No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hollenbeck Palms

573 S. Boyle Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90033 · Non profit - Corporation · 106 certified beds · (213) 263-6195 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (213) 263-6195 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605, F0607) — most recent Dec 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
2417 Whittier Blvd · (323) 881-1641 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1625 E 4th St · (323) 859-2823 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
557 S Clarence St · (323) 425-5961 · Call to confirm hours
Park
415 S St Louis St · (323) 261-0113 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
430 S St Louis St · (323) 268-2351

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased36.4%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight13.0%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.0%1.2%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained2.4%0.4%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.8%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.0%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.9%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.8%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.4%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.5%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.8%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.622.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.491.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
37.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 37.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.7%CMS range 46.2–69.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 6.9–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge37.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 3.1–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.77
RN hours/ resident / day
0.86
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.59
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.53
RN hoursweekends
28.1%
Total nursing turnover
30.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 106 beds and averages 53.7 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.96 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.75 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-12)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-25)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision (the act of overseeing, managing, or directing a person, group, or process to ensure tasks are completed correctly and safely) or touching assistance (helper provides verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or contact guard assistance [when a caregiver keeps one or two hands on the patient's body at all times to steady the patient's balance) as indicated in the Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool) for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a prior history of falls. As a result, on 5/21/2026, when Resident 1 ambulated to the activity room with a four-wheeled walker (a mobility aid designed to roll alongside with a patient without the need to lift it) without assistance or supervision, Resident 1's four-wheeled walker caught on the metal floor transition strip (a piece of trim used to bridge the gap where two different types of flooring meet) at the entrance to the activity room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent multiple fall (unintentional descent that results in a coming to a rest on the floor, on or against another surface, on another person, or an object) of one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) by: 1. Failing to develop and implement a fall care plan (a document that outlines the facility's plan to provide personalized care to a resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs) for Resident 1's actual fall on 6/30/2024, 7/24/2024, and 8/2/2024 per facility policy. 2. Failing to ensure that care plan for Impaired cognition and High risk for falls dated 7/8/2024 and 7/30/2024 included interventions unique (resident specific) to Resident 1's needs. 3. Failing to ensure CNA 1 did not leave Resident 1 sitting in the wheelchair in the hallway unsupervised by facility staff on 8/2/2024 that led to the resident sliding down from the wheelchair and falling to the floor.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a resident centered fall care plan (document that outlines the facility's plan to provide personalized care to a resident based on the resident's needs) for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1), who had a prior history of falls. This deficient practice resulted to Resident 1 falling on the floor and transfer to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 5/21/2026 and undergoing a left knee open reduction internal fixation (ORIF, a major surgery used to repair severe bone fractures that cannot be properly healed with a simple cast or splint) on 5/26/2026. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 2/12/2019, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 2/12/2019 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ataxia (loss of muscle control), difficulty in walking, and repeated falls. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician that a medication was not given as ordered for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) as indicated in the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P), titled Medication and Treatment Administration Records, when:Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) did not notify the physician when bisoprolol fumarate (medication used to treat hypertension [high blood pressure -BP]) was not given on 10/18/2025 at 8 PM.RN 1 did not notify the physician of Resident 1's low blood pressure and heart rate (HR) readings on 10/18/2025 at 7:03 PM. This deficient practice had the potential to result in delays in the necessary care and treatment of Resident 1, which could affect the resident's overall wellbeing.