Palos Verdes Health Care Center
26303 Western Ave., Lomita, CA 90717 · For profit - Individual · 48 certified beds · (310) 784-5440 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $97,006 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-22)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (59%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 1.4% | 0.4% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.53 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 48 beds and averages 43.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.42 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.25 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.52 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement infection control practices to prevent the spread and transmission of multidrug resistant organism (MDROs- microorganisms, predominantly bacteria that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) in the facility for 11 out of 11 sampled residents by failing to: 1.Ensure personal protective equipment (PPE-equipment used to prevent or minimize exposure to hazards) was accessible and readily available to staff while providing direct care to residents at high risk of acquiring MDRO. 2. Ensure 11 residents were placed on Enhance Barrier Precaution (EBP- use of a gown and gloves for residents with wounds, indwelling devices such as a urinary catheter (a flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and to a drainage bag), gastrostomy tube (GT-a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach for food and medication administration) and tracheostomy (a surgical opening in the neck for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, who was transported to a shower room, did not get hit by a shower room door and sustain an injury to a left great toe for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 1) requested assistance to hold the door to Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] while he was pulling Resident 1 on a shower chair into the Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. Ensure CNA 1 and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) reported Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door malfunctioning by documenting about it in the Maintenance Logbook. 3. Ensure CNA 1 and LVN 1 reported to the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) that the door to Shower room [ROOM NUMBER] was not staying wide open to transport the residents safely through the Shower room [ROOM NUMBER]. 3. Ensure MS followed the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Maintenance Service, which indicated The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, who was transported from the medical appointment in a facility van did not fall backwards in a wheelchair and sustained injury for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Driver 1 secured Resident 1 in the van using a four-point straps (secures a wheelchair with four straps attached to the wheelchair at four separate securement points and attached to the vehicle at four separate anchor points) when the resident was in a wheelchair while being transported back to the facility after a medical appointment in the facility's van. 2. Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) who accompanied Resident 1 to her medical appointment was educated on how to properly secure Resident 1 using the four-point straps and the seatbelts (a strap going over the shoulder and torso) when resident was in a wheelchair while being transported in the facility's van. 3. Ensure CNA 1 verified Driver 1 secured Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, who had a history of wandering (a person that roams around and becomes lost or confused about their location) and aggressive behavior (hitting and yelling at others), had 1:1 monitoring (staff that are immediately at hand can help prevent a fall or redirect a patient from engaging in a harmful act) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 1 was monitored for wandering behavior to prevent Resident 1 from physical harm to self and others. 2. Ensure staff followed Resident 1's Care Plan (CP), titled Resident with wandering episodes to constantly monitor the resident's whereabouts and maintain a safe and hazard free environment. 3. Ensure staff followed the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled, Wandering and Elopements (departs the health care facility unsupervised and undetected) to prevent Resident 1 from sustaining injury. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from verbal abuse. The facility failed to:1.Separate Resident 1 and Resident 2 immediately when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 was notified by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 about the alleged verbal abuse and altercation between Resident 1 and Resident 2 on 3/28/2026 at 5:30 a.m.2.Follow the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Resident to Resident Altercation, which indicated the staff will separate the residents if two residents are involved in an altercation and identify what happened.These failures had the potential to put Resident 1 at risk for further verbal abuse, unnecessary anxiety and fear from Resident 2.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse in a timely manner for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to:1. Report allegation of verbal abuse in a timely manner. Resident 1 reported the verbal abuse to Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 on 3/28/2026 at 5:00 a.m. CNA 1 reported it to Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN)1 on 3/28/2026 at around 5:30 a.m. LVN 1 then reported the the allegation to Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS)1 on 3/28/2026 at 7:15 a.m. SOC 341 ( Report of Suspected Dependent Adult -Elder Abuse- California form used by mandatory reporters to officially report suspected abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation of elders 65 years and above) indicated it was faxed on 3/28/2026 at 2:20 p.m.to California Department of Public Health (CDPH).2.Follow the facility's P&P titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation -Reporting and Investigating, which indicated allegations of abuse should be reported immediately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) did not experience loss of dignity during an incontinent brief change after a bowel movement.This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling humiliated and fearful that CNA 1 could have access to his personal information, and Resident 2 feeling anger, upset and violated.