Alvarado Care Center
1154 S.alvarado St, Los Angeles, CA 90006 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 72 certified beds · (213) 385-1715 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $90,600 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-22)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.9% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 40.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 10.6% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.5% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.98 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.01 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
34.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 157 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 67.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 34.3%CMS range 25.7–41.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 9.1–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 67.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 77.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 63.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 92.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 65.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.1%CMS range 3.6–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.43 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 69.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
63 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited beforedisputed · IIDR2025-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of pressure injuries and provided care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Implement interventions to prevent PI (Pressure Injury - localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) development for Resident 1 who was admitted without PI, by not repositioning according to the Care Plan (CP- a document that details an individual's health conditions, treatments, needs, and goals, serving as a blueprint for their healthcare and support services) for quadriplegia dated 6/27/25. No documentation repositioning was done. Resident bedbound.2. Provide pressure-relieving mattresses as indicated in the CP for quadriplegia dated 6/27/25.3. Accurately assess Resident 1 Risk for skin breakdown. Skin assessment done on 6/30/25 indicated friction and shear no apparent problem and the assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a significant change in condition was appropriately assessed, reported, documented, and incorporated into the comprehensive care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure resulted in lack of direction for staff to address Resident 1's left knee pain and swelling, and had the potential to result in delayed or inadequate care.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy (a reversible decline in brain function occurring in people with severe liver disease, such as cirrhosis or liver failure), cirrhosis of liver (a type of liver damage where healthy cells are replaced by scar tissue), reduced mobility, cellulitis of left leg (an infection of the deeper layers of skin and underlying tissue. This infection and spread quickly and become life threatening), thrombocytopenia (occurs when your bone marrow doesn't make enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an updated, person-centered care plan following a significant change in condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure resulted in lack of clear interventions and monitoring to address Resident 1's left knee pain and swelling, impaired mobility, or risk for further injury, and had the potential to result in delayed or inadequate care.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of hepatic encephalopathy (a reversible decline in brain function occurring in people with severe liver disease, such as cirrhosis or liver failure), cirrhosis of liver (a type of liver damage where healthy cells are replaced by scar tissue), reduced mobility, cellulitis of left leg (an infection of the deeper layers of skin and underlying tissue. This infection and spread quickly and become life threatening), thrombocytopenia (occurs when your bone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that call light systems were functioning properly and that staff consistently verified functionality to promote timely response to resident needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2).This failure resulted in inconsistent implementation of monitoring practices, resulting in a non-functioning call light for Resident 2, and had the potential to result in delayed care and unmet resident needs.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (DM2- A condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as fuel), hypoglycemia (a condition characterized by blood sugar levels falling below normal. Common in people with diabetes, often due to excess insulin, inadequate food intake, or intense exercise. Symptoms include shakiness, dizziness, sweating, and confusion. Severe cases can lead to seizures or loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:-Ensure Risperdal (a medication used to treat mental illness) was used to treat a medical diagnosis clearly documented in the medical record for one of five residents (Resident 1) sampled for unnecessary medications-Define specific problematic behaviors related to the use of Risperdal and Depakote (a medication used to treat mental illness) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 69) for unnecessary medications (Resident 69).-Monitor for adverse effects (unwanted or dangerous medication-related side effects) related to the use of Cymbalta (a medication used to treat mental illness) in one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident 69.)The deficient practices of failing to define specific problematic behaviors, ensure medication was used to treat a resident's specific, diagnosed condition, and monitor adverse effects related to the use of psychotropic medications (medications that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) increased the risk that Residents 1 and 69 could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive resident assessment tool) assessment Section I (active diagnoses) by failing to include diagnoses of bipolar disorder (a mental illness characterized by having rapid changes in mood from depression to mania) and depression (a mental illness characterized by depressed mood, insomnia, and lack of energy or interest in usually enjoyable activities) per information in the medical record for two of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications (Resident 1 and Resident 69).The deficient practice of failing to accurately assess active diagnoses and complete MDS Section I increased the risk that Resident 1 and Resident 69 may not have received care planning and treatment according to their needs possibly leading to a decline in their overall health and well-being. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (a record containing diagnostic and demographic resident information),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized person-centered care plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care and services facility staff need to provide a resident to promote healing and prevent a worsening of a condition, and current treatments) to meet the resident's needs for two of sixteen sampled residents (Resident 54, and Resident 69), by failing to: 1. Create and implement an at risk for falls care plan for Resident 54 on 11/11/25 after the resident suffered a fall.2. Create and implement a care plan for Resident 69 requiring supervision or touch assistance with meals.3. Create and implement a care plan for Resident 69's specific behaviors defined as aggressive or disruptive related to the use of Depakote (a prescription medication used as a mood stabilizer) and Risperdal (a prescription antipsychotic medication used to treat serious mental health conditions). These failures had the potential for Resident 9, Resident 54,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plans for three of 10 sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 5, Resident 8) by failing to: -Ensure to revise(update) Resident 2's care plan for impaired cognition (having difficulties with thinking, learning, remembering, concentrating, solving problems, or making decisions) related to dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). -Ensure to revise Resident 5's care plan for falls. -Ensure to revise Resident 8's care plan for smoking. These failures had the potential to impact Resident 2's provision of care and services and placed Resident 5 and Resident 8 at risk for injuries related to falls and smoking. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted Resident 2 on 1/29/2025 with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 2' Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety for two five sampled residents (Resident 8 and Resident 56) by failing to:-Ensure to implement safety smoking precautions for Resident 8. -Ensure to complete a post fall neurological assessment for the fall on 9/2025 and 12/2025 and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- group of healthcare staff from different disciplines involved in the care of the resident), met, reviewed, and/or revised Resident 56's care plans after the fall on 09/10/2025 and 12/24/2025 to implement fall precautions for Resident 56. These failures had the potential for Resident 8 to have injuries related to unsafe smoking practices and for Resident 56 to sustain an injury from preventable fall.Findings: a. During a review of Resident 8's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 8 on 5/19/2025 and readmitted Resident 8 on 12/26/2025 with diagnoses that included hereditary idiopathic neuropathy (a group of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer five doses of Adderall (a medication used to treat mental illness) per the physician's order between 1/19/2026 and 1/21/2026 in one resident randomly sampled for medication errors (Resident 34). The deficient practice of failing to administer five doses of Resident 34's Adderall increased the risk that Resident 34 could have experienced medical complications from missing scheduled doses of her medication and caused Resident 34 to feel overwhelmed and anxious about the potential impact to her physical and mental health as a result or missing her medication. Findings:During an observation on 1/21/2026 at 11:19 AM of Station 1 Medication Cart, an empty bubble pack (unit dose packaging from the pharmacy containing individual doses of medication) for Resident 34's Adderall was observed in the locked compartment of the medication cart. During a review of Resident 34's Controlled Drug Record (a log for controlled drugs [medications with a high potential for abuse] indicating the time and date each dose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to:1. Remove one expired insulin aspart pen (a medication used to control high blood sugar) affecting Resident 67 from the medication cart in one of two inspected medication carts (Station 1 Medication Cart). 2. Remove two vials of expired injectable lidocaine (a medication used to treat pain) and one vial of expired haloperidol (a medication used to treat mental illness) from the emergency kit (E-kit - a kit containing a limited supply of medication to be used on an emergency basis) in one of one inspected medication rooms (Medication Room). 3. Label one opened Arnuity Ellipta inhaler (a medication used to treat breathing problems) with an open date per the manufacturer's requirements affecting Resident 83 in one of two inspected medication carts (Station 2 Medication Cart). The deficient practices of failing to remove expired medications from the medication carts and E-kits and label open medication according to the manufacturer's requirements, increased the risk that Resident 67 and Resident 83 could have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 52 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the lunch menu was followed on 1/20/2026, when:1. One Dietary aide (DA2) did not communicate the allergies listed on two of three (the gluten free meal ticket [lists resident's food preferences, allergies, and the food items on the menu to be served and portions] and the lactose intolerant meal ticket) meal tickets.2. [NAME] 2 did not prepare the non-breaded plain hamburger patty replacement for the gluten free diets. As a result, the cooks served pureed country fried steak (breaded beef patty) containing gluten on a tray for a resident who was allergic to gluten, and potato gratin (sliced potatoes in creamy sauce) prepared with milk served on a tray for a resident who was lactose intolerant (milk intolerant). This deficient practice had the potential to result in decreased meal satisfaction, decreased caloric intake and residents experiencing symptoms associated with intolerance in two residents who had gluten intolerance and two residents who had lactose intolerance.Findings: A review of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: The minced and moist diet (diet for residents who experience biting, chewing or swallowing limitations. Food is soft and moist; the size of the lumps should be approximately 4 mm in size fits through gaps of fork prongs.) Au gratin potatoes (sliced potatoes in creamy sauce) were served in a form that was in accordance with the international Dysphagia Diet initiative (IDDSI - a framework made up of levels and describes food textures and drink thickness) Level Five (Minced and Moist foods) when breaded beef patties were chopped and not minced and the texture of the minced and moist was not small (minced) did not fit through the gaps of fork prongs and breaded beef patty was dry. This failure had the potential to result in meal dissatisfaction and increased choking risk for ten residents on the minced and moist diet.During an observation in the facility's kitchen on 1/20/2026 at 10:00AM, Cook1 removed a portion of baked breaded beef patties from the oven and placed them on a chopping board. Cook1 started…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and preparation practices in the kitchen when: 1.Clean and sanitized resident trays and cups were stored on the counter next to the handwashing sink and in the splash zone (the area within roughly 3 feet of a handwashing sink or drain, where water spray and particles from handwashing can contaminate surrounding surfaces). 2. The floor in the dry storage area located in the kitchen was not kept clean, food debris, a hair net, a lighter, condiments packages and plastic wrappers were on the floor. 