Garden Crest Rehabilitation Center
909 Lucile Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90026 · For profit - Corporation · 72 certified beds · (323) 663-8281 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0603), cited Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 26% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.6% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.6% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.4% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 34.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 58% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.4%CMS range 29.9–58.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 7.8–18.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 34.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 72 beds and averages 60.0 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY c. A review of Resident 48's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 48 on 1/26/2022, with diagnoses including repeated falls and pneumonia (an infection that inflames the air sacs in one or both lungs). A review of Resident 48's MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 48 had moderately impaired cognition and the resident required limited assistance with one-person physical assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs, such as transferring, walk in room and corridor, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene). A review of Resident 48's Physician's History and Physical (H&P) dated 1/27/2023, indicated the resident had fluctuating (changing) capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 48's Physician's Orders dated 6/7/2023, indicated to place a wander guard alarm on the resident at all times during every shift. A review of Resident 48's Care Plan dated 6/7/2023, indicated Resident 1 had an episode of wandering and he was trying to leave the facility through the back entrance.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who was cognitively impaired (trouble remembering, learning new things, concentrating,), identified as a high fall risk, and had a history of falls, the facility failed to: - Identify interventions related to Resident 1's specific risks and causes to try and prevent the resident from falling, per facility policy Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, -Ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT - a group of healthcare professionals from different disciplines [nurses, social worker, therapist, physician, etc.] that provide care for the residents) meets to assess the appropriate level and number of staff required to supervise Resident 1 and identify interventions and means of mitigating the risk of fall for Resident 1. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 having an unwitnessed fall on 7/6/2023 and 8/3/2023 and developed an acute to subacute right intertrochanteric femoral fracture with mild posterior…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) to meet the needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) assessed and identified as at risk of wandering(unsupervised movement within a secure area) and elopement (when a resident leaves/escapes from a facility without a physician's order and without the staff knowing) on 5/7/2026. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to have received inadequate care and/or supervision which led to Resident 1's elopement from the facility on 5/11/2026 and sustaining a fall.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/7/2026, with diagnoses that included parkinsonism (a progressive brain disorder that occurs when nerve cells in the brain die or become damaged) unspecified,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately notify the physician of change in treatment when one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was readmitted back from the General Acute Care Hospital(GACH) after a treatment for ruling out fracture (break or cause to break) on 12/27/2025 with right arm device upon readmission. This deficient practice has the potential for Resident 1 not provided with proper care and treatment from the Primary Care Physician (PCP). During a record review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities).During a record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool), dated 12/23/25 indicated that Resident 1's cognitive (thought process) was severely impaired. The MDS indicated that Resident 1 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by not: Completing a comprehensive assessment for one of three sample Residents (Resident 1) after readmission from General Acute Care Hospital (GACH).2. Informing and obtaining order from the Primary Care Physician (PCP) of the discharge instruction of for application, splint (a support device made of hard material that keeps an injured area from moving), right posterior (back) long arm. Developing and implementing resident centered care plan for right arm device for one of three sample residents (Resident 1), 3.Monitoring the use of the right arm device for one of three sample residents (Resident 1). These deficient practices had the potential to result in harm to Resident 1, including compromised circulation (poor blood flow) of the right arm, skin integrity breakdown, nerve compression, pain, swelling, and decrease functional use of the extremity. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate (observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the physician's order, manufacturer's specifications for the preparation and administration of the medication or biological, and professional standards of practice) was not five percent (5%) or greater. On 12/16/2025 at 9:31 AM, Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) failed to administer Simethicone (an anti-gas medication used to relieve symptoms like pressure, bloating, and fullness caused by excess gas in the stomach and intestines) and Aspirin (makes blood less sticky, preventing platelets from clumping and forming dangerous clots that cause heart attacks, strokes, and other vascular issues) timely for one out of three residents (Resident53) observed during the medication administration. This failure resulted in a cumulative med error rate of 7.14% observed during the medication administration and placed Resident 53 at risk of experiencing abdominal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store over the counter (OTC, medication available without a prescription for treating mild ailments) medications at proper temperature controls in one of one medication stockroom, as per the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled Storage of Medications dated 5/2025. This failure had the potential to expose medication stored in the stockroom to extreme temperatures leading to a decrease in medication efficacy (how well a medication works or its ability to produce the intended result) and the potential for all 56 residents to receive ineffective medication.Findings: During an interview on 12/17/2025 at 2:08 PM with Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1), RN 1 stated the facility had one medication room and a stockroom where OTC medication was stored. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/2025 at 2:20 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the facility's stockroom was observed. The stock room was observed with shelves that stored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and distribution practices, by failing to:1. Ensure three of three dry food storage containers stored in the kitchen's dry storage room, were labeled with a use by date (the last day the manufacturer guarantees the food's peak quality, flavor, and nutrient value). 2. Ensure seven of seven scoops used for dry storage foods were not left stacked upon each other, dirty. 3. Ensure 19 of 19 food dome covers (bell-shaped or dome-shaped lid used to cover food) were not stored next to a trash receptacle used for the disposal of paper towels. These deficiencies had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness to residents who received food from the facility's kitchen.Findings: During the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary supervisor (DS) on 12/15/25 at 7:50AM, three dry storage containers were observed in the kitchen's dry storage room labeled rice, flour,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation (claim that someone did something wrong) of misappropriation (taking or using someone else's money or belongings without their permission) of resident property immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) for one out of one sampled resident (Resident 63) on 5/16/2025. As per the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation (treating someone unfairly or taking improper advantage of them for personal gain, using a resident's vulnerability, or situation for one's own benefit) or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, dated 1/2025. This deficient practice delayed an onsite inspection by the California Department of Public Health to ensure Resident 63's allegation was investigated. This deficient practice also had the potential to place Resident 63 at further risk for abuse.Findings: During a review of Resident 63's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Range of Motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) and mobility (ability to move) treatments and services to prevent and/or limit a decline in joint (where two bones meet) for two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) by failing to ensure to: -Complete a Joint Mobility Assessment (JMA, a tool that evaluates a joint's ability to move through its full range of motion by measuring flexibility, stiffness, and quality of movement) accurately and quarterly for Resident 1. -Follow the Physical Therapy recommendations as indicated in Resident 1's JMA. -Provide Passive Range of Motion (PROM, movement at a given joint with full assistance from another person) exercises to Resident 1's right hand as ordered by the resident's physician. -Provide ROM exercises as ordered by Resident 3's physician. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 and Resident 3 to develop a decline in ROM, and contractures (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to conduct the Joint Mobility Assessment (JMA, a tool that evaluates a joint's ability to move through its full range of motion by measuring flexibility, stiffness, and quality of movement) accurately for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1).This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience a decline in Range of Motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint).Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/30/2021 with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), type 2 diabetes (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones due to lack of calcium and Vitamin D), osteoarthritis (a progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage), and contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain infection control procedures for two of four sampled residents (Residents 2 and Resident 3) by failing to:-Ensure Restorative Nursing Aide 1 (RNA 1) cleaned and disinfected a gait belt (safety device worn around the waist that can be used to help safely transfer a person from one surface to another) in between use for Resident 2 and Resident 3.