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (lack of adequate blood supply to the brain ), seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) affecting the left side, and brain compression (a life threatening condition where increased pressure inside the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-12 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient dietetic (concerning diet and nutrition) oversight for 46 out of 46 sampled residents. The Dietary Supervisor was not working full-time, and the Registered Dietitian was functioning only on a consulting basis. This lack of oversight was evidenced by lapses in food service delivery, including kitchen staff not following the scheduled menu for pureed diets , inaccuracies in therapeutic diets, inadequate maintenance of essential kitchen equipment such as the ice machine and dishwashing machine, and deficiencies in food safety and sanitation practices.These failures had the potential to compromise residents' safety and nutritional status through possible transmission of foodborne illness, incorrect delivery of physician ordered therapeutic diets, and increased risk of aspiration (accidental breathing food, liquid, or saliva into the airway and lungs instead of swallowing into the esophagus and stomach) due to improper food texture.Findings:During the annual recertification survey from 2/9/2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the trash receptacle outside the kitchen was covered, not overflowing, and properly disposed of.This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents, pose health risks, and result in infection control violations.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/09/2026 at 8:40 a.m. with [NAME] 1, the garbage dumpster outside the kitchen was observed to be completely open, with black trash bags overflowing from it. [NAME] 1 stated that this was the kitchen's garbage dumpster.During an interview on 2/11/2026 at 3:50 p.m. with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the RD stated garbage dumpsters must be kept completely closed. The RD stated an open and overflowing dumpster could attract insects and rodents, potentially leading to infestation.During an interview on 2/12/2026 at 1:13 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the garbage dumpster should not be overflowing with trash and must remain covered. The DON stated improper disposal of trash could attract unwanted pests and insects.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to1.Ensure that the water temperature reached the required 160 degrees Fahrenheit ( F- unit of temperature) for proper sanitation when washing residents' laundry in two of three facility washing machines.This failure had the potential to cause cross contamination (the transfer of bacteria, viruses, microorganisms, or other harmful substances from one surface to another through improper or unsanitary equipment, procedures, or products), exposing residents' laundry to bacteria, viruses, and other harmful microorganisms due to inadequate sanitization.2. Review and update facility's policies and procedure for Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP- structured, evidence-based plan used in the facility to stop the spread of germs and protect residents and staff) annually.This failure had the potential to not address current infection trends leading to higher rates of infection in the facility.Findings: 1.During an observation on 2/11/2026 at 12:40 p.m. in the laundry room, two washing machines were running.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of 44 sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 32, Resident 16 and Resident 41) received meals according to the scheduled dietary menu and prescribed diet textures. The facility failed to:1.Ensure Resident 2 and 32 were provided with a pureed fortified meal as scheduled on the facility's dietary menu.2.Ensure Resident 16 and Resident 41 receive the correct texture and consistency of coconut cake during tray line on 2/10/2026 according to their prescribed diet.These failures had the potential to put Resident 2, Resident 32, Resident 16 at risk for not meeting their nutritional needs and Resident 41 at risk for aspiration (accidental breathing of food, fluids, or stomach contents into the airway and lungs instead of the esophagus).Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to seizures(a sudden,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary manner for 44 out of 46 sampled residents in the facility. The facility failed to:1.Ensure reach in refrigerator had an internal thermometer that was in working condition. 2.Ensure dish washing machine was maintained and operated at the proper recommended temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F- unit of measurement).3.Ensure the ice machine was clean and sanitary.4.Ensure [NAME] (CK) 2 washed her hands after touching the lid of a step on trash can before stirring the soup in the stove.5.Ensure an open brown bag of flour and an open bag of pasta were stored in a sanitary manner in the dry storage area.These failure had the potential to cause cross contamination (the transfer of bacteria, viruses, microorganisms, or other harmful substances from one surface to another through improper or unsanitary equipment, procedures, or products), infestation ( presence of an unusually large number of insects or animals in a place that can cause damage or disease) and put residents at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure:1. Two of five residents (Resident 4 and Resident 6) were provided education regarding the risks and benefits of refusing influenza (flu - a contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses that infect the nose, throat, and sometimes the lungs) and pneumococcal (pneumonia - an infection/inflammation in the lungs) vaccines (medications used to prevent diseases).2. One of five residents (Resident 19) was not given the influenza and pneumococcal vaccine.This failure had the potential to result in residents from making informed decisions regarding refusal of influenza and pneumococcal vaccine, increasing the risk for vaccine-preventable illness, complications, hospitalization, and transmission of infection within the facility.Findings:1.a. During a review of Resident 4's Face Sheet (admission Record), the Face Sheet indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 4 on 9/14/2024 and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility's dishwashing machine was maintained in a safe and operational condition. The facility failed to:1.Ensure the dishwashing machine's temperature was running at the recommended temperature of 120 degrees Fahrenheit ( F- unit of measurement).This failure had the potential to increase the risk of cross- contamination (the transfer of bacteria, viruses, microorganisms, or other harmful substances from one surface to another through improper or unsanitary equipment, procedures, or products) and food-borne illnesses (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) among the residents.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/9/2026 at 8:50 a.m., with the Dietary Aide (DA)1, DA 1 ran the dish washing machine and temperature gauge read 104 F. DA 1 stated it was okay to still use the dishwasher even though the temperature gauge was not reaching 120 degrees F as long as the chemical sanitation (using test strips to check the level of sanitizer during the final rinse of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor one of four sampled residents' (Resident 38) right to self determination by not accommodating Resident 38's request to have a shower.This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 38's quality of life.Findings:During an interview on 2/10/2026 at 9:59 a.m., Resident 38 stated she wanted a shower, but staff refused to provide one, and she had not received a shower for some time.During a review of Resident 38's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 38 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia ( a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unsteadiness of feet, and history of falling.During a review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set(MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure missing personal items belonging to one of one sampled resident (Resident 47), including colored pencils and pens used for activities and a personal bottle of hot sauce, were located or replaced.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 47 experiencing frustration or depressed mood due to the facility not returning or replacing the missing items. Findings:During a review of Resident 47's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 47 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to major depressive disorder(mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms), bed confinement and chronic pain.During a review of Resident 47's Physician Progress Notes, dated 11/22/2025, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 5) was free of chemical restraints (use of medication to control a patient's behavior or restrict the patient's movement and not required to treat the medical symptom).The facility failed to:1.Ensure Resident 5 was provided with non-pharmacological interventions (intervention that does not primarily use medicine) before administering as needed (prn) psychotropic medication (any drugs that affects the brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) of Ativan (Lorazepam- medicine used to treat anxiety)2.Ensure psychotropic medication used as a prn for Resident 5 did not exceed 14 days.These failures had the potential to put Resident 5 at risk for adverse consequences (unintended, harmful events attributed to the use of medication) due to unnecessary prolonged use of psychotropic medication affecting Resident 5's quality of life.Findings:During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the recommended ankle brachial index (ABI- painless test that measures blood pressure in your ankles and arms) with arterial doppler (non-invasive, painless ultrasound test that uses sound waves to evaluate blood flow) for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 6) was completed as ordered on 1/28/2026 for a right second toe diabetic ulcer (open sore, commonly on the bottom of the foot, affecting resident with diabetes).This failure resulted in Resident 6 experiencing emotional distress due to uncertainty about whether his toe might require amputation( surgical or traumatic removal of a limb or extremity (arm, leg, finger, toe).Findings:During an observation on 2/9/2026 at 10:05 a.m., at Resident 6's bedside. Resident 6's right second toe was observed to be swollen, black in color with a small amount of blood.During a review of Resident 6's admission Record dated 2/11/2026, the admission Recorded indicated Resident 6 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of two sampled residents (Resident 4), who had limited range of motion ([ROM] full movement potential of a joint [where two bones meet]) and limited mobility, received appropriate treatment and services to increase ROM, prevent further decline, and maintain or improve mobility.This failure had the potential to place Resident 4 at increased risk for further ROM decline and the development of contractures (a permanent tightening of muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff).Findings:During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to cerebral infarction (the death of brain tissue resulting from lack of blood supply), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) had completed required annual competency evaluations.This failure had the potential to result in residents receiving inadequate care and services due to staff not demonstrating current competency.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/12/2026 at 11:06 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the employee file for CNA 3 was reviewed. The file contained no documentation showing completion of the annual competency. The DON stated CNA 3 did not complete the annual competency and confirmed that annual competencies were required each year. The DON stated that without completing the annual competency, CNA 3 would lack updated knowledge and accountability.