No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Vienna Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

800 So. Ham Lane, Lodi, CA 95242 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (209) 368-7141 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (209) 368-7141 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Nov 2023Resident-funds citation (F0567)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (22% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
2415 W Vine St · (209) 333-3121 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2415 W Vine St, D · (209) 333-3167 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway1.0 mi
2449 W Kettleman Ln · (209) 367-7875 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(209) 333-6742 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
801 S Lower Sacramento Rd · (209) 369-1948

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%4.0%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.3%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.0%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.1%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.9%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.7%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.7%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.4%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.5%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.822.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.751.571.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 322 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
49.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 49.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 139 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.6%CMS range 38.2–47.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.6–13.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge49.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge65.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge49.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 5.3–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.771.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.54
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
22.1%
Total nursing turnover
31.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 137.2 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.07 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.84 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-20)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1's) representative was provided timely access to Resident 1's personal funds.This failure resulted in Resident 1's rights regarding financial matters to not be recognized.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia (condition that causes a decline in cognitive abilities such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and problem solving).During a review of a letter sent to the facility, from the County Conservator's office, dated 5/13/24, the letter indicated, .Subject: Conservatorship [person appointed by a judge to manage personal and financial affairs of an individual] of [Resident1].On 05/07/2024 [Name of Guardian/Conservator] was appointed Conservator of [Resident 1].Please add [Name of Guardian/Conservator] as the responsible party for [Resident 1].During a review of a letter sent to the facility, from Resident 1's Conservator, dated 2/26/26, the letter indicated, .Dear Business Office…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper food storage and preparation, as well as maintaining kitchen equipment and food contact surfaces in accordance with professional standards for food safety for 133 residents who consumed facility-prepared meals when:1. Kitchen contained worn and improperly maintained food preparation equipment such as, three blenders were visibly discolored, five cooking sheet trays had dark brown residue buildup in the inside corners, and two cutting boards had multiple scratches on both sides; and2. A container of cheddar cheese dated 1/29/26 and a container of mozzarella cheese dated 2/4/26 were not properly labeled and were stored in the walk-in refrigerator without clear identification to ensure safe use within appropriate time frames. These failures had the potential to promote the growth of harmful microorganisms and increase the risk of foodborne illness for all residents receiving meals prepared in the facility.Findings:1.During the initial tour of the kitchen on 2/17/26 at 8:14 a.m., the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to practice appropriate infection prevention and control measures for a census of 136, when:1. Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention that requires staff to wear gowns and gloves during high contact care for residents with wounds, medical devices or known multidrug resistant germs) were not followed while draining Resident 6's foley catheter;2. Staff did not do hand hygiene while passing meal trays for Resident 158, Resident 152, Resident 115, and Resident 31, and;3. Oxygen tubing for Resident 148 and Resident 149 did not have protective storage bags. These failures in infection prevention and control measures had the potential to spread the infection to staff and other residents in the facility.Findings: 1. A review of Resident 6's medical record titled, admission RECORD, indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 2026 with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection (infection of the bladder) and retention of urine (condition when the bladder does not empty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for two of 35 sampled residents (Resident 4 and Resident 152) when:Staff stood while assisting Resident 4 with meals and did not position themself at Resident 4's eye level.Resident 152's urinary catheter bag (a bag that collects urine from the bladder through a urinary catheter - a soft tube that drains urine from the bladder) was exposed and not placed in a dignity bag (a cover used to hold and hide the catheter bag to maintain privacy).These failures had the potential to negatively impact Resident 4 and Resident 152's psychosocial well-being (emotional and social health, including how a person feels and interacts with others).Findings: 1.Review of Resident 4's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease (a condition affecting blood flow to the brain), aphasia (difficulty in speaking or understanding words), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of two of 35 sampled residents (Resident 