Freedom Village Healthcare Center
23442 El Toro Road, Lake Forest, CA 92630 · For profit - Partnership · 52 certified beds · (949) 472-0277 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.9% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.2% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.6% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
67.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 164 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 33.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.85 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 67.9%CMS range 60.9–72.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.5–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 33.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 4.2–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 40.1 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.86 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.32 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the food items inside the refrigerator used for the residents' food brought in from outside sources were properly labeled, discarded after use-by date, and the bins were cleaned. * The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was clean. * The facility failed to ensure the plate conveyor was free of accumulation of dirt. * The facility failed to air-dry the bin containing the scoops. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen.Findings: Review of the facility's document titled Census List dated 11/19/25, showed 38 of 38 residents in the facility received food prepared in the kitchen. 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Food Brought by Family/Visitors revised 11/16/24, showed the following:- Food brought by family/visitors that is left with the resident to consume later will be labeled, dated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to determine if it was safe to self-administer the medications left at the bedside for two of twelve final sampled residents (Resident 66 and 68). * Resident 66 had three tablets of Renvela (phosphate binder) in a medication cup at the bedside, and the resident was observed taking the Renvela medications by herself. However, Resident 66 was assessed to not be safe in self-administering medications. In addition, there were no physician's order and a care plan addressing the resident's self-administration of the medication. * Resident 68 was observed with a bottle of nasal spray at bedside. However, Resident 68 was assessed to not be safe in self-administering the medications. In addition, there were no physician's order and a care plan problem addressing the resident's self-administration of the medication. These failures had the potential for Residents 66 and 68 to administer the medications inaccurately and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary means to call the staff for assistance was provided for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 27). * The facility failed to ensure the call light was visible and within Resident 27's reach. This failure posed a risk for the delay of care/assistance when the resident is unable to call for help. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Call Light dated 11/16/24, showed to leave the resident comfortable and place the call device within resident's reach call cords clipped on the pillow/bed sheet) before leaving room. On 11/19/25 at 0910 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 27 was observed grimacing in bed. When asked how was she, Resident 27 responded, I'm shaking because I want to go to the bathroom, I don't know where my call light is. The staff was called for help, CNA 3 responded and assisted Resident 27. Upon transfer of Resident 27 from the bed to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the CDPH, L&C Program, Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and local law enforcement officials in a timely manner for one of one resident (final sampled resident, Resident 15) reviewed for an abuse allegation. * The facility failed to timely report the allegations of abuse to the CDPH L&C Program, Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and local law enforcement after the facility was made aware of an allegation of abuse made by Resident 15 against the facility staff. This failure had the potential for the delay of the alleged abused investigation and the facility to not take prompt and appropriate corrective actions to prevent further abuse.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse Policy and Procedure dated 3/1/24, showed the facility to maintain an environment free of abuse and neglect. Residents have the right to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, corporal punishment, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to one of one final sampled resident reviewed for allegation of abuse (Resident 15). * Resident 15's change in condition evaluation and monitoring was not completed and the physician was not notified of the allegation of the verbal and physical abuse from the staff. This failure had the potential for Resident 15 to not receive the necessary care and services to meet the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status dated 12/26/24, showed the facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. Further review of the P&P showed the nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been an accident or incident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain a safe water temperature levels in two of three rooms (Rooms A and C) tested for the water temperature. * The facility failed to ensure the water temperature in Rooms A and C were between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. In addition, when the facility conducted water temperature check, 12 of 27 rooms had sink water temperature of above 120 degrees Fahrenheit. This failure had the potential for the residents to sustain severe burn injury.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Water Temperatures, Safety dated 8/15/23, showed tap water in the facility shall be kept within a temperature range to prevent scalding of residents. Under the section for Policy Interpretation and Implementation showed following:- Water heaters that service resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, and tub/shower areas shall be set to temperatures of no more than 120 degrees F ( 48.88 degrees C), or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care services for one of two final sampled (Resident 4) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 61) reviewed for respiratory care. * The facility failed to administer the oxygen to Resident 4 as per the physician's order. *The facility failed to ensure the oxygen tubing was labeled for Resident 61. These failures had the potential for the residents to not receive the appropriate respiratory care, increased the risks of infection and affect the residents' well-being.Findings: 1. On 11/21/25 at 0809 and 0928 hours, Resident 4 was observed in bed receiving oxygen at a rate of two liters via nasal cannula. Medical record review for Resident 4 was initiated on 11/19/25. Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 4's physician's order dated 10/22/23, showed a physician's order to administer continuous oxygen at a rate of three liters per minute via nasal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate administration of the medications. One of four licensed nurses (LVN 3) observed during the medication administration was found to have two medication errors. The facility's medication error rate was 8%. * LVN 3 failed to administer Resident 2's metformin (antidiabetic medication) 500 mg as ordered by the physician. * LVN 3 failed to administer Resident 53's ferrous sulfate (supplement) 325 mg as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' health outcomes.Findings: Review of the facility's dining hours showed the residents' breakfast trays were scheduled to be served at 0715 hours daily. On 11/20/25 at 0905 hours, Resident 2 and 53's rooms were observed for breakfast trays in preparation for medication pass administration. There were no meal trays or any residents observed eating in these rooms. 1. On 11/20/25 at 1000…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, medical record review, and facility's P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services to ensure the proper storage, labeling, and disposal of medications. * A tube of Silicone Cream (a protective skin barrier which contains active medication ingredient to retain moisture and promote healing) was observed on the sink counter inside Resident 65's room. * The oral and non-oral medications were stored together inside the medication room. * The refrigerator inside the medication room was not kept clean. * Boxes of medical supplies were observed on the floor inside the medical supply storage room. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' health outcomes.Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Labeling and Storage (undated) showed the nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. On 11/19/25 at 0956 hours, during the initial tour of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections. * The facility failed to ensure the monthly infection surveillance documents showed if the residents' conditions met the McGeer's Criteria and if the residents listed in the surveillance log had HAI, CAI or suspected infection. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 4 was placed on EBP as per the physician's order. In addition, LVN 5 failed to perform hand hygiene before entering Resident 4's room. These failures had the potential to result in the spread of infection to the facility's vulnerable population. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Infection Control Surveillance Policy (undated) showed the facility to maintain an ongoing, facility-wide surveillance system that identified, tracks, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the antibiotics were not prescribed to one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 53) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 31) who did not meet McGeer's criteria in the surveillance log. * The facility failed to address the use of antibiotics when Resident 31 and 53's condition did not meet McGeer's criteria for true infection. This failure had the potential for the antibiotics to be used when it was not necessary and could result in the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Antibiotic Stewardship- Review and Surveillance dated 11/16/24, showed as a part of the facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program, all clinical infections treated with antibiotics will undergo review by the Infection Preventionist, or designee. The IP, or designee will review the antibiotic utilization as part of the antibiotic stewardship program and identify specific situation that are not consistent with appropriate use of antibiotics.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the education on the risks and benefits of the vaccinations were reviewed with the resident and/or resident representative for eight of 11 residents (Residents 5, 6, 7, 27, 39, 49, 51 and 54) reviewed for immunization. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 5, 27, 49, 51, and 54 were provided education on the risk and benefits when the residents declined pneumococcal vaccination. * The facility failed to ensure Residents 6 and 39 and/or their representative was offered the pneumococcal vaccine and were provided with education on the risk and benefits of pneumococcal vaccination. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 7 received education on the risk and benefits when resident declined the influenza vaccination. These failures had the potential for the residents and/or their representatives not being informed of influenza and pneumococcal vaccine, the benefits and risks of influenza and pneumococcal vaccination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-26 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of 11 Residents (final sampled residents, Residents 7 and 27) reviewed for immunization were offered the COVID-19 seasonal vaccine. This failure posed the residents at risk for increased risk for infection and transmission of COVID-19.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Immunization dated 11/16/24, showed the facility is to offer Influenza, Pneumococcal and COVD-19 Vaccine to residents and staff, in accordance with CDC, CDPH, CAL-OSHA regulations, and recommendations to reduce mortality and morbidity. Under the section procedure showed facility will offer Influenza, Pneumococcal and COVID- 19 vaccines to residents, staff, as scheduled and as needed. Further review of the P&P showed the residents and staff will be informed regarding the risk and benefits and potential side effects associated with the vaccine. 1. Medical record review for Resident 7 was initiated on 11/21/25. Resident 7 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 3) received the appropriate services needed to maintain optimal nutritional status. * The facility failed to timely notify Resident 3's physician of the RD recommendations when Resident 3 had a weight loss of 6 pounds in six days. This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive the necessary care and intervention timely to maintain the resident's nutrition status and/or prevent further weight loss.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Weight Management (undated) showed the residents' weights are monitored for undesirable or unintended weight loss or gain. Undesirable weight change is evaluated by the treatment team whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met. The physician and multidisciplinary team identify conditions and medications that may be causing anorexia, weight loss or increasing the risk of weight loss. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to follow the abuse protocol during the facility investigation period for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to suspend CNAs 2 and 3 from work when Resident 1 reported an allegation of physical abuse against these two CNAs on 11/10/24. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 and other residents at risk of not being protected against the alleged abusers. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Abuse Policy and Procedure revised 3/1/24, showed during and after the investigation, the residents will be protected from the alleged harm through the following methods: - staff will closely and frequently supervise the resident, and - if a staff member is accused or suspected of abuse, that staff member will be suspended pending the completion of the investigation. On 11/12/24, the CDPH, Licensing and Certification Program received a report from the facility regarding Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) attained and/or maintained her highest practicable physical well-being. * The facility failed to monitor Resident 1's safety and psychosocial wellbeing and developed a care plan after Resident 1 had reported an abuse allegation on 11/10/24. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive the necessary care and services. Findings: On 11/12/24, the CDPH, Licensing and Certification Program received a report from the facility regarding Resident 1's allegation of physical abuse by CNAs 2 and 3 on 11/10/24. Medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 11/26/24. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's Progress Note dated 11/10/24, showed Resident 1 alleged two CNAs were changing her diaper and being rough with care. The note also showed the CNAs were laughing at her. Further review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation requirements were met in the kitchen when: * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen utensils and equipment were stored or kept in sanitary conditions. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment were cleaned properly. * The facility failed to ensure a juice machine had an air gap for back flow prevention. These failures had the potential to pose the risk for exposure to food-borne illnesses in a medically vulnerable population of 42 residents received food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's matrix showed 42 residents consumed food prepared in the facility's kitchen. 1. According to the USDA Food Code 2022, Section 4-101.11, Multiuse, Characteristics, for materials that are used in the construction of utensils and food contact surfaces of equipment may not allow the migration of deleterious substances or impart colors, odors, or tastes to food and under normal use conditions shall be safe, durable, corrosion-resistant,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure whether it was safe to self-administer the medications for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 24). * Resident 24 was observed to have two Voltaren (topical pain medication) gel tubes at bedside. Resident 24 did not have the physician's order or care plan problem addressing the self-administration of medications. This failure had the potential for Resident 24 to administer the medications inaccurately. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Administration of Medications revised 6/5/24, showed the facility should comply with facility policy, applicable law, and the State Operations Manual with respect to resident self-administration of medications. Facility, in conjunction, with the interdisciplinary care team, should assess and determine, with respect to each resident, whether self-administration of medications is safe and clinically appropriate, based on the resident's functionality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P, the facility failed to ensure the advance directive information was documented and/or the information on how to formulate an advance directive was offered to three of 14 final sampled residents (Residents 22, 24, and 25). * The facility failed to ensure the copies of the advance directives were obtained and placed in the medical records for Residents 22 and 24. * The facility failed to ensure the POLST for Resident 25 was updated to show the advance directive was formulated. These failures had the potential for the facility to provide the treatments and services against the residents' wishes. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Advance Directive revised 11/16/23, showed the following: - Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so; - Information about whether or not the resident has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNOC) after the termination Medicare Part A services for two nonsampled residents (Resident 45 and 47). This failure had the potential for violating the residents' rights to be informed of changes for coverage. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 45's admission Record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and the last covered day of Medicare Part A Services was on 8/3/24. Review of Resident 45's SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review dated 5/17/24, showed the resident's representative was notified regarding the resident's last covered Medicare day. However, the representative was provided copy of the CMS 20052 SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review as the ABN (Advance Beneficiary Notification). 2. Review of Resident 47's admission Record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]; and the last covered day of Medicare Part A Services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the staff implemented two-person assist for transfers one of two final sampled residents (Resident 18) as per the plan of care, resulting the right ankle fracture treated with the right ankle splint. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's well-being. Findings: Medical record review of Resident 18 was initiated on 10/21/24. Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 18's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], showed under section GG (Functional Abilities and Goal), sit to lying, sit to stand, chair/bed to chair transfer was coded as substantial or maximal assistance. Review of Resident 18's care plan dated 9/5/24, showed a problem of activity daily living self-care performance deficits related to impaired mobility as manifested by having generalized weakness/deconditioning/debility. The interventions included to require two persons assist for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the timely intervention for one of three final sampled residents (Resident 22) reviewed for weight loss. * Resident 22 experienced a 5.32% weight loss in one month. There was no assessment from nutritional services, RD intervention, care plan, and notification to the MD and family regarding the weight loss. This failure had the potential to result in continued nutritional decline and negative outcomes. Findings: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11 dated 10/2023 showed if a resident is losing a significant