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Competency of Nursing Staff, dated 3/2025, the P&P indicated All nursing staff must meet the specific competency requirements of their respective licensure and certification requirements defined by state law. In addition, licensed nurses and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA a group of people developing and monitoring quality compliance) Committee, failed to ensure effective oversight of facility operations and failed to ensure implementation of the 2025 Plan of Correction (POC) addressing deficient practices identified during the previous 2025 recertification survey.This failure resulted in repeat deficiencies in food storage, food preparation, and sanitation, as well as failure to ensure required annual in-service training for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) was completed.Findings:During a review of the facility's Statement of Deficiencies, dated 5/18/2025, the statement of deficiencies indicated the following repeat deficiencies in food storage, preparation and sanitation and in the required yearly in-service training (education) for the CNA's.During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/12/2026 at 11:42 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI a data driven proactive approach to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure:a. Education was provided about the benefits and risks of the COVID-19 (an illness caused by the coronavirus and affects the lungs and breathing and can make other parts of the body sick) vaccine for one of five residents (Resident 4) and/or the resident's representative.b. One of five staff (Dietary Aide 1) had documentation containing information demonstrating the staff member had been screened, provided with COVID-19 vaccine education, was offered the vaccine and had their current vaccination status recorded.This failure had the potential to result in residents and staff remaining unprotected against COVID-19, increased risk of serious illness, delayed identification of vaccine status, and missed opportunities to prevent the spread of infection within the facility.Findings:a. During a review of Resident 4's Face Sheet (admission Record), the Face Sheet indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 4 on 9/14/2024 and was re-admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to:1. Ensure adequate room size and space to support the comfort and well being of one of 46 sampled residents (Resident 34).This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 34's quality of life by limiting his ability to move freely and safely within his living space.2. Ensure 18 of 24 residents' rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 102, 103, 104, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 116, 118, 215, 217, 219, 221, 223, 229, 231) met the requirements of 80 square feet for each resident.This failure had the potential to result in inadequate provision of safe nursing care and a lack of privacy for residents.Findings:During a review of Resident 34's admission Record dated 2/12/2026, the admission Record indicated Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), muscle weakness and cerebrovascular accident (CVA stroke,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) completed the required 12 hours of annual in service training.This failure had the potential to result in a lack of, or delay in, necessary care and interventions for residents due to staff not maintaining required knowledge and skills.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/12/2026 at 11:06 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the employee files for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 and CNA 4 were reviewed. The files showed no documentation that CNA 3 completed the required 12 hours of annual nurse aide in-service training. The DON stated that CNA 3 had not completed the required annual in services. The file for CNA 4 showed that the last completion of the required 12 hours of annual in services was on 4/29/2024. The DON stated that the annual 12 hour in service requirement must be completed each year. The DON stated CNAs who do not complete their required in services will lack the necessary knowledge to provide proper care and will have no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-26 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) social security checks were not co-mingled (the mixing or combining of funds or assets from different sources into a single account or pool) into the facility's payroll account when Resident 1's social security checks were directly deposited into the facility's payroll account for six months (7/2021-12/2021).This deficient practice resulted in $27,568.37 of Resident 1's social security checks being deposited into the facility's payroll account and used for employee paychecks.FindingsDuring a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements)During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 4/2/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-26 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure funds for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) were reconciled and returned to Resident 1 within three days of his discharge from the facility (4/28/2024) This deficient practice resulted in multiple social security checks belonging to Resident 1, totaling $27,568.37, being deposited into the facility's payroll account between 7/2021 and 12/2021, without evidence that the funds were deposited to Resident 1's trust account while he was a resident at the facility, or that within 30 days of his discharge from the facility a check was issued to him. This deficient practice had the potential for other resident's funds to be unaccounted for and unreimbursed.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for three of four sampled residents (Resident 17, 35 and 14). The facility failed to: 1. Develop care plan for Resident 17's intentional weight loss. 2. Develop care plan for Resident 35 who was receiving Restorative Nursing Aide ([RNA] nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) services. 