Bella Vista Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 342 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 246 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 89.3 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.01 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medication as ordered for one of four sampled residents (1). As a result, Resident 1 was at increased risk of medication side effects.Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include fibromyalgia (a pain disorder). Per the facility's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated April 2026, Resident 1 had an order for oxycodone (a pain medication) 10 milligram (mg) 1 tablet every six hours as needed for pain. On 4/4/26 at 12:24 P.M., Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 signed that he administered one tablet to Resident 1. Per the facility's Medication Count sheet for oxycodone 10mg, LN 2 signed out two tablets for Resident 1 on 4/4/26 at 12:24 P.M. On 4/17/26 at 4:22 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted with LN 2. LN 2 stated he did not remember why he signed out two tablets for Resident 1's 10mg oxycodone on 4/4/26. On 4/22/26 at 2:09 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-17 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dietary staff were competent on the ambient temperature (the temperature of the surrounding air, room temperature) food cool down process and cooked food cool down process for Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food (TCS- foods that can rapidly spoil and cause illness). These failures placed the facility's residents who consumed food prepared in the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness. Findings:According to the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code 2017, Section 3-501.14 Cooling, Time/Temperature control for Safety Food shall be cooled within 4 hours to 5oC (degrees Celsius) (41oF) (degrees Fahrenheit) or less if prepared from ingredients at ambient temperature, such as .canned tuna.According to the FDA's online job aid titled Cooling Cooked Time/Temperature Control for Safety Foods and the FDA's Food Code: For Food Employees dated July 2024, indicated, .Bacteria or other pathogens that cause foodborne illness can grow rapidly on TCS foods when they are not cooled properly. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure practices that mitigated the risk of resident food contamination were followed when: Fruit flies were observed flying around the kitchen. An open food thickener container was placed right next to the open trash can. A staff food cart was stored in the kitchen. An expired cream cheese was found in the walk-in refrigerator. Tuna salad sandwiches and hard-boiled eggs were not cooled down (a two-stage method for rapidly cooling food to prevent the growth of bacteria) properly. Washed dishes were stacked wet and with food residue on them. Washed coffee mugs had residue on them. Cooked chicken did not have a temperature taken before being plated and placed in the meal cart.These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses among residents who received food from the kitchen.Findings: On 9/28/25 at 7:48 A.M., an initial kitchen tour was conducted with Dietary Aid (DA) 1. During the kitchen tour, some fruit flies were seen flying around where onions, potatoes, and bananas were stored in boxes under a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-17 · tag F0813 — pattern
  Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of resident food brought from outside of the facility when: Resident food was stored in the resident refrigerator for over 72 hours. Resident food containers were not properly labeled. The thermometer located in the resident food refrigerator was broken and the temperatures entered in the log were consistently over 41 degrees F (Fahrenheit). Staff food items were found in the designated resident refrigerator. The facility did not implement its policy titled Food Brought from Outside.As a result, the residents were at risk of consuming potentially contaminated food.Findings: On 09/28/25 at 12:13 P.M., an observation of the resident refrigerator and interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1 was conducted. CNA 1 stated the refrigerator located in the dining hall stored resident food brought from outside the facility. A temperature log and a sign with All items in this refrigerator must be dated and label [sic]. Open food good for 3 days only was observed on the outside of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review Level II (PASARR II - an evaluation of the resident's psychiatric treatment requirements) was followed up on and completed for two of four residents (Resident 26 and 49) reviewed for PASARR.This failure had the potential for Resident 26 and Resident 49 to not receive necessary mental health care services in an appropriate healthcare setting.Findings:A review of Resident 26's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, unspecified (a mental health condition that combines symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder causing persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and a loss of interest in activities), and bipolar disorder (a mental health disorder with mood swings). A review of Resident 26's Level I PASARR 1 screening from the Health Care Services dated 6/5/25, indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services according to acceptable standards of practice when the documentation on the Controlled Drug Record (CDR an accounting of controlled medications, drugs with a high abuse potential) and the Medication Administration Record (MAR documentation in the medical record that a resident received a medication) did not reconcile for one of three randomly selected residents (Resident 14). This failure had the potential for drug diversion (illegal acquisition, misuse, or transfer of prescription medication for an unauthorized purpose) and/or inadequate pain management. Findings:A review of Resident 14's admission Record indicated he was admitted to facility on 2/8/25 with a diagnosis of surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin and subcutaneous tissue (fatty tissue).A review of Resident 14's order summary dated 8/27/25, indicated the resident was to receive Morphine Sulfate (medication used to treat pain) oral tablet 15 milligrams (mg) every four hours as needed for moderate to severe pain.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide outside dental resources and services in a timely manner for one resident (Resident 6). As a result, Resident 6 waited over 11 months to be evaluated for a new denture and was at risk for potential issues with the fitting of the new denture caused by the delay in receiving dental care and treatment. Findings:A review of Resident 6's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 9/28/25 at 9:43 A.M., an interview was conducted with Resident 6. When the resident was asked if she had any issues with her care, she stated she was waiting for her teeth. On 9/30/25 at 9:11A.M., a joint interview and record review was conducted with the Social Services Director (SSD). The SSD reviewed Resident 6's Dental Progress Notes dated 10/31/24 and stated Resident 6 was waiting for a denture evaluation by a dentist from the newly approved dental program, because the resident insurance did not cover dentures. On 10/1/25 at 8:05…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) accurately reflected the presence of a diagnosed mental disorder for 1 (Resident #44) of 5 residents reviewed for PASRR requirements. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review revealed, Purpose: To ensure that all facility applicants are screened for mental illness and/or intellectual disability and to ensure coordination with the appropriate state agencies if indicated. The policy specified, II. The Facility, ensures that PASRR Level I is completed either by the transferring general acute care hospital (GACH), or by the Facility for all applicants, regardless of Payor source, prior to admission to determine if they have a serious mental illness (SMI) and/or intellectual disability, developmental disability or related condition(s) (ID/DD/RC). An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #44 on 06/04/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and/or biologicals were removed from 1 (Station 1) of 2 medication storage rooms and 1 of 1 central supply closet. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, revised in 11/2020, indicated, The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. The policy specified, Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. An observation on 07/24/2024 at 12:07 PM of the medication storage room located on Station 1 revealed a Nozin Nasal Sanitizer with an expiration date of 03/2024. During an interview on 07/25/2024 at 12:09 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) #3 stated the Nozin Nasal Sanitizer was not supposed to be in the medication storage room, because it was expired. An observation on 07/24/2024 at 12:16 PM of the central supply closet revealed two boxes of Tucks (medicated pads) with an expiration date of 03/2024. During an interview on 07/25/2024 at 12:13 PM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and treatment to a resident's (1) identified skin issues (redness of the buttocks), for one of three sampled residents, when Resident 1's physician was not informed of the resident's skin condition during admission to the facility. The delayed care and treatment to Resident 1's skin issues had the potential to worsen Resident 1's skin condition. Findings: On 2/9/24, an unannounced onsite at the facility was conducted related to a complaint on quality of care. During a review of the facility's admission Record, dated 12/31/23, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility, with diagnoses which included generalized body weakness, dementia (inability to think, remember and reason), hemiplegia (paralysis that affect one side of the body), and hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move on one side of the body). During a review of Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $825K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA