Culver West Health Center
4035 Grandview Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90066 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 91 certified beds · (310) 390-9506 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (60) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $117,037 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-15)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 21.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.5% | 1.6% | 3.3% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 0.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.5% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.98 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.00 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 232 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 99 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.0%CMS range 41.4–55.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.8–13.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 6.2–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.31 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 77.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
60 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards to maintain skin integrity for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1. Implement the Comprehensive Care Plan for diabetic ulcer (a slow-healing wound that commonly appears on the feet) interventions on monitoring Resident 1 ' s blood sugar to help with wound healing. 2. Ensure that a recommendation of a vascular consult (a doctor who specializes in the treatment of arteries and veins) by the Wound Care Specialist/Nurse Practitioner (WCS) was followed up with the physician to obtain an order after Resident 1 ' s left heel wound size changed from 8/8/2023 with a measurement of 4.2 centimeters (cm, unit of measurement) length by 4.7 cm width and increased size of 4.4 cm length by 5 cm width on 8/15/2023. 3. Conduct an Interdisciplinary (IDT - team members from different disciplines working collaboratively, with a common purpose, to set goals, make decisions and share…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the certified nursing assistant (CNA) 3 failed to put on personal protective equipment (PPE - clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) before entering a room identified with signage as enhanced barrier precautions() to transfer Resident 3 from bed to chair for one of three sampled residents, Resident 3.This deficient practice placed other residents at risk of transmission of possible bacteria.A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated the facility admitted this [AGE] year-old male on 12/17/2025 most recently with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF-a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), Hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), glaucoma, atrial fibrillation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the call light was accessible for one of three sampled residents, (Resident 1).This deficient practice caused Resident 1 to sit in wet diaper from 12:30 am to 6:30 am and further cause burning sensation to buttocks.A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted this [AGE] year old male on 6/14/2025 and most recently on 9/21/2025 with diagnoses including Hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (total weakness of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) of the right side, end stage renal disease(ESRD-End Stage Renal Disease-irreversible kidney failure), dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed), essential hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (fat in the blood), cerebral infarction(CI-stroke, loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) failed to notify supervision of request for room change for one of four sampled residents, (Resident 2).This deficient practice left Resident 2 in a room across from Resident 4 while Resident 4 constantly yells and screams making it difficult for Resident 2 to sleep.A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated the facility admitted this [AGE] year-old male on 11/18/2025 with diagnoses including gastroenteritis and colitis (infection in the colon), ulcerative chronic proctitis (long term inflammation of rectum), pleural effusion (fluid in the space between the lungs and chest wall), atherosclerosis (hardening of arteries), angina (chest pain), left ventricular heart failure (left side of heart does not pump properly), atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), prosthetic heart valve, Anemia (a condition where the body does not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document call system inspection monthly per the facility policy.This deficient practice placed the facility at risk for non-functioning call system.On 12/29/2025 The California Department of Public Health (CDPH) received a complaint alleging the call light was not working for 4 weeks.A review of the maintenance log for July, August and September 2025 indicated all the call lights were working.During an interview on 1/8/2025 at 2:00pm with the Maintenance Manager (MM). The MM stated the call lights and call system are checked monthly and should be documented. The MM stated there was no documentation for the months of November and December 2025.A review of the facility's policy and procedures titled, Building Systems Nurse's Call System reviewed 1/2025, the P&P indicated: Nurse's Call System Testing Procedure 1. Check weekly. A proportionate number of nurses call buttons. buzzers. cords. and lights so that each part of the system is checked at least monthly. Press the call button. Check to see that signal lights up over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review for one of three sampled residents, Resident 1. The registered nurse (RN) 1 failed to review the new dialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed) transportation method prior to picking up Resident 2 for dialysis on 5/10/2025. This deficient practice caused Resident 1 to miss scheduled dialysis treatment on 5/10/2025 and be sent to the general acute care hospital (GACH) where Resident 1 did not receive dialysis because Resident 1 received it the day before at the GACH. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated the facility originally admitted this [AGE] year old female on 6/11/2021 and most recently on 5/9/2025 with diagnoses including, osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone or bone marrow, usually due to infection) of left shoulder, end stage renal disease (End Stage Renal Disease-irreversible kidney failure), non ST elevation (STEMI) myocardial infarction (heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff consulted with a physician, the Interdisciplinary team (IDT - a group of professionals from different specialties working together to provide care) or the faciity Bioethics committee (a group of individuals, often including doctors, nurses, ethicists, and community members, who help navigate complex moral and ethical questions in healthcare and research) regarding vaccinations for one of five sampled residents (Resident 33) who did not have a resident presentative and did not have the mental ability to make decisions. This deficient practice violated Resident 33's right to be supported and represented supported in making decisions regarding vaccinations. Cross reference F883 Findings: During a record review of Resident 33's admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 33 on 3/10/2021 and readmitted Resident 33 on 7/30/2023 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive (a state of decline in older adults characterized by a decline in physical, mental, and social functioning), anemia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT- a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of their clients) failed to ensure one out of four sampled residents (Resident 42) had a physician's order for self-administrations, was assessed determined capable to self-administer medications left at the bedside. This deficient practice had the potential for unintended for and unauthorized access to the medications which could result in adverse reactions (any unwanted, unpleasant, noxious, or potentially harmful effect of a drug or medication), unnecessary hospitalization and possible poor outcomes. Findings: During a record review, Resident 42's admission record indicated Resident 42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), hypertension (a medical condition characterized by persistently elevated blood pressure),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based an observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 25 sampled Residents (Resident 16) was cared for in a manner that promotes, maintains and/or enhances his (Resident 16s) quality of life and individuality by failing to ensure Resident 16 by received routine personal hygiene (nail hygiene) services that meet the needs of residents. This deficient practice and the potential to result in Resident 16's loss of dignity, selfrespect, and identity that allows the resident to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a record review, Resident 16's admission record indicated Resident 16 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hyperlipidemia (abnormally high of fats in the blood), anemia, history of falling, fracture (break in a bone) of humerus (left arm) and pneumonia. During a record review, Resident 16's history and physical (H&P) dated 10/4/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for two of five residents (Resident 29 and Resident 71), the facility failed to: 1. Label the indwelling catheter (a flexible tube that is used to drain urine in the bladder) bag (a device forcollecting urine) labeled with date and time the facility changed the indwelling catheter bag for Resident 71. 2. Immediately notify a physician of the abnormal lab values for urinalysis (a laboratory test that examines a person's urine to detect any abnormalities or health conditions) and record in the resident's medical record regarding the change in condition evaluation (COC -a noticeable alteration in someone's health or circumstances that could have a significant impact on their well-being or the situation they're in) on 4/21/2025 for Resident 29. 3. Timely administer Ertapenem (an antibiotic - medication used to treat severe infections) 1 gram (GM -unit of measure in weight) intramuscularly (IM - inject medication into a muscle) antibiotics (medicines that fight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely administer Ertapenem (an antibiotic - medication used to treat severe infections) 1 gram (GM -unit of measure in weight) intramuscularly (IM - inject medication into a muscle) antibiotics (medicines that fight bacterial infections) leading to a nine-day delay of medication administration for Resident according to physician's order for urinary tract infection (UTI - an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) dated 4/24/2025. This deficient practice had the potential to result in hospitalization and/or death for Resident 29. Cross Reference F690 Findings: During a record review, Resident 29's admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 29 on 9/26/2023 and readmitted Resident 29 on 2/22/2025 with diagnoses including dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to clean the blood to stay alive because the kidneys are no longer functioning properly), urinary tract infection (UTI - an infection in the bladder/urinary tract) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for two of five sampled residents (Resident 26 and Resident 33), the facility failed to assess the individual needs and food preferences to ensure the menus and/or the resident's food plan met the nutritional needs and preferences for Resident 26. This deficient practice had the potential for insufficient food intake and weight loss for Resident 26. Findings: During a record review, Resident 26's admission Record indicated Resident 26 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (CHF- a weakened heart condition that causes fluid buildup in the feet, arms, lungs, and other body organs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-), atrial fibrillation (Afib-irregular heart beat), peripheral neuropathy (any nerve damage outside of the brain and spinal cord) and repeated falls. During a record review, Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 01/31/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 66) was served with the correct food portion per facility menu spreadsheet when serving meals to residents on 4/30/2025. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 66 to suffer unintentional weight loss. Findings: During a record review of Resident 66's admission record (face sheet - a document containing demographic and diagnostic information) indicated, Resident 66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: hemiplegia (paralysis that affects one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body, making it hard to perform everyday activities like eating or dressing), essential primary hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure not caused by a medical condition), and muscle weakness (when muscles are weak causing difficulty performing normal activities that require strength). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, for two of two sampled residents (Resident 19 and Resident 71) the facility staff failed to: 1. Observe infection control measures by failing ensure Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2 put on and use (don) personal protective equipment (PPE- not limited to gowns, and gloves) while providing Activities of daily leaving (ADL- self-care tasks necessary for daily functioning and maintaining independence) to Resident 19 who was on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP- infection control measures that expand the use of PPE, during high-contact resident care activities to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs - These are microorganisms, typically bacteria, that have become resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics). 