3. Develop and implement care plan for Resident 14 who had a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD-a mental health condition that is caused by an extremely stressful or terrifying event). These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services to Resident's 17,35 and 14. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 17's admission Record dated 5/17/2025, the admission Record indicated Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including morbid obesity (excessive body fat that increases…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to: 1.Ensure a tray of multiple individually poured orange juices and cranberry juices in the refrigerator were dated. 2.Ensure trays with multiple individually open containers of fruit in the refrigerator were dated. 3.Ensure a container of cooked ham that had an open date of 4/30/25 and use by 5/10/25 was removed from the refrigerator. 4.Ensure a container of cooked chicken with mushrooms in the refrigerator had a use by date. 5.Ensure that multiple containers filled with cold breakfasts cereals had use by dates. 6.Ensure a bag of cooked fish in the freezer had a use by date. 7.Ensure a bag of cooked roast beef in the freezer had a use by date. These failures had the potential to expose residents to food-borne illnesses (any illness resulting from ingestion of food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, or parasites). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/16/24. at 6:23 p.m., with the [NAME] in the refrigerator and freezer, observed a tray of multiple individually poured orange juices and cranberry juices…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 42) call light was within reach. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 42 not to receive necessary assistance when needed, and experienced loss of self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 42's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (damage to the brain from interruption of its blood supply), and depression ( a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of Resident 42's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/23/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 42 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 42's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], resident assessment tool), dated 2/7/2025, the MDS indicated, Resident 42 required partial/moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-18 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 23) had a recommended Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review evaluation ([PASARR]-a mental health evaluation done to determine if an individual can benefit from specialized mental health services). This failure placed Resident 23 at risk for inappropriate placement, not receiving necessary care, and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record , the admission Record indicated Resident 23 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia(a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), depression (a mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest, and changes in thinking, sleeping, eating, and acting), and seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause uncontrolled jerking, blank stares, and loss of consciousness). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-18 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure annual performance evaluations were completed for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), CNA 1, CNA 2 and CNA 4. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility not to be able to assess areas of weakness identified in performance reviews and skills necessary to provide nursing services to assure resident safety. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/18/25 at 2:45 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), reviewed CNA1, CNA 2 and CNA 4's employee files. The DSD stated that CNA 1 was hired on 12/18/2023, CNA 2 was hired on 5/28/2024 and CNA 4 was hired on 4/24/2013 . The DSD stated CNA 1, CNA 2, and CNA 4 did not have an annual performance evaluation for 2024. The DSD stated that she did not know performance evaluations were done annually. During an interview on 5/18/25 at 5:09 pm with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated performance evaluations should be conducted annually and that they were used to acknowledge the staff's strengths and to help improve any weaknesses.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate of less than five (5) percent, due to improper medication administration for one of six sampled residents (Resident 31). This failure resulted in seven medication errors out of 26 opportunities and a medication administration error rate of 26.92 percent (%) due to Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 failed to administer Resident 31's medication leaving residual medication in the medication cups. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic progressive disease-causing inflammation in the joints and resulting in painful deformity and immobility), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 31's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 31) received the correct dose of hydroxychloroquine (treat rheumatoid arthritis[a chronic progressive disease-causing inflammation in the joints and resulting in painful deformity and immobility] ), vitamin C, memantine (medication used to treat dementia [a progressive state of decline in mental abilities]), metformin ( medication for diabetes mellitus [DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing]), multivitamin-mineral, prednisone ( for rheumatoid arthritis) and senna (medication for constipation) as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 31 to have pain, vitamin C deficiencies, high blood sugar, changes in behavior and constipation. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their protocol for Antibiotic Stewardship (effort to improve how antibiotics are prescribed and used to ensure they are used effectively, reduce overuse, and prevent antibiotic resistance) for one sampled resident (Resident 23). Resident 23 was prescribed an antibiotic drug without meeting the McGreer criteria, after being screened for right eye swelling and tears. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 23 developing antibiotic resistance (not effectively treating infection) from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record , the admission Record indicated Resident 23 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia(a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), depression (a mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest, and changes in thinking, sleeping, eating,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-18 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA ) had completed required dementia and abuse trainings upon hire and annually for four out of four CNA. 1.CNA 1's hire date on 12/18/2023, CNA 1only had four out of the five required hours of dementia training. 2.CNA 2's hire date on 5/28/2024, CNA 2 only had two out of the five required hours of dementia training. 3.CNA 3's hire date on 4/24/2025, CNA 3 had no dementia or abuse training. 4.CNA 4's hire date on 4/29/2013, CNA 4 only had three out of the five required hours of dementia training and had no abuse training. These failures had the potential to put the safety of the residents at risk. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/18/2025 at 2:45 p.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), reviewed CNA 1, CNA 2, CNA 3 and CNA 4's employee files. The DSD stated she was responsible for educating the staff and that all staff were required to receive five hours of dementia training and five hours of abuse training annually. The DSD stated dementia and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure facility staff including Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1 had training and competency evaluation on transporting resident using facility van. This failure resulted in, Resident 1's wheelchair tilted back and hit her head on the van lift when Driver 1 made a left turn towards the facility that was slightly uphill slope. Resident 1 sustained a right occipital (the back of the head) scalp laceration (a cut or tear in the skin or underlying tissue) and hematoma (a pool of mostly clotted blood that forms in an organ, tissue or body space), neck sprain (a soft tissue injury that occurs when a ligament [attach bone to bone] in a joint {two or more bones are connected} is stretched too far or torn) and a right shoulder sprain. Resident 1 was discharged from GACH on 10/1/2024 at 6:56 p.m., to Resident 1's home. This failure had the potential for other resident to fall while being transported in the facility van. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide wound treatment to an existing wound for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), per Resident 1's physician's orders and care plan. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1's right medial leg wound not be treated or assessed, maggots present in Resident 1's wound and Resident 1's transfer to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for evaluation and treatment. This deficient practice had the potential for worsening of the infection to Resident 1's wound resulting in physical as well as psychological harm related to the presence of maggots in Resident 1's right medial leg wound. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus ([DM] a condition associated with abnormally high levels of sugar in the blood). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-17 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted and updated daily. This deficient practice resulted in the inability of residents and visitors to access the facility's staffing information to ensure safe staffing ratios were implemented. Findings: During an observation on 05/14/2024 at 8:12 a.m., observed no posting of nursing hours in any of the two nursing stations. During an interview on 05/14/2024 at 8:15 a.m., the Director of Staff Development (DSD) and the Assistant DSD stated they were not aware of where the nursing hours were posted. DSD stated actual daily staffing hours computed were not posted daily prior to each shift. DSD stated the type of nurses working in each shift was also not posted. During an interview on 05/14/2024 at 10:03 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated nursing hours should be posted in areas visible to both staff and visitors. The DON stated the facility was not posting actual hours of each nursing staff working prior to each shift. During a review of the facility's policy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), were provided the required dementia (a decline in memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking skills that affect a person's ability to perform everyday activities) care training necessary to ensure the continuing competence of the facility's nursing staff's knowledge and skills. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay and interruption of the provision of necessary care and interventions necessary when providing care to dementia residents. Findings: During an interview on 5/16/2024 11:49 a.m., with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2, CNA 2 stated she has not received all dementia care training and she believes that dementia training would help to take better care of residents with dementia. CNA 2 stated the facility has residents with dementia. CNA 2 stated she takes care of dementia residents, and it was difficult taking care of residents with dementia if she was not trained how. During an interview on 5/16/2024 at 1:13 p.m., with CNA 1, CNA 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations form two of three sampled residents (Resident 42 and Resident 16) by failing to: 1.Ensure Resident 42's call light was in functioning condition and able to use. 2. Ensure Resident 16's call light was within reach. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 42 unable to call for assistance when Resident 42 need pain medication and had the potential for Resident 42 and 16 not to receive necessary assistance when needed, and experienced loss of self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 42's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (develops when the lungs can't get enough oxygen into the blood), chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease (when kidneys have become damaged over time), hypertension (high blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (elevated level of lipids). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure three of 14 sampled residents (Resident 21, 4, and t 18) had a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR, an attempt to decrease or discontinue psychotropic (medication that treats mental illness) on psychotropic medications (any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) no more than three months after starting unless clinically contraindicated. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 21, Resident 4 and Resident 18 receiving unnecessary use of psychotropic medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 21 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to anxiety (feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness), depression ( persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest ), schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by reoccurring episodes of psychosis that are correlated with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner to prevent growth of infectious agents that could cause food borne illness (food poisoning: any illness resulting from the food spoilage or contaminating food) for 39 out of 45 total residents in the facility by failing to: 1. Ensure foods were dated, labeled, and discarded before the use by date (expiration dates). This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents and result in pathogen (germ) exposure and placed residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting (throwing up), diarrhea (loose stool) and fever and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/14/2024 at 8:10 a.m., with Dietary Aid (DA) 1 in the kitchen, DA 1 was observed and confirmed there were food items that were not dated and expired in refrigerator and freezer as follows: a. Red pepper, lettuce kept in refrigerator with no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA committees established for the purpose of improving the safety and quality of health services) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI- approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes ) committee failed to implement corrective action to the systemic problems identified: 1. Maintain a system to implement infection control practices including Enhance Barrier Precaution (EBP- use of a gown and gloves for residents with wounds, indwelling devices such as a urinary catheter (a flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and to a drainage bag), gastrostomy tube (GT-a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach for food and medication administration) and tracheostomy (a surgical opening in the neck for breathing) to prevent the spread and transmission of multidrug resistant organism (MDROs- microorganisms, predominantly bacteria that are resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) in the facility 2. A system to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their protocol for Antibiotic Stewardship (define) for five of five sampled residents (Resident 11, 19, 25, 247 and 346) prescribed an antibiotic (medication to treat infection) without meeting the McGeer Criteria (a set of clinical definitions used for surveillance in long-term care facilities. These criteria define the resident symptoms and other clinical criteria that are used to meet infection surveillance definitions). This deficient practice had the potential for resident to develop antibiotic resistance (not effective to treat infection) from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record, indicated Resident 11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including aphasia (brain disorder where a person has trouble speaking or understanding other people speaking) , dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastro-esophageal reflux…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of an unknown source to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) no later than two hours for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) who had swelling and bruising to the right facial cheek area. This deficient pratice had the potential to result in unidentified abuse in the facility and the failure to protect residents from abuse. Findings: During a review of Residents 43's admission Record , dated 5/16/24 , indicated Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses including, hemiplegia (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body), and hemiparesis (mild loss of strength on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction ( blood vessel in the brain that become blocked causing a lack of oxygen) affecting right dominant side, difficulty in walking, cognitive communication deficit, benign neoplasm of the brain (abnormal growth of non-cancerous cells). During a review of resident 43's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 42) humidifier and oxygen tubing were labelled with date change. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 42 at risk of inhaling contaminated mist through the humidifier and can lead to possible respiratory infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 42's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (develops when the lungs can't get enough oxygen into the blood), chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease (when kidneys have become damaged over time), hypertension (high blood pressure), and hyperlipidemia (elevated level of lipids). During a review of Resident 42's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 3/26/2024, indicated Resident 42's had intact cognitive (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a larger sized wheelchair for 1 of 24 residents sampled (Resident 4) to promote mobility and maintain independence. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 4 having an increased decline in physical function. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including lack of coordination (the ability to use different parts of the body together smoothly and efficiently), muscle wasting and atrophy (decrease in size or wasting away of a body part or tissue), difficulty walking, and obesity (having too much body fat). During a review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool), dated 2/2/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 4 was dependent on nursing staff for toileting, lower body dressing, putting on and taking off footwear,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure open date label on morphine sulfate solution (medication for moderate to severe pain) one of one sampled residents (Resident 22). This deficient practice had the potential to placed Resident 22 at risk to received expired medication and result in altered effectiveness of the medication and worsening of the resident's symptoms. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Records, indicated Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of colon (cancer in the large intestine), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), and chronic pain. During a review of Resident 22's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated [DATE], indicated Resident 22's had intact cognitive (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) status and decision-making skills. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review on 9/25/2023 the facility failed to physically assist one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) during a transfer from wheelchair to bed resulting in Resident 1 falling and sustaining injuries. This deficient practice of not providing physical assistance to Resident 1 during a transfer resulted in Resident 1 falling and a subsequent transfer to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for treatment. Resident 1 was diagnosed with and treated for a right tibia (larger bone in the lower leg below the knee) and left tibial nailing (surgery to repair a broken bone to keep it stable) secondary to a displaced fracture (bones that are broken and out of alignment) of left proximal tibial (upper part of the left bone that connects to the knee joint) and fibular ([calf bone] and is the smaller bone in the lower leg that connects between the knee and ankles) diaphysis (midsection of a long bone) and displaced fracture of left tibial and fibular diaphysis with patellar (kneecap) placement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate orientation, specific competencies and skill sets were assessed for registry staff (independent contractors that take care of patients) and Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) necessary to care for wandering residents by failing to: 1. Ensure staff were competent and received in-services before providing care to wandering residents (an impaired resident can move about inside the facility without an appreciation of personal safety needs and possibly enter harm's way) in the facility. 2. Ensure the corrective action stated in the facility's Plan of Correction ([POC- is a document submitted by licensed health care facilities to respond to deficiencies identified in a survey of the facility conducted by state field staff were followed and carried out). These deficient practices have the potential for residents to sustain physical and psychosocial harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), indicated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-18 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 18 of 24 residents' rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 102, 103, 104, 106,I07,108,109,110,215,217,219,221,223,229,231,116,118) met the requirements of 80 square feet for each resident. There were 18 rooms with two beds per room and one room with four beds. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an inadequate provision of safe nursing care, and privacy for the residents. Findings: During an interview on 5/18/2025 at 2:19 p.m., the Administrator (ADMIN) provided the waiver request for room variances. According to the Client Accommodations Analysis form, dated 5/18/2025, the facility had 18 rooms that measured less than 80 square feet per resident. The letter indicated the waiver for room size would not in any way compromise the health, welfare, and safety of the residents. The following resident rooms were: room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 152.39 square feet (sq. ft) Room I02 (2 beds) 155.28 sq. ft. room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 18 of 24 residents' rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 102, 103, 104, 106, 107,108,109,110,215,217,219,221,223,229, 231,116, 118) met the requirements of 80 square feet for each resident. There were 18 rooms with two beds per room and one room with four beds. This deficient practice had the potential to result in an inadequate provision of safe nursing care, and privacy for the residents. Findings: During an interview on 5/14/2021 at 2:19 a.m., the Administrator (ADMIN) provided the waiver request for room variances. According to the Client Accommodations Analysis form, dated 5/14/2024, the facility had 18 rooms that measured less than 80 square feet per resident The letter indicated the waiver for room size would not in any way compromise the health, welfare, and safety of the residents. The following resident rooms were: room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 152.39 square feet (sq. ft) room [ROOM NUMBER] (2 beds) 155.28 sq. ft. room [ROOM NUMBER]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$97,006 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $15,162 — penalty dated 2024-11-22
- $10,851 — penalty dated 2024-10-11
- $70,993 — penalty dated 2024-05-17
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-15 for 70 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALLELO & ASSOCIATES | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/09/1999 |
| LICHT, AMNON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/21/1999 |
| PEREZ, CHRIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/21/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555028. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.