No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Grand Park Convalescent Hospital

2312 West 8th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90057 · For profit - Individual · 151 certified beds · (213) 382-7315 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (213) 382-7315 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Sep 2024
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
2208 W 7th St · (213) 330-9184 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2426 W 8th St · (213) 385-9926 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2214 W 7th St · (213) 487-4340 · Call to confirm hours
Park
662 S Alvarado St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
743 S Grand View St · (213) 382-5658

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased35.1%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.4%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.8%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.0%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms50.5%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.5%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.9%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.1%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.5%12.0%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.1%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission12.8%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit3.6%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.912.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.721.571.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

27.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

27.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.58U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.35hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 201 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 43% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF27.3%CMS range 19.9–35.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 9.1–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge62.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization4.6%CMS range 2.6–8.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.451.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.98
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.02
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 147.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.02 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.61 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-03)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-20)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolated
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Utility Nurses (licensed or unlicensed nursing support staff) had competency and skills assessment done upon hire and yearly for two of six sampled employees hired as Utility Nurses.This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the residents' safety when the Utility Nurses are not adequately trained.During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/7/26 at 11:19 a.m., the employee file of Utility Nurse 1 and Utility Nurse 2 was reviewed with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The DSD stated Utility Nurse 1 was hired initially in the dietary department and started working as Utility Nurse on 2/25/25. DSD stated Utility Nurse 2 was initially hired in the dietary department and started working as Utility Nurse on 8/19/25. DSD stated Utility Nurse 1 and Utility Nurse 2 had competency/checklist for the dietary department but there was no checklist/competency for working as Utility Nurse. DSD stated the competency should be done upon hire and yearly to ensure Utility Nurse 1 and Utility Nurse 2 were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to set the low air loss mattress (LALM - a specialized air mattress designed to prevent bedsores) to the correct settings for two out of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 36) This deficient practice placed the Resident 1 and Resident 36 at risk of discomfort, slow wound healing, and development of new pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence related to a medical or other device). Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included need for assistance with personal care (getting help with daily activities that involve taking care of yourself and your well-being, especially when you find it difficult to do those things on your own), pressure induced deep tissue damage (occurs when sustained pressure on the skin and underlying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights (a device that alerts healthcare providers that the patient needs assistance) were within residents' reach and easily accessible for two of two sampled residents (Resident 13, Resident 114). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delays in meeting the Resident 13 and Resident 114's needs for assistance, which could lead to accidents including falls. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted the resident on 12/9/2024 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disorder caused by chemical imbalances in the blood), need for assistance with personal care, dementia, psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality), chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should), and a history…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive and resident-centered dental care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 81). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delay in necessary dental care and services for Resident 81. Findings: During a review of Resident 81's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but not limited to encephalopathy (a change in brain function due to injury or disease), compression fracture (when a bone in your spine breaks and collapses) of the ninth to tenth thoracic vertebrae (bones that make up the middle part of your spine), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), panic disorder (an anxiety disorder that involves multiple unexpected panic attacks), and malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct quarterly review and revise a care plan for one of six residents (Resident 107) who was on Remeron (medication to treat treatment of major depressive disorder [MDD-persistent feeloing of sadness, loss of interest in activities, and changes in sleep, appetite, and energy levels). This failure had the potential to cause confusion related to the dosage of Remeron for Resident 107. Findings: During a review of Resident 107's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included MDD, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. During a review of Resident 107's Care Plan Report dated 6/12/2024, the Care Plan Report indicated the resident uses antidepressant (used to treat depression) related to feelings of hopelessness and worrying about his life status. The Care Plan Report interventions included to administer antidepressants medications (Remeron) as ordered by physicians,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the insulin (a hormone that works by lowering levels of glucose-sugar in the blood) injection sites were rotated when administered (given) to one of four sampled residents (Resident 99). This deficient practice had the potential to result in injection site reactions such as pain, redness, itching, hives (red and sometimes itchy bumps on the skin), swelling, inflammation, lipodystrophy (defect in the breaking down or building up of fat below the surface of the skin, resulting in lumps or small dents in the skin surface which may be caused by repeated injections of insulin in the same spot), lipoatrophy (wasting of fat under the skin which can be unsightly), and lipohypertrophy (buildup of fat under the skin which can slow the absorption of insulin) that may result in ineffective management of the residents' diabetes mellitus (DM - high blood sugar). Findings: During a review of Resident 99's admission Record, the admission Record indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete the smoking risk assessment (smoking safety evaluation, an assessment that helps determine a resident's ability to smoke safely, whether independently or with supervision, and to identify potential fire hazards) for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 133). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 133's safety, causing a smoking related injury and fire hazard in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 133's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 4/28/2025 with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (a condition that causes dysfunction to the brain, affecting its structure or function), type 2 diabetes (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), need for assistance with personal care, hypertension (high blood pressure), and heart failure (condition in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen). During a review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of four (4) medication carts was locked and secured when it was unattended in the hallway. This deficient practice had the potential for unauthorized access to medications, drug diversion, and/or drug pilferage. Findings: During an observation on 7/1/2025 at 8:25 AM, the licensed vocational nurse (LVN 2) was at the doorway of Resident 96's room preparing medication for administration. During an observation on 7/1/2025 at 8:30 AM, LVN 2 walked into Resident 96's room and left the medication cart unlocked in the hallway. During an observation and concurrent interview on 7/1/2025 at 8:34 AM, LVN 2 exited Resident 96's room and acknowledged that she did not lock the medication cart. During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedures (P&P), Storage of Medication (dated 3/1/2025), the P&P indicated that . Compartments . containing drugs and biologicals are locked when not in use. Unlocked medication carts are not left unattended .

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1.The nursing staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 [LVN 3] and Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 [LVN 4]) followed its enhanced barriers precautions (EBP, an infection prevention protocol to reduce the spread of certain drug-resistant bacteria, particularly in nursing homes) policy during the medication administration observation for two (2) of six sampled residents (Resident 36 and 23). 2. One of six residents (Resident 119) was provided with a proper identifier for enhanced barrier precautions. These deficient practices had potential to cause cross contamination, spreading the infection among residents, visitors and staff. Findings: 1. During a medication administration (med pass) observation on 7/01/2025 at 9:01 AM, on the wall behind Resident 36's bed, there was a sign indicating enhanced barrier precautions. LVN 3 was observed performing hand hygiene prior to proceeding to measure Resident 36's blood pressure and heart rate at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate in accordance with accepted professional standard and practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's discharge plan was reflected in Resident 1 ' s medical record. This deficient practice resulted in incomplete and inaccurate record for Resident 1 ' s discharge plan and goals. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoarthritis (progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage) and abnormities of gait and mobility. During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/15/24 indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. Resident 1 moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, lower body dressing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to implement its abuse policy and procedures when the facility failed to report to the Survey State Agency (SSA) an injury of unknown origin with 24 hours for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). On 8/16/2024 at 12:22 pm, Resident 1 was found on the floor with discoloration to the left of his face and a 0.5-centimeter (cm-unit of measurement) scratch to the right side of the nose. On 8/20/2024, the hemodialysis (a medical procedure to remove fluid and waste products from the blood) center reported to Resident 1's physician that the resident had bruising and swelling to the left side of the face. The physician ordered for Resident to be transferred to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for further evaluation and management. The facility never reported Resident's 1 injuries to the SSA. This deficient practice resulted in delayed investigation of Resident 1's injuries by the SSA. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of Coronavirus – 19 (COVID-19, COVID, a virus that causes respiratory illness that can spread from person to person) as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure that two of the four sampled residents (Residents 1 and 3) were wearing a mask while interacting with other residents in the hallway and at the nurses station. 2. Failing to ensure that Registered Nurse (RN) 1 were wearing N95 respirators (is a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) they were fit tested for (RN 1). These deficient practices had the potential to place both residents and staff at a risk for infection to COVID-19. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of an abuse in accordance with state and federal law for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). This resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the State Agency (SA) to ensure the safety of the residents and had the potential to result in unidentified abuse in the facility as well as failure to protect residents from any possible abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (condition in which your blood does not get enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), congestive heart failure (CHF-a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquid). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address the resident's pain level before, during, and after Restorative Nursing Assistant application (RNA - a Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] who helped patient's regain physical and cognitive ability after an injury or illness) for three of four sampled residents (Resident 52, Resident 92, and Resident 129). This deficient practice had the potential for residents to experience pain when not properly assessed. Findings: a. A review of Resident 52's admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted the resident on 10/31/2018 and re-admitted the resident on 4/27/2024, with diagnoses including polyarthritis (a condition that causes inflammation, pain, and stiffness in five or more joints at the same time), neuralgia (severe, sharp, and often shock-like pain that follows the path of a nerve) and need for assistance with personal care. A review of the Physician's Order dated 7/13/2023, indicated for Resident 52 to receive RNA for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by not labeling: -one plastic container of Aji- Mirin Sweet Cooking [NAME] seasoning with open and use by dates. -one plastic bag of carrots with open and use by dates. -one plastic bag of ginger with open and use by dates. -one plastic bag of Dried [NAME] with open and use by dates. -one plastic container of Salted Shrimp with no open and used by dates. In addition, the facility failed to discard several items by the use by date. These deficient practices had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/17/2024 at 8:03 A.M., the Dietary Assistant (DA) observed one plastic container of Aji-Mirin Sweet Cooking [NAME] seasoning, one bag of carrots, one plastic container of Salted Shrimp, one plastic bag of ginger, and one plastic bag of Dried [NAME] with no open or use by dates. There was one bottle of [NAME] vinegar with an open date of 2/7/2024 and a use by date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced residents' dignity and respect for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident 87 and 93), by standing over the residents while assisting them during a meal. These deficient practices had the potential to affect residents' sense of self-worth, self-esteem, and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: a. A review of Resident 87's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/6/2020, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorders the slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood, ranging from extreme high manic episodes to low depression episodes), and essential hypertension (a condition in which the blood vessels have persistently raised pressure). A review of Resident 87's History and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the resident's advance directive (a written instruction, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is unable to make decisions for themselves) was in the resident's medical chart and the Advance Directive Acknowledgement form was completed thoroughly for two of seven sampled residents (Residents 92 and Resident 140). These deficient practices had the potential for the facility to not honor the residents' medical decisions regarding end-of-life treatment. Findings: A review of Resident 92's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/2/2024, with diagnoses including abnormalities in gait and mobility (a change to your walking pattern), osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time), and fibromyalgia (a disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain accompanied by fatigue, sleep, memory, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report the following incidents to the State Survey Agency (SSA, the Bureau of Health Facility Licensing) within the appropriate timeframe for two of six sampled residents (Resident 13 and Resident 195) as evidenced by: -For Resident 13, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin (an injury that the source was not observed by any person or could not be explained by the resident). -For Resident 195, the facility failed to report a fall with injury. These deficient practices resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) to ensure Resident 13's injury of unknown origin and Resident 195's fall with injury were investigated. Findings: a. A review of Resident 13's admission Record (face sheet) indicated the facility readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for hospice (a specialized type of care that provides physical comfort and emotional, social, and spiritual support for people nearing the end of life) one of six sampled residents (Resident 123). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 123 to not be provided with necessary and personalized care. Findings: A review of Resident 123's admission Record indicated the facility readmitted the resident on 5/31/2024 with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of the stomach (cancer [a disease in which abnormal cells divide uncontrollably and destroy body tissue] of the stomach), encounter for palliative care (specialized medical care for people living with a serious illness, such as cancer or heart failure [occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should]), severe protein-calorie malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function), and sepsis (a serious condition in which the body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety measures were assessed and implemented for one of six sampled residents (Resident 134) by failing to initiate a smoking risk assessment when the facility was aware the resident was a smoker. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 134 to be at risk for injury or burns without a proper assessment. Findings: A review of Resident 134's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/16/2024, with diagnoses including abnormalities of gait and mobility (a change to your walking pattern), hypertension (high blood pressure) and diabetes mellitus (chronic metabolic disease that occurs when the body did not produce enough insulin or cannot use insulin properly). A review of Resident 134's admission Nursing Risks assessment dated [DATE], indicated the resident did not smoke, which did not prompt the document to allow safety measures to be reviewed and implemented. A review of Resident 134's History…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided care and nutrition consistent with their weight loss assessment and the Registered Dietitian's (RD) recommendations for one of four sampled residents (Residents 133). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident's weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 133's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/7/2024 and readmitted him on 4/7/2024 with diagnoses including end stage of renal disease (final, permanent stage of chronic kidney disease, where kidney function declined to the point that the kidneys can no longer function on their own), dependence on renal dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) and depression (an illness characterized by persistent sadness and a loss of interest in activities, accompanied by an inability to carry out daily activities). A review of Resident 133's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a new tube feeding (a way to provide nutrition when you cannot eat or drink safely by mouth, delivered through a gastric tube [G-tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach]) set was used when starting a new tube feeding bottle for one of six sampled residents (Resident 124). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 124 to experience infection control issues and experience tube feeding intolerance symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and abdominal discomfort. Findings: A review of Resident 124's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/17/2024 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, gastrostomy (G-Tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach), dysphagia (difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to accommodate resident needs for two of two sampled residents (Resident 28 and 99). This deficient practice had the potential for the residents to not receive timely and efficient care and needed services. Findings: a. A review of the Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA) Assignments for 5/19/2024, indicated that on 5/19/2024, eight CNAs were working during the 11 PM-7 AM shift attending 147 residents. On 5/19/2024, one CNA was no call, no show and was not replaced. Her assignment was split between eight working CNAs during the 11 PM-7 AM shift, each CNA was assigned to 17-19 residents. A review of Resident 99's admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted the resident on 1/31/2024 with diagnoses that included need for assistance with personal care, severe morbid obesity (a disorder that involves having too much body fat, which increases the risk of health problems), hypertension (high blood pressure), and chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0848 — isolated
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include verbiage in the Arbitration Agreement (a contractual agreement to settle disputes out of court using a neutral third party called an arbitrator) that allowed residents the freedom to choose a venue to meet. This deficient practice had the potential for residents who have entered into a binding arbitration agreement to have a say in a convenient meeting place for both parties. Findings: A review of the facility's undated Arbitration Agreement form, indicated there were no residents who entered into a binding arbitration agreement for selection of a venue of choice that was convenient. During an interview on 6/20/2024 at 11:10 AM, the Admissions Coordinator (AC) stated the form did not indicate where the residents would meet. The AC stated having that verbiage would be a good thing to add so the residents who have entered into a binding arbitration agreement would have a say in where the meeting spot would be. During an interview on 6/20/2024 at 11:57 AM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) stated the form did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to re-admit one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). Resident 1 who was ready to be discharged from the general acute hospital (GACH 2) on 1/19/24, the facility refused to re-admit Resident 1. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 not given his right to return to the facility. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 9/22/23 with diagnoses including morbid obesity (more than 80 to 100 pounds [lbs., unit of measurement] of their ideal body weight) and chronic obstructive respiratory disease (COPD, group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing related problems). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool) dated 9/25/23, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact (mental process involved in knowing, learning, and understanding). Resident 1 needed two-person physical assistance with eating, personal hygiene and three-person physical assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and bathing. During a review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-14 · tag F0943 — isolated
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all employees of the facility participated in the facility yearly mandatory abuse training program which included types of abuse, neglect, and the process of reporting. This deficient practice had the potential for employees to not recognize abuse and thereby affect all residents in the facility. Findings: During a review of the facility In-Service Meeting Minutes dated 3/6/23 indicated an in-service was given with the topic of abuse, neglect, and reporting. The sign-in sheet indicated 46 employees attended the in-service. On 7/5/23, another in-service with topic that discussed resident rights and abuse. The sign-in sheet indicated 33 employees attended the in-service. During a concurrent interview and record review of the facilty ' s In-Service sign in sheet dated 7/5/2023, on 8/14/23 at 11:10 am, the director of staff development (DSD) stated mandatory abuse in-service were given every year. DSD stated the mandatory abuse in-service was given on 7/5/23 and all employees of the facility must attend. DSD stated there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accident hazards for four of 11 sampled residents (Resident 9, Resident 10, Resident 60, and Resident 110). For Residents 9 and 110, yellow arm band and name plate were not provided to indicate fall risk. For Resident 60, physician's order was not implemented regarding floor mats and bed alarm and Resident 10 kept a smoking lighter at bedside. These deficient practices placed Resident 9, 60, and 110 at increased risk for falls and complications related to fall injuries, and placed Resident 10 at increased risk for injuries related to smoking. Findings: a. A review of Resident 9's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/23/2021 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning), anxiety disorder (a mental disorder characterized by feelings of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of her individuality for four of 24 sampled residents (Resident 16, 19, 37 and 75) by failing to: -Provide independence and dignity by standing over the resident while assisting resident during dining for Resident 16. -Ensure Resident 19, 37 and 75`s urinary drainage bags (designed to collect urine drained from the bladder via a catheter) were covered with privacy bags. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the residents` psychosocial wellbeing and loss of dignity. Findings: a. A review of the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 16 on 6/29/2021 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a person's daily functioning), functional quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), and need for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had specific choices and treatments communicated through an Advance Directives and copies of the Advance Directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) maintained in the Resident's clinical record for two of 24 sampled Residents (Residents 55 and 110). This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 55 and 110 not be given the right to accept or refuse specific medical treatments and have those options honored. Findings: a. A review of Resident 55's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/15/2021, with dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily functioning/life), hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), and Type II diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]). A review of Resident 55's recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor six of six sampled residents (Residents 6, 21, 28, 77, 97 and 111) rights by not providing them with written instructions regarding how to file a formal grievance. This deficient practice had the potential to deny the rights of residents to have complaints and concerns addressed. Findings: a. A review of Resident 6's admission record (face sheet) indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 12/4/2019 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS - a progressive nervous system disease that affects nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord, causing loss of muscle control) and ataxia (abnormal, uncoordinated movements). b. A review of Resident 21's face sheet indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/23/2021 with diagnoses of deep vein thrombosis (a blood clot formed in one or more of the deep veins in the body), anemia (low number of red blood cells), and bipolar disorder (mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label eternal feeding (a way of delivering nutrition directly to stomach via tube) flush bag with date, time, and initials for one of three sampled residents (Resident 85). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to develop eternal feeding associated complications such as infection or diarrhea, and lead to serious illness or hospitalization. Findings: A review of Resident 85's admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 85 on 9/2/2014 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including gastrostomy (an opening in the stomach made surgically for food), Unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance (a group of conditions characterized by impairment of at least two brain functions such as memory loss and judgment), major depressive disorder ( a mental health disorder characterized by low mood and loss of pleasure in life) and syncope (temporarily loss of consciousness caused by fall in blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-17 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the daily staffing schedule was posted for 11 consecutive days. This deficient practice had the potential of depriving the residents and their love ones of knowing who was providing direct patient care and services to the their loved ones and violating the resident's rights. Findings: On 12/16/2021, at 9:11 AM, during an inspection and observation of the facility, the daily staffing sheet titled, Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD), dated 12/5/2021, was not posted or visible to residents and visitors. During an interview on 12/16/2021, at 9:13 AM, the Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated the current staffing form posted was dated 12/5/2021. The DSD stated DHPPD form on 12/5/2021 was posted by the DSD, then left for vacation, and the assistant was to take on this task. The DSD stated he was not sure if there was a policy and procedure covering posting of the staffing hours. During an interview on 12/17/2021, at 8:32 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated staffing nursing daily staffing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to account for two doses of controlled medications [(illegal or prescription drugs regulated by the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen - medication