Grand Park Convalescent Hospital
2312 West 8th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90057 · For profit - Corporation · 151 certified beds · (213) 382-7315 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Jul 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 35.1% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 50.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.3% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.2% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.1% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 12.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.91 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.72 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
27.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 201 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.96 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 97% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 27.3%CMS range 19.9–35.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 9.1–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 90.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 4.6%CMS range 2.6–8.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.45 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 147.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.45 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.02 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.51 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2026-07-23 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview record review, the facility failed to ensure their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ - information of the provider's daily staffing hours for the appropriate care of the residents) data had been submitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for one of four required quarters (third quarter from 4/1/25 to 6/30/25) in 2025. This deficient practice had the potential to cause delays in care, treatment, and services necessary to maintain physical and emotional wellbeing for all facility residents.Findings:During a review of PBJ Staffing Data Report dated 7/21/26, the PBJ Staffing Data Report indicated the facility failed to submit data for the third quarter covering 4/1/25 to 6/30/25. During an interview on 7/23/26 at 9:23 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the PBJ had to be submitted quarterly, which was every three months. The DON stated that the Accounting and Payroll Department were responsible for gathering payroll and staffing information. The DON stated that the compiled payroll and staffing information were then sent to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure to provide the necessary care for two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 10) reviewed for unnecessary medications such as psychotropic (any drug that affects the mental function, behavior, and mood) by failing to:-Ensure Resident 1 was not prescribed and administered (given) Seroquel (generic name quetiapine - a medication used to treat schizophrenia [a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought] and bipolar disorder [sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs]) without an appropriate clinical indication (the reason the doctor recommended a specific test, medicine or treatment) and diagnosis.-Ensure to provide non-pharmacological interventions (health treatments and strategies that do not use medications) before Resident 1 was administered Seroquel.-Ensure as needed (PRN) order for Xanax (a prescription medication that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the standardized recipes and food serving guide according to the menu and cook's spreadsheet (food portioning and serving guide) instructions on 7/20/2026 lunch service when: 1.Nine fortified diet trays did not receive fortified foods (diet enhanced to increase caloric content of food) and the Dietary Aide (DA2) did not read out the orders for cooks to serve, and 16 regular menu and consistent Carbohydrate diet (CCHO diet) trays received 1/2 cup of the potato and corn instead of 1/4 cup. 2. Kitchen staff failed to ensure minced and moist texture rice was prepared according to the IDDSI-Level Five minced and moist foods-(All foods prepared for this diet must be soft, moist with all excess fluid drained, and minced to size no larger than 4mm fits through the gaps of fork prongs) when 2 lunch trays received steamed rice that was sticky and not moist. These deficient practices had the potential to result in meal dissatisfaction, affecting nutritional status for 9 residents who were on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and preparation practices in the kitchen when: 1.One Dishwasher (DW) working in the dish machine area did not wash hands and change gloves when removing the clean and sanitized dishes from the dish machine and after touching soiled dishes and trash. 2.The ice machine was not maintained in a sanitary manner; the inner plastic board inside the ice storage bin had yellow stains and residue. 3.Food brought to residents from outside of the facility, including leftovers, were stored in the resident food refrigerator with no date and not monitored for the expiration date. There was no monitoring system for the refrigerator temperatures. There were two cups of ice cream that were melted and stored in the resident refrigerator. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to food borne illness (infectious organisms or their toxins are the most common cause of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-07-23 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure trash stored in two of five garbage dumpsters areas was maintained in sanitary manner, the dumpsters were, clean, completely closed, and not overfilled with trash. This failure had the potential to result in pests (organisms that cause harm to humans such as flies, cockroaches, and rodents) entering the facility and spreading diseases to residents.