2. Ensure that an indwelling catheter (a flexible tube that is used to drain urine in the bladder) bag (a device forcollecting urine) was labeled with date and time to indicate the indwelling catheter bag was changed. These deficient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff consulted with a physician, the Interdisciplinary team (IDT - a group of professionals from different specialties working together to provide care) or the faciity Bioethics committee (a group of individuals, often including doctors, nurses, ethicists, and community members, who help navigate complex moral and ethical questions in healthcare and research) regarding vaccinations for one of five sampled residents (Resident 33) who did not have a resident presentative and did not have the mental ability to make decisions. This deficient practice violated Resident 33's right to be supported and represented supported in making decisions regarding vaccinations and placed Resident 33 at increased risk for in infection and/or hospitalization. Cross reference F552 Findings: During a record review, Resident 33's admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 33 on 3/10/2021 and readmitted Resident 33 on 7/30/2023 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive (a state of decline in older adults…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation for one out four sampled Resident (Resident 19) by failing to ensure the resident's call light was in working condition and within reach. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact on the psychosocial well-being of the residents or result in delayed provision of necessary and emergent services. Findings: During a record review, Resident 19's admission record indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included indwelling urethral catheter (flexible tube, that is inserted into the urethra (the tube carrying urine from the bladder) and into the bladder to drain urine or administer fluids) hematuria (blood in the urine), difficulty walking, type II diabetes mellitus (condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage in the urinary tract that prevents urine from flowing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain essential lifesaving equipment, automated emergency defibrillator (AED, a portable device that can be used to treat a person whose heart has suddenly stopped working) machine at the designated nursing stations, Unit nursing stations and North and South Nursing stations. This deficient practice resulted in delayed life saving measures during Resident 1 ' s emergency resuscitation attempts by the facility staff on [DATE] at 7:34 PM. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated [DATE], the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia (an infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs), weakness, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that can lead to blood clots and increases the risk of stroke and other heart complications). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST-a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to ensure that the Licensed nurse (LVN) notified Resident 1 ' s family member (FM) about a change of condition (COC -a sudden or acute deviation from a patient ' s baseline that may lead to complications or death if left untreated) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Change of condition management guideline revised 9/11/2023, by failing to notify Resident 1 ' s FM after a COC occurred on 8/6/2024. This deficient practice violated Resident 1 ' s FM ' s right to be notified of Resident 1 ' s care services provided and had the potential to result in lack of proper care and services. Findings: A review of Residents 1 ' s admission Record indicated the facility initially Resident 1 on 9/1/2011 and readmitted Resident 1 on 8/30/2024 with diagnoses including diabetes (a disease in which your body does not produce enough insulin needed to control sugar levels in the blood), hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), and dementia (impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to ensure Resident 1 ' s call light (a device with a button or touchpad a resident uses to set off an alarm that flashes/rings to alert the facility staff the resident needs assistance) was within reach as indicated in the facility ' s Policy and Procedures (P&P) titled Call Light Answering revised on 9/11/23. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive emergency care or have a delay in care and services that could result in a fall or accident. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/29/2024 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), acute and chronic respiratory failure (acute respiratory failure-occurs when there is a sudden decrease in the ability to exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide between the lungs and blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate and report allegations physical abuse (willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish) for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to the Department of Public Health, Ombudsman (an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration), and to the local law enforcement in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Abuse and Crime Reporting effective 9/11/2023, by failing to report the unusual occurrence of a resident-to-resident altercation to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within 2 hours after the allegation occurred on 4/23/2024. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for elder abuse and delay onsite inspection by the Department of Public Health to ensure the residents' allegation of abuse was investigated. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare and store food in safe and sanitary condition and/or manner to prevent growth of microorganisms when: 1. Hairnets were not worn in the kitchen according to the facility's policy and procedures. 2. Hand hygiene and apron change were not performed during dishwashing when transition from dirty dishes to clean dishes. 3. Drinks and other food items were left at bedside for Resident 33 without proper storage and/or refrigeration for over 14 hours. Those deficient practices had the potential to cause foodborne illness (infections or irritations of the gastrointestinal tract caused by food or beverages that contain harmful bacteria, parasites, viruses, or chemicals) among 75 of 85 residents, who received the food from kitchen. Findings: a. A review of the Facility Resident Census and Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool and matrix (is used to identify pertinent care categories), indicated there were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate storage and conduct inventory for personal belongings for homelike environment for one of six sampled residents (Resident 38). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 38 storing personal belongings in several boxes on the floor and the resident complaining of having lost some personal belongings. Cross Reference F584 Findings: A review of Resident 38's admission Record indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (a disease in which your body does not produce enough insulin needed to control sugar levels in the blood) and morbid obesity (when a person's weight is more than 80 to 100 pounds above their ideal body weight). A review of Resident 38's History and Physical Examination dated 11/9/23 indicated, Resident 38 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Provide appropriate bed to accommodate one of six sampled residents (Resident 38). 