Solheim Senior Community
2236 Merton Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90041 · Non profit - Other · 76 certified beds · (323) 257-7518 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.7% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.9% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 8.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.8% | 9.8% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.2% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 6.8% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.20 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.44 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.1%CMS range 45.2–64.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 6.5–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 43.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.1%CMS range 4.6–15.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 64.1 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.41 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.57 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1) who was assessed as dependent with staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's- basic self-care tasks essential for independent living, including bathing, dressing, eating, using the toilet, and moving from place to place) and with poor ability in maintaining sitting balance was not left unattended by Certified Nurse Assistant 1 (CNA1) by turning her back from Resident 1 who was in a shower chair while in the shower room on 11/2/2025. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a fall in the shower room on 11/2/2025 at around 10 AM resulting in a laceration (a deep cut or tear in the skin) to the forehead. On 11/2/2025 at 10:40 AM, Resident 1 was transferred to General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) where Resident 1 was diagnosed with acute nondisplaced fracture (a break in the bone that has not moved out of position, is recent) of first cervical vertebra (C1, the topmost…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect for five (5) of five sampled residents (Resident 55, 39, 27, 28 and 67) reviewed for dignity care area when:1. Resident 55's clothes had brownish to blackish stain on the resident's shirt and black, ash-like fibers on the chest area.2. Resident 39's clothes had a brownish stain on her shirt. 3. Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) used labels when addressing Resident 27 during breakfast on 12/16/2025.4. Resident 28's clothes had strands of white hair and dried whitish and yellowish material on the chest and shoulder areas.5. Resident 67's activities of daily living (ADLs-fundamental self-care tasks performed daily, like bathing, dressing, eating, using the toilet, and moving around) were not provided timely. These deficient practices had the potential to affect Resident 55, 39, 27, 28 and 67's sense of self-worth and self-esteem which could result in problems with emotional and mental well-being.Findings: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of 2 sampled residents (Resident 55 and 39) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs, are activities related to personal care including bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating) were provided care and services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene when:1. Resident 55's fingernails on both hands were long, untrimmed and had blackish brown discolorations.2. Resident 39's fingernails on both hands were long, untrimmed and had brownish discolorations. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 55 and 39 to develop infection and skin breakdown which could result in the decline of the residents' wellbeing.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 55's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. The admission record indicated Resident 55's diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement treatment for the prevention of pressure ulcer (PU, painful wound caused as a result of pressure or friction) by failing to ensure that the low air loss mattress (LALM, mattress used for residents who are at risk for developing sores or already have pressure ulcer designed to circulate a constant flow of air for the management of pressure sores) was on the correct settings for two (2) of two sampled residents (Residents 24 and 37) under pressure ulcer care area, in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) and physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 24 and 37 to develop pressure ulcers. Findings:1. During a review of Resident 24's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], Resident 24's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food was prepared by methods that conserved the flavor, was palatable and served at a safe and appetizing temperature for five of five (Residents 2, 56, 13, 28, and 34) sampled residents during lunch time. This deficient practice had the potential to impact on the residents' nutritional status and quality of life, and can lead to insufficient food intake that could potentially lead to weight loss.Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 2 's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included hypertensive chronic kidney disease (a medical condition referring to damage to the kidney due to chronic high blood pressure), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( a type of irregular heartbeat where episodes start and stop suddenly, usually within 7 days, either on their own or with treatment, returning the heart to a normal rhythm) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food storage handling practices in accordance with its policy and procedure (P&P) by failing to ensure food was labeled and discarded after its use by date. These deficient practices had the potential to result in food born illness (any sickness that is caused by the consumption of foods or beverages that are contaminated with certain infectious or noninfectious agents) to 64 residents. Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/15/2025 at 7:49 AM in the facility kitchen with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the following food items were observed in the freezer: a. Four (4) frozen bags of mini empanada without a label to indicate an open or use by date.b. One (1) frozen bag of ravioli without a label to indicate open or use by date.c. 1 frozen bag of Asian Noodle without a label to indicate open or use by date.d. Two (2) frozen bags of chocolate chips cookies without a label to indicate open or use by date.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two garbage containers (dumpster) lids remained closed as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Garbage Disposal & Waste Management,. This failure had the potential to result in the attraction and spread of vermin (animals that are believed to be harmful, or that carry diseases, e.g., rodent's parasitic worms or insects) that could potentially enter the facility and spread diseases to the residents. During an observation on 12/16/2025 at 1:53 PM in the facility's alley dumpsters area, there were two dumpsters (one Black and one blue) with lids left open. In addition, the black dumpster area gate was not closed. During an observation on 12/18/2025 at 8:24 AM in the facility's alley dumpsters area, the black dumpster was observed with lids open exposing the contents inside. The dumpster area gate was not closed. During an interview on 12/18/2025 at 8:52 AM with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), MS stated per the facility's P&P, all the dumpsters' lids were supposed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure standard infection prevention control practices (a set of practices that prevent or stop the spread of infections and/or disease in the healthcare setting) were followed for two (2) of five (5) sampled residents under the infection control area in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure when:1 Resident 56's nasal cannula (a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) was found connected to the breathing treatment machine (turns liquid medicine into a fine, breathable mist [aerosol] that is inhaled directly into the lungs through a mouthpiece or mask) was not stored in a clean bag, labeled with resident's name and date of first use and left hanging in between the nightstand and the curtain close to the floor area. 2 Resident 5's nasal cannula and handheld nebulizer mask (delivers medicines in the form of aerosols to add moisture and help control respiratory symptoms) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program (coordinated interventions designed to improve and measure the appropriate use of antibiotic agents by promoting the selection of the optimal drug regimen including dosing, duration of therapy, and route of administration) for the antibiotic (medication used to treat infection) use for two (2) of three (3) sampled residents (Residents 26 and 68) by failing to:1. Ensure Resident 26's laboratory test was done such as culture (test to check for bacteria or yeast, helping identify the specific germs causing infection, and find the best antibiotic to treat it) and sensitivity (a medical laboratory test identifying germs [like bacteria or fungi] causing the infection, in a sample and the best antibiotics to kill them) to ensure the appropriate use of antibiotic. 2. Ensure Resident 68 has an indication for the use of antibiotic and urine culture and sensitivity test was done to ensure the appropriate use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light (used in healthcare facilities as an alerting device for nurses or other nursing personnel to assist a resident when in need) was within reach for three (3) of four sampled residents (Resident 55, 36, and 33) as indicated in the facility's policy and care plan.This deficient practice had the potential not to meet Resident 55, 36 and 33's needs and preferences. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 55's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], Resident 55's diagnoses included benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, also known as an enlarged prostate, is a noncancerous condition in which the prostate gland becomes larger than normal), anxiety disorder (a disorder characterized by nervousness characterized by a state of excessive uneasiness and apprehension, typically with compulsive behavior [repetitive, persistent, and often uncontrollable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable sound level (sound that does not interfere with resident's hearing and enhance privacy when privacy is desired, and encourage interaction when social participation is desired, resident's control over unwanted noise) for one of twenty sampled residents (Resident 31). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact Resident 31's quality of life.During a review of Resident 31's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 31 on 1/13/2021 and readmitted the resident on 7/11/2023 with diagnoses that included, but not limited to hypertension (elevated blood pressure), heart failure (the heart cannot pump enough oxygen-rich blood to meet the body's needs), and insomnia (common sleep disorder making it difficult to fall asleep, stay asleep, or wake up too early, leaving one feeling unrested). During a review of Resident 31's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a resident assessment tool), dated 10/29/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 31 had adequate hearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately monitor the fluid intake for one of one sampled resident (Resident 33) under hydration care area. This deficient practice had the potential to cause fluid overload (when the body has too much water, causing fluid to build up in blood vessels and tissues, leading to swelling, high blood pressure, shortness of breath, and increased strain on the heart and kidneys) and/or increase edema ( swelling caused by excess fluid trapped in the body's tissues and shortness of breath). Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 33's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (brain damage, affecting left side of the body [arm, leg, face] due to blocked blood flow, depriving brain cells of oxygen and causing cell death), chronic obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent accidents (any unexpected or unintentional incident, which results or may result in injury or illness) such as for aspiration (happens when food, liquid, or other material enters a person's airway and eventually the lungs by accident) and/ or choking (when food or another object gets stuck in your airway) for one (1) of seven sampled residents (Resident 39) from the accidents care area by failing to ensure Resident 39's head of the bed (HOB) was upright or elevated to 90-degree angle (a unit for measuring angles, where a full circle is 360 ) and properly positioned during mealtimes. This deficient practice placed Residents 39 at risk for aspiration and choking which had the potential to result in serious consequences like aspiration pneumonia (is a type of lung infection that is due to a relatively large amount of material from the stomach or mouth entering the lungs), hospitalization, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete record for one (1) of 20 sampled residents (Resident 30) as indicated in the facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice had the potential to result in miscommunication, improper delivery of care and inaccurate information of the care provided to the Resident, which could negatively affect the overall wellbeing of Resident 30.Findings:During a review of Resident 30's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE], Resident 30's diagnoses included osteomyelitis (inflammation or swelling that occurs in the bone) of the right ankle/ foot, congestive heart failure (is a long-term condition in which your heart cannot pump blood well enough to meet your body needs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, is a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs) and dementia (a progressive state of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a document that outlines the facility's plan to provide personalized care to a resident that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) to address resident's poor mobility and balance per facility policy. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a fall in the shower room on 11/2/2025 at around 10 AM while sitting in a shower chair. Resident 1 sustained laceration (a deep cut or tear in the skin) to forehead and was sent to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) on 11/2/2025 at 10:40 AM, where Resident 1 was diagnosed with acute nondisplaced fracture (a break in the bone that has not moved out of position, is recent) of first cervical vertebra (C1, the topmost bone that connects the skull to the spine) right posterior (back) arch, midline forehead hematoma…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services for two of four sampled residents (Residents 16 and 53) by failing to: 1. Administer Resident 16's diltiazem (medication for high blood pressure and angina [chest pain]) as ordered by the physician. 2. Ensure no expired medication was kept in the medication cart and medication storage room. On 10/19/2024, observed 1 expired bottle of diltiazem (Resident 16's medication), 2 bottles of buspirone (a medication that treats anxiety) and 3 bottle of Blood Sugar Check Machine Control solution (test strips used to check that the meter used to check blood sugar is working properly and is reflecting accurate results). 3. Administer Resident 53's Valproic Acid (medication given to treat Bipolar disorder which is a mental illness that causes extreme mood swings or shifts between mania and depression) as ordered by the physician. These deficient practices placed Resident 16 and Resident 53 at increased risk for being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error (any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use or resident harm while the medication is in the control of the health care professional, patient) rate during medication pass observation on 10/9/2024 was not above (5) percent (%). The outcome was two (2) medication errors out of twenty-eight (28) opportunities for errors, which resulted in a Medication Administration Error Rate of 7.1%. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 16's Face Sheet, , the Face Sheet indicated Resident 16 was originally admitted at the facility on 1/13/2021 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to chronic diastolic congestive heart failure (a condition where the heart's left ventricle [chamber in heart that receives blood] stiffens and can't relax normally), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a type of irregular heartbeat that occurs in brief episodes), hypertensive heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper food handling practices in accordance with its policy and procedure by failing to: 1. Label food items in the kitchen. 2. Discard expired food in the kitchen. 3. Discard dented soda can found in storage room. These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents and placed residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/8/2024 at 8:17 AM with kitchen staff (KS) 1, a tray of breaded fish was observed on a rack. The tray was not labeled with a preparation date or an expiration date. KS 1 stated the food item was breaded fish and it was not labeled. It should have been labeled with a preparation date and expiration date when it was prepared.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its infection control policy for four (4) of 18 sampled residents (Resident 19, 60, 9 and 53) by failing to ensure: 1. 2. and 3. Staff were using a gown while providing wound care treatment to Residents 19, 60 and 9, who were on enhanced barrier precaution (EBP, an infection control practice that involves wearing gowns and gloves during high-contact activities with residents in nursing homes). 4. Staff was using a gown while administering medication via gastrostomy (a surgical opening fitted with a device to allow feedings to be administered directly to the stomach common for residents with swallowing problems) tube to Resident 53 who was on enhanced barrier precaution. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 19, 60, 9 and 53 developing an infection and spread of infection among staff and residents. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 19's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, resident-centered care plan (a document that outlines a resident's care goals and the activities that will be performed to achieve those goals) for resident's actual fall on 6/13/2024 and implement the care plan interventions for one of two sampled residents (Resident 44). 1. On 6/13/2024, Resident 44 was left unattended by facility staff during shower to dispose soiled clothes. 2. On 10/8/2024, Resident 44 was observed Resident 44 got up from his bed by himself, and walked to the restroom and was wearing non-skid sock (slip resistant socks designed to reduce the risk of slipping and falling on wet or slippery surfaces) on left foot and no non- skid sock on the right foot. 3. Resident 44's Actual Fall care plan initiated on 6/13/2024, did not indicate the resident needs assistance during bathing. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 44 from falling on 6/13/2024 and resident sustained left hand fifth digit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to address a significant unplanned weight loss of greater than five (5) % within 30 days from 9/6/2024 to 10/9/2024 for one (1) of 1 sampled Residents (Resident 62) in accordance with the facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 62 to experience further weight loss and complications such as skin breakdown, malnutrition (faulty nutrition due to inadequate or unbalanced intake of nutrients), and weakness affecting the resident's over all well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 62's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and severe obesity (when a person's weight is more than 80 to 100 pounds above their ideal body weight). During a review of Resident 62's History and Physical (H&P) dated 9/6/2024, the H&P…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the correct oxygen level for one (1) of 1 sampled resident (Resident 16) in accordance with physician's order. These deficient practices had the potential to cause Resident 16 to experience shortness of breath (SOB) and desaturation (low oxygen level). Findings: During a review of Resident 16's Face Sheet, the admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic congestive heart failure (CHF, a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), type 2 diabetes (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and sleep apnea (a sleep disorder that causes breathing to repeatedly stop or become shallow during sleep). During a review of Resident 16's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 7/11/2024, the MDS indicated the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident 53) was free from unnecessary use of psychotropic drug (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) in accordance with the facility policy and procedure by failing to ensure Resident 53 has the specific target behavior and indication for the use and monitoring of quetiapine (Seroquel, to treat certain mental/mood disorders). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 53 at risk for significant adverse (harmful) consequences from the use of unnecessary psychotropic drug, which could result to impairment or decline in the residents' mental, physical condition, functional, and psychosocial status. Findings: During a review of Resident 53's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 53 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident 53's medication bottle for sucralfate (to prevent ulcers [open sores]) was labeled in accordance with doctor's orders and included the appropriate cautionary instructions regarding administration route. This deficient practice had the potential to harm Resident 53 due to potential dispensing and administration errors (incorrect route) and can possibly lead to adverse side effects, aspiration, and/ or death. 2. Resident 16's expired diltiazem (treats high blood pressure and prevents chest pain) was not stored in the facility's medication cart. This deficient practice had the potential for harm to Resident 16 due to the potential loss of strength of the drug, and for the residents to not receive the full effect of the medication. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 53's Face Sheet, the Face Sheet indicated Resident 53 was originally admitted at the facility on 9/19/2022 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement treatment for the prevention of pressure ulcer (painful wound caused as a result of pressure or friction) by failing to ensure that the low air loss mattress (LAL, mattress used for residents who are at risk for developing sores or already have pressure sores designed to circulate a constant flow of air for the management of pressure sores) was on the correct settings for three (3) of 3 sampled residents (Residents 30, 36, and 38) in accordance with physician's order and facility policy. This deficient practice had the potential to place the residents at risk for skin integrity complications and pressure injury. Findings: a. A review of Resident 38's admission Record indicated Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (describes abnormalities of water, electrolytes, vitamins, and other chemicals that adversely affect the brain function), muscle wasting and atrophy (muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they do not have a medication error rate of five percent (%) or greater as evidenced by eight (8) medication errors (the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order; manufacturer's specifications (not recommendations) regarding