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 7/20/2026 at 8:35 AM, one large dumpster for food and organics was located outside of kitchen back door and was not covered. The dumpster was overfilled with food trash and not covered. There were flies on the trash bags inside the dumpster and around the bin. There was trash on the grounds around the dumpster including disposable gloves and paper. During the same observation in the trash area another trash bin was overfilled and not covered. During a concurrent interview with the DS on 7/20/2026 at 8:35AM, the DS stated the dumpster lids should have been covered and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to respect the residents' rights to dignity (the right to be valued and treated as a worthwhile human being) and privacy (is the right to keep your physical body covered and protected from unwanted viewing) for two of six sampled residents (Resident 4 and Residents 11) by failing to ensure to: - Provide Resident 4's privacy curtain and drape during a G-Tube (gastrostomy tube-is a soft, flexible feeding tube inserted directly through the skin of the belly into the stomach) bolus administration (feeding procedure of giving a measured meal of liquid formula into a stomach feeding tube all at once, usually using a large syringe driven by gravity or a gentle push) procedure. - Provide Resident 11 with a foley catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) privacy bag cover (a fabric pouch or sleeve that hides a medical urine collection bag). These failures have the potential to cause Resident 4 and Resident 11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call lights (devices that alert healthcare providers that residents need assistance) were within reach for two of 27 sampled residents (Residents 65 and Resident149) by failing to:-Ensure Resident 65 call light was not hanging over the head of the bed and Resident 149's call light was not on the floor.This failure placed Resident 65 and Resident 149 at risk for delayed assistance.Findings:During a review of Resident 65's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 65 on 1/19/2018 and re-admitted the resident on 6/26/2026 with diagnoses including heart failure (heart is not pumping blood as well as it should), diabetes mellitus 2 (DM 2-a medical condition characterized by the body's inability to regulate blood sugar levels), respiratory failure (lungs can't get enough oxygen into your blood or remove enough carbon dioxide), hypertension (HTN-the force of blood flowing through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolatedNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a background check during the pre-employment screening for one of one sampled staff (the Administrator [ADM]). This failure had the potential to place residents (in general) at risk for abuse.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/22/2026 at 2:01 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the ADM's employee file was reviewed. The DON stated the ADM's date of hire was 4/2/2012. The DON stated there was no evidence of a background check before the ADM began working in the facility. The DON stated all staff (in general) were required to complete a background check-up on hire. During an interview on 7/23/2026 at 9:30 PM with the DON, the DON stated the Director of Staff Development (DSD) was responsible for initiating background checks for all employees during the pre-employment screening. The DON stated the DSD was not available for interview due to a family emergency. The DON stated a background check was completed for the ADM in December 2017, after the facility discovered the discrepancy. The DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) was transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS, a federal health insurance program) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 109) when Resident 109 was discharged from the facility on 2/9/2026.This failure had the potential to result in delayed discharge care for Resident 109.Findings:During a review of Resident 109's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/12/2025 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain malfunction caused by a systemic medical problem, chemical imbalance, or organ failure in the body), type 2 diabetes (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hypertension (high blood pressure), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental ability), chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition where the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person- centered baseline care plan for one of five sampled residents (Resident 15) reviewed for smoking upon admission by failing to: -Ensure to address Resident 15's smoking status, smoking related needs and individualized interventions to ensure Resident 15's safety. This failure had the potential for Resident 15 not to receive the necessary smoking -related safety care and needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 15's admission Record, the admission record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 15 on 8/18/2023 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs) unspecified, and essential hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure). During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a resident specific comprehensive care plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) for two of 27 sampled residents (Resident 10 and Resident 14) reviewed for care plans by failing to: -Ensure to implement and revise Resident 10's smoking care plan to prevent smoking accidents. -Ensure to develop a specific individualized care plan for Resident 14 who had a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and was at a high risk of falling. These failures resulted for Resident 10 to sustain a cigarette burn to her right hand and had the potential for Resident 14 to fall and sustain an injury and/or fracture (broken bones). Findings: a. During a review of Resident 10's admission Record (a single-page summary document containing a resident's personal, medical, and insurance information), the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 10 on 6/16/2026 and readmitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services to minimize risk of development and worsening of pressure injuries/ulcers (PI/PU-localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 111) reviewed for PI/PU by failing to: -Ensure to have the correct weight setting of a low air loss mattress (LALM-operates using a blower-based pump that was designed to circulate a constant flow of air) when the machine setting did not match Resident 111's weight. This failure had the potential for placing Resident 111 at risk for skin breakdown and PI/PU. Findings:During a review of Resident 111's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 111 on 2/26/2026 and readmitted the resident on 5/5/2026 with diagnoses including pneumonia (lung infection), sepsis (medical emergency when the body overreacts to an infection), hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), and dementia ((a decline…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care, assistance, and supervision to ensure an environment free of risks and hazards for three out of six residents (Resident 10, Resident 14, Resident 15) by failing to:1. Provide direct supervision to Resident 10 when smoking in the facility's smoking patio as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Smoking Policy & Procedures, last reviewed by the facility on 1/23/2026. 