Pih Health Good Samaritan Hospital D/P SNF

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 8.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 49% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 28 beds and averages 23.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 10.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 5.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 9.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 11.05 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 5.46 to 3.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document the removal or release of mittens and wrist restraints (any manual method, physical or mechanical device, material or equipment that is attached or adjacent to the resident's body that he or she cannot easily remove that restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body) for one out of one sampled resident (Resident 46). There was no evidence in Resident 46's record indicating that the restraints were removed or released for monitoring or assessment during the shift. Failure to document the removal or release of restraints (such as mittens or wrist restraints) violates the requirement for ongoing monitoring and documentation, which is essential to ensure the restraint is medically necessary and not used for convenience or discipline. This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 46's rights and safety. This had a potential for risk for harm such as skin breakdown, restricted circulation, or psychosocial distress due to prolonged restraint.Findings: During a review of Resident 46's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of dialysis care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 34) by failing to ensure the provision of appropriate emergency equipment like hemodialysis emergency kit (Emergency bleeding control kit to control bleeding in the event of a dialysis-related complication ) is available at bedside for Resident 34 who had dialysis fistula (a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein, usually in the arm, to provide reliable, long-lasting access for dialysis). The kit typically includes critical items such as a tourniquet, pressure bandages, gauze, and a clamp or hemostat (a specialized clamp like pliers or scissors used to compress/pinch blood vessels), which are essential for immediate bleeding control. This failure had the potential to result in delayed response to a bleeding episode, placing Resident 34 at risk for significant blood loss, compromised safety, and adverse health outcomes.Findings: During a review of Resident 34's admission Record, the admission Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1 was included in the discharge planning process.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's preferences not being incorporated in his own discharge plan. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 5/30/2025, the H&P indicated, Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a hypertensive (elevated blood pressure) emergency with a past medical history of end stage renal disease (ESRD - kidney failure) on hemodialysis (a medical procedure that cleans the blood of a person whose kidneys are not functioning properly), peripheral artery disease (PAD - a condition where blood vessels outside of the heart, particularly those supplying the limbs, become narrowed or blocked, reducing blood flow to the extremities), left below the knee amputation (the surgical removal of a body part) and right foot first and third digit amputation.During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/1/2025 at 11:47 AM with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ, information of the provider's daily staffing hours for the appropriate care of the residents) report to Center for Medicare Services (CMS) in a complete and accurate manner. This deficient practice prevented the provision of complete and accurate direct care staffing information to the public. Findings: A review of the CMS PBJ Staffing Report indicated during the first fiscal quarter of 2024 dated 10/1/2023 to 12/31/2023, there was excessively low weekend staffing data triggered. During the second fiscal quarter of 2024 dated 1/1/24 to 3/31/2024, the PBJ report indicated no Registered Nurse (RN) hours were triggered (four or more days within the quarter with no RN hours). The third fiscal quarter of 2024 dated 4/1/2024 to 6/30/2024, indicated one Star Staffing Rating and excessively low weekend staffing were triggered. A review of the CMS Submission Report for the first fiscal quarter dated 2/13/2024, indicated the facility submitted 86 employee records and 1840 total staffing hour…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive, resident -centered care plans were developed for four of ten sampled residents (Residents 111, 115, 163 and 166). For Resident 111 the facility failed to develop a care plan to address the resident's non-compliance to take medications. -For Resident 115 the facility failed to develop a care plan with person centered interventions for psychotropic medication (medications that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) use. -For Resident 163 the facility failed to develop a care plan including measurable goals and interventions to monitor oxygen use. -For Resident 166 the facility failed to develop a care plan including measurable goals and interventions for the resident's multiple wounds. These deficient practices had the potential for the residents to receive inadequate care and services. Findings: a. A review of Resident 111's Facesheet Report, indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/25/2024 with a diagnoses including right foot gangrene (a serious condition that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' Minimum Data Set assessments (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool) were transmitted timely to the Center for Medicare Services (CMS) system for two of 10 sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 4). This deficient practice had the potential to result in delayed services for Resident 3 and Resident 4. Findings: A review of Resident 3's Facesheet Report indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/27/2024 with a diagnoses including right femur fracture (broken thighbone) and was discharged from the facility on 4/10/2024. A review of Resident 3's MDS dated [DATE], indicated the resident was cognitively intact (has the ability to think, remember, express thoughts and make decisions). The MDS indicated Resident 3 was independent with eating and required set up or clean up assistance with oral hygiene. The MDS indicated Resident 3 required supervision or touching assistance for upper body dressing and personal hygiene.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely and accurately complete a discharge summary for two of four sampled residents (Resident 8 and Resident 9). For Resident 8, there was no discharge summary completed within 14 days of the resident being discharged . For Resident 9, the discharge summary did not include a final summary of the resident's status. These deficient practices caused an increased risk in the continuing care of the residents. Findings: a. A review of Resident 8's Facesheet Report indicated the facility admitted the resident on 7/1/2024 with diagnoses including chest pain. A review of the Physician's Order dated 7/5/2024, indicated Resident 8 was discharged to the acute hospital and was to be transferred to the telemetry unit (a hospital ward where patients are continuously monitored for their cardiac activity and other vital signs) for anemia and hyperkalemia treatment. A review of the Discharge summary dated [DATE], indicated Resident 8's discharge diagnoses were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of ten sampled residents (Residents 166 ) received care and treatment to promote healing of wounds, as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice caused an increased risk of worsening of the wounds and potential infection for Resident 166. Findings: A review of Resident 166's facesheet report indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including failure to thrive (a condition characterized by the gradual decline in physical or mental function, resulting in an overall decline in well-being). A review of Resident 163's Active Orders, dated 9/30/2024 indicated the following wound care orders: -Paint the wound on Left Lower Extremity (LLE), left first and second toe with Betadine swab, keep it open to air every day. -Paint the wound on right first toe, left medial (middle area) ankle, left plantar (sole), lateral(side) foot and left heel with Betadine swab, keep it open to air daily. - Paint…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident(Resident 115), who was receiving nutrition by gastrostomy tube (GT- a flexible tube surgically inserted through the abdomen into the stomach for feeding, fluid, and medication administration), received appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding (tube feeding, a way of delivering nutrition directly to your stomach or small intestine). This deficient practice had the potential to lead to the inadequate care of Resident 115 and place the resident at an increased risk for complications such as infection. Findings: A review of Resident 115's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/19/2024, with diagnoses including gastrostomy tube, schizophrenia (a serious mental condition involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior, leading to faulty perception, bipolar disease (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings), and history of aphasia (a disorder that results from damage to portions of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of five sampled residents (Residents 113 and 115) were free from unnecessary use of psychotropic drugs (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) in accordance with the facility policy and procedure. For Resident 115, there was no measurable target behaviors related to the use of three antipsychotic medications. For Resident 113, there was no measurable target behaviors related to the use of two antidepressant medications. These deficient practices had the potential to place Resident 113 and Resident 115 at risk for significant adverse consequence (unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have) from the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which could result to impairment or decline in the residents' mental, physical condition, functional, and psychosocial status. Findings: a. A review of Resident 115's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/19/2024, with diagnoses including gastrostomy tube (GT- a tube surgically inserted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 65 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $5.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 100% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA