No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Temple Park Convalescent Hospital

2411 W. Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90026 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (213) 380-3210 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Aug 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$144,964 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (62) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $144,964 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-15)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
2201 W Temple St · (213) 413-2343 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Bsa Laac, 2333 Scout Way · (818) 613-5535 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Echo Park0.2 mi
2234 W Temple St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2234 W Temple St · (661) 974-6834

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased33.9%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms22.9%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.3%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.9%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.6%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.0%10.2%21.2%check this — see note marked star below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.1%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.4%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit1.9%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.182.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.351.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

20.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 48 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

20.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.64U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.36hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.25hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 122 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF20.4%CMS range 12.3–33.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 9.1–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge49.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified63.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.1%CMS range 6.2–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.581.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.30
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.81
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
32.7%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 94.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.30 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.14 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-29)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

62 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of nine sampled residents (Resident 1), who was identified with wandering episodes, was provided supervision, and maintained a safe and hazard free environment as indicated in Resident1 ' s care plan dated 2/21/2024. The facility failed to ensure a full bottle of hand sanitizer was not within Resident 1 ' s access or reach. As a result, Resident 1 ingested (drank) a toxic substance (hand sanitizer, a liquid or gel, typically one containing alcohol, that is used to clean the hands and kill bacteria, viruses, and other disease-causing agents on the skin) requiring admission to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) and was diagnosed with toxic encephalopathy (a neurologic disorder [nervous system problems] caused by consumption or exposure of harmful chemicals/toxins, that cause lead to altered mental status, memory loss, and visual problems). On 7/24/2024 at 3:58 pm., an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ - a situation in which the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was readmitted to the facility following hospital discharge when the resident's needs could be met by the facility.This failure resulted in Resident 1 remaining hospitalized for an additional day after the hospital physician determined the resident was medically stable for discharge, potentially violating Resident 1's rights to return the facility after hospitalization.During a record review of Resident 1's Transfer Record from the facility, dated 6/8/2026, the Transfer Record indicated Resident 1 was sent to a general acute care hospital (GACH 1) on 6/8/2026 due to low hemoglobin (an iron-rich protein found in red blood cells that carries oxygen from the lungs to the rest of the body, and transports carbon dioxide back to the lungs). Resident 1 was stable and required further evaluation as ordered by the facility Nurse Practitioner (NP).During a record review of GACH 1's documentation titled Discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1), Resident 1 who was assessed as high risk for falls, received adequate supervision and fall prevention interventions to prevent repeated falls on 5/31/2026 and 6/1/2026 by failing to: 1. Reevaluate the resident's fall risk or determine whether current fall prevention interventions required modification following the fall on 5/31/2026 at approximately 11 PM. 2. Update the resident's care plan or implement additional interventions prior to the second fall occurring on 6/1/2026 at approximately 3 -4 AM. As a result, Resident 1 experienced a second fall and sustained injuries to the right eye and right knee requiring hospital evaluation.During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (progressive impaired ability to think, remember or make decisions that interferes with doing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication dispositions (the processes that dictate how a drug moves through) were done by a licensed nurse and another as witness by failing to: -Ensure there was documentation of the witnesses' signatures. This failure had the potential of misuse, or improper storage, of medications.Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/27/2026 at 2:33 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the facility's Medication Disposal binder for non-controlled medications (drugs not classified under the Controlled Substances Act because they carry a low potential for abuse or dependence) was reviewed. The DON reviewed the aforementioned and counted there were three medications listed as disposed on 5/18/2026, 18 medications listed as disposed on 5/24/2026, and stated that did not have documented witness to the disposal. During an interview on 5/27/2026 at 2:35 PM with the DON, the DON stated the instruction on the medication destruction record indicated drugs shall be destroyed in the facility by a licensed nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to follow sanitary food and water safety practices and food preparation practices by failing to ensure: -The kitchen staff (in general) labeled an opened yogurt container in the reach-in refrigerator with an open date or use by date. - Two of three cutting boards in the dry food preparation area did not have deep knife marks. -To label the facility's emergency portable water (safe to drink for human consumption) reserves for 13 of 13 five-gallon water containers in the kitchen storage. These failures had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (a disease caused by consuming food or drinks that are contaminated by germs or chemicals) for 89 of 97 (unidentified) residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During an observation on 5/26/2026 at 8:32 AM of Refrigerator 2 with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), there