No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lompoc Valley Medical Center Comprehensive Care Ce

216 North Third Street, Lompoc, CA 93436 · Government - Hospital district · 110 certified beds · (805) 736-3466 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (805) 736-3466 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0607, F0610) — most recent Aug 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
101 S B St · (805) 735-6490 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
414 N H St · (805) 922-7999 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
316 E Ocean Ave · (805) 740-2800 · Call to confirm hours
Park
JM Park0.1 mi
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
LFC Kids0.1 mi
125 N C St · (805) 736-2772

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.9%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.1%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.9%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.5%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%1.6%3.3%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.6%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.6%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.3%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.3%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.8%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.7%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine73.9%93.2%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.5%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.3%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.492.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.551.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 164 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 120 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.5%CMS range 53.9–66.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 7.0–12.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge92.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.4%CMS range 3.6–10.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.961.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.21
RN hours/ resident / day
0.94
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.42
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.92
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 99.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.21 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.87 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.33 to 0.92 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-26)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards on food safety when the cook (Cook 1) was observed using his apron to wipe his face with a gloved hand during food tray preparation.This failure had the potential for contamination that may cause Foodborne illness (food poisoning - results from consuming food or drinks contaminated by bacteria, viruses, or parasites).During an observation on 3/23/26 at 12 p.m., in the kitchen during food tray preparation, [NAME] 1 was observed grabbing his apron and wiping his face with his left gloved hand.During an interview on 3/23/26 at 3:30 p.m., with the Food Service Director (FSD), FSD stated that [NAME] 1 should have removed his gloves, washed hands, and then donned on new gloves before proceeding with the food preparation.During the review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Proper Handwashing and Glove Use dated, 2020, the P&P indicated Employees will wash hands before and after handling foods, after touching any part of the uniform, face, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled according to the manufacturer's specifications and facility process/practice.This failure could potentially expose residents to expired supplies with questionable efficacy and the facility could not ensure medications were safely stored to ensure their integrity. During an observation on [DATE], at 7 a.m., in the middle station, a medication cart was observed with the following medications not labeled with the dates of opening:Metamucil 15 oz (425 gram) (a laxative to relieve constipation)Docusate Sodium 100 mg (milligram) (stool softener)Docusate Sodium 50 mg (stool softener)Glucosamine Chondroitin 250 mg (supplement to help ease pain and improve function in osteoarthritis [breakdown of cartilage])Oysco 500 + D3 (supplement for low calcium levels)Vitamin D3 10 mcg (micrograms) (400 IU [International Units]) (supplement that promotes calcium absorption)Folic Acid 400 mcg (supplement for producing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0851 — isolated
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit required staffing and payroll data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) through the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) system (the federally mandated mechanism used by long term care facilities to report staffing information regularly to ensure completeness and accuracy of data submitted to CMS).This facility failure has the potential to result in not having accurate and timely staffing information necessary to evaluate the facility's compliance with federal staffing requirements. Findings:During a review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report, CASPER (Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports) Report 1705D for Quarter 1 of 2025 (October 1 - December 31), it was indicated that the facility failed to submit data for the quarter and subsequently received a one star staffing rating.During an interview conducted on 3/25/26 at 11 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON verbalized they were responsible for submitting staffing information to CMS. The DON further stated that the facility had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility failed to administer a prescribed medication (Bimatoprost - medicine to lower pressure in the eye) and notify the physician per professional standards of practice and facility policy and procedure (P&P) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure led to Resident 2 missing 22 doses of the prescribed medication, and had the potential to cause worsening glaucoma (condition that damages the optic (eye) nerve due to high eye pressure), vision changes, and increased eye pressure.