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted Resident 1 on 8/24/2023 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to chronic congestive heart failure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility (Facility 1) failed to clarify and continue the therapeutic diet (a specially prescribed meal plan that modifies normal eating to treat a medical condition, managing nutrients, calories, textures, or allergies for health improvement, often prescribed by doctors and planned by dietitians for things like diabetes, heart disease, kidney issues, or post-surgery recovery) for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents (Resident 1) upon admission to the facility on 9/19/2025. This failure resulted in Resident 1 receiving the incorrect diet for three (3) days (9/19/2025 to 9/23/2025) upon admission to the facility.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic (long-term) congestive heart failure (a condition where the heart muscles become too weak or stiff to pump blood efficiently causing fluid to back up in the lungs and body) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Low Air Loss mattress (LAL mattress, designed to prevent and treat pressure ulcer [localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue caused by prolonged pressure]) was set at the correct setting for two (2) of four (4) sampled residents (Residents 9 and 28) under pressure ulcer care area. This failure had the potential to result in the deterioration of Resident 9's pressure ulcer and development of Resident 28's pressure ulcer. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 9's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 9 on 8/31/2025. Resident 9's diagnoses included muscle weakness, dementia (progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), abnormal posture, and full incontinence of feces. During a review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and screening tool), dated 11/17/2025, the MDS indicated the resident was severely impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper food handling and the food service area was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure:1. One dented saltshaker was free of food residue and was not crusted.2. One pepper shaker did not contain red food residue and had a dirty label.3. 3 burgundy plate covers were not peeling, chipped, and scratched. 4. 27 black food trays were not peeling and chipped. These deficient practices have the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents, which could place the residents at risk for developing foodborne illness ([food poisoning] with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever) and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization.Findings: During an observation in the kitchen at 8:07 AM, the saltshaker was observed to be dented and dirty with crusted food residue. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of four (4) sampled residents (Residents 65 and 6) under the environment care area, had their call light within reach in accordance with the care plan. This failure had the potential to put Residents 65 and 6 at risk for experiencing a delay in receiving assistance from facility staff which could lead to a fall or accident.1. During a review of Resident 65's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (when the heart muscle thickens abnormally making it hard for it to pump blood out to the body, essentially blocking the outflow) and generalized muscle weakness (a widespread lack of strength affecting many muscles throughout the body).During a review of Resident 65'S Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 12/11/2025, the MDS indicated the resident had intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote respect and dignity for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Residents 19) under the dignity care area by failing to ensure that Resident 19 was free from visible food stains on her clothing and dry, crusted discharge on her left eye. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact Resident 19's self-esteem and psychosocial well-being (state of mental, emotional, and social health of an individual). Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 19 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 19's diagnoses included depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), difficulty in walking, and osteoarthritis (the cartilage within a joint begins to break down and the underlying bone begins to change causing reduced function and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 17) under unnecessary medication care area was free from unnecessary use of psychotropic drug (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) by failing to ensure Resident 17's hours of sleep was monitored for the use of Trazodone (a medicine used to improve mood, energy, and focus), in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 17 at risk for significant adverse consequences (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) from the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which could result to impairment or decline in the resident's mental, physical condition, functional, and psychosocial status. Findings: During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 17 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan (a formal process that correctly identifies existing needs and recognizes a resident's potential needs or risks to achieve healthcare outcomes) for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 17) under care planning care area to manage the resident's behavioral problems with manifestations of striking at staff and others, crying, and danger to self and others.This deficient practice had the potential to prevent Resident 17 from receiving care that addressed the resident's specific needs, which could negatively affect the residents' overall wellbeing.Findings:During a review of Resident 17's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 17 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnosis included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming services for one (1) of seven (7) sampled residents (Resident 48) under activities of daily living (ADLs- are activities related to personal care that include bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating) care area, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Grooming and Personal Hygiene . This deficient practice resulted in Resident 48's unkempt and dirty fingernails potentially leading to skin injury, infection, and scarring.Findings: During a review of Resident 48's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 48 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which dementia (progressive brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), muscle