-Ensure RNA 1 used the appropriate cleaning agent to effectively clean and disinfect a cloth gait belt after providing Restorative Nursing Aide services (RNA, nursing aide program that helps residents maintain their function and joint mobility) services to Resident 2 and Resident 3.These failures placed Resident 2 and Resident 3 at risk for potential infections that could cause a decline in the residents' health and quality of life.Findings:During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 6/28/2025 with diagnoses including a local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe care and services for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by failing to: 1.Ensure Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA1) and CNA 2 provided two-person physical assistance (help from two person) when they (CNA1 and CNA2) assisted Resident 1 who had a diagnosis of osteoporosis (weak and brittle bones), contracture (a stiffness, shortening at any joint, that reduces the joint's range of motion) with activities of daily living (ADL's, activities related to personal care including bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, bathing, turning, and eating). This failure had a high potential for Resident 1 to sustain injuries and harm. Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 7/30/2021 with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), age -related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident abuse to the State Survey Agency (SSA, the Bureau of Health Facility Licensing, Certification and Resident Assessment, within the Department of Health, which is responsible for nursing facility certification and for conducting surveys to determine compliance with Medicare and Medicaid requirements) and the Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities) within two hours for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to result in a delay of an onsite inspection by the SSA and had the potential for Resident 1 to experience ongoing abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/30/2021 with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), type 2 diabetes (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), anxiety (a feeling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the policy and procedures for discharge planning were followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in the resident not being properly informed and involved in their discharge plan. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record dated 5/16/25 indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including; diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) hypertension (HTN— high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (AFib— a heart rhythm disorder where the upper chambers of the heart [atria] beat irregularly and rapidly), hyperlipidemia (HLD— a condition characterized by elevated levels of fats in the bloodstream) and chronic kidney disease (CKD— a progressive and irreversible condition where the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter waste and excess fluid from the blood). During a review of Resident 1 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolatedProtect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility to honor the right of a resident to be free from involuntary seclusion for one of the three sampled residents (Resident 1), by placing Resident 1 in isolation without a physician ' s order. This deficient practice had the potential to result in feelings of depression, loneliness, and psychological harm for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record, the facility admitted Resident 1 on 12/30/2024 with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 1 ' s physician orders dated 12/30/2024 at 5:15 pm, indicated, DROPLET (prevent the spread of infections that are spread through the air by coughing, sneezing, or talking. Precautions include wearing a mask, washing hands, and limiting movement outside of a patient's room) AND CONTACT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to implement its infection control policy by falling to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, Registered Nurse supervisor (RN) 1, and House Keeping (HK) performed hand hygiene (hand washing with soap and water and use alcohol-based hand sanitizer) while entering and exiting residents' rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], touching curtains, and bedside tables in the residents' rooms. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of infectious disease (disorders that are caused by organisms, usually microscopic in size, such as bacteria, viruses, fungi, or parasites that are passed, directly or indirectly, from one person to another). Findings: During an observation on 2/1/2025 at 8:45 AM CNA 1, observed carrying a clear trash bag with bare hands, threw the trash in a trash receptacle next room [ROOM NUMBER]. CNA 1 entered room [ROOM NUMBER], pulled a curtain at room [ROOM NUMBER] bed B and pushed a bed side table. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-15 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to report the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ - a method to collect staffing data from nursing facilities) for the 3rd quarter (April 1-June 30). This deficiency resulted in the inaccurate data reporting of direct care staff, providers, and vendors potentially placing the facility at risk of not implementing their policy. Findings: A review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) for the PBJ Staffing Data Report Fiscal Year Quarter 3 2024 (April 1 - June 30) indicated the metric was triggered for Failed to Submit Data for the Quarter. During an interview on 11/15/2024 at 12:28 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM) and payroll (Staff 1), Staff 1 stated she had been employed at the facility since 9/16/2024. The ADM stated there was no gap in between when Staff 1 started, and the last payroll staff exited. Staff 1 stated the PBJ was submitted quarterly and received from the payroll department. The ADM stated the previous payroll staff submitted the PBJ for the 3rd quarter in August 2024, but there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of four sampled residents (Resident 9, 32, and 46), who received hemodialysis (a medical procedure to remove fluid and waste products from the body) had an emergency dialysis kit (a collection of supplies that people with kidney disease can use in case of an emergency) at the resident's bedside. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to receive a delayed intervention during accidental bleeding. Findings: a. A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (kidneys suddenly become unable to filter waste products from your blood that can develop rapidly over a few hours or a few days) and dependence on renal dialysis (your blood is put through a filter outside your body, cleaned, and then returned to you). A review of Resident 46's dialysis care plan revised on 10/12/2024, indicated for the facility staff to check and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with dignity to promote enhancements of quality of life for one of three sampled residents (Resident 58). For Resident 58 the Physicians Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) indicating Do Not Resuscitate (DNR, when the heart stops beating, or a person stops breathing, there are no rescue measures taken, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] an emergency lifesaving procedure that is done when someone's breathing or heartbeat has stopped) was not honored. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 58 receiving CPR against his wishes and not in accordance with his documented POLST instructions ([DATE]) for DNR when Resident 58 was found unresponsive on [DATE]. Findings: A review of Resident 58's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (condition that occurs when the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood properly), benign…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 16). Resident 16's preferred activity preferences were not included in the Activities care plan. This deficient practice had the potential to prevent Resident 16 from having meaningful activity to promote and enhance the resident's quality of life. Findings: A review of the admission Record indicated Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy (the loss or thinning of muscle tissue that can lead to a decrease in muscle mass and strength), sacral pressure ulcer (lower spine wound), and dependence on oxygen. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) completed on 10/15/2024, indicated that while in the facility it was important for Resident 16 to have books, newspapers, and magazines to read. The MDS indicated Resident 16 did not have any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b. A review of Resident 214's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (a type of stroke that occurs when a blood clot forms in the brain), hemiparesis (a condition that causes weakness or an inability to move on one side of the body), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 214's MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 214 did not have signs or symptoms of cognitive patterns, did not present with symptoms of depressed, hopelessness or feeling down, but presented with feelings of isolation. Resident 214's MDS indicated the resident was dependent for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, showering, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. During concurrent observation and interview on 11/12/24 at 10:09 AM, in Resident 214's room, Resident 214 was laying in the bed, the call light within his reach. Resident 214 was on gastrostomy feeding (g-tube - a method of delivering food and medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received a monthly drug regimen review for one sampled resident (Resident 6). Resident 6's psychotropic medications (drugs that affect a person's mental state,Venlafaxine [an antidepressant and nerve pain medication] and Quetiapine [Seroquel], used for bipolar disorder) were not reviewed by the facility pharmacist for three months. This deficient practice caused an increased risk of adverse consequences associated with medication therapy. Findings: A review of Resident 6's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (a serious but treatable mood disorder that impacts how a person feels, thinks, and acts) and bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes extreme shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels). A review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 9/24/24, indicated the resident did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food properly in accordance with professional standards of practice when several food items in the kitchen were observed unlabeled and undated. These failures placed the residents at risk for food borne illness or contamination. Findings: a. During the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 11/11/2024 8:22 AM, one full pitcher of brown liquid was observed undated and unlabeled in the walk-in refrigerator. During a concurrent interview, the DS stated the pitcher contained apple juice and confirmed the pitcher was unlabeled and undated. The DS stated it was important to label the pitcher of juice because there was a potential for foodborne illness when resident receive food after the used by date. During an observation and concurrent interview with the DS on 11/11/2024 at 8:32 AM in the Dry Storage Room, three packs of bread were observed undated. The DS stated it was important the bread was labeled with a delivery date, so the staff knew when it was delivered. During a follow-up visit and observation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), who had dizziness and was administered Meclizine (medication used to prevent and control nausea, vomiting, and dizziness) four times a day, had a comprehensive person-centered care plan with appropriate interventions for Resident 1's physical, mental and psychological wellbeing. This deficient practice caused an increased risk in adverse reactions (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) to Resident 1. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/30/2022, with diagnoses including dementia (loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that the loss interferes with a person's daily life and activities), chronic pain syndrome (pain that lasts for longer than three months), and Type II diabetes mellitus (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy). A review of Resident 1's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), who was diagnosed with chronic pain syndrome (pain that lasts for longer than three months), received a Pain Assessment after a change of condition (a decline / worsening or improvement in a resident's mental, psychosocial, or physical functioning). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's psychosocial wellbeing and quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that the loss interferes with a person's daily life and activities), chronic pain syndrome and Type II diabetes mellitus (a long-term condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's Pharmacy Consultant (PC) thoroughly completed a monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR - a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences [unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have] and potential risks associated with medications) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice caused Resident 1 to receive medication that was not optimal his medical condition and increased the risk of adverse consequences from the medication therapy. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that the loss interferes with a person's daily life and activities), chronic pain syndrome (pain that lasts for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent and control the spread of COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease, a severe respiratory illness caused by virus and spread from person to person) in accordance to the facility's infection control policies and procedures and the facility Mitigation Plan (MP, a plan to reduce loss of life and impact of COVID-19 in the facility) titled Garden Crest Rehabilitation Center COVID-19 Mitigation Plan revised on 7/22/2024, for 3 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4) by failing to: 1. Ensure staff discarded and did not reuse their N95 mask (a respiratory protective device designed to form a seal around nose and mouth to achieve very efficient filtration) after exiting a room in the Red Zone (RZ, area for residents who have tested positive for COVID-19). 2. Perform fit testing (the method for finding the respirator that fits your face and making sure it provides a tight seal to help keep you protected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of state licensure for one of two sampled Licensed Vocation Nurses (LVN 2). These deficient practices had the potential for residents to not receive the appropriate level of care needed affecting quality of care and potentially leading to resident harm. Findings: A review of LVN 2 ' s employee file indicated LVN 2 ' s nursing license expired on [DATE]. A review of the facility ' s staffing assignment sheet dated [DATE] from 7AM to 3PM indicated LVN 2 was assigned to care and administer medications to 31residents. A review of the facility ' s staffing assignment sheet dated [DATE] from 7AM to 3PM, indicated LVN 2 was assigned to care and administer medications to 34 residents. A review of the facility ' s staffing assignment sheet dated [DATE] from 7AM to 3PM, indicated LVN 2 was assigned to care and administer medications to 33 residents. A review of the facility ' s staffing assignment sheet dated [DATE] from 7AM to 3PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses documented that: 1) 26 of 26 medications were administered on residents' medication administration record (MAR - a report detailing the drugs administered to a patient by a licensed healthcare professional at a facility) for Residents 2, 5, and 9. 2) Eight of Eight removed narcotic medications on the controlled drug record (narcotic sheet - a document to track the administration of controlled substances [narcotic medications which have a potential for abuse and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence]) for Residents 2, 5, 8, and 9. 3) The blood pressures (BP) were taken and or readings recorded prior to the administration of BP medications for Residents 2, 5. These deficiencies had the potential to: 1. Misrepresent the actual medications administered to residents, 2. Undercount the actual narcotics taken, residents may receive double doses of medications, and 3. 3. Misrepresentation of the narcotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two licensed nurses (licensed Vocational Nurse 4 [LVN 4] did not continue to provide care to residents in the facility during the period LVN 4's Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - is a lifesaving technique that's useful in many emergencies in which someone's breathing or heartbeat has stopped) certification had expired (no longer valid). This deficiency had the potential for LVN 4 not to stay up to date on the latest CPR techniques and placing the residents at increased risk to experience a decline in health status, function, hospitalization, and death. Findings: During a concurrent observation and record review of LVN 4's CPR card, indicated LVN 4's CPR card had expired on [DATE]. During an interview of LVN 4 on [DATE] at 4:04 PM, LVN 4 acknowledged that LVN 4's CPR card expired on [DATE]. LVN 4 stated LVN 4 took a CPR class on [DATE] but had not yet received the renewed CPR card via email but will follow-up. LVN 4 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and / or implement a resident specific care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to monitor and provide interventions for Resident 1 ' s right leg contracture (tightening of muscle to prevent normal movement to a body part). This deficient practice caused an increased risk in the worsening of the right leg contracture. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (high blood sugar levels that is not well controlled and caused blood vessels in kidneys to become damage), unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site (a joint disease most common in older persons), and other specified disorders of bone density and structure unspecified site (a progressive bone disease that decreases bone mass and weakens bone structure). A review of Resident 1's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control measure and prevention by failing to: 1. Ensure two of 16 sampled facility staff (Maintenance Assistant [MA] and Laundry 1 [LD1]) were wearing a mask while working together at the laundry room. 2. Ensure one of 16 sampled facility staff (Dietary Aid [DA1]) was wearing proper N95 (filtering facepiece respirator). DA1 modified the N95 mask with straps placed around his both ears. DA1 ' s N95 was also observed not covering his nose. 3. Ensure two of six sampled facility staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 [LVN1] and Certified Nursing Assistant 2 [CNA2]) were wearing proper N95 fit tested mask when entering a COVID-19 (Coronavirus- a deadly respiratory disease transmitted from person to person) isolation room. LVN1 was observed wearing a Honeywell DC365 (type of N95 mask) and was fit tested for a BYD (type of mask). CNA2 was wearing Honeywell DC365 and was unsure of which N95 mask she was supposed to wear. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of COVID-19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their medication error rate was less than five percent (%). Five medication errors out of 30 total opportunities contributed to an overall medication error rate of 16.67 % affecting two of six residents observed for medication administration (Residents 113 and 363). The deficient practice of failing to administer medications in accordance with the attending physician's orders increased the risk that Residents 113 and 363 can potentially experience health complications related to delayed medication administration times and one missed medication which could have negatively impacted Resident 113's health and well-being. Findings: During an observation of medication administration for Resident 113 on 11/13/2023 at 9:02 AM, the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) was observed administering the following medications to Resident 113: -Metformin (medication used to treat high blood sugar levels) 500 milligrams (mg, unit of weight) -Apixaban 2.5 mg (medication used to treat and prevent blood clots) -Cozaar 50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner to prevent the growth of microorganisms that could cause food borne illness as evidenced by failing to label and date various food items and failing to dispose of food items past their use by and/or expiration date. These deficient practices had the potential to place residents in the facility at risk for food borne illness and/or contamination. Findings: During an initial kitchen tour on 11/13/2023 at 7:5 AM, the following were observed: -An undated and unlabled open bag of hamburger buns in the dry storage area. -Nine cartons of prune juice with a receive date of 8/11/2023, and a use by date of 9/16/2023 in the dry storage area. -An undated jar of mayonnaise in the walk-in refrigerator. -Undated frozen packages of roast beef, pork ribs, and corned beef in the meat freezer. -Six boxes of undated ice cream in Freezer 1. -An undated and unlabeled open bag of frozen French fries, an undated and unlabeled bag of frozen corn, and an undated and unlabeled open bag of frozen bread…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident for 14 of 29 resident rooms (Rooms 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38). This deficient practice resulted in inadequate maneuvering space for one of thirty three sampled residents (Resident 113) and insufficient working space for provision of care. Findings: A review of the Room Size Waiver letter, dated December 13, 2022, submitted by the former Administrator for Rooms 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 and 38 was indicated the rooms did not meet the 80 square foot requirement per federal regulation. The letter indicated that all residents in these rooms were not hindered or affected by the size of the rooms and have mobility with walkers and/or wheelchairs. All of the basic furnishings were available to each resident, and they have sufficient closet, drawer, and storage spaces. The letter indicated bathrooms were easily accessible to all residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced residents' dignity and respect for two of six sampled residents (Resident 30 and Resident 39) by standing over the residents while assisting them during a meal. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents' sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Findings: a. A review of Resident 30's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/18/2021, with diagnoses including Parkinsonism (a brain condition that causes slowed movements, stiffness, and tremors) and repeated falls. A review of Resident 30's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/25/2023, indicated the resident had intact cognition (decisions consistent/reasonable) and was dependent for eating, toileting hygiene, showering and personal hygiene. During an observation on 11/13/2023 at 12:35 PM, in Resident 30's room, Certified Nursing Assistant 5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy titled Answering the Call Light, for one of 36 sampled residents (Residents 263). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in care and services and the resident's inability to ask for assistance. Findings: A review of Resident 263's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/12/2023, with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy (thinning of muscle mass) and hyperlipidemia (too many lipids [fats] in the blood). A review of the Physician's History and Physical of Resident 263, dated 11/13/2023, indicated Resident 263 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During an observation on 11/13/2023 at 8:05 AM, Resident 263 was observed in his bed. Resident 263's call light was hanging down from his bed and not within his reach. Resident 263 was unable to find his call light to call for assistance. During an observation on 11/13/2023 at 8:07 AM with the facility's Director of Staff Development (DSD), Resident 263's call light was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's notice of transfer was provided to the resident's responsible party and to the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (public advocate) as soon as practicable for one of three sampled residents (Resident 46). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident's responsible party being unaware of how to contact the State agency and how to appeal a discharge or transfer if necessary. Findings: A review of Resident 46's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/7/2023 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure (a condition when the lungs cannot release enough oxygen into the blood), congestive heart failure (a condition in which the heart does not pump blood as efficiently as it should), Type II diabetes (a condition that occurs when the body cannot use insulin properly resulting in persistently high blood sugar levels), atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), malignant neoplasm of the right breast (breast cancer), hemiplegia (weakness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the correct tube feeding (TF, a form of nutrition that is delivered into the digestive system as a liquid) was administered as ordered for one of 33 sampled residents (Resident 165). This failure had the potential to cause malnutrition and increase Resident 165's blood sugar. Findings: A review of Resident 165's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), intracerebral hemorrhage (a life-threatening type of stroke) and Type II Diabetes Mellitus (a disease that results in too much sugar in the blood). A review of the Physician's Orders for Resident 165, dated 10/30/2023, indicated to administer every shift Diabetisource AC (enteral feeding to help with the nutritional management of patients with diabetes or stress-induced hyperglycemia) at 55 milliliters per hour (ml/h, a unit of measurement for rates of administration) via enteral pump (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its Oxygen Administration policy and procedure for one of 36 sampled residents (Resident 24). Resident 24 was administered oxygen with no physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications associated with oxygen therapy. Findings: A review of Resident 24's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 4/14/2022, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure ( a condition where there's not enough oxygen in the body) with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body tissues). A review of Resident 24's Care Plan dated 4/10/2023, indicated Resident 24 had altered respiratory status (abnormal breathing) / difficulty breathing related to sleep apnea (a condition that causes you to stop breathing while sleeping) and acute respiratory failure. Resident 24's Care Plan further indicated the physician's order to administer oxygen at two liters per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain informed consent (a process by which residents or their responsible parties have the choice to accept or decline certain medication therapy or treatments once they are educated about the risks and benefits) prior to administering psychotropic medications (medications that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 25). This deficient practice denied Residents 25's right to be informed regarding the risks and benefits of psychotropic medication therapy. Findings: A review of Resident 25's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/17/2023, with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a mental health condition with feeling of worry, anxiety, or fear interfering with one's daily activities) and pneumonia. It also indicated the resident was discharged from the facility on 11/13/2023. A review of Resident 25's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 10/23/2023, indicated the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discard a bottle of Humulin R U-100 insulin (a short-acting medication used to treat high blood sugar) with an opened date of 10/1/2023 according to the manufacturer's requirements, affecting Resident 8 in one of two medication carts inspected (Medication Cart A). The