Ararat Convalescent Hospital

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

26.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 36.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.93 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.23 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 27% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an observation, interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from the use of physical restraints (a manual method or device that limits a person's ability to move freely), in accordance with the facility ' s policy and procedure titled Restraints by failing to: 1. Identify a situation that constitutes abuse when Certified Nurse Assistant [CNA] 1 had knowledge that Resident 1 was tied to the wheelchair with a white sheet, on 11/9/24, during the 3 PM to 11 PM shift, as evidenced by a videoclip . CNA 1 did not untie (remove) the white sheet from Resident 1 and did not report the observation to the licensed vocational nurse (LVN 1) immediately. 2. Protect Resident 1 from potential harm that could result in an injury by not responding immediately to protect Resident 1 when CNA 1 witnessed Resident 1 tied up with a white sheet to the wheelchair on 11/9/24. Instead, CNA 1 recorded a video of Resident 1 while tied up with a white sheet to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, and investigate a potential fall for Resident 1 after the resident reported pain and stated she had fallen on 3/2/2026.Nursing staff did not initiate the facility's fall policy, including completing a post fall assessment, neurological monitoring, incident reporting, reassessment of mobility status. This failure resulted in delayed identification of injuries and placed the resident at risk for further harm, unmanaged pain, and unmet care needs.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the resident was noted to have been admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including multiple right sided rib fractures, pneumonia, and dementia. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical dated 12/31/2025, the documentation indicated the resident had fluctuating capacity to understand information and make decisions. During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], the assessment indicated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview and record review the facility failed to implement the policy and procedure on food storage, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to label a used by date for the following food items: -ground meat in a plastic container -three pieces of Armenian pizza -five croissants in a clear plastic bag -five glasses of milk This deficient practice had the potential to result in food contamination, growth of microorganisms (disease causing organism) that could cause foodborne illness (food poisoning or food illness due to pathogens (harmful organism that cause illness such as bacteria, viruses, or parasites) and toxins that contaminate food and negatively affect the health of the residents who consumed it. Findings: During an initial kitchen tour and interview with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 9/30/2025 at 9:05 AM the following were observed without a label with a used by date. In the freezer: -In the freezer ground meat in a plastic container. -three pieces of Armenian pizza. -five croissants in a clear plastic bag. In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policies and procedures (P&P) titled Resident Rights, dated 5/1/2023, by failing to promote privacy and dignity for two of three sampled Residents (Resident 12 and 21) by: 1.Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 1 and 2) standing over Resident 1 while assisting with feeding Resident 21. 2.CNA 4 did not draw the privacy curtain (a curtain that tracks around the resident's bed to create a private space) fully around Resident 12's bed grooming and shaving Resident 12. These deficient practices violated Resident 21 and Resident 12's resident rights to maintain and enhance their self-esteem and self-worth and the right to be treated with dignity and respect. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 21's, admission Record (AR), dated 10/16/2025, indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning — thinking, remembering, and reasoning), heart…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedures (P&P) titled Informed Consent (a voluntary agreement to accept treatment and/or procedures after receiving education regarding the risks, benefits, and alternatives offered) for one of five sample residents (Resident 23) by not ensuring an Informed Consent was complete prior to administration of treatment of Mirtazapine (antidepressant, medication to treat depression). This deficient practice violated Resident 23 rights and her Representative Party (RP) to be informed of the risks and benefits of the proposed treatment and offered alternative treatments for Resident 23's antidepressant treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 23's admission Records (AR), the facility admitted Resident 23 on 9/2/2024 with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and unspecified mood [affective] disorder (mental health conditions that primary affect a resident's mood or emotional state). During a review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan to address the resident's medical and physical needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 9), who's cognitive skills were severely impaired, and was a high risk for fall, by not ensuring Resident 9's bed alarm (used to alert caregivers and staff when a person at risk of falls is getting out of bed) was properly working. This deficient practice had the potential to not alert the staff when Resident 9 attempted to get out of bed which could lead to a fall incident and/or injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia (a decline in mental abilities that makes daily life difficult, affecting memory, thinking, and behavior), muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility and need for assistance with personal care.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility provided necessary care and services to one of one sampled resident (Resident 22) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Care of Catheter. Resident 22's indwelling catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) tubing was coiled and kinked obstructing the urine flow to the drainage bag. This failure had the potential for the urine to backflow to the bladder and bladder distention ( due to over accumulation of urine in the bladder) and result in catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI- an infection of the urinary system that occurs when bacteria enter through a indwelling catheter) and bladder collapse affecting the health and safety of Resident 22. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/5/2025, with the diagnoses including but not limited to bladder cancer, liver cancer, bile duct cancer, prostate cancer, dementia (a progressive state…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent an unplanned weight loss of 15.09% in six months for one of one sampled resident (Resident 7). The facility failed to: 1.Ensure staff identified Resident 7's decrease in oral intake (amount of food and water consumed), reassess and monitor interventions for weight loss when Resident 7 had a weight loss of 16 pounds in six months. 2. Ensure staff provided Resident 7 with a nutritional supplement twice a day as per physician's order from 8/6/2025 - 10/3/2025. These failures resulted in Resident 7's severe weight loss of 6 pounds (lbs.-unit of weight) in three months and placed Resident 7 at risk for malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition, caused by not eating enough), and dehydration (dangerous loss of body fluid). Findings: During review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 6/25/2025, with the diagnoses including but not limited to failure to thrive (a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments which can cause weight…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that three (3) Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) demonstrated sufficient competency and skills to accurately document the food intake of one of four sample residents (Resident 7) by evaluating their how the CNAs documented meal intakes of the residents in accordance to the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Documentation - Nursing, dated 1/1/2016 and the Guidelines for Percentage of Meal Intake. This deficient practice resulted in the inaccurate meal percentage documentation for Resident 7 and may result in the resident not receiving interventions for weight loss. Cross Reference F692 Findings: During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR), the facility admitted Resident 7 on 6/25/2025 with diagnoses that included protein-calorie malnutrition, Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), and adult failure to thrive (a decline caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments which can use weight loss, decreased appetite, poor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately documentation for one of three residents (Resident 36)'s urine characteristics were in the Medical Administration Record (MAR) for October 2025 in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Documentation - Nursing, dated 01/01/2016. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inaccurate documentation in Resident 36's urine characteristics which may lead to a missed change of condition in Resident 36. Findings: During a review of Resident 36's admission Record (AR), the facility admitted Resident 36 on 2/4/2022 and readmitted Resident 36 on 6/1/2025 with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (AF, irregular and rapid heartbeat) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate gland) with lower urinary tract symptoms. During a review of Resident 36's Order Summary, dated 6/10/2025, the order indicated Resident 36 received Eliquis (blood thinner) tablet 5 milligrams (mg, unit of mass) 1 tablet by mouth for chronic atrial fibrillation. During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure (P&P) titled 'Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 12/1/2021 for three of three sampled residents (Resident 13, 23, and 35) by failing to ensure: 1.Ensure Resident 13's nasal cannula (NS, a flexible tube with two prongs that rest in the nostril to develop supplement oxygen) was changed weekly and did not have a label or a date the last time it was changed. 2.Ensure the Housekeeper 1 performed adequate hand hygiene when going in and out of Resident 23 room while performing environmental cleaning and when bringing dirty laundry to the laundry room. 3.Ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) 1 performed adequate hand hygiene when entering and exiting Resident 35's room. These deficient practices had the potential to result in Resident 13's NC to harbor pathogens (bacteria and viruses that causes disease) and spread diseases that could result in infections to the residents, visitors and staffs and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,039 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,039 — penalty dated 2024-11-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA