled Season's Harmony Week 5 Menu 6/23/24-6/29/24, indicated, .Tuesday .Lunch- Garden salad with cherry tomatoes, salad dressing, Pesto grilled salmon, Orzo with lemon & herbs, Italian vegetable blend, tartar sauce, snickerdoodle cookies . A review of kitchen's Daily Production Tally, dated 6/24/24 indicated, . Meal: Lunch .Orzo with lemon and herbs, ½ cup . (cup, a unit of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a manner which conserved flavor and nutritive value when hot foods were served cold and cold foods were served hot, and when pureed food recipes was not followed, which resulted in lumpy foods for three residents. These deficient practices had the potential to decrease the food intake of residents and negatively impact their nutritional status. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour observation and interview on 6/24/24 at 10:04 a.m., an uncovered metal sheet pan with cooked green peas was resting on warm water on the trayline. A [NAME] (CK A) stated the green peas were prepared around 9:15 a.m. for that day's lunch. Another large metal sheet pan with cooked chili (a type of stew that typically contains ground meat, beans, and tomatoes) was resting inside the food warmer with other sheet pans of cooked foods. CK A stated the chili was for dinner. The DM stated the daily mealtimes when the trayline started were breakfast 7:30 AM, lunch 11:30 A.M., and dinner 5:30 P.M. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity for 2 of 3 sampled Residents (Residents 31 and 32) when Residents 31 and Resident 32's foley catheter (F/C, a semi-flexible plastic tube, inserted into a person's urinary bladder [a body organ that stores urine] one end and the other end attached to a bag that collects urine) drain bags were left uncovered. This failures had the potential to negatively affect the psychosocial well-being and health of Residents 31 and 32. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 31's face sheet (FS, a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 31's admission diagnoses included neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control), and renal cell carcinoma (kidney cancer). Review of Resident 31's physician order, dated 5/1/2024, indicated F/C. Review of Resident 31's minimum data set (MDS, a clinical and functional assessment tool)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure (P&P) for oxygen (gas that supports life) therapy for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 31), when oxygen was administered to Resident 31 without a physician's order for it. This failure resulted in Resident 31 receiving oxygen without a physician's order. Findings: Review of Resident 31's face sheet (a document that gives a resident's information at a quick glance) indicated Resident 31 admitted to facility on 3/25/2024. Review of Resident's admission diagnoses included renal cell carcinoma (type of kidney cancer), metastatic cancer of spine (cancer cells spread to spine [back bone] from elsewhere in the body), severe anemia (a condition when decreased red blood cells cannot provide sufficient oxygen to body), and palliative care (specialized form of care that provides symptom relief, comfort, and support to residents living with serious illnesses). Review of Resident 31's current physician's orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to accommodate food dislikes and preferences for one out of three sampled resident (Resident 30). This failure had the potential for negative effects on health secondary to decreased food intake for Resident 30. Findings: During lunch observation in facility's dining room on 6/24/2024 at 12:17 p.m., cut carrot pieces mixed with Italian vegetables was served, and soup was not served, for Resident 30's lunch meal. Review of Resident 30's lunch tray card dated 6/24/2024 indicated under dislikes, No Carrots, and under preferences, it indicated, soup daily at lunch & dinner. Review of facility's lunch menu for 6/24/2024 indicated, Italian vegetable blend, along with other food items. During a concurrent interview, and record review of Resident 30's lunch tray card, dated 6/24/2024, with certified nursing assistant H (CNA H) on 6/24/2024 at 12:21 p.m., CNA H acknowledged carrots were indicated under dislikes and soup daily at lunch and dinner were under preferences for Resident 30. CNA H stated dietary staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement proper infection prevention and control practices for one out of five residents observed for medication administration, (Resident 16), when the registered nurse did not perform hand hygiene; such that, after throwing used gloves in the trash bin, she proceeded to prepare medications of Resident 16. This failure had the potential to spread infections, and compromise residents' health and safety in the facility. Findings: During the medication pass observation with registered nurse G (RN G), on 6/26/24 at 9:10 a.m., RN G threw away her used gloves in the trash bin that was attached to the side of the medication cart, and then proceeded to prepare medications to administer to Resident 16 without performing hand hygiene. During another medication pass observation with RN G, on 6/26/24 at 9:50 a.m., RN G again threw away, her used gloves in the trash bin that was attached to the side of the medication cart, and then proceeded to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. Undated food, food past their used-by date, and rotten lettuce were found in the refrigerators and on the shelves in the kitchen; 2. Dietary Aid A (DA A) did not cover his beard with a hair net; and, 3. [NAME] B (CK B) did not cover the hair in the back of her head in a hair net. These failures had the potential to cause the growth of micro-organisms which could cause foodborne illness and cross-contaminated food for the 31 residents eating at the facility. Findings: 1. On 6/13/22 at 10:15 a.m., during an observation of the refrigerators and the storage shelves in the kitchen, with the dietician (DT), the following were observed: a. Two cans of nacho cheese with a used-by date of 12/26/21 b. Eight burger buns with a used-by date of 6/2/22 c. Nine english muffin with a used-by date of 6/12/22 d. Eleven hoagie rolls with a used-by date of 6/12/22 e. Four bags of 12 burger buns in each bag with a used-by date of 6/12/22 f. One…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store medications appropriately when: 1. Two of three medication carts were left unlocked and unattended; and 2. Residents 9's sevelamer (medication used to control high blood levels of phosphorus in people with chronic kidney disease) 800 