2. Ensure Resident's 14 who was identified as at risk for falls had floor mats (thick, cushioned pads placed on the floor next to a bed to soften the impact if a person falls) placed on both sides of the bed as per physician's orders dated 4/13/2026. 3. Ensure Resident 15 had a smoking safety evaluation (a check to see if a resident can smoke or vape without hurting themselves or others, covering mental clarity, physical coordination, and safety rules) assessed and documented as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update and post daily staffing information for three of six sample days (7/18/2026, 7/19/2026, and 7/20/2026).This failure had the potential to cause inadequate staffing and for the residents (in general) needs to go unmet.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/20/2026 at 9:02 AM with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) in front of Nursing Station 1, the Direct Care Services Hours Per Patient Hours (DHPPD, the actual hours of work performed per patient day by a direct caregiver) for 7/15/2026, 7/16/2026, and 7/17/2026 were posted on the announcement board. The ADON stated the posted DHPPD needed to be updated daily to reflect any changes with the census and staffing.During an interview on 7/22/2026 at 3:41 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the Director of Staff Development (DSD) was responsible for posting the projected (beginning of shift) and actual (end of day) DHPPD. The DON stated the DSD was not available for interview due to a family emergency. The DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders and professional standards of practice for two of eight sampled residents (Residents 100 and Resident 131) reviewed for medication administration by failing to: -Ensure Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 (LVN4) followed Resident 100's physician's order instructions to flush Resident 100's gastrostomy tube (g-tube - a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for people with swallowing problems) with 50 milliliters (mL- a unit of measurement for volume) of water before and after medication administration. -Ensure Resident 131's lidocaine patch (a medication in the form of a patch used to treat inflammation and pain) was removed from application site (right knee) as per physician's orders. -Ensure Resident 131's lidocaine patch was only applied to the right knee and the right thigh in accordance with physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure medications in one of two medication rooms' refrigerator (Station 1 Medication Room Refrigerator) requiring refrigeration were stored at temperatures between 2 Celsius [( C) is a unit of temperature] (36-degree Fahrenheit [ F] is a unit of temperature] and 8 C (46 F) in accordance with manufacturer specifications and as per facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled Medication Storage in the Facility - Storage of Medications, dated 01/2025. 2a. Ensure Resident 155's unopened prefilled syringe of Lantus Solostar ([generic name - insulin glargine] a type of insulin [a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication] used to treat high blood sugar) in one of two inspected medication carts (Station 1 Medication Cart 1B) was stored in a refrigerator and/or labeled with an open date.2b. Ensure Resident 54's opened foil pack of budesonide (a medication used to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to: Maintain a safe and functional environment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) by monitoring Resident 1's whereabouts in the facility as indicated in Resident 1 comprehensive care plan for elopement (the act of leaving a facility unsupervised without prior authorization) precaution.Properly evaluate one of three sampled residents (Resident 1)'s Elopement Risk Evaluation (ERE - a numerical score used to determine the likelihood of a person, often a patient in a care setting, leaving a facility without authorization or staff knowledge) dated 6/4/2026.Reevaluate Resident 1's ERE after Resident 1 had eloped from the facility on 6/4/2026, 6/22/2026 and 7/15/2026 according to facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Wandering, Unsafe Resident.Revised Resident 1's Care Plan (CP) for elopement after Resident 1 had a change of condition on 6/4/2026 and 6/22/2026.These deficient findings resulted in Resident 1 eloping on 7/15/2026 and missing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to revise a care plan for at risk of elopement (leaving the facility unsupervised and without staff knowledge) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who left the facility unsupervised and without staff assistance and knowledge on 6/8/2026 and 6/22/2026.This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for recurrent elopement. During a review of the admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including metabolic encephalopathy (a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by some agent or condition-such as viral infection or toxins in the blood), unspecified dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and altered mental status (refers to a significant disturbance in a person's perception, thinking, memory, or level of consciousness). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 6/5/2026, the H&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Utility Nurses (licensed or unlicensed nursing support staff) had competency and skills assessment done upon hire and yearly for two of six sampled employees hired as Utility Nurses.This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the residents' safety when the Utility Nurses are not adequately trained.During a concurrent interview and record review on 1/7/26 at 11:19 a.m., the employee file of Utility Nurse 1 and Utility Nurse 2 was reviewed with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The DSD stated Utility Nurse 1 was hired initially in the dietary department and started working as Utility Nurse on 2/25/25. DSD stated Utility Nurse 2 was initially hired in the dietary department and started working as Utility Nurse on 8/19/25. DSD stated Utility Nurse 1 and Utility Nurse 2 had competency/checklist for the dietary department but there was no checklist/competency for working as Utility Nurse. DSD stated the competency should be done upon hire and yearly to ensure Utility Nurse 1 and Utility Nurse 2 were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to set the low air loss mattress (LALM - a specialized air mattress designed to prevent bedsores) to the correct settings for two out of two sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 36) This deficient practice placed the Resident 1 and Resident 36 at risk of discomfort, slow wound healing, and development of new pressure ulcers (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence related to a medical or other device). Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included need for assistance with personal care (getting help with daily activities that involve taking care of yourself and your well-being, especially when you find it difficult to do those things on your own), pressure induced deep tissue damage (occurs when sustained pressure on the skin and underlying…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-03 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights (a device that alerts healthcare providers that the patient needs assistance) were within residents' reach and easily accessible for two of two sampled residents (Resident 13, Resident 114). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delays in meeting the Resident 13 and Resident 114's needs for assistance, which could lead to accidents including falls. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted the resident on 12/9/2024 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a brain disorder caused by chemical imbalances in the blood), need for assistance with personal care, dementia, psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality), chronic kidney disease (a condition in which the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should), and a history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive and resident-centered dental care plan for one of one sampled resident (Resident 81). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delay in necessary dental care and services for Resident 81. Findings: During a review of Resident 81's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but not limited to encephalopathy (a change in brain function due to injury or disease), compression fracture (when a bone in your spine breaks and collapses) of the ninth to tenth thoracic vertebrae (bones that make up the middle part of your spine), bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs), panic disorder (an anxiety disorder that involves multiple unexpected panic attacks), and malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients your…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct quarterly review and revise a care plan for one of six residents (Resident 107) who was on Remeron (medication to treat treatment of major depressive disorder [MDD-persistent feeloing of sadness, loss of interest in activities, and changes in sleep, appetite, and energy levels). This failure had the potential to cause confusion related to the dosage of Remeron for Resident 107. Findings: During a review of Resident 107's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included MDD, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. During a review of Resident 107's Care Plan Report dated 6/12/2024, the Care Plan Report indicated the resident uses antidepressant (used to treat depression) related to feelings of hopelessness and worrying about his life status. The Care Plan Report interventions included to administer antidepressants medications (Remeron) as ordered by physicians,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the insulin (a hormone that works by lowering levels of glucose-sugar in the blood) injection sites were rotated when administered (given) to one of four sampled residents (Resident 99). This deficient practice had the potential to result in injection site reactions such as pain, redness, itching, hives (red and sometimes itchy bumps on the skin), swelling, inflammation, lipodystrophy (defect in the breaking down or building up of fat below the surface of the skin, resulting in lumps or small dents in the skin surface which may be caused by repeated injections of insulin in the same spot), lipoatrophy (wasting of fat under the skin which can be unsightly), and lipohypertrophy (buildup of fat under the skin which can slow the absorption of insulin) that may result in ineffective management of the residents' diabetes mellitus (DM - high blood sugar). Findings: During a review of Resident 99's admission Record, the admission Record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete the smoking risk assessment (smoking safety evaluation, an assessment that helps determine a resident's ability to smoke safely, whether independently or with supervision, and to identify potential fire hazards) for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 133). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 133's safety, causing a smoking related injury and fire hazard in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 133's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 4/28/2025 with diagnoses that included encephalopathy (a condition that causes dysfunction to the brain, affecting its structure or function), type 2 diabetes (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), need for assistance with personal care, hypertension (high blood pressure), and heart failure (condition in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood and oxygen). During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of four (4) medication carts was locked and secured when it was unattended in the hallway. This deficient practice had the potential for unauthorized access to medications, drug diversion, and/or drug pilferage. Findings: During an observation on 7/1/2025 at 8:25 AM, the licensed vocational nurse (LVN 2) was at the doorway of Resident 96's room preparing medication for administration. During an observation on 7/1/2025 at 8:30 AM, LVN 2 walked into Resident 96's room and left the medication cart unlocked in the hallway. During an observation and concurrent interview on 7/1/2025 at 8:34 AM, LVN 2 exited Resident 96's room and acknowledged that she did not lock the medication cart. During a review of the facility's Policy and Procedures (P&P), Storage of Medication (dated 3/1/2025), the P&P indicated that . Compartments . containing drugs and biologicals are locked when not in use. Unlocked medication carts are not left unattended .