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AD), the AD indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes (disease that affects how the body uses glucose) dementia (brain disorder that affects memory), anxiety, open-angle glaucoma (chronic eye condition characterized by increased pressure in the eye, potentially leading to optic (eye) nerve damage and vision loss) and legal blindness. During a review of Resident 2's physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow professional food storage standards for labeling food in 1 of 1 walk-in freezer in the facility kitchen. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled Procedure For Refrigerated Storage revealed, 10. Leftovers will be covered, labeled and dated. (See leftover policy section 7.). The policy also revealed, 13. Individual packages of refrigerated or frozen food taken from the original packing box need to be labeled and dated. An undated facility policy titled, Food Preparation - Leftover Foods, indicated, Leftover foods are those that have been prepared for a meal and not served. 1. Storage of food B. Label and date. An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 02/03/2025 at 8:47 AM with the Food Nutrition Director (FND). During the tour of the facility's walk-in freezer, one clear, gallon-sized freezer bag of fruit slices and one clear, quart-sized freezer bag with a leftover waffle were observed without any description of the contents or the date the products were opened. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement abuse prevention policy when two residents (Resident 1 and 2) had an alleged abuse incident on 7/17/24 for which no interventions were implemented for two days after the alleged physical abuse incident occured. The facility's failure had the potential for the physical abuse incident to reoccur within those two days. Findings: A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Prevention of Abuse , dated 3/24, indicated 1. It is the policy of this facility to take every proactive measure to prevent the occurrence of alleged abuse of any resident. 2. Residents must not be subject to abuse by anyone, including . other residents. 10. If suspected perpetrator is another resident: Separate the residents so that they do not interact with each other until the circumstances of the reported incident can be determined. 11. All incidents of witnessed, suspected, or alleged abuse are investigated . Facility shall report all incidents of alleged abuse/neglect or suspected abuse/neglect to CDPH within 24 hours and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff was available to answer a resident's call light for one of two residents (Resident 1), when the resident requested assistance to go to the bathroom for toileting needs. This failure had the potential for the resident to be incontinent and also cause psychosocial harm. Findings: During a review of the facility document titled, Nursing Staff Sheet (NSS), dated 4/28/24, the NSS indicated for 3-11 shift (afternoon), the census was 88 and seven certified nursing assistants (CNAs) were scheduled for patient care. The NSS further indicated, each CNA had approximately 12 to 13 residents each to care for. During an interview on 5/13/24 at 10:43 am with the director of nursing (DON), the DON stated, We are not understaffed .We currently do not have any staffing waivers . In this facility the expectation is that anyone that works here and sees or hears a call light they are expected to go in and at least see what the resident needs .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy and procedure (P/P), the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accidents when one of three residents (Resident 1's) wheelchair was not safely maintained. Resident 1's wheelchair left lock was broken. This facility failure resulted in Resident 1's wheelchair sliding backwards and the resident sustaining an assisted fall from the wheelchair. Findings: During a record review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, (a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance) the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), Chronic Kidney Disease (when kidneys cannot filter blood as they should), and Diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). During a review of an assessment form titled, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI - a document utilized to assess the nursing need of a resident),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for one of two residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for further abuse to occur to residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet, (a document that gives a patient's information at a quick glance) the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on 10/11//23 is with a diagnoses that included, Cardiac Arrest (when the heart stops beating suddenly), Heart Failure (condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs), Chronic Kidney Disease (condition