weakness, depression (severe feelings of sadness and hopelessness). During a review of Resident 48's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to measure the external catheter length (insertion site to hub) for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC, a thin, flexible tube inserted into a small arm vein and guided to a large central vein near the heart) line for one of 28 sampled residents (Resident 24), in accordance with Facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled PICC Dressing Change. This failure had the potential to put Resident 28 at risk for PICC line dislodgement (the act of being forced or moved from a secure, fixed) and developing complications like thrombosis (the formation of a blood clot [clump of blood] inside a blood vessel [vein or artery] that blocks or slows blood flow), and infection (when harmful germs invade the body).Findings: During a review of Resident 24's admission Record, it indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], admitting diagnoses of malnutrition, weight loss and encounter for adjustment and management of vascular access…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff donned (put on) proper personal protective equipment (PPE; clothing and equipment that is worn or used to protect against hazardous substances and/or environments) prior to entering a contact isolation (a transmission based precaution used to stop germs from spreading through direct touch with a resident or indirect touch with contaminated objects in their environment) room for two (2) of nine (9) sampled residents (Residents 28 and 45) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) This failure had the potential to result in the spread of infection to other residents in the facility.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 28's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral ischemia (when blood flow to the brain is reduced, cutting off oxygen and nutrients, which can damage or kill brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe infection control measures as indicated on the facility policy when facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, protective clothing such as gown, gloves, goggles, mask) before administering medication to Resident 35 via gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a surgically inserted tube that provides a way to deliver nutrition, fluids, and medications directly to the stomach) on 10/24/2024. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 35 developing an infection and spread of infection among staff and residents. 2. Ensure the Legionella (a type of bacteria spread through small droplets of water that can cause legionellosis [Legionnaires' Disease, a serious and potentially deadly lung infection]) Water Management Program policy and procedure was implemented when Facility lost water supply due to water main break outside the facility on 10/23/2024. This deficient practice had the potential to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure three of six sampled resident's (Resident 37, 6, and 10) environment was free from accidental hazards (a source of danger that has the potential to cause harm) when hot water temperatures inside the resident's bathrooms were measured to be above 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F- unit of measurement for temperature). This deficient practice placed Residents 37, 6 and 10 at risk for scalding (very hot) and burns (injury related to exposure to heat or flame) related to hot water temperatures. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 37's admission record, the admission record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of aphasia (language disorder that makes it difficult to communicate with others) following cerebral infarction (a serious condition that occurs when an area of the brain tissue dies due to a lack of blood flow), difficulty in walking, hemiplegia (total or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross reference: F755 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its medication error rate was less than five (5) percent (%). Nine (9) medication errors out of 27 total opportunities for error, to yield an overall medication error rate of 33.3 % for one (1) of five (5) residents observed for medication administration (Residents 35). Licensed Vocational Nurse 1 (LVN 1) failed to administer Resident 35's medications within 60 minutes of scheduled time of 8 AM on 10/24/2024. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 35 to experience medication adverse effects (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a medication may have) and the potential to result in Resident 35'ss health and well-being to be negatively impacted. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 35 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 35's diagnoses included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food were handled, prepared, and stored in a manner that prevents foodborne illness (food poisoning) for 56 of 56 residents receiving food from the facility's kitchen, by failing to ensure: 1. Food items stored in the kitchen refrigerators and freezer (thirty-eight [38] food items), walk-in freezer (eleven [11] food items), dry storage area 1 (where breads and vegetables are stored) (three [3] food items) were labeled with open date and/or use by date (last date recommended for use of the product while at peak quality), and/or expiration date and sealed after opening. 2. Two (2) dented canned products were discarded and one (1) cracked and leaking peanut butter jar was discarded from the dry storage area 2 (where canned products, sugars and jars are stored). In addition, the facility failed to ensure the container with blue lid in the dry storage area 2 was free of dirt, dust, and dead fly. 3. Expired food products were removed and discarded. 