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass) was left on the medication cart unattended. These failures had the potential to result in the access of medications by unauthorized personnel or residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/14/22 at 2:09 p.m., licensed vocational nurse G (LVN G) was sitting inside the nurse station. Her medication cart was parked on the side of the nurse station, and it was unlocked. During and observation on 6/16/22 at 5:20 p.m., the director of staff development (DSD) was sitting inside the nurse station. Her medication cart was parked outside of the nurse station, and it was unlocked. During the interviews with LVN G and the DSD on 6/14/22 at 2:09 p.m. and on 6/16/22 at 5:20 p.m., LVN G and the DSD stated the medication carts should be locked when they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-06-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 16% error rate when four medication errors out of 25 opportunities were observed during a medication pass for 3 of 14 residents (16, 17, and 31). These failures resulted in medications not given in accordance with prescriber's orders, which had the potential for residents to not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medications (in the case of underdosing) or had the potential to for preventable side effects for the residents (in the case of overdosing). Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 6/14/22 at 11:46 a.m., with licensed vocational nurse C (LVN C), LVN C checked Resident 17's blood sugar and it was 321. However, LVN C recorded 231 on Resident 17's Medication Administration Record (MAR) as Resident 17's blood sugar, and she administered 12 units of aspart insulin (used to treat high blood sugar) to Resident 17 instead of 16 units according to the sliding scale (a method used to determine the dose of insulin based on the blood sugar level just before the meal). During an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Two expired medications and 46 expired 8-oz boxes of renal supplement were made unavailable for resident use; and, 2. Two opened multi-dose eye medications were dated with an open and discard date (to ensure they were not used beyond the discard date). These failures had potential for residents to receive medications with reduced potency from being used past their discard date. Findings: 1. During an observation of medication cart #2 on 6/16/22 at 3:23 p.m., with the director of staff development (DSD), an 100 units/milliliter (ml, a metric unit of volume) insulin degludec (a long-acting insulin, medication to lower blood sugar level) pen (injection pen, prefilled with insulin degludec) for Resident 16 was found with an expiration date of 6/8/22. On 6/17/22 at 4:15 p.m., during an observation of medication cart #2 with licensed vocational nurse G (LVN G), Resident 16's insulin degludec pen with an expiration date of 6/8/22 was still in the cart. During an interview with the DSD on 6/20/22 at 10:46 a.m., the DSD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-20 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of Resident 35's notice of discharge to the Long Term Care Ombudsman. This failure had the potential of not providing Resident 35 with access to an advocate who could inform him of his options and rights and from being inappropriately discharged . Findings: Review of Resident 35's Discharge Summary indicated he was discharged on 4/8/22 to a boarding care facility since his functional status improved. During an interview with the manager of regulatory, quality assurance, and risk (MRQAR) on 6/20/22 at 5:34 p.m., she was unable to locate the record that indicated the Long Term Care Ombudsman was notified regarding Resident 35's discharge. The MRQAR stated she also confirmed with the skilled nursing facility manager (SNFM), and there was no notification to the Long Term Care Ombudsman found regarding Resident 35's discharge.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 12 residents (16) was free of a significant medication error when Resident 16 received insulin degludec (a long-acting insulin, medication to lower blood sugar level) nine times (doses) past the expiration date. This failure had the potential for ineffective use of the insulin (secondary to degraded potency of expired medication), resulting in uncontrolled high blood sugar for the resident. Findings: Review of Resident 16's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diabetes (a disease that occurs when the blood sugar is too high) diagnosis. On [DATE] at 3:23 p.m., during an observation of medication cart #2, with the director of staff development (DSD), an 100 units/milliliter (ml, a metric unit of volume) insulin degludec pen (injection pen, prefilled with insulin degludec) for Resident 16 was found with an expiration date of [DATE]. Review of Resident 16's Medication Administration Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-20 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — isolatedReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to notify residents' representatives and families of those residing in the facility by 5 p.m., the next calendar day following the occurrence of a confirmed infection of COVID-19 (a respiratory disease caused by a virus which can result in severe illness and death) and scabies (an intensely itchy skin condition that spreads quickly through close physical contact) for two of 12 residents (14 and 16). These failures had the potential to result in residents' representatives and families, not receiving timely notification regarding the status and impact of COVID-19 and scabies in the facility. Findings: 1. During an interview on 6/20/22 at 3:35 p.m., with the brother of Resident 14, he verified that he was not informed by the facility when there were cases of COVID-19 and scabies in the facility, last January, 2022. During an interview on 6/20/22 at 12:50 p.m., with the Manager of Regulatory, Quality Assurance and Risk (MRQAR), she confirmed that they did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BORZINI, ROGER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2008 |
| EWART, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2016 |
| HOWARD, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/01/2017 |
| OSMANI, FARAAZ | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/30/2017 |
| SALAMACHA, RENA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/13/2025 |
| EMERY-SHEA, EMILY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/02/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056443. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.