deficient practice of failing to discard opened bottle of Humulin insulin within the date recommended by manufacturer (28 days after the open date) resulted in Resident 8 receiving 12 expired doses between 10/30/2023 and 11/14/2023. Findings: During an observation on 11/14/2023 at 11:55 AM of medication cart A with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 3), the following medication was found expired more than the 28 days as per manufacturer's requirements. -One vial (a small container made of glass for holding liquid medications) of Humalog insulin for Resident 8 was found opened and dated 10/1/2023. During a concurrent interview, LVN 3 stated routine checks of the medication cart for expired medications occurred on the 11 PM - 7 AM shift. LVN 3 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the nursing staff failed to revise a care plan for at risk for falls for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for recurrent falls. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the facility readmitted Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included a history of falling, osteoporosis and dementia (is a brain disorder that affects a person's ability to carry out daily activities and that may cause changes in mood and personality). A review of Resident 1 ' s high risk for falls care plan initiated 5/5/2020, indicated Resident 1 was at risk for falls related to dementia, poor safety judgement and a history of multiple falls. The goal indicated Resident 1 would be free of falls through the review date. The care plan interventions included to anticipate and meet the resident's needs, landing pads on floor, bed in low position, physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its Abuse Reporting and Investigation policy and procedure by failing to report an injury of unknown origin to the Department of Public Health (DPH) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). On 7/5/2023, Resident 1 developed skin discoloration, with a bump on the forehead and right upper eye lid. This deficient practice caused an increased risk of further injury for Resident 1. Cross Reference: F610, F689 Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (a condition where the body cannot pump blood well enough to give the body a normal body supply), end stage renal disease (occurs when the kidneys are no longer able to work at a level needed for day-to-day life), dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to clean the body ' s blood when the kidneys are not able to), dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning, thinking,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its Abuse Reporting and Investigation policy and procedure by failing to investigate an injury of unknown origin for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). On 7/5/2023, Resident 1 developed skin discoloration, with a bump on the forehead and right upper eye lid which was not investigated by the facility to determine if abuse was the cause. This deficient practice caused an increased risk of further injury for Resident 1. Cross Reference: F609, F689 Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure (a condition where the body cannot pump blood well enough to give the body a normal body supply), end stage renal disease (occurs when the kidneys are no longer able to work at a level needed for day-to-day life), dependence on renal dialysis (a treatment to clean the body's blood when the kidneys are not able to), dementia (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure 14 out of 18 (room [ROOM NUMBER], 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, and 38) resident rooms met the required 80 square feet per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space necessary to provide safe nursing care and privacy for residents. Findings: During a review of the facility's room wavier letter dated 12/4/2025, the letter indicated the facility was requesting a room variance (room size different from required amount) for 14 out of 18 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, and 38). The room waiver letter indicated the following rooms had less than 80 square feet per bed: Room Number Floor Area Capacity room [ROOM NUMBER] 151.69 2 room [ROOM NUMBER] 289.53 4 room [ROOM NUMBER] 150.5 2 room [ROOM NUMBER] 151.69 2 room [ROOM NUMBER] 150.5 2 room [ROOM NUMBER] 150.5 2 room [ROOM NUMBER] 150.5 2 room [ROOM NUMBER] 151.38 2 room [ROOM NUMBER] 149.63 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 14 out of 29 (Rooms 21, 22, 23, 24,25, 26,27,28, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, and 38) met the required 80 square feet per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate space necessary to provide safe nursing care and privacy for residents. Findings: During an observation on 11/15/2024 at 10:01 AM, the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) measured Rooms 21, 22, 23, 24,25, 26,27,28, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, and 38. The rooms measured as follows: Room No: Room Sq. Footage: Resident Capacity: Square Ft. Per 21 14'4x 10'7 2 151.69 22 20'1x 14'5 4 289.53 23 14'4x 10'6 2 150.5 24 14'4x 10'7 2 151.69 25 14'4x 10'6 2 150.5 26 14'4x 10'6 2 150.5 27 14'4x 10'6 2 150.5 28 14'4x 10'6 2 151.38 33 14'3x 10'6 2 149.63 34 14'3x 10'5 2 148.44 35 14'3x 10'3 2 146.06 36 14'3x 10'4 2 147.25 37 14'3x 10'3 2 146.06 38 14'3x 10'5 2 148.44 The measurements were compared to the client accommodation analysis dated 11/15/2024 and all measurements…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BARRON, PAUL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 100% | since 05/30/1980 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055161. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.