4. Temperature logs for the kitchen refrigerators and dry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose garbage (mostly decomposable food waste or yard waste) and keep 11 of 11 garbage bin/plastic dumpster/refuse (dry material such as glass, paper, cloth, or wood that does not readily decompose) containers covered and/or not overfilled with trash as indicated on the facility policy. These deficient practices had the potential to attract vermin (animals that are believed to be harmful, carry diseases such as rodents, parasitic worms, or insects), pests (any living thing that has a negative effect on humans), and wildlife (undomesticated animal species) that could potentially infiltrate the facility, affect the resident care areas and pose a disease threat to the residents and staff of the facility. Findings: During an observation of the first-floor hallway of the kitchen on 10/22/2024 at 7:59 AM, a garbage bin without a cover was seen next to a metal cart with a plate, two used uncovered pitchers, a washcloth, roll of unused trash bags, and two open boxes of plastic aprons. There was also a rolling cart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced a resident's dignity and respect for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) by failing to ensure facility staff did not stand above Resident 1's eye level while assisting the resident to eat. This deficient practice had the potential to affect Resident 1's self-esteem and self-worth and violates Resident 1's right to be treated with dignity. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted the resident on 6/30/2016 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing), polyosteoarthritis (arthritis- inflammation and stiffness of the joints, affects five or more joints at the same time), major depressive disorder (a mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a copy of the advance directive (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them) was readily available in the residents' medical chart for two of 10 sampled residents (Residents 6 and 108) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Advance Directives. This failure had the potential to result in nursing staff not knowing if Residents 6 and 108 had specific resident wishes to follow in case of an emergency. Findings: During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction (a serious condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked, causing brain tissue to die), epilepsy (a sudden, abnormal burst of electrical activity in the brain that causes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled resident (Resident 19) was free from physical restraints (any manual method, physical or mechanical device, equipment, or material that is attached or adjacent to the resident's body; cannot be removed easily by the resident; and restricts the resident's freedom of movement or normal access to his/her body) when the facility failed to conduct an assessment for the use of geriatric chair (Geri chair, a large, padded, and mobile reclining chair that prevents a resident from rising). This deficient practice had the potential to result in limiting Resident 19's mobility and cause injury. This also had the potential for Resident 19 not to be treated with respect and dignity with the use of restraints. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 19 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 19's diagnoses included dementia (a progressive state of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinent care and keep the resident free of foul odors to one of ?? sampled residents (Resident 108) who is dependent (helper does all the effort to complete an activity) on assistant from staff for personal, toileting hygiene, and showers. These deficient practices resulted in the residents feeling frustrated and embarrassed, due to lack of or delay in receiving sufficient services to maintain personal hygiene and incontinent care and had the potential to lead to skin breakdown, social isolation and to negatively impact Resident 108's self-esteem. Findings: During a review of Resident 108's admission record, the admission record indicated the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses cellulitis of left lower limb (a superficial infection of the skin), obesity (abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that presents a risk to health), personal history of urinary tract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two sampled residents (Resident 51) who was on continuous oxygen (colorless, odorless, and tasteless gas) therapy received oxygen as ordered in accordance with the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications associated with oxygen therapy and could result in the resident not receiving proper treatment. Findings: During a review of Resident 51's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 51 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 51's diagnoses included shortness of breath, dependence on supplemental oxygen, and anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells). During a review of Resident 51's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 9/19/2024, the MDS indicated Resident 51's cognitive (ability to think and reason) skills for daily decision making was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross reference: F759 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of five sampled residents (Resident 35) in accordance with the facility policy by failing to administer Resident 35's 8 AM due medications on 10/24/2024 as indicated on the physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 35 to experience tachycardia (a fast heartbeat of more than 100 times per minute), high blood pressure (when your blood pressure is consistently higher than normal), and decline in overall health status. Findings: During a review of Resident 35's admission Record, indicated Resident 35 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 35's diagnoses included hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (a medical condition that causes weakness or an inability to move on one side of the body) affecting left side, and gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 35) was free from significant medication error (the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order; manufacturer's specifications [not recommendations] regarding the preparation and administration of the medication or biological; or accepted professional standards and principles which apply to professionals providing services) by administering Amlodipine (a medication used to treat high blood pressure), Carvedilol (a medication that slows down the heart rate making it easier for the heart to pump blood around the body) and Losartan (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) to Resident 35 outside of physician ordered parameters. This deficient practice increased the risk for Resident 35 to may have experience serious medical complications such as bradycardia (a condition where the heart beats…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from an unnecessary psychotropic drug (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) in accordance with the facility policy and procedure by failing to ensure Resident 1 had a specific target behavior for the use of Lorazepam ( medication used to treat anxiety [persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities]). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for significant adverse (harmful) consequences from the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which could result to impairment or decline in the residents' mental, physical condition, functional, and psychosocial status. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated an initial admission to the facility on 4/6/2024, and readmission on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included anxiety disorder, dementia (a brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from physical restraints (any manual method, physical or mechanical device, equipment, or material that is attached or adjacent to the resident's body; cannot be removed easily by the resident; and restricts the resident's freedom of movement or normal access to his/her body) by failing to conduct an assessment for the use of seatbelt (an arrangement of straps designed to hold a person steady in a seat). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's physical and psychological wellbeing and quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated an initial admission to the facility on 4/6/2024, and readmission on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), dementia (a brain disorder that results in memory loss,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident-centered fall care plan (a document that outlines the facility's plan to provide personalized care to a resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) per facility policy. This deficient practice had a potential for Resident 1's increased risk for further falls. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated an initial admission to the facility on 4/6/2024, and readmission on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities), dementia (a brain disorder that results in memory loss, poor judgment, and confusion), and repeated falls. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care planning screening tool), dated 7/15/2024, the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Residents 19 and 31) had their low air loss (LAL, operates using a blower based pump that is designed to circulate a constant flow of air through the mattress, commonly used to heal pressure ulcers [wound that occurs as a result of prolonged pressure on a specific area of the body]) mattresses set according to the resident's in accordance to the manual for Med-Aire Essential 8-inch Alternating Pressure and Low Air Loss Mattress System. 1. Resident 19, who weighed 82 pounds (lbs.), was observed with the LAL mattress set at 440 lbs. 2. Resident 31, who weighed 137 lbs., was observed with LAL mattress set at the highest setting at 350 lbs. This deficient practice placed Resident 19 at risk for development of new pressure ulcer and placed Resident 31 at risk for progression of pressure ulcer. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 19's admission Record, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and as indicated in the facility policy by failing to: 1) Label multiple food items in the kitchen refrigerator and dry food storage with the opened and prepared date, food item names, and received date and expiration date. 2) Discard expired food. 3) Follow infection control measures in the kitchen when an empty water bottle and soda can were found on the storage rack in the dry storage room. These deficient practices have a potential to contaminate food items and can place the residents at risk for infection. These deficient practices have the potential to result in food borne illnesses (any sickness that is caused by the consumption of foods or beverages that are contaminated with certain infectious or noninfectious agents) to the residents. Findings: 1. During an observation in the kitchen on 11/17/23 at 6 p.m., two (2) large plastic containers of food items without labels indicating the date when food was prepared were found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-19 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 19 and 29) under hospice care (provides medical services, emotional support, and spiritual resources for people who are in the last stages of a terminal illness) services had coordinated care between the facility and the hospice agency. Resident 19 did not have a certification of illness documented in the active records to receive hospice services. This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 19 and 29 to not receive the appropriate care and/or services from the facility and the hospice agency. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 19's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (long term and often gradual decrease in the ability to think and remember severe enough to affect a resident's daily functioning) and adult failure to thrive (unintentional weight loss, a decline in functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection prevention control practices (a set of practices that prevent or stop the spread of infections and or diseases in the healthcare setting) were followed in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure when: 1. Resident 15's double lumen (a small soft tubing) peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, used to give medications, fluid and nutrition directly to the vein near the heart) access dressing was not changed every seven (7) days as indicated on the PICC dressing change policy. 