the preparation and administration of the medication or biological; or accepted professional standards and principles which apply to professionals providing services) out of 26 opportunities (observed administered medications) for error and yielded a medication error rate of 30.77 percentage (%), for one of six sampled residents (Residents 64) observed during medication administration (Med Pass). These deficient practices of medication administration error rate of 30.77 % exceeded the five (5) percent threshold and placed Resident 64 at risk for not getting the full effect of the medications and/ or for adverse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility's policy and procedure on storage and disposal of medication for one of two medication storage rooms. There were three (3) unopened straight catheters (a soft, thin tube used to pass urine from the body) with expiration date of 2/1/2022, 3 boxes of insulin syringes (a medical instrument that is expressly designed to administer insulin [a hormone that lowers the level of glucose {a type of sugar} in the blood] into the body via injection) with expiration date of 11/8/2022, four (4) boxes of Brand 1 lancets (needle that is used to obtain blood for testing blood sugar) with expiration date of 5/31/2023, 3 boxes of brand 2 lancets with expiration date of 7/2023, one (1) bottle of Brand 1 blood sugar test strip (an easy way to test your blood sugar, strips work with glucose meters to read your blood sugar levels) with expiration date of 10/31/2020, two (2) boxes of Brand 2 blood sugar test strip with expiration date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: a. Label foods in the kitchen with item names, open date and/or receive date, and expiration date or use by date, and failed to discard expired foods from food storage and walk in refrigerator. b. Monitor and clean the ice machine. c. Ensure there was an air gap (an unobstructed vertical space between the water outlet and the flood level of a plumbing fixture) for a drainage pipe and not touching the kitchen floor. These deficient practices had the potential to result in pathogen (germ) exposure to residents and placed residents at risk for developing foodborne illness (food poisoning) with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever and can lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: a. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/2/2023 at 9:38 AM in the Food Storage Room with the Director of Dining Services (DDS), the following 16 items were on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was informed in advance, of the care to be furnished and the type of professional who will furnish care for one of seventeen residents (Resident 19) based on the facility policy. This deficient practice has resulted not honoring Resident 19's right to be informed and choose the option she prefers for her ancillary care. Findings: A review of Resident 19's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re- admitted on [DATE]. Resident 19's diagnoses included severe obesity (a condition marked by excess accumulation of body fat), atrial fibrillation (Afib, an irregular and often very rapid heartbeat) and respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on your own). A review of Resident 19's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 9/12/2023, indicated Resident 19 has intact cognitive skills (mental action or process of acquiring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY b) A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re- admitted on [DATE]. The admission Record indicated, Resident 2's with diagnoses which included Diabetes Mellitus (DM, a condition that happens when your blood sugar [glucose] is too high), Functional quadriplegia (FQ, the complete immobility due to severe disability or frailty from another medical condition without injury to the brain or spinal cord) and hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure) A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care-screening tool) dated 9/5/2023, indicated Resident 2 has intact cognitive skills (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) for daily decision making. Resident 2 needs extensive assistance resident involved in activity, staff provide weight- bearing support) with one-person physical assist in bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. A review of Resident 2's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed notify the doctor for a severe weight loss and Registered Dietician (RD) recommendation on 9/22/2023 for one (1) of 3 sampled residents (Resident 5). This deficient practice placed Resident 5 at risk for further decline in nutritional status and continued weight loss. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated Resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of unspecified lump in breast, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD - a digestive disease in which stomach acid or contents irritates the food pipe lining), and Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that destroys memory and other important mental functions). During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care planning tool) dated 9/8/2023, indicated Resident 5 was not cognitively (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan to reflect the use of oxygen one (1) of 17 sampled residents (Resident 221) in accordance with the facility policy and procedure. This deficient practice placed Resident 221 at risk for not having her needs met which had the potential to negatively affect resident's well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 221's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included heart failure (condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs), morbid obesity (weight more than 80 to 100 pounds above ideal body weight), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 221's undated History and Physical Examination, indicated that Resident 221 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment and care-screening tool), dated 10/4/2023, indicated Resident 221 has intact cognition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for one of one sampled residents (Resident 36) as indicated on the facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 36 to not receive specific interventions to prevent decline in functional ability. Findings: A review of Resident 36's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re- admitted on [DATE]. Resident 36's diagnoses included status post-surgical intervention for small bowel obstruction (a surgical emergency in which the obstruction of the small intestine hinders passage of intestinal contents), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), and Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination) A review of Resident 36's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four (4) out of 17 sampled residents (Resident 26, 7, 66 and 54) receive assistance with toileting on a timely manner. This deficient practice resulted in the residents feeling frustrated and embarrassed due to delay in receiving care and had the potential to lead to skin breakdown and urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection of the bladder and urinary system). Findings: During a review of Resident 26's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of muscle wasting and atrophy (muscle shrinking), need for assistance with personal care, unsteadiness on feet, abnormalities of gait (a manner of walking or moving on foot) and mobility. During a review of Resident 26's History and Physical (H&P, the initial clinical evaluation and examination of the patient) dated 9/16/2023, indicated Resident 26 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and modify interventions, consistent with the resident's assessed needs, choices, and preferences to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for two of three sampled residents (Resident 60 and Resident 5) a. The facility failed to implement interventions to prevent weight loss for Resident 5. The resident experienced a weight loss of 19 pounds (lbs., unit of measurement. Severe weight loss if there is loss greater than 5 % in one month) in one month. b. The facility failed to implement interventions for gradual weight loss such as to assist Resident 60 with hand feeding. Resident 60 was observed with untouched food tray on 10/4/2023. This deficient practice placed Resident 60 and Resident 5 at risk for further decline in nutritional status and continued weight loss. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated Resident 5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure for one of six sampled residents (Residents 64) was free from significant medication error (the observed or identified preparation or administration of medications or biologicals which is not in accordance with the prescriber's order; manufacturer's specifications [not recommendations] regarding the preparation and administration of the medication or biological; or accepted professional standards and principles) by failing to administer seven (7) medication due to be given at 9 AM in accordance with the physician's order. The following medications for Resident 64 were administered more than one (1) hour from the scheduled administration time: 1. Acetazolamid e (treats swelling caused by heart disease) 125 milligram (mg, unit of measurement) tablet daily, administer 1 tablet by mouth daily. For fluid retention, chronic kidney disease Stage 3 ([CKD] kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood the way they should), order date 7/5/2023.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: a. Follow infection control measures in the kitchen when a dirty white towel, dish sponge, spatula, and three containers were found on the floor and moldy tomatoes were found in the walk-in refrigerator. b. Follow infection control measures for oxygen administration by having the oxygen tubing laying on the floor while the Resident 19 is on oxygen therapy on 10/4/2023. These deficient practices resulted in contamination of kitchen items and placed the residents at risk for infection. In addition, these deficient practices resulted in potential for introducing bacteria that might cause respiratory tract infection (any infectious disease of the upper or lower respiratory tract) for Resident 19. Findings: a. During initial tour in the kitchen on 10/2/23 at 9:13 AM, observed a dirty white towel, blue sponge with debris (scattered pieces of waste or remains), a stained spatula, and a large black bin lying on the kitchen floor. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUER, SUSAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/11/2023 |
| BOS, BRENDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| EGGE, PAUL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| GERRINGER, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/13/2021 |
| KALLMAN, KENNETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2021 |
| KEEDY, CL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/09/2024 |
| NAVARRO, ADRIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/01/2022 |
| STARK, SUSAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/12/2014 |
| ODEN, SAMUEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/01/2020 |
| SOLHEIM LUTHERAN HOME | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/25/1966 |
| COX, THOMAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/09/2024 |
| GARCIA, FREDERICK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/09/2024 |
| JOHNSON, JOSEPH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/09/2024 |
| KILLIAN, CHARLES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/11/2023 |
| MAGARDORNYAN, EKIK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/09/2024 |
| MOHR, GARRY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/09/2024 |
| PIERCE, MEG | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 08/24/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555432. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.