Los Angeles Comm Hospital

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 39 beds and averages 38.4 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.55 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.85 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.68 to 1.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control and Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP- an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs] in nursing homes) protocols for two of six residents (Resident 23 and Resident 2), by not wearing the required personal protective equipment (PPE- clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) during suctioning and not maintaining proper infection control practices during wound care.These deficient practices placed Residents 23 and 2 and other residents at increased risk for infection.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/30/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 2's diagnoses included a pressure injury (localized damage to the skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of eight sampled residents (Resident 13 and Resident 24) had informed consent prior to the placement of hand and wrist restraints. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 13 and Resident 24 being placed in restraints without consent from their responsible party. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 13's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 13's electronic medical records, the electronic medical records indicated Resident 13's diagnoses included quadriplegia (paralysis from the neck down, including legs, and arms, usually due to a spinal cord injury) and chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body). During a review of Resident 13's History and Physical (H&P), dated 3/4/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 13 was unable to convey any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) orders for lorazepam (Ativan, a medication to treat anxiety [feeling of unease]), did not exceed a 14-day administration period for two of 12 sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 19). This deficient practice had the potential to result in prolonged administration of lorazepam placing the resident at risk for serious complications such as dependence on the medication, sedation, and withdrawal from prolonged use (the physical and mental symptoms that a person has when they suddenly stop or cut back the use of an addictive substance).Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/30/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 2's diagnoses included anxiety disorder (excessive fear of or apprehension about real or perceived threats, leading to altered behavior and often to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for three of 12 sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 7, and Resident 14). This deficient practice placed Residents 2, 7, and 14 at risk of not receiving resident-centered interventions.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/30/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 2's diagnoses included a pressure injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) and an open wound. During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 11/26/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 2 had moderately impaired cognition (problems with a person's ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions). The MDS indicated Resident 2 required substantial to maximal assistance from staff to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff documented and properly assessed bilateral hand edema (swelling caused by an abnormal accumulation of excess fluid trapped in the body's tissues) and documented the scab above a resident's lip for two resident of eight sampled residents (Resident 7 and 14).These deficient practices delayed care for Resident 7 and 14 and placed the residents at risk for complications due to not receiving the necessary care.Findings:a. During an observation on 2/2/2026 at 10:18 a.m. in Resident 7's room, observed Resident 7 lying in bed. Resident 7 had bilateral hand edema. During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 7's electronic medical record, the electronic medical record indicated Resident 7 had diagnoses that included respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Foley catheter (a flexible indwelling tube inserted through the urethra [a hollow tube that lets urine leave the body] into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) drained properly into the collection bag preventing the backflow of urine (when urine flows backward from the bladder to one or both ureters and sometimes to the kidneys) for one of two residents (Resident 20).This deficient practice placed Resident 20 at an increased risk for potential infection, discomfort, obstruction, and decline in health status.Findings:During a review of Resident 20's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 20's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), enlarged prostate (increased in the size of the prostate [a small gland in the male reproductive system]), and seizures (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pulse oximetry (device called placed on a finger or earlobe used to measure the oxygen level of the blood) was applied in order to effectively monitor the oxygen saturation level ([O2 sat], a measurement of how much oxygen the blood is carrying as a percentage) for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 24) receiving respiratory services (treatment, management and care of the patient's breathing). This deficient practice placed Resident 24 at high risk of failing to detect hypoxemia (low blood oxygen), and delayed treatment that can rapidly progress to life-threatening complications. Findings: During observations on 2/2/2026 at 10:22 a.m., and 2/4/2026 at 3:40 p.m., in Resident 24's room, observed Resident 24 was not wearing a pulse oximetry probe. The cord of the pulse oximetry was hanging off the bed. During an observation on 2/5/2026 at 11:00 a.m. in Resident 24's room, observed Resident 24 was not wearing a pulse oximetry…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure orders for hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 (brand name Norco, an opioid medication used to reduce moderate to severe pain) did not exceed seven (7) days for one of twelve sampled residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice placed Resident 2 at risk for complications related to administration of opioid medications, such as constipation, nausea, vomiting, sedation, dizziness, respiratory depression, physical dependence, addiction, and overdose.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/30/2025, the H&P indicated Resident 2's diagnoses included a pressure injury (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) and open wound. During a review of Resident 2's physician orders for the months of October 2025, November 2025, December 2025, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 19's peripheral line (a small flexible tube inserted into a vein near the skin surface to administer fluids and medications) to his right forearm dressing was changed every 72 hours (three days) per policy and procedure. 2. Ensure Resident 17's peripheral line to his right-hand dressing was changed every 72 hours per policy and procedure. 3. Ensure the Medication Cart (Cart 1) was cleaned after a sticky liquid medication had spilled onto other medications. These deficient practices of not changing the peripheral lines dressing placed Resident 19 and 17 at risk for infection at the insertion site. In addition, the sticky liquid medication spill had the potential to result in cross-contamination with other medications. Findings: a. During an observation on 11/23/2024 at 9:46 a.m. in Resident 19 room, Resident 19 had a right forearm peripheral line with a dressing dated 11/16/2024. During a review of Resident 19's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-24 · tag F0577 — isolated
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Post the report of complaint investigation results by California Department of Public Health ([CDPH] state licensing and certification agency) during the three preceding years in the areas of the facility that are prominent and accessible to the residents, visitors, family members, or resident representative. This deficient practice placed the residents, visitors, family members, or resident representative at risk of not knowing the status of the facility non-compliance outcome results and past performance history. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/23/2024 at 1:09 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON) at odd nursing station hallway, the DON stated the survey binder posted on the wall included only the last recertification survey conducted by the CDPH last year. The DON stated the facility was visited by the CDPH for a complaint visit last year and this year. The DON stated the complaint investigation results by the CDPH in the past 2 years were not included in the survey…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,434 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $12,670 — penalty dated 2026-02-06
• $1,764 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in CA