was an opened container of blueberry yogurt with no open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for one of two sampled residents (Resident 84) by failing to:- Ensure the licensed nurses (in general) completed the documentations when Resident 84 returned from hemodialysis (HD-a life-sustaining treatment for kidney failure that acts as an artificial kidney, filtering waste, toxins and excess water from the person's body using a machine) appointments.This failure placed Resident 84 at risk of not receiving appropriate care due to inaccurate medical care information and the potential to result in confusion in the care and services provided to Resident 84. Findings:During a review of Resident 84's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 84 on 4/23/2024 and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease end stage renal disease (ESRD-a medical condition in which a person's kidney [organ in the body that filters waste and excess…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for one of two sampled residents (Resident 12) by failing to:-Ensure Resident 12's care plan addressed Resident 12's skin wound treatment. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 12's skin wound care and treatment.Findings:During a review of Resident 12's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 12 on 8/22/2025 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), pressure ulcer (injuries to the skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin) of sacral (the large, triangular bone at the base of the spine and back of the pelvis) region, Stage 4 (full-thickness skin and tissue loss with exposed muscle, tendon, ligament, cartilage, or bone). During a review of Resident 12's History of Present Illness dated 7/11/2025, the History of Present Illness indicated Resident 12 had a sacral decubitus ulcer Stage 4. During a review of Resident 12's Minimum Data Set (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice (the everyday rules and behaviors that keep patients safe and ensure high-quality healthcare) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 5) by failing to:-Ensure licensed nurses (in general) rotated the subcutaneous injection (SQ-insertion of medications beneath or under the layers of the skin) sites during medication administration (the process of giving medicine to a resident) of Resident 5's insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) medication.This failure had the potential to cause Resident 5 to have skin breakdown, bruising, lipohypertrophy (lump of fatty tissues under the skin), and/or medication malabsorption (inability to be distributed through the bloodstream to various tissue of the body).Findings:During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the correct Low Air Loss Mattress (LALM - a pressure-relieving mattress used to prevent and treat pressure ulcers [localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence]) settings for one of three sampled residents (Resident 92) who had a stage 3 pressure ulcer (Full thickness loss of skin. Dead and black tissue may be visible) to the left buttock. This failure had the potential to place Resident 92 at risk for further skin breakdown and lead to the worsening of Resident 92's stage 3 pressure ulcer.Findings:During a review of Resident 92's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/28/2026 with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body), hemiparesis (partial weakness or reduced control affecting one entire side of the body), dementia (a progressive state…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to clarify the physician's order for Meropenem (type of antibiotic, medication used to treat bacterial infections) intravenous IV (administering medication directly into the blood stream through a vein using a needle) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 77).This failure had the potential for Resident 77 to receive an increased amount of Meropenem which could lead to toxicity (a degree to which a substance can injure or poison a person), adverse side effects (any unintended, harmful, or undesirable effect of a medication), and kidney injury (a decline in kidney function). Findings:During a review of Resident 77's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted the resident from the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH, unspecified) on 5/23/202026 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by chemical imbalances, systemic illnesses, or organ failure), urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection in the bladder/urinary tract), sepsis (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure severe drug-to-drug interaction (occurs when taking two or more medications together causes unexpected, dangerous, or life-threatening reactions) were reviewed and acted upon for one (1) of 3 sampled residents (Resident 82). When on 5/27/2026 Resident 82's Biktarvy (a 3 in 1 antiviral medication used to treat Human Immunodeficiency Virus, HIV, a virus that attacks the body's immune system by destroying white blood cells) 50/200/25 milligrams (mg, unit to measure a dose) was administered with one count of Ferrous Sulfate (an iron supplement) 325 mg, and one count of magnesium oxide (a magnesium supplement) 400 mg, despite having a severe interaction alert documented in the resident's electronic health record. This deficient practice had the potential of reducing the efficacy of antiviral and negatively affects resident's health condition.Findings:During a review of Resident 82's admission record, the admission record indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 51 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dental services were provided to one of two sampled residents (Resident 24) reviewed for dental services by failing to: -Ensure to schedule Resident 24's dental consultation and treatment in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure titled Dental, Vision, and Hearing Evaluations. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 24's oral health and ability to chew food.Findings:During review of Resident 24's admission Record , the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 24 on 10/5/2024 and readmitted the resident on 3/9/2026 with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), type 2 diabetes mellitus (disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 24's Onsite Mobile Dental form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a significant change in condition was promptly reported to licensed nursing staff for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2), when Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA) did not report a resident's cough on 4/11/2026 for approximately four (4) days.This failure had the potential to delay assessment, diagnosis, and treatment, placing Resident 2 at risk for worsening condition.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of acute bronchitis (the temporary inflammation of the airways in the lungs, typically caused by viruses), and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder (COPD -lung disease causing restricted airflow and breathing problems).During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool), dated 2/5/2026, indicated, Resident 2 had intact cognitive skills for daily decision making. The MDS indicated Resident 2 required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) had a comprehensive care plan that was timely revised, consistently documented, and readily accessible to staff following a significant change in condition requiring hospitalization on 1/27/2026.This failure resulted in Resident 2 lacking a Care Plan listing goals and interventions to address her diagnosis of acute bronchitis (the temporary inflammation of the airways in the lungs, typically caused by viruses) on 1/27/2026 and had the potential to impact the coordination of care and Resident 2's health outcomes.