in which kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should) and an Aneurysm (an abnormal bulge or ballooning in a blood vessel). During a review of Resident 1's Nursing Progress Note (NPN), dated 12/12/23 at 9:20 a.m., the NPN indicated, Alerted by CNA (certified nursing assistant) Resident 1's responsible party (RP) had phoned the facility while on the phone with Resident 1', she stated, she was going to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), was free from physical restraint when Resident 1 was tied to a wheelchair with a scarf. This facility failure has the potential to cause injury to the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical records titled History and Physical on 8/1/23 at 8:20 p.m., indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hypertension (high blood pressure), ataxia (loss of muscle control in the arms and legs), major depressive disorder, and Dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). Further review of clinical records indicated, Resident 1 is non-verbal, wheelchair bound, requires extensive assistance and supervision. During an interview with Licensed Nurse (LN 1) on 8/3/23, at 3:11 p.m., LN 1 explained that Resident 1 was sitting in the middle nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a call light was within reach, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This facility failure had the potential for Resident 1 not being able to call for help, and a delay in receiving care. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/21/23 at 10:15 a.m. with Resident 1, inside Resident 1 ' s room, Resident 1 was instructed to push the call light (device for residents to be able to request assistance from staff). Resident 1 verbalized, the call light was not within reach. Resident 1 stated would have to get out of the wheelchair and sit on the bed to reach the call light. Resident 1 ' s bed was observed positioned in the corner of the room, against the wall lengthwise with the top right bed rail against the wall, and the head of the bed against the adjoining wall. The call light was vertical, with the upper end of the call light extended from the wall above the top right bed rail, and the bottom end of the call light, which contained the button to push for help, downward on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food and ice in accordance with professional standards when: 1. ambient room temperature foods were not monitored for cooling, and 2. two of three ice machines had a pink substance on the ice machine chute and had not been cleaned and sanitized routinely. These failures had the potential to result in the growth of microorganisms for 79 residents at the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation in the initial kitchen tour on 5/2/22 starting at 10:10 a.m., there was chicken salad dated 4/30/22 and tuna salad dated 4/27/22 located in the sandwich refrigerator. During an interview on 05/3/22 at 10:03 a.m., with [NAME] 2, [NAME] 2 verbalized that she makes the tuna and chicken salad. She stated that the tuna or chicken in can is taken from the dry storage, so it is warm and is mixed with mustard, sometimes dill seasoning and mayo from the fridge if a jar is already open or get a new jar from the dry storage. Once mixed, they store the tuna salad in the refrigerator and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: 1.An order for fingerstick blood sugar (pricking of finger to get blood sample for reading via a small device) for a resident with the condition of Type 2 diabetes (an impairment in the production of insulin- hormone regulating sugar in the blood) was clarified and with physician orders when it was discontinued in one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 24). This failure placed Resident 24 at risk to developed hypoglycemia (low blood sugar ) or hypoglycemia (high blood sugar) with no monitoring and intervention causing a sudden change in the resident's condition. 2. Indwelling urinary care ( IUC-plastice device inserted into the urinary area for urine passage) was documented for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 16). This failure had the potential and risk for uncoordinated and unmonitored IUC care which can affect the resident's overall wellbeing. Findings: 1. Review of [NAME] and [NAME], seventh Edition, Mosby's Fundamentals of Nursing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with impaired upper mobility was provided with other form of communication system or device to call for assistance for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 60). This failure has the potential for Resident 60 to be isolated, and unmonitored for communication needs . Findings: During an observation inside the resident's room on 5/2/22 at 11:20 AM, Resident 60 was sitting on a chair by the right side of the bed with the push call light situated on the left side of the bed. During an interview on 5/2/22 at 11:29 AM, with the director of rehab (DOR),the DOR indicated Resident 60 has contractures (stiff, hard muscles, bones) on the upper extremities ,not able use the regular push call light and an adaptive device should be in place. During the review of the resident's minimun data sheet (MDS -assessment) dated 1/22/22, Resident 60 requires extensive to total dependence on staff for activities of daily living ( ADLS -hygiene, eating, bathing, toileting) with limitation on the upper and lower extremities, and able…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure: 1. Hydration needs were met for Resident 61 when a water pitcher was not accessible to the resident. This failure placed the resident at for dehydration (lack of fluids body needs daily). 