3. Expired food was stored in the dry storage area. One unsealed bag of chocolate chips with no date, one bag of powder/ground graham crackers stored with the bag opened and received date of 8/30/2024 (expired), one container of Worcestershire sauce with a use by date (the final recommended date for safe consumption, indicates when food is at peak quality and should be treated as a safety deadline) of 3/21/2025, and one container of sesame oil with a use by date of 11/20/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain an informed consent (a process during which residents or caregivers are educated regarding the potential risks and benefits of medication therapy) from the resident or their responsible party (a person delegated to make medical decisions for the resident in the event they are unable to do so) prior to the treatment with Cymbalta (a medication used to treat mental illness) in one of five sampled residents (Resident 69) for unnecessary medications.The deficient practice of failing to obtain an informed consent prior to initiating treatment with a psychotropic (medications that affect brain activities associated with mental processed and behavior) medications could have prevented Resident 69 from exercising her right to decline treatment with Cymbalta. This increased the risk that Resident 69 could have experienced adverse effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) related to Cymbalta leading to impairment or decline in her mental or physical condition or functional or psychosocial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide feeding assistance during meals for one of three sampled residents (Resident 69). This deficient practice had the potential not to meet Resident 69's specific needs and had the potential for Resident 69's activities of daily living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves) to decline.Findings:During a review of Resident 69's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 69 on 4/9/2025 with diagnoses that included unqualified visual loss (a significant loss of vision in one or both eyes where the specific cause[blindness category, underlying disease] has not been clearly identified) both eyes, unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance (acting out, agitated, aggressive or mood/personality changes), psychotic disturbance(hallucinations or strong delusions), mood disturbance (disruptive sadness, irritability), and anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federal requirement ensuring people with mental illness, intellectual disabilities, or related conditions are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes) was done for one of five sampled residents (Resident 42) diagnosed with a mental illness prior to admission in the facility. This failure had the potential for Resident 42 not to receive the necessary and appropriate psychiatric evaluation (is a comprehensive mental health assessment by a professional to diagnose emotional, behavioral, or cognitive conditions, guide treatment, and understand a person's overall mental state) and level of treatment at the facility.Findings: During a review of Resident 42's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 42 on 8/18/2025 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD - irreversible kidney failure), essential (primary) hypertension (HTN - high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 79) reviewed for skin care received the care required to prevent pressure ulcer/injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) by failing to: -Ensure to set Resident 79's low air loss mattress (LALM - a medical bed surface designed for immobile patients to prevent or treat bedsores) according to Resident 79's weight. This failure had the potential for Resident 79 to develop pressure injuries and/or worsen skin wounds (injury that break the skin or other body tissues).Findings: During a review of Resident 79's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 79 on 1/22/2019 and readmitted Resident 79 on 1/15/2026 with diagnoses that included cerebral palsy (a lifelong condition that leads to problems with movement, balance, and posture, like a broken communication line between the brain and muscles), type 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI-an infection in any part of your urinary system, your kidneys, ureters, bladder and urethra) for one of two sampled resident (Resident 9) by failing to:1. Provide an on-going assessment of the use and removal of Resident 9's indwelling foley catheter (foley catheter - a hollow tube left implanted in a body canal or organ, especially the bladder, to promote drainage).2. Review and revise the individualized care plan when Resident 9 had UTI on 3/24/2025 and 09/15/2025.3. Initiate an interdisciplinary team (IDT) review when Resident 9 had UTI on 3/24/2025 and 09/15/2025 and a change of condition on 11/30/2025.These deficient practices has caused Resident 9 to develop catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI - an infection of the urinary tract caused by a tube [urinary catheter] that has been placed to drain urine from the bladder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the necessary medication (Biktarvy) used to treat Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV- is a virus that attacks the body's immune system. HIV damages the immune system so that the body is less able to fight infection and disease. Without treatment, it can lead to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome- a chronic condition of the disease) was available and administered as ordered by the physician on six consecutive days for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2).This failure resulted in an interruption and delay of treatment for Resident 2, causing emotional and psychological distress for Resident 2, and placed Resident 2 at risk of avoidable decline in health status.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of HIV.During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized resident assessment and care screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary medication (Biktarvy) to treat Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV- a virus that attacks the body's immune system. HIV damages the immune system so that the body is less able to fight infection and disease. Without treatment, it can lead to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome- a chronic condition of the disease) was available and administered as ordered by physician for six consecutive days for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2).This failure resulted in an interruption and delay of treatment for Resident 2, causing emotional and psychological distress for Resident 2, and placed Resident 2 at risk of avoidable decline in health status.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of HIV.During a review of Resident 2's Order Summary (part of the resident's medical record that synthesizes all physician orders,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1 who was assessed on 5/29/25 as at risk for fall, the facility failed to develop a plan of care to address the risk of fall for Resident 1. This deficient practice had the potential to cause a delay or lack of necessary care for Resident 1. During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/29/25 with diagnoses including diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), lack of coordination and absence of right leg above knee.During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 6/5/25 indicated Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident 1 was dependent on shower, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, personal hygiene, substantial assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update and revise the care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to update and revise the care plan when Resident 1 had a fall on 8/18/25 and 8/30/25. This deficient practice resulted in the facility failing to develop and implement new interventions for Resident 1 to prevent future falls. Findings:During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/29/25 with diagnoses including diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), lack of coordination and absence of right leg above knee.During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 6/5/25 indicated Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident 1 was dependent on shower, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, personal hygiene, substantial assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, upper body dressing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate nutrition for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to provide interventions when Resident 1 refused to eat on 8/18/25 at 5:30 p.m. and refused to eat all meals on 8/19/25 and 8/23/25. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 not meeting his adequate nutritional status. During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/29/25 with diagnoses including diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), lack of coordination and absence of right leg above knee.During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 6/5/25 indicated Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident 1 was dependent on shower, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, personal hygiene, substantial assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, upper body dressing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete record for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1 the facility failed to ensure:1.The Fall Risk Assessments dated 8/18/25 and 8/30/25 reflected Resident 1's risk of fall, whether Resident 1 was low risk or high risk for fall. 2.The Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] accurately reflected that Resident 1 had a history of falls. These deficient practices resulted in an inaccurate and incomplete record for Resident 1. During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 5/29/25 with diagnoses including diabetes (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), lack of coordination and absence of right leg above knee.During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 6/5/25 indicated Resident 1 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident 1 was dependent on shower, lower body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure their policy for Unusual Occurrence Reporting included major accidents and follow it to report a major accidental fall with injury according to the State and Federal regulations for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice resulted an outdated policy and procedures being implemented when the facility made the decision not to report a major accidental fall with injury to the State Agency (SA). During a review of Resident 1's admission Record dated 7/10/25, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including unsteadiness on feet, lack of coordination, Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), repeated falls, major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the resident's Power of Attorney (POA, allows someone else to manage the personal and financial matters of another person) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to notify Resident 1's POA when Resident 1 had an appointment for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI, medical imaging procedure for making images of the internal structures of the body) on 6/25/25. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 1's POA not given their right to participate in decision making before services were provided.Findings. During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 11/21/24 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), hypertension (high blood pressure) and depression. During a review of the History and Physical dated 2/15/25 indicated Resident 1 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 5/30/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to properly use the low air loss mattress (LAL, specialized mattress that prevents pressure ulcers [damage to an area of the skin caused by constant pressure on the area for a long time], according to the professional standard of practice for one of the two sampled residents (Resident 1). During observation on 6/27/25 at 9:20 a.m., Resident 1 had a blue reusable pad ( chux) while lying on the LAL mattress. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 1's comfort level and delay healing of Resident 1's pressure ulcer. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 11/21/24 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), hypertension (high blood pressure) and depression. During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan initiated on 11/22/24 indicated Resident 1 had saccrococcyx (lower back and tail bone) pressure injury. The Care Plan goal included Resident 1 will have no complications related to the saccrococcyx…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to document medications were administered as soon as given and failed to document the reasons why the medications were not administered.These deficient practices resulted in the facility failing to determine if the medications were administered to Resident 1, prevent the potential for medication errors, medication duplication and delay in care and treatment to meet the needs of Resident 1. Findings:During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 11/21/24 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), hypertension (high blood pressure) and depression. During a review of the History and Physical dated 2/15/25 indicated Resident 1 does not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 5/30/25 indicated Resident 1 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop individualized person-centered care plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care and services facility staff need to provide a resident to promote healing and prevent a worsening of a condition, and current treatments) to meet the residents needs for three of six sampled residents (Resident 25, Resident 28 and Resident 45) as evidenced by: 1. Failing to create a care plan with goals and interventions for Resident 25's pressure ulcers (also known as a pressure injury, a localized area of damaged skin or tissue caused by prolonged pressure on the skin). 2. Failing to develop a care plan with person centered interventions for antidepressant medication use (medication to treat depression [a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest]) for Resident 28. 3. Failing to create a care plan with goals and interventions for Resident 45's refusal of bolus (a way to send formula…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for behaviors and side effects (an effect of a drug or other type of treatment that is in addition to or beyond its desired effect) of antipsychotic medication (medication used to treat certain mental/mood disorders) for two of five sampled residents (Resident 8 and Resident 23) by failing to: 1. Monitor Resident 8 for behaviors and side effects of risperidone (Risperdal, an antipsychotic medication used to treat mental illness). 2. Monitor Resident 23 for side effects and behavioral episodes for the use of risperidone and valproic acid (a medication used to treat seizures [a burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells that caused temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements] and bipolar disorder [a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration]). These deficient practices have the potential to result in increased risk of taking unnecessary medication and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment and safe food storage practices were followed in the kitchen by failing to: 1. Ensure a bag of carrots and a bag of frozen corn was labeled and dated in the freezer. 