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) failed to practice hand hygiene after administering: a. Resident 50's gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) medication and nasal spray b. Resident 30's G-tube medication and eye drops c. Resident 26's oral medications and eye drops 3. A soiled diaper was left on top of the toilet tank of Resident 5 and Resident 37's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST, a portable medical order form that records patients' treatment wishes so that emergency personnel know what treatments the resident wants in the event of a medical emergency, taking the patient's current medical condition into consideration) coincides with the advance directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment which were made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 37) when the POLST indicating Do not Resuscitate (DNR, medical order that directs healthcare providers not to administer CPR in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest) was placed in the residents chart without the signature of the attending physician. This deficient practice had the potential to cause conflict in carrying out Resident 37's wishes for medical treatment and resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the licensed nursing staff failed to notify the physician when there was a change in condition for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 17) in accordance with the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed provision of necessary care and services. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated Resident 17 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with cerebral ischemia (a condition in which a blockage in an artery restricts the delivery of oxygen-rich blood to the brain resulting in damage to brain tissue.), dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), candidiasis (skin infection may cause rashes, scaling, itching, and swelling) of skin and nail. A review of the History and Physical report completed on 2/20/23, indicated Resident 17 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to implement their Abuse (the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish) Prevention, management, and Reporting Policies by not reporting and investigating an injury of unknown origin that may be a result abuse or neglect (the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress) for one out of 15 residents (Resident 16). This deficiency has resulted a delay of the delivery of care to Resident 16 who had suffered a fracture (a partial or complete break in the bone) of left shoulder. Findings: a. A review of Resident 16's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 16's diagnoses included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 17) was provided care and services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene in accordance with the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a negative impact on Resident 17's quality of life and self-esteem. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated Resident 17 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with Cerebral ischemia (Cerebral ischemia- a condition in which a blockage in an artery restricts the delivery of oxygen-rich blood to the brain resulting in damage to brain tissue.), dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), Candidiasis (skin infection may cause rashes, scaling, itching, and swelling) of skin and nail. A review of Resident 17's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a comprehensive standardized assessment and screening…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe provision of pharmaceutical services when one (1) of two (2) medication carts was left unlocked before licensed vocational nurse (LVN) entered a resident's room to administer medications. This deficient practice had the potential for non-authorized staff or residents to access the medication cart, which can result to drug diversion (prescription medications are obtained and or used illegally by healthcare providers) or may cause serious injury/harm in the event that the medications are ingested by the residents. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 11/19/23 at 4:13 p.m., the LVN 3 forgot to lock the medication cart before going to Resident 15's room to administer resident's medications. Five (5) Residents were observed sitting on a wheelchair, across the room in the hallway, where the medication cart was located. During an interview on 11/19/23 at 4:20 p.m., LVN 3 verified she forgot to lock the medication cart and stated the cart always had to be locked because the residents might…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-10-25 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy by failing to: 1. Post the nurse staffing information in a prominent location (accessible to residents and visitors). 2. Ensure the Daily Report of Nursing Staff (nurse staffing information) posted on 10/22/24 and 10/23/24 was accurate to reflect the correct date and total number of projected hours and the actual hours of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. This deficient practice had the potential to inaccurately reflect the actual nurses providing direct care to the residents. Findings: During initial observation of the facilities entrance and lobby on 10/22/2024 at 8:06 AM, the Nurse Staffing Information was not posted in a prominent location (accessible to residents and visitors). Observed Daily Report of Nursing Staff dated 10/20/2024 posted at information board located at nursing station [NAME] wing. Nursing station East wing did not have Daily Report of Nursing Staff posted. During a follow up observation on 10/22/2024 at 4:07 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
JOHNSTON, CAROLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2013
KIRCHHOFF, KATHERINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
KUMAGAI, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
ONISHI, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
ROSENBLOOM, LINDAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
BELLE HOME CARE INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/20/2025
WIPFLI LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
KANEGAE, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/02/2009
RAMIREZ, IVANIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/04/2021
SHOCKLEY, MORRISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/07/2012
YOUNG, JOHNNYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/17/1987

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$21.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 27%Medicare 6%Other / private 66%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$909per resident / day
operating cost
$27,642per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$748per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055115. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next