No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kern Valley Healthcare District DP SNF

6412 Laurel Ave, Lake Isabella, CA 93240 · Government - Hospital district · 74 certified beds · (760) 379-2681 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (760) 379-2681 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 20252 actual-harm citations$31,581 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $31,581 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-27)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6310 Lake Isabella Blvd · (760) 379-2415 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
12608 Mountain Mesa Rd · (760) 379-6106 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
12324 Mountain Mesa Rd · (760) 379-2867 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4308 Birch St · (760) 812-0719 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
6400 Dogwood Ave · (760) 379-4792

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.2%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.9%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.3%13.7%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.4%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.3%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.2%12.0%17.1%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.372.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.041.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.18
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.36
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.38
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.15
RN hoursweekends
32.6%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 55.7 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-23)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, recognize, escalate and properly respond to an emergency involving one of seven sampled residents (Resident 7) who experienced a physical change of condition (a significant change in a person's health, caregiver support, or functional status that will not usually resolve without further intervention). This failure resulted in a delay in transferring Resident 7 to the hospital for a higher level of care, resulted in a delay in treatment for a Cerebral Infarction (also known as a stroke, it is when blood flow to the brain is stopped, which can result in slurred speech, movement difficulties to one or both sides of the body, numbness, confusion, headache), and an intracranial hemorrhage (type of stroke that causes bleeding in the head), which resulted in Resident 7's functional decline in mobility, decline in ability to feed self, decline in ability to provide self with oral care, decline in ability to toilet self, decline in ability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P&P) on ELOPEMENT (when a resident leaves the facility without the knowledge of the staff)/WANDERING (moving from place to place without a fixed plan) to evaluate for elopement, initiate a care plan (document that outlines the specific needs, goals, and interventions for a resident) and notify the physician for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who expressed and attempted to leave the facility. These failures resulted in Resident 1 eloping and sustaining a fall outside of the facility which resulted in a fracture (a partial or complete break of the bone) to the left hip requiring surgical intervention. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission RECORD (AR), dated 11/7/24, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 diagnoses including muscle weakness, anxiety (feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness) and bipolar disorder (mental disorder where the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policies and procedures (P&P) titled, Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, for all residents when a Registered Nurse (RN) was not present in the facility for eight working hours. This failure had the potential for residents needs to go unmet.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/22/26 at 10:59 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), the facility's Total Skilled Nursing Hours (TSNH), dated October 2025 and December 2025 was reviewed. The following dates indicated:On 10/26/25 Census 52 residents, and 0 RN hours.On 10/30/25 Census 52 residents, and 0 RN hours.On 12/29/25 Census 55 residents, and 0 RN hours.On 12/30/25 Census 55 residents, and 0 RN hours.DON stated the facility did not have a RN covering the floor on those dates.During an interview on 4/22/26 at 11:10 a.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), ADON stated in October they did not have a RN on 10/26/25 or 10/30/25.During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, dated 7/28/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement effective infection control practices when:Facility staff did not provide hand hygiene to three of five sampled residents (Resident 26, Resident 30, and Resident 15). This failure had the potential to spread infection to residents. Housekeeping staff did not follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - gown and gloves are used during care of residents with indwelling medical devices and open wounds, to prevent infection) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 6) when cleaning Resident 6's room. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 6 developing an infection. Findings: 1. During an observation on 4/20/26 at 12:26 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 in Resident 26's room, CNA 3, delivered a lunch tray to Resident 26. During an observation on 4/20/26 at 12: 29 p.m. with CNA 4, in Resident 30's room, CNA 4 delivered and set up Resident 30 's lunch tray by cutting up meat on lunch plate. During an observation and interview on 4/20/26 at 12:36 p.m. with Resident 30 in Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its Policy and Procedure (P&P) tiled, Medication Storage, for one of one medication cart when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, left the medication cart unlocked in the hallway. This failure had the potential for accidental ingestion of medication by a wondering resident.Findings:During an observation on 4/21/26 at 11:39 a.m. with LVN 1 in the hallway during medication pass, there was unattended blood sugar supplies (including lancets [small needle], diabetic test strips, testing solutions and glucometer) on top of a medication cart that was left unlocked.During an observation on 4/21/26 at 11:51 a.m. with LVN 1 in hallway outside Resident 6's room during medication pass. there were unattended blood sugar supplies and the medication cart was left unlocked. During an interview on 4/21/26 at 11:53 a.m. with LVN 1, LVN 1 stated normally when he walked away, he would lock the medication cart.During an interview on 4/21/26 at 11:55 a.m. with LVN 2, LVN 2 stated yes, she did see LVN 1 did not lock the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled housekeeping carts (Cart 1 and Cart 2) were secured and cleaning chemicals were not accessible by residents. These failures had the potential to result in residents accessing the cleaning chemicals causing injury or death.Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/22/26 at 9:43 a.m. with Housekeeper (HK) 1 by Cart 1, Cart 1 had an open bucket on the outside of the cart that was half full of clear liquid. HK 1 used a measuring container to dip the liquid from the bucket and poured it into the mop handle, then placed the container back into the bucket. A small bucket was on top of the cart half full of clear liquid. A pocket on the side of the cart contained two containers, one labeled Super Sani Cloth [cleaning chemical], and one labeled Sani Cloth Bleach [cleaning chemical]. HK 1 stated the smaller bucket contained a cleaning chemical used to wipe down the resident rooms. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/22/26 at 10:03 a.m. with HK 2 by Cart 2, Cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    During an observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two cooks (Cook 2) followed the Hair and beard Restraint policy and procedures (P&P), when [NAME] 2 did not have a beard cover. This failure had the potential for food contamination.Findings: During an observation on 4/21/26 at 10:45 a.m. in the kitchen, [NAME] 2 had a full beard on his face. [NAME] 2 was cutting up strawberries and was not wearing a beard cover. During an interview on 4/21/26 at 10:47 a.m. with [NAME] 2, [NAME] 2 stated he should use a beard cover while in the kitchen. During an interview on 4/21/26 at 10:51 a.m. with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) in the kitchen, CDM stated she did not know why [NAME] 2 was not wearing a beard cover and stated he should have been. During a review of the facility's P&P titled, Hair and [NAME] Restraint' dated 2020, the P&P indicated, Hair and beard restraints are designed and worn to effectively keep hair from contacting food, clean equipment and utensils. Staff entering and working in the kitchen must wear a hair and beard restraint.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders (PO) to monitor oxygen saturation (O2 Sat- a measurement of how much oxygen your blood is carrying as a percentage of the maximum it could carry) was followed for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive the appropriate oxygenation that is required to maintain the parameters the physician ordered. Findings:During an observation on 4/20/26 at 10:50 a.m. in Resident 1's room. Resident 1 was not receiving oxygen (a colorless and odorless gas that is essential for life) while lying in her bed.During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/20/26 at 3:11 p.m. with Resident 1 in Resident 1's room, an oxygen concentrator (a medical device that delivers oxygen in short bursts upon inhalation) was seen in Resident 1's room. Resident 1 was not using her nasal cannula (a flexible tube put in the nostrils to deliver supplemental oxygen to a patient). Resident 1 stated she did not need the oxygen machine in her room.During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P), titled Foods Brought in by Family or Visitors, when a designated refrigerator was not provided for resident's food that is brought in by family. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk of foodborne illness due to unmonitored food brought in by the family and could limit food choices and options for residents. Findings: During an interview on 4/23/26 at 8:42 a.m. in the staff breakroom with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 was asked if residents were allowed or able to have food brought in to the facility from their family. CNA 1 stated she was new and stated she believed residents were able to receive food from visitors or family. CNA 1 stated she was not aware of the process or where to store the residents food brought in from family. During an interview on 4/23/26 at 8:46 a.m. in the activities room with CNA 2, CNA 2 was asked if residents were allowed or able to have food brought in to the facility from their family. CNA 2 stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a policy and procedure (P&P) for smoking for one of one resident (Resident 45). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 45 being unsafe while smoking and injury of Resident 45 and other residents.Findings: During an observation on 4/21/26 at 11:06 a.m. in the courtyard outside the door of the activities room, Resident 45 used a lighter to light a cigarette with procedure mask pulled down around her chin (still hooked over each ear). No facility staff was present, no ashtrays were within reach and there was a no smoking sign on the door to the activities room. During an observation on 4/21/26 at 11:20 am in the courtyard outside the door of the activities room, Resident 45 extinguished her cigarette on the side of a cup hanging on the side of her wheelchair, and placed the cigarette butt in the cup. Resident 45 then lit another cigarette, while her procedure mask was still pulled down around her chin (still hooked over each ear). There was no facility staff present. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) was able to exercise the right to refuse physician ordered meal consistency. This failure resulted in Resident 2's rights to make decisions on her care to be violated and had the potential for not meeting Resident 2's nutritional needs .Findings: During a review of Resident 2's Order Summary Report, (OSR) dated 10/15/25, the OSR indicated Resident 2's diet order was NAS (No Added Salt) diet pureed texture (foods are smooth, lump-free, and uniformly blended, resembling pudding or paste, used for people with chewing/swallowing difficulties), regular/thin consistency, no straws . During a review of Resident 2's care plan with the focus on non compliance with following recommendations related to diet/drinking fluids, initiated 10/16/25. The care plan indicated a few of the interventions were to Educate risk and benefits and possible outcomes of recommendations as needed .Observe for s/s of aspiration during routine care . residents right to refused…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one of three sampled residents (Resident 4) family members when Resident 4 had a fall incident. This failure had the potential for Resident 4's family member to be unaware of Resident 4's fall. Findings:During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, (AR) dated 12/22/25, the AR indicated Resident 4's first emergency contact was his daughter and second emergency contact was his son. During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set, (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 10/21/25, the MDS indicated, Resident 4's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-standardized assessment tool used to evaluate the mental processes that allow individuals to think, learn, and remember) score was 4 (a score of 0-7 suggests the resident has severely impaired cognition).During a concurrent interview and record review, on 12/17/25 at 3:08 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 4's Nursing Note, (NN) dated 12/1/25 at 6:04 a.m. was reviewed. The NN indicated Resident 4 was found on bathroom floor, nurse practitioner and DON were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 20 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Charge Nurse intentionally neglected to document, report, and assess Resident 1 after a fall incident. This failure had the potential for delay in care, Resident 1 feeling neglected, and injury.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set, (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 10/1/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score was 11 (a score of 8 to 12 indicates moderately impaired cognition). The MDS indicated Resident 1 had impairments to both upper extremities (shoulders, elbows, wrists, hands) and lower extremities (hips, knees, ankles, feet) of her body and Resident 1 was dependent (helper does all the effort) for chair/bed to chair transfers (the ability to transfer to and from bed to a chair or wheelchair).During a review of Resident 1's Behavior Note, (BN) dated 12/2/25 at 2:08 p.m. the BN indicated, Charge RN [Registered Nurse] found resident attempting to get out of bed to go play a game…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan for one of three sampled residents' (Resident 1) fall precaution. This failure had the potential to result injury for Resident 1.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's care plan (a comprehensive, personalized document that outlines the specific needs of an individual requiring care, detailing the type of support, how it will be provided, and the goals of the care) with the focus on The Resident has had an actual fall, initiated 12/13/25. The care plan indicated one of the interventions was Fall mats to both sides of bed when resident is in bed.During a concurrent observation, interview, and record review, on 12/17/25 at 1:52 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, in Resident 1's room. Resident 1 was in her bed with one fall mat at bedside. Resident 1's care plan with the focus on The Resident has had an actual fall, initiated 12/13/25, was reviewed. LVN 1 confirmed Resident 1 was care planned to have fall mats on both sides of the bed. LVN 1 stated Resident 1 had one fall mat at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Neurological Evaluation [Neuro check- is a group of questions and tests to check for disorder of the spinal cord and brain], for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall. This failure had the potential for a delay in treatment and care for Resident 1, and had the potential for Resident 1 to suffer adverse health outcomes.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Behavior Note, (BN) dated 12/2/25 at 3:11 p.m. the BN indicated, Resident [1] found on the floor sitting and naked and playing a game with my boys. RN [Registered Nurse] attempted to reorient resident to surroundings and she stated, I am going to eat your toes!. Resident was not aggressive or agitated but very confused and remains hallucinations of people and objects. Resident was dressed and place in Geri-Chair [a specialized, reclining, mobile chair on wheels designed for elderly or mobility-impaired] and Placed out by the nursing station to keep observing signed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-27 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct Medical Doctor (MD) and/or Nurse Practitioner (NP - a registered nurse with a graduate degree who provides advanced healthcare, including diagnosing and treating illnesses, ordering and interpreting tests, and prescribing medication) resident assessments per the facility policy and procedure for seven out of seven residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 7). This failure had the potential for residents' medical conditions to change without appropriate interventions by the MD or NP. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment (a standardized assessment to evaluate a resident's functional abilities and healthcare needs), dated 9/19/25, under the section titled, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - an assessment of cognition [how well a person thinks, remembers, and learns] with scores ranging from 0 to 15 with the higher the score the more intact the cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P&P) on Abuse Prevention Program - Reporting for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when: 1. The facility did not report an allegation of sexual abuse to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), the Ombudsman (representatives advocating residents in long-term care facilities) and the local law enforcement (LLE) within 24 hours. 2. The facility did not complete a follow-up investigative report (FIR) within five working days. These failures had the potential to result in continuous sexual abuse and emotional distress for Resident 1 and Resident 2. Findings: 1. During a review of the SOC-341 (Report of Suspected Dependent Adult/Elder Abuse), dated 6/14/25, the SOC-341 indicated, (Activities Assistant [AA]) reported that (Resident 2) stated that (Resident 1) grabbed her breast. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/26/25 at 1:39 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), the FAX Transmission Status (FTS), dated 6/16/25 was reviewed, the FTS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure on narcotic (pain medication) count, narcotic dispensing, and storage for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in missing narcotic medications and had the potential to affect Resident 1's pain control.During a review of the facility email (FEM), dated 6/24/25, the FEM indicated Resident 1's narcotic medications (morphine - a narcotic pain medication) were placed into the medication room on 6/11/25 but were not double locked in the narcotics drawer. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 accessed Resident 1's home medications during her evening shift (7 p.m. to 7:30 a.m.) to administer one morphine ER (extended release - medication that is released into the body over a period of time) 15 mg (milligram - a unit of measurement) pill to Resident 1. The FEM indicated, The (Resident 1's morphine) should not have been used, and the staff should have notified the provider (medical doctor) to see if an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure they staffed a Registered Nursed (RN) eight hours a day for seven days a week from 9/2024 to 12/2024. This failure had the potential to affect the quality of care of the residents and put the residents at risk for injury. Findings: During a review of the Payroll Staffing Data Report (PBJ) (an electronic system for facilities to submit staffing information) dated 10/1/24 to 12/31/24, the PBJ indicated, no RN hours dated 10/6,10/9,10/13,10/16,10/18,10/19,10/20,10/23/24,11/3,11/9,11/10,11/17,11/23, 11/24,11/28,11/29,11/30/24, 12/1,12/7,12/8,12/13,12/14,12/15,12/16,12/21,12/22, 12/24,12/25,12/26,12/27,12/28,12/29/24. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/12/25 at 10:50 a.m. with Staffing Coordinator (SC) the facility's Staffing Log dated 9/2024 to 12/2024 was reviewed. The Staffing log indicated on the following dates there was no RN for the regulated eight hours per day: On 9/6/24, 6.28 RN hours worked. On 9/7/24, 0 RN hours worked. On 9/15/24, 3.68 RN hours worked. On 9/16/24, 0 RN hours worked. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and store food in a sanitary manner when: 1. Food items were not closed and sealed appropriately in one of one dry storage room. 2. Food items did not have a received by date label in one of one dry storage room. These failures had the potential for Residents eating in the facility to be at risk of acquiring a foodborne illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/9/25 at 9:52 a.m. with [NAME] 1 in the kitchen's dry storage room, one bag of powdered Cocoa was on the shelf. The bag of Cocoa was not closed or sealed properly, it was open and exposed to room air. [NAME] 1 stated the bag should have been closed and sealed when it was opened. 2. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/9/25 at 9:57 a.m. with [NAME] 1 in the kitchen's dry storage room, five bottles of [NAME] Brand Chocolate syrup were on the shelf of the dry storage room. All five bottles did not have a received by date. [NAME] 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility failed to ensure tab alarm orders and informed consents were obtained for two of nine Residents (Resident 45 and Resident 14). 1. Resident 45 had no order and no informed consent for tab alarm. 2. Reisdent 14 had no informed consent for tab alarm. This failure had the potential for staff to be untrained in the proper use of alarms. Findings: During an observation on 06/10/25 at 11:57 a.m. in Resident 45's room, Resident 45 had a tab alarm (safety monitor to prevent falls or wandering) attached from the back of the wheelchair to the back of Resident 45's T-shirt. During a review of Resident 45's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a standardized assessment tool to evaluate residents' health status and functional abilities), dated 3/19/25, the MDS indicated, Restraints and Alarms Resident chair alarm not used. During a concurrent interview and record review on 06/11/25 at 10:56 a.m. with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Resident 45's Orders [undated], were reviewed. The orders indicated there was no order for a tab alarm. ADON stated there is no order for a tab alarm for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to document changes and monitor for one of two residents (Resident 22 and Resident 7) when: 1. A resident (Resident 22) had an unwitnessed fall. This failure resulted in Resident 22's fall being undocumented. 2. A resident (Resident 7) had a medical condition not monitored. This failure had the potential for Resident 7 to not have his blood sugars monitored. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 22's admission Record (AR) dated 11/28/23, the AR indicated, Alzheimer's disease (memory loss), fracture of left femur (broken bone), seizures (uncontrolled movements of the body), idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (a condition affecting walking, cognitive, and bladder), impaired normal pressure hydrocephalus, macular degeneration (blurred or no vision), and difficulty in walking. During review of Resident 22's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), (BIMS- an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgment status of the resident. A score of 13 to 15 cognitively intact, 8-12…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-12 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dental needs were met, and followed up for one of two sampled residents (Resident 47). This failure resulted in Resident 47 not recieving dentures, feeling embarrassed, and refusing to socialize with other residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 47's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, admission date 11/7/24. Diagnosis Information: depression [is a mood disorder that causes a constant feeling of sadness and loss of interest in daily activities]. During a review of Resident 47's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgment status of the resident. Scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. A score of 13-15 suggests intact cognition, 8-12 suggests moderate impairment, and 0-7 suggests severe impairment.), dated 3/19/25, the BIMS indicated Resident 47's score is 14. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/09/25 at 10:08 a.m. with Resident 47, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) grievance were investigated and resolved. This failure had the potential for psychosocial distress for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Concern/Comment From, (CCF) dated 4/1/25, the CCF indicated, Today, I had a particularly upsetting interaction with (Activities Supervisor [AS]) While I was stretching my leg during the activity, (AS) told me (Resident 1), If you don't want to be here, you can just go.the comment made (Resident 1) feel unwelcome and as if (Resident 1) didn't belong. when (residents) play Yahtzee [dice game], (AS) takes it upon herself to roll the dice for us, preventing us from fully participating in the game. (AS) confronted (Resident 1) and said, Why do you always play with (activities assistant) and not me? I'm the one who bought you biscuits and gravy. (Resident 1) never asked (AS) to buy (Resident 1) anything, and this comment made (Resident 1) feel uncomfortable and awkward. During a concurrent interview and record review, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) physical and emotional well-being. This failure resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 2 not to be able to fully take part in activities physically and the freedom to make their own choices. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set, (MDS – an assessment tool) dated 1/28/25, the MDS indicated, Resident 1's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status with a range of 0-15) score was 15 (a score of 13 to 15 suggests the resident is cognitively intact). The MDS indicated Resident 1 had no impairment (loss of use) to upper extremities (shoulders, elbows, wrists, and hands). During an interview on 4/7/25 at 10:52 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated the Activities Supervisor (AS) does not allow him to roll the dice in Yahtzee, he stated AS does not allow anyone to roll the dice. Resident 1 stated AS treats the resident like they are handicap. Resident 1 stated he chooses not to go to activities when AS is doing activities. During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) and Restorative Nursing Assistant's (RNA) to meet the needs for 20 of 31 sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 8, Resident 10, Resident 11, Resident 13, Resident 15, Resident 16, Resident 17, Resident 19, Resident 21, Resident 22, Resident 23, Resident 26, Resident 29, Resident 30, Resident 40, and Resident 42). This failure had the potential for a decline in residents Range of Motion (ROM) and mobility. Findings: During an interview on 4/22/24 at 2:19 p.m. with Resident 17, Resident 17 stated the CNAs are always short staffed and it takes 45 minutes to answer the call lights. Resident 17 stated it mostly happens at night, but it also happens during the day. Resident 17 stated she has not gotten her exercises for several days or maybe weeks. During a review of Resident 17's BIMS, dated 4/25/24 the BIMS indicated, Resident 17 had BIMS score of 15 [Intact cognitive response]. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/22/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one refrigerator and one freezer were monitored for temperature control. This failure had the potential for foodborne illnesses to be spread to residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/23/24 at 9:32 a.m. with Director of Nursing (DON) and Activities Director (AD) in the Day room, the Day room refrigerator nor freezer had a thermometer inside. There were drinks in the refrigerator and ice cream in the freezer. DON stated this is where food brought in from the outside would be stored. DON and AD confirmed there were no thermometers. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/23/24 at 10:29 a.m. with Plant Operations Manager (POM), the SNF Activities Refrigerator [Day room] report ([NAME]), dated 4/23/24, was reviewed. The [NAME] indicated, There are no data to be displayed. POM stated the [NAME] indicated there was no data because the sensor had been installed that same day. POM stated food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 21) was referred for a Preadmission and Resident Review (PASRR-screening tool used to determine if placement in a nursing facility is appropriate for those with mental illness and makes recommendations for specialized services based on the Level II evaluation) after a change in psychological status. This failure resulted in Resident 21 not receiving recommendations for specialized services to best meet her needs. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/24/24 at 10:45 a.m. with the Social Worker (MSW) Resident 21's PASRR, dated 11/26/19 and Psychiatric Mental Health Progress Note (PMHPN), dated 8/22/23 were reviewed. The PASRR indicated, Generalized Anxiety Disorder [feelings of worry or restlessness that can interfere with daily activities]. The PMHPN indicated, Schizophrenia [mental disorder that affects a person's ability to think feel and behave clearly]. MSW stated the PASRR does not include diagnosis of schizophrenia. MSW stated Resident 21 received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to communicate the weightbearing status to the interdisciplinary team (IDT-group of healthcare professionals from different fields working together) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 13). This failure resulted in a delay of rehabilitative and restorative care to prevent further physical decline. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/22/24 at 10:07 a.m. in Resident 13's room, Resident 13 was in bed with a brace on her right leg. Resident 13 stated she wanted to have therapy, but had not received any since she broke her leg about six weeks ago. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 10:30 a.m. with Physical Therapist (PT), PT stated she discontinued Resident 13's RNA (Restorative Nursing Assistant - light stretching and range of motion) on 3/29/24 because she was unable to determine the weightbearing status. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 12:08 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 2 stated Resident 13 went to the orthopedic doctor on 3/18/24. No orders or follow up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care for the Foley catheter (tube placed into the bladder to drain urine) to prevent infections and other complications for one of four sampled residents (Resident 33). This failure had the potential to result in infections and injury to the penis or bladder. Findings: During an observation on 4/24/24 at 7:23 a.m. outside Resident 33's room, Resident 33's Foley catheter tubing was on the floor under the wheelchair. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 stated Resident 33 is currently being treated for a urinary tract infection (UTI-bladder infection) and his catheter tubing should not be on floor because of the risk for infection or getting pulled out. During an interview on 4/24/24 at 11:22 a.m. with Infection Preventionist (IP), IP stated Resident 33's catheter tubing should not have been touching the floor. IP stated Resident 33 is already at a high risk for infection. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Indwelling Foley Catheter Care, dated 11/6/13, the P&P indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Change a physician order, and 2. Communicate the change in the dietary order to provide the dietary preferences for one of three sampled residents (Resident 33). This failure resulted in Resident 33's preferences to not be honored and had the potential to result in further weight loss. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and observation on 4/22/24 at 12:44 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in Resident 33's room, Resident 33's meal tray contained a glass of milk that had been thickened (for those with swallowing difficulty) and a carton of reduced fat milk that had not been thickened. CNA 1 stated Resident 33 was served thickened milk by the kitchen, but Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 told her Resident 33 was supposed to have gotten thin liquids. CNA 1 stated she went to the kitchen and got the carton of reduced fat milk. CNA 1 stated Resident 33's tray ticket indicated Resident 33's preference was for whole milk. CNA 1 stated she did not honor Resident 33's preference. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store oxygen tubing per policy for two of four sampled residents (Resident 13 and Resident 31). This failure had the potential to result in respiratory infections. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/22/24 at 11:30 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in Resident 13's room, Resident 13's oxygen tubing was laying on the handrail of the bed. CNA 1 stated it is supposed to go in the plastic bag. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/22/24 at 2:56 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) 1 in Resident 31's room, Resident 31's oxygen tubing was on the handrail of the bed. RN 1 stated if the tubing is not in use, it should have been placed in the plastic bag to avoid contamination. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Oxygen Therapy Supplies, dated 12/1/10, the P&P indicated, Purpose: To ensure residents receiving oxygen therapy. have clean equipment to decrease the risk of infection. All tubing will be placed in a plastic bag.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$31,581 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $21,548 — penalty dated 2025-10-27
  • $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-11-25
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-01-08 for 51 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BLYTHE, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/03/2017
CLARK, FREDERICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
ELCONIN, KATHERYNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
ELLIOTT, ROSSIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
PARKS, EUGENEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/07/2018
LOVRICH, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/15/2026
PETTIJOHN, BRENDAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/06/2023
GROSS, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2020
MARKMAN, SALLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/03/2014
SMITH, AMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/18/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555517. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next