17 and Resident 147) when Resident 17 and Resident 147 had call lights (devices used to contact staff for assistance) that were not within their reach.This deficient practice placed Resident 17 and Resident 147 at increased risk for unmet care needs, delayed staff response, falls, and potential for accidents or injury.Findings:1.Review of Resident 17's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (memory loss and trouble thinking), encephalopathy (a problem with the brain that affects thinking or alertness), anxiety disorder, unspecified falls, fracture of lumbosacral spine and pelvis (broken bones in the lower back and hip area).During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/17/26 at 2:25 PM, with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2 in Resident 17's room, Resident 17 was lying in his bed, and the call light was not within his reach. CNA 2 confirmed Resident 17's call light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident choices and preferences for care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 86) when, Resident 86's hair was cut against his wishes.This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 86's dignity and well-being due to not being able to make decisions regarding his care.Findings: A review of Resident 86's medical record titled, admission RECORD, indicated Resident 86 was admitted to the facility in 2023 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (a form of paralysis that affects one side of the body, usually due to a brain or spinal cord injury) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest in things and activities). A review of Resident 86's progress notes, dated 2/18/26, indicated .SSD was informed by resident that last week he had his hair cut by a CNA without his consent. SSD interviewed resident and he stated that last week sometime his CNA came in and cut his hair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 6) rights related to treatment choices were known and protected when Resident 6's code status was not available on the electronic health record (EHR). This failure had the potential for Resident 6's wishes regarding emergency treatment to not be followed. Findings: A review of Resident 6's medical record titled, admission RECORD, indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility in 2026 with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (a long term condition when the heart could not pump blood efficiently that causes blood to build up), hypertensive heart failure (an uncontrolled high blood pressure condition that forces the heart to work too hard causing the muscle to thicken, stiffen or weaken) and palliative care (specialized medical care that focuses on providing pain relief, symptoms and stress caused by serious illnesses). During a record review on [DATE] at 2:26 p.m., of Resident 6's electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment for six of 136 residents (Resident 6, Resident 12, Resident 54, Resident 67, Resident 105, Resident 126 ), when the hot water temperature in the bathroom of rooms A and B were found to be less than the required temperature range of 105 degrees Fahrenheit ( F - unit of measure) to 120 F.This failure has the potential to negatively impact on the hygiene and comfort of the residents who used the bathroom in rooms A and B. Findings:A review of facility provided document titled, Daily Census, dated 2/17/26, indicated that room A had three residents occupying the room and room B had three residents occupying the room.A review of Resident 67's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 67 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including anemia (low red blood count [RBC] - RBCs carry oxygen throughout the body and a low RBC count can cause a person to feel cold) and resided in room B.A review of Resident 126's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 126 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the use of physical restraint (equipment used to limit a resident's movement) was safe to use and medically necessary for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 147) when Resident 147, who had the ability to walk with assistance, was placed in a Geri chair (a reclining chair used when a resident cannot safely sit in a regular chair or wheelchair and can prevent a resident from rising independently) without informed consent (resident or resident's representative was informed and agreed to its use), or a Geri chair care plan. This failure removed Resident 147's ability to move freely and placed Resident 147 at risk for physical decline and psychosocial harm (effects on feelings, comfort, and dignity) related to restraint use. Findings: Review of Resident 147's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 147 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hereditary factor VIII deficiency (a blood clotting disorder that increases bleeding risk), unspecified dementia (memory loss and trouble thinking),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accidents or hazards for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 131) when Resident 131's smoking assessment was not completed quarterly by the required due date, no smoking care plan was initiated, and Resident 131 was allowed to smoke without supervision.This failure had the potential to place Resident 131 and other residents in the facility at risk for accidental burns and injuries.Findings:Review of Resident 131's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 131 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dysarthria following cerebral infarction (slurred or unclear speech after a clot/bleed in the brain), depression, type 2 diabetes mellitus (body has trouble controlling blood sugar), polyneuropathy (nerve damage causing numbness, tingling, pain, or weakness), pain, displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of right tibia (a broken lower leg bone that shattered into multiple pieces and moved out of place),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess pain and provide timely pain relief for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2 reported moderate (medium level) pain, waited for 10 minutes for non-pharmacological interventions (comfort measures that do not involve medication), and was not reassessed for pain.This failure resulted in Resident 2 experiencing ongoing, uncontrolled pain, which affected Resident 2's comfort and emotional well-being (the ability to feel calm, comfortable, and free from distress). Findings:Review of