use for pain) and (Clonazepam - medication use to treat seizures, panic disorder, and anxiety)] that were missing during inspection of the medication cart 2A. This deficient practice had the potential of resulting to Residents 38 and 313 missing a dose of medication, increase pain and anxiety and a decline in the quality of life for both residents and divergence of medications at the hands of unlicensed staff. Findings: On 12/16/2021, at 11:06 a.m., during Medication Cart 2A, inspection, a discrepancy was observed on the narcotic count form and the amount of medication remaining in the bubble pack (a medication packaging system that contains individual doses of medication per bubble) for the following residents: 1. One dose of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (a combination controlled medication used for pain) 5-325 milligram (mg - [unit of measure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items such as three undated frozen Chocolate Cream pies were stored in the freezer without opened or used dates and had no label. This deficient practice had the potential of resulting to the growth of microorganisms that could cause food spoilage and placing the residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings: During the initial tour of the kitchen with the facility`s Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS) on 12/13/2021, at 7:50 a.m., three Chocolate Cream pies were observed in the freezer without opened or used dates and it was not labeled. During an interview with DSS on 12/13/2021, at 8 a.m., DSS stated all food stored in the freezer should be dated with the opened and used dates and labeled. The DSS stated frozen chocolate cream pies were improperly stored in the freezer which could resulted to food bone illness. During an interview on 12/16/2021, at 2:15 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated all food in the freezer needed to be labeled with dates. A review of facility`s undated policy and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-17 · tag F0912 — isolated
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure space requirements of 80 square feet for each resident were met in resident bedrooms which had the potential to result in inadequate space to provide safe nursing care and privacy for one of 87 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]). Findings: On 12/13/2021, at 8 a.m., during a general inspection of the facility, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed that measured less than the required 80 square footage per Resident in Resident bedroom. During an interview on 12/13/2021, at 8:47 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility had a room waiver for the rooms that did not meet the required 80 square footage per resident. A review of the undated Client Accommodations Analysis submitted by the facility indicated the following rooms with their corresponding measurements: Room# No: of Beds Total Square feet/Total Square Ft per Resident 66 3 210.30/70.1 The square footage requirements for a three-bed capacity room is at least 240 square…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 72 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) met the required space at least 80 square feet for each resident. This failure had the potential to affect the delivery of care, safety, and privacy of the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/3/2025 at 9:25 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], Maintenance supervisor (MS) measured the room. The MS stated the room measured 10'8.5 x 19'9 = 213.69 sq. ft. The room was clean and free from clutter and obstruction. During an interview on 7/3/25 at 9:26 AM with Certified Nurse Assistant 5 (CNA 5) , CNA 5 stated the room feels regular. The room is kept low clutter and easily accessible. During a review of the Client Accommodations Analysis dated 7/3/2025, the Client Accommodations Analysis indicated the room measurements for room [ROOM NUMBER] was 10'8.5 x 19'9 = 213.69 sq. ft., with three beds The square footage requirements for a three-bed capacity room must be at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure space requirements of 80 square feet for each resident were met for one of 87 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]). This deficient practice resulted in inadequate space to provide safe nursing care and privacy. Findings: During multiple room observation conducted in room [ROOM NUMBER], from 6/17/2024 to 6/20/2024, between the hours of 7:30 AM to 4 PM, observations of nursing staff showed adequate space to provide care to the residents, and each resident was provided privacy curtains for privacy. There were no concerns observed related to space or to the safe provisions of care to the residents residing in the room. A review of the Room Waiver letter dated 6/18/2024, from the Administrator, indicated the room waiver would not adversely affect the health and safety of the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER]. A review of the Client Accommodations Analysis dated 6/20/2024, indicated the following rooms with their corresponding measurements:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KOHN, BARRYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 01/01/1991
ZEMEL, ELLIOTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/24/2025
CONSTANTINO, MARIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2025
GONZALEZ, MARIOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/07/2004
HERNANDEZ, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/16/2024
MORALES, ISAUROIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2024
PAK, SUNNYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/20/2023
SCHMUKLER, YEHUDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2012
SOLOMON, ILANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2025
TADEO, MARISELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/02/2009

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$18.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$426K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 72%Medicare 20%Other / private 8%

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $426K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$394per resident / day
operating cost
$11,986per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$394per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056244. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next