No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meadowbrook Behavioral Health Center

3951 East Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90066 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 77 certified beds · (310) 391-8266 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse2 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0607) — most recent Dec 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
11303 Washington Blvd.
Pharmacy
12001 W Washington Blvd · (866) 391-2677 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3987 Sawtelle Blvd · (310) 439-1039 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3998 Bentley Ave · (310) 253-6400 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
827 McLaughlin Islands Suite 847

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.0%10.2%15.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.6%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.0%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%9.8%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.8%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.3%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.3%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.0%10.2%21.2%check this — see note marked star below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.18
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.63
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.12
RN hoursweekends
31.9%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 77 beds and averages 76.8 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.63 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.60 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.21 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-03)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from sexual abuse (non-consensual sexual contact of any type or sexual harassment) from Resident 2 who had a history of exchanging money for sex while residing at the facility. On [DATE] at approximately 8:13 PM Resident 2 went inside Resident 1's room while Resident 1 (who did not have the capacity to consent for sexual activities) was laying down and Resident 2 pulled out his genitals. Resident 1 told Resident 2 to stop, and Resident 2 was masturbating in front of Resident 1 and got on top of Resident 1 while Resident 1 laying down. Resident 2 touched and sucked on Resident 1's breasts. Resident 1 told Resident 2 to stop, and Resident 2 did not stop. This failure resulted for Resident 1 to experience sexual abuse from Resident 2 under the care of the facility and she (Resident 1) felt like an Object, and like I don't matter. On [DATE] at 4:23 PM, the Department called an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-05-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its Abuse Prohibition Policy and Procedure (P&P) to prohibit, prevent, and investigate allegations of sexual abuse (non-consensual contact of any type or sexual harassment), for two of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) by failing to ensure Resident 1 was free from sexual abuse from Resident 2 who had a history of exchanging money for sex while residing at the facility. On [DATE] at approximately 8:13 PM Resident 2 went inside Resident 1's room while Resident 1 (who did not have the capacity to consent for sexual activities) was laying down and Resident 2 pulled out his genitals. Resident 1 told Resident 2 to stop, and Resident 2 was masturbating in front of Resident 1 and got on top of Resident 1 while Resident 1 laying down. Resident 2 touched and sucked on Resident 1's breasts. Resident 1 told Resident 2 to stop, and Resident 2 did not stop. This failure resulted for Resident 1 to experience sexual abuse from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included essential (primary) hypertension (when a person has abnormally high blood pressure that's not the result of a medical condition), paranoid schizophrenia (Persistent, false beliefs, often centered around persecution, where the individual believes they are being harmed or negatively affected by others). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P) dated 10/30/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions, however, he can make needs known. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 6/4/2025, the resident's cognition (a person's mental ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions) was intact. The MDS indicated Resident 1 could communicate needs and wants; however, Resident 1 could not make medical decisions concerning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect two of six sampled residents'(Resident 1 and Resident 4) right to be free from physical abuse when: - On 3/21/2025, Primary Counselor (PC) 1 physically fought Resident 1 inside Resident 1's assigned room and - On 4/2/2025 Resident 5 hit Resident 4 in the nose These deficient practices resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 4 being subjected to abuse and requiring x-rays after the assault and had the potential for all residents (77) to feel powerless and unprotected in the facility. Findings: A. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 8/28/2024, with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior) and bipolar disorder (sometimes called manic-depressive disorder; mood swings that range from the lows of depression to elevated periods of emotional highs). A review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 10/30/2024, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place and develop a policy on how to supervise and monitor one of one resident (Resident 1) who was transported by court personnel to attend in person court proceedings on 6/22/2026. The facility was aware Resident 1 was a high risk for elopement and had repeated verbalized wanting to leave/elope (is when a patient leaves a healthcare facility against medical advice, when doing so poses an imminent threat to the patient's health or safety) the facility. As a result, on 6/22/2026 at approximately 3 P.M., Resident 1 eloped from the court during the resident's court proceedings and has not been located. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission record, dated 1/2/2026, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on 1/2/2026 with a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia (a severe brain disorder when a person loses touch with reality causing intense fears that others will harm them). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 4/15/2026, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled resident (Resident 28) participated in care plan meetings to discuss his psychotropic (A drug or other substance that affects how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behavior) medications according to the facility's policy and procedures (P&P), Care Planning - Interdisciplinary Team, reviewed 1/21/2026. This deficient practice had the potential to violate Resident 28's right to be an active participant in his own care. Findings: A review of Resident 28's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/14/2024 with diagnoses that included schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and general anxiety disorder (a mental health condition with feeling of worry, anxiety, or fear interfering with one`s daily activities). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), dated 1/24/2026, indicated Resident 28's cognition (ability to think, read, learn, remember, reason, express thoughts…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses notify the physician for orders for blood glucose monitoring twice daily as indicated in the plan of care under the physician's progress notes for one of the three residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice of failing to notify the physician for orders as indicated in the physician's plan of care had the potential to cause adverse effects of hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) or hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (face sheet - a document containing demographic and diagnostic information) indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: paranoid schizophrenia (a serious mental disorder characterized by prominent symptoms like intense paranoia, delusions [fixed, false beliefs not based in reality], and hallucinations [seeing, hearing, feeling things that are not there]), Type 1 diabetes mellitus with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Smoking, by not performing quarterly smoking assessments for two of two sampled residents (Resident 35 and Resident 71). This deficient practice placed Resident 35 and Resident 71 at increased risk for injury related to smoking. a. A review of Resident 35's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident, on 11/18/2025 with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia (type of schizophrenia associated with feelings of being persecuted or plotted against), Syphilis (a common, curable sexually transmitted infection (STI) caused by bacteria (tiny, single-celled living organisms found everywhere in the world). A review of Resident 35's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool), dated 3/3/2026, indicated Resident 35's cognition (mental ability to make decisions of daily living) was intact. A review of Resident 35's Smoking Evaluation, dated 11/20/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely nutritional intervention/s to prevent continuous significant weight loss for one of two sampled residents (Resident 51) who had weight loss, by failing to: 1. Initiate a change of condition (COC- refers to a significant alteration in a person's physical, mental, or functional health status compared to their previous baseline, often requiring new interventions) form for an 18 pounds (Ibs - unit of measurement) weight loss documented on 3/3/2026.2. Conduct a weight variance Interdisciplinary team (IDT - a group of healthcare professionals from different disciplines [nurses, social worker, therapist, physician, etc.] that provide care for the residents) when Resident 51 experienced weight loss.3. Revise the interventions on Nutritional Risk Weight Loss care plans. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for continued weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 51's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform a physician of an abnormal laboratory (lab) result for one of four sampled residents (Resident 61) according to the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Change in Condition: Notification of reviewed 1/21/2026. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for not having appropriate treatment for abnormal laboratory results and as a result on 11/13/2025, Resident 61 was transferred to a general acute hospital (GACH) from a doctor's appointment for chronic anemia. Findings: A review of Resident 61's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 4/19/2017 and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic kidney disease stage 4 (sever kidney damage and are not properly filtering waste from the blood ), iron deficiency anemia( a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells) and anemia in chronic kidney disease. A review of Resident 61's care plan on Anemia (low blood count),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross Reference F742 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of four residents (Resident 3) from inappropriate touching by Resident 4 according to facility policy and procedures (P&P - policy explains the rules and presents them in a logical framework while procedures outline the step-by-step implementation of various tasks) titled Abuse Prohibition, with a review date of 2/23/2021. The facility was aware that Resident 3 was unable to defend himself from Resident 4 and that Resident 4 had a behavior of poor personal boundaries and inappropriate physical contact with residents and staff. This deficient practice caused Resident 3 to experience psychological stress and emotional distress by stating that Resident 4 should not be touching him (Resident 3). This deficient practice increased the risk for peer conflict and safety concerns and posed a significant risk to the safety and well-being of other residents in the facility.Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Cross Reference F600 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the psychologist (PSY - a mental health professional with advanced education [usually a doctorate] who studies the mind, emotions, and behavior, using talk therapy, assessment, and interventions to help individuals cope with life issues, mental disorders, or improve overall wellness, focusing on psychological strategies rather than medication) for one of four residents (Resident 4) who had several documented incidents of repeated inappropriate behaviors of touching Resident 3, other residents, and staff. This deficient practice caused Resident 3 to experience psychological stress and emotional distress by stating that Resident 4 should not be touching him (Resident 3). This deficient practice increased the risk for peer conflict and safety concerns and posed a significant risk to the safety and well-being of other residents in the facility.Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission record (face sheet - a document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff that was having signs and symptoms of respiratory infection (an illness caused by germs, like viruses or bacteria, that get into your breathing system -nose, throat, lungs, and airways and cause problems) stay home according to the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled Oxygen Therapy revised 1/27/2025. This deficient practice resulted in four out of 77 residents being positive for covid (COVID 19-A highly contagious respiratory disease).Findings: During a record review, Resident 6's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 6 on 3/18/2019 and readmitted Resident 6 on 9/22/2021 with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia (a condition where someone has trouble telling what's real from what's not, experiencing intense paranoia, like believing they're being targeted or watched), major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder where someone experiences a persistent deep sadness, loss of interest, or lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's Administrator (ADM) failed to ensure to provide a safe environment and oversee the safety of one of two sampled residents (Resident 10) by failing to: -Ensure Resident 10 who could not make her own decisions and Resident 9 who could not make his own decisions had a safe environment to engage in sexual activities that occurred in the facility. -Ensure all staff including Registered Nurse 1 (RN1) were aware Resident 9 and Resident 10 had sexual activities. These failures resulted for Resident 10 to feel unsafe, have emotional distress (mental suffering), and alleged Resident 9 was sexually and physically aggressive with her (Resident 10). Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 9 on 3/20/2025 with the diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a mental illness that can affect thoughts, mood, and behavior) and anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program (prevents or stops the spread of infections in healthcare settings) designed to provide a safe, sanitary (clean), and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases (illnesses that can spread from person to person) and infections for three of three sampled residents (Resident 4, Resident 5, and Resident 7) and infections by failing to: Ensure the facility implement appropriate precautions to prevent transmission of sexually transmitted infection (STI) among residents. Resident 7 who had a diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases had unprotected sex (Sexual intercourse without a condom) with Resident 4. Resident 4 had also unprotected sex with Resident 5. This failure had a potential risk for Resident 4 and Resident 5 to be exposed or to get sexually transmitted infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its' policy and procedures (P&P) by not allowing one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) to return to the facility. Resident 1 was admitted to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on [DATE] and was had an order to dicharge back to the facility on [DATE]. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 remaining at the hospital longer than necessary (24 days as of [DATE]) and had the potential to affect the resident ' s psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: During a review of the admission record for Resident 1 indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought) and diabetes mellitus (DM-a high blood sugar). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS – a resident assessment tool) dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment (a stage of cognitive decline that affects short-term memory and the ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's right to examine the results of the most recent survey (an annual inspection of the facility by State or Federal surveyors) and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility by not posting the information in a readily accessible place for four of four sampled residents (Residents 68, 22, 74, and 29). This failure resulted in the denial of the resident's rights to information regarding there care while in the facility. Findings: During record review, the admission record indicated Resident 68 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, diabetes mellitus (DM-a disease characterized by elevated levels of blood sugar), Schizophrenia (a mental illness that causes people to lose touch with reality), hyperlipidemia (an abnormally high concentration of fats or lipids in the blood). During record review, the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 11/20/24, indicated Resident 68's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage and preparation practices when: 1. Container of cooked leftover chicken was noted in the refrigerator without a date on it. 2. Opened and unboxed bags of meatballs, egg rolls, and some type of meat were not labeled or dated in the kitchen's freezer. 3. A pan of uncooked chicken stored on top of raw vegetables in the refrigerator. These deficiencies had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth that could place the residents at risk for food borne illness or contamination. Findings: During the initial tour of the kitchen and comcurrent interview with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) on 01/21/25 at 08:11 am, the following were observed: 1. Unlabeled and undated opened and unboxed bags of meatballs, egg rolls, and identified meat in the kitchen's freezer. 2. A pan of uncooked chicken sitting on top of raw vegetables. 3. A container of undated cooked chicken. 4. There was no documentation on the cooling down log for the cooked chicken that was stored in the refrigerator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Used a quality cleaning agent to prevent the spread of infection. 2. Maintain adequate supply of N95 Masks (a personal protective equipment used to protect the wearer from particles or from liquid). These failures had the potential to result in the spread of infection to residents, staff, and guests. Findings: a. During an observation and concurrent interview on [DATE] at 2:36 pm, the Housekeepers cart parked by the conference room next to the Housekeeping Supervisor. A bottle of rapid multi surface disinfectant cleaner, and a bottle of bio-enzymatic odor eliminator was observed on top of the housekeeping cart. The Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) stated housekeepers use the disinfectant to clean the entire facility, however, the disinfectant did not indicate if the disinfectant can be used for bacteria/viruses. HS stated if the solution does not kill the bacteria or viruses the residents could get an infection and the infection can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Repair leaking pipe under kitchen sink. 2. Repair entire wall panel from the sink that was completely separated from the wall. These deficient practices could result in: 1. Growth in mold and become a breeding ground for bacteria due to the damp environment it creates. 2. Rodents entering in the kitchen. Findings: During the initial tour and interview to the kitchen on 01/21/25 at 8:11 am, with Dietary Supervisor (DS), the following were observed: 1. Unlabelled and undated opened and unboxed bags of meatballs, egg rolls, and some types of meat in the kitchen's freezer. 2. A pan of uncooked chicken sitting on top of raw vegetables. 3. A container of cooked chicken without a date on it. 4. No documentation on the cooling down log for the cooked chicken that was stored in the refrigerator. 5. Water leaking under the sink where the dishes are being washed. There was a red bucket underneath the leaking pipe to catch the water. 6. A rodent trap along the wall in the kitchen near the dishwashing area, holes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) for the section relating to Antipsychotic Medication (a class of medications that treat mental illness) use for one of four sampled residents (Resident 48). 2. Transmit the quarterly and annual assessments within 14 days after completion for two of four residents sampled (Residents 45 and (52). These deficient practices had the potential to incorrectly reflect Resident 48's plan of care, care, and services received Residents 45, 48, and 52. Findings: a. During record review, the admission record indicated Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia (a mental illness that is characterized by disturbances in thought), hyperlipidemia (high fat level in a person's blood) and high blood pressure. During record review, the Physician's Orders, dated 8/27/2021, indicated the facility to administer Zyprexia (medication to treat mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop/create and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan plan (a resident-specific plan with defined clinical goals and interventions used to manage identified medical issues or other areas of concern) that addressed: 1. The psychotropic medication (a medication that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) medications and or medications and or medical needs and for one of six sampled residents (Resident 14). 2. The medical needs and goals for one of six sampled residents (Resident 16). These deficient practices had the potential to result in increased risks for Residents 14 and 16 to receive suboptimal care from facility staff in these care areas leading to diminished physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 16's admission record indicated Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included herpes viral infection (a virus causing contagious sores, most often around…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff are competent on what cleaning agents is effective to clean the facility to prevent the spread on viruses, bacteria, and infections. 2. Staff completed infection control skills competencies. These failure can cause or have the potential to cause a resident to contract an infection. Findings: During an interview on 01/23/25 at 02:36, Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) stated the disinfectant that the housekeepers clean the entire facility does not indicate what if any bacteria, infection, or viruses the disinfectant kills. HS stated if the solution does not kill the bacteria, infection, or virus the residents could get an infection that can spread to another resident and can make the residents very sick. HS stated he has never had an in-service or completed an infection control competency since being employed with the contracted cleaning service or with the facility. During an interview on 01/24/25 at 10:56 am, Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated she does not keep the files for any of the housekeepers due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted and placed in a visible and prominent place daily. As a result, the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by the staff was not readily accessible to the residents and guests. Findings: During an observation on 1/22/2025 at 11:03 AM, the facility's Daily Nurse Staffing form was observed. The Daily Nurse Staffing form indicated the number of certified nursing assistants (CNAs), Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs) and Registered Nurses (RNs) scheduled to work the three eight hour shifts. The Staffing sheet was located in an area secured by yellow and black quarantine tape that cuts off the space just before the exit door. The exit is locked to prevent residents from wandering outside the facility. The area has the staff restroom and the staff exit to the front lobby. Residents are not permitted to enter the area where the staffing is posted. During a concurrent interview and observation on 1/22/2025 at 12:57 PM, the facility's Staffing Hours Posting was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate non-consensual (without permission) sexual abuse allegation by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling afraid to remain in the facility because the resident felt LVN 2 would touch her and kiss her again. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnoses not limited to schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (mental illness that combines symptoms) and hypertension (a condition where the pressure of blood in your blood vessels is consistently too high). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool) dated 10/21/2024, indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition (mental ability to understand and make decisions). A review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 2 was ad mitted on 11/4/2024 with a diagnoses not limited to paranoid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the nursing staff met the skills and staff competency evaluation requirements and place them in the employee files for for out of four staff. This deficient practice had the potential for a knowledge, training, and certification deficit among the nursing staff, leading to inadequate or delay resident care. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE] at 1:33 pm, Director of Nursing (DON) of employee files for Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN) 3 and LVN 2, and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) 1 and 2 were reviewed. There was no current LVN license, updated CPR card, annual competencies, or updated background check, and CNA license, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) care, annual competencies, and no abuse training found. The DON stated employee files should have update/current nursing license, CPR cards, abuse training records. DON stated the facility complete competencies annually includig abuse training. DON stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy and Procedure dated 2/23/21. By failing to supervise Residents 1 and 2 while the resident were in the facility ' s staircase on 5/10/24. As a result, on 5/10/2024 at 10:40 AM Resident 2 pushed Resident 1 in the staircase, placing Resident 1 at risk for serious injury, harm, or death. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s Face Sheet indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia (extremely disorganized or unusual behavior. This may show in several ways, from childlike silliness, delusions, hallucinations to being agitated for no reason). A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS; a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 4/13/24, indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition (capable of remembering, learning new things, concentrating, or making decisions that affect everyday life). A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to the rights for one of two residents (Resident 1), to be free from physical abuse from Resident 2. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 sustaining injuries to his face. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of, but not limited, essential hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure) and paranoid schizophrenia (a pattern of behavior where a person feels distrustful and suspicious of other people and acts accordingly). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 10/4/2023, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact (relating to mental ability to make decisions of daily living) and required no assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADL ' s- activities related to personal care). A review of Resident 1 ' s Progress Note dated 2/9/2024, indicated Resident 1 had intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to designate a registered nurse (RN) to serve as full-time Director of Nursing (DON) from 10/13/2023 until 12/26/2023. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the facility's inability to establish nursing standard of practices, compliance with the Stated and Federal agencies, handle emergencies in the facility, complete incident reports, initiate investigations on incidents, manage the entire nursing department and assume the responsibility for resident care in the absence of a physician, and the assume the responsibility of an Administrator in the absence of an Administrator. Placing all 77 residents at risk for harm due to lack of clinical oversight. Findings: A review of the facility's Licensed Nurse Schedule for the months of December 2023 and January 2024, indicated no DON was scheduled to work in the facility. A review of the facility's daily assignment sign in sheets for the months of December 2023 and January 2024 indicated there was no DON signed in as working in the facility. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store and label food in accordance with professional standards and facility policy to ensure food service safety. By failing to: 1. Label food with expiration dates. 2. Discard expired food stored in the resident's refrigerator. 3. Ensure the resident's snack refrigerator had a functional thermometer. This deficient practice placed all 77 residents with compromised health status at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: During an observation of resident's snack refrigerator, on 1/9/2024 at 9:27 a.m., multiple food items were observed without labels, dates, and six food items were observed to be past labeled expiration date as well as a sport drink with a date of 9/26/23, and an electrolyte drink dated 9/26/23. The refrigerator was noted without a lock on it. The residents snack refrigerator thermometer noted to not be working properly. License Vocational Nurse1 (LVN 1) Stated housekeeping was supposed to clean the resident snack refrigerator. When asked what could happen if the residents were given expired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to follow its policy on Advanced Directives by failing to inform and documented notification to 4 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 67, 70, 51, and 40) and/or their representatives of their rights to formulate and advanced directive advance directives (written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) upon admission to the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to deny the residents their rights to request or refuse medical care and treatment. Findings: a. A review of Resident 67's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Essential (primary Hypertension [Abnormally high blood pressure that is not the result of a medical condition]) and Hypercholesterolemia (high levels of cholesterol in the blood). A review of Resident 67's Scheduled Minimum Data Set (MDS-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a water management program was in place to test the facilities water supply for disease causing pathogens (organisms that can cause disease) as part of the facility's infection control program. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for water borne diseases including pneumonia (lung infection), which could lead to hospitalization of residents. Findings: During an interview on 1/10/24 at 12:24 p.m., the Maintenance supervisor (MS) stated he did not have a diagram of the facility water system. The MS stated he had no idea where a map of the water systems might be. The MS provided a written description of the water management program. During an interview on 1/10/24 at 12:40 p.m., the regional Maintenance supervisor (RMS) in charge of training stated, the facility had not tested the water for Legionella (bacteria can cause a serious type of pneumonia), because there were no known cases of the disease in the facility. The RMS stated that if there is an outbreak then the water is to be tested…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three (3) of 27 resident rooms (Rooms 3,4, and 5) were accommodated no more than four residents in each room. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] had six (6) residents in each room while five (5) residents occupied room [ROOM NUMBER]. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the delivery of care and safety of the residents especially during an emergency. Findings: During an observation on 1/10/2024 at 8:31 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER], six (6) beds were observed with curtains closed around bed. There was a clear path to the bathroom in between all rooms. All residents were in bed with eyes closed. During an observation and concurrent interview on 1/10/2024 at 8:35 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] had six (6) beds in which five (5) were occupied. Resident 65 was observed walking around and moving freely in the room where the needs of the resident were accommodated. The facility staff were able to provide care safely and without restrictions.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure three out of six shower rooms (shower room near room [ROOM NUMBER], shower room near room [ROOM NUMBER], and the shower room near the activities room) were in safe operating condition free form safety and fire hazards. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for falls, cuts, and other illnesses caused by unhygienic conditions, which could lead to serious injury and/or death. Findings: During an observation of a facility shower room near room [ROOM NUMBER] on 1/10/24 at 11:29 a.m., with the facility Administrator (ADM) and a facility Maintenance worker (MW). The shower room was observed to be missing lightbulbs, a light fixture cover and a drain cover for the drain on the floor of the shower. The shower room also had exposed rusted pipes, peeling paint on the shower walls, and the shower floor was missing non-skid strips. During an observation of a facility shower room near room [ROOM NUMBER] on 1/10/24 at 11:39 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of five (5) sampled residents lived in a homelike environment by providing comfortable and safe temperatures. This deficient practice resulted in the residents living under comfortable and safe temperatures, which could cause the residents to lose body heat leading to hypothermia (dangerously low body temperature). Findings: 1. A review of Resident 380's admission Record, dated 10/15/2020, indicated the facility admitted the resident on 10/15/2020 with diagnoses including paranoid Schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects how a person thinks, feels and behaves), chronic idiopathic constipation (is constipation without a known cause), prediabetes (prediabetes is a serious health condition where blood sugar levels are higher than normal, but not high enough yet to be diagnosed as type 2 diabetes, a disease that occurs when your blood glucose [blood sugar], is too high). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the director of nursing (DON) failed to demonstrate knowledge of facility residents by incorrectly completing the Matrix for Providers (used to identify pertinent care categories for all residents) during a Recertification Survey (conducted to ascertain whether a provider/supplier meets applicable requirements for participation in the Medicare and/or Medicaid programs) for 77 of 77 sampled residents. This deficient practice had a potential not to meet the residents' needs due to lack of knowledge of residents' health conditions. Findings On 1/9/2024 at 7:30 a.m., the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) entered the facility to conduct a recertification survey. During an interview on 1/9/2024 at 10:30 a.m., the administrator (Adm) stated the total in-house census (number of residents physically in the building) was 77. The Adm stated the facility did not have any residents on Hospice (specialized care that provides comfort and support to the terminally ill whose doctor believes they have six months or less to live), dialysis (procedure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for five of 12 sampled residents (Resident 1, 3, 5, 6, and 10) when Resident 1, 5, 6, and 10 refused pneumonia (PNA-infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs which may fill with fluid) vaccination in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Care Plan Comprehensive, reviewed on 1/24/2023. Resident 3, who is high risk for PNA, was not offered a PNA vaccine. This deficient practice had the potential to result negative impact on Resident 1, 3, 5, 6, and 10's quality of care and services received. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 4/6/2022, with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental health problem that primarily affects a person's emotional state), COVID-19 (Coronavirus- a deadly respiratory disease transmitted from person to person), overweight and diabetes mellitus (DM-a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pneumonia (PNA-infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs which may fill with fluid) vaccine was offered and/or re-offered to four of 12 sampled residents (Resident 3, 5, 6 and 10) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures (P&P) titled, Pneumococcal (PNA) Vaccine, reviewed on 1/24/2023. This deficient practice placed Residents 2, 4 and 5 at a higher risk of acquiring and transmitting pneumonia infection to other residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 3 on 2/5/2020, with diagnoses including schizophrenia (a mental health problem that primarily affects a person's emotional state), COVID-19 (Coronavirus- a deadly respiratory disease transmitted from person to person) and diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar [glucose]). During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 27 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) accommodated no more than 4 residents per room. Rooms 3, and 4 had six residents, and 5 had five residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the delivery of care and safety of the residents, especially during an emergency. Findings: During initial tour of the facility on 3/31/2026 at 10:52 AM Rooms 3, 4 and 5 were observed. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there were six beds in the rooms all with curtains. Resident 28 stated there are no problems with the number of residents in this room. Everyone comes and goes as they please without any difficulty. During record review, the facility's room waiver request letter, dated 3/31/2026, the letter indicated the facility, serves individuals diagnosed with chronic and persistent mental illnesses, often accompanied by significant behavioral and emotional disturbances. Unlike traditional geriatric or physically compromised skilled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY AmendedBased on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the requirement of 80 square feet per resident in 17 out of 27 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27) did not meet the requirement of 80 square feet per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate usable living space for resident Rooms 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, 15, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 27. Findings: During record review, the facility's room waiver letter and the client accommodations analysis form completed by the facility on 3/31/2026, indicated the following seven rooms provided less than 80 square feet of livable space per resident.room [ROOM NUMBER]. Beds 2. Room Size (ft.) 140.6. Sq. Ft/Bed 70.3room [ROOM NUMBER]. Beds 6. Room Size (ft.) 140.6. Sq. Ft/Bed 78.1room [ROOM NUMBER]. Beds 5. Room Size (ft.) 336. Sq. Ft/Bed 67.2room [ROOM NUMBER]. Beds 2. Room Size (ft.) 138. Sq. Ft/Bed 69room [ROOM NUMBER]. Beds 2. Room Size (ft.) 138.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · No revisit needed
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 27 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) accommodated no more than 4 residents per room. room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] had seven residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] had five residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the delivery of care and safety of the residents especially during an emergency. Findings: During a tour of the facility on 1/21/2024 at 8:36 AM in Rooms 3, 4 and 5 were observed. In room [ROOM NUMBER], three beds were observed with curtains closed around and three residents were not in the room. In room [ROOM NUMBER], there was one resident still in bed and in room [ROOM NUMBER], there were 2 residents in bed. There was a clear path to the bathroom in between all rooms. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/21/2024 at 8:47 AM at Resident 60's bedside, Resident 60, stated the room gave each resident adequate space. During record review, the facility's room waiver request…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the requirement of 80 square feet per resident in six out of 27 resident rooms (Rooms 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9) in the facility that did not meet the requirement of 80 square feet per resident. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate usable living space for the residence Rooms 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9 and working space for the healthcare staff. Findings: During record review, the facility's room waiver letter and the client accommodations analysis form completed by the facility on 1/23/2025, indicated the following seven rooms provided less than 80 feet per resident: Rooms # Beds Room Size(ft.) Sq. Ft/Bed 1 2 140.6 70.3 3 6 469 78.1 5 5 336 67.2 7 2 138 69 8 2 138 69 9 2 138 69 During a concurrent an observation and interview on 1/21/2024 at 8:47 AM at Resident 60's bedside, Resident 60, stated the room gave each resident adequate space.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0912 — pattern
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure seven (7) of 27 resident rooms (1,3,5,7,8,9, and 16) met the requirement of 80 square feet (sf) per resident. These seven (7) rooms consisted of five two-bed rooms, one five-bed and one six-bed room. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate useable living space for the residents in Rooms 1,3,5,7,8,9 and 16 and working space for the healthcare staff. Findings: On 10/20/2023, the Administrator submitted a room waiver letter which indicated Rooms 1,3,5,7,8,9 and 16 did not meet the requirement of 80 square foot per resident according to federal regulation. The letter also indicated Rooms 1,3,5,7,8,9, and 16 were assigned to ambulatory residents who spent most of their time outside of the room participating in groups, activities and or community outings. These residents were high functioning and able to provide for their own care with simple cues from staff. These rooms do not block any closets, lockers, bathrooms, or entrances. The room waiver letter further indicated the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 05A269. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next