Resident 2's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including unspecified B-Cell lymphoma (type of blood cancer with swollen glands), depression, age-related osteoporosis (weak or brittle bones), and pain.Review of Resident 2's Pain Assessment - V1 dated 12/5/25 indicated Resident 2 had chronic (long lasting) pain relieved by repositioning and pain pills.Review of Resident 2's Care Plan, initiated on 12/8/25, in the section titled Focus, indicated .I [Resident 2] have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the safe use of bed rails (side rails) for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 80) when Resident 80 did not have a completed bed rail assessment to determine whether bed rails were needed and safe to use.This failure placed Resident 1 at risk of entrapment and serious injury.Findings:Review of Resident 80's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 80 was admitted to the facility in 10/2025 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a condition that causes memory loss and confusion), hyperosmolality and hypernatremia (high levels of salt or concentration in the blood that can cause dehydration and confusion), anxiety disorder, depression, metabolic encephalopathy (confusion caused by a medical condition), and anemia.Review of Resident 80's Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS: an assessment tool) dated 2/5/26, in the section titled Section C-Cognitive Patterns, indicated Resident 80 had short-term and long-term memory problems, impaired recall ability and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was less than 5% (% or percentage is a fraction of a number out of 100) during medication administration. The facility had a total of three errors out of 28 opportunities which resulted in a facility wide medication error rate of 10.71%. Medication observations were conducted over multiple days, at varied times, in random locations throughout the facility. The three medication errors were identified in two residents (Resident 93 and Resident 83) out of eight residents observed for medication administration observation as follows:1. Resident 93 was given medication without a doctor's order.2. Resident 93's ordered medication was not given.3. Resident 83's medication that was ordered to be given with food was not given as ordered.These failures could contribute to unsafe medications use, medication error, and not following the doctor's orders.Findings:1. During a medication observation with Licensed Nurse (LN) 7, at station 2 hallway, on 2/18/26, at 8:44 AM, LN 7 prepared and poured…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage and labeling practices in one out of two medication rooms and two out of three medication carts when:1. An expired bottle of ocular vitamins (specialized supplements containing high concentrations of nutrients designed to support vision and reduce the risk of age-related eye disease) was found in the Station 2 Medication Storage Room and an expired bottle of ocular vitamins was found in the Station 1 Medication Cart 3; and2. Two pill cutters (a device used to safely and accurately divide medication tablets, vitamins, and supplements) were found with white and grayish residue in two different medication carts (Medication Cart 5 and Medication Cart 3).These failed practices could contribute to unsafe medication use, medication error, and risk of contaminated products or supplies.Findings:1. During a concurrent interview and inspection of the facility's medication storage room at Station 2, on 2/17/26 at 8:41 AM, accompanied by Licensed Nurse (LN) 2, a bottle of ocular vitamins had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility's Resident Care/Quality Assurance Committee (a mandatory, internal group within a nursing home or skilled nursing facility. Its purpose is to identify, monitor, and improve the quality of care and life for residents, as required by federal law for facilities receiving Medicare or Medicaid funding) failed to meet quarterly with all required members, when the Infection Preventionist (IP) did not attend the quarter 2 meeting on 4/24/25.This failure had the potential of leading to staff lacking knowledge and coordination of care for a census of 136, thereby resulting in risk for safety, spread of infection, and hospitalization.Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/20/26, at 11:50 AM, with the Director of Nursing (DON), the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI- a data-driven, proactive approach mandated by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS] for healthcare facilities to continuously monitor, analyze, and improve the quality of care and services) 2025 binder was reviewed. The DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the Department an injury of unknown source (an injury which was not observed, cannot be explained by the resident, and is suspicious because of the extent or location) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had a bruise on the right side of her neck and left clavicle (a bone that connects the breastbone to the shoulder blade) identified on 11/14/24 and 11/15/24 respectively, and the facility did not report this to the Department until 11/21/24. This failure resulted in a delay in the Department investigation into Resident 1' s bruises and had the potential for an occurrence of abuse to go undetected. Findings: A review of Resident 1' s admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included dementia (a decline in memory or other thinking skills severe enough to reduce a person ' s ability to perform everyday activities). During a review of Resident 1' s Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment and care planning tool), dated 10/17/24, the cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food storage and service was in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, for the 139 residents who ate facility prepared meals when: 1. The cook's refrigerator was found with the temperature varying anywhere from 42-50 degrees Fahrenheit; 2. The three-door freezer (used for meats) had ice buildup behind the second and third doors, around the top of the door frame; 3. The three-door freezer had an open box of vegetarian meatballs that was exposed to the air; 4. Three fans were found with discolored blades; 5. Two metal shelves in cook's preparation area found with rusted areas; and 6. Four cutting boards found with black staining and deep grooves on cutting surfaces. These failures had the potential of leading to food borne illness for the 139 residents eating facility prepared meals. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 10/15/2024 at 8:15 a.m., the temperature for the cook's refrigerator was found varying between 42 degrees Fahrenheit (F, a unit of measurement) for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide consistent guidance to staff regarding food brought to residents from outside sources. This failure had the potential of unsafe food items being distributed to the 139 residents leading to choking risk, allergic reactions, and food borne illness. Findings: During a review of facility policy and procedure (P&P) on 10/15/2024 at 1:18 p.m., from the survey binder titled Food Brought To Resident By Family/Friends/Activity Department revised 11/28/16 indicated that 6. Cooked left-over food be discarded after two (2) hours bedside. The policy did not include procedures for storing food for residents. During an interview with the Quality Assurance (QA) nurse on 10/15/24 at 3:20 p.m. in unit 2, the QA nurse stated that family can bring food into facility for resident. Food brought for the resident would be stored in the resident refrigerator. The QA nurse showed where the resident refrigerator was located in the hospitality suite. An observation of signage on the resident refrigerator indicated All staff must…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were followed for two of 34 sampled residents (Resident 114 and 70) when: 1. Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3) did not wear gloves during the administration of Resident 114's Paroxetine (medication used to treat depression) per physician's order; and 2. The dose for Resident 70's Zolpidem (medication used to treat insomnia [trouble falling asleep]) was not given but was signed as administered. These failures had the potential to result in contamination of the medication and exposure of Resident 114 and the LN to side effects, and confusion and inaccuracies in Resident 70's medication administration. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 114's admission records, the records indicated Resident 114 was admitted in June 2024 with diagnoses which included depression. Resident 114's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 114 had intact cognition. During a review of Resident 114's physician order dated 6/24/24, the order indicated, Paroxetine .40 MG…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified in a timely manner of a medication refusal for one of 34 sampled residents (Resident 12). This failure had the potential to cause negative outcomes to Resident 12's physical and mental well being. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 12 was admitted with diagnoses including pulmonary embolism (a blood clot gets stuck in a blood vessel in the lung blocking blood flow) and atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm that may lead to blood clots if left untreated). A review of Resident 12's Order Summary Report indicated a physician order dated 9/26/24, Xarelto (blood thinner, treats or prevents blood clots) Oral Tablet 20 MG (milligram, unit of measurement) .Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for A. Fibrillation. Hold for heavy vaginal bleeding. On hold from 10/02/2024 .to 10/09/2024 . A review of Resident 12's care plan initiated 2/10/24 indicated, I am at risk for bleeding r/t: [related to] Xarelto use A review of Resident 12's Medication Administration Note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent pressure injuries (localized pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) for 2 of 34 sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 37) when: 1. Resident 3 did not have a foot cradle (device used to relieve pressure from the lower extremities by preventing blankets and linens from laying directly on the lower extremities) and sheepskin padding in place as ordered by physician; and, 2. Resident 37's foot cradle was used incorrectly when linens and towels were placed on top of the frame allowing bed linens and blankets to lay directly on lower extremities. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 3 and Resident 37 developing pressure injuries. Findings: 1. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 3 was admitted with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). A review of Resident 3's physician order's indicated orders for Foot cradle in bed dated 10/11/14,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 34 sampled residents (Resident 45) received care and services to address her right hand contracture (a tightening of the muscles, tendons, and skin, causing resident's fingers to bend and curl towards the palm), when the facility did not implement preventative measures to maintain the resident's hand mobility and prevent worsening of Resident 45's contracture. This failure resulted in Resident 45 experiencing a severe right hand contracture leading to further decline in use of her hand and had the potential to result in pain and skin problems. Findings: A review of Resident 45's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident in 2016 with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body) and hemiparesis (weakness of half of the body) following a stroke affecting the right dominant side). A review of the physician progress note dated 9/29/23 indicated Resident 45 was alert and oriented,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage, usage, handling, and labeling of respiratory care equipment were consistent with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) for one of 34 sampled residents (Resident 13) when a nebulizer (a machine that turns medicine into a mist) mask and tubing were not properly stored and replaced as ordered, and nasal cannula (a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) was used and connected to a nebulizer machine. These failures had the potential to result in unsafe and unsanitary delivery of respiratory treatments to Resident 13. Findings: 1a. During a review of Resident 13's admission records, the records indicated Resident 13 was admitted in April 2023 with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breath), shortness of breath, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Resident 13's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 13 had intact cognition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 34 residents (Resident 34) when doses of Resident 34's PRN (as needed) pain medication were given without adequate indication. This failure had the potential to increase Resident 34's risk of exposure to side effects and dependence on pain medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission record, the record indicated Resident 34 was admitted in September 2024 with diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of half of the body), and disorders of bone density (amount of minerals in the bone) and structure. Resident 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 34 had moderate cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 34's Pain Assessment, dated 9/5/24, the assessment indicated Resident 34 was able to self-report pain and could comprehend use of numerical pain scale. The assessment further indicated Resident 34's goal for pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure safety for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when he was verbally threatened and then hit and kicked by Resident 2. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining skin tears to the bridge of his nose and right arm, large abrasion to his left shoulder, experienced pain, and had the potential to negatively affect his long term emotional well-being. Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled, Resident to Resident Abuse, dated 3/2017 indicated, Our facility will not condone resident abuse by anyone .Facility will monitor residents for aggressive/inappropriate behavior towards other residents .or the staff. A review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 in the summer of last year with multiple diagnoses, including tremors (excessive shaking or trembling). Resident 1 scored 13 out of 15 in a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, tests memory and recall) dated 1/2/24, which indicated he was cognitively intact. According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment and ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from verbal abuse by a staff member, by failing to ensure the facility's staff (FS 1), was not raising his voice, arguing with Resident 1, and calling the resident inappropriate names. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to be fearful and to negatively affect her psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 with multiple diagnoses, including herpes viral encephalitis (a neurological disorder characterized by inflammation of the brain, which can lead to mental confusion) and depression. A review of Resident 1's ' Incident Note,' dated 10/19/23, at 11:06 a.m., indicated, Nursing staff reported to Administrator, witnessed incident between resident [Resident 1] and another staff member .Resident [1] saw staff member's lunch bag .opened lunch bag and took a bag of chips .and started to eat them .At 11:06 [a.m.] Staff member [FS 1] saw that his lunch bag had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their medication and pain management policy and procedure to ensure standards of professional practice were maintained during Medication Administration for a census of 115 when: 1. Pain was not assessed properly for Resident 66; 2. Glycolax powder (a medication used for constipation) was not administered as ordered for Resident 26; 3. Blood pressure (BP) was not checked as ordered prior to giving medication for Resident 85; 4. Medications administered or held were on not documented in a timely manner for Resident 16; and 5. Resident 16's electronic medical record was not protected during medication administration. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the resident's health outcomes. Additionally, failure to protect health records denied residents their rights to privacy of their information. Findings: 1. According to Resident 66's 'admission Record' he was admitted to the facility recently with multiple diagnoses that included fracture of the left ulna (a forearm bone) and unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident 47, Resident 81, and Resident 113) were assisted with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) when fingernails were long and had blackish substance underneath the nails, for a census of 115. These failures increased the potential to result in skin problems or injuries. Findings: A review of Resident 47's clinical record indicated a diagnoses including dementia (memory loss that interferes with daily functions) and macular degeneration (a condition that causes vision loss). A Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 8/9/22, indicated Resident 47 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with personal hygiene. A concurrent observation and interview was conducted on 10/11/22 at 12:34 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1). Resident 47 had long fingernails and had blackish substance underneath her nails. The CNA 1 confirmed the finding and stated Resident 47's fingernails were long and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for one of two residents, (Resident 269) who received renal hemodialysis (HD, a treatment necessary for kidney failure to remove unwanted toxins, waste products, and excess fluids by filtering the blood), when the facility failed to communicate and collaborate with the transport agency. This failure resulted in fatigue and frustration when transportation was delayed for an hour or more on multiple occasions. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 269 was admitted to the facility earlier this year with multiple diagnoses which included the after care after right hip surgery, end stage kidney failure resulting in the need for dialysis. A review of the Minimum Data Set, (MDS, resident assessment and care screening tool), dated 9/25/22 indicated Resident 269's brief interview of mental status (BIMS, a brief screener that aids in detecting cognitive impairment) score was 13 (a score of 13-15 indicated intact cognition). Resident 269 was totally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in sanitary condition by failing to ensure the Quaternary Ammonium sanitizing solution (a chemical agent used to destroy germs) used for sanitizing kitchen surfaces and equipment had the required concentration to be effective and Dietary Aide 2 failed to follow proper hand hygiene between tasks. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness to 114 vulnerable residents receiving food from the facility kitchen. Findings: On 10/11/22 at 8:25 a.m., during an initial kitchen tour accompanied by the Dietary Supervisor and [NAME] 1 a red bucket containing clear solution inside was observed on the shelf. [NAME] 1 explained the solution in the red bucket was filled with Quaternary Ammonium solution to sanitize the clean surfaces after they were cleaned with soap and water. On 10/11/22, at 8:55 a.m., the Dietary Aide 1 stated the concentration of the chemical should be 200 ppm (parts per million, the concentration of the solution). After DA 1 dipped an orange test strip into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed for a census of 115 when: 1. Reusable equipment was not sanitized after use and between residents for (Resident 16, Resident 26, and Resident 85) and, proper hand hygiene was not followed during medication administration for Resident 85; 2. Resident 268, who had an infectious condition, shared a room with a vulnerable resident, and 3. There was no Contact Isolation Precautions signage posted informing visitors that the resident was on isolation precautions (measures taken to prevent the spread of germs/infection from one person to another). These failures had the potential to spread infection between and among the residents. Findings: 1. According to Resident 66's 'admission Record' he was admitted to the facility recently with multiple diagnoses that included hypertension and unspecified pain. According to Resident 26's 'admission Record' she was admitted to the facility last year with multiple diagnoses that included dementia and hypertension. According…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Range of Motion (ROM, the degree of movement that occurs at a given joint during an exercise program) exercises were provided as ordered for one resident (Resident 81), for a census of 115. This failure increased the potential for Resident 81 to experience further reduction in ROM. Findings: A review of Resident 81's clinical record indicated a diagnoses including dislocation of right hip and presence of right artificial hip joint. A Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 8/25/22, indicated Resident 81 had moderate cognitive impairment and functional limitation in ROM on both lower extremity. Review of Resident 81's physician's order dated 8/26/22 indicated, RNA [Restorative Nursing Assistant] for ROM 3x/week .every day shift . A concurrent interview and record review with the Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3) was conducted on 10/14/22 at 12:51 p.m. LN 3 confirmed Resident 1 had no documented RNA for ROM from 10/1/22 to 10/12/22. There was no documented evidence in Resident 81's clinical records as to why ROM was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-14 · tag F0912 — isolated
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of living space per resident in rooms 24, 33, 43, and 68. This failure had the potential to compromise the residents' care and privacy. Findings: Review of a facility request for the square footage room waiver dated 9/17/2019, indicated the following multiple resident bedrooms measured less than 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident: room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 74 sq. ft. per resident, Rooms 33 measured 71.5 sq. ft. per resident, Rooms 43 measured 77.5 sq. ft. per resident; and, Rooms 68 measured 73.5 sq. ft. per resident. During an interview on 10/11/22, at 12:47 p.m., with the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1, CNA 1 stated residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] needed assistance with transfer. One resident requires Hoyer lift for transfers and CNA 1 stated they have enough space to maneuver the Hoyer lift and provide care for residents in this room. room [ROOM NUMBER], 43 and 68 did not have four residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, four rooms (rooms 24, 33, 43 and 68 ) in the facility did not meet the required 80 square feet per resident.This failure placed the residents in rooms 24, 33, 43 and 68 at potential risk to impede their care and highest possible level of functioning due to smaller than required square footage.Findings: During an interview on 2/19/26, at 11:30 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], with Resident 53, Resident 147, Resident 4 and Resident 11, Resident 53 stated that the room was okay. Resident 53 further stated that he had a good space and did not have a problem with it. Resident 147 and Resident 4 both stated that the room space was good. Resident 11 stated that the room was providing enough space for him. During an interview on 2/20/26, at 8:55 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], with Resident 158, Resident 158 stated that she felt that she had enough space. Resident 158 stated that she felt comfortable with the space and that the space was good. Resident 158 further stated that she felt she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of living space per resident in rooms 24, 33, 43, and 68. This failure had the potential to compromise the residents' care and privacy. Findings: Review of a facility request for the square footage room waiver dated 10/7/24, indicated the following multiple resident bedrooms measured less than 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident: room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 296 sq. ft., providing 74 sq. ft. per resident; room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 286 sq. ft., providing 71.5 sq. ft. per resident; room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 310 sq. ft., providing 77.5 sq. ft. per resident; and, room [ROOM NUMBER] measured 293 sq. ft., providing 73.25 sq. ft. per resident. During an interview on 10/15/24 at 9:08 a.m. with Resident 97, Resident 97 stated when asked about her room, They just moved me here. My things are adequately spaced. During an interview on 10/15/24 at 3:55 p.m. with Resident 118, Resident 118 stated room is huge and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HEFFEL FAMILY PROPERTIES, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2023
DAVIS, DANAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2023
HEFFEL, KENNETHIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/1967
LIPKA, KENDRAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/1985
WRIGHT, COREYIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
FREUND, EDMUNDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$954K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 10%Medicare 9%Other / private 81%

This home reported $954K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$395per resident / day
operating cost
$12,003per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$360per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055481. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next