amount of weight, the facility should not wait for the 30- or 180-day timeframe to address the problem. Weight changes of 5% in 1 month, 7.5% in 3 months, or 10% in 6 months should prompt a thorough assessment of the resident's nutritional status. Review the facility's P&P titled Weight Management Guidelines revised 2/2022 showed a weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate reconciliation and disposal of medications. * The facility failed to ensure the count performed for all controlled medications in the Omnicell (automatic drug delivery system) as per the facility's P&P. This failure posed the risk for diversion of medications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Automatic Drug Delivery Systems (ADDS) CA- Omnicare revised 2022 showed the following: - The Pharmacy tracks the AADS and generates complete and accurate user records of all transactions including all medications and other inventory added to or removed from the ADDS. - Authorized facility shall count each controlled substance and verify their count against the count according to the ADDS system. - The two authorized facility stall will each sign the ADDS daily temperature and cycle count log after the cycle count is completed. On 10/23/24 at 1620 hours, and interview was conducted with Pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one nonsampled resident (Resident 12) was properly monitored for the stool softener medications. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's health condition. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration revised 11/16/23, showed the following: - The facility policy regarding medication administration in accordance with Applicable law and the State Operations Manual when administering medications. - The licensed nurse should confirm the MAR reflects the most recent medication order. Medical record review for Resident 12 was initiated on 10/21/24. Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 12's Order Summary Report dated 9/29/24, showed Colace 100 mg (stool softener) one capsule by mouth two times a day for bowel management and to hold for loose stool. On 10/22/24 at 0916 hours, a medication administration observation of Resident 12 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of five final sampled residents (Resident 25) reviewed for unnecessary medications was free from the unnecessary psychotropic medications (medication that affects the mind, emotions, and behavior). This failure had the potential for Resident 25 to have adverse complications from the medication. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Antipsychotic Medication and Informed Consent Policy updated June 2024 showed antipsychotic medications may be considered for residents with dementia but only after medical, physical, functional, psychological, emotional psychiatric, social and environmental causes of behavior symptoms have been identified and addressed. The policy interpretation and implementation include among others the following: - The attending physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify a resident's behavior, mood function, medical condition,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed ensure proper storage and label of medications in Medication Cart 1 and medication storage room when: * Resident 7's eye drop medication in Medication Cart 1 was not kept in the refrigerator as per the medication instruction. * Resident 22's cough medication was stored with the topical ointment medication in Medication Cart 1. * Resident 686's inhalation medication in Medication Cart 1 was not labeled with an opened date as per the facility's policy . * The bottom drawer of Medication Cart 1 was not kept clean and free from spill residue. * The expired medication was stored in the medication storage room. In addtion, the licensed nurse left the medications for Resident 27 unattended while performed other tasks. These failures had the potential for the medications misuse, medication ineffectiveness, and potential exposure to harmful pathogens (bacteria, viruses, fungi) from expired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0801 — isolatedEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the DSS who was responsible to oversee the satellite kitchen which produced food for the skilled nursing facility was qualified in managing the day-to-day functions of the food services department. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the health and well-being of 42 residents who received the food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's matrix showed 42 residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. According to the California Code, Health, and Safety Code - HSC § 1265.4, a licensed health facility shall employ a full-time, part-time, or consulting dietitian. A health facility that employs a registered dietitian less than full time, shall also employ a full-time dietetic services supervisor who meets the requirements of subdivision (b) to supervise dietetic service operations. On 10/23/24 at 0802 hours, an interview was conducted with the DSS. The DSS stated she was responsible to manage the SNF satellite kitchen. The DSS stated the food for the SNF residents was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the food allergy item was not served to one of 14 final sampled Residents (Resident 27). This failure had the potential for the resident's medical complication. Findings: Medical record review of Resident 27 was initiated on 10/21/24. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident 27 Dietary Communication dated 4/12/24, showed the resident had allergies to cucumber. On 10/21/24 at 1210 hours, Resident 27 was observed eating his lunch independently and was served cucumber in his main plate. On 10/21/24 at 1230 hours, an interview and concurrent diet card review was conducted with the Dietary Service Supervisor. The DSS was asked if the resident had allergies to cucumber. The DSS stated yes and asked why the resident was served with the cucumber. The DSS stated, I will replace it now. The DSS verified the findings. On 10/24/24 at 1457 hours, an interview was conducted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the education was provided to the staff and family/visitors on safe food handling of outside food. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses to the medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food brought from outside sources. Findings: Review of CMS S&C-09-39 dated 5/29/09, showed the residents have the right to choose to accept food from visitors, family, friends, or other guests according to their rights to make choices. The CMS guideline further showed the facility has the responsibility under the food safety regulation to help the visitors to understand safe food handling practices such as not holding or transporting foods containing perishable ingredients at temperatures above 41 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of the facility's P&P titled Foods Brought by Family/Visitors revised 11/16/21, showed the food brought by the visitors and family is permitted. The facility staff will strive to balance resident choice and a homelike environment with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 22) reviewed for hospice services. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 22 received hospice aide visit one time per week as ordered by the physician. * The facility failed to ensure the hospice log showed documentation regarding the CHHA visit. * The facility failed to ensure the hospice RN was included in Resident 22's Care Conference/Care Plan Meeting on 9/27/24. These failures had the potential for not providing necessary care and services to the resident recievieng hospice services. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Hospice Services revised 11/16/24, showed the following: - Hospice providers who contract with this facility are held responsible for meeting the same professional standards and timelines of service as any contracted individual or agency associated with the facility. - In general, it is the responsibility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to ensure the QA committee identified and developed action plans to address the focused areas from the last recertification survey. The QA committee failed to have documented evidence to show they identified and developed action plan to correct the identified concern of the respiratory care and medication storage. This failure had the potential to result in residents at risk for possible infection and causing adverse side effects for expired medication. Findings: Review of the facility's previous recertification survey completed on [DATE], showed the following deficient practices were cited: respiratory care (F695) and medication storage (F761). These deficient practices were the repeated deficient practices cited during this Recertification Survey. During the QAA interview with the Administrator and DON on [DATE] at 1320 hours, the DON was asked how the QAA committee identified current and ongoing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infection when: * The facility failed to maintain the accurate infection surveillance program for September and October 2024. * The facility failed to ensure the infection control practices were implemented in the facility's laundry room. * The facility failed to ensure the licensed nurse (LVN 1) performed hand hygiene in between changing gloves during the medication administration observation for Resident 27. * The facility failed to ensure Foley catheter care for Resident 686 was done in the safe and sanitary manner. These failures posed the risk for not identifying the residents' infections and thereby, preventing the implementation of interventions to control the potential transmission of communicable diseases to other residents in the facility. In addition, these failures posed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, facility document, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the antibiotic stewardship program. * The facility failed to ensure the appropriate use of antibiotics for one final sampled resident (Resident 25) and two nonsampled residents (Residents 9 and 20). This failure had the potential for inappropriate use and increased risk of drug resistant organisms. Findings: According to the CDC, the antibiotics are among the most frequently prescribed medications in nursing homes, with up to 70% of residents in a nursing home receiving one or more courses of systemic antibiotics over a year. Studies have shown that 40-75% of antibiotics prescribed in nursing homes may be unnecessary or inappropriate. Harms from antibiotic overuse are significant for the frail and older adults receiving care in nursing homes. These harms include risk of serious diarrheal infections from Clostridium difficile, increased adverse drug events and drug interactions, and colonization and/or infection with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and the facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure two of 14 final sampled residents (Residents 4 and 25) were offered the influenza vaccine (vaccine given to protect the resident from influenza disease) and pneumococcal vaccine (a vaccine given to protect the resident from pneumococcal disease) when the residents were eligible to receive in accordance with the current CDC's guidelines and recommendations. This posed the risk of Residents 4 and 25 acquiring influenza and pneumonia. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Immunization revised 11/16/23, showed immunization policy is to offer influenza and pneumococcal to residents and staff, in accordance with CDC and CDPH regulations and recommendations to reduce mortality and morbidity. Under the Procedure section, the residents and staff will be informed regarding the risks and benefits and potential side effects associated with the vaccine. 1. Medical record review for Resident 4 was initiated on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, facility document review, and facility' P&P review, the facility failed to maintain the safe operating conditions. * The facility failed to maintain the essential temperature logs for the safe operating conditions of the Omnicell Anatomic Drug Dispensing system. This failure had the potential for the equipment to not function in the way intended, which could negatively affect the residents' medications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes, and Needles revised 8/01/24, showed the facility should ensure that medications and biologicals are stored at their appropriate temperatures according to the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) guidelines for temperature ranges and manufacturer guidance. -Facility should monitor the temperature of medication storage areas at least once a day. Review of the facility's P&P titled Automated Drug Delivery System (ADDS) CA-Omnicare revised 2020 showed the following: -The facility shall maintain the ADDS Daily Temperature and Cycle Count Log. -The two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were met in the kitchen. * The facility failed to ensure the expired food items in the walk-in refrigerator and dry storage area were discarded. * The facility failed to ensure the labeling and dating of foods in the kitchen and refrigerator used for the residents' food brought in by the visitors were proper. * The facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment was clean. * The facility failed to ensure the resident dishware and utensils had a smooth cleanable surface. * The facility failed to ensure the sanitizer test strips had not expired. * The facility failed to ensure the backflow prevention of one air gap was properly maintained. These failures had the potential to cause the foodborne illnesses in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the CMS 672 Resident Census and Conditions of Residents completed by the facility dated 2/7/23, showed 32 of 32 residents in the facility received food prepared