2. Ensure call light was within reach for one of 28 sampled Residents (Resident 29). These deficient practices had the potential to result in Resident 38 developing new pressure injuries (Injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin), and for staff not to meet Resident 29's needs, which could place the resident at risk for incidents. Findings: a. A review of Resident 38's admission Record indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (a disease in which your body does not produce enough insulin needed to control sugar levels in the blood) and morbid obesity (when a person's weight is more than 80 to 100 pounds above their ideal body weight). A review of Resident 38's History and Physical Examination dated 11/9/23 indicated, Resident 38 had the capacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for one of six sampled residents (Resident 38). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 38 storing personal belongings in boxes on the floor. Cross Reference F557 Findings: A review of Resident 38's admission Record indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (a disease in which your body does not produce enough insulin needed to control sugar levels in the blood) and morbid obesity (when a person's weight is more than 80 to 100 pounds above their ideal body weight). A review of Resident 38's History and Physical Examination dated 11/9/23 indicated, Resident 38 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 38's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 3/1/24, indicated the resident had intact cognition (capable of remembering, learning new things, concentrating, or making…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and identify environmental hazards and risk factors for accidents for one of twenty-eight sampled Residents (Resident 35). This deficient practice had the potential to result in, harm through ingestion of hazardous liquid leading to poisoning and/or allergic reactions (A condition in which the immune system reacts abnormally to a foreign substance), unnecessary hospitalizations, and even death. Findings: A review of Resident 35's admission record indicated Resident 35 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (high sugar in the blood), chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD- is a common lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), pneumonia (an infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs) and congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs.) A review of Resident 35's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 65) received continuous feeding of isosource 1.5 (Nutritional formula) as per physician's order, This deficient practice had the potential to cause inadequate nutrition for Resident 65. Findings: A review of Resident 65's admission Record indicated Resident 65 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including moderate protein-calorie malnutrition (poor nutrition), dysphagia (swallowing difficulties), and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (a common condition in which the stomach content move up into the esophagus). A review of Resident 65's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 3/1/24, indicated Resident 65's cognitive skills (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) for daily decision-making were impaired. The MDS indicated Resident65 was dependent to substantial/maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pain was managed in a timely manner for one of four sampled residents (Resident 33). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 33 experiencing unnecessary pain. Findings: A review of Resident 33's admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease (hardening of the arteries [blood vessels that distribute oxygen -rich blood to the entire body] cause by buildup of plaque [small, abnormal patch of tissue on a body part or an organ] in the inner lining of an artery of native coronary [relating to heart] artery with unspecified angina), autonomic neuropathy (damage to the nerves that control automatic body function), and heart failure (when heart muscle does not pump blood as well as it should). A review of Resident 33's History and Physical (H&P - physicians' examination of patient), dated 7/26/23, indicated Resident 33…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Provide functioning call light to one of six sampled residents (Resident 37). 2. Ensure call light was within reach for one of 28 sampled Residents (Resident 29). This deficient practice had the potential for staff not to the needs for Residents 37 and 29, which could result in physical and emotional harm to the residents. Findings: a. A review of Resident 37's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 Diabetes (a disease that results in blood sugar being too high), lung transplant, heart failure and major depressive disorder (decreased interest in pleasurable activities, feelings of guilt or worthlessness, lack of energy, poor concentration, appetite changes, psychomotor retardation or agitation, sleep disturbances, or suicidal thoughts). A review of Resident 38's History and Physical Examination dated 4/3/24 indicated, Resident 37 had the capacity to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a functioning call light (the primary method of patient-nurse communication in a hospital setting, often used as a measure of nurse responsiveness) for two of five selected residents (Residents 1 and 3). This deficient practice had the potential to result in staff delay in meeting resident's needs for hydration, toileting, and activities of daily living as well as a delay in provision of assistance which may lead to falls and accidents. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, legal blindness (some vision, but the field of vision may be very narrow or blurry. Or may have blind spots that glasses cannot correct), generalized anxiety (usually involves a persistent feeling of anxiety or dread that interferes with how you live your life), and major depressive disorder (a common and serious medical illness that negatively affects how…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policy by failing to report an alleged abuse related missing funds to the state agency (Department of Public Health) within 2hrs after the allegation was reported by Resident 1. This deficient resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the Department of Public Health and had potential to place all 77 residents in the facility at risk of elder abuse through misappropriation of funds. Findings: On 1/23/2024 at 9:25am an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate an allegation regarding Physical abuse of Resident 1. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated; facility originally admitted the 72yr old female on 08/24/2018 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), morbid Obesity (weight is more than 80 to 100 pounds above their ideal body weight), abnormality of Gait and mobility (an unusual walking pattern that may be caused by underlying health conditions) and weakness.