No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Beach Post-Acute

2725 Pacific Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90806 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (562) 427-7493 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (562) 427-7493 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Sep 20242 actual-harm citations$139,865 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $139,865 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-22)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2777 Long Beach Blvd · (562) 595-5653 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
233 E Willow St · (562) 989-9868 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
101 E Willow St · (562) 988-8785 · Call to confirm hours
Park
434 E Willow St · (562) 570-3100 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.2%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.3%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.0%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.1%1.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.7%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.1%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.2%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.7%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.8%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission36.2%23.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.2%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.832.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.531.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.4%CMS range 37.7–64.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.1–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge84.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 4.5–15.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
1.16
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.42
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.99
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
25.6%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 83.5 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-13)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IIDR2024-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was under conservatorship (a legal status in which a judge appoints a person [conservator] to manage the financial and personal affairs of a minor or incapacitated person) with a history of elopement (an unauthorized departure of a patient from an around-the-clock care setting without the facility's knowledge and supervision), and assessed as high risk for elopement, did not elope from the facility for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 1 did not elope from the facility twice, the first time on 1/19/2024 and again 4/13/2024. 2. Ensure Resident 1 was not placed in a room with access to an outside patio with a door that opened to an alley. The door's alarm, when sounded, was faint and could be heard only when in close proximity to it and would shut off within five seconds after activation. 3. Have a system in place to alert staff when the facility's front entrance/exit door as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was admitted to the facility for pain management, from a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) following two spinal fusion (a surgical procedure to connect two or more bones in the lower part of the spine) surgeries, was medicated to control the pain for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). The facility failed to: 1. Provide Dilaudid (a narcotic medication used to treat moderate to severe pain), for approximately six hours, to Resident 1 who complained of a pain level of 10 out 10 on a 0-10 pain rating scale (where zero= no pain and 10= is the worst pain possible). 2. Follow up with the pharmacy to confirm the pharmacy received the fax order for Dilaudid. 3. Contact Resident 1's physician and/or the facility's pharmacy to request access to the facility's Emergency Kit ([E-Kit] a kit containing a small supply of medication that can be dispensed when the medication is not available from the pharmacy) in order to obtain Dilaudid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents, Resident (5) was permitted to return to the facility. The facility failed to:1.Readmit Resident 1 to the facility after Resident 5 was evaluated and cleared by general acute care hospital (IGACH) to return to the facility on [DATE].2.Implement facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Bed-Holds (a resident's right to keep a bed vacant and available for seven days after their transfer to the hospital in anticipation of their return to the facility) and Returns, dated 10/2022, which indicated residents who seek to return to the facility after the state bed-hold period has expired are allowed to return to their previous room if available or immediately to the first available bed in a semi-private room.3. Ensure Resident 5 received the required bed hold policy and notification form at the time of his transfer on [DATE] to general acute care hospital (GACH).These deficient practices resulted in Resident 5 being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one of one residents reviewed for falls (Resident 1). The facility failed to:1. Ensure Resident 1 who was assessed as high fall risk and needs substantial/ maximal assistance with ambulation received assistance during ambulation on 3/19/2026 and 3/21/2026.This failure resulted in two unwitnessed falls in the hallway, including one fall causing a right elbow laceration, and placed Resident 1 at further risk for injury.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 with diagnoses of but not limited to abnormalities of the gait, and mobility, abnormal posture, end stage renal disease, (ESRD-irreversible kidney failure) and diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) did not miss her hemodialysis ([HD] a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) treatments as ordered and failed to implement Resident 1's care plan which included monitoring Resident 1 for changes in level of consciousness, abnormal vital signs (essential measurements taken by the healthcare team providers to check the body's most basic and life sustaining functions), heart and lung sounds, edema (swelling caused by excess fluid building up in the body's tissues). These failures resulted in Resident 1 presenting to the dialysis center on 2/16/2026 with facial and generalized body edema. Resident 1 was above the prescribed target weight of 63 kilograms ([kg] metric unit of measurement for mass/weight), weighing 74 kilograms. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 to have pulmonary edema (excess fluid buildup in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who was experiencing pain, pain level (an eleven point scale where pain is rated from zero to 10; 0=no pain, 1-3=mild pain, 4-6=moderate pain, and 7-10=severe pain, and 10=worst imaginable pain) was accurately documented by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1's pain level not being identified and had the potential for delayed pain relief and impaired communication among facility staff.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 had diagnoses including joint (where to or more bones meet) replacement surgery (a procedure in which a surgeon removes the damaged parts of a joint and replaces them with an artificial joint) and end stage renal disease ([ESRD] irreversible kidney failure) with hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they were free from roaches. This deficient practice resulted in a report of roaches in one of three sampled residents' (Resident 1) room, and observations of live and dead roaches in the facility's staff breakroom. This deficient practice had the potential for a roach infestation to occur affecting residents' health and wellbeing.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1 had a diagnosis of anoxic brain damage (when the brain is completely deprived of oxygen causing cell death). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a resident assessment tool) dated 12/16/2025 the MDS indicated Resident 1's cognition was moderately impaired. Resident 1 was dependent (helper does all the effort) on staff for toilet hygiene, shower/bath, lower body dressing and needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain and observe infection control practices by failing to:1.Ensure Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2 wore an isolation gown (protective apparel used to protect the wearer from the transfer of microorganisms and body fluids) while assisting with fixing linens for Resident 41 which required direct contact with Resident 41 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control intervention using gown and gloves during high contact resident care activities designed to reduce the transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms {microorganisms, predominantly bacteria, that are resistant to one of more classes of antimicrobial agents}).2.Ensure the oxygen tubing was changed and dated for Resident 42.3.Ensure the intravenous (IV- administering fluids, medications, or nutrients directly into a vein using a needle or tube) site was changed and dated for Resident 47.4.Ensure CNA 2 performed hand hygiene when passing meal trays.These failures had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term) for one of three residents (Resident 63).This failure had the potential to result in an inappropriate placement and delay of services needed for Resident 63.Findings:During a review of Resident 63's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior) and colitis (inflammation in your colon).During a review of Resident 63's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 12/23/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 63's cognition (ability to think, understand, learn, and remember) was intact and required moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with toileting, showering, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an annual competency assessment (a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics in performing that an individual need to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully) checks for one of three employees (Registered Nurse Supervisor) were performed every year.This deficient practice had the potential for the facility not able to assess the skills, knowledge, training, and certification necessary to provide nursing services to assure resident safety and adequate resident care.Findings:During a record review on 02/11/2026 at 1:38 p.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), there were no records of annual competency training that was done in employee file for RNS 1 for 2025. RNS1 was hired in 2022 as an Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) and was hired as RN in 2024 working day shift.During a follow up interview on 02/11/2026 at 3:27 pm with the DSD, The DSD stated it was very important to perform competency evaluation annually to know if staff are competent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications removed from the emergency kit (E Kit-collection of different types of medications in a small box for emergency use supplied by pharmacy to health care organizations) were entered in the communication form and promptly replaced.Augmentin ( a combination of antibiotic that contains two active ingredients: amoxicillin (the primary germ-fighter) and clavulanic acid 125 milligram (mg-unit of measurement) removed from the E-kit (date and time unknown) and Keflex 250 mg (antibiotic use to kill a wide range of bacteria), medications removed from the emergency kit (E Kit-collection of different types of medications in a small box for emergency use supplied by pharmacy to health care organizations) on [DATE] at 1:30 p.m.This failure had the potential to leave the facility without STAT (immediately) Augmentin 125 mg and Keflex 250 mg in the E Kit if another resident required these antibiotics urgently as prescribed by a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a binding arbitration agreement (out-of-court process where a neutral third party hears a dispute and makes a final, legally binding decision) was explained in a form and manner that the resident's representative ([RR]- an individual chosen by the resident to act on behalf of the resident in order to support the resident in decision-making; access medical, social or other personal information of the resident) could understand prior to obtaining a signature for one of three resident's (Resident 15).This failure had the potential to result in the resident or resident representative unknowingly waiving the right to pursue disputes through the judicial system, thereby limiting legal rights and protections.Findings:During a review of Resident 15's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and paranoid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide implement post fall interventions for one of three sample residents (Resident 1). Facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 1's bed was maintained in the lowest position to help prevent additional falls. This deficient practice placed Resident 1, identified as a fall risk, at increased risk for further falls and potential injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), hemiparesis ( a condition that causes partial paralysis or weakness on one side of the body) following intracranial hemorrhage (a bleeding inside the skull from a ruptured blood vessel ) affecting left dominant side. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] resident assessment tool), dated 11/24/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1's had severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with dignity and respect during personal care. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) used derogatory and offensive language toward Resident 1, including statements such as It smells bad and stinkyThis failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling humiliated, insulted, and emotionally distressed. The resident reported staying awake all night due to the incident on 11/29/2025.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including broken left leg, broken left wrist and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 11/21/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to make decisions for herself. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool), dated 11/26/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the following for two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 5): 1. Failed to ensure Resident 1 did not develop a Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD: skin inflammation caused by prolonged exposure to various sources of moisture such as urine and stool) to her peri-area (region between the buttocks and female reproductive area). 2. Failed to ensure Resident 1's family was able to contact Resident 1 via telephone while residing in the facility. 3. Failed to address ongoing concerns expressed in written grievances for answering call lights for Resident 1 and Resident 5. A. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility 5/9/2025 with diagnoses including dislocation of right shoulder joint (two or more bones connect), injury of axillary (armpit) artery (major blood vessel in the upper limb that supplies blood to shoulder and arm put) on right side,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of four sampled residents (Resident 2) received care and services to promote wound healing and to prevent worsening pressure injuries (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) from occurring by failing to implement interventions such as a special low air-loss mattress (designed to prevent pressure injuries, treat pressure injuries) and vitamin supplements such as zinc (mineral that plays a crucial role in numerous bodily functions, including immune system support and wound healing), vitamin C (form protein called collagen to make skin and blood vessels), and a multivitamin (dietary supplement that provides foundational support for daily nutritional needs that is not taken through diet) to promote wound healing for Resident 2. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2's sacrococcyx (fused bone structure that consist of the sacrum [triangular bone at the base of the spine]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician and Responsible Party (RP) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a history of gastrointestinal bleeding ([GI] bleeding anywhere in the digestive tract from the mouth to the rectum), anemia (when the blood doesn ' t have enough healthy red blood cells and hemoglobin [a protein in the red blood cells that carries oxygen) to carry oxygen all through the body], and a low hemoglobin, were notified when Resident 1 refused to have his blood drawn in order to obtain a Complete Blood Count ([CBC] a common blood test that measures red blood cells {specialized cells in the blood that play a crucial role in transporting oxygen throughout the body}, white blood cells {a type of blood cell that play a crucial role in the body ' s immune system}, platelets {a tiny disc shaped pieces of cells in the blood that help stop bleeding by forming clots [a mass of blood that forms when clot platelets, proteins, and cells stick together]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly identify and intervene to ensure Resident 1 received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards and their comprehensive person-centered care plan when two physician's orders for Stat (immediately) laboratory (lab) tests were not completed within the required time frame for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for gastrointestinal bleeding ([GI] bleeding anywhere in the digestive tract from the mouth to the rectum). The physician placed a STAT order for Complete Blood Count ([CBC] a common blood test that measures red blood cells {specialized cells in the blood that play a crucial role in transporting oxygen throughout the body}, white blood cells {a type of blood cell that play a crucial role in the body's immune system}, platelets {a tiny disc shaped pieces of cells in the blood that help stop bleeding by forming clots [a mass of blood that forms when clot platelets, proteins, and cells stick together] when a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three out of three sampled residents, Residents 26,31 and 61 who were receiving hemodialysis (clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) treatments had an emergency dialysis kits (supplies needed to use in an emergency) at bedside, to respond to a potential medical complication, such as bleeding. This failure had the potential to cause a delay in treatment in case of an emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 61s admission Record, dated 1/10/2025, the admission record indicated, Resident 61 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD-irreversible kidney failure), dependence on renal dialysis and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 61's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 1/2/2025 the MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a label of open date and use by dates were placed on an open bag of frozen pancakes and cinnamon rolls. This failure had the potential to expose residents to a food-borne illnesses (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods). Findings: During an observation 1/07/2025 at 8:10 a.m. in the kitchen freezer an open bag of pancakes and cinnamon rolls did not have a label of open date or use by date on the bag. During an interview on 1/7/2025 at 8:10 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the DS stated that there was not a label of open date or use by date on the open bag of pancakes or cinnamon rolls. DS stated there always needs to be label of open date and use by date on food after it has been opened to ensure the quality of the food was good and palatable for the residents. During an interview on 1/10/2025 at 2:34 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated all open food needs to have a label of open date and best by date to ensure the food was fresh. The DON stated there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of 18 sampled residents Resident 40 had an updated Pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR - a federal assessment requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are placed in facilities that can provide the appropriate care) to reflect Resident 40's medical condition. This failure had the potential to result in inappropriate placement and unidentified specialized services for Resident 40. Findings: During a review of Resident 40' s admission Record, dated 1/10/2025 the admission Record indicated, Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including psychoses (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions ae so affected that contact is lost with reality) and anxiety (emotion characterized by feelings of tension, worried thoughts). During a review of Resident 40's Minimum Data Set ({MDS}- a resident assessment tool) dated 12/26/25 the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide daily wound care treatment and services for one of five sampled residents (Resident 41) per physician order. This failure had the potential for Resident 41 wound to worsen and delay wound healing. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, gastrostomy tube (GT-surgical opening that allows for nutritional support or stomach drainage), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD-is a chronic lung disease that causes breathing difficulties.), muscle weakness ( loss of muscle strength), pressure ulcer (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) of the right heel. During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set (a resident assessment tool) dated 11/8/2024 indicated Resident 41 was able to make self-understood, and able to understand others. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 37), received the Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA, certified nursing aide program that helps residents to maintain their function and joint mobility) program as recommended by the physical therapist (PT, licensed professional aimed in the restoration, maintenance, and promotion of optimal physical function) on 12/12/2024. This failure had the potential to result in range of motion [ROM, full movement potential of a joint (where two bones meet)] decline and contracture (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints). Findings: During a review of Resident 37's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including amputations a surgical procedure that removes a limb or part of a limb) of the left and right leg below the knee, muscle weakness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one out of 21 sampled residents (Resident 31) received a new upper and lower denture as recommended by Resident 31's dentist on 8/22/2024. This failure had the potential to result in the inability to effectively chew foods, weight loss, and low self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 31's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), end stage renal disease (ESRD-irreversible kidney failure), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and severe protein calorie malnutrition (a condition where a person is severely deficient in both protein and calories). During a review of Resident 31's Order Summary Report, dated 7/1/2024, the Order Summary Report indicated, Resident 31 may have a dental consultation with follow up treatment as needed. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures by not ensuring Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 perform hand hygiene for one out of five sample residents (Resident 41). This failure had the potential to result in cross contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and place the residents at risk for the spread of infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, gastrostomy status (surgical opening that allows for nutritional support or stomach drainage), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ( COPD-is a chronic lung disease that causes breathing difficulties.), muscle weakness ( loss of muscle strength), pressure ulcer (localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Antibiotic Stewardship Program (measures used by the facility to ensure antibiotics [drug to treat infection] are used only when necessary and appropriate) for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 42). This failure had the potential to put Resident 42 at risk for antibiotic resistance (when bacteria change to resist antibiotics used to effectively treat them) and inappropriate use of antibiotic. Findings: During a review of Resident 42's admission Record, the admission Record indicated, Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including left temporomandibular joint disorder (a condition that affects the joint that connects the jaw to the [NAME] and causes pain and discomfort in the jaw, face, neck and shoulders.), muscle weakness and chronic viral hepatitis C (a lifelong liver infection caused by the hepatitis C virus). During a review of Resident 42's Physician Progress Notes History and Physical, dated 12/23/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure two out of five sampled residents, Residents 42 and 71 were provided with education regarding the risk and benefits of refusing an influenza (Flu-a contagious respiratory illness), pneumonia (PNA-an infection of the lungs), Corona virus-19 (COVID 19 virus that causes fever and cough) vaccine (medication to prevent a particular disease). This failure violated the resident or responsible party's rights to make an informed decision and placed two residents at a higher risk of acquiring and transmitting the influenza, pneumonia and COVID19 to other vulnerable and immunocompromised (a weak immune system) residents in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 42's admission Record, dated 1/10/2025, the admission Record indicated, Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hepatitis c (a viral infection of the liver that leads to illness and can be spread by contact with the contaminated blood), asthma (airways…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was revised when Resident 1 had two unwitnessed falls on 10/4/2024 and 10/12/24 and the fall risk assessments on 9/17/2024 and 10/14/2024 identified Resident 1 as high risk for falls. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 ' s third unwitnessed fall and subsequent injury on 10/17/2024, when Resident 1 was found on the floor with bleeding on the top of the right side of his head, and later at a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) was assessed with a subdural hematoma (bleeding in the area between the brain and the skull Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Parkinsonism (an umbrella term that refers to brain conditions that cause slowed movements, rigidity [stiffness] and tremors), osteoporosis (a condition in which bones become weak and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to be free from physical abuse for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 hitting Resident 1 on the right knee twice. Findings: a. During a review of the Resident 1 ' s admission record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pancytopenia (condition in which there is a significant reduction in the number of blood forming cells), hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure (progressive heart disease affecting function of the heart), end stage renal disease (ESRD: chronic condition in which the kidneys lose the ability to remove waste and fluids), abnormalities of gait and mobility, and Type II Diabetes (diseases that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set [(MDS) a standardized assessment and care screening tool], dated 7/5/2024, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate a person-centered base line care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) for a behavior of throwing water at her previous roommate. This deficient practice potentially led to Resident 2's agression not being addressed and escalating, compromising other residents' safety. Findings; During a review of the Resident 2 ' s Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (immobility of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), major depressive disorder (serious mental illness that affects how a person feels and acts), anxiety (unpleasant feeling of fear or uneasiness) disorder, and Type II Diabetes. During a review of Resident 2 ' s miminum data set (MDS-a standardized assesment and care screening tool) dated 7/11/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 2 ' s cognitive skills were intact. The MDS indicated Resident 2 was dependent in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure call light was answered in a timely manner for two of two sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 4). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 and Resident 4 sitting in their urine and feces for a long period of time and has the potential for Resident 2 and Resident 4 to feel embarrassed and humiliated. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus type 2 (a condition in which the body fails to process glucose (sugar) correctly) depression (serious mental health condition that involves a persistent low mood or loss of interest in activities), and transient ischemic attack (blockage of blood flow to the brain) During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS comprehensive assessment and care screening tool), dated 6/12/ 2024, the MDS indicated Resident 2 was able to understand and make decisions. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0559 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled Residents (Residents 2 and 5) and/or their Responsible Parties (RPs) were informed and/or provided a written notice when Resident 2 and 5's rooms were changed. These deficient practices resulted in Residents 2 and 5 and/or their RPs not being given the option to accept or decline the room change and being unaware of and not knowing why Resident 2 and 5's rooms were changed. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including unspecified dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions which interfere with doing everyday activities) and major depressive disorder ([MDD] a mood disorder which causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H/P) dated 7/22/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 2 could make his needs known but could…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure six of eight sampled residents (Residents 2, 3, 4, 7, 8 and 9) were not verbally abused by Resident 1 after the facility continued to allow residents to reside with Resident 1 despite having a history of threatening and harassing behavior's with his roommates. These deficient practices resulted in Residents 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, and Resident 9 being subjected to Resident 1's verbal abuse, bullying, harassment, and intimidating behavior. These deficient practices had the potential for other resident's admitted to Resident 1's room to suffer verbal abuse. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including paraplegia (a chronic [lasting for a long time or constantly recurring] condition which causes a loss of muscle function in the lower half of the body, including both legs), depression (a mental health condition which causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report four allegations of resident to resident verbal abuse to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (a public advocate) and local law enforcement, within the regulated time frame of two hours for four of five sampled residents (Resident's 2, 4, 8, and 9). These deficient practices resulted in CDPH not being aware of the abuse allegations that occurred between 2/22/2024 and 8/1/2024 until 8/6/2024 and the inability to investigation the allegations. These deficient practices had the potential for pertinent information to be lost and/or forgotten, more allegations of abuse to go unreported. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including paraplegia (a chronic [lasting for a long time or constantly recurring] condition which causes a loss of muscle function in the lower half of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for one sampled resident (Resident 1), who had a history of verbal abuse, threats, and harassment towards residents who were admitted in his room, to include not allowing admission of other residents to Resident 1's room. This deficient practice resulted in subjecting Residents 2, 3, 4, 8, and 9, who were admitted to Resident 1's room, to Resident 1's known and continued behavior of verbal abuse, threats, and harassment. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including paraplegia (a chronic [lasting for a long time or constantly recurring] condition which causes a loss of muscle function in the lower half of the body, including both legs), depression (a mental health condition which causes persistent feeling of sadness, and loss of interest in activities a person normally enjoys), and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart (a movable piece of equipment used in healthcare facilities to store, transport, and dispense medicines, medical supplies, and emergency equipment), located on Station two was locked. This deficient practice resulted in unsecured medications and had the potential for resident's, visitors, and other unauthorized staff to access medications that were left unsecured and out of visual sight of the licensed nurse assigned to the medication cart, which could lead to theft, loss, and/or ingestion of medications not intended for resident's use. Findings: During an observation on 8/6/2024 at 12:11 p.m., on the Station two hallway, an unlocked and unattended medication cart was observed. During an interview on 8/6/2024 at 12:12 p.m., Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) stated she forgot to lock the medication cart prior to stepping away from it. LVN 1 stated if the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended, everyone in the facility had access to the medications in the cart. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was not verbally abused by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1), when CNA 1, during Resident 1's physical therapy ([PT] a branch of rehabilitative health that uses exercise and equipment to help patients improve their physical abilities) spoke to Resident 1 using a curse word in a loud, angry, and aggressive tone, in a foreign language that Resident 1 happened to understand. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1's hurt feelings, because he (Resident 1) was making an effort to do the rehabilitation (a set of interventions designed to optimize functioning and reduce disability in individuals with health conditions) exercises and CNA 1 didn't have to curse at him. This deficient practice had the potential for other episodes of verbal abuse to occur. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was conducted following two separate allegations of abuse by one sampled resident (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted in the facility not identifying other potential residents who may have been affected by abuse and had the potential for the facility not to be able to determine if abuse actually occurred. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including right hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move on one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction ([stroke] damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 3/22/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 1's cognition (thought process) was intact. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident to resident physical abuse to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and the State Long Term Care Ombudsman ([LTC] public advocate) within the regulated time frame of two hours and they failed to report the results of their investigation to CDPH within five working days of the incident for one of two sampled residents (Resident 4). This deficient practice resulted CDPH not being aware of the abuse allegation that occurred 1/2024 until 4/2024 and the inability to investigation the allegation. This deficient practice had the potential for pertinent information to be lost and/or forgotten, more allegations of abuse to go unreported and continued abuse to occur. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid (a pattern of behavior where a person feels distrustful and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance ([QAA] a committee that develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies) and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement ([QAPI] a committee that takes a systematic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data-driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes while involving residents and families, and all nursing home caregivers in practical and creative problem solving) committee failed to identify Resident 1's elopement (a situation in which a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without the facility's knowledge and supervision) on 1/19/2024. They failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to ensure the QAA/QAPI committee systematically implemented and evaluated measures to monitor, review, and analyze data for performance improvement regarding elopements to help prevent the reoccurrence of incidents of elopement and include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a prior history of three strokes. This deficient practice resulted in the care needs of Resident 1, related to prior history of strokes, not being addressed and had the potential for care interventions to not be implemented that would provide Resident 1 with appropriate care to recognize changes in Resident 1 ' s health status, assess, monitor, and/or prevent a recurrence of Resident 1 ' s stroke. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (a stroke that occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it) with left sided hemiplegia (paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), respiratory failure with hypoxia (develops when the lungs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a change of condition (COC) and was found lethargic (decreased level of consciousness similar to sleepiness, fatigue, or drowsiness) on 2/19/2024 at 1:06 p.m., was continually assessed, monitored and documentation of Resident 1 ' s status was completed. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 ' s medical status being unknown by nursing staff from 1:06 p.m. through 5:39 p.m., on 2/19/2024 (four hours and 30 minutes after Resident 1 was assessed as lethargic), no assessment conducted to determine the cause of Resident 1 ' s lethargy and/or as a baseline assessment, such as a blood sugar (b/s) check and neurological assessment (an assessments to identify if there is a change to the resident ' s level of consciousness). Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance ([QAA] a group which develops and implements appropriate plans of action to correct identified quality deficiencies) committee and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement ([QAPI] a group who takes a systemic, interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and data driven approach to maintaining and improving safety and quality in nursing homes while involving residents and families, and all nursing home caregivers in practical and creative problem solving) committee failed to implement corrective action from their recent re-recertification survey (12/22/2023) focused on monitoring, treating, and evaluating residents' pain. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 experiencing increased, unrelieved severe pain for approximately 6 hours which had the potential to affect Resident 1's sleep, appetite, mental health and delay her recovery. Findings: During a review of the CMS 2567 Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction (POC)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to sufficiently train one of four licensed nurses, Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1), regarding pain management when LVN 1: 1. Failed to monitor, assess, and document interventions provided to Resident 1 to alleviate the pain, when Resident 1 complained of 10/10 pain. 2. Failed to access the medications in the emergency medication kit (E-Kit, medication kit which contains a small supply of medication that can be dispensed when the medication is not available from the pharmacy) because of lack of knowledge regarding when to use the E-Kit, how to access the medications and the protocol/procedure necessary to obtain the medications from the E-kit. 3. Failed to contact Resident 1's physician and/or the facility's pharmacy to request access to the emergency kit (E-Kit) to obtain Dilaudid, per the facility ' s policy and procedure, to administer to Resident 1 for pain. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 to experience unrelieved 10/10 burning pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) administered medication ([Lenalidomide] a medication used to treat cancer) on time, to one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) when LVN 2 administered Lenalidomide to Resident 2 at 11:28 a.m., instead of 9 a.m., as prescribed and no later than 10 a.m. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 receiving Lenalidomide two hours and 30 minutes after the ordered administration time and one hours and 30 minutes after the accepted administration time, which had the potential for mismanagement of Resident 1's medication regimen. Findings During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain cancer). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 1/2/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 2 was able…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the food preference for one sampled resident (Resident 2) when they served him rice and chicken for lunch when his tray card indicated Resident 2 disliked rice and chicken breast. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 purchasing his own food and had the potential for Resident 1 to go without food and potentially lose weight. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain cancer). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 1/2/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 2's was able to make independent decisions that were reasonable and consistent. During a record review of Resident 2's tray card (a list that provides specific resident diet order, food preferences, dislikes, and allergies) dated 2/13/2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control measures for 0ne sampled residents (Resident 2) when Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 (LVN 2) administered Tramadol 1 tablet (a pain medication) to Resident 2 after the tablet fell onto the top of a dirty medication cart. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 ingesting medication that was potentially contaminated and had the potential to lead to health related issues. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the brain (brain cancer). During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 1/2/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 2's was able to make independent decisions that were reasonable and consistent. During a review of Resident 2's Physician's Order dated 11/03/2023, the Physician's Order indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 383 and Resident 183) who were identified high risk for fall, when Resident 383's and 183's bed was not in the lowest position and one of eight sampled residents (Resident 51) was at the smoking area without supervision and with unsafe keeping of smoking materials (cigarette and lighter). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 383 and 183 to sustain an injury due to a fall and Resident 51 to accidently burn while smoking. Findings: a) During a review of Resident 383's admission Record indicated, Resident 383 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified hallucinations (sensations of hearing, seeing, smelling, tasting, feeling, or thinking that are not real), and dizziness. During a review of Resident 383's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 11/29/2023, indicated a score of 75. A score above 45 on the Fall Risk Assessment indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure all food items stored in the kitchen refrigerators were labeled and dated and failed to remove expired foods from the refrigerator. These deficient practices could expose residents to harmful bacteria growth, leading to foodborne illness for 83 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During an initial tour and observation of the kitchen on 12/19/2023 at 8:30 a.m., the following were in the kitchen refrigerator: nine cups of unlabeled applesauce in a tray, two unlabeled cabbages, three unlabeled green papers, and parsley in a wet plastic bag labeled 11/12/2023. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/19/2023 at 9:00 a.m., the dietary supervisor (DS) 1 stated the parsley looked old and needed to be discarded from the refrigerator. DS 1 could not identify the preparation date of the nine applesauce cups, the delivery date, or the best-buy date of the cabbages and green peppers. During an interview on 12/21/2023 at 2:23 p.m., DS 1 stated that everyone, including her,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene while administrating medication for one of eight sampled resident (Resident 27) and ensure for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 218) 's indwelling catheter (also known as Foley catheter, a tube that allows urine to drain from the bladder into a bag that is usually attached to the thigh) drainage bag was not touching the floor and Resident 218's oxygen nasal cannula tubing (a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen placed directly on a resident's nostrils) was not on the floor, improperly stored, and undated. These deficient practices placed Resident 27 and 218 at risk for contracting infections. Findings: a.During a review of Resident 27's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of partial or total body function on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (one-sided weakness without complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dignity to one of eight sampled residents (Resident 218), when Resident 218 urine collection bag was not covered with a dignity or privacy bag and the bag visible to other residents and visitors. This failure resulted in Resident 218's rights to dignity and privacy being violated. Findings: During a review of Resident 218's admission Record (Face Sheet ), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 218 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses dysphagia, hypertension, diabetes, muscle weakness, and UTI. A review of Resident 218's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a comprehensive standardized assessment and care-screening tool) dated 11/24/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 218 was alert, and oriented to person, place, totally dependent on staff for dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, and bathing. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/29/2023 at 11:26 a.m., in Resident 218's room with CNA 2, observed Resident 218's urine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation to meet the residents needs when the residents' call light was out of reach for three of eight sampled residents (Resident 41, 218, and 46). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the psychosocial well-being of the residents or result in delayed provision of care or services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 41's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 41 as admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), muscle weakness (a lack of strength in the muscles), and dysphagia (swallowing difficulties). During a review of Resident 41's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a comprehensive standardized assessment and care-screening tool) dated 10/20/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 41 was totally dependent on staff for dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene, and bathing. During a review of Resident 41's Care Plan ([CP] a form where…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR resident screening prior to admission, to determine if the person has, or is suspected of having, a mental illness) screening was completed for Resident 64. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 64 had the potential for not receiving the necessary and appropriate behavioral treatment and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 64's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia (serious mental illness that affect how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), and Parkinson's disease (a movement disorder). During a review of Resident 64's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 9/19/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 64 's cognitive (mental process by which knowledge is acquired, including perception, intuition, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to create and update a patient focused care plan to address fluid restrictions and significant weight gain for one of six sampled residents (Resident 68). This deficit practice resulted in Resident 68 inaccurately being monitored for a fluid restriction of 1.5 liters (L, a unit of measurement of volume) and placed Resident 68 at risk for increased weight gain and fluid overload (too much fluid in the body). Findings: During a review of Resident 68's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hyponatremia (low sodium level in the blood), Type II Diabetes Mellitus (DM: condition that happens due to the way the body regulates sugar) diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage caused by diabetes), hyperlipidemia (high level of cholesterol and fat in the blood), acute kidney failure (sudden episode of kidney failure or kidney damage that causes the kidneys to keep the right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 18 residents (Resident 62) was not left in a wet diaper which resulted in moisture associated skin damage ([MASD] skin damage from exposure to moisture for long periods of time). This failure resulted in Resident 62 developing MASD to his peri-anal (the skin around the anus), and groin area. Findings: During a review of Resident 62's admission Record, dated 8/1/2023, the admission record indicated Resident 62 was admitted to the facility 8/1/2023 with diagnoses not limited to diabetes mellitus (a disorder in which the body does not produce enough or respond normally to insulin (lowers the levels of blood sugar [glucose] in the blood) and cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and blood vessels in the brain). During a review of Resident 62's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 8/14/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 62's cognitive skills for daily decision making was severely impaired. The MDS indicated there was no MASD anywhere on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement and follow the physician's order for fluid restrictions for one out of six sampled residents (Resident 68). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 68 to experience worsening hyponatremia (low salt in the body) and develop fluid overload (too much fluid in the body). Findings: During a review of Resident 68's admission record, the admission record indicated Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hyponatremia, acute kidney failure (sudden episode of kidney failure or kidney damage that causes the kidneys to keep the right balance of fluid in the body), and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 68's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 12/7/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 68's cognitive (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) skills…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly assess and manage pain for one of six sampled residents (Resident 75). The deficient practice resulted in Resident 75 experiencing uncontrolled pain. Findings: During a review of Resident 75's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 75 was initially admitted to the facility 10/25/2023 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis (infection in the bloodstream) and peripheral autonomic neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage) and colitis (swelling and inflammation of the large intestine [colon]). During a review of Resident 75's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 11/23/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 75's cognitive (the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses) skills were intact. The MDS indicated Resident 75 occasionally experienced pain that affected sleep and and limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the medication room temperature was consistently monitored and recorded in a Room Temperature Log to ensure a safe temperature range for medication storage. This deficient practice had the potential to harm residents due to the potential loss of strength and effectiveness of the medications. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/21/2023 at 1:37p.m. with Registered Nurse Supervisor 1 (RNS 1), the Temperature Record Report indicated the temperature was not documented on 11/31/2023 during the afternoon and night shift and on 12/20/2023 during the afternoon shift. The Temperature Record Report indicated to check the temperature daily. RNS 1 stated the licensed nurses are in charge of checking and logging the medication room temperature. RNS 1 stated that there are medications that need to be stored at certain temperatures, and if the temperatures are not checked, it can potentially degrade the effectiveness of the medication. During a review of the facility's policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three resident's (Resident 62) family representative understood the arbitration agreement (a document that settles any disputes between two parties through binding arbitration, a dispute resolution mechanism that is out of the court system. This failure resulted in a resident (Resident 62) entering into an agreement for binding arbitration (the process of resolving a dispute outside of the court system by using a neutral third party), without fully understanding what they were signing. Findings: During a review of Resident 62's admission Record, dated 8/1/2023, the admission record indicated Resident 62 was admitted to the facility 8/1/2023 with diagnoses not limited to diabetes mellitus (a disorder in which the body does not produce enough or respond normally to insulin (lowers the levels of blood sugar [glucose] in the blood) and cerebrovascular disease (a group of conditions that affect blood flow and blood vessels in the brain). During a review of Resident 62's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who tested positive for COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease -a contagious respiratory infectious illness) on 11/2/2023 and had a change of condition (COC) of shortness of breath and lethargy (condition of deep and lasting drowsiness from which the person can be aroused only with difficulty and temporarily) on 11/6/2023, was provided care. The facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 1 was assessed, monitored, and had vital signs (VS- measurements of the body's most basic functions temperature, pulse rate, respiration rate [rate of breathing] and blood pressure)including oxygen saturation ([O2 sat] blood oxygen level) checked every shift as ordered by the physician. 2. Ensure Resident 1 ' s physician was informed of the continuous shortness of breath after Resident 1 was seen by the medical doctor (MD) on 11/7/2023. 3. Ensure staff followed the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Change of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1), the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 1 was treated with respect when two Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA), CNA 3 and CNA 4, was speaking hostile (aggressive) and rudely (impolite, insulting) at Resident 1 and did not provide Resident 1 the opportunity to express herself in a language (spanish) she can fluently speak. 2. Ensure Resident 1, who speaks spanish, was offered, and provided translation services or a spanish-speaking staff to assist Resident 1 in making herself understood and her needs known. These failures resulted in Resident 1 feeling ignored and disrespected and had the potential to affect Resident 1's safety and health condition when health concerns were not heard and understood and can potentially cause poor-quality and delay of care and services necessary to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the resident (Resident 1). Findings: During observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$139,865 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $57,269 — penalty dated 2024-04-22
  • $82,596 — penalty dated 2024-02-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.2M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 11%Medicare 7%Other / private 82%

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$396per resident / day
operating cost
$12,041per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$363per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055041. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next