2. Nutritional needs were met for Resident 77 when meal intakes were not documented accurately for the resident. This failure placed the resident at risk for for weight loss and malnutrition ( inadequate nutritional consumption). Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/2/22, at 11:30 a.m., with Resident 61's representative (RP 1), in Resident 61's room ,109-A, RP 1 verbalized Resident 61 had a stroke and has right sided paralysis. RP 1 verbalized Resident 61's belongings and bedside table are on the right side of the bed. Resident 61's bed was observed to be next to the wall on the left side of the room, the bedside table was on the right side of bed, with a water pitcher. RP 1 verbalized Resident 61 cannot use her right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents with dementia (impaired memory) and taking psychotropic medications (mood and behavior modification medications) were monitored for possible side effects or adverse reactions that might cause some altered level of consciousness, falls, changes in movement and overall condition in two of 18 sample residents (Residents 24 and 48). This failure placed the residents at risk for changes in condition that had the potential to impeded their ability to attain their highest psychosocial , physical and mental wellbeing. Findings: 1.The facility policy titled Behavior Modification Drug Use revised 7/18 indicated in part .6) The resident's behaviors will be observed and documented. 7) Adverse side effects will be observed for and documented . During a review of the clinical record for Resident 24 , the admission record indicated the diagnoses including but not limited to unspecified dementia). The physician order dated 2/17/22, had an order for the resident to be administered Celexa (Citalopram - an antidepressant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure medications are not expired for one unsampled resident (Resident 19). This failure had the potential for the resident to be medicated with a medication that has no strength or effectiveness to treat. Findings: During an observation, record review, and interview on 5/03/22 at 9:05 a.m. with licensed nurse 3 (LN3) and LN1, LN3 was preparing Resident 19's medication for administration. One of the resident' scheduled medications included a blister pack (unit dose package) of Nuplazid, 34 mg per capsule (pimavanserin-antipsychotic medication used as treatment for hallucinations) with an order date of 6/17/21. The direction on the blister pack read . one capsule by mouth every day and the expiration date is 12/14/21. LN3 reviewed the blister pack and indicated the blister pack was provided by family . LN3 stated It is the responsibility of the nurse giving the medication to find and remove expired medications from the medication carts. No expired medications should be in the medication carts or in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate food preferences for two residents (Resident 76 and 30). This failure had the potential not to meet residents' food preferences and may lead to a decreased meal intake and nutritional consequences. Findings: 1. During a review of the lunch meal on 5/3/22, indicated pork medallions, company potatoes, braised red and green cabbage, wheat dinner roll and blonde brownies. During an observation on 5/3/22 at 12:09 p.m., of the lunch meal service , Resident 76's meal ticket indicated a low fiber, dysphagia 3, 2g Na diet. The tray ticket showed a hand-written note for tamales. The lunch tray was observed with potatoes, carrots, ground pork, no cabbage, and no tamales. During an observation of Resident 76's lunch tray and concurrent interview with Dietary Aide (DAI#1) on 5/3/22 at 12:22 p.m., he acknowledged there should have been a tamale and no ground pork on the tray. During an interview on 5/04/22 at 9:16 a.m., with the Dietary Director (DD), DD verbalized that regarding food preferences, the meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed when: 1.An employee entered a resident's room (Resident 230 room [ROOM NUMBER]-A) without donning (to put on) appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) when the resident was on transmission-based precautions for Covid-19 (acute respiratory illness in humans caused by the coronavirus). 2. Resident 70's foley catheter (device inserted in the urinary area for urine passage) collection bag was touching the floor. 3. Resident 70's nasal cannula tubing (NC- device to deliver supplemental oxygen to the nostrils) was not dated. 4. Staff stored personal items in medication cart containing resident medications. 5. Soiled equipment not separated from patient access area, in direct contact with clean hand hygiene/mask station, and in contact with delivery boxes of resident supplies. These failures had the potential to transmit and spread infection to residents, visitors, and staff. Findings:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LOMPOC VALLEY MEDICAL CENTEROrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1967
BAILEY, ROLLINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/1990
ROCK, DEBORAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/1985
CHENEY, DUSTINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
COPE, YVETTEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/04/2024
FEMENELLA, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/15/2017
MILLS, LELANDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/04/2015
RAGGIO, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/1998

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055256. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next