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of acute bronchitis (the temporary inflammation of the airways in the lungs, typically caused by viruses).During a review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool), dated 2/5/2026, indicated, Resident 2 had intact cognitive skills for daily decision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure administration of medication was documented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to document when Resident 1 was given Benadryl (medication used to relieve symptoms of allergies) 25 milligrams (mg., metric unit of measurement, used for medication dosage and/or amount) orally on 9/18/25.This deficient practice had the potential for medication error and medication duplication to Resident 1. During a review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 1/31/25 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness, hypertension (high blood pressure) and dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 9/14/25, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition (participant has sufficient judgement, planning organization,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order before administering a medication to one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1 the facility failed to:1. Obtain a physician order prior to the administration of Benadryl tablet (medication used to relieve symptoms of allergies) 25 milligrams (mg., metric unit of measurement, used for medication dosage and/or amount) orally.2. Ensure the Benadryl 25 mg. tablet was not left at Resident 1's bedside table unattended.These deficient practices had the potential to result in harm to Resident 1 and other residents from inappropriate and unsafe medication administration.During a review of the admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 1/31/25 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness, hypertension (high blood pressure) and dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning).During a review of Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to administer the metronidazole (antibiotic that treats infection) 500 milligrams (mg., metric unit of measurement, used for medication dosage and/or amount) as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 not given one dose of the metronidazole 500 mg. and had the potential for Resident 1's infection to worsen.During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 1/30/25 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and pressure ulcer (wounds that occur from prolonged pressure on the skin) of the sacral region (lower back). During a review of Resident 1's Care Plan initiated on 2/26/25 indicated Resident 1 was on enhanced barrier precautions (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were kept secure in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of four sample residents (Resident 2). During medication pass observation on 7/22/25 at 9 a.m., the facility failed to ensure Resident 2's medications were not left on top of the medication cart while the medication cart was left unattended. This deficient practice had the potential for other residents and other individuals to easily access the medications on top of the cart for their own. use. During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 2 on 8/2/23 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs) and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool) dated 7/10/25 indicated Resident 2 was cognitively intact. Resident 2 needed substantial assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with toileting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement the care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to assess and document weekly Resident 1 ' s moisture associated skin damage (MASD, moisture associated skin damage caused from prolonged exposure to moisture) to the buttocks area as indicated in Resident 1 ' s care plan. This deficient practice resulted in not being able to determine if Resident 1 ' s MASD had healed before Resident 1 was discharged from the facility on 4/11/25. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 4/2/25 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), difficulty in walking and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 4/6/25 indicated Resident 1 had severed cognitive impairment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment is free of hazard for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). During observation on 5/13/25, the facility hall was lined with linen carts, dirty linen hampers, trash hampers and showers chairs on both sides of the hall. Residents 3 stated it was difficult for him to self-propel his wheelchair due to the clutter in the hallway. This deficient practice had the potential for accidents to occur for Resident 3 and other residents. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 3 on 3/21/24 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM, disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), muscle weakness and abnormalities of gait and mobility. During a review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 3/4/25 indicated Resident 3 was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated Resident 3 was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs) and used the walker and wheelchair as mobility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled Residents (Resident 19) had an advance directive (a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions). This failure violated Resident 19 and/or representative's rights to be fully informed of the option to formulate an advanced directive and had the potential not to follow Resident 19's wishes. Findings: During a review of Resident 19's admission Information, the admission Information indicated the facility admitted Resident 19 on 9/30/2024 and readmitted Resident 19 on 3/6/2025 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by problems with the body's metabolism), cerebral infarction (a condition where brain tissue dies due to a lack of blood flow and oxygen) and moderate intellectual disabilities (observable developmental delays, which may be accompanied by physical impairments). During a review of Resident 19's Resident Care Conference Review dated 10/11/2024, the Resident Care Conference Review indicated Resident 19 was under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes, board and care centers, and assisted living facilities) when the facility transferred one of two sampled residents (Resident 53) to the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH). This failure had the potential for Resident 53 not to have a representative. Findings: During a review of Resident 53's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/8/2024 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, a virus that attacks the body's immune system), chronic respiratory failure (a condition when the lungs cannot release enough oxygen into the blood), congestive heart failure (CHF, a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure to implement the care plan for one of 19 sampled resident (Resident 92) for the use of a hand mitten (used to help protect residents who are prone to disrupting medical treatment). This failure had the potential to cause a lack of monitoring for Resident 93's skin integrity and circulation. Findings: During a review of Resident 92's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 92 on 1/9/2025 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (a serious condition where blood flow to the brain is blocked, leading to tissue damage and death), legal blindness, and need for assistance with personal care. During a review of Resident 92's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 1/13/2025, the MDS indicated the resident was not oriented to the day, month, or year. The MDS indicated Resident 92 had poor recall. During an observation on 4/7/2025 at 10:29 AM in Resident 92's room, Resident 92 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain good hygiene for one of one sampled residents (Resident 68). This failure had the potential to expose Resident 68 to skin irritation, skin breakdown, and possible infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 68's admission Record), the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 68 on 1/24/2025 with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care (bathing, dressing, eating, toileting, and transferring - moving from one place to another), hemiplegia (the loss of the ability to move, feel, or otherwise control muscles on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it) affecting left non-dominant (the side that is not your preferred side of the body for performing tasks) side. During a review of Resident 68's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer insulin (a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) according to the facility's policy by failing to rotate the administration site when administering insulin to one of one sampled residents (Resident 4). This failure had the potential for Resident 4 to experience skin complications. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted the resident on 1/26/2025 with diagnosis that included type 2 diabetes (DM, a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). During a review of Resident 4's Physician Orders dated 1/27/2025, the Physician Order indicated the resident was to receive Humulin R Insulin (a medication used to manage type 2 diabetes by lowering blood sugar levels) per sliding scale (varies the dose of insulin based on blood glucose level) subcutaneously (a method of administering medication by injecting it into the fatty layer of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Treatment Nurse 1 (TN1) monitored the progression of the pressure ulcers (pressure injury, localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) for one of one sampled residents (Resident 53). This failure had the potential for Resident 53's pressure ulcers to worsen. Findings: During a review of Resident 53's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility re-admitted the resident on 2/1/2025 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, a virus that attacks the body's immune system), chronic respiratory failure (a condition when the lungs cannot release enough oxygen into the blood), congestive heart failure (CHF, a heart disorder which causes the heart to not pump the blood efficiently, sometimes resulting in leg swelling), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 53's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure not to leave a lighter unattended (left alone without supervision) and unsecured (unprotected) at a resident's bedside table for one of two sampled residents (Resident 55). This failure had the potential Resident 24 to sustain burns and/or cause a fire. Findings: During a review of Resident 55's admission Record dated 4/10/2025, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 55 on 4/30/2026 and readmitted Resident 55 on 10/28/2024 with the diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty in breathing) and nicotine dependence (a person's body and brain become used to having nicotine, the addictive substance in tobacco products such as cigarettes), cigarettes, uncomplicated. During a review of Resident 55's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) dated 2/11/2025, indicated Resident 55 had the ability to make himself understood and had the ability to understand others. The MDS indicated Resident 55 was independent or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care services for one of two sampled residents (Resident 78), by failing to ensure Resident 78 who was receiving oxygen through a nasal cannula tubing (device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow to a person in need of respiratory help) was not wrapped around a trash can while Resident 78 used the nasal cannula. This failure had the potential for Resident 78 to experience respiratory infections (infections of parts of the body involved in breathing) associated with using an unsanitary (dirty, unhealthy, or unclean in a way that could endanger health) nasal cannula tubing. Findings: During a review of Resident 78's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 78 on 4/23/2024 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included pneumonia (an infection/inflammation in the lungs), acute and chronic respirator failure (a sudden and gradual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document and monitor for manifestations of behavior (how a person's personality or inner state is expressed through their outward actions and reactions) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 3) who was taking Aripiprazole (Abilify, a medication known as an antipsychotic medication used to treat and manage schizophrenia [a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly]). This failure had the potential for Resident 3 to take unnecessary medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, the admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/22/2023 with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 2/25/2025, the MDS indicated the resident was cognitively intact (had the ability to think,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two opened insulin pens (a device used to administer insulin, a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication) were discarded per facility's policy. This failure had the potential for the medication dispensing errors. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/9/2025 at 2:23 PM, the facility's medication refrigerator was observed with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 in the facility's medication storage room. In the medication refrigerator the following were observed: 1. Novolog Flexpen (a type of insulin pen) labeled with an open date of 3/8/2025 and a discard date of 4/5/2025. 2. Lantus Solostart pen (a type of insulin pen) with an open date of 2/5/2025 and labeled discard. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/9/2025 at 2:23 PM, LVN 1 stated that opened insulin pens should not be kept in the refrigerator and if the insulin pens were labeled discard they should be discarded and not left in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan (a plan of care that summarizes a resident's health conditions, specific care needs, and current treatments) for one of three residents (Resident 2's) right hand swelling noted on 1/5/25. This failure had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record dated 1/14/25, it was indicated that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), muscle weakness, hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), abnormal posture, and Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/19/24 indicated the patient did not have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 2) was offered a substitute meal as required if the resident consumed less than 50% of the meal. This deficient practice had the potential to result in malnutrition, dehydration, and overall decline in health and medical condition. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record dated 1/14/25, it was indicated that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), muscle weakness, hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), abnormal posture, and Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 7/19/24 indicated the patient does not have the capacity (ability) to consent, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mouthcare regularly for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). During observation on 12/30/24 at 10 a.m., Resident 1 was observed with creamy substance at the corner of the left mouth, tongue was coated with white crust and the lower lip was dry with crusts. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to suffer from pain and infection. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 7/18/24 with diagnoses including dementia (progressive sate of decline in mental abilities), Alzheimer's disease (progressive decline in mental abilities) and need for assistance with personal care. During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 10/21/24 indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident 1 needed substantial assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, lower body dressing, putting/taking off footwear, personal hygiene, and moderate assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the records for residents were complete and accurate for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). For Resident 1, the facility failed to ensure the fluid and oral intake were accurately documented on 12/15/24,12/16/24, 12/17/24 and 12/29/24. This deficient practice resulted in failing to determine the oral and fluid intake of Resident 1. Findings: During a review of the admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 7/18/24 with diagnoses including dementia (progressive sate of decline in mental abilities), Alzheimer's disease (progressive decline in mental abilities) and need for assistance with personal care. During a review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 10/21/24 indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident 1 needed substantial assistance (helper does more than half the effort) with toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, lower body dressing, putting/taking off footwear, personal hygiene, and moderate assistance (helper does less than half the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of Coronavirus - 19 (COVID-19, COVID, a virus that causes respiratory illness that can spread from person to person) as evidenced by: 1. Failing to ensure that one of the three sampled residents (Residents 1) was wearing a mask while the facility was in an active Covid 19 outbreak (a sudden increase in the number of cases of a disease or medical condition in a specific location or population over a given time period). 2. Failing to ensure that staff were fit tested for N95 respirators/masks (is a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) 3. Failing to ensure that staff were appropriately screened before starting their shifts. These deficient practices had the potential to place both residents and staff at a risk for infection to COVID-19.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to implement abuse policy and procedure when the facility failed to report to the State Agency: 1. The alleged abuse between two residents (Residents 3 and 4). 2. The injury of unknown origin for Resident 5. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 3 and Resident 4 exposed to continuous verbal and mental abuse and for Resident 5 with a potential for contiuned physical abuse. Cross Reference: F726. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 3's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hepatic encephalopathy (a serious and potentially reversible condition that can affect individuals with advanced liver dysfunction), alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver (a condition that occurs when the liver is permanently damaged by alcohol, causing scar tissue to replace healthy tissue), and insomnia (a common sleep disorder that makes it difficult to fall asleep, stay asleep, or get quality sleep). During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to implement abuse policy and procedure when the facility failed to report to the State Agency: the injury of unknown for 0ne of the three sampled residents (Resident 5). This deficient practice had the potential exposed to continuous verbal and mental abuse from Resident 3 causing mental anguish and emotional distress. Findings: During a review of Resident 5 ' s admission Record FS indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (a neurological disorder that causes brain dysfunction due to a chemical imbalance in the blood), dementia (a syndrome that causes a decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, and problem-solving, that can interfere with daily activities), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 5 ' s H&P dated 4/9/2023 indicated, Resident 5 did not have the capacity to consent. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1. That licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to adequately assess stage Pressure Ulcers (PU-injuries to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin. They most often develop on skin that covers bony areas of the body, such as the heels, ankles, hips, and tailbone. They range from stage 1 through stage 4: I-intact skin with redness, II-broken skin or intact blister involving top layer of the skin, III- broken skin extending to the fatty tissue, and IV- broken skin extending to the muscle or the bone) for one out of three sampled residents by failing to grade the stage 3 pressure ulcer. 2. To implement abuse policy and procedure when the facility did not Identify and assess all possible incidents of abuse (Resident 5). This failure had the potential to result in improperly treating the wound which may lead to the wound getting infected and also exposed Resident 5 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to have a full-time abuse coordinator (Administrator) in the facility. As a result, the incidents of abuse and neglect were not managed and addressed for three of three residents (Residents 3, 4, and 5). Cross Reference: F609 Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 3's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hepatic encephalopathy (a serious and potentially reversible condition that can affect individuals with advanced liver dysfunction), alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver (a condition that occurs when the liver is permanently damaged by alcohol, causing scar tissue to replace healthy tissue), and insomnia (a common sleep disorder that makes it difficult to fall asleep, stay asleep, or get quality sleep). During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated 6/24/2024 indicated Resident 3 was cognitively (the mental ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 1) in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices by ensuring accurate documentation. This deficient practice had the potential to result in confusion in the care and services rendered to Resident 1 as evident by the inaccurate information entered into Resident 1's clinical record. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated the facility initially admitted the on 2/17/2024 and readmitted on 7/12//2024 with diagnoses that included toxic encephalopathy, dementia (loss of cognitive functioning-thinking, remembering, and reasoning), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), and aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage). During a review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- standardized data collection tool used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered care plan that included dementia (a disorder of mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorder, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) care needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of care and services. Finding: A review of Resident 1's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 4/10/2023, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia, history of falling, and metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by an illness or organs that are not working as well as they should). A review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS – a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated 1/18/2024, indicated the resident's cognitive skills (ability to think, remember, and make decisions) for daily decision making was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to sufficiently prepare one of three sampled resident (Resident 1) for a safe and orderly discharge from the facility to the resident ' s home, by failing to include the resident ' s significant other who was the primary care giver in the discharge process and by failing to ensure all necessary medical equipment and supplies were ordered. This failure resulted in resident 1 not having the appropriate Durable Medical Equipment (DME - any medical equipment used in the home to aid in a better quality of living) necessary for safe ambulation and transfer, and with no support/relief for the caregiver (CG). Placing Resident 1 at risk for accidents, injuries, and/ death. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including functional quadriplegia (complete inability to move due to severe disability or frailty caused by another medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by not labeling: A.Sliced ham with the use by date. B. Ground chicken with the use by date. C. Chicken meat with the use by date D. Sliced Bacon with the use by date. E. Creamy Italian Dressing with the use by date. F. Sausage with the use by date The facility failed to discard ground beef that was still being stored in the refrigerator after its use by date of 3/21/2024 and failed to maintain the refrigerator and freezer temperature log on 3/30/2024 and 3/31/2024. These deficient practices had the potential to cause food-borne illnesses. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/1/2024 at 7:52 A.M., the following was in the refrigerator: - Sliced ham in a transparent plastic container with a blue lid with an open date of 3/30/24 and no use by date label. - Ground chicken inside a white plastic bag with an open date of 3/22/24 and no use by date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that maintained or enhanced residents dignity and respect in full recognition of their individualities for two of ten sampled residents (Resident 85 and Resident 92). For Resident 85, the facility failed to cover the urinary collection bag (designed to collect urine drained from the bladder via a catheter) with a privacy bag. For Resident 92, the facility failed to provide dignity by standing over the resident while assisting her during a meal. These deficient practices had the potential to negatively affect the residents psychosocial wellbeing and loss of dignity. Findings: a. A review of Resident 85's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/6/2023, with diagnoses including muscle weakness, and paraplegia (loss of ability to move that affects your legs, but not your arms). A review of Resident 85's Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the resident had intact cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a call light was within reach for one of four sampled residents (Resident 90) investigated for the call lights care area. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the residents not being able to call for facility staff assistance. Findings: A review of Resident 90's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/19/2023 with diagnoses including Huntington disease (an inherited disease that causes the progressive breakdown [degeneration of the tissue to a less functional active form] of nerve cells in the brain), hypertension (a condition in which blood pressure is higher than normal), and abnormalities in gait and mobility. A review of Resident 90's History and Physical, dated 12/22/2023, indicated the resident had limited capacity to consent. A review of Resident 90's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment and care screening tool), dated 12/26/2023, indicated the resident had mildly impaired cognition (a slight decline in mental abilities, memory and completing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Advance Directive Acknowledgement forms (document provided by the facility that indicates whether a resident has an Advance Directive [AD- a written instruction, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is unable to make decisions for themselves], would like information regarding creation of an advance directive, or refusal to create an advance directive) were completed thoroughly for two of seven sampled residents (Residents 36 and Resident 85). These deficient practices had the potential for the facility to not honor the residents' medical decisions regarding end-of-life treatment. Findings: a. A review of Resident 36's admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 6/8/2023, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including polyneuropathy (the simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body), dementia (decline in mental ability…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was provided a communication device or board with the language that the resident was able to understand for one of one sampled resident (Resident 25). This deficient practice had the potential to delay the delivery of necessary care to the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 25's admission Record indicated that the facility admitted Resident 25 on 10/17/2022 readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), hypertension (a condition in which blood pressure is higher than normal) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A review of Resident 25's History and Physical, dated 9/18/2023, indicated the resident had fluctuating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL- refer to an individual's daily self-care activities such as eating, dressing/grooming, bathing/personal hygiene, mobility and toileting) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 29) who had severely impaired vision. This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to experience poor oral intake and be at risk for weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 29's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/18/2021, and