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the care, assistance, and supervision needed to ensure an environment free of risks and hazards for one out of one sampled resident (Resident 1), by failing to safely transfer Resident 1 from the wheelchair to the bed with an ordered Hoyer lift (a patient lift used by caregivers to safely transfer patient) on 1/4/2024. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 falling on 1/4/2024 during the transfer sustaining a laceration (deep cut) on the right lateral (outer part) leg with bleeding severe enough to require transport to the hospital. Findings: On 1/23/2024 at 9:25am an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate an allegation regarding Physical abuse of Resident 1. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated; facility originally admitted the 72yr old female on 08/24/2018 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems), morbid Obesity (weight is more than 80 to 100 pounds above their ideal body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations for resident needs and preferences for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) by not providing showers as Resident 1 preferred. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1 ' s wellbeing, level of satisfaction with life, self-worth, and self-esteem due to lack of and/or delay in receiving sufficient services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Findings: A review of admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including sepsis (a life-threatening condition that arises when the body ' s response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs), major depressive disorder (a mental disorder that have a persistent feeling of loss of pleasure or interest in life), and acute and chronic respiratory failure (condition in which your blood does not get enough oxygen or has too much carbon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate and report allegations of either verbal abuse (mocking, insulting, ridiculing; yelling, with the intent to intimidate), neglect (failure to provide necessary care and services to avoid harm), or physical abuse (willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish) for one out of four sampled residents (Resident 1) to the Department of Public Health, Ombudsman (an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration), and to the local law enforcement in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure within five (5) working days of the allegation. This resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the Department of Public Health to ensure the residents' allegation of abuse was investigated which could also lead to a delay in prevention abuse for all 84 residents in the facility. Cross Reference: F610 Findings: A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its abuse prevention policy by failing to report an allegation of abuse within 24 hours or in accordance with state or federal law for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to result in unidentified abuse in the facility and failure to protect all 84 facility residents from abuse. Cross Reference F609. Findings: A review of admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including sepsis (a life-threatening condition that arises when the body ' s response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs), major depressive disorder (a mental disorder that have a persistent feeling of loss of pleasure or interest in life), and acute and chronic respiratory failure (condition in which your blood does not get enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide). A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bowel and bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent reoccurrence of urinary tract infection (UTI - an infection that can occur in any area of the urinary tract, including the ureters, bladder, kidneys, or urethra) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) by failing to ensure Resident 2 ' s skin remained clean, dry and free of irritation. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the resident's physical comfort and psychosocial well-being and had the potential for formation of pressure sores (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) and a buildup of bacteria and a reoccurrence of infection. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system, including the kidney,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor two of two sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) for specific target behaviors for the use of Risperdal and Zyprexa (antipsychotic medications used to treat psychosis, a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection from reality) respectively. This deficient practice had the potential to result in overuse of an antipsychotic medication, without adequate indication for use, nonpharmacological interventions, or monitoring for the effectiveness and/or ineffectiveness of the medication; and could increase Resident 1 and Resident 2 ' s risk of adverse drug reactions and potential to not recognize or address the residents ' underlying causes of behavior (e.g., pain, discomfort) or psychosocial stressors (e.g., loneliness). Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1 's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/25/2022 and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1 's diagnoses included Dementia (a progressive disease that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the facility pest free (free of cockroaches and flies), maintain the facility clean, prevent pest harborage areas, and maintain an effective pest control program. As a result of the noncompliance, Resident 1 was transferred to the general acute care hospital 1 (GACH 1) on 8/23/2023, and reported maggots (small, wormlike fly larva [a worm-like creature, which emerges from an egg]) were found in Resident 1 ' s left heel wound upon admission in the Emergency Department (ED). Resident 1 needed intravenous (IV – administering fluid medication through a needle or tube inserted into a vein) antibiotics (medication that fight bacterial infection) and amputation (removal of the limb) below the knee (BKA) was performed. Findings: A. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated that Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II DM, sepsis (a life-threatening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its incident reporting for residents and visitors ' policy for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to report an unusual occurrence to the State Survey Agency and send a written report within 24 hours for Resident 1 after they were made aware by General Acute Care Hospital 1 (GACH 1) that maggots were found in Resident 1 ' s left heel wound. This deficient practice resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the Department of Public Health and had potential to place other residents at risk for neglect. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated that Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), sepsis (a life-threatening condition that arises when the body ' s response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 10 sampled residents by failing to implement a comprehensive and resident-centered care plan regarding Resident 1 diagnosis and left heel wound. This deficiency findings placed Resident 1at risk of further delay of wound healing and treatment of the disease. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated that Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus ((DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), sepsis (a life-threatening condition that arises when the body ' s response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs) and chronic kidney disease (CKD-a longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate setting of the low air loss mattress (LAL-a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds) was properly set up for three of 10 sampled residents (Resident 1) according to the residents' needs and professional standard of care. These deficient practices placed Resident 1 at risk to develop a pressure injury (bed sore-localized damage to the skin and or underlying soft tissue over bony prominence) or at risk of poor wound healing of the current pressure ulcer. Findings: A. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated that Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II DM, sepsis (a life-threatening condition that arises when the body ' s response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs) and chronic kidney disease (CKD-a longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure). A review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 10 sampled residents, Resident 1 received the nutritional management for patient with diabetes by administering the ordered enteral tube feeding (TF - a method of supplying nutrients directly into the stomach) formula of Diabetisource (a unique carbohydrate blend includes pureed fruits and vegetables to help with the nutritional management of patients with diabetes or stress-induced hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), instead Resident 1 was observed receiving Fibersource TF (formulated with fiber to meet the nutritional needs for tube feeding patients with normal or elevated calorie and/or protein requirements and has higher carbohydrate content). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 receiving the incorrect TF formula and not receiving the correct nutrition ordered by the physician and puts resident at risk of hyperglycemia (high blood glucose). Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-10-28 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services as follows: 1. [NAME] 1 failed to describe how to properly calibrate (calibration is the process of configuring an instrument to provide a result for a sample within an acceptable range) thermometers; 2. [NAME] 1 failed to describe acceptable quaternary ammonium compound (a type of chemical that is used to kill bacteria, viruses, and mold) sanitizer range; 3. Trayline Staff 1 failed to describe how to properly sanitize when manually washing dishes; and 4. Trayline Staff 1 failed to describe when to discard the ReadyCare vanilla shakes. These failures had the potential to result in unsafe and unsanitary food preparation and production and food-borne illness. Findings: 1. During an interview on 10/25/2021, at 7:47 a.m., with Dietary Supervisor (DS), she stated cooks and trayline staff calibrated thermometers. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/25/2021, at 7:48…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accidents and hazards for three out of three residents, (Resident 28, Resident 46 and Resident 69) by failing to 1. Pad bed siderails for Resident 28, 2. Safely store Resident 46's personal belongings, 3. Assist Resident 69 while pouring hot coffee in a common area of the facility. These deficient practices had the potential to result in accidents and/or harm to the residents. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 28's admission Record indicated, the facility admitted Resident 28 on 07/30/2021 with diagnoses including: generalized idiopathic epilepsy (form of epilepsy in which seizures come from the entire brain at once) and epileptic syndromes (group of features usually occurring together i.e. types of seizures commonly seen, part of the brain involved, usual course), intractable (hard to control), with status epilepticus (seizure lasts longer than five minutes or seizures occur close together), hyperlipidemia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. Administer the correct amount of oxygen (O2-a gas necessary to sustain life) per physician's order for two of six sampled residents (Residents 19 and 31). Residents 19 and 31 were on oxygen therapy. b. Date and initial oxygen nasal cannulas (devices used to deliver supplemental oxygen placed directly on a resident's nostrils) for five of six sampled residents (Residents 31, 45, 49, 54, and 234). Residents 31, 45, 49, 54, and 234 were on oxygen therapy. These deficient practices had the potential for to develop respiratory distress and or respiratory infection for Residents 19, 31, 45, 49, 54, and 234. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 19's admission Record, indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 19 was originally on 2/18/2021, and was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses not limited to asthma (long term lung disease making it more difficult to breathe) related to congestive heart failure (CHF-a heart condition which the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-28 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when seven lunch items at the trayline (A system of food preparation, used in hospitals, in which trays move along an assembly line) were measured below the required temperature set by the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in food-borne illness in medically vulnerable residents who consumed the food prepared by the facility kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/25/2021, at 11:35 a.m., with Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the kitchen, the DS stated that temperature of hot foods set up at the trayline should be at least 140°F (Fahrenheit-Unit of temperature). Seven lunch items on the steam table at the trayline were measured as follows: a) white rice: 129.6°F; b) corn: 129.6°F; c) regular beef patty: 125°F; d) pureed meat sauce: 124 - 135°F; e) pureed zucchini: 132°F; f) pureed pasta: 136.4°F; and g) alternative chicken: 137°F. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow menu as written for residents on puree diet (a texture-modified diet in which all foods have a soft, pudding-like consistency). 11 of 81 residents on pureed diet received inaccurate portion. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to receive inadequate protein and caloric intake when not following the menu, which could result in undernutrition or overnutrition and further compromise the residents' health status. Findings: A review of the facility's recipe titled, Whole Grain Spaghetti with Zesty Meat Sauce, undated, indicated that pureed pasta's regular portion should be served with a #8 scoop providing a half cup, and pureed meat sauce's regular portion would be 6 oz (ounces). During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/25/2021, at 12:24 p.m., with [NAME] 1, in the kitchen, [NAME] 1 was using a #12 scoop providing a third cup for pureed pasta and a serving spoon providing 8 oz for pureed meat sauce. When asked about the serving size, [NAME] 1 stated she made a mistake on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-10-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared per the recipe and methods that conserved flavor and failed to have performance improvement activity addressing the concern of food palatability for Resident 17. This deficient practice had the potential to result in decreased food intake for the residents who consumed food prepared in the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 17's admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 17's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fibromyalgia (a disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain accompanied by fatigue, sleep, memory and mood issues), and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 7/19/2021, indicated Resident 17 had moderately impaired cognition (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-10-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when two(2) raw meats in a refrigerator were kept beyond their use by date. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the food quality and to result in food-borne illness to the residents who may consume the food. Findings: During an observation on 10/25/2021, at 8:24 a.m., with Dietary Supervisor (DS) and [NAME] 1, in the kitchen, the following items were observed in a 3-door refrigerator (i.e. refrigerator #2): a) approximately 20 pounds of raw chicken was in a metal pan with a label indicating that its use by date was 10/21/21; and b) approximately 5 pounds of bacon was in a metal pan with a label indicating that its use by date was 10/23/2021. During a concurrent interview on 10/25/2021, at 8:24 a.m., [NAME] 1 stated that raw meats should be used within 3 days. [NAME] 1 further stated she should not use the expired items and did not know why she missed the expired meat items. According…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care for two of 39 sampled residents (Residents 63 and 236) in a manner that promoted or enhanced resident's dignity and respect by failing to ensure urinary drainage bags (designed to collect urine drained from the bladder via catheter or sheat) were covered with a privacy bag. This deficient practice had the potential to cause psychosocial harm to the residents and violate residents' right to be treated with dignity. Findings: A review of Resident 236's admission Record indicated Resident 236 was re-admitted in the facility on 10/21/2021, with diagnoses including, pneumonia (infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs which may fill with liquid), diabetes mellitus (DM-a condition that affects the body processes blood sugar), cellulitis (bacterial skin infection) of bilateral lower leg, obstructive and reflux uropathy (a disorder characterized by the blockage of the normal flow of contents of the urinary tract) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a call light (a device used to notify the nurse the resident needs assistance) that was easily accessible to one of two sampled residents (Resident 58). This deficient practice had the potential for delayed care for Resident 58. Findings: A review of Resident 58's admission Record, indicated Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis (bacterial skin infection that causes redness, swelling, and pain) weakness, and anemia (low levels of red blood cells in the body). A review of Resident 58's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized resident care screening and assessment tool), dated 09/16/2021 indicated Resident 58's cognition (ability to understand, remember, learn, and make decisions of daily living) was moderately impaired. The same MDS indicated, Resident 58 needed extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfer, walking in room and corridor, locomotion on and off the unit, dressing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records were updated to show documentation that advance directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) were discussed and written information were provided to the residents and/or responsible parties for one of the 39 sampled residents, (Resident 11). This deficient practice violated the residents' and/or the representatives' right to be fully informed of the option to formulate their advance directives and had the potential to cause conflict with the residents' wishes regarding health care. Findings: A review of Resident 11's admission Record indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including type II diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]), and cerebral infarction (occurs because of disrupted blood flow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement person-centered care-plan interventions (measurable short-term and long-term objectives, timetables, and actions to meet the needs of each resident) per facility policy for two of two residents (ResidentS 58 and 28). This deficient practice had the potential to not meet the physical, psychosocial, and functional needs of the resident and cause harm. Findings: A review of Resident 58's admission Record, indicated Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cellulitis (bacterial skin infection that causes redness, swelling, and pain) weakness, and anemia (low levels of red blood cells in the body). A review of Resident 58's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized resident care screening and assessment tool), dated 09/16/2021 indicated Resident 58's cognition (ability to understand, remember, learn, and make decisions of daily living) was moderately impaired. The same MDS indicated, Resident 58 needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff were trained on how to operate, and use approprate low air loss mattress (LAL-a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds) settings that were consistent with manufacturer's guide and physician order for one of 39 sampled residents (Resident 234). These deficient practices placed Resident 234 at risk to develop a pressure injury (bed sore-localized damage to the skin and or underlying soft tissue over bony prominence). Findings: A review of Resident 234's admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 234 on 10/11/2021, with diagnoses not limited to fracture (break in a bone) of the sacrum (bone at the bottom of the spine and lies between the fifth segment of the spine and the tailbone), emphysema (lung condition that causes shortness of breath), thoracic aortic ectasia (enlargement of the aorta [main artery that carries blood away from the heart to the rest of the body], malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body), hypoxemia (low level of oxygen in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to ensure that a indwelling catheter (a flexible plastic tube inserted into the bladder to provide continuous urinary drainage from the bladder) urinary bag drainage was off the floor for one of 39 sampled residents (Resident 236). This deficient practice had the potential to result in urinary tract infection (UTI- an infection in any part of the urinary system, the kidneys, bladder and urethra) for Resident 