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1.The nursing staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 [LVN 3] and Licensed Vocational Nurse 4 [LVN 4]) followed its enhanced barriers precautions (EBP, an infection prevention protocol to reduce the spread of certain drug-resistant bacteria, particularly in nursing homes) policy during the medication administration observation for two (2) of six sampled residents (Resident 36 and 23). 2. One of six residents (Resident 119) was provided with a proper identifier for enhanced barrier precautions. These deficient practices had potential to cause cross contamination, spreading the infection among residents, visitors and staff. Findings: 1. During a medication administration (med pass) observation on 7/01/2025 at 9:01 AM, on the wall behind Resident 36's bed, there was a sign indicating enhanced barrier precautions. LVN 3 was observed performing hand hygiene prior to proceeding to measure Resident 36's blood pressure and heart rate at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate in accordance with accepted professional standard and practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1's discharge plan was reflected in Resident 1 ' s medical record. This deficient practice resulted in incomplete and inaccurate record for Resident 1 ' s discharge plan and goals. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteoarthritis (progressive disorder of the joints, caused by a gradual loss of cartilage) and abnormities of gait and mobility. During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/15/24 indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact. Resident 1 moderate assistance (helper does less than half the effort) with toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, lower body dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to implement its abuse policy and procedures when the facility failed to report to the Survey State Agency (SSA) an injury of unknown origin with 24 hours for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). On 8/16/2024 at 12:22 pm, Resident 1 was found on the floor with discoloration to the left of his face and a 0.5-centimeter (cm-unit of measurement) scratch to the right side of the nose. On 8/20/2024, the hemodialysis (a medical procedure to remove fluid and waste products from the blood) center reported to Resident 1's physician that the resident had bruising and swelling to the left side of the face. The physician ordered for Resident to be transferred to a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) for further evaluation and management. The facility never reported Resident's 1 injuries to the SSA. This deficient practice resulted in delayed investigation of Resident 1's injuries by the SSA. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of Coronavirus – 19 (COVID-19, COVID, a virus that causes respiratory illness that can spread from person to person) as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure that two of the four sampled residents (Residents 1 and 3) were wearing a mask while interacting with other residents in the hallway and at the nurses station. 2. Failing to ensure that Registered Nurse (RN) 1 were wearing N95 respirators (is a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) they were fit tested for (RN 1). These deficient practices had the potential to place both residents and staff at a risk for infection to COVID-19. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of an abuse in accordance with state and federal law for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). This resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the State Agency (SA) to ensure the safety of the residents and had the potential to result in unidentified abuse in the facility as well as failure to protect residents from any possible abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (condition in which your blood does not get enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), congestive heart failure (CHF-a chronic condition in which the heart does not pump blood as well as it should) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquid). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address the resident's pain level before, during, and after Restorative Nursing Assistant application (RNA - a Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] who helped patient's regain physical and cognitive ability after an injury or illness) for three of four sampled residents (Resident 52, Resident 92, and Resident 129). This deficient practice had the potential for residents to experience pain when not properly assessed. Findings: a. A review of Resident 52's admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted the resident on 10/31/2018 and re-admitted the resident on 4/27/2024, with diagnoses including polyarthritis (a condition that causes inflammation, pain, and stiffness in five or more joints at the same time), neuralgia (severe, sharp, and often shock-like pain that follows the path of a nerve) and need for assistance with personal care. A review of the Physician's Order dated 7/13/2023, indicated for Resident 52 to receive RNA for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by not labeling: -one plastic container of Aji- Mirin Sweet Cooking [NAME] seasoning with open and use by dates. -one plastic bag of carrots with open and use by dates. -one plastic bag of ginger with open and use by dates. -one plastic bag of Dried [NAME] with open and use by dates. -one plastic container of Salted Shrimp with no open and used by dates. In addition, the facility failed to discard several items by the use by date. These deficient practices had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/17/2024 at 8:03 