in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility P&P review, and facility document review, the facility failed to maintain the infection control program designed to provide the safe environment and reduce the risk of development of illnesses and transmission of diseases. * The facility failed to show documentation of the Legionella (a bacteria that can cause a serious type of lung infection) facility risk assessment and testing protocols. * The facility failed to implement proper hand hygiene and changing gloves during wound care. * The facility failed to ensure a confirmed COVID-19 case was assessed every four hours for respiratory rates, temperatures, and oxygen saturation levels as per the facility's P&P for Resident 25. * LVN 2 failed to disinfect the self-sealing stopper top of the insulin (medication to lower blood sugar) vial prior to withdrawing the medication. This posed a risk for increased infection. These failures had the potential to result in the transmission of infection to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-10 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly care conference was conducted for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 14). * Resident 14's last quarterly care conference was conducted on 9/20/22. The residents' care conferences were scheduled on a quarterly basis. However, there was no documentation of any other care conferences conducted for Resident 14 after 9/20/22. This posed the risk of violating the rights of Resident 14 and/or responsible party to participate in choosing the treatment options and making the decisions in care planning. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plan Meetings dated 11/2022 showed the Social Worker will schedule the care plan meetings. The resident, resident's family, and/or resident's legal representative/guardian or surrogate are encouraged to attend the scheduled quarterly care plan meetings. Medical record review for Resident 14 was initiated on 2/8/23. Resident 14 was admitted on [DATE], and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one nonsampled resident (Resident 736) who could not safely self-administer medications had the medication at the bedside. This failure had the potential for Resident 736 to administer medications inaccurately. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Omnicare 2.1 Self Administering Medications revised 5/2010 showed the facility, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Team, should assess and determine, with respect to each resident, whether self-administration of medications is safe and appropriate. On 2/7/23 at 0949 hours, two packets of unopened hydrocortisone cream 1% (a medicated cream used to reduce inflammation of the skin) were seen on the bedside table of Resident 736. When asked what the medication cream was for, Resident 736 stated she did not know why it was there. On 2/7/23 at 1014 hours, a concurrent interview and observation was conducted with LVN 1. When asked about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-10 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (a person who routinely visits the facility and advocated for the residents) was notified of the discharge for one of three closed record sampled residents (Resident 28). This failure had the potential of not providing Resident 74 with access to an advocate who could inform them of their options and rights related to discharge. Findings: Closed medical record review for Resident 28 was initiated on 2/9/23. Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 2/1/23. Review of the facility's document titled Notice of Transfer and Discharge with effective discharge date of 2/1/23, failed to show the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of Resident 28's discharge to home. On 2/9/23 at 1245 hours, an interview and concurrent facility document review was conducted with the SSD. The SSD was asked if the facility had notified the Long-Term Care Ombudsman of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide an individualized and ongoing activity program to meet the needs and interests of one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 2) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 11). * The facility failed to provide activities for Residents 2 and 11 to meet the resident's identified interests. The facility failed to ensure the TV remote controls were provided for Residents 2 and 11. This had the potential for the residents to experience feelings of social isolation and frustration. Findings: 1. On 2/7/23 at 0948 hours, Resident 2 was observed in bed and awake. There was no in-room sensory stimulation observed. The TV was observed turned off. On 2/8/23 at 0853 hours, Resident 2 was observed in bed and awake. Resident 2 was observed staring at the window. There was no in-room sensory stimulation observed. The TV was observed turned off. When asked if she wanted to watch TV, Resident 2 nodded her head and said yes. On 2/8/23 at 0856…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 10) on hospice services attained and maintained their highest practicable well-being. * The facility failed to communicate with the hospice agency regarding the RN/ LVN and CHHA visitation when Resident 10 was in isolation for Covid-19. This had the potential of a delay in hospice care regarding changes in Resident 10's condition. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 10 was initiated on 2/7/23. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 7/20/22, for Resident 10 to be admitted to hospice services under routine level of care. Review of the hospice calendar for January and February 2023 showed the RN/LVN was scheduled to visit two times per week, and the CHHA was scheduled to visit three times per week. Further review of the hospice calendar showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-10 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 10) who required hearing aids received proper treatment and assistive device to maintain her hearing abilities. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 10's hearing aids were applied as ordered by the physician. This had the potential for the resident's communication to be impaired by not being to hear conversations clearly. Findings: On 2/7/23 at 1008 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 10 was observed awake in bed. When Resident 10 was greeted, she did not respond but cupped her hand behind her ear and moved her head closer. When asked if she had hearing aids on or needed her hearing aids on, Resident 10 answered, it would probably make it better. Medical record review for Resident 10 was initiated on 2/7/23. Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 10's MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 19 was able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services related to pressure injuries (areas of damaged skin caused by staying in one position for a long time which reduces blood flow to the area and causes the skin to die and develop a sore to promote wound healing) were provided to one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 17). * The facility failed to ensure the low air loss mattress setting was consistently monitored to ensure the appropriate settings of the low air loss mattress for Resident 17. This failure posed the risk for complications and delayed wound healing. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Skin Integrity/Prevention of Pressure Injuries revised 11/16/22, showed the policy is to identify and reduce risk factors for the development of pressure injuries. The treatment nurse and Medical practitioner will review the interventions and treatment for effectiveness on an on-going basis. Medical Record Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 538). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 538's nasal cannula tubing (medical device use to deliver supplemental oxygen) was dated. This had the potential for increased risks of infection. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 538 was initiated on 2/7/23. Resident 538 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should). Review of the Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 1/31/23, to provide oxygen at two liters per minute via nasal cannula every shift and change oxygen tubing and humidifier every Sunday. On 2/7/23 at 1009 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, an observation of Resident 538 was conducted. Resident 538 was observed in bed receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary pharmacy services for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 12) and two nonsampled residents (Residents 7 and 18). * Resident 18's hydrocodone-acetaminophen (a narcotic pain medication) Controlled Drug Record documentation did not match Resident 18's MAR. This failure posed the risk of diversion of the controlled medication. * Resident 12's chewable aspirin medication (medication used to lower the chance of heart attack) was administered without the instructions for the resident to chew, and the resident swallowed the aspirin tablet. This posed the risk of decreased absorption of Resident 12's medication. * Resident 7's ferrous sulfate (iron supplement) and calcium (calcium supplement) were administered at the same time. This posed the risk of decreased absorption of Resident 7's ferrous sulfate. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Medication Administration revised date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure four of 14 final sampled residents (Residents 2, 21, 30, and 537) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (medication that affects the brain activity). * The facility failed to provide the physician's documentation to extend Resident 30's Xanax medication (psychotropic medication) after 14 days of PRN use and the facility failed to provide a stop date on Resident 30's PRN Xanax ordered on 1/29/23. * The facility failed to provide the non-pharmacological interventions to Resident 21's depression, anxiety, and poor intakes to minimize the use of alprazolam, mirtazapine, and escitalopram medications (psychotropic medications). * The facility failed to accurately document Resident 21's monthly behavior tracking for mirtazapine use. * The facility failed to provide the non-pharmacological interventions to Resident 2's depression to minimize the citalopram use. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 537's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to store the medication and supplies according to the manufacturer's recommendations. * Medication Cart 2 had Resident 16's Novolin R FlexPen insulin injection (medication used to lower blood sugar) with an opened date of 12/29/22, and labeled to expire on 1/27/23. This failure had the potential for the administration of deteriorated medication. * Medication Cart 3 had the expired IV supplies. This had the potential for use of expired supplies. * The facility failed to store the A&D ointment securely and inaccessible by the residents and visitors. This had the potential for unauthorized access to the medication. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Storge and Expiration of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes and Needles revised 4/1/22, showed the facility should ensure that medications and biologicals for expired or discharged residents are store separately, away from use, until destroyed or returned to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-10 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to provide the rehabilitation services for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 30). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 30 was provided RNA services for ambulation when Resident 30 was in isolation for Covid-19. This failure had the potential for Resident 30 to decline in the resident's range of motion and mobility. Findings: On 2/7/23 at 1124 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, an interview was conducted with Resident 30. Resident 30 stated she was supposed to walk, but it was stopped while she was in isolation for Covid-19. Resident 30 stated she was out of the isolation for Covid-19 on Thursday, and the staff started to walk her again. Resident 30 stated she felt she was relearning to walk again. Medical record review for Resident 30 was initiated on 2/7/23. Resident 30 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 30 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate medical records for one of four sampled residents (Resident 3). * Resident 3's neurological assessments were incomplete. This failures resulted in medical records that contained incomplete or inaccurate information, which could negatively impact the continuity of care.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Fall Incident Management and Intervention dated November 2025 showed neurological checks will be initiated for any unwitnessed fall and / or head related incident. Medical record review for Resident 3 was initiated on 6/2/26. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 3's Progress Notes dated 5/26/26, showed at 0730 hours the staff found Resident 3 sitting on the floor, leaning on the bed. Resident 3's progress notes showed neurological monitoring was initiated for 72 hours. Review of Resident 3's Neuro Checks sheet initiated 5/26/26, showed neurological…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-11-26 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility documentation review, the facility failed to ensure seven of seven residents (final sampled Residents 4, 45, and 68; and nonsampled Residents 28, 35, 39, and 62) present in the residents' council meeting were provided with the required information. * Residents 4, 28, 35, 39, 45, 62, and 68 were not informed on how to contact the local State agency. This failure posed the risk of the residents not being able to file a complaint directly to the local State Agency.Findings: On 11/20/25 at 1000 hours, a residents' council meeting was held with a total of seven residents. When asked if they knew how to contact their local State agency if they needed to file complaints, Residents 4, 28, 35, 39, 45, 62, and 68 stated they did not know how to contact their local State agency. On 11/20/25 at 1100 hours, a concurrent observation, interview, and review of the facility's resident council minutes was conducted with the Activities Director. When asked how she informed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-11-26 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary transfer/discharge services was completed one of two closed record sampled residents (Resident 58). * The facility failed to ensure the LTC Ombudsman was made aware when Resident 58 was discharged from the facility. This posed the risk of the LTC Ombudsman not being aware of the circumstances should an appeal be filed by the resident or her representative regarding the transfer/discharge, and the risk of the resident or their representative not being aware of their rights prior to the transfer/discharge from the facility.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 58 was initiated on 12/3/25. Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was transferred to the acute care hospital on 9/21/25. Review of Resident 58's Notice of Transfer/discharge date d 9/21/25, showed Resident 58 was discharged to the acute care hospital, and the box showing a copy was sent to the LTC Ombudsman was checked. On 11/25/25 at 0849…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record for two of twelve final sampled residents (Residents 7 and 27) were accurate. * The Skilled Nursing Assessments for Residents 7 and 27 failed to show documentation the residents were receiving nebulizer treatment. This failure had the potential for Resident 7 and 27's care needs not being met as the medical record was inaccurate.Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 7 was initiated on 11/24/25. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 7's H&P examination dated 9/23/25, showed Resident 7 could make own medical needs known. Review of Resident 7's Order Summary Report dated 11/24/24, showed a physician's order dated 9/23/25, for Ipratropium-Albuterol (medication to treat wheezing, shortness of breath) Inhalation Solution 0.5 - 2.5 (3) mg/3 ml to inhale 3 ml orally via nebulizer (treatment using fine mist that is inhaled into the lungs through a mouthpiece or mask) every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurate for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure posed the risk for Resident 1 to not receive the accurate and necessary care. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Fall Incident Management and Intervention revised 10/2024 showed in part, it is the policy .to promote resident's safety and prevent injury. The procedure section showed, fall risk assessment and care plans updated for all residents at risk for falling and/or residents that have fallen more than once. Review of the facility's P&P titled Charting and Documentation revised 11/2023 showed all services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional, or psychosocial condition shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The policy interpretation and implementation section showed documentation in the medical record will be objective, complete,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 22) and one nonsampled resident ( Resident 17) reviewed for respiratory care were provided with the appropriate respiratory services. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 17's nasal cannula was stored in a sanitary manner when not in use. *The facility failed to ensure Resident 22's nasal cannula tubing and respiratory storage bag were dated. These failures had the potential to affect the respiratory health and well-being of the residents received respiratory care in the facility. Findings: 1. Medical record review for Resident 17 was initiated on 10/21/24. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 17's Order Summary Report dated 10/24/24, showed a physician's order dated 5/29/24, to administer oxygen two liters per minute via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath and oxygen saturation level less than 90%. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-10-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the main menus were followed for 42 of 42 residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. This failure had the potential for the residents to not receive the menus as planned. Findings: Review of the facility's matrix showed 42 residents consumed food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Review of the facility's P&P titled Menu Alternatives dated 2018 showed the Director of Food and Nutrition Services is responsible for supervising meal preparation and service to ensure the menu is followed and served as planned. Residents/patients who do not like the menu entrée will be given the menu alternative. Review of the facility's document titled Daily Spreadsheet Tuesday Day 17, showed the following items were to be served for the lunch main menu on 10/22/24: - Burgundy Beef Tenderloin Tips - Parslied Noodles - Seasoned Spinach - Choice of Bread - Margarine Review of the facility's document titled Daily Spreadsheet Tuesday Day 17, showed the following items served for lunch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRINGER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/01/2009 |
| DEBBAN, SUSAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/26/1989 |
| FRANCESE, ARSENIO | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/1986 |
| MANGIARACINA, EMILY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2022 |
| MURPHY, TIMOTHY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/05/2020 |
| ROSKAMP, ROBERT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/26/1989 |
| ROSKAMP, RUTH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/26/1989 |
| ROSKAMP, STEVEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2022 |
| STRINGER, THOMAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/26/1989 |
| WADE, RICHARD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/26/1989 |
| ROSKAMP, CHERYL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/1986 |
| SUCKIEL, JENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/15/2019 |
| FREEDOM MANAGEMENT CO LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/07/2025 |
| BEKERIAN, HRAG | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/27/2024 |
| FREEDOM PROPERTIES WEST LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/01/1986 |
| HEMET RETIREMENT PROPERTIES WEST, LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/31/2024 |
| QUANTUM BASICS II, LLC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 01/05/2020 |
| TARAYAN INC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/26/1989 |
| TABATABAI, ALI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $466K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555391. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.