236. Findings: A review of Resident 236's admission Record, indicated the facility re-admitted Resident 236 on 10/21/2021, with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, pneumonia (infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs which may fill with liquid), diabetes mellitus (DM-a condition that affects the body processes blood sugar), cellulitis (bacterial skin infection) of bilateral lower leg, obstructive and reflux uropathy (a disorder characterized by the blockage of the normal flow of contents of the urinary tract) and weakness. A review of Resident 236's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to change enteral feeding (a special liquid food mixture containing protein, carbohydrates, fats, vitamins, and minerals, administered through a tube into the stomach) syringes (used for measurement and administration of medicines, flushes and feeds via oral or enteral routes) daily per facility's Enteral Feedings-Safety Precautions policy and procedures for two of 39 sampled residents (Residents 45 and 48) . This deficient practice had the potential to result in infection that can lead to complications. Findings: a. A review of Resident 45's admission Record, indicated the facility re-admitted Resident 45 on 8/19/2020, with diagnoses not limited to metabolic encephalopathy (problem in the brain that is caused by chemical imbalance in the blood), cerebral infarction (also called ischemic [stroke that occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain]), osteoarthritis (a condition where by protective flexible tissue at the ends of bones wear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Insertion of Peripheral Intravenous (IV) Catheter policy and procedures by not indicating the date and time of insertion of a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV-a catheter placed into a peripheral vein to administer medication and fluids) for one of 39 sampled residents (Resident 236). This deficient practice had the potential for PIV to remain in place beyond 72 hours and was a potential risk of infection for Resident 236. Findings: A review of Resident 236's admission Record, indicated the facility re-admitted Resident 236 on 10/21/2021, with diagnoses not limited to pneumonia (infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs which may fill with liquid), diabetes mellitus (DM-a condition that affects the body processes blood sugar), cellulitis (bacterial skin infection) of bilateral lower leg, obstructive and reflux uropathy (a disorder characterized by the blockage of the normal flow of contents of the urinary tract) and weakness. A review of Resident 236's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-10-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to 1) Properly date a medication for one out of one resident (Resident 145); 2) Safely secure treatment supply room (where wound care supplies and medications are kept) door. These deficient practices had a protencial to result in unauthorized access and use of biologicals (a diverse group of medicines) in treatment supply room and the use of an ineffective medication for resident. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 145's admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 145 on 10/16/2021 with diagnoses including: anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that interfere with one's daily activities) hypertension (high blood pressure) and weakness (state or condition of lacking strength). A review of Resident 145's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized care screening and assessment tool), dated 09/16/21, indicated Resident 145's cognition (ability to understand, remember, learn, and make decisions of daily living) was intact. The same MDS indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-10-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection precaution and prevention as one of 39 sampled residents (Resident 69) poured his own hot coffee from the coffee cart unassisted and walked out with uncovered cup. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the spread of infection to both staff and residents. Findings: A review of Resident 69's admission Record indicated the resident was re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 69's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bloodstream infection (bacterial or fungal infection that enters the bloodstream), urinary tract infection (UTI- infection in any part of the urinary system [kidneys, bladder, or urethra]), diabetes mellitus (DM-a condition that affects the body processes blood sugar), malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition), weakness and difficulty in walking. A review of Resident 69's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated 9/10/2021, indicated Resident 69 had an intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft. -unit of measure) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 37 resident rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate useable living space for the residents and working space for the health caregivers.Findings:During a record review, the facility Request for Room Size Waiver letter, dated 5/5/2025, submitted by the Administrator, indicated, there are 37 rooms not meeting the 80 square feet requirement per resident according to federal regulation. This waiver is in accordance with the special needs of the residents. These rooms are utilized for higher acuity residents requiring more care. Also, this waiver is in accordance with special needs of the residents and does not adversely affect the health and safety of the residents or impede the ability of any resident from attaining his or her highest practicable well being.During a record review of the Client…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft. -unit of measure) per resident in multiple resident bedrooms for 38 out of the 38 resident rooms. 30 rooms consist of 2 beds each and 8 rooms consist of 3 beds in each room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate useable living space for the residents' safety and freedom and working space for the staff to provide resident care. Findings: A review of the Request for Room Size Waiver letter, dated 4/18/24, submitted by the Administrator (ADM), indicated there are 36 rooms not meeting the requirement of 80 square feet per resident according to federal regulation. The letter indicated that the room sizes would not interfere with the daily nursing care or safety of the residents. The letter also indicated there would be enough space to provide for each resident's care, dignity and privacy in those rooms which are in accordance with the special needs of the residents. The letter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$117,037 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $117,037 — penalty dated 2023-09-15
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CULVER WEST HEALTH CENTER LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2014 |
| MAULTASCH, ROSS | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/01/2014 |
| JACOBS, HARRY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2014 |
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055350. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.