A.M., the Dietary Assistant (DA) observed one plastic container of Aji-Mirin Sweet Cooking [NAME] seasoning, one bag of carrots, one plastic container of Salted Shrimp, one plastic bag of ginger, and one plastic bag of Dried [NAME] with no open or use by dates. There was one bottle of [NAME] vinegar with an open date of 2/7/2024 and a use by date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced residents' dignity and respect for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident 87 and 93), by standing over the residents while assisting them during a meal. These deficient practices had the potential to affect residents' sense of self-worth, self-esteem, and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: a. A review of Resident 87's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/6/2020, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorders the slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood, ranging from extreme high manic episodes to low depression episodes), and essential hypertension (a condition in which the blood vessels have persistently raised pressure). A review of Resident 87's History and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the resident's advance directive (a written instruction, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is unable to make decisions for themselves) was in the resident's medical chart and the Advance Directive Acknowledgement form was completed thoroughly for two of seven sampled residents (Residents 92 and Resident 140). These deficient practices had the potential for the facility to not honor the residents' medical decisions regarding end-of-life treatment. Findings: A review of Resident 92's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/2/2024, with diagnoses including abnormalities in gait and mobility (a change to your walking pattern), osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time), and fibromyalgia (a disorder characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain accompanied by fatigue, sleep, memory, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report the following incidents to the State Survey Agency (SSA, the Bureau of Health Facility Licensing) within the appropriate timeframe for two of six sampled residents (Resident 13 and Resident 195) as evidenced by: -For Resident 13, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin (an injury that the source was not observed by any person or could not be explained by the resident). -For Resident 195, the facility failed to report a fall with injury. These deficient practices resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) to ensure Resident 13's injury of unknown origin and Resident 195's fall with injury were investigated. Findings: a. A review of Resident 13's admission Record (face sheet) indicated the facility readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for hospice (a specialized type of care that provides physical comfort and emotional, social, and spiritual support for people nearing the end of life) one of six sampled residents (Resident 123). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 123 to not be provided with necessary and personalized care. Findings: A review of Resident 123's admission Record indicated the facility readmitted the resident on 5/31/2024 with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of the stomach (cancer [a disease in which abnormal cells divide uncontrollably and destroy body tissue] of the stomach), encounter for palliative care (specialized medical care for people living with a serious illness, such as cancer or heart failure [occurs when the heart muscle doesn't pump blood as well as it should]), severe protein-calorie malnutrition (a nutritional status in which reduced availability of nutrients leads to changes in body composition and function), and sepsis (a serious condition in which the body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety measures were assessed and implemented for one of six sampled residents (Resident 134) by failing to initiate a smoking risk assessment when the facility was aware the resident was a smoker. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 134 to be at risk for injury or burns without a proper assessment. Findings: A review of Resident 134's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 5/16/2024, with diagnoses including abnormalities of gait and mobility (a change to your walking pattern), hypertension (high blood pressure) and diabetes mellitus (chronic metabolic disease that occurs when the body did not produce enough insulin or cannot use insulin properly). A review of Resident 134's admission Nursing Risks assessment dated [DATE], indicated the resident did not smoke, which did not prompt the document to allow safety measures to be reviewed and implemented. A review of Resident 134's History…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided care and nutrition consistent with their weight loss assessment and the Registered Dietitian's (RD) recommendations for one of four sampled residents (Residents 133). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident's weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 133's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 2/7/2024 and readmitted him on 4/7/2024 with diagnoses including end stage of renal disease (final, permanent stage of chronic kidney disease, where kidney function declined to the point that the kidneys can no longer function on their own), dependence on renal dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) and depression (an illness characterized by persistent sadness and a loss of interest in activities, accompanied by an inability to carry out daily activities). A review of Resident 133's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a new tube feeding (a way to provide nutrition when you cannot eat or drink safely by mouth, delivered through a gastric tube [G-tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach]) set was used when starting a new tube feeding bottle for one of six sampled residents (Resident 124). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 124 to experience infection control issues and experience tube feeding intolerance symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and abdominal discomfort. Findings: A review of Resident 124's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/17/2024 with diagnoses that included Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, gastrostomy (G-Tube, a tube inserted through the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach), dysphagia (difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to accommodate resident needs for two of two sampled residents (Resident 28 and 99). This deficient practice had the potential for the residents to not receive timely and efficient care and needed services. Findings: a. A review of the Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA) Assignments for 5/19/2024, indicated that on 5/19/2024, eight CNAs were working during the 11 PM-7 AM shift attending 147 residents. On 5/19/2024, one CNA was no call, no show and was not replaced. Her assignment was split between eight working CNAs during the 11 PM-7 AM shift, each CNA was assigned to 17-19 residents. A review of Resident 99's admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted the resident on 1/31/2024 with diagnoses that included need for assistance with personal care, severe morbid obesity (a disorder that involves having too much body fat, which increases the risk of health problems), hypertension (high blood pressure), and chronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-20 · tag F0848 — isolatedProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include verbiage in the Arbitration Agreement (a contractual agreement to settle disputes out of court using a neutral third party called an arbitrator) that allowed residents the freedom to choose a venue to meet. This deficient practice had the potential for residents who have entered into a binding arbitration agreement to have a say in a convenient meeting place for both parties. Findings: A review of the facility's undated Arbitration Agreement form, indicated there were no residents who entered into a binding arbitration agreement for selection of a venue of choice that was convenient. During an interview on 6/20/2024 at 11:10 AM, the Admissions Coordinator (AC) stated the form did not indicate where the residents would meet. The AC stated having that verbiage would be a good thing to add so the residents who have entered into a binding arbitration agreement would have a say in where the meeting spot would be. During an interview on 6/20/2024 at 11:57 AM, the Business Office Manager (BOM) stated the form did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to re-admit one of one sampled resident (Resident 1). Resident 1 who was ready to be discharged from the general acute hospital (GACH 2) on 1/19/24, the facility refused to re-admit Resident 1. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 not given his right to return to the facility. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 9/22/23 with diagnoses including morbid obesity (more than 80 to 100 pounds [lbs., unit of measurement] of their ideal body weight) and chronic obstructive respiratory disease (COPD, group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing related problems). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool) dated 9/25/23, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact (mental process involved in knowing, learning, and understanding). Resident 1 needed two-person physical assistance with eating, personal hygiene and three-person physical assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and bathing. During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 72 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]) met the required space at least 80 square feet for each resident. This failure had the potential to affect the delivery of care, safety, and privacy of the residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/3/2025 at 9:25 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], Maintenance supervisor (MS) measured the room. The MS stated the room measured 10'8.5 x 19'9 = 213.69 sq. ft. The room was clean and free from clutter and obstruction. During an interview on 7/3/25 at 9:26 AM with Certified Nurse Assistant 5 (CNA 5) , CNA 5 stated the room feels regular. The room is kept low clutter and easily accessible. During a review of the Client Accommodations Analysis dated 7/3/2025, the Client Accommodations Analysis indicated the room measurements for room [ROOM NUMBER] was 10'8.5 x 19'9 = 213.69 sq. ft., with three beds The square footage requirements for a three-bed capacity room must be at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure space requirements of 80 square feet for each resident were met for one of 87 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER]). This deficient practice resulted in inadequate space to provide safe nursing care and privacy. Findings: During multiple room observation conducted in room [ROOM NUMBER], from 6/17/2024 to 6/20/2024, between the hours of 7:30 AM to 4 PM, observations of nursing staff showed adequate space to provide care to the residents, and each resident was provided privacy curtains for privacy. There were no concerns observed related to space or to the safe provisions of care to the residents residing in the room. A review of the Room Waiver letter dated 6/18/2024, from the Administrator, indicated the room waiver would not adversely affect the health and safety of the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER]. A review of the Client Accommodations Analysis dated 6/20/2024, indicated the following rooms with their corresponding measurements:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOHN, BARRY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/1991 |
| ZEMEL, ELLIOT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/24/2025 |
| CONSTANTINO, MARIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/03/2025 |
| GONZALEZ, MARIO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/07/2004 |
| HERNANDEZ, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/16/2024 |
| MORALES, ISAURO | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/16/2024 |
| PAK, SUNNY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/20/2023 |
| SCHMUKLER, YEHUDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/02/2012 |
| SOLOMON, ILANA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/20/2025 |
| TADEO, MARISELA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/02/2009 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $426K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 056244. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.