2. Ensure a plastic bag full of personal clothing and shoes belonging to staff was not stored in the dry food storage area during the initial kitchen visit. 3. Ensure a staff member`s jacket and hat were not hanging on the shelf in the dry food storage area during a follow up visit of the kitchen. These deficient practices had the potential to place the facility residents at risk for foodborne illness (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, and other toxins) and the growth of harmful bacteria and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another). Findings: During an initial kitchen tour on 12/13/2024 at 6:10 PM with [NAME] 1, the surveyor observed a bag of frozen carrots and a bag of frozen corn without a label and date in the freezer. [NAME] 1 stated all food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-15 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store the following food brought in by visitors in accordance with the facility's policy by not labeling items with the resident's name and the date it was brought to the facility: a. Three cartons of Almond Breeze. b. One plastic container of string cheese. c. One plastic bottle of Gatorade. d. One carton of Ensure original. e. One plastic container of clover honey. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the risk of food borne illness (illness caused by food contamination with bacteria, viruses, parasites, or toxins). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/15/24 at 10:23 a.m., with Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1), while in the medication storage room, the designated residents' refrigerator was observed with the following items: three cartons of Almond Breeze, one plastic container of string cheese, one plastic bottle of Gatorade, one carton of Ensure original, and one plastic container of clover honey. These items had no resident's name or date it was brought to the facility. RN 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-15 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's oral status was assessed comprehensively for one of one sampled resident (Resident 40). This deficient practice may result in a failure to meet Resident 40's oral health needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 40's admission Record, the document indicated that the facility admitted Resident 40 on 11/28/2024 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood well), atrial fibrillation (a heart condition that causes an irregular and often abnormally fast heart rate), and anemia (a condition that develops when your blood produces a lower-than-normal amount of healthy blood cells). During a review of Resident 40's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 12/5/2024, the document indicated that the resident had intact cognition (undamaged mental abilities, including remembering things, making decisions,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-15 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 25), who had pressure ulcers (also known as a pressure injury, a localized area of damaged skin or tissue caused by prolonged pressure on the skin), was assessed quarterly using the Braden scale assessment (a tool used to assess a patient's risk of developing pressure ulcers). This deficient practice caused an increased risk in assessing a significant change to Resident 25's skin integrity. Findings: During a review of Resident 25's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/13/2024 with diagnoses that included a displaced communicated fracture of the shaft of the right fibula (an injury where the bone in the lower leg, specifically the middle section (shaft), has broken into multiple pieces causing a visible deformity and likely requiring surgical intervention), difficulty in walking, and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-15 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) was transmitted timely to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system for one of one sampled resident (Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed services for the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 3`s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 4/13/2005, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), type two diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of Resident 3's MDS dated [DATE], The MDS indicated that the resident`s cognitive skills (brain's ability to think, read, learn, remember, reason, express thoughts,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to set the resident's Low Air Loss Mattress (LALM - a pressure-relieving mattress used to prevent and treat pressure injuries) to the correct setting for one of one sampled residents (Resident 23) investigated under the pressure ulcer/injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) care area. This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for discomfort and the development of pressure ulcers/injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Record, the document indicated the facility admitted Resident 23 to the facility on 3/5/2024 and readmitted the resident on 7/5/2024 with diagnoses including idiopathic neuropathy (a nerve condition that affects the body's automatic function), major depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with your daily activities of living), and anxiety (persistent and excessive worry that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled residents (Resident 35) received the necessary care and services to prevent accidents and falls by failing to: 1. Revise Resident 35`s fall care plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) after Resident 35 fell on 7/31/2024 and 10/16/2024. 2. Assess Resident 35 accurately when developing fall risk assessments. These deficient practices placed Resident 35 at an increased risk for recurrent falls. Findings: During a review of Resident 35`s admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 35 on 4/8/2024, and readmitted the resident on 11/11/2024, with diagnoses that included depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), lack of coordination (not able to move different parts of the body together well or easily), reduced (less) mobility, and unsteadiness on feet.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure latanoprost eye drops (a medication that required refrigeration and used to treat glaucoma) were stored in the refrigerator per the manufacturer's requirements for one resident (Resident 10) in one of one inspected medication carts (Medication Cart 1). The deficient practice had the potential to result in an increased risk that Resident 10 could have received medication that had become ineffective or toxic due to improper storage possibly leading to health complications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/15/2024 at 3:03 PM of Medication Cart 1 with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) the following medications were found stored in a manner contrary to the manufacturer's requirements: 1). One unopened bottle of latanoprost eye drops (medication used to treat glaucoma, a condition in which increased pressure in the eye can lead to a gradual loss of vision, and ocular hypertension, a condition which causes increased pressure in the eye) for Resident 10 was found stored at room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure titled, Installation of Eye Drops (putting eye drops into residents' eyes) by failing to ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) washed and dried her hands thoroughly before treating each eye while administering eye drops to one (Resident 24) out of five residents investigated during a review of the infection control task. This deficient practice had the potential to cause cross contamination (unintentional transfer of bacteria/germs or other contaminants from one surface to another) infection (occurs when harmful microorganisms, such as bacteria or viruses enter the body and multiply) between Resident 24's eyes. Findings: During a review of Resident 24's admission Record, the admission Record indicated that the facility initially admitted Resident 24 on 11/26/2024 with diagnoses that included chronic systolic heart failure (a long-term condition in which a heart cannot pump blood well enough to meet the body needs), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM, activity aimed at improving movement of a specific joint) exercises as ordered by the physician for two of three sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3). For Resident 2 and Resident 3, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the restorative nursing assistants (RNA, assist recovering residents to regain physical and cognitive capabilities through mobility and exercises) provided ROM exercises to Resident 2 and Resident 3 daily five times a week as ordered by the physician. Resident 2 and Resident 3 did not receive ROM exercises on 11/5/24, 11/7/24 and 11/12/24. 2. Create care plan that would address the restorative needs of Resident 2 and Resident 3. These deficient practices had the potential for Resident 2 and Resident 3 to develop decreased ROM and contractures (a stiffening/shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion). Findings: 1. During a review of the admission Record for Resident 2, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 7/12/24 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan after a change in condition (CIC - clinically important deviation from a patient ' s baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional domains that, without intervention, may result in complications or death) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). On 8/20/24, Resident 1 alleged that a person came into Resident 1 ' s room and placed a hand over Resident 1 ' s mouth. The facility failed to create a care plan that will address Resident 1 ' s allegations and the interventions and services that would be provided to Resident 1. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility not to meet the needs of Resident 1. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 8/15/24 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease (condition that affect the blood flow in the brain) with hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness in one side of the body) of the right side, diabetes (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary social services for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to provide social services to Resident 1 who made allegation on 8/20/24 that a person went into her room and placed a hand to cover Resident 1 ' s mouth. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 1 ' s psychosocial well-being and ensure that Resident 1 felt safe. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 8/15/24 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease (condition that affect the blood flow in the brain) with hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness in one side of the body) of the right side, diabetes (a condition that happens when the blood sugar [blood glucose] is too high), and anxiety disorder. During a review of the Nurse Progress Notes dated 8/20/24 at 11 p.m. indicated the licensed vocational nurse (LVN) overheard Resident 1 talking on the phone with Resident 1 ' s family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records that were accurate and concise for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). On 8/21/24 at 7 a.m., the Nurses Progress Notes indicated Resident 1 alleged that a staff member physically assaulted Resident 1. The registered nurse supervisor (RNS 1) stated Resident 1 ' s allegation that a staff member physically assaulted Resident 1 was wrong. This deficient practice resulted in the inaccurate medical record for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 8/15/24 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease (condition that affect the blood flow in the brain) with hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness in one side of the body) of the right side, diabetes (a condition that happens when the blood sugar [blood glucose] is too high), and anxiety disorder. During a review of the Nurse Progress Notes dated 8/20/24 at 11 p.m. indicated the licensed vocational nurse (LVN) overheard Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Amended on 4/22/2025 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse (deliberate, aggressive, or violent behavior with the intention to cause harm) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when on 6/26/2024 Resident 2 hit Resident 1 on the nose causing pain and redness to the nose. Resident 1 was subjected to abuse and psychosocial (mental health) harm by Resident 2, while under the care of the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/19/2024 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), psychosis (a mental disorder, collection of symptoms that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality) and anxiety disorder. A review of Resident 2's Behavior Problem Care Plan, initiated 3/7/2024, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to developo a care plan (a document outlining a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's need) for psychotropic (a medication that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) medication for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 2 not receiving the appropriate care and to experience adverse (harmful) side effects which could result in injury. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/18/2024 with diagnoses including unspecified psychosis (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality) schizoaffective disorder (a mental health problem where you experience psychosis as well as mood symptoms), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with your daily activities of living). A review of Resident 2's Physician's Orders dated 7/18/2024, indicated the resident was to receive the following:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent (a communication between a patient and physician that results in the patient's authorization or agreement to undergo a specific medical intervention or treatment) for an increase in the dosage of Fluvoxamine Maleate [a medication used to treat depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with your daily activities of living), with side effects that include nausea, diarrhea, tremors, seizures, fast heartbeat, insomnia (trouble sleeping), and restlessness] for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 1 not being informed about the medications Resident 1 was receiving and had the potential to cause the resident to experience adverse (harmful) side effects of the medication. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/31/2024 with a diagnoses including depression. A review of Resident 1's Physician's Order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) diagnosed with unspecified dementia (loss of cognitive functioning-thinking, remembering, and reasoning) and major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that once brought joy) severe with psychotic symptoms (a collection of symptoms, including delusions [false beliefs, for example, that people on television are sending them special messages or that others are trying to hurt them] and hallucinations [seeing or hearing things that others do not, such as hearing voices telling them to do something or criticizing them] which happen when a person experiences a disconnection from reality) with a court delegated durable power of attorney (POA – authorizes someone else to handle certain matters, such as finances or health care, on someone ' s behalf. If a power of attorney is durable, it remains in effect if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment by failing to ensure residents ' rooms were kept with comfortable sound levels maintained for two of six sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 6). This deficient practice placed Resident 5 and 6 an increased level of discomfort and inability to sleep during the night that had the potential to negatively impact the resident ' s quality of life. Cross Reference F656. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated that Resident 5 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]) and depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and care-screening tool) dated 6/6/2024, MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan (CP) that met the care/services based on the resident's individual assessed needs for three of seven sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 5, and Resident 6) regarding Resident 5 and 6 ' s inability to sleep and complained due to Resident 1 ' s noise at nighttime. This deficient practice had the potential to result negative impact on residents ' health and safety, as well as the quality of care and services received. Cross Reference F584. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated that Resident 5 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]) and depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who was a smoker was assessed for their ability to smoke safely prior to being allowed to smoke independently while in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential for fire related accidents in the facility among residents, staff and visitors. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including nicotine dependence, cigarettes (involves physical and psychological factors that make it difficult to stop using tobacco, even if the person wants to quit), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), unspecified dementia (loss of cognitive functioning-thinking, remembering, and reasoning), major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have the call light (a mechanism used by residents to promptly communicate with staff) within reach for two of five sampled residents (Resident 2 and 3). This deficient practice had the potential to result in an accident and/or injury. Findings: A review Resident 2's admission Record dated 4/26/24 indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including hypertension (high blood pressure), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) of the right dominant side, dementia (decline in abilities to remember, make judgments, think, or make decisions), atherosclerotic heart disease (damage or disease of the heart's large vessels). A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 2/4/24 indicated Resident 2 had severe cognitive (ability to think, understand and make daily decisions) impairment and was dependent on staff for eating, oral hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had specific choices and treatments communicated through an Advance Directives and copies of the Advance Directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) were maintained in the Resident's clinical record for four of forty-three Residents (Resident 2 , 28, 38 and 56). This deficient practice had the potential to cause conflict with a resident's wishes regarding health care for Residents (2, 28, 38 and 56). Findings: a. A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated Resident 2 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety (a mental disorder in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure therapeutic diets were served as prescribed by the physician for three of ten sampled residents (Residents 23, 25, and 41). These deficient practices had the potential to result in the risk for decreased nutritional intake and weight loss. Findings: a. A review of Resident 23's admission record indicated the facility readmitted the resident on 10/6/2022, with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia (short-term memory loss, confusion, personality, and behavior changes) and Type II diabetes mellitus (high levels of sugar in the blood). A review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 8/9/2023, indicated Resident 23 had severely impaired cognition (never/rarely made decisions) and required supervision when eating, with extensive assistance for dressing, personal hygiene, and toilet use. The MDS indicated Resident 23 did not have a swallowing disorder and did not have any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and sanitary environment, including food storage practices in the kitchen, as evidenced by: -Observation of visible dirt and stains on the dish washing machine. -Failing to label and date an open bag of grapes and cilantro in the refrigerator and a bag of shredded cheese inside the freezer. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness or infection. Findings: During the initial tour and observation of the kitchen on 1/23/2023 at 7:50 AM, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), there was dirt which appeared to be wood dust on top of the dish washing machine. There were stains on the front and sides of the dish washing machine. During a concurrent interview, the DS stated, The dish washing machine is dirty. Staff normally perform the cleaning of the dish washer every afternoon. They must have missed cleaning it yesterday. The DS stated the potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its Informed Consent, policy and procedure (a process by which residents or their responsible parties have the choice to accept or decline certain medication therapy or treatments once they are educated about the risks and benefits) for two of five sampled residents (Resident 22 and 25) by failing to: -Ensure the facility obtained Resident 22's signature for declination of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019 is an infectious disease caused by virus that can result in different symptoms from mild to severe respiratory illnesses and is spread during close contact and through the air from person to person) vaccination. -Ensure the facility informed and obtained the Responsible Party's (RP) signature prior to administering the influenza (a high contagious viral infection of the respiratory passages) and COVID-19 vaccinations. These deficient practices violated Resident 22's right to make an informed decision regarding the COVID-19 vaccination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform a Medicare and/or Medicaid eligible resident of changes made to services covered by Medicare and/or Medicaid prior to the last covered day for one of three sampled residents (Residents 50). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 50 not being provided the information needed to decide to continue or refuse receiving the specific skilled services and have those options honored. Findings: A review of Resident 50's admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 50 on 9/27/2023 with diagnoses including schizophrenia (chronic and severe mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), bipolar disorder (extreme mood swings that include mania [emotional highs] and depression which may lead to impaired functioning), and unsteadiness on feet. A review of Resident 50's recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/2/2023 indicated Resident 50 was cognitively intact (decisions consistent and reasonable) and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized person-centered care plan to meet the residents' need for two of five sampled residents (Resident 30 and 38). For Resident 30 the facility failed to develop a care plan with goals and interventions for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system). -For Resident 38, the facility failed to develop a care plan with goals and interventions when the resident refused to receive the influenza (a high contagious viral infection of the respiratory passages), and COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019 is an infectious disease caused by virus that can result in different symptoms from mild to severe respiratory illnesses and is spread during close contact and through the air from person to person) vaccinations. These deficient practices had the potential to result in and lead to inadequate care of Residents 30 and 38. Findings: a. A review of Resident 30's admission record indicated Resident 30 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities by not providing both hearing aids for one of one sampled resident (Resident 18). This deficient practice had the potential to result in resident's needs not being provided and not being able to hear adequately during a conversation. Findings: A review of Resident 18's admission record indicated the facility re-admitted Resident 18 on 5/24/2021 with diagnoses that included hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), glaucoma (a condition of increased pressure within the eyeball causing gradual loss of sight), and hearing loss to the left ear. A review of Resident 18's hearing assessment, dated 5/4/2023, indicated the resident had hearing loss significant enough to quality for hearing aids (HA- a device designed to improve hearing by making sound audible to a person with hearing loss). Resident 18 had greater hearing loss at higher frequencies in the left ear, meaning the resident had greater difficulty discriminating between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to change the oxygen tubing for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 38). This failure had the potential to result in a respiratory tract infection (an infection that affects the part of your body responsible for breathing) for Resident 38. Findings: During an observation on 1/23/2024 at 11:23 AM in Resident 38's room, there was an oxygen tube connected to the oxygen machine and to Resident 38 without a date. There was also an open equipment bag dated 1/7/2024. A review of Resident 38's admission record indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility 12/20/2023 with diagnoses including acute on chronic combined systolic (congestive), diastolic congestive heart failure (CHF- disease that causes the heart muscle to lose the ability to pump blood efficiently, and back pressure in the veins forces fluid to seep out and settle in the lungs and other tissues), and pneumonia (the air sacs may fill with fluid or pus). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 55) who was receiving hemodialysis (HD-a medical procedure to remove fluid and waste products from the body) had an emergency kit (supplies can be used to stop bleeding during emergency) at his bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident to receive delayed interventions during accidental bleeding. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 55 on 10/18/2023, with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD, when kidneys are no longer able to work as they should to meet the needs of the body), dependence on renal dialysis (process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body), and epilepsy (brain disorder that causes people to have recurring involuntary muscle movements, sensory disturbances and altered consciousness). A review of Resident 55's Physician's Orders, dated 12/23/2023, indicated Resident 55 required hemodialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 4:15 AM. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post daily the Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD - refers to the actual hours of work performed per patient day by a direct caregiver) actual hours worked by licensed staff providing direct care to the residents per shift. As a result, residents and visitors did not know the accurate number of hours of staff working. Findings: During an observation on 1/23/2024 at 8:30 AM, the facility's posting of their DHPPD was observed. The facility did not have the DHPPD posted to indicate the actual direct care service hours for 1/22/2023 and / or 1/23/2023. During an observation on 1/24/2023 at 10:45 AM, the facility's posting of their DHPPD was observed. The facility did not have DHPPD posted to indicate the actual direct care service hours for 1/23/2024 and / or 1/24/2024. During an interview on 1/25/2024 at 10:14 AM, with Payroll (PR), the PR staff stated she was responsible for calculating and completing the DHPPD hours form. The PR staff stated she did not post the actual DHPPD hours for 1/23/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 45) was free of an unnecessary psychotropic (acting on the mind) medication. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 45 receiving Quetiapine (generic name Seroquel, a medication to treat mental and mood disorders) without a clinical indication or reason for use. Findings: A review of Resident 45's admission record indicated Resident 45 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to schizophrenia unspecified (a mental disorder in which a person is disconnected from reality), epilepsy unspecified, intractable with status epilepticus (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures that are controlled) and essential hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure with no known cause). A review of Resident 45's Psychiatric consult notes from MD 2 dated 8/30/2023 indicated Resident 45 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$90,600 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $49,200 — penalty dated 2025-08-22
- $41,400 — penalty dated 2024-06-26
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-23 for 2 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAYER, AARON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/26/2020 |
| MAYER, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/26/2020 |
| THE COMPLIANCE INSTITUTE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/03/2023 |
| GEDYON, LOZA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/06/2022 |
| KERENDI, FAROUGH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/09/1999 |
| 1154 S. ALVARADO, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/06/2019 |
| MAYER PP ASSOCIATES, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/06/2019 |
| PACIFICARE HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/08/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056157. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.