with diagnoses including glaucoma (a group of eye diseases that can cause vision loss and blindness by damaging a nerve in the back of your eye), need for assistance with personal care, type two diabetes ( high blood sugar), and depression (a mood disorder that causes feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A review of Resident 29's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment and care screening tool) dated 2/4/2024, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of the six sampled staff Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2) had a Basic Life Support (BLS - an emergency lifesaving procedure that includes recognition of the signs of sudden cardiac arrest, heart attack, and stroke, as well as the performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] when the heart stops beating) certificate was up to date. This deficient practice had the potential to result in facility residents receiving emergency care that was not up to date, which could lead to resident harm and/or death. Findings: A review of CNA 2's employee file indicated the CNA 2 had a BLS certificate that expired on 3/2024. A review of the Nursing Staffing Assignment and sign-in sheet dated [DATE] indicated that CNA 2 was working in the facility on [DATE]. During a concurrent interview and record review on [DATE] at 9:50 AM, CNA 2's employee file was reviewed with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The DSD verified that CNA 2's BLS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of six sampled residents (Resident 42), who was identified with visual impairment and functional limitation, was provided with activities that stimulate the resident's senses as evidenced by -Failing to provide Resident 42 with a radio and television. -Failing to formulate a care plan for activities for Resident 42. -Failing to perform an activity participation review quarterly for Resident 42. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 42 experiencing emotional distress verbalizing she felt her days were empty; and indicating she was frustrated and uncomfortable because she was bored. Findings: A review of Resident 42's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 11/6/2020 and re-admitted the resident on 10/27/2021 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive (a decline in older adults that manifests as a downward spiral of health and ability), cachexia (a general state of ill health involving great weight loss and muscle loss), muscle weakness, dysphagia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 98) received pressure ulcer (localized skin and soft tissue injuries that form as a result of prolonged pressure and shear, usually exerted over bony prominences) care as indicated in their policy and procedure as evidenced by: -Failing to ensure Resident 98's wound vac (negative pressure wound therapy, a therapeutic technique using a suction pump, tubing, and a dressing to remove excess drainage and promote wound healing) was on and functioning. -Failing to revise Resident 98's Stage 4 pressure ulcer (pressure injuries that extend to muscle, tendon, or bone) care plan. These deficient practices had the potential to cause the development and worsening of Resident 98's pressure ulcer that could lead to severe illness, hospitalization, and death. Findings: A review of Resident 98's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/14/2024 with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition in which brain function is disturbed either…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled resident's (Resident 84) urinary indwelling urinary catheter (Foley catheter [brand name] a flexible tube (a catheter) inserted into the bladder that remains (dwells) there to provide continuous urinary drainage) was securely anchored (secured to the resident). This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to endure pain from potential pulling tractions and dislodgement of the catheter that may result in urethral (a muscular structure that helps keep urine in the bladder until voiding can occur) trauma. Findings: According to the admission record, the facility admitted Resident 84 on 2/11/2024, and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included urinary tract infection, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS, assessment and care-screening tool), dated 3/4/2024, indicated the resident had severe cognitive (ability to acquire and understand knowledge) impairment. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services according to professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 39). The facility implemented the following deficient practices: - the facility administered oxygen via a non-rebreather mask without a physician order and without administering 10 -15 LPM oxygen as required for correct functioning of mask. - failed to monitor oxygen saturation level in accordance with the physician's order - develop/revise a plan of care for Resident 39 who was using oxygen and had had shortness of breath Findings: A review of Resident 39's admission record indicated Resident 39 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included myocardial infarction (heart attack), type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar) and high blood pressure. A review of the History and Physical, dated 8/4/2023, indicated the resident's lung sounds were diminished…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 32) who was dependent upon hemodialysis (a medical procedure to remove fluid and waste products from the body) had an emergency kit at resident's bedside. This deficient practice had the potential for resident to receive delay intervention during accidental bleeding. Findings: A review of the admission record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 32 on and re-admitted on [DATE] and readmitted the resident on 3/25/2024 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease (ESRD, when kidneys are no longer able to work as they should to meet the needs of the body) requiring hemodialysis, type 2 diabetes mellitus (adult onset diabetes - a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), legal blindness, right foot amputation. A review of the Physician's Orders, dated 3/25/2024, indicated Resident 32 required hemodialysis every Monday, Wednesday and Friday at 11:30 AM. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post staffing information per the facility policy and procedure titled, 'Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers. This deficient practice had the potential for residents, staff, and visitors of the facility to not have knowledge of the facility's staffing information. Findings: During an observation on 4/23/2024 at 4:15 PM, the facility's staff posting was observed displayed at the nursing station. The staff posting did not indicate the facility's name. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/4/2024 at 10:51 AM, the facility's staff posting was reviewed with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The DSD stated the staff posting did not include the facility's name and that it was important for the facility's name to be included in the staff posting so residents, visitors, and staff know the information is for the facility. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/4/2023 at 1:14 PM, the facility's staff posting was reviewed with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the nutritional needs for two out of six sampled residents (Resident 14 and Resident 29) by failing to provide double portion meals as ordered by the physician. These deficient practices had the potential to result in decreased nutritional intake and weight loss. Findings: a. A review of Resident 14's admission Record indicated that the facility admitted the resident on 8/16/2019, and readmitted him on 3/26/2024, with diagnoses including polyneuropathy (the simultaneous malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), dysphasia (swallowing difficulties), fibromyalgia (chronic, widespread pain throughout the body or at multiple sites), and urinary tract infection (an infection in any part of the urinary system). A review of Resident 14's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and screening tool),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to evaluate the food preferences for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1), as evidenced by failing to perform a Nutrition Evaluation for the resident quarterly. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 1 to feel their needs were not being met and experience emotional distress. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility initially admitted the resident on 11/13/2003 and re-admitted the resident on 5/30/2019 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), hypertension (high blood pressure), depressive episodes (a person experiences a depressed mood (feeling sad, irritable, empty), type 2 diabetes (a long-term medical condition in which your body doesn't use insulin properly, resulting in unusual blood sugar levels), and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol levels in the blood). A review of Resident 1's History and Physical dated 7/27/2022, indicated the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the licensed nursing staff failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards for one sampled resident (Resident 16). The facility failed to ensure the licensed nursing staff maintained accurate information regarding the Physician's Order for Life-Sustained Treatment (POLST) for Resident 16. This deficient practice had the potential for the facility to not honor the resident's medical decisions regarding end-of-life treatment. Findings: A review of Resident 16's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including encephalopathy (brain disease, damage, or malfunction of brain), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious condition that occurs when the air sacs of the lungs cannot release enough oxygen into the blood ), dysphasia (a swallowing difficulties), encounter for attention for gastrostomy (a surgical procedure to insert a tube through the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to confirm the identity of two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2). Resident 1 who had an audiology (hearing tests that use different techniques to identify hearing loss) appointment on 2/28/24, the facility failed to use identifiers (information directly associated with an individual that reliably identifies the individual as the person for whom the service or treatment is intended) to confirm the identities of Resident 1 and Resident 2. The facility sent Resident 2 to the audiology examination appointment instead of Resident 1. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 1 missed his appointment, had to be rescheduled and had the potential to delay of treatment. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 11/17/23 with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the responsible party (RP) before changing rooms for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to violate the resident and responsible party's rights in participating in decision making, care planning and treatment choices. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 3/18/21 with diagnoses including glaucoma (group of eye disease that can cause vision loss and blindness by damage to the optic nerve [nerve that connects the eye to the brain]), muscle weakness and diabetes mellitus (increased blood glucose [sugar]). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, standardized care and health screening tool) dated 2/4/24, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively (relating to process of thinking, reasoning, and remembering) intact. Resident 1 required supervision with toileting hygiene, shower, upper and lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear and needed set up with eating, oral and personal hygiene. A review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its' policy and procedures titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, for one of three sampled residents, (Resident 1) by failing to report an alleged abuse incident to the State Survey Agency (SSA), the local Ombudsman (examines complaints from people who resides in skilled Nursing Facilities who feel they have been unfairly treated by facility staff) and law enforcement. This deficient practice resulted in a delay of an onsite inspection by the SSA to rule out abuse placing Residents 1 and others residents at risk for further abuse. Findings: An unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate an alleged abuse on 11/3/2023. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including aftercare following surgery of the digestive tract, delayed milestone in childhood (developmentally delayed), difficulty walking, and generalized muscle weakness. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-03 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Notice of Proposed Transfer/Discharge was provided to the resident or to the responsible party prior to transfer/Discharge for three of six rsampled esidents (Resident 1, 2, and 3). The facility also failed to provide documentation to show that the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (public advocate) was notified of the transfer/discharge from the facility for one of the six sampled residents (Resident 3). These deficient practices had the potential to deny residents being informed of their rights and protect residents from transfer/discharge without due process for Resident 1, 2, and 3. Findings: a. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 1/20/2022 with diagnoses including hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$144,964 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $144,964 — penalty dated 2024-07-15
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-24 for 7 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
KOHN, BARRYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 02/26/1976
KOHN, TOBYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/1976
CAMBARE, RENFELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/14/2004
MANANSALA, HAROLDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2025
PARDILLA, CECILLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/19/2023
SHTORCH, EYALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/05/2025
ZAMORA, LUCIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/31/2023
ZEMEL, ELLIOTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/16/2012

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+3.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$291K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 33%Other / private 12%

This home reported $291K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$424per resident / day
operating cost
$12,889per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$438per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555019. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next